> so what you want is for me to control every fucking maga retard that is okay with playing the dems game?  what game? the game of 'fuck white people'. yeah, that's the game i don't want to lose, and it's a game you seem determined to keep playing. look how quickly you falter when i practially beg you to get angry at trump for all the same shit he does that kamala will do. i accuse you of not having the same energy when trump does the same thing and you odn't even deny it. it's fucking true. that's the problem. > because literally everything you are saying is 10x worse under harris.  based on what? they're both anti-white, they both lay siege upon whiteness, and when one does it, you man the walls, and with the other, you don't. do you see the problem here? > i get that you have this naive way of thinking that if we all said "women you go back to the kitchen" that it'll magically happen and order will be restored.  what the absolute fuck are you talking about? what the fuck? i'm not some retarded groyper. i'm a nazi you retard. i'm not some mysoginistic incel. > extreme shit like that doesnt bode well when there are a sizeable amount of retards in the population. what in the fuck.... i'm saying you wont put up any dialectic resistance when trump does the same anti-white shit. because you wont. you have tacitly admitted this. see this from the perspective of a city under siege. you man the walls when its one barbarian, but you refuse when it's the other barbarian. so if i could choose which barbarian, i'll pick the one you'll actually defend against. > you are not going back to the days where and those days are gone because of conservatives like you saying the same shit for 70 fucking years. the same pussies telling us to accept the new norm. at what point will conservatism be so utterly abhorrent that you'll finally realize it's the real enemy against white people? > for kamala to win?  yes, obviously. but that's over. trumps won.
Fascist