> either that or consider the us government isn't all powerful and a foreign adversary is fucking around i think it could be this and the u.s. doesn't want to admit it, or shoot them down, to avoid escalating the situation. would it meet the criteria for an act of war? maybe there's actually some truth to them not being able to do it safely as well, idk. > why haven't they attacked? is there any point in such intimidation? if a foreign adversary was in this position, it might be wiser to just attack while everyone's pants are down, but nobody has done so. maybe they need to gather more intelligence with the drones first? i also think our country could be destabilized a lot more than it is now and they are biding their time. > it's probably the military or a third party contracted by them testing and practicing with new drone technology i think this is a possibility too, but then why do it in the way they are? and the officials have no answers, it makes themselves look like liars or incompetent. i just don't get it.
United States