Gender and age-specific mutation rate in plants
From Whittle and Johnston (2006):


  Specifically, human epidemiological data and/or nucleotide substitution rates of selectively neutral DNA (which equals the mutation rate, Kimura, 1983; Miyata et al., 1987) have shown that more mutations occur in the male than in the female germ line for numerous animal taxa (e.g. humans, mice, chickens, and sheep) and in older rather than younger human males, patterns that each agree with the cell-division hypothesis (i.e. more DNA replications in males and in particular older males; Penrose, 1955; Risch et al., 1987; Becker et al., 1996; Moloney et al., 1996; Li, 1997; Green et al., 1999; Crow, 2000; Li et al., 2002; Makova and Li, 2002). Other data, however, have indicated that the mutation bias reported relative to gender and male age are not generally well correlated with the number of germ cell divisions and that other factors could explain these trends, such as methylation patterns, differential repair, metabolic rates, and preferential transmission of mutations to pro- geny from older males (Risch et al., 1987; Martin and Palumbi, 1993; Drost and Lee, 1995; Bromham et al., 1996; Hurst and Ellegren, 1998; Martin, 1999; Crow, 2000; Huttley et al., 2000; McVean, 2000; Sommer et al., 2001;Hebert et al., 2002; Hurst and Ellegren, 2002; Kumar and Subramanian, 2002; Li et al., 2002; Bartosch-Harlid et al., 2003).


…so basically we don't really know whether difference in gametogenesis between males and females lead to more sex and age-specific mutation rate!

However, Whittle and Johnston (2006) in reviewing many articles also show that old seeds are more likely to carry chromosomal aberration and that old individuals are more likely because of the instability of their metabolism to transmit more mutations but that would be sex independent and would not result in different gametogenesis as I was expecting in asking this question. Also the kind of mutations that become more frequent with all parents are chromosomal abnormalities or important deletion but not so much substitutions (which was also what I was interested in when asking).

Thanks @DevashishDas for finding this article. This other one was interesting as well.