> it's relevant as a statistics. ah, statistics. to quote the great american author twain: lies, damned lies, and statistics > so it stands to reason the proportion of western supplies was greater than in the end  but my first reply to you was a table showing that lend lease only started arriving in meaningful numbers after 1943? and even after that, it was only a small drop of total soviet manufacturing. to anyone objective, your argument sounds like a clear cope.  your countrymen contemporaries agree (picrel). how sad it is to see that the once great french intellect was brainrotted by hollywood, leading to small minded specimens such as yourself. > even if we don't talk about the war, the soviet union was basically built by westerners lol: russia buying some american machinery to kickstart it's industrialization efforts (which brought it from a backwards agricultural shithole to the status of the most advanced nation on earth) means "the ussr was built by westerners"? what a pitiful cope.
Bosnia and Herzegovina