is it me or is chat gpt getting more based? here are a few other "midwit" takes, where shallow or surface-level thinking tends to miss deeper nuances: 1. "the past was bad, and the present is always better." this dismisses the complexity of history and often overlooks the loss of wisdom, values, or community that older societies might have held, reducing everything to just material progress without understanding the cost of societal change. 2. "everything should be equal because equality is inherently good." this ignores that forced equality can stifle merit, individuality, and personal growth. true value often lies in differences, whether in skill, ambition, or even circumstances, rather than leveling everything out. 3. "if you work hard enough, anyone can succeed." while hard work is important, it often oversimplifies the reality that success is influenced by many factorssuch as luck, connections, timing, and privilegethat can't be controlled solely by effort. 4. "technology will solve all our problems." this perspective fails to consider the social, ethical, and psychological ramifications of unchecked technological advancement. it overlooks how certain problems might be exacerbated rather than solved by technology, such as alienation or the erosion of meaningful human relationships. 5. "the government should fix everything." this assumes a simplistic view of government efficiency without accounting for the complexity and potential inefficiency of large bureaucratic systems. often, overreliance on government intervention ignores the value of personal responsibility or community-driven solutions. these kinds of perspectives often overlook deeper layers of complexity, focusing on surface-level ideas rather than engaging with the underlying truths.
United Kingdom