> they can indeed claim whatever they wish, but they are wrong as the historical record demonstrates. if the historical documents were that clear, this wouldn't be a church-splitting issue to begin with. history is, as usual, a matter of interpretation. > again, subjective means 1) based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions or 2) dependent on the mind or on an individual's perception for its existence. interpretation is the action of explaining the meaning of something. i've already debunked this before. your definition of interpretation matches your definition of subjective. > you may have the last word. oh you're a clever little weasel, aren't you? you know you're losing so you pull this move to save face.
Serbia