> the universe seems to have clearly defined fundamental "rules" those rules seem to change under certain condition (double slit, entanglement). so applying the rules you understand to existence is not necessarily reliable. > that at the minimum implies design if an ant looked up at a snowball, it might think a god created it. you see complexity and think something intelligent created it. that's wrong. > whomever is running the simulation is running it for a reason you are scared of the notion that there is no meaning to existence, which is why you are grasping for an explanation.
Japan