"climate" models require substituting and eliminating the solar input in order to create a fictional chasm of temperature that must therefore be "explained". it's not even incorrect or exaggeration it's literally a fictional scam to get people okay with the idea of violence against them, such as taxes/restrictions on meat (enforced weakness and infertility) even though large hordes of ruminant animals demonstrably regenerate the soil of plant agriculture heavy societies.  coincidentally, there happens to be a measurable, exact temperature difference that is mistakenly created between the climate "as measured" and the "solar input". this solar input being the false value which is created by taking the actual solar input and reducing it a dimension, which mathematically has the effect of acting as if the earth is a 2d plane where the sun hits it all times in the same place - which it obviously doesn't. this is in all climate models and textbooks, but taken as gospel. the "error" is as simple as measuring the surface temperature rather than accounting for the adiabatic lapse rate at the actual atmospheric mid-point. this deliberate error creates 33 degrees. i'm sure it's just a coincidence though. that 33 degrees happens to be the exact quantity used in a tool of deception to hoodwink and control the unenlightened.
United Kingdom