nice fantasies. you don't know anything about wwii. the main thing that the soviets did was sent hordes of worthless infantry formations to die against what was mostly german trash. as previously posted:    > >so the whole argument of comparing numbers becomes ridiculous. the vast japanese army in china was not held by massive chinese efforts, it was just an immobile mass in its own right. the vast hordes of infantry of either side wandering around the russian plains, were in fact little more than second rate garrisons waiting to be swept away by whichever side next concentrated a high tech strikeforce. the real count of what was going on, was where the elite were being engaged. > >so the whole argument of comparing numbers becomes ridiculous. the vast japanese army in china was not held by massive chinese efforts, it was just an immobile mass in its own right. the vast hordes of infantry of either side wandering around the russian plains, were in fact little more than second rate garrisons waiting to be swept away by whichever side next concentrated a high tech strikeforce. the real count of what was going on, was where the elite were being engaged. > >so the whole argument of comparing numbers becomes ridiculous. the vast japanese army in china was not held by massive chinese efforts, it was just an immobile mass in its own right. the vast hordes of infantry of either side wandering around the russian plains, were in fact little more than second rate garrisons waiting to be swept away by whichever side next concentrated a high tech strikeforce. the real count of what was going on, was where the elite were being engaged.
United Kingdom