part 2 > never managed to tame the female sexual cravings why would they need to be tamed if we've been able to satisfy it from the beginning? hypersexual women are an interesting bunch but most seem to carry childhood trauma with them which gets them to the point they're at, while most men are hypersexual to begin with. despite society becoming more sex positive, women's mental health has been in an immense decline, with more and more of them abusing medication than ever before. we often talk about how bad the young male mental health epidemic is but the truth is that compared to women, men as a whole have been immensely stable since the 50s mentally. > women cannot be contained in coats of conventions i'd rather argue the opposite, women tend to be more stuck on conventions and tradition as they imply stability essential for survival. women used to be more politically conservative until very recently ago, they just switched up because academia and corporations, the very face of stability, have been telling them to lean left. if women were inherently more liberal as you say, they wouldn't make up the majority of people going into islam. > a woman is pure sexual energy have you never had a good female friend, relative or caretaker? even assuming you're just talking from personal anecdotes, this feels very bold and out of nowhere. obviously women are strongly linked to their biological purpose but that purpose consists of so much more than simply the act of getting pregnant. > merges with her whorish self it's so hard to not make a basic "bro's just talking about his mom at this point" joke aaaaa > this is why all societies are flawed societal and governmental structure usually reflects family structure and if you see women as some sort of agent of chaos within, you'd be making a valid point. but there are too many examples in history of women acting as a beacon of hope and love in people's hearts that there's not really a lot of evidence for that
European