it appears there was a war which may or may not be reflected somewhere in traditional tales, where the leading royal family of aryans was killed and the remnant struggled to hold the society together especially due to defection from half-breeds.  i don't think ancient aryans minded interbreeding, as they appeared to do it everywhere, i think they simply had traditions in place to keep their core royal line separate. knowing the same thing we know today: non-white people just, it seems genetically, don't understand or care about morality and truth telling. high whites do seem to care about it a lot, just from birth. i think this observation had more to do with a desire to keep separate societies than anything. however, once the "royal" line was defeated, especially in india, people gave up. i have some theories, for instance i think one of the later aryan schisms led to the mitanni to migrate to assyria from india. my theory is that they actually exercised sovereignty over the hatti and assyrians and partially over the hyksos in egypt until a betrayal, so history doesn't understand the breadth of their power, seeing them as a petty hurrian principality. hittites are weird. the hittites are actually neshians who rebuilt hattusa and took its name, where the inhabitants of hattusa, the hatti, are a different ethnicity. history is weird like this, it uses the wrong names. the city of nimrod was actually never called that until the 19th century due to biblical obsession. it was the capital of middle assyria and founded by the guy who defeated the mitanni. it was called kalhu (in the bible, calah). kalhu, chaldeans, kali shiva? the elamites were literally dravidian. the kassites were indian but of unknown type. i mean, history has just completely fucked up how we see this stuff.
United States