that's consistent with their belief in universal humanism, so that's not really a critique they'd acknowledge as meaningful. most leftists would agree that your price of food is a worthy sacrifice for another's life. but we have entered a very strange application when the price of food is seen as an irrelevant concern to a small minority's personal sense of belonging it would be consistent if they argued that they aren't mutually exclusive ideas in their view (i'd argue otherwise). but most didn't even do that! people were told to just shut up and listen, that they are worth more intangibly than your stupid lives, etc.! predominantly the message from the left to the right, mostly related to getting their le dunks in, was > fuck your eggs > shut the fuck up > trans rights ^_^ no matter how much types like my pet would argue that wasn't his belief, no matter how much they might try to claim irony or being silly, *that was the message sent out from the broad left.* materialism? it was idealism through and through. stancil is accidentally correct by being extra wrong
United States