i already proved you wrong, provided sources as evidence, gave definitions, exposed contradictions and ignorance.  i think you're the one having skill issues here, don't shift goal posts to a totally separate debate that you would also lose, try winning this one first - i proved your gnostic atheism is an oxymoron and does not exist; you cant prove it otherwise because you would have to prove oxford cambridge and webster are all wrong. i made sure i won before i replied in the first place. kek
Confederate