Characterization of a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reference material
Development of diagnostic testing capability has advanced with unprecedented pace in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. An undesirable effect of such speed is a lack of standardization, often leading to unreliable test results. To assist the research community surmount this challenge, the National Research Council Canada has prepared a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reference material, SMT1-1, as a buffered solution. Value assignment was achieved by amino acid analysis (AAA) by double isotope dilution liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ID-MS/MS) following acid hydrolysis of the protein, in combination with ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometry (UV–Vis) based on tryptophan and tyrosine absorbance at 280 nm. Homogeneity of the material was established through spectrophotometric absorbance readings at 280 nm. Transportation and long-term storage stabilities were assessed by monitoring relative changes in oligomeric state by size-exclusion liquid chromatography (LC-SEC) with UV detection. The molar concentration of the spike protein in SMT1-1 was 5.68 ± 0.22 µmol L−1 (k = 2, 95% CI), with the native trimeric form accounting for ~ 94% of the relative abundance. Reference mass concentration and mass fraction values were calculated using the protein molecular weight and density of the SMT1-1 solution. The spike protein is highly glycosylated which leads to analyte ambiguity when reporting the more commonly used mass concentration. After glycoprotein molar mass determination by LC-SEC with multi-angle light scattering detection, we thus reported mass concentration values for both the protein-only portion and intact glycoprotein as 0.813 ± 0.030 and 1.050 ± 0.068 mg mL−1 (k = 2), respectively.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-022-04000-y.
Introduction<!>Chemicals and standards<!>Preparation of SMT1-1<!>Ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometry<!>Size-exclusion chromatography<!>Amino acid analysis by LC-ID-MS/MS<!><!>SMT1-1 stability<!><!>Reference value assignment and uncertainty evaluation of SMT1-1<!><!>Reference value assignment and uncertainty evaluation of SMT1-1<!>Molecular weight determination<!>Conclusions<!>
<p>The recently emerged SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is the causative agent of the current COVID-19 pandemic which has resulted in nearly 300 million infections and over five million deaths at the time of this report [1]. SARS-CoV-2 infects human airway epithelial cells via binding to the cell-surface receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2 [2]. The pathogen-host interaction is mediated by the viral spike protein, a multi-domain protein extensively decorated with complex glycans [3]. Neutralizing antibodies (Abs) recovered from plasma of convalescent COVID-19 patients, as well as therapeutic Abs, target various spike protein regions in addition to the attached sugars [4–7]. This multitude of binding modes illustrates the complexity of measuring the spike antibody-antigen interaction, which is the basis for many of the immunoassays currently available commercially.</p><p>Public health officials require reliable testing data to inform COVID-19 public policy. While nucleic acid-based diagnostics have been the gold standard, they are resource-intensive, requiring specialized equipment and trained personnel. To facilitate more extensive rapid testing capabilities, multiple point-of-care assays, namely antigen and antibody (serology) tests, have been developed. SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests strive to diagnose current infections by detecting the presence of viral proteins, i.e., spike, in patient samples with immobilized Abs. Conversely, antibody tests utilize immobilized viral proteins to capture Abs from patient serum resulting from a past infection and thus could be employed in viral surveillance programs. Serological assays benefit from ease-of-use and rapid sample turnaround time. However, due to the speed with which these tests have been developed and deployed, rigorous assessment of their accuracy is lacking [8] and the exact antigen/Ab structure often remains undisclosed which raises questions of comparability among manufacturers.</p><p>Protein reference materials offer significant advantages through supporting measurement accuracy and reliability of antigen and antibody test kits. Unlike small organic molecules, such as pharmaceuticals, with well-defined structures that can be accurately measured at high precision and accuracy, proteins typically require a range of advanced characterization techniques [9] that can yield larger uncertainties. While matrix reference materials of proteins of interest in serum or nasal fluid would be ideal for validation of test kits, purified proteins in solutions can be valuable as primary calibrators and can be spiked into appropriate matrices for simulating real samples [10].