Benchmarks for second round CAESAR competitors I'm interested in how the second round CAESAR competitors stack up in terms of software performance against each other and against chacha20-poly1305 with both small and large messages. Sadly the only numbers I can find are on their individual websites, and due to most likely different testing methods and hardware those aren't really comparable. Are there any comparison tables or something similar that I just haven't been able to find?
Benchmarks for 2nd-round candidates are now available at the eBACS website. There is also an independent report comparing candidates' performance.