compared to what? it's in a better situation than anyone. the u.k., and u.s., and denmark, and much of scandinavia and low countries isn't so bad, demonstrate a resilience that is not found anywhere else in the world. you'e not paying attention. i'm not syaing > it's not so bad i'm saying that at this rate it will only be anglos and scandis left after a few centuries of this. everyone else as soon as they start developing go into demographic freefall. the anglos, and to lesser extent scandis, have been exposed to this for now about 70 years, yet their populations are still stable. is the enormous difference here really so hard to process?
United Kingdom