> what to you would be sufficient evidence of the existence of sars-cov-2 ? 1. take a sample (bodily fluid) from an allegedly infected person 2. isolate the alleged virus from the fluid 3. inoculate a group of healthy people with the isolated virus 4. observe people experiencing the expected symptoms 5. isolate the alleged virus again from the newly infected people that's how you prove it how they do it: 1. take a sample (bodily fluid) from an allegedly infected person 2. inoculate a monkey kidney cell culture with this mixture, assuming it contains the virus 3. poison the culture with toxic antibiotics and a bunch of other shit like bovine serum and trypsin 4. cell culture dies and breaks down 5. do a pcr test  6. call this the "isolation of the virus" virus is never observed, never isolated, never making another person sick, never any of that now kill yourself, you pathetic little shit and go annoy someone else to spoonfeed you this shit, worthless fucking mouth breather
Slovenia