> the origin doesnt matter, we would always have to arbitrarily pick something. it is if you want to replicate it across distance. > the point is that both systems derive from this very same convention that is false. the imperial system actually harps back to the troy ounce which was only abandoned because we bred to many different types with slight variances in weight. > but imperial is derived from the way metric portions the original reference in a particular way no. you can define the entire imperial system without using metric or constants. the claim of imperial being defined by metric is nonsense based on a tethering. niggers just arbitrarily took "an inch" in complete disregard for how average measurements actually work.
Germany