> peer-review is a circle jerk > most studies do not result in reproducible results >  nvironment-39054778 then those are bad studies. simple as that. if you look at so called "social science" most of it is total junk that can't be replicated. that's fine. contrast that with something like the original higgs boson study. tens of thousands of scientists have provided peer review and the paper still stands. indeed, that original paper laid the groundwork for the eventual discovery of the higgs.
Republican