Recommendations for textbooks with correct and up-to-date information
I disagree with the idea to forget about Lewis formulae because of their age. If you browse across the table of contents of scientific journals, however, you see Lewis formualae are widely used.  From the first December issue of Organic Letters, for example is taken the following screen photo:



If Lewis formulae were so off and wrong, chemists would use other forms to describe molecular structures in their publications.  As so often, however, it is a question about what you want to describe, and to know what limitations of the tools at disposition inheritated.
By convention (and training), for example, chemists do not read the rings in formula about nitronaphthalene (on the left) as an alternation of isolated single- and double bonds, but conceptionalize this as to depict aromatic systems.  Counting electrons, for example, this is easier this way as with the Thiele ring which accentuates the delocalization of the $\pi$-electrons.*)



(source)

So it is better to recognize where Lewis formulae may be misleading, with some instances listed e.g., here, and some you will encounter in study, e.g. diborane



(source)

It equally is helpful to know that dashes in formulae, depending on convention, may represent different aspects:



(source)

*) In 1899, Thiele's perspective was to emphasize that benzene's molecular structure is between the two mesomeric structures expressed as Kekulé-structure and thus used the (initially dashed) cricle in the structural formula.  Chemists' perspective of delocalization of $\pi$-electrons today obviously is influenced by quantum physics.