</p><p>The recent development of a SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid reference material allows for enhanced reliability of molecular diagnostics [11], yet to date, protein reference materials are lacking. To address this current lack of standardization in COVID-19 rapid testing, we have developed a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reference material, SMT1-1 [12]. This material is envisaged to serve as a standardized antigen source for antibody assays as well as a positive control for antigen tests. The production and characterization of this protein reference material will dramatically increase confidence in SARS-CoV-2 immunological testing results.</p><!><p>NRC CRMs ALEU-1 (leucine), APHE-1 (phenylalanine), and APRO-1 (proline) were used as primary standards for AAA [13]. The amino acid CRMs were assigned purity by quantitative 1H-NMR traceable to NIST potassium hydrogen phthalate (SRM 84L). Isoleucine and valine were purchased from Sigma (Oakville, ON). The corresponding isotope-labelled amino acids were sourced from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (CIL, Tewksbury, MA): [13C6]-leucine, [ring-13C6]-phenylalanine, [13C5]-proline, [13C6]-isoleucine, and [13C5]-valine. NIST recombinant humanized IgG1κ monoclonal antibody reference material (NISTmAb, RM 8671) was purchased from NIST (Gaithersburg, MD). Amino acid analysis grade 6 M hydrochloric acid was obtained from Sigma. Acetonitrile, ammonium acetate, phosphate buffered saline, and Tween-20 were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Nepean, ON). Glacial acetic acid was from ACP Chemicals (Montreal, QC) and HEPES sodium salt was purchased from Bioshop (Burlington, ON).</p><!><p>SARS-CoV-2 spike protein ectodomain mutant trimer was expressed and purified as described previously [14, 15]. The construct included a mutated S1/S2 furin cleavage site and the double proline substitution determined to maintain coronavirus spike proteins in the prefusion conformation [16, 17]. The trimerization domain of human resistin was fused to the C-terminus of the spike protein, followed by FLAG and hexahistidine affinity tags (Fig. S1). Mass spectrometry-based peptide mapping experiments on the deglycosylated protein resulted in > 94% sequence coverage (Fig. S2). The protein was received frozen in formulation buffer (DPBS supplemented with 2% HEPES sodium salt, pH 8). After thawing in a 25 °C water bath, the protein solution was dispensed in 1.2 mL aliquots into sterile 2 mL cryovials, labelled, and stored at − 80 °C.</p><!><p>Protein concentration in SMT1-1 was determined using a NanoDrop Onec (ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) UV–Visible spectrophotometer at 280 nm. Instrument performance was verified through analysis of ThermoFisher PV-1 solution, bovine serum albumin standard (Pierce), and NISTmAb. The instrument was blanked with SMT1-1 formulation buffer. Two µL SMT1-1 solution was pipetted onto the pedestal and the pathlength was set to 0.1 cm. Protein concentration was determined via the Beer-Lambert equation with an extinction coefficient of 140 320 M−1 cm−1, predicted from the spike amino acid sequence with 18 disulfide bonds [18].</p><!><p>Liquid chromatography was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC (Milford, MA) equipped with a BEHSEC 450 Å, 4.6 × 150 mm column, thermostatted at 30 °C. The autosampler was maintained at 4 °C. Ten µL (~ 8 µg) SMT1-1 was injected onto the column and eluted at 0.4 mL min−1 with formulation buffer supplemented with 0.02% Tween-20. Solvent was directed into the flow cell of a Waters Acquity eλ photodiode array detector operating at 280 nm with 1.2 nm resolution. Data analysis was done with MassLynx 4.1 software provided by the instrument manufacturer. Column and detector performance were confirmed with Waters BEH450 SEC standard protein mix and NISTmAb RM8671. Multi-angle light scattering (MALS) and refractive index (RI) data were collected using miniDAWN and Optilab T-rEX detectors, respectively (Wyatt, Santa Barbara, CA) and data were analyzed using the accompanying Astra software (version 6.1.7.17).</p><!><p>Amino acid stock solutions were prepared gravimetrically in ultrapure water. A calibration blend was formulated through combination of natural Ile, Leu, Phe, Pro, and Val stocks, with the final mole fractions mimicking those present in the spike protein sequence. To facilitate exact-matching isotope dilution, a corresponding blend of the 13C-labelled amino acids was prepared as internal standard. Equal amounts of the internal standard were then spiked into both the calibration blend and SMT1-1, followed by liquid phase acid hydrolysis in 6 M HCl. The solutions were heated at 110 °C for 72 h to ensure complete peptide bond cleavage [19, 20], then allowed to cool to room temperature. A 40 μL aliquot of each solution was diluted to 1 mL prior to LC–MS/MS analysis. A NISTmAb RM 8671 sample was prepared in parallel as a quality control, after a tenfold dilution of the initial concentrated solution.