> refuse to admit anon was not right because i don't think he's wrong, faggot! he's on the right track, and my objective was to put him at the right destination. my argument is that right track, and you refuse to engage with or even acknowledge the existence of my argument.  are you a robot? do you think in binary? or that people only ever say literally exactly what they mean, or that they should? that there is never anything between the lines?  and that you don't have a responsibility to connect dots and comprehend things yourself? i still maintain that if our roles were reversed, i would have put these inferences together in less than a second. wouldn't even be worth making a post over.  why couldn't you figure it out?  that's the important question here.
United States