i don't think that the tone of the author and their personal paranoias when dealing with hired help have any bearing on the findings. if you can prove that the anomalies are compression artifacting, thats cool. but there's a lot of personal research done here, and most people are too lazy to do that sort of thing -- so i am not surprised that the character and personality of the author are not normie enough for your taste. i don't think assuming a lawyer is compromised is a disqualifier. and if the age of the author is under 25, i dont think finding a lawyer on yt is particularly disqualifying either. that said i'm not assuming his assumptions are fully correct, i just think this is a good effort post and worthy of bumps and further analysis. thanks for sharing your findings on the personality of the author. let me know if you find anything about the quality of his research.
United States