> no, thy is not what im acting like, because threats are also not force. so why is armed robbery and terroristic threats a crime?  > they will succeed at many doors, but not mine. you're implying only someone with a bunker and enough arms to combat the government deserve rights? is it cool then to punch a baby and take their ice cream cone because they're less strong?  i see the darwinian point to your argument but it has limits. despite civilian militias being constitutional they've been systematicity subverted and dismantled. there are less protectors in the population which allows overreach.
United States