> the plot thickens... the alleged burial of jesus christ in shing, aomori prefecture, japan, is based on a local legend that gained prominence in the 1930s. according to this legend, jesus did not die on the cross but instead switched places with his younger brother, isukiri, who was crucified in his stead. jesus then fled to japan, where he lived as a garlic farmer, married a local woman named miyuko, and had three daughters. he is said to have died at the age of 106 and was buried in one of two burial mounds in shing. the story became widely known after the discovery of the takenouchi documents in 1936, which are now believed by most scholars to be a hoax. these documents were reportedly destroyed during world war ii, making it impossible to verify their authenticity. despite this, the legend has persisted, and a museum dedicated to the story was established at the site of the alleged tomb. the legend of jesus burial in japan is not widely accepted by mainstream christianity or historical scholars. it is considered a local curiosity and a tourist attraction rather than a credible historical claim. when was japan...?   > the irony that   > >unironically more believable >    (op) (op) (op) > >> jesus is buried in japan you dummy. you can go and visit his grave. > what makes you think there was any irony there?
DEUS VULT