at risk of arguing socialist should be more properly socialist (which, i don't actually care i'm not socialist, but i like arguing): when i mention in some of my longposts, especially this one    , that they are not actually adhering to left theory when they mock le young men or downward mobility, any usage of the term "failson" applicable or not, i'm not just making it up. i have seen ostensible socialists make great appeals to capitalist values to judge their opponents. that is never convincing to anyone you haven't already sold to, and also just proves you're a fraud to anyone that isn't proud to be one i have seen more demands for aristocratic (sorry, "technocratic" like meritocracy is real and matters) reverence from our supposed socialists than any self-proclaimed monarchist. it is even more hollow coming from temporarily embarrassed milliona- sorry, marquesse- sorry, "leading experts" and their journalistic entourages. much like our pseud basedlords on the eright have a billion excuses for why they aren't doing esoteric or how doing nothing and losing is all part of the accelerationist plan, these types have just as many excuses for how they can still be socialist while participating in, benefiting from, enforcing, and rejoicing in capitalism. there's always a heavenly excuse for murder i'm a right-winger, i think all socialism is always a lie everywhere it preaches itself. but i do not always have to take that assumption on faith when i can simply demonstrate it by its own
United States