so would we expect to find an increase in strokes, pulmonary embolism, heart attacks etc? has there been a large unusual increase in those? >  -news/articles/2024-01-17/new-cance r-cases-projected-to-hit-record-hig h-in-2024 this is just an article talking about the general increase in cancer. cancer is increasing all the time as people live longer, they eat more processed food, the generations raised on processed food age into cancer age groups etc. if the jab caused a significant increase in likelihood of developing cancer then we would expect to see a significant increase in cancer, would we not? so we would want to look at the rate of cancer diagnoses amongst a population - not number of people with cancer as you can have a large surge in cancer due to something like lockdowns of delaying diagnosis and treatment and so you end up with a spike because normally those who would be treated more quickly instead require longer treatment and so on. and we would want to adjust it for age and obesity and population increase etc, as the population is becoming more aged as boomers move into their 70s and there's relatively less children and people live longer, and people are becoming more obese and so on, which is the general trend of increasing cancer. if the jabs have a likelihood of even 1 in 1,000 causing cancer within 3 year period (which must be far less than eating a lot of junk food and smoking and drinking a lot), then we would expect a large increase in cancer. u.s.a., for example, has like 250 million people under 50, so it would be about 250,000 more cancer cases.
United Kingdom