i never said once that all history is fake. i'm not going to provide one example because you can take five minutes of your time to search for one online. your attempt to "appeal to history" is hilarious when it's high-school liberal indoctrination view of world history. i'm the one that should be asking you how monarchy is inherently bad or even different enough in expression to posit that democracy is somehow better. the historical precedent for this argument does not exist. at their core most governments are similar in expression(save for some radical tankie collective farming), simply due to the vast majority of functions being identical or analogous. power is immutable and ideology only changes so much of how you can color between the lines.  governments historically are compared to how the performed in line with their contemporaries. this also has more to do with general levels of competence, greedy and corruption. all societies inevitable go through stages of decline. op is right in the sense that a non degenerated society can "get by" even with the worst system. but even that has long term consequences. you won't magically remove the human condition by changing governments or gassing jews(although gas certainly helps). efficacy of a government is more complicated than just aesthetic or ideological considerations. you are fucking retarded. democray and republics have been around since antiquity. they are not some magical evolution in form of governance.
Fascist