> because there's nothing in the term "arms" that could reasonably be assumed to apply only to firearms. obviously. just as obvious as the 2a refering to the people carrying guns as individuals, not a malita. but that's not stopped statist scum gaslighting people. if we were to follow the 2a as instructed, all forms of weapons would be covered. nukes, tanks, knives, rocks, sarin gas, etc. governments fear armed subjects, hence we see the state of affairs as is.
United Kingdom