correct. a proper analysis of the election requires you to identify groups who shifted from trump to harris. the only plausible angle (which i do not think is actually plausible) is a massive swing by women. this misses the key important fact that women are not actually rabidly pro-abortion outside of a small minority (mostly people who have had abortions). people who know women and have known women in their lives are aware of this. the proper way to survey this question is not how it is done by the jew press. the real question is to ask a woman if she herself would have an abortion. that is when you see what they really think. they may not oppose the right nor wish to see it restricted but their personal feeling will prevent them from becoming "pro abortion" which is what the democrats are banking on.  the harris campaign is the least competent in my lifetime. it's worse than john kerry, who was intentionally losing.
United States