Suppose Honourable senators, what can we do when one can fairly conclude, after a fair read of the current controversy between Mr. Justice McClung and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub and their respective decision, that both justices fell below standards of appropriate judicial self-restraint - Justice McClung in his obviously injudicious letter, and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub in her injudicious or intemperate language in her decision?
Can we infer that "The two justices both acted inappropriately"? Yes, no, or maybe?
Suppose Honourable senators, what can we do when one can fairly conclude, after a fair read of the current controversy between Mr. Justice McClung and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub and their respective decision, that both justices fell below standards of appropriate judicial self-restraint - Justice McClung in his obviously injudicious letter, and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub in her injudicious or intemperate language in her decision? Can we infer that "The two justices both acted inappropriately"? Yes, no, or maybe?