> why do they still believe a threat like that could work? its absolutely insane, its identical to londons plan of 'embarrassing' putin so bad, he is couped, killed and russia balkanized: the uk strategy: arrogant, sociopathic narcissistic delusional escalation   odcd8waw8xc_s&t=91 > "we will provoke russia as much, as hard and as fast as possible, ceaselessly escalating because putin will never "do anything" about our impudent "red line crossing", and then, we will make fun of putin in the media, "embarrass him" and the russian regime will collapse because russians will see that putin is in fact weak and not strong, like his strong-man image pretends! > "russian military power is fake. russian 'power' is merely an illusion, russian power comes from 'perception', unlike the west who is so superior they simply just act 'weak' and 'disorganized' by choice in ukraine!" > "i have no idea why ukraine isnt using stormshadows this very second to strike moscows major cultural centers, as revenge and to teach putin a lesson in personal humility" "putin must be humiliated, to restore the rules based liberal order's legitimacy" *news reporter woman speaks* > "what if putin is serious?" *back to the retarded bong-/k/ike* > "lol who gives a shit? we british who won the cold war are masters at 'state-craft' and we will simply humiliate and embarrass putin further, using 'state-craft' and the russian regime will simply collapse all the faster!" thats it^ thats natos entire strategic mission at this point, and they literally end every news segment muttering it under their breath, when pressed for "the gameplan" in ukraine this plan^ along with:    are perhaps the two most idiotic and disastrous 'strategic paths' ever taken by a multi-national coalition to wage a war of aggression on russia
United States