> i understand you have tds i'm talking to a bot aren't i, no one is this stupid. > the eo should have been xx or xy at conception which would have only invited the rhetoric over intersex genetic error examples my image mentioned. better to do without that, since "produces the small cell" implies both genetics and anatomy, and precludes all the rhetoric muddying the water on both genetics and anatomy. objectively, gender doesn't exist as a linguistic or cultural category; it's a constellation of concurrent objective realities in every biological human. you're not presenting any argument to refute that biological reality, it's immutable.   > how so? only chromosomes matter as explained above, chromosome are concurrent with a constellation of simultaneous biologically sexed features" everyone thinks you are a freak when you look at the mirror you can see your broad shoulders you can see the 5 o'clock shadow you can see your curveless body people may entertain your delusions but behind your back they laugh at you > muh aig even your boxer tranny you came here shilling for last summer was born with male genitalia. try making an argument for why one way of stating biological reality is less legally practical because that's all you have to hack at in this case. obvious fucking cognitive infiltration team shills.
United States