Suppose Petitioners submit such a blanket extension of existing terms exceeds Congress's power under the Copyright Clause and it violates the First Amendment. Now, the Government has responded to petitioners' argument in a way that betrays a simple but fundamental confusion.
Can we infer that "the existing terms won't set the limits Congress's power under the Copyright Clause and it violates the First Amendment."? Yes, no, or maybe?
Suppose Petitioners submit such a blanket extension of existing terms exceeds Congress's power under the Copyright Clause and it violates the First Amendment. Now, the Government has responded to petitioners' argument in a way that betrays a simple but fundamental confusion. Can we infer that "the existing terms won't set the limits Congress's power under the Copyright Clause and it violates the First Amendment."? Yes, no, or maybe?