> appealing to causal reasoning as the basis for a denial of god when you exist in an unexplainable temporal context where waveform function collapses upon looking at it meaning that reality locally doesnt become concrete until you observe it. > somehow this doesnt support timeline theory and that man still has choice despite existing in a deterministic context its not circular reasoning, if i gave you the answers to a test and you said you didnt learn anything, that doesnt mean that the answers are wrong just because you didnt show your work.  if the book is there, perhaps its meant for man to read, and if you go in expecting to find the atomic structure of hydrogen, youre feigning ignorance and implying its an excuse to reject something as simple as merely accepting what jesus did.   > appealing to a double edged sword that actually rips agnosticism out of your hands because its stipulated that just because you claim ignorance doesnt mean youre correct to do so.
United States