... thus the usa alphabet agencies are kind of stuck basically keeping anti-semitism that might result in opposition to us foreign or domestic policy down, and they too might end up redirecting people in a pro-israel direction. eurabia is useful because it gels well with "euros are weak losers who should be following the us lead more" american attitudes which give rise to stuff like freedom fries. in fact in context it seems like that the eurabia thing that egyptian jewish women propagated was intended for the purposes of saying the europeans were not getting on board with the early 2000s anti-islam crusade they wanted to have happen in order to boost israel's reputation amongst its faltering allies. since us policy was affectively controlled by neocon the alphabet agencies had to counter opposition to neocon views or at least promote people towards neocon type stuff, and the idea that europe was weak for not standing up to islamic countries was the excuse that was given for why the "coalition of the willing" was so small. the alphabet agencies were not controlled by jews, but since high level neo-con policy was being executed they inadvertently ended up signal boosting a lot of attitudes which were jewish in origin. not to mention that since david lane was a domestic threat channeling stuff into eurabia rather than white genocide just made sense as something they might do. thus you see how by the aligning of interests the jews can amplify their message massively, and they end up with not one intelligence agency, the mossad, but rather multiple ones either explicitly or implicitly pushing their messages. this however makes it seem like jews are massively over-influential as seemingly everything is just jews playing ping-pong with themselves where some jews says something and it need to be directed into something another jew says. this by itself draws attention to jews but it all seems incoherent and makes the people who notice it seem crazy ...
Canada