Growth of polar vortices vs projective geometry; what does this figure mean?
I suspect that this diagram has nothing to do with polar vortices in the meteorological sense. It’s hard to prove a negative, but digging into the source of this image led me in some very non-meteorological directions.

The file itself is entitled ‘Growth measure and vortices’ on Wikimedia (note absence of ‘polar’), with a source of ‘own work’ (by the user ‘Snowy Weather’) and the description ‘Projective geometry block in a Waldorf high school’.

Apart from the ‘Projective geometry’ page, the only Wikipedia page using this image is the one on Waldorf education, where it’s described as ‘Student work from a projective geometry block in a Waldorf high school’. The image was added to both the projective geometry article and the Waldorf article by the same user (not the original uploader of the image), who doesn't seem to have any background in meteorology. This makes me suspect that the ‘polar’ may have been added in error.

On the ‘Projective geometry’ page, the image is described as being ‘based on the work of Lawrence Edwards’. Almost certainly, this must refer to Edwards’ book Projective Geometry, which seems from the reviews to be rather esoteric:


‘The reason why modern materialists are unable to understand anything of a spiritual nature is that their ways of thinking, based purely upon sense perception, are much too rigid. Books such as this can help loosen such rigidity.’
‘… some of the terms that Edwards uses (e.g. "breathing involution") may actually be his own creation… and this made cross-referencing the book with other projective geometry texts a little harder.’


The same author has written a book entitled The Vortex of Life – again, not related to meteorology – suggesting to me that he may be quite keen on the word ‘vortex’, perhaps in a broader or more unusual sense than one might find in the mainstream of scientific literature.

In short: the word ‘polar’ may or may not have been added in error by a Wikipedia editor, but in either case I am fairly confident that the ‘polar vortices’ referred to here have nothing to do with meteorology.