> no, that's not ad hominem. i did not claim that your argument was false because you are not a swede just gonna cite wikipedia for this one. > "this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. this avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent's character or background" > no, there is a clear causality faggot. no, there's correlation. but correlation =/= casuality. > "its not a fallacy if i use a qustion mark" lmao get the fuck out of here you dishonest bitch. your brain functions no different than a jew. the same dishonest, slimey conduct
Sweden