/pol/ for the most part understands that people have agency, so status is not a cause for action, status is the cause of action. the man was rich because he ran an insurance company, as the man in charge, he is ultimately responsible for its claim rejection rate. if you wanted to go any higher than this, you'd blame the courts for ruling the wrong way on ford vs dodge, thus establishing the shareholder primacy that places morally insane people in positions of power and influence. you can always tell roughly where someone's political beliefs lie by figuring out if they believe in agency and consequence of action or not. i've noticed that jews especially seem to be utterly and completely incapable of linking their actions to the consequences they suffer as a result, it's always "for no reason," i'm beginning to suspect it's not even a narrative game, semitics might actually be unable to conceive of cause and effect in relation to themselves.
Australia