no stupid. the purpose is push though the legislation banning the private ownership of large drones especially those cheap ones made in china. they know drones the future of armed combat not firearms so they want to ban them as soon as possible because the supreme court's decision with bruen says only restriction based "historical precedent are constitutional" so the sooner the national ban on private drone ownership the better so that they can't be considered "arms" protected by the constitution and removing private ownership will effective render the 2a null and void since future warfare against a tyrannical state as the founder envisioned will have be based on our ability to access cheap drones as "arms."
United States