> >religicucks > >1  + 1 = 2 has a purpose!  > >2  derives it purpose from 1 + 1 being 2 and this two has a purpose to exist i did not say that. you said that ... but dishonestly attributed it to me/us. yes, i agree, that is insane.  but you are too stupid to understand that that is a classic straw man argument. congratulations, you destroyed your concoction of what god is, you cancelled yourself. > straw man you keep repeating it, even though it fails. every. single. time. > the rest of your hysterics > evolution > it's a function that will reproduce the optimal algorithm given an input. so let me get this right, not putting words in your mouth. you are saying that the process of evolutionism, which by definition has no purpose (it is the result of trillions upon trillions upon trillions of accidental collisions of molecules, blah blah), operating in an universe that has no order; no purpose; chaos; blah; blah) now has a purpose (function means purpose): > it's a function that will reproduce the optimal algorithm given an input. have i got that right ? if so, that is an hysterical contradiction. i have no problem that you are embedded in hysteria, the hysteria of evolutionism, for me, thanks but no. if i have not got that right, please inform me as to what drugs you are taking, so that i can structure my mind properly in order to understand your hysterics. i have savings and everything. there is a kid with pink hair and a runny nose in the next street, i think you he can score for you.
Australia