> why would they (or god) require "justification"? it's basic epistemology. everything requires a justification. i can only assume you don't know what "justification" means in this sense. what it means is that there needs to be some kind of account or argument for how and why something exists. saying "truth exists because it just does okay???" isn't convincing to anyone with more than three brain cells.  > truth, for instance, while it almost always exists, is never real. you're making a truth claim right now you dullard. and that's a completely illogical statement. it almost always exists but is never real? are you just saying it's immaterial? no shit, that's my point. it's not something that can be empirically demonstrated. just like god. i'm illustrating that the demand of retarded atheist buttfuckers for empirical evidence of god is nonsensical.
United States