> threat that russia demands they be neutral? my current theory is that putin was bored, and over the last 20+ years the gas station attendant never did anything (really) to improve the lives of everyday russians, and in the future putin could see trouble with this, and in a mafia government there's always someone who wants what you got, so what could of a better choice from the delay your own ousting than a distraction, "war"! this whole idea of keeping coutries that surround russia "neutral" is a joke, since the eu is a economic organization, and nato is defensive one, defence from who? russia, but it didn't have to be this way,  what putin or other kikes in the kremlin really mean by saying they want their neighbours to be neutral, is "neutral to invade or just control for a-far with puppet goverments, you see russia, has core or part of russian society has never really given up is sense of empire "as if being bigger somehow helps" when thoughout the history of russia over last 120 years, this hasn't happend,  russia will never improve it's situation until it improves it's internal problems, rather than external ones, and over the 25 years from the bright but shaky times of the 90's russia has actually gone backwards with putin and the kremlin kikes    42l6jbee i like the hollywood version of animal farm where the farm animals kill all the pigs   x9tdnzy4 on and btw ukraine wasn't prefect, it still isn't but over the last 30 years with a shaky future/past and sense of actual freedom in ukraine you can compare and contrast, between russia and ukraine what russia could of been without the mafia government and bunch of rar rar cheerleaders  > the kremlin knows it has already lost. 23-12-2024, ukraine will never be under its control. without ukraine, the revival of a new ussr is economically unfeasible. dugin hd
Anarchist