> troops on ground = bad > money = good > we have basically infinite money and not infinite troops nope. again moving goalposts, and not even doing a good job, kek. first it was "no wars", then it was "well we're not in a war", now it's "well we're in a war, but we're just giving money". > let's spend trillions on this ah, so you're a kike. no, i'd rather not. and besides, this deflection into money vs troops ignores the real point: we are in a war. a proxy war is still a war. we didn't have that under trump. but please, keep suggesting that the russia war, the gaza war, the lebanon war, and the iran war starting under biden "doesn't count", but trump's inherited war that he ended "does count" because every extra person that sees your post, and my response, the more informed they become and the more likely they are to vote for the peace president trump.
United States