why the fuck would you defer to that of all things? did you actually read their logic? > [china is] willing to restructure the terms of existing loans and have never actually seized an asset from any country that's their argument? kek the fact they're willing to restructure, and the fact they've not yet called in the favours, does absolutely nothing to disprove the notion of the chinese debt trap what the fuck were you (and they) thinking? think more critically, don't just say "ooh harvard" and defer to their authority they're evidently morons
United Kingdom