Eng Foong Ho v. AG
... that Eng Foong Ho v. AG held that the Singapore Constitution was not breached when a Chinese temple was compulsorily acquired and an Indian mission and a Christian church nearby were not?
... that <i id="mwDoo"><b id="mwDos"><a class="mw-redirect" href="./Eng_Foong_Ho_v._Attorney-General" id="mwDow" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Eng Foong Ho v. Attorney-General">Eng Foong Ho v. AG</a></b></i> held that the <a href="./Constitution_of_Singapore" id="mwDo0" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Constitution of Singapore">Singapore Constitution</a> was not breached when <a href="./Jin_Long_Si_Temple" id="mwDo4" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Jin Long Si Temple">a Chinese temple</a> was <a href="./Eminent_domain" id="mwDo8" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Eminent domain">compulsorily acquired</a> and an Indian mission and a Christian church nearby were not?