> i guess you're retarded then. one of us is clearly i was pointing out that calling it a system for "financial profit" is superfluous keep up > let me dumb it down for you > running an entire economy for financial profit requires that the money supply grow constantly to generate the money needed for the profits. no it doesnt. its possible to refrain from printing fiat and still profit. there is nothing in the denition of profit that demands ever increasing gains. you could keep prices the same in perpetuity and still profit, to the extent of course that you are making more than you expended on production. you are adding shit to justify you false presupposition. all else that follows is wrong thereby. next > if you define the banking system as the real state then i agree. no, and nor would anyone else. because a bank isnt a state...they are inherently different. that some banks purchase state actors, is both irrelevant to this fact and only further proves this rality, as they wouldnt go through that process if they had power to bein with. > dishonest in addition to being an imbecile. 100% irrelevant. just because criminals do not adhere to laws, doesnt mean that certain laws arent good and moral. more to the point, that some criminals fail to obey said laws, is no argument against their existence. likewise, that politicians dont respect the rights of the individual, doesnt mean that the right to won property is false. anymore than saying that rape is ok, just because a woman s powerless to stop her assailant > i expect you'll reply with you got one thing right > well targeted applied violence. speaking of things that were expected to be said too late anon, i le ebil gabidalist have purchased your government and now wield that right to do 'tareted violence' oh oh! > my definition is correct. sorry kid. words mean what they did at their inception. not what faggots like you twisst them into, in order to fit their mania.
United States