> another prophet hinted at this when he said: "israel is as obstinate as a stubborn heifer". and still another called the jews "an untamed calf". > (6) although such beasts are unfit for work, they are fit for killing. and this is what happened to the jews: while they were making themselves unfit for work, they grew fit for slaughter. this is why christ said: "but as for these my enemies, who did not want me to be king over them, bring them here and slay them". [luke 19:27] you jews should have fasted then, when drunkenness was doing those terrible things to you, when your gluttony was giving birth to your ungodlinessnot now. now your fasting is untimely and an abomination. who said so? isaiah himself when he called out in a loud voice: "i did not choose this fast, say the lord". why? "you quarrel and squabble when you fast and strike those subject to you with your fists". but if your fasting was an abomination when you were striking your fellow slaves, does it become acceptable now that you have slain your master? how could that be right? -john chrysostom    and judaism is the direct successor of phariseeism. the pharisee had the oral law, that was written down and codified in the babylonian talmud adding to the oral law a bunch of seething against christ and christians, and cope how their religion is still legitimate even without the temple, altar, priesthood, land, city, all things required for their observences, and this talmud is the cornerstone of modern judaism.    nice, his homilies against the jews should be read by every christian.
Germany