Why is the second half of the FFT negative frequencies There are lots of questions here about what the negative frequencies in fft mean, but I'm confused on why the second half of the fft calculation is the correct calculation for a negative frequency. 

The equation is
$$X[k]=\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}x[n]e^{-j2 \pi kn/N}$$

I interpret this as the correlation between a wave with 1 cycle over N, a wave with 2 cycle over N, a wave with 3 cycles over N.

Let say I'm using 10 bins, numpy will tell me the 10th bin is actually representing a negative frequency. But looking at the equation isn't it a correlation between the signal and a signal with 10 cycles over the full period? If they plugged in a negative k into this equation that would make sense. Why does plugging in big values of K give the correlation for a negative frequency?
If you say that plugging in a negative value for $k$ would make sense to you then have a look at this:

$$\begin{align}X[N-1]&amp;=\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}x[n]e^{-j2\pi (N-1)n/N}\\&amp;=\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}x[n]e^{-j2\pi n}e^{j2\pi n/N}\\&amp;=\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}x[n]e^{j2\pi n/N}=X[-1]\end{align}$$

The DFT $X[k]$ is periodic with period $N$, so it doesn't matter if you consider the interval $k\in[0,N-1]$, or $k\in[-N/2+1,N/2]$ (assuming $N$ is even).