> [evolutionism] is a theory  no. it is a bunch of speculation upon speculation upon speculation upon speculation, none of which have been proved, which proof is required for a speculation to advance from the category of speculation to the category of theory second it is a collection of speculations. it is falsely called a "theory" > and one that hasn't been disproven entirely every single idiotic speculation is easily proved false (even though the burden of poof lies with the speculator, and the speculator cannot prove it true). the collection is false because each of the speculations are false, even though proving one speculation false is enough to prove the collective false.
Australia