checked but wrong, there were hiring quotas rolled out on the eve of passing of the civil rights act, however they got stonewalled in the high court for being unabashedly being anti-merit and so rebranded it as affirmative action as "aid" which eventually evolved into dei "policy". > quotas were a wholly top-down approach through law that companies refused to adopt > affirmative action was a mix of top-down law and bottom-up policy disguised as a helping hand > dei through esg was mainly bottom-up policy enforcing adherence by weaponizing boycotts by major investment firms on smaller companies (literal oligarchy shit as anon here     posted) the concept is anti-equality no matter how they try to spin it and because people always see it that way, they forced it anyway. now you get what you deserve, which is violence because you made dialogue illegal by labeling it a hate crime.
United States