> but owning the libs is completely positive in nearly all aspects. however, modern libs aren't actually liberal at all but they sure love to grift off of the moniker rush limbaugh gave them.  equating leftist with liberals does not make them the same. > owning the libs is about rejecting the totalitarian progressives who are fully invest in neoliberalism and corporate welfare which is unsurprising since their entire political pov is about homosexuality and following the script that vanguard and blackrock gives them via late night re-education sessions such as stephen colbert and jimmy kimmel. and i suppose right-wing oligarchy and isolationism, with a tinge of christian nationalist supremacy, is a better remedy for the country as a whole?
United States