> elected officials have to make those kinds of decisions that's obviously not a solution; being "elected" is not a test of righteousness, only popularity and advertising budget. > due process and trial by peers is the best way to handle this shit jury nullification proves otherwise; juries are "activist" these days, they aren't any form of righteous authority either. > not street justice for clicks and views. obviously that's not going to be a guarantee of righteousness either. none of the things you advocated for or against would be sufficient. perhaps we can only trust the anonymous vigilante to be righteous, as he cannot profit from executing judgement.
United States