> boomers have not been learning to use a computer for half a century right, they've had decades to learn how to use the fucking things and have neglected to do so, that's the point. the youngest boomer would've been around 13 years old when home computers hit the market, they've had a better opportunity than anyone else to become proficient in using them > cursive has been around longer than the computer but a child hasn't. you mong. it doesn't matter how much longer cursive's been around than computers when *both* have been around longer than any child today. the child has had the same amount of time to learn both. meanwhile, computers have been around for *less time* than the boomers themselves. the boomer has the time advantage over a child on learning *both*. that's why the comparison in the first post was fucking retarded.
United Kingdom