he should've started with the ancient concept of "social contract" instead that can be understood by everyone. no need to talk about what some lefty revolutionaries said, especially when mandela and gandhi themselves were violent - or would've been if they had the chance in gandhis case. > when the government fails to secure their natural rights or satisfy the best interests of society, citizens can withdraw their obligation to obey or change the leadership through elections or other means including, when necessary, violence. when the laws are made explicitly so some pharma kikes can fraud people out of treatment that could save their lives, then violence is a duty.
Finland