Get Latest blocks with bitcoind on Ubuntu The total blockcount on my machine is not increasing. I have tried doing a bitcoind -reindex -daemon, but it didn't ultimately increase the number of blocks.

Attaching machine and bitciond information below. 

Operating System:

my_machine ~ $ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:    Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
Release:    14.04
Codename:   trusty


Bitcoin daemon:

my_machine ~ $ bitcoind getinfo
{
    "version" : 90300,
    "protocolversion" : 70002,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 322082,
    "timeoffset" : 1,
    "connections" : 8,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 29829733124.04041672,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1422374797,
    "keypoolsize" : 100,
    "unlocked_until" : 0,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "relayfee" : 0.00001000,
    "errors" : "Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues."
}


UPDATE: Per the issue explained here: http://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/message/33222029/, it appears that OpenSSL is the issue.  I tried to rectify the latest block being stuck at 322082 by doing the following

git clone -b 0.9 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git bitcoin-0.9
cd bitcoin-0.9
./autogen.sh
cd src
./configure
./configure --with-incompatible-bdb
make
make check
stop bitcoind
bitcoind -daemon -server -reindex


I then waited for the reindex to finish but I still have the same problem. Am I doing something wrong? How can I test that I have the right version of OpenSSL required?
According to this GitHub discussion it turns out that the problem is caused by OpenSSL moving to 0.9.4.0 binaries should resolve your issue.

Gregory Maxwell


  The incompatibility is due to the OpenSSL update changing the
  behavior of ECDSA validation to reject any signature which is
  not encoded in a very rigid manner.  This was a result of
  OpenSSL's change for CVE-2014-8275 "Certificate fingerprints
  can be modified".
  
  While for most applications it is generally acceptable to eagerly
  reject some signatures, Bitcoin is a consensus system where all
  participants must generally agree on the exact validity or
  invalidity of the input data.  In a sense, consistency is more
  important than "correctness".