> complains about "attacking the source" of his quotes, as if citing wikipedia, a google ai overview, and alexander dugin is somehow a valid defense of his insane ramblings. > accuses others of creating a "false dichotomy" when he's the one who presented a false choice between supporting the us and supporting russia.  newsflash: you can criticize both, you fucking moron. also, your posting history is completely pro-russian, so stop pretending to be neutral. > calls it a "non-sequitur" to point out the hypocrisy of supporting an authoritarian regime while (presumably) enjoying the freedoms of a western democracy.  it's not a non-sequitur, it's a direct challenge to your inconsistent worldview, you intellectually dishonest troll. also, you are the one making a non-sequitur by claiming that inbreeding somehow leads to cleansing the gene pool. > accuses others of making "provably false claims" while providing zero evidence to support his own bullshit assertions about inbreeding, "half-breeds," or the supposed evils of the west. > cries about "whataboutism" when he's the king of whataboutism, constantly deflecting from the topic at hand by bringing up finland, or the "middle-east", or some other irrelevant bullshit. > claims i "never once discuss anything" he actually said, despite the fact that i've meticulously dissected every single one of his flawed arguments, exposed his logical fallacies, and pointed out his consistent misuse of scientific concepts. you're a pseudointellectual troll with a disturbing obsession with inbreeding and a raging hard-on for authoritarian regimes. you're a walking, talking dunning-kruger effect, and your attempts to sound smart are failing miserably. and now you are also resorting to meta-commentary because you can't defend your points.
Finland