> attack canada for oil if the us used its full domestic oil production for war, you wouldn't need imports > military on reactionary side no. the spic and nigger mercenaries that comprise the military are loyal to the un, not the muttistani people. even the white ones are hollow skulled gymcucks that don't know the difference between killing an infant and killing an enemy combatant. > ukraine russia goes full hog, likely involving belarus, and mops up the hohols > europe copes and seethes about ukraine, but deploys its forces to assist the us military and other revolutionary forces. > 100 million gun owners not all are reactionary, many are communists or libcucks assuming 60 million are able to fight, that still gives a larger force than anything the world could throw at us, realistically. now factor in easily seized targets from the outset of the conflict (ng bases, artillery stockpiles, as airfields, etc.) and you have the reactionaries not able to destroy dc and the tyrants that be, but very much able to maintain their independence. the major cities of almost every state can be easily quarantined or sieged into submission (detroit being a great example), though this will likely cause (thank fuck) a total race war. people meme about drones and tanks as opposition, but the reality is that these can be combatted with mass infantry waves, clever tactics, and again i cannot stress enough, the god of war, artillery. outside of initial organisation, the primary goal must be the seizure of undersecured local garrisons and the seizure of their ordinance. key to the coming conflict will also be skirmishing tactics, the american jaeger will remind the world the shotgun is a powerful weapon of war. > politically if you think the goal is to recapture or save the federal state, you're naive or the enemy. the goal is the dissolution of the united states and it's foul revolutionary empire. michigan shall be free god save the confederation of michigan
United States