the difference between religion and faith is that religion misattributes everything to itself and faith relies entirely on something god did or will do. having said that are you even fluent in being able to discern what the text says from what people do? the reasons why im asking is because you not believing is not an arguement, because your entire basis for your arguement is a presupposition grounded in disbelief, in which it has nothing to do with any fancy humanistic philosophy like rationalism or concepts of evidence, you just simply dont believe and im never shocked how athiests and jews larp as something theyre not and play a game as if theyre nobel prize winners or some shit of the sort. take the you, with how persistent you are with shilling that book for the last 2 years i wouldnt be suprised if im talking to a gpt. but even if im not, your unbelief is not a rational position to base a decision off of just because you dont believe the evidence is convincing enough. nothing can overpower someones will to believe something and yes, that applies to your opposition as well, its just the fact that if you know that, neither party is dealing with rationalism and youre not actually here to debate, this has nothing to do with conversion or anything of the sort. you simply hate god.
United States