> of course you can't be spending it on yourself if you're in those circumstances i agree. i think his statement is an insult to the intelligence of his intended audience. it's actually condescending and out of touch that they think they need to state the obvious to their audience. people who are politically invested enough to listen to charlie kirk are generally intelligent enough to know not to waste money if they live paycheck to paycheck. so the whole statement is just a stupid sound bite that can end up hurting his movement. hen pecking is not worth it.
United States