Suppose (3) The refusal by a traveller to answer any question asked by a preclearance officer does not in and of itself constitute reasonable grounds for the officer to suspect that a search of the traveller is necessary for the purposes of this Act or that an offence has been committed under section 33 or 34.".
Can we infer that "If a traveller doesn't answer questions, the officer can search that traveller"? Yes, no, or maybe?
Suppose (3) The refusal by a traveller to answer any question asked by a preclearance officer does not in and of itself constitute reasonable grounds for the officer to suspect that a search of the traveller is necessary for the purposes of this Act or that an offence has been committed under section 33 or 34.". Can we infer that "If a traveller doesn't answer questions, the officer can search that traveller"? Yes, no, or maybe?