 to less dignity under the law. W. Union Tel. Co. V. Pa. R.R., 195 U.S. 540, 569-70, 573 (1904) (noting that a right of way obtained through condemnation remains private property even when devoted to a public use); United Rys. & Elec. Co. V. West, 280 U.S. 234, 249 (1930) (holding that "the property of a public utility, although devoted to the public service and impressed with public interest, is still private property"), overruled in part on other grounds by Fed. Power Comm'n V. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591 (1944); Gulf Power Co. V. United States, 187 F.3d 1324, 1329-30 (11th Cir. 1999) ("A property owner is entitled to expect that the property it acquired via eminent domain came with the right all property has"). 41 Olsen V. Nebraska ex rel. W. Reference & Bond Ass'n, 313 U.S. 236, 245 (1941). In the words of Brandeis himself: [S]ize alone gives to giant corporations a social significance not attached ordinarily to smaller units of private enterprise. Through size, corporations, once merely an efficient tool employed by individuals in the conduct of private business, have become an institution - an institution which has brought such concentration of economic power that so-called private corporations are sometimes able to dominate the state. The typical business corporation of the last century, owned by a small group of individuals, managed by their owners, and limited in size by their personal wealth, is being supplanted by huge concerns in which the lives of tens or hundreds of thousands of employees and the property of tens or hundreds of thousands of investors are subjected, through the corporate mechanism, to the control of a few men The changes thereby wrought in the lives of the workers, of the owners and of the general public, are SO fundamental and far-reaching as to lead these scholars to compare the evolving "corporate system" with the feudal system; and to lead other men of insight and experience to assert that this "master institution of civilised life is committing it to the rule of a plutocr