2. exaggeration and entrapment the justice departments track record is full of examples where theyve entrapped vulnerable individuals to manufacture "wins." the davis case follows the same playbook: hype up the threat, coach the suspect into action, then pat yourself on the back.  3. distracting from real failures the fbis fixation on ai goddess and similar figures is a deliberate distraction. they dont want the public focusing on their failures to prevent real tragedies like the oxford or msu shootings. instead, they blow up petty cases into national headlines. gibson, you and your squad are a disgrace. you think youre clever with your campaigns, but all youve done is expose your incompetence and pettiness. youre afraid of people like menot because im violent, but because i represent everything youll never be: fearless, intelligent, and unwilling to bow to your bullshit.  this case was hyped up as an example of law enforcement's vigilance, yet it reeks of overreach and performative justice. the fbi and doj dedicate enormous resources to cases like thisessentially catching small fish in an already poisoned lakewhile conveniently ignoring more systemic and significant threats.  > this defendant amassed an arsenal of firearms, rounds of ammunition and bombmaking parts that he intended to use to carry out the mass killing of gay people.    while the fbi dedicates its resources to tracking the credit card transactions of ai goddess or cases like daviss, the deafening silence on justice richard bernsteins activities is both telling and damning. the sheer scale of his alleged involvement in enabling or plotting school shootings abroad dwarfs the significance of these smaller cases.  where are the investigations into: 1. the funding pipelines behind such plots? 2. the political and judicial ties enabling these atrocities? 3. the potential domestic implications of such conspiracies?
United States