Given a sequence of words, print all anagrams together
FiHopZz, your concept seems fine.   A few comments:


in general, don't typedef pointers. It is confusing.
your functions are not const-correct. In other words they cast const values
to non-const values.  The compiler will warn you of this if you enable
warnings.
I prefer pointers to be declared like this: char *p, not char* p.
Consider char* a, b if in doubt (b is not a pointer but looks as if it
should be).
all local functions should be declared static
print_anagrams_together should take a const word array and a size_t size
(destroy should also take size_t not int)
don't cast the return from malloc and note that malloc can fail.
sizeof(char) is 1 by definition.
use strdup to copy a word, not malloc.  strdup can also fail.
you took the length of the string twice, once in the malloc call and once
in the qsort call.
you also used strcpy on a string of which you already knew the
length. memcpy is better (but remember to copy length+1).
print_anagrams_together is arguably better broken into several
sub-functions: copy_words, sort_words, print_words.  Well done for making
destroy as function.  This  would be renamed destroy_words for symmetry.
arguably, copy_words and sort_words above could be combined.  This is how
your loop is written, with a word copied and then sorted in the same loop.
This is clearly slightly more efficient, but in some way it does not appeal
to me.  For a start what do you call it? - copy_and_sort_words is rather
ugly. But also a copy_words that just duplicates the array is easily tested;
one that duplicates it and modifies it is not.  These are perhaps not
considerations that belong to a simple program such as this, but they are
worth beaaring in mind for more complicated tasks.
comments should be useful. Yours are mainly noise.  If nothing needs
saying, say nothing.
the word array in main should be const
the size in main should be const size_t, not int
main should have a parameter list


Don't take my comments on breaking your print_anagrams_together into separate
functions too seriously. It is not a big function and it is easily understood.
Breaking it apart would probably make the program worse.  However, for bigger
or more complicated applications, having several loops in the same function
in my opinion often indicates a lack of proper subdivision.  Just my opinion
though and others may differ.

Note also that although I say that malloc/strdup can fail, they are of course
unlikely to fail in a small program like this.  You might say that it is
pointless testing for NULL pointers when you know they will probably be okay.
The only thing you can sensibly do is to print an error and exit anyway
(perror("malloc"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE);).  But it is a good discipline always
to check the return values of functions that can fail.  Just do it.