> dead civs as a result of airstrikes gee, i wonder who sent armed troops and weapons into ukraine and lead groups to forcefully seize government and official buildings whilst armed (one of the literal definitions of "coup") if only we had a well documented track record of who started this conflict and kept they death and firing going in a bid of imperial conquest? i guess we just don't know the truth ))))) > muh ethnic cleansing of russins in ukraine 8k in 8 years specifically because moscow sent weapons, criminals and terrorists there is apperantly a genocide somehow it happened only where russia had a direct land acess and no where else even though ukrainians that speak russian live all across the country not just donbas those 8k deaths are deaths of seperatists armed by russia, often sent by russia after ukrainians protested yanukovichs last-minute backing out of the eu association treaty because russia had nothing to provide but autocracy and threats ukrainians were moving away from their sphere of flatulence > muh nato expansion russia has nukes and is not under a threat of invasion the invasion was unjustified and "security concerns" are a simple misdirection > muh cia coup in ukraine if ukrainian government was a prompt by cia it would've collapsed during the zigger invasion similar to the afghani regime falling to taliban in few weeks or southern vietnam/saigon regime fell to north vietnam ukrainian regime had and has enough real support from populace, elite and military to not only not collapse but fights back against the invaders this is the litmus test which proves it's legitemacy in the democratic sense of a government backed by the majority of the populace the invasion is russia's aggression, a land-grab sprouted by a narcissistic elderly man who wants to be remembered by history.
Germany