hes a pretty smart dude, my guy. while i dont agree with his ctmu, it's not like it's an absolute mess once you get the glossary down. my main issue is he steps away from logic at some point and starts declaring things not supported by his theory with the exact same conviction. this is especially bad in interviews where he doesnt really go into details about ctmu and just throws out the unsubstantiated conclusions he came to or trying to defend an axiom which is not provable.
United States