> it's not and there's the problem. it is one of the most expensive forms of energy. there's a reason for why the swedish government is trying to bribe all the energy companies with billions but they are just building wind turbines instead... it's the second cheapest after large hydro but is the lowest carbon dioxide source of energy. your utilities are not backing away from nuclear because it's bad, they are backing away because they know your retarded government might change their mind without notice and leave them with an expensive project they can't finish. also who cares when they can build standby natural gas turbines as part of "wind" turbine backstopping.  pic related but for solar in the us south west. solar and wind is really just natural gas with an expensive hat on.
Canada