*hordes.   greenland is a country with a tiny population & is insanely weak militarily, but denmark is barely better on those points. furthermore, denmark has not fulfilled its most basic obligations to nato due to general extreme societal corruption, decay, irresponsibility, and incompetence. in denmark's defense, it did give a lot of money and relative participation in places like iraq and afghanistan, and donated a lot to ukraine (though all this could count against denmark as well). denmark, like the usa, is thoroughly jewish, and there's fewer and fewer left of the original danes, a hidden eradication has been going on for many decades, similar to much of europe in different ages. the usa will take greenland if it chooses to, greenland is simply too important for the usa in regards to geostrategy and security. the usa already has one or more bases in greenland, and should even within the current political climate have an easy time getting more bases if they wanted to. the danish government would be foolish to not help the usa get more bases in greenland if the usa wanted to. there are probably also us soldiers in denmark itself. denmark has had a complex relationship with greenland, the people in power in denmark the last 70 years has sometimes been extremely hostile to the people of greenland, like covert prevention of fertility, but european countries have also been targeted with lots of prevention of fertility the last many decades. from a point of view of greenland, i would never trust denmark, the usa, europe, canada. that leaves russia, but greenland should never, ever ally with russia, the usa will conquer greenland if that happens. if greenland goes for independence, and then are forced to become part of the usa, greenland should try to get as many clauses that enables them to become independent again as they can. but this may first off be removed, the usa can be amazing at negotiations, and the usa may decide to break agreements.
Denmark