they're not charging her with vandalism, they're charging her with animal cruelty. which is nonsense. because animals cannot have rights as they are not persons. there is no such thing as cruelty to animals, as it presupposes animals have rights to life or certain standards of treatment and care. they are not human beings. their purpose is to be slaughtered for human ends. she is not going to be tried and convicted on whether or not she damaged property, but whether or not she was cruel to an animal. so the legal system is reduced to indian street-shitting over whether or not a goat was unjustly injured by a human being.  you can be imprisoned or prosecuted by the state for injuries to another human being, but not to an animal. it is complete nonsense. animals cannot and do not have rights, outside of barbaric pagan societies where they are viewed as sacred and equivalent to actual human beings.  i just find this so abnormal that it has to be explained. it is like inventing a charge 'cruelty to an anime body pillow'. it's not a person. americans are fucked in the head.
United States