Can one publish ideas well before one has evidence proving the ideas work?
Generally, no.

Insights are a dime a dozen. Insights with evidence are how science (social and natural) proceed.

Proceeding through your bullets:


You mention e-journals. Have you read the "literature" in traditional journals/books/whatever the field's standard is? There's a lot of good reason to be suspicious of e-journals, so you may not have a full view of the field.
Belief in ideas doesn't make them true(r). Sorry.
Is there a reason that you think that these expansions of paradigms haven't been considered? Are you sure that they really have never occurred before?
Perhaps that's the argument for obtaining a Ph.D. or research master's --- to demonstrate that ideas have empirical heft.


If you really want to make a difference, you will have to offer evidence that your ideas work or have worked, beyond the logic you offer.