who said i hate che? exactly the opposite. i wore a che shirt in high school and my appreciation for him has only ever grown since then. my only criticisms are that his action-oriented philosophy was ill-suited to his administrative duties in the post-revolution cuban government (although he devoted himself admirably) and that his not-very-latent death wish caused him to doom himself in bolivia, where the context was completely different. his own books are all about how the support of the local population is necessary for a revolution to succeed; in bolivia the exact opposite was true. still i think he was one of the most admirable humans of the 20th century.   > words don't mean anything listen man i get what you're saying and sympathize with what you mean- and largely agree that centralized control over industry and society will inevitably lead to corruption and violation of human liberty- but you're doing some heavy-duty conflation and melting together of meanings there.    > the browns were supposed to defeat and replace the whites in na so "the whites" are mafia sex traffickers, intelligence agencies, big banks, international corporations and huge corrupt landholders? this is whose side you're on? because that's exactly who's pushing "globohomo" as well   che was anti-imperialist not anti-white   > pol pot is communist! so if you say you don't like big banks you have to support pol pot! shitty bait.   i think he's both a cautionary tale and hero story. the two aren't mutually exclusive.
United States