> one of obviously dubious provenance, which you ascribe to anons generally; i only ever saw it once before, when a memeflag with similar rhetoric style as yourself was obsessing over it like you did today. if someone takes the time to demonstrate that a statistic which has been constantly posted here for years is false it's evidence of some sort of fixation. best not to bother doing so, let anons use a statistic which is not only obviously false but easily demonstrated as such. > . you were neither interested in any other source, or the factuality of jewish involvement  because i never disputed that jews were over represented in the slave trade. > as far as i know, you made up that statistic, i can't find it anywhere else.   ch/image/ry-z36pxlrspcmu1unmobg/   ch/image/6ksfmr1amctabzfkzmbmig/   ch/image/ae98t_j2-e3za1xe96jbhg/   ch/image/qzh9pyqiatnemtfor1fg8g/   ch/image/jxiqgml0gfwtiljygoct5w/   ch/image/8356xoqkxf78eur8oedwxg/   ch/image/3pi0owk6ce1fdiygl1r30g/   ch/image/5anr4qokldzczpfxq_dlyq/   ch/image/aipqbvjzaydxm9sz9mx2cq/
Pirate