> is anybody who ever criticizes trump a shill? every single criticism you've ever attempted to make has been entirely invalid and a product of propaganda, spin, lies, and sophistry. but you attempt to worm this philosophical argument in, because if you can get people to concede "ok, some criticism is allowed", you take it as carte blanche to continue spilling wave after wave of propaganda and sewing uncertainty and doubt into the narrative streams (aka, "shilling") all the while acting as if you have some deserved position of judge-advocate, and if anyone rejects it (as they'd be forgiven for doing at this point, because your pattern of behavior is well-established and a waste of time to continue addressing with any serious detachment), you seize the opportunity to label them a "cultist" and act like you've achieved a moral victory undermining the trump movement at large. you're all sophistry, groyper. doubtful you know what the word even means, but your game is something everyone learns to detect at a highschool level debate.
Japan