lemme simplify it for you. *you* made the claim that he said he's going to "increase legal immigration", and instead of proving it yourself, you're asking others to prove/disprove it. so you can't point to where he said he's going to increase legal immigration? got it. > he believes, only after such vetting has taken place, we ought to keep the most skilled graduates who can make significant contributions to america. this would only apply to the most thoroughly vetted college graduates who would never undercut american wages or workers, leavitt (trump press secretary) said in a statement second, the green cards isn't for *all* students. it's only for the most vetted students that won't undercut wages. you are still assuming it's for all students, even when the campaign clarified it. > b-but he said "we need a lot of people!" i say i want a lot of food when i'm hungry, but i'm not setting eating records, lmfao. you've built up an entire argument on lies, assumption, and mental gymnastics to make up shit to whine about, lmfao. so no, he never said he was going to "increase legal immigration", and the green cards policy isn't for all students (it's only for the most thoroughly vetted students that won't undercut wages), not all students. your argument based on a foundation of lies is just bullshit, lmfao. this is all a nice deflection btw. it's easy to point at one out of two choices and overly fixate on the negatives. you're here in bad faith (or you're retarded), so for the other anons here, i'll present them a common sense choice: > trump brings in highly qualified candidates while shutting down kamala's wide open border where anyone comes in > kamala brings in 25 million illegal immigrants to turn swing states perma blue and make it a one party rule and rape our kids yeah i'm going with option a. for the other anons here in good faith, vote trump and get your entire family to vote for trump.
United States