> democracy being useful against a bad government america and every western govt, are examples of it being useless against horrendous govts > the establishment the who? who is this establishment? pelosi and chinless mitch? you keep saying the "establishment", do you even know who the "establishment" is? > still so much better than joe and the hoe you've just admitted to an "establishment" which apparently has desperately fought to keep trump from power, and were close to outright preventing an election to begin with. this same "establishment" literally kicked trump out of power 4 years ago and severely restricts the reforms he can pass... gee, it sounds like you have an oligarchy problem. worse, it sounds like you have a shogunate situation going on. if i didn't know better, i would say it sounds like there are oligarchical cliques fighting over access to the executive branch or something. well known historical problem. very dangerous. > yes but let's say he becomes bad oh come on. what could possibly be worse than deranged neoliberal, neo-communist lunatics trying to create another fucking utopia or deranged ultra nationalist zionists hell bent on bringing about the anti-christ to fulfill their dispensationalist eschatological agenda? > putting him in power couldn't be reversed by the people and would be permanent. bro...you've already essentially admitted that you are unable to reverse the power structure in the very system you are defending. that's my whole point! you can't, in the very system you are defending remove the current "establishment" from political power. should anyone try and rock the boat, they will be assassinated or forcibly removed from power. unless, of course, you adopt the monarchical position - which you refuse to do. can you not see the madness here?
Canada