my fucking sides. and this is exactly why i wasnt taking you seriously. anon, you are the retarded midwit in this conversation; you have been the entire time and you've been too stupid to realize it. not only that, but i broadly agree with some of your points, but holy shit you explain them in a dumb way. you're arguing for an ethnic nationalist eugenics program predicated not only on iq, but relativistic capacity to contribute taxes. this is an ontological argument that people who are unable to contribute to society do not deserve to be considered human. now let me ask you a few simple questions i already know the answers to, and i am absolutely walking you into a trap i know you're too stupid to avoid. what happens if you lose the capacity to work due to age, accident, or illness? in addition, what if people you wish to define as undesirable on an ethnic basis can contribute more tax revenue than persons of your preferred ethnicities? finally, how do you handle people who contribute a large amount of taxes and are your preferred ethnicity, but fundamentally disagree with your approach to eugenics?
Canada