it's not a paradox, it's one of the simplest laws of human behavior there exists. popper just used his talmudic pilpul skills to make it look like something deeper than it is. every society tolerates something and doesn't tolerate something. nazi germany did not tolerate abuse of animals etc. most of the thing tolerated by nazi germany were things tolerated also by the shitlibs.  every political and/or ideological system, a memeplex one could say, tolerates stuff which is beneficial for it and doesn't tolerate stuff which undermines it and destroys it. this is pure darwinism, nothing more. popper just makes you believe that "all tolerance" = "tolerance as shitlibs like to define it". he makes a wordplay, like an illusionist. most of people never think about it, and many of them are left thinking that to be tolerant, you have to eradicate what karl popper and his ilk dislikes.
Finland