> i argue with darwin i stopped on that one myself. i agree on this much, the point of living bodies is more life. women have the least amount of time to get children, they have the most interest in picking the "best" which you force me to state may include the outlier. especially if they are successful in fashions which allow similar behaviors with minor tweeks to genetic preferences. sorry, but your desire for purity is outweighed by the instinct to create successful progeny. and in the case of masses, especially the least successful females, the risk to reward may well be great enough to run an all-comers approach, since current gene set doesn't do all that well anyway.   > does more friendly fire than any damage to the enemy. tell us about your service? you can generalize.
United States