> you have a view that even most atheist scholars with disagree with. those "atheist scholars" use the talking snakes text as a historical source of the same level as contemporary newspapers lmao. we literally still do not have secular history discipline, only religious history skinwalking as one. history today is still in the same state as geology was back when it was considered by literally everyone that the world in 7000 years old because it is written in the scripture. > you're probably a radical homosexual/sodomite. what's with abrahamics and hyperfocus on gay sex?
Russian Federation