this board is clueless about eugenics  if you look at the ideal faces for a man or woman, you will see that the female face has: > properly forward grown face > properly defined chin > compact midface > protruding low set supraorbitals > high set cheekbones but somehow, according to /pol/, the more recessed a girl is, the higher her attractiveness becomes. but that is obviously not true and the best looking women in history like diane kruger for example, they all have good facial bone structures. then you ask people to rate them and you get reponses like " muh she looks like a tranny". i can't stop laughing at this level of delusion. irl, the closer a girl looks to someone like diane, the better looking she is. in short women who have, a strong chin, compact midface, defined jaw, and hunter eyes, are very highly desired and anyone who thinks otherwise is a coping subhuman. even chads cannot get women like picrel simply because they are at the absolute top of the dating chain. most men dont even meet women like this for that matter.
Nazi