eraser button to delete any personal informa- tion that was gathered. Regulatory Issues This act has not yet been passed. Nor have any laws governing adult privacy been passed. Industry organizations oppose the Do Not Track Kids Act of 2011 on the grounds that it is unduly onerous. In addition, they stated that it would weaken privacy because web sites would collect information about web surfers' ages. They also argue that it discourages sites from directing content to teenagers because of the difficulty of complying with the act, thus limiting services to teenagers. At present, individuals concerned about deleting untruthful or damaging infor- mation about minors must hire private services such as Reputation.com to attempt to correct or delete this information. These efforts are not always successful. Thus, young people, who often don't have the maturity to understand the damage that can be caused by careless web hosts, have little legal protection. It's also unclear, if a similar privacy act is passed, whether teenagers would understand the implications of allowing geo- location services to track and keep information about their location. Efforts to Influence Regulations Because telecommunications is SO heavily regulated, all large mobile, cable TV, and landline providers spend sizeable amounts of money on court cases and on lobbyists to attempt to influence lawmakers and regulatory agencies. Legal Challenges to FCC Rulings Since the mid-1990s, providers have taken the FCC to court over rulings that they felt had the potential to negatively affect them. The courts have handed down significant judgments blocking many of these FCC rulings. For example, Comcast appealed the FCC fine imposed against it for blocking customers' access to a peer-to-peer site. In April 2010 the courts sided with Comcast and struck down FCC rules prohibiting broadband providers from slowing or delaying Internet traffic. The courts also sided with large telephone companies in the following cases. The United States Court of Appeals for th