> criminals because men are the ones who will engage in the most risk-reward situations, compared to women who are generally more tame. > why are males more likely to be at the bottom of the bell curve when it comes to intelligence? why are males more likely to be at the top of the bell curve when it comes to intelligence ? > why are males more likely to struggle with communication skills? they don't. factual communication and exchange of relevant data is a male-dominated field. women are great to express inner feeling but their lack of accountability, factuality and general objectiveness makes them terrible at any kind of conversation. garbage sentences are not conversations. > why are males more likely to be "neurodivergent?" what you call "neurodivergent" is only symptomatic of a female-point-of-view that would judge what's "normal" and "abnormal" based only on social criterias, as women are prone to do. males are more oriented to actually be themselves than to follow the "mainstream" train of thought, while the sheeple actually following those social standards (women) will then denominate them with retarded terms like "neurodivergent". they will then proceed to claim "neurodivergence" themselves to distinguish themselves from the cattle (aka : "i'm not like the other girls, y'know... ?") > why are males more far more likely to have behavioral disorders? see the previous answers. > i've witnessed how poorly most of you articulate yourselves. i've seen your inability to construct cogent arguments to support your pre-conceived conclusions.  at least we articulate ourselves. the only thing you seem to master is to ask retarded questions that anyone with a smidge of pattern recognition would have been able to deduce on their own. i've experienced your propensity to engage in personal attacks when you know you can't provide logical reasons for your views. when it comes down to it, your only power play is violence. "if you can't beat her argument, beat her."
Switzerland