Is violence or destruction ever correct?
The Buddha warned against anger and his warning is quite precise:


  SN1.71:2.3: What’s the one thing, Gotama, whose killing you approve?”
  
  SN1.71:3.1: “When anger’s incinerated you sleep at ease. When anger’s incinerated there is no sorrow.  O deity, anger has a poisoned root and a honey tip.  The noble ones praise its killing,  for when it’s incinerated there is no sorrow.”


And even if all those around us may be cruel, the Buddha says quite directly:


  MN8:12.2: ‘Others will be cruel, but here we will not be cruel.’


Yet even if we did the above and returned justice for injustice, kindness for cruelty, that would be incomplete. It would be incomplete because it would only benefit ourselves. 


  AN4.95:1.1: “Mendicants, these four people are found in the world. What four?
  
  AN4.95:2.2: The person who practices to benefit neither themselves nor others...
  
  AN4.95:3.1: The person who practices to benefit others, but not themselves, is better than that.
  
  AN4.95:3.2: The person who practices to benefit themselves, but not others, is better than both of those.


Here again the Buddha teaches:


  AN4.95:3.3: But the person who practices to benefit both themselves and others is
  the foremost, best, chief, highest, and finest of the four.


From these words we can understand that we might be able to help others rebel against suffering. We can share the Noble Eightfold Path with those who will listen.


  AN2.126:1.1: “There are two conditions for the arising of right view. What two?  The words of another and proper attention.


That might be the ultimate rebellion. The rebellion against suffering.