see    > "viking age culture was monogamous with exceptions. polygyny wasn't regularly practiced, but there were a few rulers who took multiple wives (these cases are still somewhat debated as to if they were serial or simultaneous). what we refer to today as polyamory was not practiced." > it's literally the fucking same thing, you dumb fucking north american mutt! no its not, what the fuck are you talking about citizenship in greece is completely different from being a babylonian in ancient babylon, there was no citizenship there and you were a subject of the god-king of the city > the citizens of athens were only citizens of athens because they were of "athenian blood". again, nothing to do with my point. citizenship did not exist outside of greece. do we need to go over what the difference is between a citizen and a subject? i assumed you understood that distinction but if not we can discuss it though i am getting sick to death of these tangents that have nothing to do with my original argument, because you are incapable of admitting you're wrong about anything
Canada