> already explained. profit, simply defined as making more than you invest. you cannot wrap your mind around basic bitch mathematical concepts or fundamental logical axioms. like that you can't have something from nothing, such as profit. it has to come from somewhere. you just repeat your assertions like a some catholic mindlessly recites a prayer. > state interference with market, causes inflation. money supply expansion causes inflation. > as such expands, 'profits' must also. yes, it is true that profits must rise, on an absolute scale, as the currency is being debased. but the currency is being debased to enable profits. > ergo, the problem is not profit yes it is. > but state interference. literal cultist. > again -its entirely possible to have profit, without inflation it isn't. you just obstinately pretend otherwise > again -my position is that you dont need to inexorably increase the money supply to profit. your position is wrong. your position is an arbitrary assertion which rejects basic fundamental logic and reason. > you need to increase cost, in order to keep up with inflating the money supply. the money supply grows because the money for the profits has to be constantly printed. and the more you print, the faster you need to print more just to prevent the amount you are printing from becoming negligible compared to the total money supply. > if there werent state intervention, ie, no inflation, the state doesn't produce inflation. fiat currency creation produces inflation. fiat currency creation occurs whenever banks "lend" or someone pays for something with a line of credit or a credit card. that someone need not and isn't only and solely the state. > this is a faculty of the state. not of capitalism you are retarded. 1. most fiat currency isn't even printed. it's fictional cash and coins. 2. governments borrows and taxes, doesn't print. 3. banks create money by pretending to lend existing fiat currency but really creating more of it in the process.
Romania