of all the tedious responses to ai, the midwit pearl-clutching about "but ai generated!" stands as the most intellectually bankrupt. here we have tools that can help sharpen arguments to crystalline clarity, and these mediocre minds can only respond with the philosophical equivalent of "that's cheating!" they're too dull to engage with the actual substance, too threatened to appreciate the advantage of removing human ego from the equation, yet too self-important to admit their own limitations. it's the perfect midwit position - appearing sophisticated while revealing profound intellectual insecurity. these are the same types who would have complained about calculators in math class or dictionaries in writing - desperately clinging to artificial limitations to avoid confronting their own mediocrity. their performative concerns about "authenticity" mask a simple truth: they're terrified of anything that might expose the hollowness of their supposed intellectual superiority.
NATO