> my own perspective is that it is, by and large, impossible for most other races to maintain the generations of delayed gratification it would take for eugenics to yield a result. further, it isn't our responsibility to hold them to it, and if we did make an attempt on the necessary scale for improvement, it would be an act of altruism on an unprecedented scale. i would support eugenics, but am aware there's a severe risk of genetic intermingling and pollution involved. reasonable points and objections. > if bioengineering is possible, and it will be, we must do everything in our power to elevate the whole of humanity. even the dumbest nigger is still human, and there is a vibrant, comatose soul inside of his dark nigger flesh that deserves to be elevated above the inadequacies of the meat birth endowed it. i believe technology is a beautiful thing, and in capable, white hands, could bring us to a new era of mutual understanding. i agree. genus homo is human, even if we are all separate subspecies and species of human. even erectus was "human". it's not that far off in the future where such bioengineering could be attempted. the intelligence would likely be one of the easier parts, harder would be behavior and personality modification. i think one of the most powerful arguments against leftards who deny these racial differences is that they are permanently dooming cognitively and behaviorally disadvantaged races to never improving and always remaining disadvantaged, and all for ideological concerns. pushing for bioengineering also gives normalfaggots a new way to virtue signal, except it would be to their/our benefit for fucking once.
Canada