> you keep saying that but you're completely unable to rebut it. that's the point of a logical fallacy, its designed to be unanswerable. so you are claiming a dishonest lie by claiming > if you dont support a you automatically support b which is not true, and its a logical fallacy because it assumes that other positions don't exist which is not true. as written, you argue from place of deception and dishonesty.    radical people slaughter each other while normal people are the ones that live on.
Poland