> the amount of long-range missiles being sent to ukraine is low in quantity, a couple dozen per month, with restrictions that ukraine cannot strike any of russia hohol media claims that the west is restricting long range missile usage because they're afraid of escalations, but if you really pay attention to this sentence the real reason is clear as day. if they receive a couple dozen long-range missiles per month, then why don't we hear about at least a dozen of successful strikes inside former ukrainian land?  it's because pretty much everything gets shot down. sure every once in a while they manage to hit a oil refinery or ammo depot or convoy, and shills love it and use it as shitposting material for a whole week but 80~90% of western missiles hit nothing. it'd take natos entire arsenal to do significant damage to russia and then nato will be left with nothing, totally open to attack not just from russia, but the entire axis of chuds(china, iran, best korea, yemen, etc).
Japan