> so now for the political implications? twitter is still better than it was before. i'll gladly trade being censored on multiple topics of social importance in exchange for not being able to criticize one autist.   > if the government is banned from stripping you from your rights, but corporations are allowed to ... that's just retarded. suppose twitter decided to shut down operations and sell its assets. would that be a violation of the free speech rights of all of its users?
United States