Suppose Don Brash leader of the New Zealand National Party said that the White Crusaders of the Racial Holy War are "a small, fascist underbelly, hell-bent on causing division and destroying New Zealand's egalitarian ethos."
Can we infer that "Don Brash is an impartial source of information."? Yes, no, or maybe?
Suppose Don Brash leader of the New Zealand National Party said that the White Crusaders of the Racial Holy War are "a small, fascist underbelly, hell-bent on causing division and destroying New Zealand's egalitarian ethos." Can we infer that "Don Brash is an impartial source of information."? Yes, no, or maybe?