joe is blinking twice as a warning. i appreciate it.  in the history of the us it's imperative to define an enemy if you are going after them and expect support. just look at any operation it has done at any time. one of the issues with the me war on terror was there was no flag to fight against no defined ops to pinpoint, all outlined in any reports you care to research so it was taliban or whatever moniker they tried to assign because they honestly couldn't and it really caused a lot of issues.  recently a fascinating article came out about war and bombing campaigns, highlight gaza but many other campaigns thru history, that people just want the bombing to stop so they drop the ideology they once vigorously supported because of shock and awe. it's called effective. take the crazy woman screaming in that baby's face. she had a defined enemy and did something not even the most hardend military in hostile zones would do- scream into a baby's face because that baby is 'part' of the enemy contingent. you witnessed something never before seen. and still, she hasn't faced any repercussions. because it's acceptable. you are garbage not human beings due to ideology so she gets a pass.  look no further than any comment section anywhere. the propaganda piece cnn did on fema and the can't be confirmed disclaimer for the lie about militia when sheriff says nope one guy. the comments were of a hatred so entrenched against a perceived ideology they were saying these people don't deserve help at all, let them suffer, this is what you get, tell the red hat maga help isn't for them- small paraphrase- but go see yourself.  an affront to their preferred ideology is anyone even just moderate and centrists that aren't on board with complete acceptance of their thinking.  so, thanks joe. i for one appreciate you trying to get the message out on what is happening internally. guess we have to wait until tuesday to know how far they are going to take this or if they are not taking power.
United States