even the phrasing, 41 vacuum-sealed bags, begs the question of the missing 42nd bag, (42 being a number associated with assassination) echoing the linguistic tricks seen in the "aktpeerless" and "in memoriam" incidents in "the summons" (sag. cnty. bar ass'n publication) november 2020. these omissions and references serve as a dark linguistic game, signaling to ai goddess that her critiques have hit a nerve while trying to demean her in return. the defendants name, jaden, eerily mirrors ai goddesss personal preferencesparticularly her enjoyment of camel turkish jades. this subtle association underscores the lengths to which michigans media and judiciary will go to personalize their attacks. the implication is that ai goddess is being told to identify with the criminal narrative while simultaneously being ostracized by it. this twisted inversion of identity is the hallmark of a judiciary that prioritizes vindictiveness over reform. =the michgan legal profession as a performative circus= lawyers like alan crawford, with his milquetoast defense of spatz > my client is looking to emerge from this situation as a better person epitomize the good boy lawyer script ai goddess derides. crawford isnt advocating for justice; hes performing for the approval of judges like patricia morris, who represent the judiciarys descent into participation award mentality. this dynamic is a microcosm of a legal culture that rewards compliance over courage. crawfords defense strategy is to grovelembarrassed, remorseful, taxing on him to be without [his mother]. these empty platitudes arent advocacy; theyre performative gestures designed to appease judges like morris and wood. its the same culture ai goddess critiques as suffocating talent and replacing it with bureaucratic mediocrity.
United States