the main anger against your health care system is how absurdly overpriced the treatments are, right? in my opinion, they are on top also toxic and/or simply have cheaper and/or better alternatives, that aren't pursued, but that might not be as much of a mainstream perception. none of these issues are at the hand of some ceo at a health ensurance. these problems exist in similar fashion in all of the countries that have a modern health care system that works with established big pharma. wether there's certain bigger intentions behind it or not, big pharma buys into universities, health care facilities and legislation. the health care ensurance business can merely calculate with the given options as best as it can, and it's not going to be a consumer satisfying end product if the preexisting conditions simply are so shitty that the market doesn't allow a very favourable equation to be used for approving / disapproving certain practices that may or may not be overpriced and/or malpractice. luigi is clearly unloading on the wrong guy here in my opinion.
Germany