we are ethnically european. our ancestors had been proto-europeans. some of whom did end up as far as india and north africa but they had been mutted to oblivion and are gone. in the same way a half african is not european. different european ethnic groups make up the european family/peoples. english, french, german, italian, american, canadian ect. our ethnic groups have unique compositions based on the ratios of celtic, germanic, nordic, slavic and latin heritage. americans are ethnic europeans who are born and raised in america. america wouldnt be exactly the same nation as it is if you settled it with greeks and people from the balkans. therefore a better description for the american ethnicity would be celtic-germanic with a small portion of slavic and latin admixture. therefore the americans are a distinct european ethnicity with a homeland in north america. as such you must consider the american population as its own ethnic group composed of people who are mostly celto-germanic. therefore you must exclude people who dont belong to this collective and produce representation for your collective. from this base you can reach the point of america for the americans. as america was founded by this ethnic group. therefore it is your homeland. by trying to broaden your collective to such a point that everyone is inside of it. you end up invalidating the collective. if you have no ethnic identity you will have no collective and therefore no representation. if you have no representation you are no different to cattle being bred for slaughter. we need to act like a family of nations working together. not a giant consolidated mass of rootless slaves. when there are a hundred families within a village do they lose their individual identity? they don't. as such do ethnic groups have to lose their identity to work together for a collective benefit?
United Kingdom