cheveron is the legal backing for the phrase "we're the experts" but governance has never been about expertise so much as adjudication of facts and harms. with cheveron deference, government could find fact and harm as well as adjudicate it.  under the new regime, the bias goes to the people disputing facts and claiming harm rather than the agencys. who before needed substantial harm 80/20% likelihood of damage, rather than the more conservative, as likely as not 50%. now the agency's must prove 20/80% substantially unlikely to have damaged. and 50/50 ties go towards the people. generally. gov't better make damn sure they're doing the right thing is the new standard. instead of the old fafofu
United States