> transcendental argument intellectual weaksauce, as logic tends to be redundant and self-affirming when arguing mere existance, which also isn't needed because pagans believe in god(s). > god is not really a jew meh, again that's arguing in bad faith as you still hug a bible.  if you were correct, you all would have reduced jesus' teachings to a mere handout. judeo-christianity comes with huge cultural attachments, which is the point you seem to miss. and empirically i'm clearly right, christians cannot help themselves but larp as jews and take all those cultural artifacts very, very seriously. as a pagan, i'd say that is to be expected, as we can't transcend this material body. from there it follows that the material prescriptions cannot be handwaved, they are as necessary and serious as metaphysical teachings. after all, we're here for a reason. because of that, we also reject the radical christian onthology and supposed omnipotence, which is another jewish monstrosity. > the triune god is the philosophical solution to the 'problem of the one and the many' maybe, but here we proabbly agree more than disagree. you got the tripartite godhead from pagans (i forgot which patriarch introduce it centuries after jesus), just like most concepts you borrowed and which often make no sense and have no tradition, e.g. the soul. > how do you and i even exist after two thousand years? christianity is far younger. it took of with the elites about 1000 years ago and peaked after the renaissance, when the elites began to leave and the masses first really partook. chaos followed and thanks to nonwhite weakness, we survived. today christianity is a dead man walking. it has no chance of survival because of demographics. this is is the ultimate truth. 100 ago christianity was 90% white. soon it'll be the opposite and whether you like it or not, whether i'm exaggerating or not, a brown christianity, which is the future, will be very different and decidely anti white
Germany