> one thing i'm curious about how were they not able to do it to korea, as the chaebols are basically exactly what the zaibatsu were korea went from explicit dictatorship to implicit and the same families kept power. korea also is militarized and not dependent on the us, korea also doesn't chimp out every single time they're allowed to have a standing army.  > nationalized good example of this is textile and automotive industries, which were nationalized during the war despite being majority german owned. this was partly because hitler greatly admired the us auto industry and wanted to replicate our success. post-war these companies became bmw, mercedes, adidas, and bundeswehr respectively.  > what you point out as "successful whites" in the rural areas are often shabbos goys you aren't american and can't speak on this then, your obsession with urbanism also makes me think you're some kind of communist or backwater european that doesn't understand concepts such as "lebensraum" or "manifest destiny" - the white impetus is to expand to the point the very land we habitate is wealthy and prosperous, cities were established as a means to that end and things went sideways around the time of wwii, urbanism was never the white endgame. every current and former superpower including and especially the nsdap understood this  white cities are also incomparable to asian cities since there's no other option for them(except the chinese but they're fucked for entirely different reasons kek) - it's not "abandoning the cities" it's exercising our god given mandate to expand, be fruitful, and prosper. moving to some bughive on the other side of the planet doesn't serve this end whatsoever.
Japan