lmao as if i'd ever be so vain. believe what you want.   "observable, empirical and recorded truth"? pretty big words there. there's no scientific proof of female inferiority in science fields. you can always enlighten me with some quality studies though. any emphasis in neurophysiology and biochemistry is important, as it's the basis of explaining the validity of your statement. you are right about harvards founders. whether someone believes in god or not is irrelevant when we are trying to explain the observable reality. faith is something personal, and i can respect every person's beliefs about god. but you can't directly prove his existence, or his meddling in human affairs. no valid scientific methodology invokes the name of god. that's what i'm trying to say.
Greece