you seem to completely misunderstand fascist philosophy. germany massively increased private firearm ownership under the national socialists, meanwhile hitler was driving around in a mercedes-benz convertible shaking hands with the crowds and so forth. he was far more vulnerable to being assassinated than any politician in western countries as a result of this. but other than the bomb attack most of the way through the war, hitler was never attacked. the concept of a strongman is sort of vague most of the time, because the "strongmen" are more accountable to the ordinary people than any democratically elected person in the west today, who draw their power and authority from the oligarchs that own and run everything. the core tenant of fascism is that the nation, and the state, should be the same thing. they are totally merged and interconnected, which when you think about what a state is, makes perfect sense. it is ironically, the most fundamental representation of the nation. the "strongman" is just one guy, and as a result is extremely vulnerable. their power is merely the embodiment of the people and nothing more. there is no "ultimate power" at all. once again, extremely ironically, there is no state that is closer to anarchy than a fascist state, because the organic formation of the nation has no other boundaries within this political arrangement. it is as natural as the family unit, and as a result represents only the embodiment of the forces of nature, which is what anarchists claims mankind should be subordinated to and nothing else.   in an actual society, that's not true. but we're so far from actual societies at this point that i don't even know where to begin to start explaining what i mean.
Pirate