> if you were to repeal the 19th amendment > states rights > argue the issue of suffrage should be left to individual states to decide, emphasize a more decentralized approach to governance. > originalist interpretation > take an originalist interpretation of the constitution, suggest the founding fathers did not explicitly intend for womens suffrage; a constitutional interpretation should adhere to the original understanding. > legal process arguments > emphasize that the amendment process itself allows for changes; if there is a broad consensus to repeal the 19th amendment, it could be done through constitutional means. > concerns about overreach > express concerns that expanding voting rights without a thorough understanding of the potential consequences lead to unintended societal changes; argue for a reassessment of the impact of the 19th amendment. > public opinion > highlight that public opinion has evolved over time, and repealing the 19th amendment reflects the will of a significant portion of the population. > framing as a constitutional experiment > present the idea that the 19th amendment was an experiment in constitutional governance; suggest its legitimate to revisit such experiments if they do not align with the envisioned societal order. > raise questions of potential flaws or imbalances in the original ratification of the 19th amendment that should be reevaluated > acknowledge that special interest groups, particularly those advocating for womens rights, had an outsized influence on the ratification process, overshadowing broader public sentiment.   pealing-the-19th-amendment
United Kingdom