> points out that jews want white men to hate women and you don't want white men to do that, right? you don't want them to hate women. you're upset that some of them do, right? you're lamenting that they are doing it, aren't you? in other words... wait for it... you're complaining about misogyny. > are you denying the fact that jews want white men to hate women y/n? it doesn't matter because to reduce the legitimate complaints and concerns that men have about our feminist system and the effects it has had on our lives to misogyny is a gross error. these are legitimate concerns, and there are incentive problems that feminism has created in our societies. dismissing those concerns and incentives as misogyny is flawed logic. it's not misogyny, it's, to put it as mildly as i can put it, policy disagreement.  > if you refuse to answer this simple question, you have lost the argument and will be eternally butthurt. this is childish nonsense. this isn't a courtroom. i'm not obliged to accept your characterization of our disagreement. and i don't. what you awardly call "women hate" (misogyny) i call valid concerns about a feminist super-structure that has perverted male (and female) incentives. if you're unwilling to be honest about this and address it squarely you're forever going to spin your wheels like you are now.
United States