this is genius. i might actually do this, thanks anon.   what's frustrating is that doing this in a casual conversation usually shows that most leftards on campus aren't *actually* retarded enough to believe all the shit they think they do. you just know how to phrase the question correctly. for example instead of > do you think niggers are a blight on society? asking > do you think that communities with disproportionately high rates of crime most likely have specific issues that need to be addressed at the level of those communities, to solve those specific problems? the former is treated as horrendous while the latter nets an agreement. i used school shootings as an example, and asked if the guy i was talking to and his gf (we share civics 202 and this was lunch the other day) had any ideas on reducing school shootings. they both thought that allowing teachers to arm themselves and beefing up security were good moves, and that paying attention to the mental health of the children would also help, and that profiling students to determine who'd be likely to spaz out would help identify students who needed help before it was too late. all of these are great ideas but then i pointed out that this would mean that the primary targets of profiling would be lgbtq+ due to many of them sharing mental illnesses and social situations with many school shooters, to say nothing of the shooters who were in fact either straight up troons or their allies. they both acted like they got called out for doing a heckin' bigotry, apologized and recanted their stance. it was frustrating.
United States