quires programmer to write the control application in C++ which can be slow for development and debugging. There Comes the Role of POX POX has a really high demand, support from various tech communities and is very well managed in its own way. It is very easy to use and easy to write the control programmes. It can be used to quickly prototype a brand new control application. But being written in python it does not provide that level of performance which is provided by NOX. You can use POX for class projects or University Research Programmes but it is refrained to be used in Large Internet Data centres because of Low Performance. Well, welcome to the World of Comparison, the researchers believe that you have been dwelling in one for a long time now. Let's get started and compare the different types of controllers and which is better and in which situation. 1. NOX Nox is the tyro or the building block in the phase of OpenFlow controller. It provides the network control platform facility that actually gives a level notch programmable interface for the development control network apps and for managing purposes. The abstractive nature of NOX turns network into a software conundrum. Before getting deeper, let's clarify what is NOX really: The work was initiated by a company known as Nicira Networks which has now been acquired by VMware; alongside OpenFlow There has been an introduction of multiple flavors and advancements in the NOX environment particularly giving rise to 3 separate lines: Classic: It is widely used free software which was introduced in the year 2009 under the GNU General Public License. Original: It can be said as the advancement of classic in a unique way. It is great performance in the metrics of speed and maintains excellent base for the Downloaded 4/15/2022 9:44:49 AM Nova Southeastern University IP Address: 137.52.76.29 The Heart and Brain of SDN codes but has only support of C++ programming language and provides few applications support. POX: It is considered a brother to the NOX family (or even