> >elect based on "seats" unironically due to contrarianism not to follow the french and the nationalization of institutions when the rest of the world has.  we larp as medieval fiefs where the country is run by each baron sending his emissary to the capital instead of having a proper central government set by the whole nation. technically the king could fill up that space but he's been reduced to posturing since the (((glorious))) revolution. besides the economic and social life is still even more concentrated on the capital than in any other west european country so you can't argue about muh decentralization.  none of it makes any sense.
United Kingdom