there's a bunch of other shit to consider with the bias of the researchers and what their agendas might be in this 'study' but the biggest thing is, only of knows what the demographics of their site really are for who consumes or makes what, and as even the 'study' points out: > while onlyfans, to date, has not released data detailing the exact nature of the sem services provided on the platform, descriptions of creators accounts are available across the internet, including in discussion platforms (i.e., reddit) that are moderated by and for sex workers and other sem content creators. > while onlyfans, to date, has not released data detailing the exact nature of the sem services provided on the platform.... this is a 'scientific' hatchet job, and all data can be skewed, tweaked, and even out-right thrown out, to serve an agenda while masquerading as "studying a cultural phenomena", as far as i am concerned.   > fairly well received in the scientific community well see, that's kind of the problem here. most studies are non-replicable shams to essentially make "paper a, professing statement b is true, to further agenda c" type of shit, that was already a foreknown conclusion in the researchers minds because they're really getting grants and paid to now make things 'scientific fact' that their universities and sponsors would really have like to have heard in the first place and that will reinforce their biases. and most 'researchers' have ingrained bias to an almost dogmatic level, from being part of the 'scientific community' and existing in and taking on mindsets from being constantly exposed to the extremely left-biased cultural setting that is modern academia.
United States