this actually does get at a central paradoxical issue. i think the more spiritually, emotionally, intellectually, etc., developed a man is the more he has an impulse to want to lift up his counterpart to the greater levels of being he has experienced, and this is why what you propose seems humorous and unsatisfying. abundance of dumb semi-sentient but perfectly nice and devoted wives would stave off the roastie-pocalypse but the more developed you are as a man, the less satisfying it would be for you. it's in our nature i think. just as a well developed man naturally tries to lift up his friends to new heights, he has the same impulse towards a woman. i actually have great sympathy for the feminist fairy tale of egalitarian living between mates as equals, it's just that at this point it's beyond proven that it simply can't work that way. i would have more to say about this but i'm tired of typing for now. merry christmas anon.   that doesn't even make sense anon please use your brain. yes women are extreme addict fiends for attention. no, making a thread on /pol/ discussing the actual depth of the problem does not somehow encourage women to be worse. and also, no the best action isn't just to ignore, though that's a good move. the best corrective action is to be incredibly attractive and visible to women while openly proclaiming your opinion that they're all shit and none of them are even close to being good enough for you. it's also fun.
United States