ill crack out the ol copy pasta. so there is a dispute between lolberts known as yellow and purple. yellow lolberts simply want to sell drugs to children. purple lolberts want to sell children for drugs (ideally as under-age sex slaves) the lolbert community (much like antifa) has a huge infestation of pedophiles within its ranks. this isnt all too surprising as the relativist lolbert world view of let people do whatever they want is very attractive to degenerates. yellow lolberts have tried to keep their ideology vaguely respectful (and less of a meme) however in a debate if both parties are reasonably intelligent the purple libertarian will always come out victorious. the yellow lolbertarian is working from the same playbook as the purple, one which prizes freedom above all, but is calling for the restriction of freedoms that the purple is not. the purple is the trhu lolbertarian.  this largely stems from the nap which can be ignored within reasonable debate but within lolbert discussion it is a necessary fixture. it is one that has deep flaws that enable the rampant growth of degeneracy and the domination of purple lolberts. > but why?? the nap is a negative moral system. it is a system that claims nothing to be good only bad. aggressing against or directly causing harm to someone is bad.  all actions which do this are immoral (tho why i have no idea), actions which do not do this are moral. thus the pedophile who stands on the sidewalk, publicly pleasuring himself to the sight of children is doing nothing wrong as he has not directly caused me harm.  as a lolbert would say > you can always just walk away and thus, this man, simply through the act of not running up and cracking me over the skull, is a moral person.
Australia