actually, there is one more point. 7. how much preference falsification for not being ethnocentric is downstream of the comparatively low social cost and cognitive capacity required to defend the easy-to-communicate, easy-to-defend, and simplistic, libertarian pro-meritocracy ethos, as compared to a more nuanced risk analysis, as i have exposed above? contrary to occam's razor in the hard sciences, i find that the easiest point to make in the anthroposphere isn't always the correct one.
Anarcho-Capitalist