> yea our scientists are super smart > i dont know any of the science but im sure they're smart because they are scientists > no im not in a cult where i have blind faith in the cult of scientism.. we just actually have really smart scientists that proved all this stuff > no i dont know any of how they proved it, but they did alright! because nobody disproved them on my youtube feed yet!  if only you knew how "top level science" worked, how much of it is based on bullshit, how hard they only fund and push for research that supports their claim, how much they throw out you realize all top level astrophysicists can't even admit that its provable that earth is moving right?  "so which is real, the ptolemaic or copernican system? although it is not uncommon for people to say that copernicus proved ptolemy wrong, that is not true... one can use either picture as a model of the universe, for our observations of the heavens can be explained by assuming either the earth or the sun to be at rest - stephen hawking 2008 we know that the difference between a heliocentric theory and a geocentric theory is one of relative motion only, and that such a difference has no physical signifiance - astronomer fred hoyle (astronomy and cosmology - a modern course (san francisco: w.h. freeman & co, 1975) p. 416 "the struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of ptolemy and copernicus would then be quite meaningless. either coordinate system could be used with equal justification, the two sentences, "the sun is at rest and the earth moves" or "the sun moves and the earth is at rest" would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different coordinate systems - albert einstein, einstein and infeld, the evolution of physics, 1938 ed p. 248 etc i can go on forever but the fact is you dont care, you dont want your opinion changed, you want to live in blind faith ignorant to reality because you cant accept you were deceived as a kid
Canada