> but not solving them historically, for the most part. as you said: > communism does a good job at identifying problems which means their difficulty of solving problems itself eventually gets identified as a problem. > and then they fail to solve it soviet history 101. but after this, to some degree, i imagine people learned. nobody will repeat the soviet system exactly. even china went full market autism, with success however; they did not fail solving their problem, but they also kinda stopped being comunist, hmm? with advanced technology, like universal internet access and extreme computing power, maybe even ai too, communism may become more viable. but i am not expecting any communist revolutions any time soon. most people still have it pretty easy. bad times make commie men. > commie men create more bad times > which creates even more commie men > eventually critical mass is reached and they starve down to a normal amount of commies > this lack of commies generates good times
Germany