> some studies suggest so that first one is bullshit.  > no data, and 50 years old data at that so the second one is trash at best > loss of control on landing/takeoff was more common in crashes of female pilots. mishandling aircraft kinetics was the most common error of pilots of both genders and was noted more often in female pilots' crashes (81% vs. 48%) (p < 0.001). males' crashes were more likely to involve flawed decisions (29% vs. 19% of females' crashes) (p = 0.027) or inattention (32% vs. 19%) (p = 0.004). older pilots made fewer errors: among males age 55-63, 26% of crashes were without obvious pilot error compared with only 7% at age 40-49 (p = 0.003). there are large gender differences in the types of pilot error involved in general aviation crashes. mishandling aircraft kinetics, poor decision making, and inattention are the most common pilot errors and merit increased attention in pilot training. and the third one argues agaisnt your case kek.  you googled 'im right dot com' and this is the best you could come up with? you can't even see the flaws in your own logic, your accusations are hypocritical and its invisible to you. spatial/logic is dominated by men, its just the way pur brains work. physical strength/endurance is dominated by men, it's just the way our bodies work. women can do one thing that men can't, which is create life. your gender distribution may be a one trick pony, you should thank god its a good/essential trick. i feel as if i've argued with you before, but this logical blindness is common to most women. are you a women in the airforce btw?
United States