> the intention behind fighting wars is a good outcome. i have never claimed the opposite nor have i said anything about fighting wars at all. are you seeing ghosts? none of this is relevant to your initial claim or anything i said in response to it.  > your example is an obvious strawman as it tries to paint all rule breaking as simply for evil aims. nothing of the sorts is true. it's really simple. you said universal rules are for idiots and that you need to adapt. i gave you a counter example. now you're throwing a fit. > blindly following rules can easily lead to fatal outcomes. again, you're strawmanning as i've never claimed the opposite. i merely claim that there are universal rules that you should always follow and i gave you a concrete example that you're yet to address. which fatal outcome could come from the following the rule not to engage in pedophilia?
Germany