is (m) h=3.2m h=8.7m Y-axis (m) Fig. 8.4 Estimation of distribution of received power levels for the UPNA campus scenario, considering frequencies of operation f@ 868 MHz, f@2.4GHz, and f@ 3.5 GHz, for a given linear radial TX-RX distribution, considering heights of 3.2 m and 8.7m, respectively The results obtained for the power delay profile distributions show relevant differences in terms of the number of multipath components detected, as well as their time distribution, with delay spread values in the range of 2000 ns to over 5000 ns, depending on the transceiver location. This behavior is directly related to the location of the transceivers as well as by the configuration of the scattering elements in the scenario under test. This enables to retrieve additional parameters, such as delay dispersion distributions for the complete volume of operation, which in turn provides information related to coherence time or Doppler shift. In this way, spatial locations for the potential network node deployments can be optimized in order to enhance their operation. 8.2.2 Urban City Center Scenario A second scenario has been analyzed, in this case an urban setting within the center of the city of Pamplona in Spain. This scenario can be considered a typical dense urban scenario, in which a relevant amount of vehicular traffic as well as domestic households will be present. A schematic of the scenario that has been implemented in order to perform the deterministic 3D RL analysis is presented in Fig. 8.6. As in the case of the previous scenario, it enables the analysis of indoor/outdoor hybrid I. Picallo et al. Location A. h=2.9m Location B, h=3.2m Location C, h=8.7m Delay (ns) Location D. h=3m Location E, h=2m Location F. h=1.5m Delay (ns) Location G. h=3m Location H. h=3.2m Location I, h=3m Delay (ns) Fig. 8.5 Estimation of power delay profiles for three different transceiver locations, considering frequency of operation of f@868MHz. The location for each one of the transceiver locations is given by a red dot within the scen