Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc
... that in Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc, Lord Goff suggested that Rylands v Fletcher was not an independent tort, but instead part of nuisance?
... that in <i id="mwIg"><b id="mwIw"><a href="./Cambridge_Water_Co_Ltd_v_Eastern_Counties_Leather_plc" id="mwJA" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc">Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc</a></b></i>, <a href="./Robert_Goff,_Baron_Goff_of_Chieveley" id="mwJQ" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Robert Goff, Baron Goff of Chieveley">Lord Goff</a> suggested that <i id="mwJg"><a href="./Rylands_v_Fletcher" id="mwJw" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Rylands v Fletcher">Rylands v Fletcher</a></i> was not an independent <a href="./Tort" id="mwKA" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Tort">tort</a>, but instead part of <a href="./Nuisance_in_English_law" id="mwKQ" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Nuisance in English law">nuisance</a>?