magna carta. niggers know nothing of it. kids no longer taught about it.  explicitly, it was a set of limitations on the powers of the monarch.... but the monarch was the head of state. so it was just accepted that the principals of the magna carta apply to any head of state. and as the monarchy became redundant in the uk the principals were applied directly to the pms office. there are some things the pm isn't allowed to do.  so when australia federated, it was the same monarchy, so it was just assumed the magna carta would still bear on the queen. but what wasn't considered was that as the british monarchy became redundant, the magna carta wouldn't bear on the australian pm. this isn't cooker shit, i'm not just waving some old document around because i don't like the current laws. the principals of the magna carta have strong merit, and i think most people would recognise that.... if they had any idea. which they don't.  and as a result australia has a serious juresdiction problem with the powers of "the crown" as distinct from the pms office.
Australia