> and that's supposed to prove it's wrong ? kek. no not at all...its just a very popular level article and i think its interesting that you keep posting the same thing over and over without wanting to have something a bit more precise. > 1 msv of ionizing radiation is equivalent to about three chest x-rays. everything im seeing says 0.1msv for an xray (7msv for a ct scan for context).  > 2000msv depends over how long of course, thought that is a high number.  > not a problem i didn't say that
Canada