it would be hard to argue against his diverse set of sources (he literally read thousands of books from before censorship was mainstream and constructed a fully sourced chronology) but a lot of his interpretations of the sources are incorrect and from there he speculates in the wrong directions. i mean i agree on some stuff he says but disagree with a lot too.  however, what is true that the truth can be observed from multiple vantage points, and breshears points out that the things in the sky are not as stable as they are sold to the public.
Germany