R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.1)
... that the House of Lords took the unprecedented decision to set aside R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.1) because of concerns a judge could have been biased?
... that the <a href="./House_of_Lords" id="mwExQ" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="House of Lords">House of Lords</a> took the unprecedented decision to set aside <i id="mwExU"><b id="mwExY"><a class="mw-redirect" href="./R_v_Bow_Street_Metropolitan_Stipendiary_Magistrate_Ex_parte_Pinochet_Ugarte_(No.1)" id="mwExc" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.1)">R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No.1)</a></b></i> because of concerns a judge could have been biased?