Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna
... that in Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, the U.S. Supreme Court held that challenges to the legality of a contract must be heard by an arbitrator if the contract has an arbitration clause?
... that in <i id="mwFAQ"><b id="mwFAU"><a href="./Buckeye_Check_Cashing,_Inc._v._Cardegna" id="mwFAY" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna">Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna</a></b></i>, the <a class="mw-redirect" href="./U.S._Supreme_Court" id="mwFAc" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="U.S. Supreme Court">U.S. Supreme Court</a> held that <a href="./Illegal_agreement" id="mwFAg" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Illegal agreement">challenges to the legality</a> of a <a href="./Contract" id="mwFAk" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Contract">contract</a> must be heard by an <a href="./Arbitration" id="mwFAo" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Arbitration">arbitrator</a> if the contract has an <a href="./Arbitration_clause" id="mwFAs" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Arbitration clause">arbitration clause</a>?