why nietzsche was a retard  they never fail to show up, the 22 yo nietzsche aficionados, when they sea a picture of their idol, they crawl like roaches, be my witness: > the most dangerous creation of any society is the man who has nothing to lose james a. baldwin it's not about having nothing to lose, it's about having nothing to win, which leads to making other people lose the only available strategy. you gotta be a big fat retard like nietzsche, obsessing over muh winner, to miss this crucial distinction and not be able to integrate resentment into your worldview (banishing it to a backworld). cultural diselection > natural selection having nothing to lose implies risk taking, aggressive behavior, desperation and bold actions; all geared towards increasing your own payoff. what we are discussing here is spoiler behavior, vengeance. imagine you're in a traffic jam on the highway. a guy overtakes everyone by driving on the emergency lane when suddenly, another person snaps, crashes into the guy's car, and pushes it off the bridge. this person had absolutely nothing to gain from this action; in fact, they lost everything since they will now face prosecution for this homicide. who benefits from this mad avenger's action? the community. i would even go so far as to say that this blind vengeance is the only entirely altruistic type of action. and if nietzsche failed to incorporate this idea into his philosophy, it's because he built it on selfishness. > predicted everything were living through. > lmao get fucked you irrelevant faggot. nietzsche entire's moral philosophy is the tunnel-bound view a mouse has from the hole it hides in. it's like chicken flesh detaching from a bone in filaments as you play with it while on shrooms. it has no consistency and the only thing worthy of being preserved in nietzsche philosophy is that he predicted himself.
France