> you are asking me to prove a negative.  i mean, your claim that it doesn't matter how old is a country. i find that claim baseless, of course it matters. in fact, longevity of nation's history shows it's compentence to deal with various historical challenges. older countries are inherently superior > why does your country being stuck in the past ignoring the present and future denote superiority of some kind?  i don't see how that's being "stuck in the past" if anyone is stuck in the past it's us, still desperately holding to "founding fathers" and their values from 300 years ago
Serbia