you fucking idiot. you braindead retard, it wasn't a semantics argument you fucker, the argument is adaptation existing (change through remaining or reducing complexity) doesn't prove evolution existing (evolution requiring increasing complexity). if you can't prove how evolution increases complexity then you're left with "evolution" that can only remain or reduce complexity. therefore, where the fuck do humans come from according to this "evolution"? has to be something as complex as humans so it sure can't be fish or any other maritime life that is commonly said to be our ancestors. you fucking retard. you gaint baby reading "muh fishpeople" but can't even grasp the argument i'm making in the slightest. you giant buffoon.
Germany