> one very significant point about these figures is that if we remove the 11 900 afvs received by the soviets via lend lease, and allocate all german wwii fully tracked afv production to the wehrmachts east front forces (i.e. add those lost fighting the western allies), then the germans would have only needed kill loss ratio of 2.45 to 1 in order to have destroyed all soviet fully tracked afvs that existed on 22nd june 1941 (23 300 afvs) and all 99 150 fully tracked afvs produced during the war (122 450 afvs). this figure is well below the 2.94 to 1 kill-loss ratio historically achieved. these figures demolish another more recently fashionable myth relating to the east front; specifically that the soviets (largely due to the huge number of t-34s produced) could have won wwii without any input from the us or commonwealth forces. this is before we even consider the effects of increased german production (of all weapon types) due to the absence of allied strategic bombing, the direct effects of german air superiority on the east front from 1943 onwards, the effects of the red army loosing over half its motorised transport, and the effects of 9-10 000 additional (and fully supplied) heavy 88mm flak guns on the east front from 1941 onwards.   i know you for what you are, which is a screw up terminally online social media-addicted loser who copes with what a little pathetic fuck up he is by being a contrarianist online.
United Kingdom