the burden of proof in that case relies hard on evidence. naturally, if it's hearsay, then due process ideally would have it's day and whatever parties would see justice. but if there were irrefutable proof like > victim raped 29 years ago. > happened in "john rapesouls's" rape dungeon > "john rapesouls" keeps the rape dungeon in a certain way > rape victim recalls she was locked in a rape dungeon and recites every single detail there > she says there are locks of hair taped to the walls of each victim and whips on mountings  > police get a warrant and perform raid and alleged aggressor > rape victim's story is consistent with the evidence > perp gets the rope > rope is cheaper than lethal injection > don't need to waste precious bullets if it were a firing squad. > low emissions in that case, then a lack of statute is great. otherwise, if the only evidence is conjecture, then accusers don't have shit.
Australia