Is it possible to ask the identity of a particular reviewer to oppose for future submission?
can I ask the handling editor that we don't want this particular reviewer? 


No, because you don't know who they are, and you have no way to find out.


  can we ask the Editor of previous submission to disclose the identity of particular reviewer? 


No, definitely not.  That would be an inappropriate request.  The editor would likely suspect that you wanted their name in order to retaliate against them in some way.  The editor would surely not comply, and might form doubts about your ethics, which could affect any future interactions you might have with the editor or the journal.  

You could mention in your cover letter that you have had a problematic reviewer who said X,Y,Z, so that the editor would be forewarned.  However, I think this only helps if objections X,Y,Z are self-evidently absurd, which is probably not the case because three previous editors apparently took them seriously.  Also, it tends to draw attention to the fact that your paper has previously been rejected, which although it should not matter, may in practice bias the editor against it.

I would suggest instead:


Edit your paper to address the reviewer's objections as much as possible.  Even if their objections are completely wrong, you can clarify the paper to make it more clear that they are wrong.  "One might think that X is a problem here.  However, this is not the case, because of A."
Regarding the "related work", you need to update your paper to discuss this work.  Even if it didn't exist when you originally wrote the paper, it exists now, and when you sumbit to a new journal, it is your responsibility for your paper to properly address related work in the field as of the date of (the new) submission.  You can say something like "After our work was substantially finished, we became aware of X" in order to assert that you had priority.
Otherwise, be prepared for the possibility that you may get the same reviewer yet again.  If so, you can make the case to the editor that their objections are invalid, and ask for reconsideration.  But of course it will be up to the editor to judge.