cope. archeology has proven that eusebius's account of the phoenician history/mythology of sanchuniathon was correct when the ugaritic/canaanite and hurrian/hittite tablets were discovered. > however that may be, much of what has been preserved in this writing, despite the euhemeristic interpretation given it, turned out to be supported by the ugaritic mythological texts excavated at ras shamra (ancient ugarit) in syria since 1929; otto eissfeldt demonstrated in 1952 that it does incorporate genuine phoenician elements that can now be related to the ugaritic texts, some of which, as shown in extant versions of sanchuniathon, remained unchanged since the second millennium bc. the modern consensus is that philo's treatment of sanchuniathon offered a hellenistic view of phoenician materials written between the time of alexander the great and the first century bc, if it was not a literary invention of philo other medieval writers like tzetzes have also been proven. > in yet another account referred to by robert graves, (who claims to be following the account of the byzantine mythographer tzetzes) it is said that cronus was castrated by his son zeus just as uranus had earlier been castrated by his son cronus. however, the subject of a son castrating his own father, or simply castration in general, was so repudiated by the greek mythographers of that time that they suppressed it from their accounts until the christian era (when tzetzes wrote) > according to a badly mutilated text. baal and his confederates attack el by surprise in his palace on mount sapan and succeed in tying him up and wounding him. apparently "something" falls to the ground, which can be interpreted as the castration of the father of the gods. the hypothesis is plausible, not only because, in similar conflicts for the sovereignty, uranus and the hurrian/hittite god anu are castrated by kumarbi, but also because, despite the hostility he shows to baal
Brazil