i'm being serious. the doctors are making a choice of how to minimize their liability/exposure. they would have proceeded with the procedure had they felt it less risky than not proceeding. evidently, they did not. so does it make sense for a long game? neither that. you can't show imminent harm to some already dead person to get an injunction. as retarded as some random pink hair bitch screaming about her pussy is, this was more thought through
United States