tell some people around me and then fuck off because to show up would not be reasonable and would prove no argument of mine correct. except that resurrection was possible, maybe, but that would only be proven to the people i'd meet, and not to anyone else. it is a fact that nobody today witnessed any resurrections, yet people keep trying to "witness" as if they themselves were eye-witnesses to events that happened 2000 years before their births. people just read the story or just hear some vague version of it, really, and then act as if they themselves had witnessed the resurrection of jesus, which is due to us not factoring in any timeline when reading anything, not "deep-down". when people read any fiction, their minds don't place it in time, they "experience it at the moment of reading", which is why reading the story about the resurrection of jesus causes them to witness - in reality, they are witness to having read the story, but in their minds, they are witnessing to the events of the story as they were eye-witnesses to the events themselves. in a sense, they even are, but only to the written records of the events, not to the physical events.
Hungary