not based at all. bigger government is bad. why do you actively want less rights?    > muh kids! it's the parent's job to police what their kids do. nobody else whatso ever has any duty at all to assist you, or your kids.   > something that parents can control 100% of the time no matter what. litterally does not matter at all, remotely, whatsoever; as its nobody else's problem. additionally, your "reasoning" is the same that leftists (subhuman vermin) use to excuse the evils to commit. > but you have to do something to prevent 11 year olds from looking at this stuff. yes, your parents have to do something, if they wish to prevent it. > oh my god! why didn't the clerk check his id?! go shut this place down!!! there should be no id for those things either, yes.   > shouldn't check anyone's id when they try to buy alcohol or get into an adult club either correct. just as we should not have laws mandating seatbelts. > that's their parents's responsibility correct. you have highlighted another long standing area of government overreach. imagine thinking you've got an argument. you're leftwing.      > porn isn't for kids. subjective and irrelevent. if some deranged parents want to get their kids watching porn and become a toddler tranny, it's their kid they're destroying. not anyone else's problem. unfortunate and perhaps harsh, but it solves itself through natural selection.   you're simply too unintelligent to understand. many are, as are leftists.   yep, and many in this tread are clapping seals for it. sad!   fed.
United Kingdom