> look at anons post > its just pure strawman based gaslighting feigning ignorance within a context that loathes people talking about kike antics. > anon is literally trying to convince the one place on the internet that was built to contain discussion like this, that the way in which /pol/ goes about deducing kike mischief isn't properly formatted you're literally the person who will argue that just because anne franks dad used a ball point pen doesn't mean that the account of what happened isn't hyperbolically depicted despite him not being aware of what actually happened physically due to the way that camp worked. nazi court documents that indict them unironically contradict dadio's account. so while i can say that it did happen, it didn't happen the way he depicted it. and why is this being used as an example?  because in your case all you're doing is misrepresenting what has already transpired to not be significant because it doesn't happen within some arbitrary time table as depicted by you when you read what anon's discuss. you're just gaslighting and comically bad at it. > literally the "it was fake and gay in my mind, dammit!"
United States