> gross misinterpretation or intentionally malicious understanding of what i actually said. the swiss pisses and shits himself in public as he screams out in pain from his losing position. "misrepresentation" he shouts, "malicious" he cries. "m-m-my feelings are hurt!" he whimpers. > my point was you dont need to eat copious amounts if fiber to reap the benefits and implying otherwise is disingenuous. you don't need to eat copious amounts of trace minerals such as iron, manganese, copper, iodine, zinc, cobalt, fluoride and selenium. however, you do need significant amounts of foods that contain these trace amounts in order to have enough surface area contact with the intestinal linings to actually absorb them. > meaningless indeed. what you said has no impact on the reality that animal foods nourish us more and more efficiently than plant foods ever could. you still need both. and plants also provide many essential nutrients that meats struggle to provide such as vitamin c (compare vitamin c of beef liver verses green vegetables or an orange). > b-b-but muh simplistic autistic world view demands that i must boil down the answers to all things in life to a single variable too bad. > i'll give the good news to all the vegans who have become weak and/or infertile because the lack of cholesterol has fucked up their steroid hormone production show that it was caused by a lack of cholesterol and not the lack of many other nutrients.
Canada