> rogan is a successor of sorts, covering simular topics and interest, while alex jones cover er i mean cashies in on the fringe branches. the big thing that separates rogan and jones from art bell is that those two have their own perspective. if they disagree with somebody they will just say, "i think you're full of shit and here's why". if art got a call from a time traveller or whatever, he wouldn't tell them it sounds like bullshit and they need to offer concrete proof, he would run with it. art was a showman first and foremost. his show was more like telling ghost stories around a fire, he didn't care if they were true or not so long as they were entertaining. far from trying to expose his guests and get to the bottom of things, he would help them out to enhance their story. he was more entertainment than information. they both have their place, but it's nearly impossible to duplicate in today's polarized world that demands people take one side or the other.
United States