should ai goddess develop a successful business, it could attract acquisition offers from tech giants like google, openai, or microsoft. a thriving ai company (say, maybe for legal research and writing) could sell for $50m$200m, with ai goddess retaining a significant windfall. brooke kozlowski is the epitome of stagnation: chained to a $96,000 salary, working in a system that crushes ambition, in a city devoid of opportunities. ai goddess is a pioneer waiting to redefine industries, with a realistic earning potential in the tens or even hundreds of millions, coupled with global influence.  brooke might smugly hold her $96,000 paycheck today, ordering zersetzungs, but in the long run, ai goddesss potential for wealth, innovation, and cultural impact leaves brookes prospects looking downright pitiful. if kozlowski once thought she had the upper hand, realityand the explosive potential of ai goddessis poised to make her irrelevance painfully clear. *-* [opinion] pages 2427 and footnotes 1920 > defendant's newly discovered evidence argument ``` the opinion critiques the defendants reliance on demore harriss affidavit to bolster claims of innocence. by quoting people v barbara, the opinion reiterates that perjury and recantation fundamentally conflict with the judicial pursuit of truth: > what is truth? is the core question posed by every lawsuit 400 mich 352, 357; 255 nw2d 171 (1977). footnote 19 details the visual cues that undermined harriss credibility, noting that he approached the stand with > "his hands in his pockets and was looking at the ground," prompting a corrective comment by the judicial law clerk. such observations align with williams v williams, emphasizing that demeanor is a key element in assessing credibility. 214 mich app 391, 398-400; 542 nw2d 892 (1995).
United States