> why do you think westrons stopped hanging people for most crime over time, did they just get soft or was there a better reason? we're gonna find that out it's because as technology improved and we were able to actually prove whether or not someone was genuinely guilty of the crime, we kept finding out that juries frequently get it wrong and basically convict people not based on the actual evidence, but almost entirely based on the charisma (or lack thereof) of the accused, vs. popularity (or lack thereof) of the perceived "victim". case in point: that luigi guy is going to walk on the 100% premeditated murder of the ceo, because the mob has decided the ceo "deserved it" due to the company he worked for not paying out enough insurance claims, and the charisma of the murderer.
Australia