> zionist violence that happened from the get go i'm not glossing over any historical facts. you're the one faking them. you see, here's the thing: the hebron massacre happened some 5 years prior to the formation of the first zionist paramilitary group. so the first murder, the first pogrom, the first grand act of violence was started by the arabs. surprise! > it was their homes for centuries misleading and irrelevant. misleading, since arabs migrated to that land just like the jews. in fact, jews brought there progress, which attracted even more non-jews to the area. as for the fact that some (but not all) of them lived there for centuries is a non-argument. mizrahi jews lived in arab lands for centuries too and yet, they were all kicked out by the arabs. in fact, israel have more arab citizens today than the no. of jews living in 21 arab countries. this little snippet of fact truly speaks for itself. > you're the ones that kicked them out certainly not me, but not the jews either. it wasn't a kicking out, it was a mass migration event instigated by the belligerent arab armies. at best, the israelis emptied 3 villages, only to make way and break the siege on jerusalem (y'know, the one intended to starve out all jews inside). > relatively speaking that's the understatement of the century. > compared to now well yeah, because those pesky jews didn't have back their sovereignty at the time. but they dared to take some 0.5% of the arab-muslim lands of the me, which is an affront to dar al islam ("once a muslim land, must always be a muslim land" religious doctrine). > they wanted a jewish state another ahistorical lie. you see, those jews were secular, socialist and leftist. they were nowhere near as nationalistic as they are today. cause and effect buddy. without constant arab wars and terror, israel would be a leftist state today still.
Gadsden