> your reply has nothing to do with what i said. i'd argue nick does have power because he has influence. enough influence to have his name tied directly to trump. enough influence to become a primary talking point for the democrats against trump. and enough influence to be used as a political weapon to divide trump from his own voters. i'm tired of his shit. if he wants to keep talking about the kikes that's fine. i actually think that's an area where he excels. but tell that queer little fucker to stay the hell out of politics because he doesn't know shit. the political philosophy of "christian nationalism" he promotes is anti-american in and of itself because it stands in direct opposition to the principles expressed by the founders who wrote our constitution.
United States