The EU's investigation was prompted by complaints from EU companies, that search results were skewed in Google's favor and that EU companies' results were demoted to lower rankings on search result pages. For example, Google might rank its own flight information service higher than a competitive flight information service. The EU complaint stated in part that Google was using anti- competitive tactics to take advantage of its 90 percent market share in searches. As a result of the EU fine and agreement, Google stated that it would let companies bid for the top placement in search, rather than ranking search results by links to products retailers who had paid Google to rank high in searches. Google further agreed to make some changes in its search shopping methodologies, and to stop promoting its own shopping services while demoting rivals' comparison sites. The EU left it up to Google to create its own solutions to these issues. Per EU competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager, if the EU is not satisfied with Google's changes made within 90 days of the fine, the EU will fine Google up to 5 percent of its total global search revenue each day. The EU hired accounting firm KPMG and search engine optimization marketing company Mavens to monitor Google's search results for compliance with the EU agreement. Despite this www.TechnicalPDF.com agreement, Google has stated that it will continue to challenge the fine in the courts. In addition to the EU's investigation into Google's search practices, in 2016 the EU filed anti-trust charges against Google over its dominant position in search on Android operating system mobile phones and tablet computers. The complaint alleged that Google is monopolistic in requiring that Android phone manufacturers pre-load the Google Chrome browser and Google Search on phones. The charges are further based on Google's practice of offering financial incentives to carriers and manufacturers to make Google's search services the only pre-loaded search on mobile phones. In 2016, Russia filed a