Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee and the Liverpool Post and Echo Ltd
... that in Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee and the Liverpool Post and Echo Ltd, Lord Nicholls decided that the disputed test applied by the High Court judge was not necessarily wrong, but allowed the appeal anyway?
... that in <i id="mwEiI"><b id="mwEiM"><a class="mw-redirect" href="./Cream_Holdings_Ltd_v_Banerjee_and_the_Liverpool_Post_and_Echo_Ltd" id="mwEiQ" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee and the Liverpool Post and Echo Ltd">Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee and the Liverpool Post and Echo Ltd</a></b></i>, <a href="./Donald_Nicholls,_Baron_Nicholls_of_Birkenhead" id="mwEiU" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Donald Nicholls, Baron Nicholls of Birkenhead">Lord Nicholls</a> decided that the disputed test applied by the <a href="./High_Court_of_Justice" id="mwEiY" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="High Court of Justice">High Court</a> judge was not necessarily wrong, but allowed the appeal anyway?