ns Corp. UNE/on-net GST Telecom UNE plus on-net No (acquitted by Time Warner in bankruptcy) ICG Telecommunications UNE/on-net Intermedia Communications No (acquired by WorldCom) ITC DeltaCom Level 3 Communications Owns 1/3 of RCN 1,101 McLeod USA Inc. Resale plus UNE Yes, reorganized in bankruptcy Mpower Holding Corp. Network Access Solutions No (acquired by DSLNET) Network Plus CP No (assets sold in bankruptcy) NorthPoint Communications No (assets sold in bankruptcy) Net 2000 Communications UNE plus resale XO Communications (Nextlink) On-net/ UNE Yes (reorganized in bankruptcy) 1,260 Pac-West Telecomm Pointe Communications RCN Corp. On-net/resale Yes (in bankruptcy) Rhythms NetConnections Talk America UNE-P Teligent On-net Yes (reorganized in bankruptcy) Telocity Time Warner Telecom On-net USOL Holdings On-net/UNE World Access Winstar Communications On-net/UNE-P No (sold in bankruptcy to IDT) WorldCom UNE-P Yes (reorganized in bankruptcy; now called MCI) Local revenues unknown Z-Tel Technologies UNE-P Total for public companies (25 public companies) 9,250 Source: Financial reports of companies; also www.quote.yahoo.com and www.alts.org. a. Communications revenue only. Local Competition under the 1996 Act in 2002; virtually all of this was from the use of UNE loops or the UNE platform (see table 4-3). 53 These private companies appear to have a nar- rower geographical focus, generally using unbundled loops to serve small to medium-sized businesses. Without public financial data on their perfor- mance, it is impossible to know if they are more successful than their pub- licly traded counterparts listed in table 4-2. It is important to stress, how- ever, that they apparently accounted for fewer than 2 percent of U.S. switched access lines in 2002. Unless entrants can attract high-revenue customers or offer other cus- tomers new services, they will have difficulty competing with the incum- bent telephone companies. The recipe for success may be facilities-based entry that allows the entrant to offer an array of serv