> youre not exactly uncovering a secret conspiracy here utterly fucking irrelevant, firstly. secondly, you yourself don't even know the first thing about what the foreskin is nor the damage it does, you are utterly ignorant of not just that but the unwarranted and unjustified encouragement of it in the medical industry. > you guys sound exactly like feminist retards and it's so tiresome. babies dont get a choice in anything. an argument so retarded about this issue that you should be ashamed for having ever made it. those 2 things are not remotely comparable in the fucking slightest, it's a completely false equivalency. if you mutilate a child's penis, that penis is mutilated forever, there's no fixing that, and if it's botched like mine was then your nervous system is damaged for the rest of your life, irreversibly. the point is that the baby is going to grow into a man, and as a man you cannot ever, no matter what the fuck you do, reverse the mutilation that was done to you nor any damages, at all, whereas, on the contrary, if you hadn't been mutilated in a torture ritual the second you were born, you could grow up, and if you ever found need to have your dick mutilated, you can choose to have that done. people who don't think babies should be mutilated at birth and "my body my choice" feminists are so incomparable i'm surprised such an argument has ever come about. > at the end of the day, whats the big deal? oh i don't know, maybe i don't like that a significant functional part of my human body was torn and then slashed off of my genitalia in a torture ritual the moment i was born, leading to a damaged nervous system and a non functioning vagus nerve and no erogenous zones in my entire body past the scar on my dick, and the cut off foreskin harvested to be rubbed on some persons face in a face cream, maybe i think it would at least be, oh i don't know, a tad bit decent if we didn't mutilate the cocks of new born babies in the u.s.
United States