el Architecture [WL 06] HSPA simulator overview [LZK*08] CIP packet format LIPE packet format Bandwidth utilization efficiency over file sizes List of Figures A.13 TCP connection throughput of each RAB type - multiple RABs scenario Average cell throughput Average noise rise Overall average application throughput COV of cell throughput Dimensioning factor lub link utilization Dimensioning factor VS. QoS target UMTS Network supporting Rel99 and HSPA traffic Concept of Traffic Separation Performance comparisons: with TS and without TS Dimensioning for different UTRAN load Total ATM cell discards on downlink and uplink HSDPA and HSUPA TCP retransmissions HSDPA application throughput Downlink and uplink ATM link throughput Validating the dimensioning approach for the mixed traffic scenario Validating Approach (1): E2E delays over different target delay factors Validating Approach (2): E2E delays over different offered last mile loads Impact of overbooking Optimum OB factor (left), link utilization (right) VS. last mile utilizations Optimum OB factor VS. last mile utilization (various last mile links) Optimum OB factor VS. last mile link capacity (packet-switched dominant) Impact of number of Node Bs Average application delay with 95% CI: web scenario, RAB 128 kbps, no CAC, constant file size of 50 kbyte, lub link = 1 E1 line (ATM) Packet loss ratio with 95% CI: web scenario, RAB 128 kbps, no CAC, constant file size of 50 kbyte, lub link = 1 E1 line (ATM) CAC reject ratio with 95% CI: voice scenario, lub link =1 Mbps (ATM) LRE distribution function F(x) and relative error d(x) for queuing delays of circuit-switched voice: voice scenario, lub link =1.7 Mbps (ATM) Calculated bandwidth efficiency - ATM VS. IP-based UTRAN Simulated bandwidth efficiency - ATM VS. IP-based UTRAN (voice traffic) Simulated FP PDU delay - ATM VS. IP-based UTRAN (voice traffic) Simulated bandwidth efficiency - ATM VS. IP-based UTRAN (web traffic) Simulated FP PDU delay - ATM VS. IP-based UTRAN (web traffic) List of Tables Traffic classes [3GP06c