> can you give examples where an incorrect understanding of cross-subsidization leads to incorrect actions in solving real problems? > the spread of the myth that the rise in the cost of electricity is associated with subsidies by industry to the population has an impact on the behavior of industrial consumers. > industrial consumers vote with their feet for the rising cost of electricity in the centralized power supply system - they massively build their own generation, which partially or completely covers their own consumption. at the same time, consumers are not disconnected from the centralized power supply system. the centralized power supply system is used in this case to back up emergency situations associated with its own generation. the electricity legislation does not contain a system for paying for the reservation of network infrastructure and generating capacities if there is no flow of electricity from the external network. thus, reservation services are free. > as a result of consumers leaving, the costs of maintaining the ues of russia are transferred to the remaining consumers. the departure of some consumers creates a spiral of economic incentives for others to build their own generation. the process of destruction of the ues of russia is starting. > thus, it is necessary to resolve the issues of forming fees for reserving the power of electrical networks for consumers whose electricity supply is partially or fully provided from their own generation, but who are connected to the unified energy system of russia. taking into account the category of reliability of power supply to consumers is a solution to this issue. self-generation can be considered as one of two (three) independent sources. an additional independent source is the ues of russia. 6/?
Czech Republic