> your not really, and suvorov isn't the first nor the last historian to expose the myth of the "good and gullible" soviets who were the victim of wwii and dindunuffin. and the numbers of soviet equipment and troops are generally recognized as valid, every historian acknowledges the fact that by june 1941 the ussr had more tanks and other military machines that the entire west combined. you can start by first acquainting yourself with people such as petro grigorenko, and then move on to others like solonin, bushuyeva etc. in fact, nowadays more and more historians are starting to lend credence to the pre-emptive attack theory, however, it will never become mainstream due to the ww2 foundation myth that has become the cornerstone of both the western (holohoax) and eastern (great patriotic war) modern zeitgeist. > you communism wasn't boogeyman at all, imagine being such deluded useful idiot tankie to think communism has only spread prosperity and peace among the nations of the world. > the they didn't encircle those 2 millions at one and the same time. the soviets were merely caught with their pants down. > the there were no military drills during that period, unless you can prove otherwise. and i'm still waiting for some sort of an explanation for the massive and numerous ammo storehouses and equipment concentrated on the german-soviet border. > red sources for those claims? (1/2)
Bulgaria