> airstrike them at will? it has now been shown that iran can do very little to respond to that. iran's entire strategy revolves around countering exactly that threat, what the hell are you talking about. it's false that iran's aa has failed, but let's suppose it were true, israel and the us can attack from the air, well, does that mean iran can't wipe out both of them? no, iran's focus on its ballistic missile arsenal is offensive and deterrent, in the event of an all-out war (very unlikely) iran will attack; all the oil refineries in the region, cut off the strait, destroy israel's infrastructure and all us military bases in the middle east. all this while its arsenal remains safe in underground city bases and while it rapidly accelerates its nuclear program to obtain the bomb. iran's deterrence is not based on having an impenetrable aa, but on its enormous offensive power, even if they suffer damage, they can strike back on a very destructive scale for the us.
Spain