Is using the result of cmp() as an index "too cryptic"? This is a very subjective question, but I'm curious as to other people's opinions.

Would you find this bit of code distasteful? Is it cryptic and unreadable, or is it using features of the language in an elegant way?

def winning_side(home_goals, away_goals):
    """Takes a home score and an away score, and returns the winner

    Return DRAW, HOME or AWAY depending on the outcome
    """
    return (DRAW, HOME, AWAY)[cmp(home_goals, away_goals)]


The alternative obviously being explicit if-else statements:

def winning_side(home_goals, away_goals):
    """Takes a home score and an away score, and returns the winner

    Return DRAW, HOME or AWAY depending on the outcome
    """
    if home_goals &gt; away_goals:
        return HOME
    elif away_goals &gt; home_goals:
        return AWAY
    else:
        return DRAW


I personally find the verbose if-else logic in the latter solution, and the assumed equality in the 3rd branch, less appealing.
The documentation to cmp says nothing about the return value except it being negative, zero or positive, so you rely on implementation-dependent behaviour.  This exact function will also not work in Python 3, as there is no cmp function anymore.

I'd say use the second option or shorten it a bit:

def winning_side(home_goals, away_goals):
    if home_goals == away_goals:
        return DRAW

    return HOME if home_goals &gt; away_goals else AWAY