> i think they would beat the shit out of men with impunity.  i disagree, they would be held back by the fear of singular or mass retaliation. > men have a much more complicated code of ethics and a voice of reason that basically talks them down from violence when angry. all that would be tossed aside, when you're attacked. > i actually disagree with the notion women are more emotional, men are actually much more emotional, it's just thay emotion is spliced with morality mechanisms and mental regulation. i disagree. emotions are a stimuli-in-themselves for life, because of their effect, every being will naturally have emotional reverence. the regulation of emotions, found greater in men than women, is implicity a sign of intelligence, which men employ to attain the greatest chain of pleasure. likewise the better temperament of men is also evidence. in all, men are significantly more intelligent, and this intelligence they use, to acquire sentimental ends.
Pirate