What Cipher Suite in this list is the worst to use I have a list of cipher suites I captured using Wireshark. Which one of these cipher suites would possibly be the worst to use. Here is the list.

In my opinion, I choose the:

TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA

to be the worst because it uses a 128 bit key and uses CBC instead of GCM cipher mode. Is there any cipher suite that would be less secure here compared to others in the list?
Assuming you are actually asking whether any cipher suite is objectively worse than the others, the answer is clear:

TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA. Why? Well, this cipher suite suffers from 3 "major" problems, at least one of which is remedied by any of the other cipher suites:


Lack of forward secrecy. This cipher suite doesn't use any form of (EC)DHE key exchange, thus if the private RSA key is leaked (eg through a server compromise), all passively captured past data exchanges can be decrypted.
Use of CBC. TLS has a history of having (somewhat practically exploitable) issues with its padding used for CBC, e.g. POODLE or with IV selection, e.g. BEAST. Also notable here is Lucky13, which apparently is somewhat hard to mitigate if you want to use CBC. The CBC padding issues are  available to attackers because AES-CBC is used in a mac-then-encrypt situation where the padding is removed before the message is authenticated.
Use of a cipher with a small block size. If you use a block cipher with a $n$-bit block cipher, you expect to see a collision in the CBC ciphertext after about $2^{n/2}$ blocks. With AES, this is $2^{64}$, but with 3DES this is $2^{32}$ blocks (due to its 64-bit blocksize) which gave reason for the Sweet32 attack.


You may also want to note that technically the security margin of three key 3DES is 112-bit, as opposed to AES' 128-bit, so it's worse off even there, but it's a matter of "meh, can't brute-force" vs "meh, can't brute-force".