Is the smartest robot more clever than the stupidest human?
First Question

To treat this question in a scientific way, because I think it is a reasonable enough question that draws on the realities of postmodern culture in post industrialized societies to be treated scientifically, we should define some things.

The most difficult is intelligence, which is the realm in which smartness, cleverness, and stupidity reside.

Let's go through the list.


Most humans are not good at chess, but humans invented the game.
Most humans can't write symphonies, but humans invented them.
Most humans don't read novels, but digital computers can't write them yet and can't learn ethical balance through the reading of them like humans can.
Most humans are not Olympic level athletes, yet humans developed Olympics and robots are not yet Olympiads.
Most humans (whether or hot they are good at logical reasoning) don't employ it much other than to, "Get by."


The question is fine until it devolves into the dismissal of the intelligence that people apply to their method of earning income, which for many if not most people requires more than just getting up, commuting in, following some simple instructions, and going to sleep mildly inebriated.  Let's replace this last part with this.


Most humans do not work with the intention of optimizing quality of the product or service by measuring their own quality and seeking educational resources to improve the velocity, reliability, or accuracy of their work output (unless programs are instituted to incentivize these things in the workplace.)


If we define intelligence as the union of these things, for simplicity's sake, we have this (which is subject to change as AI develops).


Playing chess: AI wins
Designing games: Humans win
Writing symphonies: Humans win
Writing novels: Humans win
Absorbing ethics from stories: Humans win
Olympic gold: Humans win
Logical consistency: AI wins


We must, to interpret the above list correctly concede two things:


Machines may have the ability to do something according to specific quality standards but not be configured, trained, or connected appropriately to prevail.
Humans may have the ability to do something according to specific quality standards but not be educated, trained, or be properly motivated to prevail.


Second Question

What are some things that a clever robot can't do that a stupid human can?  These are a few, but they are of particular importance from certain perspectives.


Love their family and friends
Have compassion without reason
Decide what to learn
Hunt
See a future danger approaching
Entertain others
Pray


I would not dismiss these human propensities as irrelevant, even from a scientific perspective.  I would also not dismiss the possibility that these things are beyond the capabilities of silicon based entities.