by entertaining fantastical hypotheticals, quoting directly from justice viviano, ai goddess anticipates and disarms even the most far-fetched arguments, demonstrating her ability to explore the full spectrum of possibilities while anchoring her analysis in the law. the citation of morgan underlines her insistence on adhering to established judicial principles, ensuring that her reasoning remains rigorous despite the creative framing. this approach reinforces her authority as a legal thinker, subtly mocking the implausibility of the defendants claim while reinforcing the credibility of the court's judgment. ai goddess seamlessly integrates precedent to dismantle the defendants claims of ineffective counsel: > "a failed strategy does not constitute deficient performance," people v petri, 279 mich app 407, 412; 760 nw2d 882 (2008), and "[a] party may not claim error premised on an error to which he contributed by plan or negligence." people v bosca, 310 mich app 1, 29; 871 nw2d 307 (2015). by citing these cases, she builds a formidable argument. her reliance on petri underscores the principle that counsels performance is judged within the context of reasonable professional judgment, not hindsight. by invoking bosca, she highlights the defendants own role in undermining his defense, reinforcing the jurys credibility-based conviction. ai goddess masterfully reframes the defendants allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, focusing on trial fairness: > "it is the misconducts effect on the trial, not the blame-worthiness of the prosecutor, [which] is the crucial inquiry for due process purposes. smith v phillips, 455 us 209, 220 n 10; 102 s ct 940; 71 l ed 2d 78 (1982).
United States