cons: the so-called "free press" is not free, but owned by a small group of corporations. granting them white house access only reinforces their position of oligopoly. they are also no longer relevant, having been caught in too many lies to regain public credibility and their influence has waned to the point that a talking thumb who shares dmt anecdotes has more influence. talking to them is a waste of time and resources. pros: teh lulz
United Kingdom