$RL=L$ Progress Since 2006
One line of work has shown how to improve the analysis of the classic INW PRG for the special cases of fooling regular and permutation branching programs. The seed length is only $\widetilde{O}(\log n)$ or $O(\log n)$ in some cases. [LRTV09] [BV10] [De11] [KNP11] [Ste12] [BRRY14] [HPV21]
Another line of work has developed a PRG framework based on iterated pseudorandom restrictions. This framework has been used to fool various classes of functions that can be computed by &quot;arbitrary-order&quot; read-once branching programs. Again, in some cases the seed length is $\widetilde{O}(\log n)$ or even $O(\log n)$. [GMRTV12] [GLS12] [RSV13] [CSV15] [SVW17] [CHRT18] [HLV18] [FK18] [MRT19] [DHH19] [Lee19] [LV20] [DHH20] [DMRTV21]
The paper referenced in the original question is part of a line of work that uses spectral techniques to design graph algorithms for space-bounded derandomization. That line of work, which most famously includes Reingold's algorithm for undirected connectivity, has continued. Recently the focus has been on simulating random walks of length much less than the mixing time of the graph. [CRV11] [MRSV17] [MRSV19] [AKMPSV20]
Finally, there is a line of work designing improved low-error generalized PRGs for polynomial-width read-once branching programs. By &quot;generalized PRGs,&quot; I am referring to (a) hitting set generators and (b) weighted pseudorandom generators, aka pseudorandom pseudodistribution generators. [BCG20] [HZ20] [CL20] [CDRSTS21] [PV21] [Hoz21]

Please forgive me for inevitably omitting many excellent papers from this summary, including lots of work that doesn't fit neatly into the four themes above.
See also: Reingold's two-part presentation &quot;Recent Developments Related to RL vs. L&quot; at the DIMACS Day of Complexity Tutorials prior to CCC 2019, and the STOC 2020 workshop &quot;Derandomizing Space-Bounded Computation&quot; organized by Meka, Tal, and Zuckerman.