but they are shit, because a weapon has to have a purpose integrated with tactics, operations, and theater considerations. nato equipment is entirely based around 'wunderwaffen' concept that pinnacle quality outweighs quantity. but what quality? these weapons are not designed for any particular purpose, beyond profit, so it's a category error to speak of quality. for example, the marine and navy f35b&c are utter shit and depend on the even shittier osprey to receive replacement engines. artillery pieces with titanium barrels. the list goes on and on.
United States