> remember, it only takes a single juror to nullify all charges no. one dissenting juror doesn't "nullify charges" or mean he would go free. you need an unanimous verdict either way. if there was even the suggestion of jury nullification or one or more jurors refusing to go along with a guilty conviction, he would immediately request a mistrial, which just means starting over with a new jury. that's why jury nullification isn't really a thing, and barely more legally relevant than all of the sovereign citizen nonsense. you would have to have a whole jury, all 12 people deciding to ignore all of the proof of guilt and vote not guilty. that's why it almost never even happens even in cases where the law that was violated was clearly unjust. and in this case, no one thinks that the laws prohibiting cold blooded murder are unjust laws.  > who haven't been fucked over by a medical insurance company getting fucked over by an insurance company sucks, but no normal, sane person thinks that it justifies murdering people.
United States