> rabbi harichem consents: > rabbi zakkavi's addition to the discussion of goyem self immolation belongs in a historical document not a management document, it is important social information he provides, but ultimately goyem need to be provided for, it is not that the goy was over conditioned it is that the organization responsible for his conditioning was unable to provide for the goyem proper socialization. indeed aron was in the service 1 of a military, which was not known to provide good pay or benefits, and 2 was in the indentured service of a nation which was not known to have happy citizens. the goyem was mateless and without prospects, therefore, like a black sheep seeking to spite the shepard, it cast itself repeatedly into danger until meeting it's foolish demise.  > rabbi benjamin rallarx counters: the goyem's clear propensity for foolishness and selfishness has been summarized nicely harichem. the sensitivity of the it is for precisely this reason that jews must carefully monitor goyem, especially those at high risks. jews should not be afraid to terminate such goyem as may, even unwittingly, take antisemetic actions. zakkivai comes perilously close, as always given his big heart, to sympathizing with them. it does not matter deeply the context of a goyem's self immolation. though one way or another it reflects poorly on the jewish people and should be prevented. even in the absence of jews.  > rabbi enolachi concludes: the current recommendation is that goyem with the capacity to behave self destructively be permitted in the event that no other good or service is consumed during their self destruction.
United States