what the fuck are you talking about literally a third of respondents in the image you posted (n=480) were independents? there were even more independents than republicans in that sample? less than 40% of your sample were dems.  your own sample is literally for registered voters as well which are significantly more likely to have a party affiliation than the general population. a 1/3rd independent split on that basis is absolutely more than reasonable.    > "then", "they", "are" are adverbs that need to modify a word. are you literally retarded? of those 3 only 'then' is an adverb. 'they' is a pronoun. 'are' is a verb. 'actually' is an adverb acting on the verb, 'are'.  holy fuck you are stupid.    > if the polling stays the same but he loses this must win state and wins another state what even is the point at that point? you're arguing margins mean he has the possibility to pick up states while refusing harris do the same.  > 'the only way harris can win if she loses this state is if she wins one of three other states with similar margins' > 'if trump loses pa he has to win this one extra state to win'  > 'trump has more options!'
United Kingdom