> muh prarie niggers several groups of nomadic tribes wandering around north america in a land of almost unlimited natural bounty for 10,000 years and never actually establishing permanent cities, borders, nations, and a concept of ownership is a terrible parallel to the history of the middle east. even so, the jews conquered canaan (an actual established civilization with walled cities and a language group that we are still part of to this very day) and were also dispossessed of their lands several times by other conquerors. i don't see anyone weeping for white americans being invaded by mexicans and other brown third worlders, and i doubt that 2,000 years from now if some white icelandic person decided they wanted to move back to north america and lay claim to the entire united states because some people he also pretends he was related to (since modern day european jews who founded israel are not descended from the original jacobin israelites) i doubt that the entire planet would be forced to unite together to talk about his plight and the need for his "homeland" to be returned to him. yet every single person here talking about the injuns will suck jewish cock. also, conquering a wild continent inhabited by stone age savages who never built anything is far different from swindling an established and important civilization out of their ancestral homeland. there would be no nation at all on this continent were it not for the white men who conquered it, tamed it, and built the great cities and established the government here. injuns had 10,000 years alone here and accomplished nothing aside from murdering each other and stagnating. the two events are not the same and only a pea-brained pseudo intellectual lefty-pol faggot would dare to insinuate otherwise.
United States