Does this set of locks imply table lock and if so is it avoidable?
Reference:


Lock Modes


See above reference for more details.

Intent = Used to establish a lock hierarchy. The types of intent locks are: intent shared (IS), intent exclusive (IX), and shared with intent exclusive (SIX).


  Intent Locks
  
  The Database Engine uses intent locks to protect placing a shared (S)
  lock or exclusive (X) lock on a resource lower in the lock hierarchy.
  Intent locks are named intent locks because they are acquired before a
  lock at the lower level, and therefore signal intent to place locks at
  a lower level.
  
  Intent locks serve two purposes:
  
  
  To prevent other transactions from modifying the higher-level    resource in a way that would invalidate the lock at the lower level.
  To improve the efficiency of the Database Engine in detecting lock    conflicts at the higher level of granularity.
  
  
  For example, a shared intent lock is requested at the table level
  before shared (S) locks are requested on pages or rows within that
  table. Setting an intent lock at the table level prevents another
  transaction from subsequently acquiring an exclusive (X) lock on the
  table containing that page. Intent locks improve performance because
  the Database Engine examines intent locks only at the table level to
  determine if a transaction can safely acquire a lock on that table.
  This removes the requirement to examine every row or page lock on the
  table to determine if a transaction can lock the entire table.