> the first hospital diagnosed her with strep throat without investigating her sharp abdominal cramps. at the second, she screened positive for sepsis, a life-threatening and fast-moving reaction to an infection, medical records show. but doctors said her six-month fetus had a heartbeat and that crain was fine to leave. > now on crains third hospital visit, an obstetrician insisted on two ultrasounds to confirm fetal demise, a nurse wrote, before moving her to intensive care. > by then, more than two hours after her arrival, crains blood pressure had plummeted and a nurse had noted that her lips were blue and dusky. her organs began failing. > hours later, she was dead. so which thing killed her and how would removing the dead baby help when she already has sepsis and going into organ failure? the first and second hospitals fucked up and neither for "abortion". the article then goes a lot of wild speculation for woulda, coulda, shouldas about the doctor's decisions when a simplier explanation exists: malicious compliance. i have just as much evidence that this law and bouncing the patient around because they were "scared" caused her lack of treatment as i do that they intentionally let her die because they're liberal faggots who want dead bodies to parade around the news media. they are in no way beyond doing such things as seen in my earlier mention of a case where an abortion advocate covered up for a child rape while still wanting to use the case itself to further her political bullshit.
United States