listen nignog, if i can't fucking even say the words "suicide", "dead", or "killed", or talk about peer-reviewed medical reports relating to the mrna gene therapies, on most social media sites, do you think any of those sites will allow any type of material that shows rotting dead fucking bodies from a natural disaster (that the moderators are getting extreme orders from on high to absolutely not show because it would be "helping bad actors to be able to spread harmful narratives and bolster misinformation")? those hardened censorshipers who have been weeded out and battle-hardened through the 2020 elections "disinfo" and the covid release and vaccine rollout? those die-hard supporters of the status quo who know exactly what showing any dead bodies from this disaster on their platform would mean for a coming election? there are entire branches of the federal government designated for controlling narratives and censoring things in times like this (remember nina jankowitz and the proposed "disinformation governance agency" (   formation_governance_board ); sure it was never official created, but the intent is laid bare-facedly there, and that all just means that their same censorship mission is now being carried out by multiple federal agencies and "private entities"). there is a branch of people tangentially related to the dhs and fema who specifically are now trying to wage a "counter dis-information war" online over these topics. and that's even getting into if any private citizen (that is even good enough condition to able to go out their looking for bodies), would want to post it to the whole wide-world on the internet (most absolutely would not want to do such a highly 'disrespectful thing' to their once former neighbors and now deceased friends and family). if they were taking pics of bodies, it would mostly be for sharing locally to figure out identities and bring closure for the families.
United States