</p><p>Analyte separation was achieved using an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC (ThermoFisher Scientific) employing a ZIC-HILIC column (Canadian Life Science, 100 × 2.1 mm, 3.5 μm) heated to 35 °C. Mobile phases were respectively (A) 10 mM ammonium acetate in water with pH adjusted to 3.5 using glacial acetic acid and (B) 10 mM ammonium acetate in ACN. Two μL injections were used and separated isocratically with 88% B at 0.25 mL min−1. Eluting amino acids were directed into the heated electrospray source of a Thermo Quantiva triple quadrupole MS operating in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Compound specific parameters were first optimized by infusing individual amino acid standards: ion transitions (Q1/Q3), collision energy (CE), and radio-frequency (RF) values used are shown in Table S1. The ESI spray voltage was set to + 4400 V and the sheath, auxiliary, and sweep gas flows were 25, 17, and 1, respectively (arbitrary units). The ion transfer tube and vaporizer temperatures were set to 325 and 280 °C, respectively. Peak areas were extracted using Xcalibur software from the instrument manufacturer.</p><p>Quantitation of each amino acid in the sample (wA) was achieved using the following double isotope dilution equation [21]:1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				sepackage{amsmath}
				sepackage{wasysym} 
				sepackage{amsfonts} 
				sepackage{amssymb} 
				sepackage{amsbsy}
				sepackage{mathrsfs}
				sepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				egin{document}$$w_{\mathrm A}=w_{\mathrm A^st}\cdotrac{r_{\mathrm A^st}-r_{\mathrm A^st\mathrm B}}{r_{\mathrm A^st\mathrm B}-r_{\mathrm B}}\cdotrac{r_{\mathrm B}-r_{\mathrm{AB}}}{r_{\mathrm{AB}}-r_{\mathrm A^st}}\cdotrac{m_{\mathrm A^st\left(\mathrm A^st\mathrm B
ight)}}{m_{\mathrm B\left(\mathrm A^st\mathrm B
ight)}}\cdotrac{m_{\mathrm B\left(\mathrm{AB}
ight)}}{m_{\mathrm A\left(\mathrm{AB}
ight)}}$$\end{document}wA=wA*·rA*-rA*BrA*B-rB·rB-rABrAB-rA*·mA*A*BmBA*B·mBABmAAB</p><p>where A represents the analyte in the sample, A* the primary standard (natural amino acid), B the internal standard (labelled amino acid), A*B the calibration blend, and AB the sample blend. Symbols w, r, and m denote the mass fraction, the measured isotope amount ratio, and the mass of solution, respectively. Validation of this technique has been demonstrated in inter-laboratory comparisons [22, 23], and has facilitated purity assessment of multiple peptide RMs [24–26].</p><!><p>Normalized protein content in fifteen randomly selected SMT1-1 units. Data points and error bars represent averages and standard deviations, respectively, of triplicate technical replicates. Dotted line is the average molar concentration determined by A280 and dashed lines indicate standard uncertainty (k = 1)</p><p>Size-exclusion UV chromatograms of a molecular weight standard protein mix, and b SMT1-1. Peak labels in a indicate molecular weights in kilodaltons. Inset in b shows zoom-in on SMT1-1 elution, highlighting regions integrated for the spike protein trimer as well as high- and low-molecular weight species. Molar mass values (red circles, right axis) from MALS detection are overlaid on SMT1-1 peak</p><p>Relative spike trimer amount in SMT1-1 under various storage conditions. Trimer percentage from a isochronous short-term stability and b long-term stability studies. Reference refers to sample stored at − 80 °C for duration of isochronous study. Values result from triplicate measurements of two units per condition. Data points and error bars represent averages and standard deviations, respectively. The dotted line indicates the average trimer percentage. Dashed lines represent a ± 1% range and are intended for visualization purposes only</p><!><p>The long-term stability of SMT1-1 was determined by supplementing the above data with those from samples stored at − 80 °C for 5 weeks and 7 and 12 months, and at − 20 °C for 7 and 11 months. No significant changes in trimer abundance were detected (Fig. 3b). Extrapolation from the Bayesian ANOVA discussed above supplemented with the long-term data resulted in a stability uncertainty component of 0.04 µmol L−1 for 3 years storage at − 20 °C, providing the basis for the anticipated expiry period of the material.</p><!><p>Freeze–thaw effects on protein size heterogeneity in SMT1-1. Relative amounts of a trimer and b high- and low-molecular weight species as a function of freeze–thaw cycle number. Two SMT1-1 units were used for each condition and analyzed in triplicate. Data points and error bars represent averages and standard deviations, respectively</p><!><p>SMT1-1 is a reference material assessed for spike protein content. The reference value reported for spike protein molar concentration combined determinations from two orthogonal methods: UV–Vis spectrophotometry and amino acid analysis ID-MS. Measurements were performed on the same 15 units used for the homogeneity assessment in addition to a NISTmAb quality control sample. Both the UV–Vis ID-MS techniques are sensitive to the presence of host-cell proteins (HCPs), in this case CHO cell proteins co-purified with the spike protein. We were able to detect low-level HCPs in SMT1-1, similar to work on other CHO-based biologics [28]; however, we did not perform detailed quantitation. Therefore, akin to the NISTmAb reference material, we did not include a purity correction for HCPs.