at least i'm not pretending what the problem is. at one level, government shouldn't be involved with housing and regulations at all. why should they be? building shelter for survival is a natural law. individuals, communities, and or private entities can do it fine without the need of government intervention.  on the other hand, one of the only functions a government should have is to preserve the basic safety and security of its people. if your country, as a community - forget legislative function, can't even ensure that you're housed, then you have a failed government/country which is using and taking advantage of you. where's your say in anything? why should anyone support a country when they can't even have a home? they should be revolting or moving to and supporting a country where they can at least have a home.  and the problem isn't money, or resources, at all, but it's an entrenched system that works against people. it's overregulation and over reach, like the corrupt group in north carolina which went against the amish built homes after the recent disaster. it's forcing people into $400,000 mc mansions and 40 year mortgages, when plenty of people would even be happy with a $15,000 shack. it's trying to milk people for 100k for a tiny home that cost that 15k in materials. it's an entire network of corrupt builders, suppliers, land owners, people in taxation, real estate agents, and so on type of people who want to make 2x double profit or more on every endeavor they undertake, and who want to live for free on the backs of others while providing nothing of real value in return. i have no ethical issues with slaves killing their masters.
United States