genes for eye colour aren't a "phenotype". there are just four genes responsible for it. a mulatto in the us can have blue eyes. because the black person of one of the parents can have up to 30% white genes (due to mixing). when you combine this with a white person, you'll have roughly 65% white genes. and if they have traits like blue eyes, narrow nostrils, while that looks better it's actually bad news. because ~35% of the white genes are missing, and if you know a bunch of ones are already used for cosmetics, it's more likely important ones for empathy and intelligence are missing. even when we round it up to something like 75% white, it doesn't sound that bad right? until you learn that there's only a 1% genetic difference between us and chimps. and you learn about the african lineage, where they mated with some (now extinct) homind that wasn't neanderthal (that had bigger brains than cro magnon) but this species was actually primitive and had more in common with one of the missing links. it will not fully click with you until you see the map of various genetic populations and see how far africa is from europeans. > "white passing" is a meme. if you have to be autistic and have to reduce it down to just one thing, then "white acting" is a more appropriate thing, since there are more genes for behaviour and intelligence than skin and eye colour.
Ireland