> this is absolute nonsense. well, if you say so lmao. but you don't know shit about internal workings of ussr. nobody on this shithole board knows shit about internal workers of ussr. > they didn't have anti homosexuality laws because the whole country was going through a reformation. the fuck is that drivel lmao. early ussr, think 20s, had shit that made weimar republic look like american puritan neighborhood. it didn't need any reformation, all the important projects, such as killing all educated population, were executed right away. this period of history is just well-obscured and not talked about, because it contains important clues to what ussr even was. > everything else you said is made up lies. i suggest you look up a testimony by a man named karl heinzen about how they were drinking with marx, and marx has lured him into his flat. just try not to piss yourself with laughter. i think it's a perfect showcase of this character, it will probably be studied in school once socialism is exposed for what it is. engels was an obvious homo just by his biography. rich, strong and tall, high social status business man, never married, in 19th fucking century. nuff said. things are more complicated with stalin, however, clues are just too many to ignore. voroshilov was a complete worthless retard, and somehow stalin was putting him in highly important position for his entire life. it can't be explained in any other way. there are also weird lapses in interrogations of purged soviet system members. it's as if people interrogating them were steering clear of the homo question, as if in fear to unravel the entire system and implicate wrong people. ussr top brass was full of mutants and freaks, who else would run such a structure. oh, and there was the moon-butted peach incedent. we don't talk about it. i'm not sure if puny power level of pol dot com posters would be able to process the implications.
Russian Federation