i saw commentary comparing san francisco with houston. houston is ugly and sprawling, with very little regulation around development. sf is a beautiful city, with lots of city planners and regulation. the thing is, houston is growing rapidly because people can actually have families and live a decent life there. sf is wonderful, but its a wonderland for wealthy people. normal people cannot afford to raise a family. you get either very rich people, or very poor who rely on the government to live. its like two completely different visions of the future.
Canada