01 Matrix is too slow when solved using DFS
The algorithm is slow since it creates paths in all 4 directions at
each step. The algorithm is also using recursion, which is also slower
than a simple for loop.
Consider a 5x5 matrix A:
[[1 1 1 1 0]
 [1 1 1 1 1]
 [1 1 1 1 1]
 [1 0 1 1 1]
 [1 1 1 1 1]]

to find the distance of the top-left cell, the algorithm first moves
down, then up, then right, and then left. It marks the cells it has
already visited by a -1 to avoid infinite loops. So the first five
steps will move down:
[[-1  1 1 1 0]
 [-1  1 1 1 1]
 [-1  1 1 1 1]
 [-1  0 1 1 1]
 [-1  1 1 1 1]]

now the algorithm cannot move further down since it has reached the
maximum row number, and it tries to move in the next direction which
is upwards. Here, it encounters a -1 and gives up on that direction since
a -1 indicates that it has already visited that cell. Now it tries to
move to the right instead:
[[-1  1  1  1  0]
 [-1  1  1  1  1]
 [-1  1  1  1  1]
 [-1  0  1  1  1]
 [-1 -1  1  1  1]]

In cell A(4,1) (i.e. bottom row, second column) it does the same
checks and finds that it cannot move down, then it tries to move
upwards and encounters a 0 in cell A(3,1). At this point,
we are 6 levels deep into the recursion and the distance from
A(0,0) to A(3,1) is hence found to be 6 for now. So ideally the algorithm should now reject any further paths that exceeds 6 levels of
recursion. Unfortunately this is not the case; first the algorithm steps
back to recursion level 5 in cell A(4,1) and continues with cell
A(4,2):
[[-1  1  1  1  0]
 [-1  1  1  1  1]
 [-1  1  1  1  1]
 [-1  0  1  1  1]
 [-1 -1 -1  1  1]]

from this cell it moves upwards all the way up to cell A(0,2):
[[-1  1 -1  1  0]
 [-1  1 -1  1  1]
 [-1  1 -1  1  1]
 [-1  0 -1  1  1]
 [-1 -1 -1  1  1]]

reaches a recursion level of 11. Here it can move either to the right or
to the left. Since the algorithm always tries right before left, it
moves to cell A(0,3) and then continues downward to cell A(4,3) :
[[-1  1 -1 -1  0]
 [-1  1 -1 -1  1]
 [-1  1 -1 -1  1]
 [-1  0 -1 -1  1]
 [-1 -1 -1 -1  1]]

The recursion level is now 16. Then it moves to right to cell A(4,4) and
then upwards to cell A(0,4).
[[-1  1 -1 -1  0]
 [-1  1 -1 -1 -1]
 [-1  1 -1 -1 -1]
 [-1  0 -1 -1 -1]
 [-1 -1 -1 -1 -1]]

The recursion level is now 21. A zero is
finally found in cell A(0,4) indicating a distance of 21 from cell
A(0,0). Still, the
algorithm continues to investigate useless paths (that is: paths
with recursion level more that 6 (remember that we have already found
a zero at distance 6) and moves back to cell A(1,4) at recursion
level 20. Here it tries the remaining directions (left and right) but
none of those works, so level 20 is done. Then it enters back into
level 19, 18, 17, 16, 15:
[[-1  1 -1 -1  0]
 [-1  1 -1 -1  1]
 [-1  1 -1 -1  1]
 [-1  0 -1 -1  1]
 [-1 -1 -1  1  1]]

notice that it replaces the -1 with 1 as it completes a level. So now
A(1,4), A(2,4), A(3,4), A(4,4), and A(4,3) are all reset to value 1. At
level 15, i.e. cell A(3,3), it has already tried to move down, so now
it tries to move up, but that does not work since cell A(3,2) has a
-1. Then it tries to move to the right, to cell A(3,4), which works
since A(3,4) is now 1 (and not -1). From cell A(3,4) it first tries to
move down and reaches cell A(4,4). From that cell the only alternative
is to move left and at recursion level 17 it reaches cell A(4,3):
[[-1  1 -1 -1  0]
 [-1  1 -1 -1  1]
 [-1  1 -1 -1  1]
 [-1  0 -1 -1 -1]
 [-1 -1 -1  1 -1]]

In this cell it cannot get further, there is a -1 in all directions,
and it gives up on level 17, (and moves back to level ...).
The procedure should be clear by now. I will not continue further with
this example, the point was just to
illustrate why the algorithm is so slow.
In fact, in order to find the distance for A(0,0) in this 5x5
matrix example it executes a whopping 22254 (!) calls to the recursive dfs() method.
This simply to determine that the distance is 4 (which btw is found easily
by moving horizontally to the zero in cell A(0,4)).
I think it is a fair guess that the algorithm has an exponential complexity. And it should take forever to run cases with more than say 100 cells (i.e. a 10x10
matrix).
Finally, here is an example of a much faster algorithm that should be
able to find a solution for a 100x100 matrix in a fraction of a second:
import numpy as np

class Solution:
    &quot;&quot;&quot; Solution to leetCode problem 542. 01 Matrix
    Given a matrix consisting of 0 and 1, find the distance of the
    nearest 0 for each cell. The distance between two adjacent cells is 1.
    &quot;&quot;&quot;
    def __init__(self, A):
        self.A = A

    def get_dist(self):
        &quot;&quot;&quot; Get the distance matrix for self.A as defined in the
        problem statement for problem 542. 01.
        &quot;&quot;&quot;
        A = self.A
        (N, M) = A.shape
        B = np.zeros(A.shape, dtype=int)
        for i in range(N):
            for j in range(M):
                if A[i,j] == 1:  # if A[i,j] == 0, B[i,j] is already set to 0
                    dist = 1
                    found = False
                    while not found:
                        for (x,y) in self.points(i, j, dist):
                            if A[x,y] == 0:
                                B[i,j] = dist
                                found = True
                                break
                        if not found:
                            dist = dist + 1
                            if dist &gt; M+N:
                                raise Exception('Unexpected')
        return B

    def points(self, i, j, dist):
        &quot;&quot;&quot; Generate all valid points a distance 'dist' away from (i,j)
        The valid points will lie on the edge of a diamond centered on
        (i,j). Use a generator to avoid computing unecessary points.
        &quot;&quot;&quot;
        (N, M) = self.A.shape
        for k in range(dist):
            if (i+k &lt; N) and (j-dist+k &gt;= 0):
                yield (i+k, j-dist+k)
            if (i+dist-k &lt; N) and (j+k &lt; M):
                yield (i+dist-k, j+k)
            if (i-k &gt;= 0) and (j+dist-k &lt; M):
                yield (i-k, j+dist-k)
            if (i-dist+k &gt;= 0) and (j-k &gt;= 0):
                yield (i-dist+k, j-k)