unless bong land is different, in civilized parts of the world (and canada for some reason) defamation suits need to prove that the defamatory remarks caused some sort of [financial] harm. it's going to be difficult for tate to 'prove' that some random hole on the internet making an accusation caused him financial harm for which punitive measures are required. andrew tate is actually a rapist though. he confided it to me drunk back in the summer of '89.
Canada