> that's objectively treason. technically not, because treason is defined so narrowly by the constitution that it's literally impossible for anybody to commit treason no matter what they do unless america is actually in a legally declared war. america has not been in such a war since ww2, and accordingly, not a single american has been convicted of treason for anything done after ww2. > what about the rosenkikes who sold nuke secrets to the soviets? they were executed for espionage, not treason. america was not at war with the soviets, so it was not legally possible for them to commit treason.
United States