Using DC voltage instead of AC to supply SMPS
I have practical experience with PC power supplies. Pretty much any modern ATX PSU contains a main section (that delivers full horsepower when the PSU is on) and a tiny section to deliver +5VSB. In a decent PSU, both are SMPS, i.e. do not contain a classic iron-core AC-only transformer (which would surely blow if fed by DC mains).

There are still some cheap ATX power supplies on the market, that do not contain a proper SMPS-based PFC stage, or use a so-called "passive" PFC, which is essentially an inductor in series... PSU's with a passive PFC typically have a switch to be configured for 120 vs. 240 V AC, or (here in Europe) are "240 V only", with a modest margin of tolerance. For the purposes of DC operation, I do not like the cheap variety very much - not exactly sure what to expect from the hefty inductor at the input on transient events (power on/off - probably not much risk but you'd better watch out) and also because my customers typically have a DC mains rail that's "somewhere inbetween", such as 250 V DC. 

As you have mentioned, the direct-rectified peak voltages are about 340 V DC derived from 240V AC, or 170 V DC derived from 120 V AC (the ratio being a square root of 2). Thus, 250V DC is probably too low for a PSU specified at 240 V AC (= 340 V DC). The PSU would either refuse to run, or might risk heat overload of the primary (due to too much current flowing in, to compensate for the lower voltage). This latter risk depends a lot on actual load attached to the secondary side.

PSU's with active PFC typically have a wide input range specified, such as 100 - 240 V AC (140 to 340 V sinewave peak). This is because the SMPS PFC stage actually works as a boost converter, with a relatively small capacitor on its input, following the sinewave, and upconverting any voltage you give it to some 400 V DC in the PSU's main primary capacitor - for the main down-converting stage to have a "nice level playground". 

The 140V DC minimum at the PFC stage's input is actually debatable. The PFC stage uses a special circuit, regulating its current draft to follow the input 
"rectified sinewave" waveform. I guess it's called a "current mirror", which sounds more like something from the "op-amp internals" nomenclature (see also "long-tailed pair"), rather than a term specific to PFC controllers... either way, this circuit modulates the PWM to make the current draft fluctuate in sync with input voltage, to mimick a resistive load... and if the input voltage is perfectly constant, this should result in a perfectly constant current draft, right? Back to the 140 V DC minimum (for 100 V AC): consider, that at 100 V AC, the PFC "current mirror" still strives to follow the sinewave, so it actually works from much lower voltages. And, at 100 V AC (140 V peak) = at the corresponding current (some sinusoidal Ief) it still has bearable losses = heat dissipation. Arguably, if fed by DC voltage, a similar level of loss and heat can be obtained at 100 V DC, rather than 140 V DC, agreed? 

The one point you may be somewhat doubtful about, is the input Graetz bridge, which will be stressed in a half of the diodes only - but this is typically no problem.

One somewhat subtle issue remains: inrush limiting. AFAICT, even the modern PFC-equipped PSU's actually suffer from the power-on inrush when the big primary cap is getting charged (= with an ATX PSU, this happens when you plug the mains cable in, rather then when you push the PC's power-on button). The PFC stage's boost topology alone doesn't contain any inrush limiting device (except maybe for the choke, but that's relatively small). If the PSU is equipped with an NTC for inrush limit, it will probably work fine for DC as well. If the PSU contains a thyristor-based (PWM-based) inrush soft-starter, that would be a problem, as the PSU would either not work at all, or the thyristors would not switch off, and there would be a hell of an inrush :-) You are probably not likely to meet thyristors in the input Graetz in a PSU on the order of 400 W or thereabouts.

Inrush pulse limiting is a pain even at lower-volt (&lt; 50 V) DC mains rails - a problem that hardly anyone cares to address, until it comes back to bite them...

As for overcurrent safety: people working with higher-volt DC in their automation gear (some railway and substation folks) typically use special models of circuit breakers that are specified for DC operation at the desired voltage. They look very much like your normal AC circuit breakers on the DIN rail, except that they have the special property that they can disconnect
a DC current. Up to a certain level of current and voltage, anyway. See also "circuit breaker selectivity".

Overall, I myself would be very afraid of the DC voltage, should you ever touch a bare wire by mistake. Once you get caught, it won't let you go. Not very good for household use.