Shadrake v. Attorney-General
... that in Shadrake v. Attorney-General, where a British journalist was charged with scandalizing the Singapore courts, the Court of Appeal declined to apply the American "clear and present danger" test?
... that in <i id="mwCaI"><b id="mwCaM"><a class="mw-redirect" href="./Shadrake_v._Attorney-General" id="mwCaQ" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Shadrake v. Attorney-General">Shadrake v. Attorney-General</a></b></i>, where a <a href="./Alan_Shadrake" id="mwCaU" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Alan Shadrake">British journalist</a> was charged with <a href="./Offence_of_scandalizing_the_court_in_Singapore" id="mwCaY" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Offence of scandalizing the court in Singapore">scandalizing</a> the <a href="./Singapore" id="mwCac" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Singapore">Singapore</a> <a href="./Judicial_system_of_Singapore" id="mwCag" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Judicial system of Singapore">courts</a>, the <a href="./Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore" id="mwCak" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Court of Appeal of Singapore">Court of Appeal</a> declined to apply the American "<a href="./Clear_and_present_danger" id="mwCao" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Clear and present danger">clear and present danger</a>" test?