> for the record, you replied to my post - not the other way around, yeah...and you lost track of the discussion... > because that's what has been done under the umbrella of individualism. kind of like how christianity is judged by those who identify as christians, yet do not follow the doctrine...you need to learn to comprehend, before you respond. the rest of your comment is irrelevant as it is based on a false understanding of my position.  > like your 5... what you attribute to individualism, is actually a fault of statism. you are correct to say the concept is no loner adhered to, but that does not mean that the concept is flawed. it is just not taught/understood and protected...understand? > also, human rights work on an international level, civil rights on a national level - they're not synonymous.  they absolutely are...one is the principal, the other is based on it...
United States