nobody cares if you call it a conspiracy theory, you plebbit nigger. thats not a naughty word here.  > why would they care about whether or not it's undeniable? there comes a point where even the do-nothing faggot republicans in the house/senate are forced to do something about the obvious cheating. theres a line between its obvious and its mathematically provable without reasonable doubt. > what "infrastructure" would be required to rig an election, by the way? feel free to look into the dozens of lawsuits the trumps team took on in swing states about this very topic. there are many laws (or intentional lack thereof) that would be considered infrastructure for election fraud. democrats will do whatever they can to cheat and it requires a judge literally threatening jail time for administration to not do shit like bring in new ballots for a week after the election. hell, half of the country doesnt even require voter id.  > precisely how many more "rigging apparatuses" are required to rig an election of 2020 to another of an arbitrary size? idk, how many states still allow vote harvesting through mail in voting? > what are the "statistical probabilities" you're talking about and how did you calculate them? see pic for an example. there are dozens of examples of things like this.
United States