> i know exactly what i am talking about. youre making assertions that have no basis in united states family court case law. except, you know, that i'm from the u.s. i had shared physical custody of my kids and still paid child support because my ex is an unemployed bitch and according to established u.s. case history it's in the "best interests" of the children to have a consistent level of material support wirh both parents. so kindly fuck off out of this thread. it's called the "best interest" standard and it's used to justify pretty much anything in u.s family law.
United States