i cack myself reading this bit: > evolution doesn't have an intentional goal, but the process results in organisms that are well-adapted to their environments ... by natural selection. first, adaptation (no species change, just variation within a species) is not evolution, that (variation in darwin's finches) was debunked 100 years ago. // evolutionism is about one species transforming into another species, accidentally, through mutations (which are always lethal but not in the religion of evolutionism), over millions of years, by millions of the species doing the same freaky thing (the male needs a similarly "mutated" female to mate with, in order to produce "mutated" offspring, for the next generation of "mutateds" to mutate some more) //  so the implied purpose of natural selection is survival of the species (a purpose).   if the species did not adapt to the environment, it would go extinct, no next generation  if the species did adapt to the environement, it would produce offspring in the next generation, and survive, at least one more generation  therefore the process (function; purpose) of life is to reproduce, so that the species will survive now all that is chock full of purpose (process; function; intention; goal), so to say that it has no purpose (no process; function; intention; goal) is hysterically self-contradictory, quite insane. now all that is chock full of purpose (process; function; intention; goal), so to say that it happens "not by design" is to deny the evidence, because a thing with a purpose (process; function; intention; goal) can only be produced by design, not by accident ove millions of years now all that is chock full of purpose (process; function; intention; goal), so to say that it happens "not by design but by natural selection" is a circular argument (like the one atheists falsley claim the christian people do): natural selection hapens by natural selection.
Australia