> yeah no there isn't. you're presumably thinking of the passage by tacitus which doesn't even contain the word "jesus". here and elsewhere even in some of your most recent replies you say that the reference to "christus" in tacitus annals is nonspecific, implying it could have been referring to anyone but elsewhere you claim that the roman record was tampered with, implying christians tampered with tacitus annals to inlcude a reference to jesus christ, but you are also claiming it does not reference jesus christ. you are too mixed with african blood to understand the nuance i guess but your claims are blatantly contradictory here, does tacitus include a reference to jesus that christians forged into his annals? or is the reference to "christus" nonspecific and not about jesus at all fink you dumb fucking kike fink! use your fucking head!
United States