What is the difference between full and partial address decoding?
Memories and peripheral IC's will typically have many locations that can be selected for reading or writing; in the example above, the 2K devices (EPROM and RAM) containing 2\$^{11}\$ (2048) memory cells require 11 address bits A0 thru A10.  These are fed directly into the chip and are internally decoded to select the desired memory location or register.  These address lines are not shown in the partial schematics above.

Computer boards with external memory and peripherals connected to the processor may have several chips that need to be addressed.  Only one can be connected to the data bus of the computer at a time.  Which one is enabled is done via a chip select (CS) line.  These lines are normally inverted; i.e. the chip is enabled if the line is low (logic 0), and disabled when the line is high (logic 1).  So they are written as \$\small \overline{\text{CS}}\$ to indicate this.

With full address decoding, all the bits of the address bus that are not used to address the internal locations mentioned above are decoded to select a particular chip via its CS line. So for a 16-bit address bus (64K memory map), five lines (A11 thru A15) will be used for the chip select decode and the remaining 11 (A0 thru A10) used for the address bus fed into the chip.  The chip will respond to only as many addresses as there are internal memory locations inside the chip.  So for example, a 2K memory chip may have addresses 0x0000 thru 0x7FFF (2048 altogether) or some other 2K range; any addresses outside of the 2K addresses will have no effect.

With partial address decoding, some of the address lines which would normally be used to enable the chip select line are left unconnected as far as the address decoding goes; these are called "don't cares".  Each line that is specified as a don't care doubles the number of addresses that can select the chip.  For example, if A11 was left out of the decoding for the EPROM, it would still respond to address 0x0000 thru 0x07FF, but it would also respond to addresses 0x0800 thru 0x0FFF.  So 0x0123 and 0x0923 would address the same internal location.

Why use partial address decoding?  It sometimes saves some logic gates.  That's really the only reason.  In the example (a) above, the full addressed example (a) required a NOR gate and an inverter for the EPROM; in the second example (b) no logic was required.  However partial address decoding is usually a bad idea since it wastes space in your memory map.

The top example (a) is fully decoded; the decoding look like this:

           A15 14 13 12   11 10  9  8    7  6  5  4    3  2  1  0

 2Kx8 EPROM  0  0  0  0    0  A  A  A    A  A  A  A    A  A  A  A 

 2x8K RAM    1  0  0  0    0  A  A  A    A  A  A  A    A  A  A  A 

 PIO         1  1  1  1    1  1  1  1    1  1  1  1    1  1  A  A


The A's indicate decoding external to the CS lines, and are address bits in the case of the EPROM and RAM, or assumed to be register selects in the case of the PIO device.

The 2K devices (EPROM and RAM) require 11 address bits A0 thru A10.  The top five bits A11 thru A15 are fully decoded to enable the CS lines.  So the address range of the EPROM is 0x0000 thru 0x07FF.  The address range of the RAM is 0x8000 thru 0x87FF.

The PIO CS is selected when bits A2 thru A15 are high.  So the address range is just 0xFFFC thru 0xFFFF.

Looking at the logic equations, where \$\cdot\$ = AND, + = OR, and overbar = NOT:

\$\small CS_{EPROM}= \overline{\small A_{15}+A_{14}+A_{13}+A_{12}+A_{11}}\$ which by De Morgan's laws is the same as:

\$\small CS_{EPROM}=\overline{\small {A_{15}}}\cdot\overline{\small {A_{14}}}\cdot\overline{\small {A_{13}}}\cdot\overline{\small {A_{12}}}\cdot\overline{\small {A_{11}}}\,\,\$(i.e. CS enabled when \$\small A_{15}\$ thru \$\small A_{11}\$ are all low).

Although using a NOR to do an AND'ing function looks odd, doing it this way saved four inverters (NOR and one inverter instead of five inverters and a NAND).  But they could have used an OR instead of the NOR and gotten rid of the inverter.

\$\small CS_{RAM}\,\,\,\,\,=\overline{\small \overline{A_{15}}+A_{14}+A_{13}+A_{12}+A_{11}}\$ which is the same as:

\$\small CS_{RAM}\,\,\,\,\,=\small {A_{15}}\cdot\overline{\small {A_{14}}}\cdot\overline{\small {A_{13}}}\cdot\overline{\small {A_{12}}}\cdot\overline{\small {A_{11}}}\,\,\$(i.e. CS enabled when \$\small A_{15}\$ is high and \$\small A_{14}\$ thru \$\small A_{11}\$ are all low).

