or VoIP providers, network operators, or local network administrators. The proposed solution is based on the Mist privacy enhancement architec- ture. The research in this area is ongoing. Several issues are still open, and the proposed system should be further evaluated against privacy threats, vul- nerabilities and potential attacks. References [1] Rana, S., and J. Sharma. 2006. Frontiers of Geographic Information Technology. Berlin: Springer; New York: Heidelberg Publishers. [2] Pfitzmann, A., and M. Khntopp. 2004. Anonymity, unobservability, and pseudonymity: A proposal for terminology, draft v0.21, September. [3] Serjantov, A., and G. Danezis. 2002. Towards an information theoretic metric for anonymity, in Paul Syverson and Roger Dingledine, editors, Privacy Enhancing Technologies. LNCS, San Francisco, CA. [4] Michael K. Reiter, and Aviel D. Rubin. 1998. Crowds: Anonymity for web transactions. ACM Transactions Information Systems Security 1 (1):66-92. [5] Rosenberg, J., H. Schulzrinne, G. Camarillo, A. Johnston, J. Peterson, R. Sparks, M. Handley, and E. Schooler. 2002. SIP: Session Initiation Protocol. Request for Comments 3261, IETF. June. [6] Chaum, D. 1981. Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and dig- ital pseudonyms. Communications of the ACM 4 (2): February. © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC SIP Handbook: Services, Technologies, and Security [7] Kesdogan, D., J. Egner, and R. Buschkes. 1998. Stop-and-go MIXes providing probabilistic security in an open system, 2nd International Workshop on Information Hiding. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1525:83-98. [8] Levine, B.N., and C. Shields. 2002. Hordes: A multicast-based protocol for anonymity. Journal of Computer Security 10 (3):213-40. [9] Reed, M.G., P.F. Syverson, and D.M. Goldschlag. 1998. Anonymous con- nections and onion routing. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Commu- nications 16 (4):482-94. [10] Al-Muhtadi, J., R. Campbell, A. Kapadia, D. Mickunas, and S. Yi. 2002. Routing through the mist: Privacy preserving communication in ubi