White v Driver
... that, in the case of White v Driver, Sir John Nicholl ruled that the will of an insane person could be valid provided the testator was lucid when making the will?
... that, in the case of <i id="mwGAM"><b id="mwGAQ"><a href="./White_v_Driver" id="mwGAU" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="White v Driver">White v Driver</a></b></i>, <a class="mw-redirect" href="./Sir_John_Nicholl" id="mwGAY" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Sir John Nicholl">Sir John Nicholl</a> ruled that the will of an insane person could be valid provided the testator was lucid when making the will?