Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside
... that in Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether the proximity of High Times, National Lampoon, and Rolling Stone to drug paraphernalia was marketing for illegal use?
... that in <i id="mwDeI"><b id="mwDeM"><a href="./Hoffman_Estates_v._The_Flipside,_Hoffman_Estates,_Inc." id="mwDeQ" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.">Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside</a></b></i>, the <a class="mw-redirect" href="./U.S._Supreme_Court" id="mwDeU" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="U.S. Supreme Court">U.S. Supreme Court</a> considered whether the proximity of <i id="mwDeY"><a href="./High_Times" id="mwDec" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="High Times">High Times</a></i>, <i id="mwDeg"><a href="./National_Lampoon_(magazine)" id="mwDek" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="National Lampoon (magazine)">National Lampoon</a></i>, and <i id="mwDeo"><a href="./Rolling_Stone" id="mwDes" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Rolling Stone">Rolling Stone</a></i> to <a href="./Drug_paraphernalia" id="mwDew" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Drug paraphernalia">drug paraphernalia</a> was marketing for illegal use?