> the idea is stupid, but the atheists have tried to prove that it's not just an idea. it's an observable thing that actually happens. most cringe atheists don't know about it. mutations aren't random. > if it is intelligent, that in and of itself proves the existence of a purpose and design, which has to exist outside the organism that is "evolving", which proves evolutionism (accidental, random, disorder, chaos) false, and instead proves intelligent design. yeah, sorta. it undermines the atheist's nihilistic "just-happened-randomly-for-no-reas on" narrative but it also undermines the idea of some universal architect designing all the animals as they are. nature seems to embody a kind of intelligence but its "design method" is a dynamic process. it doesn't disprove there being a god but it renders moot the creation myth.
Moldova