> where does paul say, in any of his letters, that the people he met in jerusalem knew the historical jesus? says it in acts. clearly. unavoidably.  > you're just making this fucking shit up, mate, none of paul's letters say that says it in acts and refers to the meeting in galatians. > waaah its all a vision whatever. this is getting silly, just like it did last time. > paul refers to a historical jesus, do christians believe that jesus physically rose from the grave? do you think refering to that counts as evidence that paul believed in a real jesus?  this is insanely unreasonable stuff you're peddling here anon
Canada