to actually-remove/amend the 14th amendment, he'd have to amend the constitution which requires 2/3rds majority of both house and senate. they have the senate by like, a seat, and the house by 3-4 seats - they're never gonna get there. he has no hope of doing it by getting rid of the 14th amendment unilaterally, as he literally cannot do that without shitting on the process that has stood for almost 250 years.  best he could do is re-litigate it, they want to be going after the specific phrasing of "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." it just shows nobody knows what 'thereof' means anymore. it's like a reverse way of saying 'therefore' and hence in modern english that sentence in the 14th would read "all persons born or naturalized in the united states, and therefore subject to its jurisdiction, are citizens of the united states." i'm not saying it's impossible they can make a serious go at re-interpreting it, just that it's actually clearly written for its time and is just formal legalese today. also it's dangerous to re-interpret the constitution arbitrarily imo because it means a future president can argue "wellll they didn't really mean that with the 1st/2nd amendment" etc. what's there is there and it should be left the fuck alone imo unless there is an actual consensus in the whole us congress to change it, which is the way it's supposed to be.
Japan