> explain, specifically, what issue you take with the post you just replied to it's a gish gallop of flawed reductionism,. lazy and easy for you to spew nonsense that would take a lot of time and effort to refute all of it. specifically you incorrectly and stupidly label all speech of any sort as propaganda, which is trivially proved wrong for example by the declaration of independence which was not merely propaganda. you are promoting a stupid view of the world that fails to distinguish between things that are different. thus it makes the world harder to actually understand and reason correctly about, but much easier to spread lies that sound good. that is the issue i take with your post. you are and idiot and you spread idiocy.
United States