see   but this other mutt has the solution wrong. you can never defeat pilpul through argumentation. here's the right answer, to op: you're a duplicitous scumbag. all the shit you typed out is just a longwinded way of saying that ian was correct, you're just writing out long dumb paragraphs nobody will read to try to disprove little pieces of it around the edges. the core thrust remains, and if you could argue it away, you would, but you don't, instead you engage in pilpul like the conniving scum you are. you argue like a russian: > accused of x > response: y is nonsense and a distraction from z print out all your dumb fake irrelevant gibberish, roll it up tightly, and shove it up your ass.
United States