no. besides technicalities which only matter formally and won't ever result in meaningful sanctions, they are impervious to legal action. matter of fact: all corporations of relevance (especially pfizer) have perfected their grift. they just need to plea guilty with a subsidary and pay a pittance. the second line of defense after indem it is the liability of the practioners who administer the mystery goo injections: the manufacturer may have provided unadultered poison, but the practioner administered it. that's why you are ought to sign the waiver and why, unless the practitioner provides his own pertaining to his person and buisness for you to sign, the practitioner is a human meatshield. the third line of defense are unions and guilds -- i.e. anyone in a particular profession has a vested interest to not hold the individual practitioner accountable to avoid a precedence that could be used to bankrupt all of them for this case (or others). the fourth line of defense is shared responsibility with other demographics (advertisers etc) and the blackmail that comes of it.
Germany