no, you get back 47 cents on top of every 57 you put in if you choose trump. if you choose kamala, you get 57 cents for every 47 you put in. market forces should make kamala the more appealing bet if all things were equal. if the odds were really 50/50, then kamala would be the best bet. but she's not? so what this tells you is that investors are drawing on outside information, polls, insider knowledge, whatever. something is making them prefer the smaller payoff in exchange for a surer bet.
United States