How to make a union view execute more efficiently?
The comments on the question show that the issue is that the test database the OP was using to develop the query had radically different data characteristics than the production database.  It had much fewer rows and the field being used for filtering wasn't selective enough.

When the number of distinct values in a column is too small the index may not be sufficiently selective.  In this case a sequential table scan is cheaper than an index seek/row lookup operation.  Typically a table scan makes exensive use of sequential I/O, which is much faster than random access reads.  

Often, if a query would return more than just a few percent of rows it will be cheaper just to do a table scan than an index seek/row lookup or similar operation that makes heavy use of random I/O.