> i've already made my point, but i'll answer your question anyway. your point is retarded. you're holding on the basis that this guy is allegedly a "tribesman" that his murder is justified based on your dislike of jews.  this implies that if it wasn't the case, that is he isn't associated with jews, that his murder is still okay because of the morality of it. but it's a for-profit. so what you're essentially advocating for is a form of targeted racial violence where high status whites can be killed because they associate with jews, and barring evidence of this, this still remains the default judgement and is thus justified.  are you sure you're not an anti-white shill, rabbi?
United States