Why ancient Prasangika buddhist Chandrakirti claimed "There is no chariot which depends on its parts"?
This wiki page link is not a great translation and it is easy to be confused if you don't understand what is being negated/refuted by this line of reasoning: the inherent existence of a chariot. If you understand what is being negated, then
the fourth point becomes: &quot;There is no inherently existing chariot which depends on its parts&quot; and the simile often given is of a lion in the forest.