Turing machine: errata in computable numbers paper? I'm reading Turing On Computable Number 1936, specifically the section pictured here:



Does anyone see errata here?  Should the second m-configuration "c" in the table, have the "final m-config" be gothic e instead of the gothic c used? 

If this were the case then 010101... could be printed.  If not, I'm unsure how 010101... is printed.

Thanks for your input.
The final m-config for the second configuration is an "e".