Status of overdue glaciation hypothesis What is the status of the Early Anthropocene hypothesis, in the specific meaning that the climate would be projected to be significantly cooler (such as, on the order of by 0.8 degrees in the planet average) in a year corresponding to, say, 1800, if there was no agricultural revolution and no significant impact of our species on the climate starting several thousand years before that?

This is a layman's question.  I'm familiar with Ruddiman's work and some of its early criticisms, but I'm unsure what the current generation of scientists thinks about the issue and if there's any strong recent evidence either way which I should read about.

Please don't focus too much on my use of the terms "anthropocene" or "glaciation" themselves in this question, but feel free to suggest better ways to refer to the above hypothesis or its current successors.
Our interglacial ends some 1500-years from now, the AGU recently recognized the Holocene as geo-engineered by people converting forest to agriculture.

We passed a warm-ocean tipping point for northern hemispheric winters, frozen oranges in Florida and rain in Alaska now will be common.

Our emissions rate is far beyond natural systems, the rate of change coming out of the last ice-age was 1-ppm/180-years, we hit 3ppm/year in 2016, 540-times faster.

And, the max CO2 during the late Pleistocene was 305-ppm, we hit that in 1916 and added 100-ppm in 100-years.

This carbon bomb is acidifying the oceans 10-times faster than the worst land extinction in geologic history.

It's very unwise what we're doing.