> why do you say this so confidently?  because there is no logical reasoning to support one over the other. anyone could be right, from hindus to mormons, or none at all. > the assertion that all claims equally incredible is also plainly untrue.  theyre equally unreliable and uncredible. you have no real evidence otherwise besides your own bias. > you say you have a problem with men speaking on god's behalf yet you apparently seem to know what is and isn't a "god-made idea" and yet you choose to accept ancient mens ideas about god yet reject mine. thats all these books are. mans ideas about god. why am i any less credible than paul?
United States