> second it was regarding following the golden rule at all times. so your claim is only the golden rule is adaptable, not every universal rule? strange because the comment i responded to sounded a lot more general. > you have already given up all attempts at debating honestly. holding your own words against you is dishonesty? you're the one who's strawmanning my position, who brings up an ominous rule about "killing is bad" who he obviously thinks himself that it is neither timeless nor universal and of which i never claimed the opposite yet you want to play games coercing me into taking up this position.  > actions speak much louder than hollow words. indeed and your actions show you've come to this battle of wits unarmed.
Germany