> i want to see him actually do stuff but his speech is definitely not the main reason i'm voting for him. ok, but it seems really silly to me that you find it as a reason you wouldn't vote for him. you're prioritizing something that was forced into political rhetoric for the benefit of ngo slop. people with ngo and think tank support will always have more of a 'program' in place, simply because there's money behind them, and the correlation between having that program and actually being competent is frankly minuscule. it shouldn't matter at all. > not really, i'm just tired of hearing only this side every election and then get scammed even more. then why are you arguing he should be participating in the damn scam? > it's bullshit because he knows psd will not allow him but he still says it like he will be the one in control of everything. that's sort of reasonable, but like i said, there's good reason to believe it will eventually be that way if things go to plan. i don't see why he should publicly admit to any such plan in advance just to give more ammo to his rivals, though. > if psd were smart they would play his patriotic games just to save image and perhaps get another majority in 5 years, but i don't expect them to get it. they got their orders from their foreign handlers that this is too far and won't. you don't seem to get it that this is the zog in romania panicking. you mentioned "parties that pretend to be patriotic" as a future thing but it's a thing of the past. that's what psd used to be like, or even the natlibs, but the ship has sailed. > everything is calculated speculation ... look, i get being blackpilled on politics, but i am not sure what you really even want out of someone to believe him to be genuine. if you believe that, by principle, no politician is ever genuine, then what's the point of calling out georgescu specifically on it? i also don't subscribe to accelerationist ideas, desu. let's keep romania from becoming like the west
Romania