this conclusion is based on the following: > deported workers must be replaced. > but welfare income is too competitive relative to job income, so some people sit at home all day and make free money instead of working. > therefore americans will not replace the deported workers. > employers therefore have to pay more to be competitive with welfare income. change one thing: > drastically cut welfare except for the very old and severely crippled. > now there is no welfare income to compete with job income. > now americans will do those jobs for the same wages as the deported workers. as usual, liberal solutions (welfare) leads to other problems (nonworkers). cut the welfare, and you get your workers back. why can't liberals figure out these simple things?
United States