MN26: "not even has Alaro Kalamo..." or "not only Alaro Kalamo has ..." or "Alaro Kalamo has not only..."?
Either is technically possible, I think, but only one makes sense in the context. Here eva in āḷārasseva means &quot;only&quot;, not &quot;even&quot;, since we know that āḷāra indeed has faith, etc., according to the passage prior to this:

tassa mayhaṃ, bhikkhave, etadahosi — ‘na kho āḷāro kālāmo imaṃ dhammaṃ kevalaṃ saddhāmattakena sayaṃ abhiññā sacchikatvā upasampajja viharāmīti pavedeti; addhā āḷāro kālāmo imaṃ dhammaṃ jānaṃ passaṃ viharatī’ti.
&quot;At that, monks, it came to me thus: 'not indeed by faith alone does āḷāra kālāma declare this dhamma in its entirety thus: &quot;having known for myself with higher knowledge I dwell having attained it&quot;. Indeed, āḷāra kālāma dwells having known and seen this dhamma.&quot;

So the context implies that indeed he does have the faith, etc., he's just not alone in having that faith, etc..
Also, if it was going to be &quot;but I have faith...&quot;, we would expect mayhaṃ pana rather than mayhaṃpi (mayhaṃpatthi = mayhaṃ+pi+atthi), since pi generally means &quot;and, also&quot;, and not usually &quot;but&quot;.