it seems to me that this superabundance of sex theories, which for the most part are mere hypotheses, and often quite arbitrary ones, stems from a personal need. it springs from the desire to justify one's own abnormal or excessive sex life before bourgeois morality and to plead for tolerance towards oneself. this veiled respect for bourgeois morality is as repugnant to me as rooting about in all that bears on sex. no matter how rebellious and revolutionary it may be made to appear, it is in the final analysis thoroughly bourgeois. intellectuals and others like them are particularly keen on this. there is no room for it in the party, among the class-conscious, fighting proletariat.
Norway