these iq tests are designed in such a way that even if you "cheat" at the test it will be more or less accurate within a few standard deviations. christopher langan isn't the type of person to bring up his iq either, it's always other people. > there's no proof he is an intelligent man the proof is everywhere. in his writings, theory and pattern recognition. it all points towards christopher langan being an intelligent man. your assumptions of what an intelligent person "looks" and "sounds" like did not conform with how christopher langan acts, so you simply assume he's not intelligent and call him a fraud. have you ever looked into the ctmu or tried to learn the basics of it? answer honestly. your judgement is completely irrelevant if your answer is "no", or if you only read a short explanation of the theory online. > i'm snopes, motherfuckers, and i'm calling chris langan debunked. de-fucking-bunked! you're reddit.   he demonstrates his abilities constantly. you are not actually demanding proof, otherwise you would look into the proof yourself with a few simple search engine results instead of shutting yourself off from proof like this. other people owe you nothing. > langan once scored highly on an iq test. the simplest and likeliest explanation is he took iq tests multiple times using aliases until he was good at taking them. you contradict yourself. he didn't "once" score highly. he scored highly on iq tests *multiple* times, unless your definition of "highly" is 195 iq which is an extremely absurd definition. how does it make any logical sense whatsoever that he took iq tests multiple times using aliases and suddenly managed to "once" score highly out of nowhere? the simplest explanation is that he's intelligent, far more than you and me.
Sweden