> neither has reason to believe that the other keeps a his end of the bargain. which is exactly why i explained that my proposal can only happen in natural, homogeneous countries.  > mutually beneficial trade why not just share when you can, instead? > what you understand by it > the action or activity of buying and selling goods and services. > in utter disregard for the social misengineering and botched eugenics of the past +300yrs so you're trying to tell me that sharing won't connect people and stop the from being dependent on outside forces? you really have to start explaing your thoughts because they make no sense.  > as it's just implicit trade > have a portion of (something) with another or others. no, it's clearly not as you can see. > personal agency what is your personal agency as a single, unique and sovereign individual and how is that going to help you when you're a minority in your own country?    > the action or activity of buying and selling goods and services. > have a portion of (something) with another or others. they are not, the first has a condition while the second doesn't.  > if i don't like with you you wont get my resources for free or for money people don't like these that rule them yet obey them. everyone can be put in a situation where they will have to, which is why they want to take everything from us.
Bulgaria