Starting in 1996, Alexa Internet has been donating their crawl data to the Internet Archive. Flowing in every day, these data are added to the Wayback Machine after an embargo period. ||||| You will never guess which political party he belongs to! 
 
 Advertisement 
 
 Via the Topeka Capital-Journal, Kansas state senator Mitch Holmes, chairman of the Kansas Senate Ethics and Elections Committee, has whipped up and instituted a dress code for female witnesses testifying on ethics and elections bills. “Low-cut necklines and mini-skirts are inappropriate,” his rules say. 
 
 Naturally, there are no specific restrictions for men. There are also no specifics within his 11-point guidelines—“implemented solely at his discretion”—about exactly what constitutes a low-cut neckline or a miniskirt. 
 
 Advertisement 
 
 “It’s one of those things that’s hard to define,” Holmes said. “Put it out there and let people know we’re really looking for you to be addressing the issue rather than trying to distract or bring eyes to yourself.” 
 
 In other words, anything on a woman’s body that distracts this white male senator falls short of his guidelines for what is appropriate in the Statehouse. So watch out, literally any women who don’t dress exactly like a 54-year-old Midwestern man’s (surely totally neutral) idea of what’s respectable, or who in any other way happen to “bring eyes.” 
 
 Holmes was immediately and inevitably criticized by from women on both sides of the aisle. 
 
 Sponsored 
 
 Sen. Carolyn McGinn, a Sedgwick Republican, said wardrobe restrictions set by Holmes could steer people away from the Capitol who don’t have clothing that meets his ideal. An individual’s opinions are more significant than what garment drapes that person’s shoulders, she said. “I am more interested in what they have to say about the direction our state should go than what they’re wearing that day,” McGinn said. 
 
 According to the Capital-Journal, the Kansas Statehouse got itself into another dress-related fuss in 2014, when a female representative instituted a dress code for interns. That dress code, however, affected both men and women. Holmes’s, notably, does not. 
 
 Advertisement 
 
 Advertisement 
 
 Holmes said he considered stipulating men had to wear suit and tie when addressing his Senate committee, but decided males didn’t need supplemental instruction on how to look professional. 
 
 Yeah, totally. Why would they need supplemental instruction on anything? They’re men. 
 
 “Unrelated”: Holmes’s top campaign donor in 2008 was the Koch boys, and he’s got a 93 percent approval rating from the NRA. 
 
 
 
 Contact the author at jia@jezebel.com. 
 
 Advertisement
– A Kansas state senator has some people's knickers in a twist after implementing a new dress code that singles out women who wear "skimpy skirts or blouses with plunging necklines," the Topeka Capital-Journal reports. Mitch Holmes is the chairman of the state's ethics and elections committee, and his new dress code applies to those testifying before the committee. The problem, according to critics: It singles out women while having no male-specific rules. “He could have just said that attire is business professional and kept it gender neutral,” state Rep. Stephanie Clayton, a fellow Republican, tells the Kansas City Star. "I’m just appalled anyone would treat taxpaying Kansans with such disdain." The rule causing the trouble reads, "For ladies, low-cut necklines and mini-skirts are inappropriate." Holmes says he included that because he's seen women around the Capitol dressing "provocatively," which can be a "distraction." He also explains that men don't need additional rules to let them know how to dress appropriately. Other female senators besides Clayton have called Holmes out over the new dress code. “Oh, for crying out loud, what century is this?” Sen. Laura Kelly asks the Capital-Journal. Another senator says people's opinions on bills should be more important than what they're wearing. A blogger at Jezebel translates the code into advice: "Watch out, literally any women who don’t dress exactly like a 54-year-old Midwestern man’s (surely totally neutral) idea of what’s respectable, or who in any other way happen to 'bring eyes.'" (Kansas is not the only state to introduce this kind of code.)