Is the exponent in floating point numbers signed or unsigned
This is mostly a matter of interpretation. For IEEE 754 floating point numbers (one of the most common implementations), an exponent bias is used:


  In IEEE 754 floating point numbers, the exponent is biased in the engineering sense of the word – the value stored is offset from the actual value by the exponent bias. Biasing is done because exponents have to be signed values in order to be able to represent both tiny and huge values, but two's complement, the usual representation for signed values, would make comparison harder.
  
  To solve this problem the exponent is biased before being stored, by adjusting its value to put it within an unsigned range suitable for comparison.


For floating point numbers with single-precision, the effective exponent has 8 bits and ranges from -126 to 127. However, the internal exponent ranges from 1 to 254, meaning that 127 has been added to the effective exponent.
(This means it is valid to say that the exponents of floating point numbers are stored as unsigned integers, even though this is a matter of interpretation.)

In addition to the reasons outlined above, another good reason for this encoding is that two special exponents are required for floating point encoding according to IEEE 754: Floating point numbers can also store the values Infinity, NaN and denormalized values which would be too small to store them in the usual format.

The special constants used are the internal exponents $0$ and $2^r-1$ (where $r$ is the number of bits of the exponent), so in binary $0...0$ and $1...1$. These values are easy to recognize. Note that these exponents belong to effective exponents that are barely ever used. If we had used the internal exponent $0$ without shifting the range, it would be the same as the effective exponent $0$, making it difficult to encode common number ranges.