> namely the attack on the iranian consulate in damascus and nasrallah's assassination, which were pretty humiliating. they are attacking you directly while all you do as retaliation is gay assassinations and terror attacks.the media is going to back you ofc and say how humiliated iran is.its similar to what is happening in ukraine.russia rapes ukraine but the media talks about how humiliated russia is because ukraine occupied 0.1% of russia. if israle would be as powerful as the neocons and the media is pretending then they would be bombing iran by now. > not necessarily, interceptions can be made through trucks, ships, submarines, etc. the cheapest and most effective interceptions against cruise missiles and drones are by airplanes.if you do it with your ground aa it will drain them.ukraine was trying to use their f16s to intercept russian cruise missiles and drones but it didn't worked out because russia just keep bombing airbases all over ukraine.a similar situation could happen with israel. > these attacks aren't sustainable, it's making them bleed money and their financial situation was not good to begin with. without massive financial aid israel wouldn't even be able to sustain their gaza and lebanon war.their ballistics might be limited but iran could keep lobbing drones at israel in large numbers forever.before their ballistics would run out they would devastate your airforce and infrastructure.i would imagine that if their domestic drone manufacturing got hit then russia can start supplying them with their own gerans/shaheeds and they both can pretend that its iranian domestic production just like how nato/ukraine is pretending that the drones ukraine is using are made by them.
Serbia