everyone in this thread is a complete fucking retard. here's a flawless argument: if god existed, he would be willing to end all suffering. if god existed, he would be able to end all suffering. therefore, if god existed, suffering wouldn't exist. there is suffering. therefore, there is no god. > but muh suffering is good no. suffering is bad. buddha was smarter than you and so am i. do you want to stab your eyes out right now? didn't think so. technically you can take away one of the components (willing/able to end all suffering) and have an entity like that exist. for example if i could end all suffering in reality with the push of a button i would (i am willing but not able, making me better than your imagined god). on the other hand, if i was able to end all suffering but not willing i'd be a piece of shit (chris langan's god)
United States