oh, you love it when "climate deniers" post graphs that reveal their supposed ignorance? how ironic, because that graph you posted, actually proves my point. you see those periods where co2 was significantly higher than today, yet the planet didn't become a fiery hellscape? that shows co2 isn't the primary driver of climate. you also seem to conveniently ignore that historical temperatures, like those in the 1930s, were comparable, if not higher, than what we see today. these weren't caused by anthropogenic co2, so why is this current period considered an unprecedented crisis? there have been multiple warm and cold periods, glacial and interglacial cycles. the earth spends far more time in colder glacial periods, and we're currently in an interglacial period, which is already extending beyond the typical length, and it started hot and cooled. so why are we worrying about the planet getting warmer? we should be more worried about it cooling! furthermore, this idea of a single 'average global temperature' is an absurd abstraction. it completely disregards the complex dynamics of the atmosphere, the oceans, and how different areas warm or cool. this isn't a simple system where a molecule of co2 acts like a universal thermostat. how can you claim to understand climate when you dismiss the oceans complex interactions? what about the sun, with its cycles, its intensity? what about the moon with its nodal cycles affecting oceans? it does not seem to fit your agenda... they are ignoring that throughout history, the planet has had warmer and colder periods before the industrial revolution and human emissions, and the modern science that shows how complex this is. if you disagree with their narrative, theyll throw insults like "fucking retard", which really speaks more about their lack of scientific arguments. you're pushing a political agenda. you are an insult to actual scientific inquiry and critical thinking.
Brazil