> genetic fallacy this fallacy avoids the argument by shifting focus onto something's or someone's origins. it's similar to an ad hominem fallacy in that it leverages existing negative perceptions to make someone's argument look bad, without actually presenting a case for why the argument itself lacks merit. you should care less about sources and more about the value of ideas on their own. anyone can come to the conclusion that the protocols are true just by observing objective reality. that's why they need fallacies to dismiss it.
Spain