Why did my GFCI by my kitchen sink burn up?
First, if you replace breakers as a precaution, be VERY careful to get the correct breaker for your panel (even if the last guy didn't).  I am concerned that a non-necessary breaker swap could result in a correct (say: Murray) breaker being swapped for an incorrect (say: HOMeline) breaker, which would then cause other bus arcing problems later.
Also it's vital to use factory provided handle ties, not a sawn off nail, because the proper ties force the phases to be opposite.
Now you have a multi-wire branch circuit in which someone did a big naughty.  They used the neutral terminals on the device as a way to splice the supply neutral to the onward-power neutral (and also supply the device obviously).  That's not allowed; the neutral must always be pigtailed anywhere both hots are present.  That is so a device can be removed without knocking out power to the other half of the circuit.
Since you're supposed to pigtail anyway, and you need a GFCI there, and the screw terminal looks serviceable in traditional mode... you should pigtail this neutral and attach the pigtail to the old GFCI &quot;the old fashioned way&quot; so you have GFCI protection again.
Now, there are 2 possible failure modes here.
Improper torquing of the screw-and-clamp connection
In this arrangement, the screw clamps the one or two wires placed under the screw.  If the screw is not tightened to the correct torque, a poor connection will result in overheating, possible arcing, and exactly the damage you see.
Because of this, Code was amended in 2014? 2017? to require use of a torque screwdriver to set all torques.
Where was the current coming from to do this damage?  One of the various devices or outlets that flows onward from this location - note that all the MWBC's neutral current comes right through here.
Current travels in loops, so any current going out a &quot;hot&quot; must come back a &quot;neutral&quot;.  Now if the MWBC is properly phased, some of the A-leg's current will travel down neutral to a B-leg load, and then return via that B-leg (so a bigger loop, with 2 loads in it).   The neutral in a proper MWBC never carries more current than a hot.
Misplacement of the breakers, resulting in overload of the neutral
This is the problem with individual (or duplex) breakers used for an MWBC.  If both breakers are on the same &quot;leg&quot; of power, the neutral handles all the return current for both hots, added together - so up to 40A of current.  Now, 15-20A receptacles are required to have 20A internal through-busing, but obviously not 40A - so this is likely to burn up the internal busing that connects the two terminals that you're not supposed to use as a splice.
If both breakers are on opposite legs, then neutral only handles difference current - if one hot is 17A and the other hot is 15A, neutral only handles 2A.  It's impossible for neutral to carry more than the breaker trip, so that works out great.
This is why MWBCs require at the least, two breakers with a factory handle-tie (which forces them to be on opposite legs) -- and at the most, a 2-pole 240V breaker.
This is especially vexing in GE panels, where it is very easy to mis-phase their double-stuffed 1/2&quot; wide breakers. In a GE panel, consider it mandatory to use a 2-pole breaker, and don't force it into a space it doesn't want to go into!