what is the solar constant up there? on ground level it is about 1.36kw per square meter. that comes to 1360000kw for a square kilometer or 1.36gw. now we have to realize that officially solar panels claim to get 22-25% efficiency, but if you calculate the actual efficiency for a usual 2 square meter solar panel with its 450w rating it is only 15-16% and even less if the get slightly too warm. so ideal is 340mw and realistic is 204mw. us base d ginna nuclear reactor does 582mw. a barrel of oil is 1.7mw and the remaining reserves of the world are estimated to 1.57 trillion barrels. which comes out to 2.669x10^12w or 2669000000000w or 2669gw or 2669000mw. which is which is about 2000 times the raw solar constant for that area. it is about 7850 times the supposed efficiency claim for the solar panels and about 13000 times the actual efficiency. not factoring in loss through the wireless transfer as microwave radiation to the earth, the in system loss, the energy needed to keep it stationary the constant energy loss from having to replace panels thanks to degradation and shrapnel we need the solar constant to be about 8000 to 13000 times higher at whatever level the system will be stationed at than it would be on ground level. 8000 to times higher solar constant to make the claim true that it outputs more than all oil reserves on the planet. on ground level you could build like a single nuclear power plant and have 2-3 times as much energy as these panels would produce on the ground yet it would be 24/7. with 3k plants you would produce more than this claim and probably still be cheaper not even factoring in experimental reactor tech. this is a publicity stunt at best. even if it wasn't, the international community wouldn't allow it as you could use a microwave ray of such power as a weapon. i have yet to start about you would also have to receive that power.
Germany