i believe that in a liberal democracy all points of view must be tolerated. by "views" i mean expressions of opinion. the only thing that should be limited is the means. democracies (in theory) provide the means to peacefully assert points of view. if society sees them as a good thing, they will succeed. if the majority of the citizenry wants intolerance, what's wrong with that? the only thing that must be limited in democracy are certain means (mainly violence) to achieve the ends, but never the ends themselves. the opposite is dictatorship.
Spain