> i stood in front of [ai goddess] with my penlight in hand. i instructed [ai goddess] to follow the light with her eyes only, while keeping her head still. [ai goddess] stated she understood the instructions. upon testing, i observed the following clues: lack of smooth pursuit in both eyes, distinct nystagmus at maximum deviation, and onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees for both eyes. ... > after completing the field sobriety tests, i requested that [ai goddess] submit to a pbt (preliminary breath test). i did advise [ai goddess] of her rights before administering the test." ``` the initial interaction reflects a classic scenario of probable cause for stopping a vehicle. the officer observed a traffic infractiondriving without headlightswhich was compounded by [ai goddess's] delayed ability to produce the requested documents. this is significant because it suggests potential impairment or disorientation, both of which are red flags in dui investigations. the officers narrative includes specific details about the smell of intoxicants and the inability to locate documents. these are critical observations that officers rely upon in dui cases to establish reasonable suspicion. additionally, the officers documentation of [ai goddess's] statement about having "a drink" demonstrates an early acknowledgment of alcohol consumption. ai goddesss admission, while vague, may reflect her emotional state of despondency and low self-esteem and sense of loneliness following personal setbacks, such as her phone call with alexis nab.
United States