Penry v. Johnson
... that Justice Thomas said the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Penry v. Johnson on the relevance of mental retardation in death penalty sentencing sent "mixed signals" to lower courts?
... that Justice <a href="./Clarence_Thomas" id="mwA6o" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Clarence Thomas">Thomas</a> said the <a href="./Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States" id="mwA6s" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Supreme Court of the United States">U.S. Supreme Court</a>'s decision in <i id="mwA6w"><b id="mwA60"><a href="./Penry_v._Johnson" id="mwA64" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Penry v. Johnson">Penry v. Johnson</a></b></i> on the relevance of <a class="mw-redirect" href="./Mental_retardation" id="mwA68" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Mental retardation">mental retardation</a> in <a href="./Capital_punishment" id="mwA7A" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Capital punishment">death penalty</a> <a href="./Sentence_(law)" id="mwA7E" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Sentence (law)">sentencing</a> sent "mixed signals" to lower courts?