> that egyptians, assyrians, romans and whatnot were ruled by aryans or that those civilizations didn't contributed at all to progress. you have it the wrong way around. they were an obstacle to progress. what they developed prevented progress. modern civilisation - actual civilisation, was achieved through destroying what they had created; all of their systems of civilisation were what prevented them from achieving anything as they enforce economic and social stagnancy, and what happened in europe is that those systems were introduced with the introduction of centralisation, but the latent culture rejected those systems. this isn't to say that there weren't all sorts of skilled craftsmen and so on, just like the amazing boat builders and metal workers in germania or scandinavia etc, but those were not a product of centralisation, that is latent. what pre-modern centralisation produced is vulgar shit like    of some little faggot bum boy who spent his life learning how to perfectly craft marble, at the behest of some pedophile and kiddy toucher who likes gaudy soulless shit such as that
United Kingdom