retarding the argument as usual no, this isn't commie rhetoric desu  non-coercive means no one can force you to pay money or serve  or in goodwill; > the idea that charity/good can be forced is coercive and should be banned  voluntary associations scare the shit out of the fed for this reason as they are diametrically opposed to the very foundation of centralized government.  english yeomenry left alone(parts of the early usa), the amish and the hre respectively have parts you can take inspiration from regarding this > why aren't you opposed to states? hierarchies are natural and mostly for good, what we should do is to check their power, reach and reliability to effectively counter those that aren't. there's also the note that; > states and companies are almost identical  one is a political organization while the other is an economic organization. thus the same rules that apply to the government should translate to companies, if not check the previous paragraph > abolish them no, let people reorganize and act purely on a legal basis on who owns what and protect said rights on who owns what from abuse desu.   also intellectual property rights is open to debate, i'm on "you have no rights on other people's thoughts" camp and want to abolish it for the most part. gayming, video and music are art not industries and forcing them to be so is a waste of time, talent and culture
Turkey