> muh presuppositions if we assume christianity's paradigm, there is nothing coherent about it. you believe in a 6000-8000 year old earth and that man was poofed from mud by god. you also believe in moses's snake duels and talking snakes / donkeys. you believe in dragons, the solar system arbitrarily stopping, and a god in the sky who pours fire into the earth when you upset him too much. you believe in a global flood with kangaroos who were transported from australia to syria and back again. there is literally no proof or trace of any of this in lived, experiential reality, which christianity assumes when it assumes logic, evidence, and reason. if we lived in a world where this was true, we would be able to document these things to some extent, and we can't because they don't exist. so i don't have to give you my paradigm. neoplatonic interpretations of mythology and atheism are far more coherent than a nicene orthodox christian paradigm.
United States