end of history and its subsequent lectures comprise some of the most retarded rousseau-ian fantasy slop i have ever read. at least "liberalism and its discontents" could accept that the ideas of liberation or subjectivism vs natural law were real still up for debate (although he never bothers addressing the managerial class critiques). end of history just assumes liberals won and they have nukes and money so liberals will reign forever and every other civilization on earth has to become liberal because ummm (he does not even try to justify his prediction that liberalism will sweep through the third world, its just wishful thinking). i partly think his own skin color is responsible for this attitude because more accurate predictions like those of oswald spengler specifically based its conflict around an insecure europe vs a rising third world that collectively sees itself as victims of these europeans. had he accepted the clash of civilizations or decline of the west model which both indicate that liberalism was insufficient, or even the machiavellian iron law of oligarchy which again was an exclusionary and uniquely white framework, he would have never said any of these retarded fantasies about secular democracy conquering human nature (nationalism, religious extremism, class warfare, degeneration of elites, etc). if you come in knowing anything about italian elite theory, or really any white anti-liberal ideology then you will have a hard time reading the slop fukuyama puts out.
United States