> funny how no one has managed to ever prove this can happen or has happened. > no one > ever meanwhile: > utah primary (2024): in tooele and washington counties, adjudicated ballots were not reflected in the total results when more than a few were entered at once. this was attributed to a technical issue, not a hack. > puerto rico primary (2024): over 1,000 errors were found, with voting machines incorrectly calculating vote totals. the elections commission attributed this to a technical issue. > northampton county, pa (2023): a coding error in voting machines caused votes to be flipped on a ballot question regarding the retention of state appeals judges. the issue affected over 300 machines, but was isolated to this specific question. > michigan (2017): a review of es&s and dominion voting systems found that they provided results to election officials in excel without hash values, making it possible for malware to change results before publication. > ohio (2007): a comprehensive review of ohios electronic voting technology found that all election systems relied heavily on third-party software, which could contain undisclosed vulnerabilities, such as trojan horses or malware.
United States