Doing it this way saved three inverters (NOR and two inverters instead of five inverters and a NAND).  But they could have used an OR instead of the NOR and gotten rid of one of the two inverters.

\$\small CS_{PIO}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,=\small \overline{\overline{A_{15}\cdot A_{14}\cdot A_{13}\cdot  A_{12}\cdot A_{11}\cdot A_{10}\cdot A_{9}\cdot A_{8}} +  \overline{A_{7}\cdot A_{6}\cdot A_{5}\cdot  A_{4}\cdot A_{3}\cdot A_{2}}}\$ which is the same as:

\$\small CS_{PIO}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,=\small A_{15}\cdot A_{14}\cdot A_{13}\cdot  A_{12}\cdot A_{11}\cdot A_{10}\cdot A_{9}\cdot A_{8}\cdot A_{7}\cdot A_{6}\cdot A_{5}\cdot  A_{4}\cdot A_{3}\cdot A_{2}\,\,\$ (i.e. CS enabled when \$\small A_{15}\$ thru \$\small A_{2}\$ are all high).

In the last case, I don't know why they didn't use two AND gates and a NAND, instead of the two NAND gates and an OR; the first would have been more straightforward.

The bottom example (b) is partially decoded; the decoding looks like this (where the x's indicate "don't care" lines -- note the top example has no x's, that's why it is considered fully decoded):

           A15 14 13 12   11 10  9  8    7  6  5  4    3  2  1  0

 2Kx8 EPROM  0  x  x  x    x  A  A  A    A  A  A  A    A  A  A  A 

 2x8K RAM    1  0  x  x    x  A  A  A    A  A  A  A    A  A  A  A 

 PIO         1  1  x  x    x  x  x  x    x  x  x  x    x  x  A  A


Once again The 2K devices (EPROM and RAM) require 11 address bits A0 thru A10.  Only the top bit is used to enable the CS line of the EPROM, and the top two bits are used to select the CS lines of the RAM and PIO.

Due to the partial decoding, the EPROM can be addressed using the following ranges 0x0000 thru 0x7FFF, or broken up into 2K blocks,

0x0000 thru 0x07FF, 0x0800 thru 0x0FFF, 0x1000 thru 0x17FF, 0x1800 thru 0x1FFF,
0x2000 thru 0x27FF, 0x2800 thru 0x2FFF, 0x3000 thru 0x37FF, 0x3800 thru 0x3FFF,
0x4000 thru 0x47FF, 0x4800 thru 0x4FFF, 0x5000 thru 0x57FF, 0x5800 thru 0x5FFF,
0x6000 thru 0x67FF, 0x6800 thru 0x6FFF, 0x7000 thru 0x77FF, 0x7800 thru 0x7FFF

The RAM is almost the same, except the high bit A15 is 1 and A14 is 0.  (A14 differentiates the RAM from the PIO, which also has the high bit set.)  It can be addressed using the following ranges 0x8000 thru 0xBFFF, or broken up into 2K blocks,

0x8000 thru 0x87FF, 0x8800 thru 0x8FFF, 0x9000 thru 0x97FF, 0x9800 thru 0x9FFF,
0xA000 thru 0xA7FF, 0xA800 thru 0xAFFF, 0xB000 thru 0xB7FF, 0xB800 thru 0xBFFF

The PIO chip is addressed with the top two address bits high.  Assuming the PIO still has only two bits of register addressing, A0 and A1, then bits A2 thru A13 are not decoded, allowing a range of 0xC000 thru 0xFFFF.  I'm not going to write out all of the ranges (they're 4096 of them), but they start out as 0xC000 thru 0xC003, and the last range is 0xFFFC thru 0xFFFF.

Looking at the logic equations, 

\$\small CS_{EPROM}=\overline{\small {A_{15}}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\$(i.e. CS enabled when \$\small A_{15}\$ is low).

\$\small CS_{RAM}\,\,\,\,\,=\small A_{15}\cdot\overline{\small {A_{14}}}\,\,\$(i.e. CS enabled when \$\small A_{15}\$ is high and \$\small A_{14}\$ is low).

\$\small CS_{PIO}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,=\small A_{15}\cdot A_{14}\,\,\$(i.e. CS enabled when \$\small A_{15}\$ and \$\small A_{14}\$ are both high).