> with negative causality, nothing doesn't need to do anything for something to happen. the idea of "negative causality" is illogical, stupid. causality (aka cause and effect) is the scientific concept that for a thing to move from one state of being into another state of being, which is an effect, there must be a cause, which is outside (external) to the thing. dry wood catches fire when a match is set to it, dry wood does not, cannot, combust spontaneously. to propose that nothing causes an effect, or that an effect happens without a cause, breaks the law of cause and effect, it renders the proposer stupid and ignorant. to propose "negative causality", whatever the hell that means, is to deny the law of cause and effect exist, to deny science, it renders the proposer stupid and ignorant.
Australia