> i never suggested otherwise. yes you did. sneeringly as well. here:   > yes. that's how we know that abrahamism is sheer nonsense.     > this was the essence of my critique of the fatalist cyclical worldview of traditionalism then it isn't fatalist, because there is hope for a better time. if a man holds the torch of tradition against the tides of darkness then he is performing a vital function for the wellbeing of man as a whole. if he had no hope then he wouldn't bother clinging to traditions nor would he see the importance of spreading the knowledge of his beliefs.     > you know this how? there is no end to the eternal nor can free will be suspended as it is an essential characteristic of the monad and his creations. oh? since there is no end then you must be a fatalist as well.
United States