cent channel performance. These are factors that distinguish a blocking situation from an adjacent channel situation in which significant BS receiver degradation can be caused at very low levels due to the poor ACP from the UE [5]. During each trial of the simulations, we make uniform drops of the UE, adapt power levels, and record data6. From these results, we plot CDF of the total signal appearing at the receivers' inputs to be covered in the results sections. 6 A thousand such trials are made. The UTRA Transmission System 5.5.6.1 Simulation Scenario Assumptions for 1 and 5 km Cell Radius The assumptions here are extracts from [5] to be consistent with the example results. The primary simulation assumptions for the 1 km radius are then: both networks are operated with the average number of users (50) that provide 6 dB noise rise; 2. the two networks have maximal geographic offset (a worst case condition); cell radius is 1 km; 4. maximum UE power is 21 dBm; 5. UE spurious and noise in a 4.1 MHz bandwidth is 46 dB; BS selectivity is 100 dB (to remove its effect); CII requirement is -21 dB; 8. BS antenna gain is 11 dB; 9. UE antenna gain is 0 dB; and 10. minimum path loss is 70 dB excluding antenna gains. The primary assumptions that are common to all simulations in the 5 km radius are: the two networks have maximal geographic offset (a worst case condition); 2. cell radius is 5 km; 3. UE spurious and noise in a channel bandwidth is 46 dB; 4. BS selectivity is 100 dB (to remove its effect); 5. BS antenna gain is 11 dB; 6. UE antenna gain is 0 dB; minimum path loss is 70 dB including antenna gains; in addition, for the speech simulations, maximum UE power is 21 dBm and the CII requirement is -21 dB; for the data simulations, maximum UE power is 33 dBm and the CII requirement is -11.4 dB. Note that this is different from the basic assumption in the ACIR section, since its data power level is 21 dBm, just like the speech level. 5.5.6.2 Simulation Parameters for 24 dBm Terminals The only difference with respect to the