but all of this doesn't get at the core of the issue, and what ru propaganda tries to assert over and over again: the "kiev regime", implying that "ukrainians do not want this war". it's the crux they need, because otherwise - there would be legitimacy to ua, to its statehood as a sovereign nation. that's what they need to assert is not true, that's the narrative they need to make stick. and very, very obviously it is not true. every single barrel pointed towards subhuman mobiks shows this to be the case. despite all that desperate shilling about desertions and frontlines breaking because everyone secretly hates zelensky and he's a dictator and whatever: it's simply not true. we can see this; because if it was, ua would fold like syria. yet it doesn't. you can not deny the legitimacy of blood spilled.   > that was literally 1-2 days after kiev was totally overrun by the opposition overrun enough that the rest of the government still was able to function. and yanukovych never even gave notice to that government. he abandoned his duties and position. > but later found to have been fired from buildings controlled by the opposition. wrong. by the way, what is your opinion on mh-17, who did it?
Germany