sounds like the deal is in a bit too precarious waters for that to be true. besides trump aimed his ire at gaza, not israel, for failure to reach a deal. and so far i and everyone else have seen the latter be uncharacteristically flexible, so shifting the blame for a failed deal on israel is unlikely to succeed. if that happens i would not be surprised if trump permits israel to just sift through the north's populace completely, killing anyone that does not surrender to processing to verify their innocense. naturally this would be a bloody affair, and unlike their earlier islamic melodrama this would indeed border on genocide, though if done properly it would remain below that threshold. additionally it would be trivial to annex part of gaza afterwards, if that is indeed the intent.
Netherlands