i'm not going to look up the specific clauses for specific proof to a literal who on 4chan who learned what hors de combat is five minutes ago. let me revise my position again since it was probably not clear to you idf see the guy in the video, they identify him as a militant. even if he doesnt carry any weapon or does anything combatant-like, if he is affiliated with hamas they can strike him on the spot and then strike him again. otherwise asymmetrical warfare would've been unfair for the professional army.  is that clear now?   > from what i have seen hamas is closer to international law than israel is then you're not a serious person > falling back to noooks because conventional strength is not enough? we'd have stronger conventional strength if we didnt have nukes tho. again you have a very childish outlook on life.
Israel