> they just use endless senseless appeals to identity politics not an argument. you're dismissing the critical fulcrum point of race on issues like this not because it isn't true, but because of ideological reasons. you're not refuting or addressing anything. you're just putting on horseblinders on to get around dealing with an inconvenient illliberal truth. this in itself sort of proves the point that "identity politics" are as part of reality as air and water, and your refusal to confront it is a confession of insecurity.
United States