is there a reason the judge isn't under investigation in ny? the entire thing is obviously intentional railroad and intentionally contrary to spirit of the law. > but in letter only if you pretend that secondary charges are supposed to be single charge when there is no other primary felony.  > a person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof. > falsifying business records in the first degree is a class e felony. > a person is guilty of falsifying business records in the second degree when, with intent to defraud, he: > 1.makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an enterprise; or > 2.alters, erases, obliterates, deletes, removes or destroys a true entry in the business records of an enterprise; or > 3.omits to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which he knows to be imposed upon him by law or by the nature of his position; or > 4.prevents the making of a true entry or causes the omission thereof in the business records of an enterprise. falsifying business records in the second degree is a class a misdemeanor. notice, to be a felon, there has to be a crime. that was never established, the judge wrote that since there were multiple pieces of documentation which carried the evidence of an entry, the creation of the evidence and record of entry, in each part, was a crime in and of itself, and the fact that trump has an internal filing system is evidence of an intent to commit a felony. so basically, if trump expenses weren't part of a business, there would have been no crime. > being in business makes you a criminal.
United States