> why do you reject texts such as: > the historical acts of pilate lmao top trolling mate > josephus no josephus manuscript from before the 4th century contains any mention of jesus. i'm honestly embarrassed that you brought that up, anon. > tacitus likewise does not even contain the word "jesus". tacitus is plainly writing about someone with a similar-sounding name; we can be sure about that because the same guy is also mentioned by suetonius. even if tacitus is writing about "our" jesus then he's just repeating what roman christians told him, so it doesn't count as independent evidence for a historical jesus anyway.  fucking hell, how many more times do i have to repeat these facts to you schmuckos
United Kingdom