> the jewish question was always what to do with them given this dynamic they're divided on what to do with themselves (picrel)   > i never argued that they were not disproportionately involved in the slave trade any images i've posted represent actual books you can find on archive.org or libgen, and there's way more than one or two pages worth of the kind of information you're demanding, usually in the form of footnotes to other words, by other jewish historians. it's not just crackpot noi we wuzzers writing about this stuff; in fact, those noi sources might be deliberate strawmen, who knows. i think the best (and most absurd) examples are often the ones that whites assume were "fellow whites" -- like the dutch east india company, which was founded by jews fleeing spain and portugal during the ban on jews. the portugese jewish banking family financed the "glorious revolution" in england with a "blank check" on the understanding that they would be paid back in access to plantation trade in the new world. they were given written monopoly contracts by the government of england, france, portugal, spain, and the netherlands. how much more "dominant" can you be?
United States