megalpolis - the /pol/ review  first, yes, coppola is a shitlib boomer. and this movie makes that clear. but i still think it's a worthwhile watch as a piece of art but, also, because it actually does have some interesting things to say. lots of spoilers if you haven't seen it, which i think /pol/ should (even if you wait for an hd rip once this goes to vod). benefit of the doubt but why give coppola benefit of the doubt? pedowood is run by jews and we get a lot of antiwhite, antinationalism, prokike, antimale propaganda. but that's the thing, coppola isn't of the tripe and was part of the revolutionary crew of filmmakers who broke in doing things his way (which admittedly included jews, sure). as an example, apocalypse now is a great movie and it wasn't "anti war" or "pro war" (both of which, were kiked messaging) but rather a "anti bs" movie that criticized war mongers who insisted everything was fine while anti war activists pretended we couldn't win.  megalopolis is no apocalypse now, but it did struggle to get the light of day because hollywood did not want to finance it even 20 years ago when coppola was willing to make it on a low-budget. for comparison, this is different from george lucas' situation with the star wars prequels in that they were easily greenlit once lucasfilm made star wars popular again with the special editions and shadows of the empire project, even with them being very much true to lucas' vision. similar to lucas, coppola is a shitlib boomer, but it still has very interesting things to say and there's a reason why so many on /pol/ love the prequels. this is similar to the megalopolis situation, but with the caveat that something about it made even jews hesitant to fund, and coppola had a similar situation with tucker which got blacklisted. you may say, well, because it wouldn't make money. but anyone who pays attention knows jews are wiling to fund things that seem like shit and obviously won't make money all the time especially if it fits an agenda. (cont'd)
United States