Lawmakers who had an affair continue their fight, this time in court 
 
 Former state Reps. Todd Courser and Cindy Gamrat (Photo: Michigan House of Representatives) 
 
 LANSING — Former state Reps. Todd Courser and Cindy Gamrat have filed a notice with the Michigan Court of Claims that they could sue the state and others to recoup more than $500,000 for lost wages and compensatory damages for psychological and emotional distress related to their removal from office. 
 
 The notice isn’t an actual lawsuit against the state and individuals associated with the proceedings that led to the Republican lawmakers leaving office on Sept. 11 — Courser of Lapeer resigned and Gamrat of Plainwell was expelled. . But the notice came last month to comply with the six-month statute of limitations on lawsuits against the state. 
 
 “The claim will be filed in federal court,” the notice stated, adding that the actions taken that led to them leaving office were unconstitutional. 
 
 Courser and Gamrat were caught in a sex scandal and bizarre cover-up in which Courser sent an anonymous e-mail last year claiming that he was a sexual deviant who paid for sex with men outside bars in Lansing. The intent was to make it appear that the pair were victims of a smear campaign and to make it so that any news of their affair would pale in comparison to the manufactured tale in the e-mail. 
 
 As a result of the affair and the lawmakers’ attempt to use staffers to help cover-up the indiscretion, the House of Representatives held hearings and voted to expel Gamrat. Courser resigned before a vote to expel him could be taken. 
 
 In the notice of intent to sue, Courser and Gamrat said they intend to file suit against the Michigan House of Representatives; Speaker of the House Kevin Cotter, R-Mt. Pleasant; three of their former staffers, Keith Allard, Ben Graham and Joshua Cline; Tim Bowlin, the director of the House Business Office; Brock Swartzle, legal counsel to House Republicans; Norm Saari, former chief of staff to Cotter; David Horr, a person who investigators have identified as the sender of anonymous text messages calling on Courser to resign his seat, and Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette. 
 
 “These actions occurred in violation of claimants’ civil rights under the United States Constitution and the Michigan Constitution,” the notice reads, citing alleged violations of due process, equal protection, double jeopardy, unlawful search and seizure and deprivation of salary. 
 
 The notice said that Courser and Gamrat were never given their Miranda rights, allowed to subpoena witnesses, testimony or to examine witnesses during the hearings that led to them leaving office and that they were the victims of illegal wiretapping and eavesdropping. 
 
 Those actions were politically motivated, the notice said, because the Republican leadership wanted to kick them out of office before they voted on a roads package that they both opposed. 
 
 It’s just the latest legal action in the tangled case of the former lawmakers. Allard and Graham have file lawsuits against Courser and Gamrat in state and federal courts, claiming that they were unlawfully fired after they blew the whistle on their bosses. 
 
 And Schuette has filed felony criminal charges against both Courser and Gamrat for lying under oath, misconduct in office and asking staffers to forge their signatures on official “blue backs,” the documents filed when proposed legislation is introduced. 
 
 Messages were left for Courser. Gamrat referred questions to her attorney. Her attorney, Robert Baker, told the Free Press late Wednesday that his client will definitely file a federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court. 
 
 Contact Kathleen Gray: 313-223-4430, kgray99@freepress.com or on Twitter @michpoligal 
 
 Read or Share this story: http://on.freep.com/1RYG9vN ||||| Former state Reps. Todd Courser and Cindy Gamrat (Photo: Detroit News) 
 
 Lansing — Former state Reps. Todd Courser and Cindy Gamrat are fighting back against a civil lawsuit and criminal charges by threatening to sue the Michigan House of Representatives. 
 
 Courser and Gamrat last month filed a document in the Michigan Court of Claims attempting to preserve their ability to sue the House, Speaker Kevin Cotter and their former aides for damages exceeding $500,000, arguing the potential defendants engaged in a “conspiracy” to end their political careers. 
 
 The notice of intent claims the GOP-controlled House “falsely imprisoned” and “falsely arrested” the former legislators during a marathon 16-hour session that ended in the early hours of Sept. 11. Gamrat, a Plainwell Republican, was ousted in a House vote, while Lapeer-area Republican Courser resigned over a failed cover-up of their extramarital affair. 
 
 Courser and Gamrat’s joint notice was filed March 10 — within the six-month statute of limitations for suing the House. It came before Courser’s attorney late last week started issuing broad subpoenas to those involved in the expulsion hearings. 
 
 “It was to put them on notice,” Courser told The Detroit News. He declined to confirm whether he and Gamrat plan to follow through and sue the state. 
 
 “Obviously, there was enough done wrong, during the whole of the expulsion proceedings, and also the various players who are so intimately connected,” he said. 
 
 Robert J. Baker, an Allegan attorney representing Gamrat, said the filing leaves options open for his client. 
 
 Baker declined to elaborate on the legal argument that Gamrat and Courser were “imprisoned” in the House chamber during the expulsion proceedings. 
 
 “You’ll have to wait until we file our pleadings. It will all be there in great detail,” Baker told The Detroit News. 
 
 The notice of intent accuses Cotter, R-Mount Pleasant, and his top aides as well as Courser and Gamrat’s former aides Keith Allard, Ben Graham and Joshua Cline of an elaborate scheme that violated the two representatives’ civil rights under the U.S. and Michigan constitutions. 
 
