the shit hitler painted lacked any soul, emotion, creativity, or spark of passion. have you ever been to a local art exhibit and seen the vast array of mediocre, if artistically serviceable paintings that locals have put together? that's basically the quality that hitler operated under. the illustrations he made belonged on postcards, not high art museums. they were derivative, uninteresting, and, to be blunt, not in the "scene" of where the world of high art was at the time. he was a dime a dozen, nothing special, no real imagination. he was never going to be the next van gogh, and that's not even getting into the technical mistakes he so often fell into... the most you could say about hitler's work is that you can tell he had an appreciation and admiration of architecture, which is what the art school who rejected him recommended he go into.
United States