Aftermath of rightfully submitting a solo paper without my advisor's name
I don't think your problem is with your advisor. Your real problem is with teachers in classes who say things like:


  
  No matter what you do, you have to enlist your advisor's name in your
  papers because unless it would considered as a work with no supervisor
  and it can not be trusted."
  "In interview we have for PhD students, if the person who is applying
  hasn't written the name of his suprevisor we doubt him. Either he is a
  genius or he is hiding something or he is too active in his field."
  "In some companies and research labs everyone add the name of their
  fundraiser to show him their gratitude, so should we.".
  


In light of all the recent debate about whether we are too idealized and rosy in our views of academia, let me at least say this: 

Whether or not this is common practice in the areas you work in, the problem here is the rationale being used to justify author inclusion. In no way is the decision being made based on some notion of contribution by the advisor (either financial or moral, or in any form). It's being based purely on a notion of patronage or bias. 

The person making these claims has either a very distorted view of how authorship works, or is misleading new students in a terrible way.