i don't think murdering a child with down's syndrome is necessarily bad if the hundreds of thousands of dollars which would have been devoted to their care is given to another child. the issue is that abortion is always a front for antinatalism and childfree ideology. if we can execute children with down syndrome before they're born based upon a rationale that makes life better for other children, it is not necessarily subversive given the enormous costs involved in western countries. any ethical person with down syndrome would want to be killed in the womb to benefit others, anyways.
United States