> did archive.org/wayback machine miss that?  not sure, we do know for a fact however that they have been compromised, but you should always use them in conjunction > if you were going to archive, why not screenshot as well? thats what that pic is. only issue i have with screenshotting, is if it comes down to proving it in court or something, an archive link is mathematically provable. i.e. jews can just say > thats a photoshop screenshot which hare all over /pol/ in case you hadn't noticed. being able to sign and timestamp the website as it was, is crucial in proving proofs, even internally when anons get confused with too many shooped screencaps. if you have been here for so lng, you would know that. pic unrelated
Australia