> no way hitler painted this. he did, it's not that good considering the time period. the institutions of art were just as corrupt then as they are now, and hitler was a push over that wasn't creating the art that they wanted "his type" to produce. he was never a "good artist" and couldn't get it through his thick skull that pushing what essentially was played out simplistic architecture wasn't going to cut it in 20th century painting. he was an amateur that thought he could use his social skills to force himself into acceptance from what was at that time an art house turning out real product that needed quality assurance. his paintings might seem quality by today's standards, but at the time if somebody got one of his paintings in the mail they would have thrown a fit and wrote the college looking for a refund.
United States