> what is your argument against having a multipolar world? i can agree to that once the other potential poles are civilized places. also, what does it even mean in the end? new cold war and clash of political systems? > why shouldnt other powers have spheres of influence?  if their influence keeps people poor and unhappy, they shouldn't. > and why should the unipolar power be nato/usa? because the west is the best and us army guarantees a relative peace between nations. we should be cooperating for betterment of humanity rather than beat each other over scraps of iron, modern western society is built around that idea and gives just enough personal freedom to let people feel secure and happy.
Poland