yes, if you explain to it that you're writing fiction and you need help with something it's much more lenient. it used to overdo it, how they were fine tuning these llms was humans had some sample questions with responses like "it's never acceptable to be racist". which caused it to act super retarded (see pic related). they've since "fixed" that by using better examples. another trick is to change the setting, so while it would refuse something negative about brown people, maybe they're orcs in a fantasy setting. or the jews are like goblin's in gringotts. then you can get it to make conclusions that it hasn't been fine tuned to be instructed to treat them like a protected group.   chatgpt and other models tend to be very bad at these types of questions. the only one i would trust is ones that are plugged into a search engine. and it's not because i trust google or bing, it's just that you can at least see where it got its answer from (the article/study). otherwise these things will tend to just hallucinate and give you an answer that is in the format you wanted but the figures are just made up. copy and paste in the start of some legal document (which has got some legalese), especially some recent public court record. then you'll see, it will do a good job of generating text which is very plausible, it will even generate text which looks plausible, but the meat of the document is just stuff which never happened, but it looks real, it's coming up with valid felony names and details like this but it's stuff which didn't happen.
Ireland