> this btfos all current established narratives in space surrounding all of the currently believed stances like distance of stars, age of universe, and expansion of the universe multiple lines of evidence support the current cosmological model. the cosmic microwave background radiation provides strong evidence for the big bang and cosmic expansion. observations of type ia supernovae show time dilation effects consistent with redshift due to the expansion of the universe. the large-scale structure of the universe, including the distribution of galaxies and the cosmic web, aligns with models of cosmic expansion. the proposed mechanism cannot account for these observations. it doesn't explain the uniformity of the cosmic microwave background, the large-scale isotropy and homogeneity of the universe, or the observed correlation between redshift and distance known as hubble's law. > red shift is nothing more than hydrogen content within an astronomical body, nothing more empirical observations contradict this claim. spectra from astronomical objects show redshifted lines from various elementsnot just hydrogenincluding helium, carbon, oxygen, and many others. all spectral lines are shifted by the same factor, independent of their elemental origin, which cannot be explained by hydrogen content affecting only hydrogen lines. additionally, the redshift observed in distant galaxies is consistent across all wavelengths, whereas the paper's model predicts a dependency on the initial wavelength, which is not observed. known local effects like pressure broadening or the stark effect can cause shifts in spectral lines, but these are much smaller than the redshifts observed on cosmological scales and have characteristic signatures that are not present in the data.
Sweden