> even the historicity of daniel the man is dubious. unlike other prophets, he has no patronymic, profession, or place of origin, and he first appears in historical records when ezekiel the priest, the son of buzi, by the kebar river in the land of the babylonians lists him with the legendary noah and job (ez. 14:13-14, 14:19-20), treating him as what we would normally identify as a mythical hero, among the three heroes of yore possessed of a legendary righteousness and wisdom (ez. 28:2-3). now, which one of these pieces of information is correct? in the event we dont know, perhaps we shouldnt side with people who want to fly a plane into you to get 70 sluts
United States