> i understand it in my mind, but words fail to get it across. it is only possible for one supernatural all powerful being to exist, because in the case of separate entities, there would be separate wills, and thus enmity between the two/three/four/etc entities. meaning there would be no one purpose and one meaning for humanity, and there would be different forms of god on earth (that is humans), because each of those gods would want their own version of themselves one earth, with their own version of humans. does that make sense? hmm well, they often do. and that is precisely why people are not like "one god" of your belief and instead are not only different - but also switch the sides. i think your idea is highly idealistic. there is no example in nature (using aristotel here kek) that something came from one thing. that something has one parent and so on. these are ideas that show longing for idealism - "there can only be one", "i am the best" and so on. this is a good propaganda because a lot of people would be attracted to the idea of superiority if it wasn't a lie. which it is, because it is not provable. you will have a much harder time having a sign from god than me. > personal revelations.  so they do not exist. > on the seventh day, god ceased to create. concerning primitive peoples, no. god from the very beginning created humans to be the form of god on earth, modeled after himself. but he obviously did not create you directly, right? you do believe you came from your parents? so if he created those apes after his image ...ufff...i am starting to see a lot of blind spots here..and man the question with free will and morality is getting sharper. > well, first of all people have a choice to do either one of two things; god's will, or not god's will.  i think that is rather stale. choices are made before the execution of body. is this not what the science people have been saying? i feel like you are packaging emotions, instincts etc together
Japan