in his dissent in the Straub v. BMT by Todd
... that in his dissent in the Straub v. BMT by Todd case, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Roger Owen DeBruler argued that a promise to pay someone else's share of child support should be considered legally binding?
... that <b id="mwCBg"><a href="./Straub_v._BMT_by_Todd#Dissent" id="mwCBk" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Straub v. BMT by Todd">in his dissent in the <i id="mwCBo">Straub v. BMT by Todd</i></a></b> case, <a href="./Indiana_Supreme_Court" id="mwCBs" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Indiana Supreme Court">Indiana Supreme Court</a> Justice Roger Owen DeBruler argued that a promise to pay someone else's share of <a href="./Child_support" id="mwCBw" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Child support">child support</a> should be considered legally binding?