Series vs Parallel termination load for transmission lines
I would series terminate the line assuming the receiving end is a single receiver, if its hitting multiple devices you basically have to end terminate.  

Your source resistor should be output_impedance + R = Transmission_line_impedance.  You may need to fiddle with this as your going to have to compensate for impedance changes caused by the connectors, etc.  Side note, are you sure your logic gate can drive this load?  Most can't, you may need a line driver on the sending side.

As for your pictorial end termination, its not correct.  That resistor should be as close to the receiver as possible, you should also consider Thevenin termination as it uses much less power than the parallel termination.

In general (this can vary a bit by application): 

Source Termination: Lowest power, slowest rise/fall times, single destination only.

Parallel Termination: Highest power, only 1 resistor

Thevenin Termination: Middle power, 2 resistors

Parallel AC Termination: Middle-low power, fastest rise/fall times, 1 resistor, 1 capacitor

For most signals what i would say is this:  

If its point to point and rise/fall times are not required to be especially fast (most point to point applications): source terminate

If its point to multiple point: Thevenin terminate AFTER the last device.

If rise/fall times are absolutely critical (this is fairly rarely needed): Parallel AC terminate.

If your boss is bitching about cost and your not running on batteries: Parallel terminate