> internet as a whole already has regulations but it should have less, way less, ideally none. > you cannot distribute child pornography or threat anyone both child pornography and threats (that is actual threats) are rights violations. you do not need additional internet regulations to prosecute them. > just add pornography to it :), it's very simple. but it's not. if a woman has voluntarily decided to sell pictures of her body to a magazine for instance, no rights have been violated, therefore there's no justification for state intervention.
Australia