zoroaster wasnt semitic, and claiming he was is pure cope. he was an indo-iranian prophet, not some desert wanderer, and his teachings came from the avestan culture, closely tied to sanskrit-speaking aryans, not semites. zoroastrianisms dualism and monotheistic leanings influenced judaism, christianity, and islam, not the other way around. and no, hinduism isnt the closest thing to zoroastrianism eitherits a cousin, not a clone, evolving its own path with polytheism and dharma systems. trying to rewrite zoroasters identity as semitic is just more historical revisionism, the kind of cultural theft that the abrahamic world specializes in.
United Kingdom