all you did was point to the same claim that those 4 sources describe jesus in a particular way, it should be childs play to grab the exact quote from the exact manuscript so that we can read it ourselves rather than: trust me bro. first source: the letter of lentulus (/lntjls/) is an epistle of mysterious origin that was first widely published in italy in the fifteenth century. it purports to be written by a roman official, contemporary of jesus, and gives a physical and personal description of jesus. the letter may have influenced how jesus was later physically depicted in art.  second source: the archko volume or archko library[1] is a 19th-century volume containing what purports to be a series of reports from jewish and pagan sources contemporary with jesus that relate to the biblical texts describing his life. the work went through a number of versions and has remained in print ever since. the texts are otherwise unknown, and the author was convicted by an ecclesiastical court of falsehood and plagiarism.[2]
United Kingdom