(1/3) behind the scenes of the discussions and considerations regarding the attack in iran: > biden did not tell netanyahu "!don't", but tried to convince that an attack on iran's nuclear facilities or oil infrastructure would lead to a regional war, which he said was not in line with israel's interests. > in general, there are two strategies on netanyahu's table between which he will have to decide: one holds that an opportunity has arisen that will doubtless return to attack iran's nuclear facilities and possibly its oil industry as well, with the aim of undermining the regime.  > the second strategy holds that one must wait patiently for the elections in the us to find out who will be the next occupant of the white house. in the meantime, one must be satisfied with attacking military targets in iran, with an emphasis on the air defense systems and ballistic missile launch capabilities, in a way that will "open a path" to the real thing - attacking the nuclear facilities , which will be carried out at a more advanced stage. > if and when trump is elected, the us air force, which is equipped with heavy strategic bombers capable of dropping gbu57 type bunker busters weighing about 14 tons, can cause far greater damage to the iranian nuclear project than the israeli air force, which can mainly hit targets above the ground or those that are dug in several meters in it.
Task Force Z