roe was a lot shakier as jurisprudence. it was pretty controversial even in legal circles. theres a reason even ginsburg thought the reasoning there was shaky, even if she agreed with its outcome birthright citizenship is on far firmer ground. there's the 14'th amendments citizenship clause, wong kim ark v. us(1896), 8 u.s.c. 1401(a) and over 100 years of immigration policy built on the assumption of virtually universal birthright citizenship. my analysis is that trump is going to get slapped down hard in the courts. expection a 7-2 decision against
United States