> we can argue in the frame of our reality, our laws, logic and causality. > from this point, we can absolutely state, that an eternal universe is not possible, just like we can state that a square circle is impossible. > that is the logical argument. an argument which we can make with our logic, without having any scientific facts. you are not making any logical arguments. you're treating a dubious cosmological framework as axiomatic but you're not even bothering to logically derive anything from it. you simply assert that if physics can only trace things back as far as this supposed big bang, nothing could possibly have preceded it -- something you have not logically justified. > muh heat death head canon this is also disputed by theoretical physicists.
Moldova