the thing about ancient phenotypes is you can't really accurately trace skin color, but you can trace recessive dominant traits like like eyes and hair and average height. if you believe modern dating techniques, there are thousands of individual samples of extremely ancient y-dna i males from all over europe that had blue eyes. and because genotypes and phenotypes are not mutually exclusive and are in fact directly related, this means that it is extremely more likely for a blue eyed skeleton marker to have had olive or pure white skin like modern white men than for them to have been le nigres with blue eyes (a bullshit psyop provably incorrect). it is also likely that the vinca culture was related to y-dna i's directly, yet another european "barbarian" culture that actually had script and advanced city and mound building.  the phoenician script is younger than the hittite script and cuneiform is actually more attested in known ie cultures than in semetic ones, part of the evidence that the oldest systems known were actually not complete isolates but pre-proto proto ie. phoenician is also not logically descended from ancient egyptian in attestations and glyph graphs. eastern semetics (the oldest ones) actually merged with aryan cultures and not the other way around.  true unknown isolates are like the euskara, but they also have another link to ie peoples in genetics in the fact that northern european ies average 15-50% rh negative blood, like the euskara.
United States