> human remains were first found in lagoa santa in 1844, when danish naturalist peter wilhelm lund (1801-1880) discovered some 30 skeletons deep in a flooded cave. almost all these fossils are now at the natural history museum of denmark in copenhagen. a single skull has stayed in brazil. it was donated by lund to the brazilian history and geography institute in rio de janeiro > among the 15 ancient skeletons from which genetic material was taken, five belong to the lund collection in copenhagen. they date from between 10,400 and 9,800 years ago. they are the oldest in the sample, alongside an individual from nevada estimated to be 10,700 years old > among the 15 individuals whose dna was analyzed, three of the lagoa santa five were found to have some genetic material from australasia, as suggested by the theory proposed by neves for the occupation of south america. the researchers are unable to explain the origin of this australasian dna or how it ended up in only a few of the lagoa santa people > the fact that the genomic signature of australasia has been present for 10,400 years in brazil but is absent in all the genomes tested to date, which are as old or older, and found farther north, is a challenge considering its presence in lagoa santa, they said i really wish the negrito colonization hypothesis was right because the label "indians" that the europeans gave to the native americans would make sense since the indians are descended from the aasi mixed with iran_n from bmac who founded the ivc/harappan civilization and were called dasyu/asuras by the aryans/vedics despite the iranians also being indo-aryans and this cause the deva-asura split after the battle of the ten kings, with zoroastrianism demonizing the daevas, their old priests, the angras (who comes from the angirasas, sons of the wise angiras/god of fire agni, who was the author of the atharvaveda, the veda of magical formulas, which is why the zoroastrian priest were called magi).
Brazil