taking the connections of the through line backwards in time from the mid-1970s: > in 1976 george herbert walker bush (himself a decades-old cia agent while working as a texas oil executive for zapata petroleum since the '50s) was appointed by president gerald ford as cia director > coincidentally, gerald ford was a key member of the warren commission on the jfk assassination > donald rumsfeld is an under-recognized og charter member of the deep state. way back in july 1963----as u.s. house representative from illinois----he wrote a letter to doj office of the u.s. attorney general that it might be a bad idea for robert f. kennedy and his brother jfk to put the kabosh on the up-and-coming american zionist council (later aipac) by making them register as a foreign lobby. a few months later, dealey plaza happens... we can see these 3 *closely associated* top members of the executive branch, in privileged specifically designated (not at all random) and chosen positions, acting in loose parallel coordination toward similar or identical goals, over a period of decades. the cia expose by the 1975 church committee threatened to expose the agency's family jewels. if information at that time was to come out that agents of a foreign nation were somehow connected to or involved with the 22 november 1963 dealey plaza operation, it would have been of republic-ending magnitude but moreover would have impeded the decades-long term strategic empire restructuring for the state of israel. rumsfeld was knowledgable and on notice to give a reminder to rfk about possible consequences if the zionist lobby was not apprived as unrestricted. ford was acting on the warren commission 1964 to properly curate and steer the findings, conclusions. bush was sending notices to the fbi about his location that day 11/22/63 in dallas. each of these were subtle but clear implications of their awareness of the dealey plaza operation and its significance.
United States