Real life description for (~A->A)->A
Since $A$ is always the same atomic statement, every direkt translation is going to be weird. Also, natural language does not do well with (nested) implications; we typically say "leads to" not "logically implies" in reality.

I suggest you transform the formula to

$\qquad\begin{align*}
         &amp;(\lnot A \to A) \to A \\
  \equiv &amp;\lnot(\lnot A \to A) \lor A \\
  \equiv &amp;\lnot(A \lor A) \lor A \\
  \equiv &amp;\lnot A \lor A,
\end{align*}$

which is, of course, a tautology (as you've stated):


  You will help me, or you won't [, your choice].


Coming up with more complicated sentences won't give you more (logical) meaning -- all tautologies are equivalent (in Boolean logic), after all.