File size: 5,586 Bytes
b1190f3 91f113b b1190f3 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 |
---
annotations_creators:
- expert-generated
language_creators:
- found
languages:
- code
licenses:
- other-C-UDA
multilinguality:
- other-programming-languages
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
source_datasets:
- original
task_categories:
- conditional-text-generation
task_ids:
- conditional-text-generation-other-debugging
pretty_name: CodeXGlueCcCodeRefinement
---
# Dataset Card for "code_x_glue_cc_code_refinement"
## Table of Contents
- [Dataset Description](#dataset-description)
- [Dataset Summary](#dataset-summary)
- [Supported Tasks and Leaderboards](#supported-tasks)
- [Languages](#languages)
- [Dataset Structure](#dataset-structure)
- [Data Instances](#data-instances)
- [Data Fields](#data-fields)
- [Data Splits](#data-splits-sample-size)
- [Dataset Creation](#dataset-creation)
- [Curation Rationale](#curation-rationale)
- [Source Data](#source-data)
- [Annotations](#annotations)
- [Personal and Sensitive Information](#personal-and-sensitive-information)
- [Considerations for Using the Data](#considerations-for-using-the-data)
- [Social Impact of Dataset](#social-impact-of-dataset)
- [Discussion of Biases](#discussion-of-biases)
- [Other Known Limitations](#other-known-limitations)
- [Additional Information](#additional-information)
- [Dataset Curators](#dataset-curators)
- [Licensing Information](#licensing-information)
- [Citation Information](#citation-information)
- [Contributions](#contributions)
## Dataset Description
- **Homepage:** https://github.com/microsoft/CodeXGLUE/tree/main/Code-Code/code-refinement
### Dataset Summary
CodeXGLUE code-refinement dataset, available at https://github.com/microsoft/CodeXGLUE/tree/main/Code-Code/code-refinement
We use the dataset released by this paper(https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.08693.pdf). The source side is a Java function with bugs and the target side is the refined one. All the function and variable names are normalized. Their dataset contains two subsets ( i.e.small and medium) based on the function length.
### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
- `conditional-text-generation-other-debugging`: The dataset can be used to train a model for automatically fixing buggy code.
### Languages
- Java **programming** language
## Dataset Structure
### Data Instances
#### medium
An example of 'train' looks as follows.
```
{
"buggy": "public static TYPE_1 init ( java.lang.String name , java.util.Date date ) { TYPE_1 VAR_1 = new TYPE_1 ( ) ; VAR_1 . METHOD_1 ( name ) ; java.util.Calendar VAR_2 = java.util.Calendar.getInstance ( ) ; VAR_2 . METHOD_2 ( date ) ; VAR_1 . METHOD_3 ( VAR_2 ) ; return VAR_1 ; }\n",
"fixed": "public static TYPE_1 init ( java.lang.String name , java.util.Date date ) { TYPE_1 VAR_1 = new TYPE_1 ( ) ; VAR_1 . METHOD_1 ( name ) ; java.util.Calendar VAR_2 = null ; if ( date != null ) { VAR_2 = java.util.Calendar.getInstance ( ) ; VAR_2 . METHOD_2 ( date ) ; } VAR_1 . METHOD_3 ( VAR_2 ) ; return VAR_1 ; }\n",
"id": 0
}
```
#### small
An example of 'validation' looks as follows.
```
{
"buggy": "public java.util.List < TYPE_1 > METHOD_1 ( ) { java.util.ArrayList < TYPE_1 > VAR_1 = new java.util.ArrayList < TYPE_1 > ( ) ; for ( TYPE_2 VAR_2 : VAR_3 ) { VAR_1 . METHOD_2 ( VAR_2 . METHOD_1 ( ) ) ; } return VAR_1 ; } \n",
"fixed": "public java.util.List < TYPE_1 > METHOD_1 ( ) { return VAR_1 ; } \n",
"id": 0
}
```
### Data Fields
In the following each data field in go is explained for each config. The data fields are the same among all splits.
#### medium, small
|field name| type | description |
|----------|------|--------------------------------|
|id |int32 | Index of the sample |
|buggy |string| The buggy version of the code |
|fixed |string| The correct version of the code|
### Data Splits
| name |train|validation|test|
|------|----:|---------:|---:|
|medium|52364| 6546|6545|
|small |46680| 5835|5835|
## Dataset Creation
### Curation Rationale
[More Information Needed]
### Source Data
#### Initial Data Collection and Normalization
Downloaded from GitHub Archive every public GitHub event between March 2011 and October 2017 and used the Google BigQuery APIs.
[More Information Needed]
#### Who are the source language producers?
Software Engineering developers.
### Annotations
#### Annotation process
Automatically annotated by filtering commit messages containing the pattern: ("fix" or "solve") and ("bug" or "issue" or "problem" or "error"). A statistically significant amount of samples (95% confidence level with 5% confidence interval) were manually evaluated by two authors to check if the filtered bug/fix pairs were correct. After all disagreements were settled, authors conclude that 97.6% were true positives.
#### Who are the annotators?
Heuristics and the authors of the paper.
### Personal and Sensitive Information
[More Information Needed]
## Considerations for Using the Data
### Social Impact of Dataset
[More Information Needed]
### Discussion of Biases
[More Information Needed]
### Other Known Limitations
[More Information Needed]
## Additional Information
### Dataset Curators
https://github.com/microsoft, https://github.com/madlag
### Licensing Information
Computational Use of Data Agreement (C-UDA) License.
### Citation Information
```
@article{CodeXGLUE,
title={CodeXGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset and Open Challenge for Code Intelligence},
year={2020},}
```
### Contributions
Thanks to @madlag (and partly also @ncoop57) for adding this dataset.
|