> he was part of it, he blocked the guy and followed him, being part of his capture. he may have incriminated himself while he explained what they were doing and what specifically his role was. he was with them, on board with the plan. if the others confirmed he was meant to block him, he's part of what led to his murder. 1) you can't call it a murder when trying to justify the crime.  2) there's no dispute about them working in concert, you're avoiding the actual issue because you know you're wrong and trying to use shitty psychological techniques to avoid having to justify it.  it was a lawful citizens arrest. the judge fundamentally abdicated his duty as judge by allowing the jury to interpret the law. they'll be retried and released. so will chauvin.
United States