> what 'no shit'? google what "no shit" means, esl. > except they don't. because the vast majority of investors in said index funds throw very little on it. the big fish are the ones winning big because they have the most money to invest. so for every random goy shmuck that invests 1000 and gets 2000 out of it a couple of years down the line, there's a jew out there that wins millions out of the same thing. in a sense, it's rigged and only the very biggest ones win from the stock market. this is complete and utter drivel and demonstrates a completely ignorance of how investing works. the more you invest in a fund the more you get back in absolute terms obviously, but the return on in investment is the same.  > blackrock management absolutely does use its financial leverage on companies and tells them what to do.  they influence companies through their investment criteria for managed funds, not through active management decisions. for passive funds (the majority of the market) this isn't an issue, since there's no decisions being made on which companies to invest in. you are peak dunning-kruger.
United Kingdom