> no they're not. right, that's why they all go to sanctuary cities when asked where they want to go to, where they get free housing, free healthcare, etc. that's why when they were interviewed on tv, several said "it's cold here waiting in lines, i think i'm gonna go back home," etc. these are low iq shitheads. anyway, you're deflecting from my point of them being incentivized to stay here because of benefits, and removing those benefits makes them less incentivized to stay here. allowing ice to target sanctuary cities allows ice to move in. being a sanctuary cities means you don't have to comply with ice. once you're forced to, then you have no choice. > why are you deflecting from trump?  deflecting ? you said he has no plan, i offered a plan. then started whining and bitching about it, as if you're an immigration expert. the real question isn't "does trump have a perfect plan", it's "given these two candidates, who has a better plan," and trump not only has a plan, he has an excellent plan. > how is he going to forcefully remove 40 million illegals from the country?  i'll simplify this for you. ice is basically a police force to deal with immigration. ice wasn't allowed to target sanctuary cities under biden. under trump they'll allowed. ice will deport them. however they do it, i don't care. all i know is, they'll take care of it. > you mean the first term where he deported less people than obama? bringing up obongo again. you sure do love that nigger for some reason. here's all you need to know. we're perfectly satisfied with his first term's performance. it was excellent, we got more that we could've imagined. and we're excited for his second term. we don't give a shit if the first term wasn't perfect. no one is, no policy is perfect, and nothing is permanent. we'll just keep fighting to incrementally improve things if we have to, and trump is /ourguy/ and we're not go back to the last four years with kamala. we're still voting trump.
United States