The Church-Turing thesis and Hyper-computation I am not a computer scientist and this is my first question.
This question is a question in layman terms and I also want the answer in layman terms.
When I searched hyper-computation. There was a list of models of hyper-computers.
Now, my question is that what are the problems with those models and if it is possible to  create models of computers which can compute non-Turing computable things then doesn't, that already proves the Church-Turing thesis wrong and if it does prove that Church-Turing thesis is wrong then why people still consider it to be a thing?
The Church–Turing thesis is about physically realizable machines. To the best of our knowledge, hypercomputation models cannot be realized in the physical world. They are a figment of our imagination.
If someone would find a new law of physics which enables solving the halting problem, that would make a big fuss in the world of science. But I am not holding my breath.