Question mark on Correlation Matrix with RapidMiner
All your data is non-numeric, so there is no straightforward method to compute a correlation value. It appears that the software does compute a correlation value between 2-valued fields (breast and irradiat).

You will have to work on your data if you want to compute the full correlation matrix:


Make fields with numeric values numeric. For instance, the 6th field seems to be numeric data encoded as strings (make sure those are not numbered categories that cannot be ordered, otherwise the correlation will mean nothing)
Give numeric values to ordered categories. For instance, for the age field, you could certainly use a centered numeric value for each category (45 instead of 40-49, 55 instead of 50-59, etc.), or just a rank.
Ignore rows with no data. For instance, in the 5th field, you have binary results (yes/no) and appear to have a few question marks. Removing the lines with question marks will make the field 2-valued, something that appears to allow the software to compute the correlation.


For the rest of the fields, there is no magic trick, unfortunately. You may want to one-hot-encode them, but interpreting the results will be more complicated. There are also ways to test categorical fields independence, but that's a different measure: see this post.