> this retarded meme doesn't apply to historical events of course you'd think that lmfao > if you want to be a schizo you can say ww2 never happened at all and the burden of proof is on everyone else to provide evidence yes, and there is sufficient evidence to prove that world war ii, did in fact, happen. i know this is gonna blow your jewish mind, but saying "burden of proof" isn't some magical spell to ward off anything and everything like you think it is, it's simply asking you to provide evidence of your claim. anti-semitic, i know.  > you agree nazis rounded up these millions of jews, you agree some where used for forced labor, you even "concede" that some of those died from disease and starvation, all of this you got from mainstream historical understanding  yes, because there's evidence to suggest that those things happened. just because x is true and y is true doesn't automatically mean that z is true. > but you draw the line on even discussing what the nazis would have done with the rest i don't know what you're trying to get across here. what do you mean "with the rest"? you seem to be making some stupid presuppositions here. i'm guessing you think that since i'm making the argument that 6 million jews weren't killed in the holocaust, that i have to account for however many of those 6 million weren't actually killed, and i have to explain where they ended up. but this is presupposing that that 6 million figure is accurate or factual in any way. and i already went over this with you. i know this drives your little kike mind insane, because actually defending your position is anathema to you, and the only way you know to argue is to use pilpul to distract from the point of contention and to ceaselessly attack your opponent. but i don't have to give you shit. my position is simply that i don't believe your position to be factual or accurate. you're the one who has to prove that 6 million jews were systematically exterminated in the holocaust.
United States