Criteria for evaluating cognitive systems
Hofstadter provides a detailed set of criteria in Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies.  Some of his criteria that I do not see mentioned above concern the flow of information-processing:  whether or not the model evaluated flows through possibility space in a psychologically plausible way, and how to measure that.

For instance...  Suppose the following: "A bat and a ball cost usd110. The bat costs usd100 more than the ball. How much is the ball?" 

Now, cognitive psychology has shown that people are primed to say "the ball costs usd10." Which is wrong! A good cognitive model should also "think" usd10, before considering usd5. Otherwise, it doesn't respect information-processing flow.

He also mentions, metaphorically, the idea of including "lesions" in the model, such that, if some component of the model is "lesioned", the expected outcome from that component should drastically change.