fuck you beaner. the economic impact of spending $1 on domestically produced goods versus imported goods can be understood through the concept of the multiplier effect. this effect measures how initial spending leads to additional economic activity. the magnitude of the multiplier depends on several factors, including the marginal propensity to consume (mpc), the marginal propensity to save (mps), and the marginal propensity to import (mpm). multiplier effect for domestically produced goods: when you spend $1 on a domestically produced product, the money circulates within the local economy, leading to further spending and income generation. the formula for the simple spending multiplier is: multiplier = 1 1  mpc multiplier=  1mpc 1  for example, if the mpc is 0.8 (meaning consumers spend 80% of any additional income), the multiplier would be: 1 1  0.8 = 5 10.8 1  =5 this implies that the initial $1 spent could generate up to $5 in total economic activity. impact of imports on the multiplier: when spending is directed toward imported goods, a portion of the money exits the domestic economy, reducing the multiplier effect. the adjusted multiplier, considering the mpm, is: multiplier = 1 mps + mpm multiplier=  mps+mpm 1  for instance, if the mps is 0.1 and the mpm is 0.3, the multiplier becomes: 1 0.1 + 0.3 = 2.5 0.1+0.3 1  =2.5 in this scenario, the initial $1 spent on imports would generate only $2.50 in total economic activity, compared to $5 when spent on domestic goods. conclusion: spending on domestically produced goods typically results in a higher multiplier effect, leading to greater economic activity within the local economy. in contrast, spending on imported goods results in a lower multiplier effect, as a portion of the expenditure leaves the domestic economy. therefore, from a macroeconomic perspective, purchasing domestic products can have a more substantial positive impact on national economic growth.
Thailand