again anecdotes. not evidence.  > because of failures in army medical care. either during the conflict or mental health treatment after the war. well yeah.  > no. a low unemployment rate below 3.5% typically makes it harder for new business for hire and expand. which is true if you consider the context. how does the ramping up of the mic affected that number? will it drop after the war again? how many open jobs are there.  > i'm saying there will be open jobs and business will struggle to recruit to workers because of the lack of frictional unemployment does it hold up in a war economy?  i dont get your point. we are talking about attrition. both sides are facing the same problems. doesnt ukraine face the same problems? who can hold out longer was the question.
Germany