in america a defendant is entitled the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law. karen agnifilo, luigi's attorney has been described as gracefully ferocious. this is why a "mountain" of evidence doesn't mean much to a trained, seasoned attorney. when agnifilo and luigi's defense team get up there and look at the evidence they will put together a masterclass performance to make you think this mountain of evidence the prosecution supposedly has is nothing more than a mountain of trash that blows away. luigi was paraded around, his credibility destroyed in the state of new york. karen is going to pull up the news clips where the mayor said "we got the killer, i wanted to look the killer in the eye." mayor adams has already called luigi guilty in the court of public opinion. there also is a lot of prosecutorial overreach going on with these charges. this is a simple homicide case. why do the feds need to charge luigi with 4 counts if the state of new york already has 11 counts? when you overcharge you put too much pressure on the jury. luigi may walk on a technicality. simple is always sweet. it's the same situation as the daniel penny case. when you have prosecutors that get overzealous, cause they feel that political pressure and all those color justice warriors, mistakes are made. there is a lot of corporate pressure, a lot of dollars on the state of new york to prosecute luigi. that could backfire on them big time.
United States