> what do you think > >the united states should have nothing to do with it > means? he means the us should not directly fight either assad or the terrorists. not that we should leave the region. > but he should yeah, on january 20th, 2017. except he didn't and he has no plans to now. he's just going to support what the israelis and neocons he has running the administration which is to let syria fall into total anarchy, ironically, an even worse position than obama's, and why he criticized obama for not assassinated assad like he attempted to. > you've been arguing that he should instead stay and waste more money try reading the thread, retard. i've said since the start that he should have left in his first term, but because he didn't, he should stabilize the country and not let it fall to terrorists.
United States