> not only that, conventional ground warfare of thousands of retarded soldiers storming fortified trenches is a thing of the past. thats why russia is so dumb, they fight a war like its 1919. that is what happens when air power is neutralized by anti-air, retard. america could only dominate third-world countries because america had complete air supremacy. we flew a-10 warthogs and predator/reaper nonstop blowing up everything that moves. we also had mass surveillance via both satellites and drones. the moment we wiped out their radars they were completely blind. moreover, we would wipe out their communications networks(they had no starlink) so that central command often couldn't even talk to the men on the frontlines except through short-range handheld radios. furthermore, what changed during wwii was what is called "maneuver warfare". mechanized forces can essentially punch through poorly-defended lines, surround enemy forces, and capture sometimes tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of soldiers at a time who were cut off. this was only possible through the element of surprise. which is impossible when your enemy has spy satellites/drones which can detect any troop movement/buildup, and where the men on the ground have a live feed via starlink communications. if america can't establish air supremacy, america would have to fight just like russia is now. and in a wwiii scenario, all space satellites will be knocked out, on every side. we will all be forced into wwii or wwi-style warfare. and this doesn't even consider the use of strategic nuclear weapons.
United States