> seething double reply to the same post it's not "sexual assault" you sound like a woman circumcision provided minor benefit 3000 years ago in the desert when access to water was sporadically limited for droughts and such. myself and the bible say it is no longer necessary.  i don't care if we ban circumcision. be my guest and try to get it banned. the catholic church banned it at one point in fact.    > why would a "medical procedure" like that be done at that age? so he wouldn't put smegma dick in his wife and infect her he was still plowing his wives after circumcision.  an untreated bacterial infection can lead to infertility in women that is a huge part of the medical benefit: protecting fertile women.
United States