are you having a stroke? i was talking about a specific part of his post, which is why i quoted it. he clearly talked about the ai "regurgitating" the information it was trained on, which is false. the purpose of ml isn't to regurgitate information, it's to generalize to previously unseen input. an llm doesn't store the data itself, it stores the values for the parameters of the trained distribution. a system that regurgitates information is a database, not an llm.   "the product" can work at different performance levels, and i'm not talking about specific implementations. i'm talking about the idea behind how llms and generative ai in general works, and what the brain-dead conspiracy tard said was flat-out wrong. your example is irrelevant.   suck his dick some more, fag.
Poland