you are completely misrepresenting what i said. my first post said that the social contract was between men and allowed lower tier men to reproduce and contribute to society. obviously i can't list how every hypothetical contract in every hypothetical group first existed and then changed as they merged into larger nations.  the contract is what ensures reproduction beyond something only the top 20% of men get to do. it doesn't matter if there are shield maidens or austere 14th century worshippers. those are the circumstances of the contract, not its substance. the sexual revolution, prepared by allowing women en masse into the workforce, and the subsequent modern dating scene broke the social contract, and every system built upon it, including the patriarchy and whatsoever economic system may be current, will collapse.
United States