> george washington was based af. just because he was a mason doesn't mean he wasn't. don't get me wrong, i agree. masons used to be based, until the 1800s when they were infiltrated by secular cucks. i was just asking because i myself align with masonic ideas; i was invited to be a mason and rejected because of how lodges work these days. masons created a great country, the us was quite decent in its primordial state.
Portugal