> practical homeland of poles what the germans actually took wasnt the homeland of poles though. they had to occupy the entire country because the uk wouldnt allow a peace conference to occur so the polish government in exile couldnt return and negotiate with germany. > belligerent warmonger he negotiated with a warlord state for a decade before finally invading after they began acting violently against his own people. > poles were the hostage what sort of a hostage invades their neighbors? > slav lands nope. romanians arent slavs. uralics arent slavs balts arent slavs germans arent slavs. > expense of poles no, at the expense of russians germany gave poles a formal state. > not germans germans took it by conquest in the middle ages, furthermore, germany is the only successor to the medieval polish state. by all metrics it is german land. > legalism if its not about legalism then its about conquest. poland lost to the germans, so they dont deserve the land. it would be different if britain was settling poland but they werent. poland lost, they shouldnt get rewarded for losing. > its their homeland the goths were there first.
United States