> what we're doing in south korea, japan or germany isn't nation building either. i remeber when islamic terrorist almost captured kyoto last year. good thing the 10th mountian division was there to stop them. > america is already spending billions in syria every year, retard, and bombs assad's forces and allies regularly. we should probably stop doing that. but i don't see how the bombs are any cheaper if they're dropped on assad's enemies instead of his friends. > regime change and the propping up of puppet government is literally the exact same thing aside from the shortest, cheapest part at the beginning. > keeping a stable government > assad > lost half his country > stable government oy vey that's a lot of hutzpah. > he almost certainly would have allowed america access to their old fields so will the rebels. why should we support either when they're both the same? > condition we provide security for him provide security to pay market rates for something we produce ourselves. that's retarded. if we were going to do the securing then the oil fields would be defacto ours and we should take as much as we want for free. > having a stable government in syria is objectively worth not having jihadist terrorists take over, creating mass refugee crises > t.bill kristol except most of our "refugees" come for gibs, not because their home countries aren't stable. the appropriate solution is to just turn them away
United States