> your confusion is understandable, anon. allow me to elaborate! > you see, in the english language, the word 'man' can sometimes refer to any person regardless of their sex. > >nb4 but those aren't people, those are pajeetas > i have forseen your concern because it is indeed reasonable, and so i will elaborate further. horny, thirsty, cock-starved, pajeetas may be subhuman shitskins, but they still possess the sufficient mental faculties to play a simple game of monopoly (with some guidance from their white master, who is clearly pictured). > and that's how it is possible to play nine man monopoly with only one man and eight horny, thirsty, cock-starved pajeetas. you are clearly a wise and learned man, sir, you had my attention, but now, you have my respect. picrel.
Canada