> also, countries aren't real anon, they are made up abstract concepts created by men who wanted to create an idea that can raise the vibration of their culture for their own blood sure, a country is an abstract concept, and you can use that argument to invalidate the legitimacy of a country, but "money" is an abstract concept as well, and i suppose at the end of the day it's one abstract concept (country) vs another abstract concept (money). > because the soil is flooded with all sorts of people from all over the world who have embraced the central banking debt slavery culture, its not my blood or culture and i have absolutely nothing of value there. we can at least agree that debt slavery is ultimately a voluntary choice. that it is not something that anyone is forced into, but a conscious decision to accept in exchange for some tangible good or service. we have free will so that we can make both good and bad decisions. all these commie fags who signed off their soul for wealth and power did so of their own free will, and you can argue that it's only the few rich and powerful who did this, but i disagree. the average person in a communist society would absolutely sell out, and they'll give anything, their own children even, for some money. the failure of their nation is not solely the fault of their politicians, but it's all their faults. their politician represents the will of the people, and if their politician is a corrupt communist, then their people is as well to some degree. and hitler's economy was based on labor, not jewish financial concepts like interest. you provide physical or intellectual labor towards the good of the state (25 points of nsdap) in exchange for money, but you don't sit around and collect debt payments from your fellow countrymen.
United States