> a justification for the existence of transcendental categories like truth, logic, reason why would they (or god) require "justification"? and of course it's still appropriate to question the existence of these things. truth, for instance, while it almost always exists, is never real. well possible god works the same way. > there is a manifest god > but not as a physical thing rather it's a question of how or why they work; their mere existence is irrelevant, just like gods mere existence would be irrelevant, if he didn't do anything. and conversely: if it does something it probably also does "exist" in some form. and in any case nobody ascribes any unusual abilities or functions to truth, logic or reason, although reason is a bit vague. very vague. > unless it's the causality one
Germany