the press can be biased but they typically aren't going to fabricate blatantly false stories. what incentive would fox news or msnbc have to blatantly lie about shit if testimony from the thing the reporting on or an expose piece from the other side could come out about them? it makes no sense. trump went to georgia. msnbc can report about it and say "that his arrival there was nothing more than a narcissistic press tour" and fox news could say "that him being there was a true representation of what a leader looks like". in this example both outlets are slanting it in their preferred partisan direction but they're not lying about what actually happened.
United States