he has said in the past that he tells lies on purpose to troll, which renders the whole idea of holding all anon posts up to a single consistent lens to see if they're josh null and void in the first place. that's aside from the sheer fucking npd it takes to imagine that you're important enough objectively or important enough to any particular user to merit such a resource intense analysis. it bothers me that he read a blog article on identifying users based on their written communication ability and now he thinks he's an expert, but equally i'm familiar enough with him to know that there's nothing useful to be gained by challenging him. sometimes you just have to let the retard shit in the corner and move on with the rest of the class as best you can. he doesn't need to respond, i have already accepted his concession.
United Kingdom