 Ex-reps outline ‘conspiracy’ 
 
 The court filing adds to Courser and Gamrat’s public suggestions that they were booted from office to help legislative Republicans last fall pass a $1.2 billion road funding package that included tax and vehicle registration increases. Their empty seats lowered the minimum threshold for passing the tax and fee hikes. 
 
 “This conspiracy related to the Tier 1 Defendants’ desire to pass certain legislation (namely Proposal 15-1 and the House Roads Package) and their desire to remove Claimants from the House of Representatives for their own political and financial gain,” the filing alleges. 
 
 Courser and Gamrat claim they were the victims of “undercover surveillance operations, illegal wiretapping and eavesdropping, extortion, secret meetings, threats and intimidation, identity theft, invasion of privacy and hacking.” 
 
 The notice of intent also names Port Huron resident David Horr as a potential defendant, should the pair decide to file suit. 
 
 Horr was the co-worker and friend of Gamrat’s husband, Joe Gamrat, who bought a disposable cellphone and sent anonymous text messages to Cindy Gamrat and Todd Courser. 
 
 A Michigan State Police investigation concluded that Horr sent the text messages threatening to expose the affair at the behest of Joe Gamrat in a bid to get his wife away from Courser. 
 
 The Lapeer County prosecutor declined to charge Horr and Joe Gamrat with crimes in the matter, citing potential jury sympathy for the husband trying to end his wife’s affair. 
 
 The complaint does not name Joe Gamrat as a defendant. 
 
 Potential defendants named 
 
 In addition to Cotter, his Chief of Staff Brock Swartzle, former Chief of Staff Norm Saari and House Business Office Director Tim Bowlin are all named as potential defendants in the complaint. 
 
 “We don’t comment about ongoing litigation,” Cotter spokesman Gideon D’Assandro said. 
 
 Attorney General Bill Schuette has charged Courser and Gamrat with multiple felony charges for misconduct in office related the affair and their operation of an unusual combined House office. 
 
 Schuette also is named as a defendant in the Courser-Gamrat complaint. The former lawmakers intend to sue the Republican attorney general in an effort to challenge the constitutionality of the Legislature’s procedures for expelling members and the common law code Schuette used to charge them. 
 
 Baker said his client hasn’t pursued the civil lawsuit yet because “the felony charges became a priority.” 
 
 Separately, Allard and Graham are suing their former bosses in Ingham County Circuit Court, arguing the Courser-Gamrat affair created a hostile work environment. A judge has scheduled a March 2017 trial for the slow-moving lawsuit. 
 
 Matthew DePerno, a Portage attorney representing Courser, sent subpoenas last week to several individuals, including Republican political consultant David Forsmark. 
 
 Courser said he does not know who received subpoenas from his attorney, but he suggested the list likely included “anyone tangentially involved” in his expulsion hearing or a probe conducted by the House Business Office. 
 
 In August, Courser accused Forsmark of being part of a “ring” of individuals who sent the anonymous text messages to him and Gamrat threatening to expose their affair if they didn’t resign from office. 
 
 Forsmark said Wednesday he would fight the subpoena, which asked for bank records, telephone records and electronic communications with a list of individuals dating back to Nov. 1, 2014. 
 
 “My only connection to this is his fevered imaginations, which the State Police investigation already proved what he said I did was done by Joe Gamrat,” Forsmark told The News. 
 
 Gamrat lawyer Baker said he didn’t know Courser’s attorney had issued any subpoenas. 
 
 “I wasn’t aware of that,” Baker said Wednesday. 
 
 DePerno did not return messages seeking comment. 
 
 joosting@detroitnews.com 
 
 clivengood@detroitnews.com 
 
 (517) 371-3661 
 
 What filing means 
 
 Michigan law requires individuals who want to sue the state to file a notice of intention in the state Court of Claims. It is like a statute of limitations. In some cases where claimants are seeking monetary damages, they must file the notice within six months of the event that prompted the lawsuit so they can preserve the right to sue. 
 
 Read or Share this story: http://detne.ws/1MT1Fmr
– Todd Courser, the Michigan lawmaker who thought starting a smear campaign against himself was a good way to cover up his affair with fellow lawmaker Cindy Gamrat, now apparently thinks he has grounds to sue the state for forcing him out of office. Courser and Gamrat have filed an "intent to sue" notice, claiming that the Michigan House of Representatives, Speaker Kevin Cotter, and their former aides conspired to end their political careers, the Detroit Free Press reports. Courser resigned and Gamrat was expelled after a marathon 16-hour hearing last September, which the legal notice now alleges was "false arrest" and "false imprisonment," reports the Detroit News. Courser and Gamrat, both Republicans, filed the notice just before the deadline to preserve their ability to sue. The notice states that they could seek $500,000 for "psychological and emotional distress" caused by their removal from office, which they allege was more to do with their opposition to a road funding package than the affair and cover-up. They claim to be victims of "undercover surveillance operations, illegal wiretapping and eavesdropping, extortion, secret meetings, threats and intimidation, identity theft, invasion of privacy, and hacking," according to legal documents. In related legal actions, former aides are suing Courser and Gamrat for firing them after they helped expose the affair, and Michigan's AG has filed felony charges against the pair for misconduct in office, lying under oath, and asking staffers to forge their signatures on official documents.