> also its not pilpul. you don't know what pilpul is.  > you presented your claim of being a lawyer as a refutation of my claim that flat earth enjoyers are disappointed with life. you weren't really making an argument, you were just trying to associate flat earth with unsuccessful people even though you're a government employee which is absolute proof you can't get a job in the real market.  > your supposed job title doesnt disprove that that's pilpul because you're intentionally misinterpreting my argument to steer the conversation to a place where you're more comfortable, i.e. whether i'm satisfied with my life, rather than discussing the tactics of government influence operations and how those tactics being used on this topic actually prove it.
United States