> it absolutely is. otherwise he is neither omniscient or omnipotent there is a distinction between the will and the permission of god. > i've already explained how but you're welcome to disagree  you've explained nothing. > then he's not all powerful this is the midwit atheist's attempt at refutation of the doctrine of free will. but it is founded on several crass errors. enjoy your euphoria while it lasts, because it won't last long.
United States