for some reason he was standing next to the door, for some reason before she even rang he opened it and maced her. these are the actual facts of the case, he was standing there and maced her for a reason. the entire case will be about that reason and whether there's proof or not of his reason. he's talking to his lawyers and didn't make a statement yet, so he will claim legal self-defense, she will claim he didn't have the right, and they will argue about circumstantial evidence. the entire case rests on a he-said, she-said account of what happened. your conjecture is irrelevant.
United States