who do you hope to covince with your abrasive approach? in any case, i made no contradiction in my previous post. do you not see not the internal inconsistency in your own principle of "freedom to leave me alone"? if you have such freedom, then surely i do as well. but i may not wish to leave you alone, and so by your principle--not mine--you should leave me alone to not leave you alone. and you failed to address my inquiry as to why you should have the ability to say "no" without the threat of force or violence.
United States