ications: Theory and applications, Leon Courville, Alain de Fontenay, and Rodney Dobell (eds.). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., pp. 199-230. DeBow, Michael 1995. "Unjust compensation: The continuing need for reform," South Carolina Law Review 46: 579-94. DeGraba, Patrick 2000. Bill and keep at the central office as an efficient interconnection regime. Office of Plans and Policy Working Paper No. 33, Federal Communications Commission, hhttp://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp33.pdf. Demsetz, Harold 1968. "Why regulate utilities?" Journal of Law and Economics 11 1(Apr): 55-65. Director, Aaron and Edward H. Levi 1956. "Law and the future: Trade regulation," North- western University Law Review 51: 258-72. Dixit, Avinash K. and Joseph E. Stiglitz 1977. "Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity," American Economic Review 67: 297-308. Drobak, John N. 1985. "From turnpike to nuclear-power: The constitutional limits on utility rate regulation," Boston University Law Review 65: 65-125. Dutta, Bhaskar and Matthew O. Jackson 2003. Networks and groups. New York: Springer. Easterbrook, Frank H. 1986. "On identifying exclusionary conduct," Notre Dame Law Review 61: 972-80. Economides, Nicholas 1996. "The economics of networks," International Journal of Indus- trial Organization 14: 673-99. 2005. "The economics of the Internet backbone," in Majumdar et al. (eds.), pp. 375-413. Economides, Nicholas, Giuseppe Lopomo, and Glenn A. Woroch 1996. "Regulatory pricing rules to neutralize network dominance," Industrial and Corporate Change 5: 1013-28. Eisenach, Jeffrey A. and Thomas M. Lenard (eds.) 1999. Competition, innovation and the Microsoft monopoly: Antitrust in the digital marketplace. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Eisner, James and Dale E. Lehman 2001. Regulatory behavior and competitive entry. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Western Conference, Center for Research in Regulated Industries, http://www.aestudies.com/library/elpaper.pdf. Elhauge, Einer R. 1991. "The scope of antitrus