> what about weapons ukraine is begging for, for literal years? > they got other weapons, also nobody would sacrifice for ukraine, us was never going to take any real risks, like giving them modern weapons or long range missiles ukrainians actually control see, you can make sense, just needed a bit of bullying you make you talk yes, ukraine committed to the war under the assumption the us is committed to their victory, but us was only committed to a longer war they can chose an ending for, and no more, for many reasons, among them the fact that nooks are real enough for the us to fear them this is pretty much the commonly accepted narrative in polish 'geostrategy' circles today, and also, pretty much what ruzzians were predicting for ukraine what do you think is the lesson from this conflict? in polish 'geostrategy' circles, the most important one is: going to war with us backing, but no ability to control escalation, is a recipe for a national catastrophe
Poland