evola synthesized this in splitting it between sky gods and "cthonic/telluric" (earthen) gods, which tends to take the feel of light vs dark. in his view the sky gods are the aryan, aristocratic, strong gods and the earthen gods are the non-white, communist, weak gods. this is also described as the apollonian vs dionysian split, or as recently as freud it was eros instinct vs thanatos instinct, or passion vs self-destruction. it's a classic thing, probably gets rediscoverd by someone every generation. this theologies were ways to discuss ideas and invisible forces in humanity prior to the modern age. but it always recurs because binary-minded humans are always picking one or the other as the "good" one and setting the other as the "bad" one. these drives reflect two necessary components of life, individual excellence and submission to the group. you could even call them as simplistically as tension and relaxation in my mind. both are going to be part of life. so don't assign one of them to dravidians/blacks/browns because then you'll lock off that part of yourself and remain off-kilter until you can re-incorporate that shadow. i'd argue that the white problem in the modern day is entirely that we've assigned these "lower" drives to other races and demand of ourselves to be high-minded only. being colorblind is high-minded, being identitarian is low-minded, but obviously we need to be more identity-oriented. we need to look at that shadow again.
United States