What is the difference between configuration and conformation in stereochemistry?
I recommend you this webpage: http://worldofbiochemistry.blogspot.com/2012/09/conformation-vs-configuration.html.
Configuration and conformation are two concepts are often used interchangeably, but represent very different things. The conformation regards the relative spatial orientation of a portion of a molecule relative to another. Thus, it is an aspect that is not directly related to the covalent bonds that are established within the molecule, but with their possible rotation.



When we talk about rotation around covalent bonds, we are only referring to the single bonds, as they are the only ones that can suffer rotation. Basically this concept is easily understood if we think that the bounds work as an axis...

It should be noted that when we speak of different conformations, it does not necessarily involve all the covalent bonds of a molecule, it can account only for one or few of them.
 Taken together, it is possible to convert one conformation to another without cleaving or forming chemical bonds, simply by rotating some simple covalent bonds. Thermal energy at room temperature is sufficient to rotate some simple covalent bonds.

The configuration is a concept that is related to the order by which different substituents linked to the same central atom establish covalent bonds. That means, in this case it is clearly an aspect that is a direct consequence of the covalent backbone of molecules.



To change the configuration, you must always cleave and form new covalent bonds...This costs a lot of energy!!

In conclusion, the concept conformation encompasses portions of a molecule which are not directly linked to the same atom and do not involve the covalent backbone of the molecules, while the configuration comprehends parts of the molecule which are bound to the same atom, which means that there is a direct involvement of the covalent bounds of the molecule.