> nothing itself cannot actually exist neither can something. fundamentally, there exists only a probability of something either existing or is not. when it is measured, the probability is evaluated, and information is produced. until a given state is measured or observed, it exists in all states possible, however the term "exists" in this case is rather abstract, in the same sense that a cat which as not been observed yet "exists" as both dead and alive (though is is incorrect as the cat actually exists as all possible configuration of it's constituents in all possible energy levels)  this also proves time is discreet, as something cannot be "measured or observed" until a deterministic point in time and if time was continuous, it could not "exist" in a state until it is measured, as it would technically be measured continually, meaning that it would actually "exist" (return information) as all possible states when measured, and since only one particle can physically occupy an instance in spacetime, time cannot be continuous else all particles would exist in all possibilities in a localized point of existence - described as the "big bang" time being continuous also violates causality, as causality cannot exist until a discreet point in time is measured, and if time was continuous, causality would generate a singularity as all possibilities would be forced to exist with their subsequent interactions subject to causality. hands down, without out a doubt, cut and dry, we're in a simulation. redshift is a thing because it's like trying to progress toward the horizon in a video game, no matter how much time you spend walking, you never actually get any "closer" to it. this is done to simulate as little as possible, exactly like a real video game. to me, it is clear as day and anyone calming otherwise is either insufficiently educated, woefully ignorant, or unwilling to confront truth
Canada