oh, of course, who needs education when you havegut feelings? who cares about years of rigorous study, specialized training, and peer-reviewed evidence when your magical ability to skim abstracts and watch youtube videos clearly trumps the combined expertise of professionals whove dedicated their lives to understanding a field? silly scientists, wasting decades in school when all they needed was the confidence to declare themselves experts on the internet. heres the thing: understanding and properly evaluating scientific research is not like reading the back of a cereal box. it requires a foundation in scientific methodology, statistics, and domain-specific knowledge. the average research paper is filled with technical jargon, complex methodologies, and nuanced data analysisnone of which magically become understandable without years of formal education and experience. for example, a biologist who judges a physics paper is likely to miss critical aspects, let alone someone without any background at all. it takes years to learn how to critically evaluate study design, statistical methods, biases, and reproducibility. scientists spend half their careers debating over details most casual readers wouldnt even notice. but sure, lets pretend your primary school education and a biased quick google search qualify you to dismiss or validate years of peer-reviewed research.
Greece