President-elect Trump’s plan to dismantle the Department of Education faces significant legal hurdles, experts warn.
At a Glance
- Trump aims to abolish the Department of Education and return education responsibilities to states.
- Legal experts say Trump would need congressional approval, including a supermajority in the Senate.
- The DOE has been a target for dismantling by Republicans since its establishment in 1979.
- Trump’s alternative could be appointing a department head aligned with his vision to minimize its influence.
Trump’s Bold Education Plan Faces Constitutional Roadblocks
President-elect Donald Trump has made waves with his recent announcement to dismantle the Department of Education (DOE), a move that aligns with long-standing Republican desires. However, legal experts are quick to point out that such a significant change would require more than just presidential willpower.
“One thing I’ll be doing very early in the administration is closing up the Department of Education in Washington, D.C., and sending all education and education work it needs back to the states,” Trump declared, echoing a sentiment popular among conservatives who view the department as an example of federal overreach.
Constitutional Hurdles and Political Realities
Despite Trump’s determination, the path to dismantling the DOE is fraught with constitutional challenges. Legal experts emphasize that such a move would require congressional approval, specifically a supermajority in the Senate – a feat that seems nearly impossible in the current political climate.
“President Trump does not have the ability to eliminate a federal department. Eliminating it would require congressional action, including a supermajority of 60 votes in the Senate. So, even if Trump can follow through with what he says, he has to pull in some Democrats in the Senate, and that will likely be impossible.” – Andrew Stoltmann
This constitutional requirement presents a significant obstacle to Trump’s plans, as it would necessitate bipartisan support in an increasingly polarized political landscape.
Historical Context and Republican Ambitions
The desire to dismantle the DOE is not unique to Trump. Since its establishment by President Carter in 1979, the department has been a target for Republican leaders who favor local control over education. Former President Reagan also advocated for abolishing the DOE, reflecting a long-standing conservative stance on federal involvement in education.
Despite these historical efforts, the DOE has persisted, overseeing crucial federal programs and playing a significant role in education policy nationwide.
Potential Alternatives and Impact
Given the challenges of outright dismantling the DOE, Trump may opt for alternative strategies to reshape federal education policy. One approach could be appointing a department head aligned with his vision to effectively minimize its influence without entirely abolishing the agency.
This approach could lead to significant changes in federal education policy without requiring the legislative hurdles of dismantling the entire department. However, such moves could face resistance from various stakeholders, including local school districts and superintendents who rely on federal funding and support.
While President-elect Trump’s ambition to dismantle the Department of Education aligns with long-standing Republican goals, the constitutional and political realities present significant challenges. As the administration prepares to take office, the education community and political observers will be watching closely to see how Trump navigates these obstacles and what changes may come to federal education policy in the years ahead.
- Trump would need congressional approval to dissolve Education Department, experts say
- Can Trump dismantle the Department of Education? It won’t be easy, experts say
- Could Trump actually get rid of the Department of Education?
- Dismantling the Department of Education? Trump’s plan for schools in his second term
- Can Trump Really Dismantle the Department of Education?