> which is still a step above just "promising without a plan". so you prefer being lied to with confidence by someone projecting a facade of competence, rather than be told something more fundamental to the job of president without fake promises. i'm glad you're still voting georgescu, but this is still midwittery man. no wonder we got memed by so many pseuds for the last 30 years, from iliescu onwards there's too much of a preference for "muh substantial effective plan". > so basically let's waste 2-3 years before anything tangible can happen regarding his plans and then vooote again for good measure? i'd expect it'd happen in more like 6 months, but what do you see as the alternative? these terms like "wasting 2-3 years before anything tangible can happen", these sorts of lines of argument have the implication there's something magical he can do to avoid that. or would you prefer he stages a self-coup the moment he's in office? i'd doubt that, given that you don't like the international attention. i've been here since like 2016, waiting 2-3 years for proper policies to begin being put in place is not a big deal for me. > what stops them ngo funded parties from pretending to be "le nationalist" in the next elections just to trick the stupid goys ?  simple. the iron guardist cat is out of the bag, and foreign ngos want to put it down. they've given up all pretenses and started calling all nationalists extremists. my assertion is simple - romanians figured out we can vote 'extremists', and the sort of candidates we want promote rhetoric that is too radical even for ngo puppets to promote. why won't they ever promote such rhetoric? because they are trying to play the long game, and playing along will only legitimize far-right nationalist thought further. even what is happening now is reversing that trend of western brainwashing. they won't try to feed more into it, it'd be disastrous for them at this point.
Romania