an error is an error. period. the error in question is a simple matter of a label, a classification, laid upon someone in an erroneous, and i daresay, fraudulent manner in the first place in order to provoke the very reaction you are expressing in your post. they purposely laid a false label upon a person, a child or whatever, to give bleeding hearts a conniption fit if they dared question it. the harms were done by the error / false labeling, but you would posit a new, entirely theoretical harm that might occur if the error / false label were corrected. isn't it better for an error to be corrected? wouldn't it be more mentally healthy for the child to know that the adults are trying very hard to "get it right" in an honest and error-free way? > wrong society wtf do you even mean by that? the correction of an error is to be valued over a sloppy and fraudulent process purposely engineered to cause just these sorts of problems, thereby ensuring that the error stands with the force of law and they get their fraudulent voter base simply by waving their arms and saying "but think about the children!!!" when they didn't give a fuck in the first place and saw nothing wrong with abusing those children in this way in the first place.
United States