on the effectiveness of political movements  political movements lead to cycles of peace and violence that intensify over time, which is, by definition, unstable. stability should be the goal of any political revolution. regime changes naturally result in traumatic fluctuations, leading to significant disruptions and the loss of potential opportunities for growth and progress. these cycles are facilitated by the endless access to money by governing bodies, who are not obligated to spend this money wisely. endless money printing enables war, which in turn perpetuates the cycle of peace and suffering. the only stable solution to this problem is to address the issue of fiat money permanently. this can only be achieved by leveraging our primal motivations and using game theory to align individual incentives with collective good. bitcoin is the engineering solution to this problem. bitcoin fundamentally changes the way war funding operates. since it is impossible to print more bitcoin and every coin must be earned, a government seeking to fund a war would have to offer returns to potential investors. historically, this has been done through war bonds. without endless funding, endless wars become impossible. i am very ideological about bitcoin, so any criticism of my position is welcome (unless youre one of the "bitcoin bad, crypto goes to zero" retards).
Poland