irrelevant considerations
... that a 1991 Singapore court case quashed an order requiring a woman to rename her business for being too similar to J. C. Penney as the authorities had taken into account irrelevant considerations?
... that a 1991 <a href="./Singapore" id="mwA8w" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Singapore">Singapore</a> court case <a href="./Remedies_in_Singapore_administrative_law#Quashing_orders" id="mwA80" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Remedies in Singapore administrative law">quashed</a> an order requiring a woman to rename her business for being too similar to <a class="mw-redirect" href="./J._C._Penney" id="mwA84" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="J. C. Penney">J. C. Penney</a> as the authorities had taken into account <b id="mwA88"><a href="./Relevant_and_irrelevant_considerations_in_Singapore_administrative_law" id="mwA9A" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Relevant and irrelevant considerations in Singapore administrative law">irrelevant considerations</a></b>?