that's ridiculous and makes sense due to one's inability to imagine the logistics in providing the right. food, water, medical treatment, lavatory, shelter, legal defense all of these things and more are "human rights" and require the labor of another human being. while they are almost all technically possible to achieve by yourself if you were to strike out in your own and go live in the woods, but that brings us to the fundamental problem of this argument: it requires the absence of society. if we were to all dissolve society and somehow had a guarantee that we would never have to pay taxes or be invaded by a foreign nation then this could work in theory. whether it would be better than having a society is debatable, but it could work. unfortunately, we don't have those guarantees and even before those were issues people had decided to band together because working together made it easier to ensure everyone received food, shelter, protection from wild animals, and access to a mate to ensure the continuation of our species. since we need to band together to protect ourselves from outside threats and continue to reproduce we are forced to live in a "society", and thus there are certain assurances that one must demand from society in order to make participating in it more desirable than living as a wild animal would. these are what are often referred to as "rights" that are guaranteed to at least the humans who this society is comprised of.
United States