Results of the 2004 Indian general election in Tamil Nadu by assembly constituents
Introduction This is a detailed results of 2004 general election by individual constituents in Tamil Nadu.
Results by party === Results by party === '''Party''' '''Alliance''' '''Seats Contested''' '''Votes''' '''%''' '''Change''' '''Seats''' '''Change''' Bahujan Samaj Party none 30 167,619 0.58 n/a 0 n/a Bharatiya Janata Party National Democratic Alliance 6 1,455,899 5.07 -2.07 0 -4 Communist Party of India Left Front 2 852,981 2.97 +0.41 2 +2 Communist Party of India (Marxist) Left Front 2 824,524 2.87 +0.52 2 +1 Indian National Congress United Progressive Alliance 10 4,134,255 14.40 +3.30 10 +8 All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam National Democratic Alliance 33 8,547,014 29.77 +4.09 0 -10 Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation Left Front 3 6,886 0.02 -0.01 0 0 Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam United Progressive Alliance 16 7,064,393 24.60 +1.47 16 +4 Janata Dal (United) National Democratic Alliance 20 884,293 3.08 n/a 0 n/a Marumaralarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam United Progressive Alliance 4 1,679,870 5.85 -0.10 4 0 Pattali Makkal Katchi United Progressive Alliance 5 1,927,367 6.71 -1.50 5 0 Rashtriya Lok Dal none 3 3,985 0.01 n/a 0 n/a Shiv Sena National Democratic Alliance 2 5,154 0.02 +0.02 0 0 Samajwadi Party none 4 6,645 0.02 n/a 0 n/a Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha none 4 11,568 0.04 n/a 0 n/a Bharatiya Backward Party none 2 2,162 0.01 n/a 0 n/a Jebamani Janata none 1 734 0.00 n/a 0 n/a Janata Party National Democratic Alliance 28 149,646 0.52 n/a 0 n/a Republican Party of India (Athvale) United Progressive Alliance 2 9,654 0.03 +0.02 0 0 Tamil Desiyak Katchi none 2 25,348 0.09 0.00 0 0 Youth and Students Party none 1 6,580 0.02 n/a 0 n/a Independents none 391 947,938 3.30 +2.05 0 0 '''Total''' '''571''' '''28,714,515''' - - '''39''' -
Results by constituency ===Chennai North===* Note: Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Pattali Makkal Katchi were all part of the National Democratic Alliance, in 1999, but joined the United Progressive Alliance in 2004.So the coalition switches, represent the change in coalition from the 1999 election to 2004 election. Note: The incumbent party DMK did not contest this seat in 2004.Instead it was contested by its United Progressive Alliance coalition partner PMK, who won the seat. Thus, the UPA held the seat. PMK had not contested this seat in the previous 1999 elections. Note: The incumbent party PMK did not contest this seat in 2004.Instead it was contested by its United Progressive Alliance coalition partner DMK, who won the seat. Thus, the UPA held the seat. DMK had not contested this seat in the previous 1999 elections. Note: The incumbent party PMK did not contest this seat in 2004.Instead it was contested by its United Progressive Alliance coalition partner MDMK, who won the seat. Thus, the UPA held the seat. MDMK had not contested this seat in the previous 1999 elections. Note: The incumbent party MDMK did not contest this seat in 2004.Instead it was contested by its United Progressive Alliance coalition partner PMK, who won the seat. Thus, the UPA held the seat. PMK had not contested this seat in the previous 1999 elections. Note: AIADMK, was not part of a coalition, in 1999 election, hence it is a gain for UPA. Note: AIADMK, was not part of a coalition, in 1999 election, hence it is a gain for UPA. Note: The incumbent party MDMK did not contest this seat in 2004.Instead it was contested by its United Progressive Alliance coalition partner DMK, who won the seat. Thus, the UPA held the seat. DMK had not contested this seat in the previous 1999 elections. Note: AIADMK, was not part of a coalition, in 1999 election, hence it is a gain for UPA. Note: AIADMK, was not part of a coalition, in 1999 election, hence it is a gain for UPA. Note: AIADMK, was not part of a coalition, in 1999 election, hence it is a gain for UPA. Note: AIADMK, was not part of a coalition, in 1999 election, hence it is a gain for UPA. Note: AIADMK, was not part of a coalition, in 1999 election, hence it is a gain for UPA. Note: The incumbent party MADMK did not contest this seat in 2004.Instead it was contested by its coalition partner from the previous 1999 elections - DMK. Also, this is a gain for the UPA, since MADMK, the incumbent was part of the NDA coalition, while DMK left the NDA for UPA      Note: AIADMK, was not part of a coalition, in 1999 election, hence it is a gain for UPA. Note: AIADMK, was not part of a coalition, in 1999 election, hence it is a gain for UPA.
References