Project Euler problem #14 (longest Collatz chain) in Swift
Some suggestion to improve your code:


The global variables max and originalNum should be named differently to match their purpose, possibly with explaining comments.
The global variable x is used to keep track of the length of the current Collatz chain, this is better done by making the function return a value. That also allows to eliminate the second
originalNumber parameter.
collatzFunc() should just compute the Collatz chain length for a 
given number, and the caller of that function should compare that with previously computed values.
Why assign var num = number if that value is then overwritten? 
You can simplify that to

let num = number % 2 == 0 ? number / 2 : 3 * number + 1

The indenting is not always correct, and the spacing is not
consistent (e.g. always put a space before opening curly braces).
The challenge asks for a number below 1 million, therefore the
loop must be

for number in 1..&lt;1000000 { ... }


and the singular form number is more appropriate here.


Putting it all together, this is how I would modify your code:

/// Compute the length of the Collatz chain starting at `number`.
func collatzFunc(number: Int) -&gt; Int {
    if number == 1 {
        return 1
    }
    return 1 + collatzFunc(number: number % 2 == 0 ? number / 2 : 3 * number + 1)
}

var maxLength = 0 // Maximal length of Collatz chain found so far.
var maxNumber = 0 // Number for which this length is achieved.

for number in 1 ..&lt; 1_000_000 {
    let length = collatzFunc(number: number)
    if length &gt; maxLength {
        maxLength = length
        maxNumber = number
    }
}

print(maxNumber)


This is perhaps not faster than your version, but definitely better to read and therefore better to maintain.

You can also replace the recursive function by an iterative version

/// Compute the length of the Collatz chain starting at `number`.
func collatzFunc(number: Int) -&gt; Int {
    var length = 1
    var num = number
    while num != 1 {
        num = num % 2 == 0 ? num / 2 : 3 * num + 1
        length += 1
    }
    return length
}


and check if that performs better.

As already mentioned in the comments, caching (or memoization)
increases the performance dramatically. You'll find some caching
solutions in the various answers to
Project Euler problem 14 (longest Collatz sequence) in Swift 3.
Here is a version using an array to cache all results for 
number up to a certain limit, this turned out to be quite fast:

var cache = [Int](repeating: 0, count: 1_000_000)
cache[1] = 1

func collatzFunc(number: Int) -&gt; Int {
    if number &lt; cache.count &amp;&amp; cache[number] &gt; 0 {
        return cache[number]
    }
    let length = 1 + collatzFunc(number: number % 2 == 0 ? number / 2 : 3 * number + 1)
    if number &lt; cache.count {
        cache[number] = length
    }
    return length
}