ION MIXER L(s)L(s+2jwo)Yfb(s+2jw0) L(s)Yo(s)L(s+2jwo)Yfb(s+2jwo) This expression is entirely dominated by the first term. The parasitic transfer from baseband to baseband is described by L(s)L(s-jwo)Yfb(s-jwo) L(s)L(s+jwo)Yfb(s+jwo) 2 L(s)Yo(s)L(s-jwo)Yfb(s-jwo) t2 L(s)Yo(s)L(s+jwo)Yfb(s+jw0) (C.4) L(s)Yfb(s)L(s-jwo)Yfb(s-jw0) L(s)Yfb(s)L(s+jwo)Yfb(s+jwo) L(s)Y(s+jwo) while the parasitic transfer from 2fo to baseband is described by YG-2,0(s+2jwo)Ygs(s+2jw0) L(s)Y b(s + 2j00) 1 B3WV L(s)L(s+jwo)Yfb(s+jw) (C.5) L(s)Yo(s)L(s+jwo)Yfb(s+jwo L(s)Yfb(s)L(s+jwo)Yfb(s+jwo) L(s)L(s+2jwo)Yfb(s+2jwo) L(s)L(s+2jwo)Yfb(s+2jwo) It depends on the frequency interval to decide on which of the terms in the expressions (C.4) and (C.5) are dominant. Appendix D Oscillator dynamics: analysis of the deviation from the attracting manifold n section 5.5 of chapter 5, we discussed the behavior of a weakly perturbed oscil- lator, i.e. the behavior of a core system interacting with weak disturbances. Math- ematically, we were interested in the structure of the waveforms XE(T) that solve the system of DAEs (D.1) Here, as usual, the variable E is called a perturbation variable and marks the distur- bances. Solutions to (D.1) were shown to be structured as (D.2) The first component of this solution models the motion over the attracting manifold M. This manifold consists of all steady-state solutions that solve the core system, i.e. the steady-state solutions to (D.1) for E = 0. The motion over this manifold was discussed in depth in section 5.5 of chapter 5. This appendix deals with the second component in (D.2) which models the oscillator's deviation from the manifold M. In doing so, special interest is given as to prove that EAX(T) remains bounded. This study also yields a time constant that characterizes how long it takes for the manifold M to attract solutions in its neighborhood. Note that in what follows, we discuss the behavior of the normalized deviation Ax(t). The real deviation is obtained by multiplying this normalized deviation wit