> it's evident this is either malicious ignorance or you're trolling me. you never even bothered to go and figure out what all the le bad guys believed? you were content to just sit there, never having understood their perspective, all the while unwilling to put yourself in their shoes and assume their frame of mind? their frame of mind is evil and wrong, but i can imagine it, faggot. > this is why people clearly haven't been very inclined to help you. this is why the faggots further up say normalfags like you don't deserve to be helped. meh, the faggot further up are beneath me, simple as. > you can't even fucking bother to go read a book that might challenge your beliefs. you're exactly like what i described in my first post. lot's of assumptions here, you're really just mad because i haven't read the books you think are relevant to the overall mythology of the discussion. hint, it doesn't matter, these retarded niggers needs to get destroyed anyway. > this behavior is obscene and unwarranted. you should feel bad about this. lol you sound gay. fucking "obscence" lmao. > who convinced you they're so competent? a bunch of boring virgin autists beat them. a bunch of retards. what does that say about how inept they are? where in the world did you get it that i think they're competent? > i think you're pretending we're on a different team so it's easier to disagree with me for challenging your beliefs, making you think i wouldn't be asking the exact same questions. these assumptions are presumptuous and incorrect. what in the flying fuck are you even rambling about? where are you getting all these presumptions about me? i think they're retarded enough to talk about moloch in their emails, because they're arrogant and didn't expect wikileaks.
Norway