Is the given grammar LL(2)? http://dickgrune.com/Books/PTAPG_1st_Edition/BookBody.pdf

The book by Grune and Jacobs presents an example of a grammar that is $LL(K + 1)$ but not $LL(K)$

The example is $S -&gt; a^kb/a^ka$

The grammar of this type is $LL(K + 1)$ but not $LL(K)$.



I have an example based on the grammar shown. Is this also $LL(2)$ ?

$S-&gt; cca/ccb$ 

Based on the information above, I just want to confirm that is this grammar also $LL(2)$ but not $LL(1)$ ?
It is actually $LL(3)$. Try to prove it yourself.