> im telling you that there comes a point where cheating hard enough requires more infrastructure and the statistical probability of cheating becomes practically undeniable. if 99% of eligible voters picked trump, it is impossible for another candidate to win because there are not enough voters left to rig the election. the same concept casts doubt on any election where the percentage of eligible voters who actually voted shot up dramatically, especially if that percentage drops the following election with essentially the same candidates. also, just so i can't be accused of cherrypicking... this is a very convoluted and complex conspiracy. why would they care about whether or not it's undeniable? enough idiots already believe that it was rigged such that trump got elected. what "infrastructure" would be required to rig an election, by the way? how scalable is this infrastructure? precisely how many more "rigging apparatuses" are required to rig an election of 2020 to another of an arbitrary size? what are the "statistical probabilities" you're talking about and how did you calculate them?
United States