Does innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 1 wear out SSDs more than innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 2?
innodb_flush_logs_at_trx_commit
When 1:
for each Txn Commit { 
    - Write log buffer to log file
    - flush log files to disk
    }

When 0:
Approx every second {
    - Write log buffer to log file
    - flush log files to disk
    }

When 2:
    {
    - For each commit: { Write log buffer to log file }
    - Appx every sec: { flush log files to disk }
    }


Because the flush to disk operation only occurs approximately once per second, you can lose up to a second of transactions in an operating system crash or a power outage.

Well I just copied all of the above from documentation ;)

Anyways, now about your points.


innodb_flush_logs_at_trx_commit changed: Choice is between ACID vs speed. You changed it to 2 for performance.okay but you know the risk.
Moving to SSDs: They're proven to be faster than their ancestors... and considering that, you better benchmark your traffic with the preferable value of innodb_flush_logs_trx_commit of 1 (default) on SSDs.
Is the same amount of data...?: Well yes amount of data will be ofcourse same; though you might wanted to ask something else. We know  that how it improves the perfomance is by reducing number of disk ops.


So, "Does innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 1 wear out SSDs more than innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 2?" -> Regardless of disk type, value of 1 is bound to do more work (disk ops) than value of 2 and hence the performance difference.