red-pill time: the roman empire was located in anatolia!  all pre-modern history was made up by the vatican to retrofit the bible. the piece that puts everything together is realizing that julius caesar was a title (caesar is etymologically similar to the indo-aryan word for 'king' and julius (iulius) is similar to both (i)jupiter and to the indo-aryan word for 'sun') and his real identity was actually asander, philocaesar philoromaios, king of bosphorus (the city of byzantine, later called constantinople, and now istanbul was/is located in the area called bosphorus), and his wife dynamis ourania (translates to 'heavenly power'), queen of bosporus, was cleopatra's regional alias. dynamis was the granddaughter of mithridates vi eupator who carried the title 'king of kings' and she was the niece of mithridates 'chrestus', prince and co-ruler of the kingdom of pontus. asander and julius caesar were born in the same year, so was dynamis and cleopatra, also, asander's son, tiberius julius aspurgus philoromaios, was born about the same time as caesarion and emperor tiberius julius caesar. this aristocratic family was galatian. the galatians were celtic and therefore druids who worshiped esus. 'the son of the man is a koine-> aramaic-> koine mistranslation of alexander. he even wore a crown of thorns. this is why europeans accepted the slave morality of christcuckery so easily. they thought that it was the same religion that they were already worshiping for centuries.  ralph ellis's king izates of monobazus theory is only partially correct. there were other iza's in anatolia. the aforementioned asander, isa amen (jesus amen) of rev. iii. 14 who was also amyntas of galatia who was also amyntas nikator, etc. what they all have in common is that they were relatives of asander or his wife dynamis and were based out of anatolia (modern turkey) or close to it (adiabene). read more:    ns-of-christianity/
European