i'd argue that the robowaifu movement isn't philosophically any different from the transgender movement. both seek to transfer the female role into a non female. subverting the reproductive impulse towards a pile of silicone and bolts isn't very different from subverting it towards a man in a dress with hormones and silicone tits. its a triumph of the symbol over the object in a very postmodern way. adherents to both beliefs elevate the symbols of thing above the essence of the thing, and i think the robowaifu stuff is pushed by troons and troon enablers because if you accept a robowaifu as an acceptable partner it becomes more difficult to deny troons.  throughout history this has been how they push the agenda forward. they meet resistance on something they want to push on the public, so they create a special case that preys on your vices to act like a philosophical trojan horse and weaken your opposition. for example feminism would never have succeeded if they hadn't played on the publics desire for causal sex without consequences. now half a century later we find the long term consequences to be the destruction of the family, broken homes, reduced birthrate, miserable coed workplaces with hr shrews ect. robowaifus are the bait to get the public to accept transhumanism, of which troons are small part of the agenda.  > inb4 foid detected a woman couldn't compose an argument of this level
United States