Lightning - Question about force-closures of channels and its impact on recovering funds Dear Lightning experts,

someone mentioned in context with lightning channels the following things, and I would like to ask you if this statements are true, and if yes, is this a problem in a future world where lightning becomes mainstream, how would we prevent such scenario of not returning funds`?

"The mnemonic seed will not allow you to recover funds that are off-chain in lightning channels...EVEN if the peer force-closes the Channel! And Static channel backups will not fix this..."

So question is: Why not designing it in this way:  "IF  there is a force-closure by the other party, THEN your funds are DIRECTLY automatically returned back to your wallet."?

Why in the world was the abovementioned automatic solution not in place now (or is it??)? Because of watchtowers or other stuff? 

If above statement about not being able to recover... is not true, then pls elaborate kindly what the actual "return mechanism" is in such force-closure scenarios?

Thank you all
Sorry René, it seems you fell into a Bcasher trap here ;) OP phrased his question very vaguely and then proceeded to cry CENSORSHIP when you admitted there might be some truth contained in what he alluded to. 

In reality, the case OP is alluding to is a very rare edge case that could ONLY occur, if the following things are ALL true: 
1. You don't back up your channel state.
2. You don't give your channel to a watchtower.
3. You lose your channel state.
4. Your channel partner knows this.
5. Your channel partner has an old channel state that is more advantageous to him.
6. Your channel partner is evil.

This particular combination is easy to avoid and doesn't really occur in practice.

In a normal force-close, OF COURSE your funds are automatically returned to you.