> your set x is just "gnostic" there's no reason to make new terminology, this is well established by x = "i know," for a more detailed explanation, this refers to stances related to the existence of god, regardless of whether they are derived through knowledge or belief. in this context, x aligns with those who claim knowledge or a definitive stance on the existence of a creator or divine being. people in the x set could be considered gnostic, as they assert that they know something about the nature of existence or the divine, whether through belief or empirical evidence. thats why you fall under x. you are an agnostic atheist toward the existence of a creator as described by various religions, meaning you do not know but lean toward disbelief in that specific concept of god. however, you may still leave room for other possibilities like the idea of a turtle carrying the universe. in contrast, i fall under set y, which represents a position of agnosticism not just toward the concept of a specific creator but toward all possibilities regarding what reality truly is. unlike x, where one may assert knowledge or belief about a certain aspect of existence, i do not claim any stance on what could or could not be true about the nature of reality. therefore, the key difference is that x involves a position where knowledge or belief is claimed about the existence of some "x" (which could be a creator, deity, or other fundamental aspect of existence)
Philippines