> you either believe it, or not no, you can look at the historical trends and understand the differences, you either actually study them or not you retard. > going for the classic euhemeristic attack on gentile european religions aka "oh they were all worshiping divinized humans" how is it ephemistic? the greeks literally write themselves as being descended from prometheus himself. prometheus warns the humans of the flood, and his son deucallion replenishes the world, including hellen, the father of the greeks. his own father iapetus is just yapeth, son of noah, in the bible. ypt. you're making up rules about what 'divine' means instead of examining history and acting like there's some sort of 'fairness' to believing them all equally like a dumbass. you can see both refer to the same history, and both use metaphor. the question is do you think the greeks themselve sare descended from a god who is described like a human over the bible which presents humans as just human? you aren't comparing their mythologies, you're just arguing about a universalist belief in all religions like some commie jew. do you really study pagan myth and monotheistic myth and not see these patterns? its so embarrassing for you. you also act like i demonize pagan myth and i don't, i study them more than the bible, but the point is to see the truth they all allude to and the truth is not that there were all these thunder gods running around doing actions we can clearly see were human groups. they were guided by god but they ended up defining themselves as gods.
United States