he won on appeal and the obscure law used to convict him was struck down as unconstitutional. the problem with all laws trying to curb anything more clean cut than "must be 18 or older to watch or perform" runs into the problem of who decides what is vulgar? what is obscene? when does an innocent picture of a mother bathing her new born turn into porn of an infant? if you can't define the line in black and white, completely unambiguous and not open to arguments, it's not going to stand up in court.
United States