Miller v. Jackson
...that in Miller v. Jackson the Court of Appeal of England and Wales found that a cricket club was liable in negligence and nuisance when sixes were hit over the boundary onto neighbouring property, and that it is best known for the lyrical dissenting judgment of Lord Denning, MR?
...that in <i id="mwrA"><b id="mwrQ"><a class="mw-redirect" href="./Miller_v._Jackson" id="mwrg" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Miller v. Jackson">Miller v. Jackson</a></b></i> the <a class="mw-redirect" href="./Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales" id="mwrw" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Court of Appeal of England and Wales">Court of Appeal of England and Wales</a> found that a <a class="mw-redirect" href="./Cricket_club" id="mwsA" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Cricket club">cricket club</a> was liable in <a href="./Negligence" id="mwsQ" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Negligence">negligence</a> and <a href="./Nuisance" id="mwsg" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Nuisance">nuisance</a> when <a class="mw-redirect" href="./Six_(cricket)" id="mwsw" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Six (cricket)">sixes</a> were hit over the <a href="./Boundary_(cricket)" id="mwtA" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Boundary (cricket)">boundary</a> onto neighbouring property, and that it is best known for the lyrical dissenting judgment of <a class="mw-redirect" href="./Lord_Denning" id="mwtQ" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Lord Denning">Lord Denning</a>, <a href="./Master_of_the_Rolls" id="mwtg" rel="mw:WikiLink" title="Master of the Rolls">MR</a>?