Suppose -- I really think this is an important question and, as Justice O'Connor points out, if we have to ask what's the most plausible explanation for this rule, to reward existing vested interest or to stimulate former new works, it seems to me that it's probably the former.
Can we infer that "Justice O’Conner thinks the rule favors stimulating former new works "? Yes, no, or maybe?
Suppose -- I really think this is an important question and, as Justice O'Connor points out, if we have to ask what's the most plausible explanation for this rule, to reward existing vested interest or to stimulate former new works, it seems to me that it's probably the former. Can we infer that "Justice O’Conner thinks the rule favors stimulating former new works "? Yes, no, or maybe?