trvth nuke  proposition 1: political entities share the same essence as biological entities in their will to self-propagate and survive through ever-varying ways and means. proposition 2: nature does not like hegemonies in all forms, and geopolitical history, as well as the history of ideas, follows an entropic pattern. proposition 3: policymaking throughout history has been diverse and will always remain so, as it is an imperative for the survival of the super-system that is human civilization. the west, particularly liberals like fukuyama and pinker, exhibit a certain naivety and arrogance in believing that we have reached the end of history and the best possible ideologies. this stems from a linear and deterministic view of history, where they see history and the history of ideas as converging toward a specific endpoint. i completely reject this way of thinking. instead, i see the world of ideas and ideologies (which are essentially forms of problem-solving) as an ecosystem. i reject the notion of declaring which is bettersocialism or capitalism, democracy vs. autocracy, etc. it makes no more sense than saying trees are better than dolphins. the diversity of ideologies and problem-solving methods is a necessary and inevitable aspect of human civilization.
Morocco