Why some muscles have more tendons than others?
If you observe the general structure of the locomotor system, you will be able to roughly separate muscles in two main groups:


the muscles used for static work and position maintenance.
those exclusively used for manipulation of the external world.


You will also notice that most muscles with extensive tendinous attachments reside on the axial skeleton (i.e the trunk). This is because they are used for maintenance of the upright position, and examples of those are: Trapezius, Latissmus dorsi, Rectus abdominis, and many more... Given their static nature, they contain a lot of slow muscle fibers, allowing them to keep working over extended periods of time without rest. However, this does not make them weak. If the postural muscles were to have a structure similar to more peripheral muscles, for example biceps brachii, they would require an enormous number of different circular tendons extending in every direction to account for all the different body positions they act to maintain. To build a progressive example:


the biceps brachii is a fusiform muscle including two main parts. It is designed to pull hard in a limited range of movement types (i.e arm flexion). For that, it has evolved a small number of strong tendon attachments.
the serratus anterior was designed for a more extensive panel of moves. It therefore possesses several main bodies of muscles extending in different directions, with their own tendon attachment on the ribs.
the trapezius muscle has been designed to allow the head to keep its upright position (among other functions), and therefore is used as a positional link to guarantee the positional relation between head and shoulders. Its a static muscle and must be able to pull efficiently in a wide range of different directions, so its tendinous apparatus is extensive.


There are also special cases. If you take the digastric muscle of the neck for example, the tendons are used as attachments, but also as a kind of hinge to redirect the directional strength of the muscle.