</p><!><p>Reference values and expanded uncertainties (k = 2, 95% CI) for SMT1-1</p><p>aSpike protein amino acid sequence only, 143 192 ± 1 g mol−1</p><p>bSpike protein plus best estimate of total glycan mass, 184 000 ± 10 000 g mol−1</p><!><p>Initial SMT1-1 quantitation utilized molar concentrations as these generally do not depend on protein post-translational modifications; absorbance at 280 nm is predominantly mediated by tryptophan and tyrosine side chains. Nevertheless, many protein laboratories routinely work with mass concentrations (mg mL−1) rather than molarities which spurred us to also provide such values for SMT1-1. For many proteins this is a simple calculation involving the molecular weight, however the extensive glycosylation of the spike protein introduces ambiguity regarding the analyte in question, as discussed in the ensuing section.</p><!><p>The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein sequence contains 22 potential N-glycosylation sites per monomer (Fig. S1). MS-based glycoproteomic studies have been applied to determine both the glycan occupancy and composition at each site [30–32], with the total glycan mass per trimer totalling 90–105 kDa. The N-glycosylation profile has been shown to differ dramatically depending on the protein construct employed, i.e., full-length spike, S1 domain, or receptor binding domain [33, 34], and the cell type used for recombinant protein production. Recent charge detection MS measurements of the intact spike trimer indicate a glycan mass ~ 40% higher [35] than that reported in proteomic studies, akin to the discrepancy observed for erythropoietin [36].</p><p>Calculating the theoretical molecular weight (MW) of a protein is a straightforward exercise, combining the elemental composition of the amino acid sequence and the corresponding IUPAC atomic weights [37], and accurate experimental MW determination of intact proteins with LC–MS has become routine. Mass spectrometry facilitates detection of well-defined post-translational modifications, such as acetylation and phosphorylation, however the notoriously heterogeneous nature of N-glycosylation significantly increases measurement uncertainty when even a small number of labelling sites are present within the protein sequence. This is apparent through comparison of both the m/z- and deconvoluted mass spectra of native and deglycosylated spike (calculated MW = 143 214 ± 1 g mol−1) shown in Figure S5.</p><p>Size-exclusion chromatography coupled with UV detection was utilized to determine the size heterogeneity of SMT1-1. Calibrants used for SEC are generally globular, non-glycosylated proteins. However, the SARS-CoV-2 spike in SMT1-1 is highly glycosylated and stabilized in an elongated conformation [3, 14, 38]. These factors predictably alter protein SEC elution profiles [39], causing the spike trimer MW to be over-estimated by nearly 100% (Fig. 2b). Additionally, the large peak width in comparison to those of the calibrants reflects the heterogeneous nature of the glycosylation [35]. Recent work utilizing SEC separation coupled with MALS and differential refractive index (dRI) detection was able to accurately determine the MW of the extensively glycosylated HIV-1 envelope trimer [40]. We therefore measured SMT1-1 by SEC-MALS (Fig. 2b) and determined an intensity-weighted trimer molar mass of approximately 551 kDa. This value implies ~ 122 kDa glycan present on the spike trimer in SMT1-1, which falls between the values calculated from glycoproteomics (~ 100 kDa) and charge detection MS studies (~ 135 kDa) [35]. Mass concentration (mg mL−1) of the spike glycoprotein monomer in SMT1-1 was thus calculated from the molar concentration using a best estimate molecular mass of 184 000 ± 10 000 g mol−1. The ~ 5% uncertainty (k = 2) in the molar mass of the spike glycoprotein comes from the standard deviation of replicate SEC-MALS analyses, and reflects the heterogeneity in glycoforms across the SEC elution peak. Mass concentrations were converted to mass fractions using a density value of 1.007 ± 0.008 g mL−1, measured on the actual SMT1-1 solution.</p><!><p>While vaccinations have reduced mortality associated with COVID-19, infection diagnostics and viral surveillance remain critical aspects of the global pandemic response. Rapid testing kits, both antigen- and antibody-based, play a key role in diagnosing current and prior SARS-CoV-2 infections. As a result, over 150 such tests have been authorized for use in the USA and Canada alone [41, 42], however comparability between manufacturers remains unclear. We have characterized a spike protein reference material, SMT1-1, envisaged to be used as a standard protein source for developing SARS-CoV-2 serological and antigen tests. SMT1-1 can also be used as a SI-traceable calibrator in the development of spike protein quantitation assays.</p><!><p>Supplementary file1 (DOCX 691 KB)</p><p>Publisher's note</p><p>Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>