ion sector Figure 11.38 Distribution of single-stream and dual-stream opportunities in the measured scenario. Due to the significant shadowing along some of the roads and the low transmit power at the base station, we see MIMO or dual-stream transmission to be available up to a distance of about 600 m. The high granularity of the link adaptation and the multiuser diversity exploited by the channel-aware proportional fair scheduler allowed for a smooth transition of the sum rate along the measurement track. References 1. Telatar, E. 1999. Capacity of multiantenna Gaussian channels. European Transactions on Telecommunications 10 (6): 585-596. 2. Jungnickel, V., A. Forck, T. Haustein, S. Schiffermuller, C. von Helmolt, F. Luhn, M. Pollock, C. Juchems, M. Lampe, W. Zirwas, et al. 2005. 1 Gb/s MIMO-OFDM transmission experiments. Proceedings of VTC 2005, Dallas, TX, September 2005, 2:861-866. C 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC Early Real-Time Experiments and Field Trial Measurements 3. Jungnickel, V., S. Jaeckel, L. Thiele, U. Krueger, A. Brylka, and C. von Helmolt. 2006. Capacity measurements in a multicell MIMO system. Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2006), San Francisco, CA, November 2006, pp. 1-6. 4. Bolcskei, H., R. Nabar, V. Erceg, D. Gesbert, and A. Paulraj. 2001. Performance of spatial multiplexing in the presence of polarization diversity. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '01) 4: 2437-2440. 5. Erceg, V., H. Sampath, and S. Catreux-Erceg. 2006. Dual-polarization versus single- polarization MIMO channel measurement results and modeling. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 5 (1): 28-33. 6. Shafi, M., M. Zhang, A. Moustakas, P. Smith, A. Molisch, F. Tufvesson, and S. Simon. 2006. Polarized MIMO channels in 3-D: Models, measurements and mutual information. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 24 (3): 514-527. 7. Degen, C., and W. Keusgen. 2002. Performance of polarization multiplexing in mobile