Women nationwide are denouncing Donald Trump. Conservative Marybeth Glenn is furious that men aren’t following suit—and she has a message for them. 
 
 Marybeth Glenn describes herself as a Coolidge Conservative who is addicted to politics, Christian apologetics, C.S. Lewis, Ray Bradbury, Ravi Zacharias, and Phil Collins. She typically votes Republican, “rejects increasing government control, and will gladly rebuke either side of the aisle when they become power hungry.” 
 
 Presently, she is among the women all over America who’ve fled Donald Trump’s campaign: 
 
 Here's what the map would look line if only women voted: https://t.co/sjVY67qouE pic.twitter.com/rrc3GuXmGl — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) October 11, 2016 
 
 Earlier this week, on Twitter, she told her followers why she’s fed up with Republican men who refuse to follow her out the door. Her tweetstorm went viral and attracted kind words from Senator Lindsey Graham and third party candidate Evan McMullin. It was also excerpted at The Weekly Standard. It’s worth your attention, too. See her series of 17 tweets starting here. ||||| The theme of President Barack Obama's State of the Union Address Tuesday night was "winning the future." It also could have been labeled, "winning the center." 
 
 The speech was designed to show that Mr. Obama, just two months after suffering deep bruises in the midterm election, has a grasp of what a previous president called the vision thing. With its talk of investing in education, basic research and new technologies, the address marked a conscious effort to end the phase of his presidency focused on getting the country out of its economic mess, and to move on to a search for what is beyond the mess. 
 
 President Obama stuck to broad values such as innovation and making sure American business can succeed, in his State of the Union Address. WSJ's Sudeep Reddy joins Kelly Evans and Jerry Seib for analysis of the president's speech. 
 
 {if djIsFlashPossible} The version of Adobe Flash Player required to view this interactive has not been found. To enjoy our complete interactive experience, please download a free copy of the latest version of Adobe Flash Player here {else} {else} This content can not be displayed because your browser does not support the Adobe Flash player required to view it. {/if} {/if} 
 
 Yet the vision he sketched out isn't likely to win over skeptics on the right. They think his talk of cutting spending in some areas is more than trumped by his desire to spend more in other areas. And they already doubt his new pledges to ratchet back regulation. 
 
 Nor will the Obama vision be entirely pleasing to his friends on the left, who will be puzzled by his sudden interest in cutting the corporate tax rate and disturbed by the spending cuts they know are coming. "I'm sure there will be plenty of unhappiness about that," a senior Obama aide said just before the speech. 
 
 Obama Addresses the Nation View Slideshow Agence France-Presse/Getty Images President Obama was applauded by Vice President Joe Biden and House Speaker John Boehner prior to delivering his State of the Union address. 
 
 Instead, it is a vision designed to be clear and attractive to the broad center of the country—the place where Mr. Obama and his party suffered the most grievous losses over the past two years. Indeed, the State of the Union was the best illustration yet of how the post-election Barack Obama has repositioned himself. 
 
 To those independent voters who abandoned him in November, and to those disillusioned admirers who had begun to doubt that he actually represented the post-partisan leader advertised in 2008, Mr. Obama sketched out a kind of grand political bargain to move the government and the nation in the direction he wants. 
 
 He gave ground to the right and to the business community by offering to reduce a corporate tax rate that he said is holding down American competitiveness. He offered new ways to address conservatives' concerns about medical-malpractice lawsuits. And he offered a shout-out to those who think he has spent recklessly by extending his previous call for a three-year freeze on discretionary domestic spending to five years. 
 
 In return, though, he said he would seek funds to realize his vision of a future where the federal government is active rather than passive in the task of shaping America's economy through education, research and infrastructure spending. The image he summoned to describe this view—the challenge posed by the Soviet Union's Sputnik space launch half a century ago—was meant to recall a time when the government, in a role embraced by a broad swath of Americans, unabashedly led the country in meeting a challenge that seemed almost existential at the time. 
 
 "Half a century ago, when the Soviets beat us into space with the launch of a satellite called Sputnik, we had no idea how we'd beat them to the moon," Mr. Obama said. "The science wasn't there yet. NASA didn't even exist." 
 
 But by "investing in better research and education," the U.S. beat the Soviets to the moon. "This," Mr. Obama declared, "is our generation's Sputnik moment." 
 
 The State of the Union Is... Pick the words that you think best complete the president's sentences. View Interactive Speech Patterns Review the main topics and words used in President Obama's address this year and compare with 2009 and 2010. View Interactive 
 
 Take out the words "Soviet Union" and substitute "China," and replace the description of a race to the moon with a race to protect American economic pre-eminence, and you get the picture Mr. Obama was seeking to convey. 
 
 Above all, the president sought to draw a parallel today to the way in which that race to the moon was won: through a partnership between government and private business, one that was well funded thanks to broad support in the center of the taxpaying public. Implicit in the image is the assertion that Republicans won't undertake a similar mission to win the economic race today. 
 
 Is that a vision the American center can be inspired to embrace today, as it did amid the Cold War? That's the Obama calculation. "What is palpable out there is a desire for a sense about the future," one senior Obama adviser says. 
 
 At the same time, the differences between now and the Sputnik era are significant as well. The government had ample resources then, and sags under deficits now. Trust in government was high then, but has plummeted since. 
 
 Perhaps more important, for many Americans the economic future takes a back seat to lingering fears of the economic present. Many of them are likely to judge the president, as well as his Republican counterparts, above all on how many jobs they can create here and now. 
 
 Write to Gerald F. Seib at jerry.seib@wsj.com
– President Obama's second State of the Union address probably won't win over many critics from the left or right, but he did an impressive—at times even Reaganesque—job of pitching to the center, pundits say. "The point wasn't soaring rhetoric or soothing the nation," notes Joshua Green at the Atlantic. The speech seem designed to recast the president's image "as someone who has finally gotten the message that he should be focused on jobs, jobs, jobs." The speech didn't soar, but it charted "ways to get over, under, around and through some of the roadblocks that stand in the way of Obama's policy proposals" on energy, education, and infrastructure," writes Eugene Robinson at the Washington Post. The substance of the speech was "moderate liberalism—we like business, but government has a role, too," writes Jonathan Chait at the New Republic. Obama, he decides, set out his vision of American unity more clearly than he's done before. The theme of the address was "winning the future," but "It also could have been labeled, "winning the center," writes Gerald F. Seib at the Wall Street Journal. The speech, with its focus on the future beyond the economic mess, was "the best illustration yet of how the post-election Barack Obama has repositioned himself" to win back voters who abandoned him in November, he writes.