migrant birds rarely fight for their territory, in fact, they have no territory, this made me understand a bit of /k/ and why they hate /chug/, /chip/ and so on, most of them are rural, people from little cities and town, what you see there is nothing about globohomo or glowies, though they hate them too, but the innate animosity rurals have against anything foreign, for them the russian is even more foreign, more "other" than the jewest jew in nyc, and they know there is an equivalent "jew" in moscow or tehran, so they will celebrate the destruction of the "other" not because they love their urbanite countrymen or their so called "allies" in western europe and israel, if they were given the opportunity within a vacuum they will kill them all, but because they hate even more the other men who flock under a different culture and flag, for them is a land feud, and they will rather have their own rulers dominate over those of the other civilizations   > the same fact, in conjunction with the same arguments, is to be found in the alexandrian, in the roman, and, as a matter of course, in every other civilized society--and conspicuously in that in which buddha grew up. and in hellenism and in the nineteenth century, as in the times of lao-tzu and the charvaka doctrine, there is an ethic for childless intelligence and literature about the inner conflicts of nora and nana. the "quiverful," which was still an honorable enough spectacle in the days of werther, becomes something rather provincial. the father of many children is for the great city a subject for caricature; ibsen did not fail to note it and presented it in his love's comedy. > when you realize both raj and chang already got wrecked by this shit centuries ago too. damn, this explains a lot.
Peru