> which he masks by pretending to be a champion of the little guy. but he's not how do you justify this? i'm curious as to your thought process. he had just cause, with both the intent and ability to carry it out. to say that he did it for himself alone for a "thrill" doesn't compute unless you're purposefully diminishing anybody who does anything as "fake". in your mind, what makes somebody "real" vs. "fake"?
United States