you just don't understand america lad. the american identity has been renegotiated several times. first, to be an american, it was necessary that you were of british heritage, and it was highly preferred if you were protestant.  but this became problematic since so many germans and french fought in the revolution. so then you could be american if you were of an ethnicity close enough to british that an 18th century commoner couldn't visibly distinguish you, and you were also sufficiently americanized and your name was sufficiently anglicized. but then we needed to radically grow the population to settle the interior and west, so catholics from ireland and germany could be american too, as long as they spoke english and believed in the values. military service was highly preferred. but then we had the texas revolution that saw texas escape from mexico and later become a state. since so many mexicans participated in this, it didn't make sense to keep a blanket ban on citizenship for mexicans. and then we had reasons for including injuns, then blacks, then hawaiians and japanese, then italians. there were legitimate and understandable reasons for renegotiating the american identity because of historical events. but the british identity has never been up for negotiation because you haven't had the same history. the spics in america may be more numerous than wogs in britain, but they do not pose the same level of threat. spics may be dumb, brown mutts, but they carry white genes. niggers and pakis do not. also, you have way higher immigration per capita than us. yours is the highest in the world.
United States