> humans for millions of years: exist without any problems > humans when knives are invented, a few thousand years ago: we need to cut off the penis skin or else he will become ill gay society not worth saving > it is also an option for cases of phimosis, other pathologies that do not resolve with other treatments, and chronic urinary tract infections (utis).[3][4] the procedure is contraindicated in cases of certain genital structure abnormalities or poor general health.[4][5] > the procedure is associated with reduced rates of sexually transmitted infections[6] and urinary tract infections.[1][7][8] this includes reducing the incidence of cancer-causing forms of human papillomavirus (hpv) and reducing hiv transmission among heterosexual men in high-risk populations by up to 60%;[9][10] its prophylactic efficacy against hiv transmission in the developed world or among men who have sex with men is debated.[11][12][13] neonatal circumcision decreases the risk of penile cancer.[14] complication rates increase significantly with age.[15] bleeding, infection, and the removal of either too much or too little foreskin are the most common acute complications, while meatal stenosis is the most common long-term.[16] ... some medical organizations take the position that it carries prophylactic health benefits which outweigh the risks, while other medical organizations generally hold the belief that in these situations its medical benefits are not counterbalanced by risk.[17][18][19][20]  trust the science goys!
United States