we're just going to assume that there's an objective moral truth? the game is rigged (to fail) from the start. it's assumptions like these that leave us open to contradictions like the one on which this thread is built: it seems "wrong", yet we can't actually *explain why without resorting to arbitrary notions. the contradiction is resolved immediately if we stop trying to universalize morality as objective truth and instead recognize the contingent and highly subjective nature of morality. then, we realize that while you're disgusted by dog dick, beccah is a practitioner of the bestial arts and sees nothing wrong with it, which creates sides: the goal is then not to "prove" which side is right and which is wrong, but to rally those who agree with your views against beccah and her simplords and show that bitch why she should switch to being a human fleshlight instead - she has no choice. that's what your ancestors did, pussy.   what you're describing is instinct, not "self-evident" moral truth. most of us have an instinctive disgust for beastialty. that said, i'm all for making moral assertions, but i'd like it if we could stop pretending that those are rooted in some cosmically-ordained moral law and start empowering ourselves to recognize that we are the arbiters of morality - every last one of us, because it is we who form moral opinions and not the universe itself. and if i have to hear to someone rely on god or a "soul" again, i'm going to dedicate my life to starting a deicidal cult and murder every single "god" you pig-faced morons want to shove down my throat. imagine: god and devil laying as corpses on a mound of rottong idols - a victorious cult gathered round with bloodied knives in hand... beccah weeping as her dog is fed to chang.
United States