Would constant light or fading light be registered as more wakefulness promoting by the Supra Chiasmatic Nucleus?
There is no light adaptation (such as Arrestin-mediated light adaptation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627303003908) or other negative feedback loop that attenuates melanopsin that I have ever heard of. Rodents in constant light lose behavioural circadian rhythmicity (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23714074), which could technically be due to some sort of long-term depression of melanopsin-mediated signaling, but I have always hypothesized that the rhythm disruption comes from aberrant Period gene expression in the SCN due to constant light signals stimulating its transcription via retinohypothalamic tract->SCN->cAMP->PKA activation->CREB phosphorylation->PER transcription. This paper shows the rescue of rhythms in  in VIP knockout animals using constant light (http://www.nature.com/articles/srep14044), suggesting melanopsin signaling remains intact. They also claim that light may be providing tonic input to the SCN, so they are thinking melanopsin is still intact.

In terms of light influencing the brain? That sounds very vague, as light influences the brain in many ways. How would you want to delineate light input via the visual pathway from circadian light input via the RHT? Light can produce an image on your eye, and the higher thought representation of that image could evoke an emotion or an arousal state. This would be wholly different than a circadian effect.