> i'm not taking sides. i wish my country would fuck off from the entire region. lol that's a naivety from such comfort speaking. > why should i give a crap if two insane sand people want to kill each other on the other side of the world?  it's more just one side that's insane. zionists are conquerors; it's not insane to conquer. you should care because your side has interests. > but my country's politicians are bought and paid for by israel, so my country is all up in their business. that's a very simplistic interpretation of it. the issue is preventing a islamic hegemon of the region forming of either the ottomans, persians, or arabs. originally the british plan was to create independent loyal arab houses in the region, but u.s. zionists pushed for israel so instead we have israel. it's way better to have something like this going on than it is for persia v ottomans v arabs, let alone having a winner. then you will get real fucking bullshit to deal with > but i recognize that it would be better if we could disengage for the region and send all muslims that are here back home. delusional. it won't be better and if you can send muslims back home then do it. if you can send muslims back home then why disengage? contradictory things. > i also recognize that will never happen because israel and jews will never allow it.  so all these people who love diversity and so on, none of them are goys? they're all da joos? it's not an issue of the browns themselves, it's not an issue of lefitsts etc, it's just da joos? has /pol/ rotted your brain so much? zionists don't give a shit, they look on in amazement and laugh. from zionist perspective it's west's problem, not theirs. > that's the underlying problem. fix that, and dealing with the other would be relatively easy. delusional. if u.s. loses hegemony in your lifetime well you just wait and see the reality of that. you come from naive perspective of power doesn't matter, and no sense of how far worse things can be.
United Kingdom