i don't think people will be voting for who they "support" necessarily, so if selzer took a more "emotional" angle to their polling, i think it probably skewed the results in favor of harris (ala saving democracy and not being mean and so on). however i don't think people's vote will be matching that sort of emotional preference, sorta like in 2016. the dinner table issues stain harris's campaign, and even if she's "preferable", people believe trump would make the economy better and secure the border. they're not actually voting for trump, they're just voting against what they see is a failed track record of good intentions and nice feelings but failed policies. holding their noses.
Kekistani