> does not mention half of the english translations do.   en/romans%2015%3a27 what does it say in the original greek?   jews wouldn't care about romans killing roman prophets. anyway, you're reading it like a historical account, but you should be reading it like a mythological account. look up the yom kippur ritual, and compare the "no broken bones" comment about jesus etc. it's pretty obvious. the subsequent "le judaism bad" in the bible are later additions by saul and his gang, when they were trying to push what they perceived as a subversive sect of judaism unto the goyim, to harm rome and protect jews from it. i recommend the work of adam green or laurent guyenot.   > i did answer your question no, you made weasely politician-noises. it's a simple yes or no question, and i see no yes or no. so, once again: > does that godly authority have to be yahweh, the lord of zion and foreskin-demanding holocaust enjoyer?
Spain