john chrysostom > i said that the synagogue is no better than a theater and i bring forward a prophet as my witness. surely the jews are not more deserving of belief than their prophets. "you had a harlot's brow; you became shameless before all". where a harlot has set herself up, that place is a brothel. but the synagogue is not only a brothel and a theater; it also is a den of robbers and a lodging for wild beasts. jeremiah said: "your house has become for me the den of a hyena". he does not simply say "of wild beast", but "of a filthy wild beast", and again: "i have abandoned my house, i have cast off my inheritance". but when god forsakes a people, what hope of salvation is left? when god forsakes a place, that place becomes the dwelling of demons. > (2) but at any rate the jews say that they, too, adore god. god forbid that i say that. no jew adores god! who say so? the son of god say so. for he said: "if you were to know my father, you would also know me. but you neither know me nor do you know my father". could i produce a witness more trustworthy than the son of god? > (3) if, then, the jews fail to know the father, if they crucified the son, if they thrust off the help of the spirit, who should not make bold to declare plainly that the synagogue is a dwelling of demons? god is not worshipped there. heaven forbid! from now on it remains a place of idolatry. but still some people pay it honor as a holy place
Germany