> those countries wouldn't be hostile if russia weren't retarded. they're only hostile because their governments were "bought off". the split in ukraine for that matter is all about money. the jewish ukrainian oligarchs that helped stage the coup and funded right sector and azov nazis, don't give a fuck about the fake ass holodomor. they only care about money. they were essentially offered billions by the west to fight a war against russia. which is why we give money to ukraine and don't even ask where it goes even though everyone knows ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries in the entire world. > hitler's push to the east probably would have happened either way, he did feel very strongly about lebensraum for some weird reason what is so fucking hard to understand? europe has no resources. why do you think europe is completely fucking powerless? the soviet union was inevitably going to become more and more powerful with time. the only thing that "saved" europe was that it was occupied by the united states. > if the soviets acted smarter, i think they'd have gotten away much better. a well timed attack against a german army still consolidating in poland puts them in the advantage and builds sympathies for the future. hitler wasn't a retard. without the molotov-ribbentrop pact, he wouldn't have invaded poland. but had hitler not invaded poland, the commies likely would have come to power in germany, and all of europe would have fallen. > this guy also thought watergrate was a smart idea. nixon had nothing to do with watergate, retard.
United States