that is also what dawla said even before bashart fled. they saw it as an inorganic revolution led by international powers. is argues that the recent escalation by the sahwat or awakening, as it has always called the syrian opposition, playing off the name of the anti-is sunni insurgents in iraq who sided with the americans during the surge, cannot be understood in isolation from its temporal context after the lebanon agreement [i.e., israel-hizballah ceasefire] and the international desire it generated to remove iran from the syrian scene, as well as the faltering political dialogue between asad and ataturghan, meaning erdogan. this is a jahiliya revolution, is declares, which wants a civil state of the kind they fought is for in the past, not a jihad for the sake of god. the goal of the insurgents is to replace an oppressive regime [lit. system, nizam] that monopolises power with a democratic regime that shares power. such are the concepts that would animate a free syria! after the end of asads syria! it consists of toppling an ugly statue and building another with a pretty face on its ruins! the proper islamic view is to condemn both sides of this national-nusayri fight, just as it was with the jewish-rafidi (israeli-iranian) conflict, is maintains. the overwhelming joy among the mass of ordinary muslims at the crumbling grip of the asad regime is natural and understandable, al-naba says, however, the displacement of the nusayris with the grip of secular turkey and its nationalist factions is not emancipation from the cocoon of jahiliya, but rather a transition to another era of jahiliya.
Jihadi