How can cache be that fast?
This CPU has...


  2 cores
  A 32-KB instruction and 32-KB data first-level cache (L1) for each core


Since there are two cores, we can expect the benchmark to run two threads in parallel. Their website gives remarkably little information, though, but if we look here, CPUs with more cores seem to give correspondingly higher L1 throughputs. So I think what is displayed is total throughput with all cores working in parallel. So, for your CPU, we should divide by two for one core and one cache:

Read   93 GB/s
Write  47 GB/s
Copy   90 GB/s


Now, the fact "copy" is 2x faster than "write" is highly suspicious. How could it copy faster than it can write? I'm going to bet that what the benchmark displays as "copy" is the sum of read+write throughput, and in this case it would both read and write at 45&nbsp;GB/s, but display 90, because it's a benchmark, and who the hell trusts benchmarks? So let's ignore "copy".

Read   93 GB/s =&gt; 30 bytes/clock
Write  47 GB/s =&gt; 15 bytes/clock


Now, one 128-bit register is 16 bytes, close enough, so it sounds like this cache can do two 128-bit reads and one write per clock. 

This is exactly you'd want to really streamline those SSE number-crunching instructions: two reads and one write per cycle.

This would most likely be implemented with lots of parallel data lines, which is the usual way to haul around lots of data very fast inside a chip.