> imo a natural right is something that every person inherently has or can do which a government can't take away. i will agree to the extent that in a world where jews are constantly trying to kill us, such protections would be necessary. but this artificial, jew-run world isn't exactly what we would call natural. perhaps i was assuming too much, but a conversation centered around the meaning of "natural law" usually means: > so how are we going to run things when the jews are gone? most conversations about law can't even be had because of clown world. so let's assume the hypothetical world where all jews are gone and, at the very least, we have an all-white society and niggers are nowhere to be seen. is your definition of natural law the same in this situation?
United States