20. the family expressed shock at the arrest, indicating no prior knowledge of radical behavior. 21. no corroborating evidence supports healthcare struggles, radicalization, or manifesto authorship. 22. the manifestos timing and post-crime emergence appear suspiciously aligned with constructing a convenient narrative. 23. mangiones interests in philosophy, history, and technology show no prior indication of grievances against the healthcare system. 24. alleged plan in the manifesto conflicts with mangiones understanding of the risks involved in leaving a trail of incriminating evidence. 25. manifestos timing and dissemination seem designed to align with public outrage rather than reflecting authentic premeditation. 26. lack of violent tendencies or any prior red flags in mangiones behavior contradict the extreme nature of the manifesto. 27. the anti-capitalist rhetoric in the manifesto is inconsistent with mangiones review of self-improvement and economic literature. 28. the sudden emergence of a violent and radical manifesto is inconsistent with mangiones well-documented online persona and personal history. 29. police did not focus on mangione as a suspect initially, yet the manifesto aligns too conveniently with the allegations against him. 30. friends and family emphasize mangiones non-violent and thoughtful demeanor, clashing with the manifestos tone and themes.
United States