Can placebo effect be increased by modifying the perception about prescription/intake setting? I've noticed the following pattern within my own thinking - multiple unrelated events "combine" to produce a certain action, particularly creativity and innovation. I'm trying to understand if this phenomenon is true or common among people. As a way to learn more about this, I thought that placebo effect would be a good place to start.

To clarify my question: imagine you are going to get a drug prescription. It will be a placebo, but you don't know that. Would combining factors like below increase the effectiveness of placebo?


clean doctors office
a traditional white coat doctor like on stock photos treating you
positive demeanor of staff
perception of privacy
thinking you are being prescribed a drug you have researched well and feel safe about
seeing a presentation about the advances of modern medicine within a week before 


Contrast this with the following:


a dark, cramped waiting room
long wait and short consultation
a physician assistant or a nurse practitioner seeing you instead of MD
unknown drug you have never heard of
perceiving some negative news within last week


I'm trying to understand if a combination of unrelated events indeed does combine to affect the effectiveness of placebo? If so, is there the primary cause of change (like PA-C prescribing vs MD)?

I found the following on Wikipedia which makes me even more curious:


  The expectancy effect[of placebo] can be enhanced through factors such as the
  enthusiasm of the doctor, differences in size and color of placebo
  pills, or the use of other interventions such as injections. In one
  study, the response to a placebo increased from 44% to 62% when the
  doctor treated them with "warmth, attention, and confidence."[47]


Here is what I think the traditional expectation of a doctor is:
I think the field of persuasive communication is relevant for your answer, as well as research into the efficacy of psychotherapy.

Customers trust advertising if it is communicated by:


attractive persons
credible experts


Psychotherapy is more effective if:


the therapist believes that his methods are effective (!)
patient and therapist share the same world view and values
patient and therapist like each other


What constitutes attractiveness, expertise, common values, and sympathy, will differ among individuals. For some, expensive architecture makes a bank more trustworthy; for others it is a sign of waste and mismanagement. So you will have to identify the exact parameter value for each target group or, for perfect fit, even each individual person. But basically what you have here are moderators that affect the efficacy of a placebo.

What is noteworthy is that the belief of the person administering the placebo has an effect. So it's better they don't know it is a placebo, but have been given it by a person they in turn trust.



There is a lot of research into both areas; I give only one introductory source each (both of which respectively include what I quoted above):


Goldstein, N. J., Martin, S. J., &amp; Cialdini, R. B. (2008). Yes!: 50 Scientifically Proven Ways to Be Persuasive. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wampold, Bruce E. (2001). The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods and Findings. New York: Routledge.


Don't be fooled by the popular nature of the first book; Robert Cialdini is an eminent expert on persuasion. If you want, there are more scientific publications by this author.