Good. But not great.

1) I had 6 failed prints due to clogs on a .4mm nozzle across the entire temp range with varied speeds and retractions. This was with the MicroSwiss all-metal hotend on a Wanhao di3. No joy. Printed fine for a few hours then borked up. Finally had success with a .5 nozzle.

2) Print quality is good - but definitely a little more plasticy than comparable product from hatchbox.

3) Spool size is very strange. Had to make a new holder to accomodate it. Very wide, only spindle contact is spool edges, so a holder that is too short will give you headaches.

4) I have questions about purity. All of the clogs output a sticky goo when unclogged that didn't cool like pure PLA. Wondering if there's not some kind of glue or binder in the sawdust they sourced. Didn't have any problems printing with a .5 nozzle but at .4 I had zero luck.

5) It does seem to handle overhangs better than the hatchbox product I had gotten used to.

-- photo is straight off the bed, no sanding or finish applied --
Good. But not great. 1) I had 6 failed prints due to clogs on a. 4mm nozzle across the entire temp range with varied speeds and retractions. This was with the MicroSwiss all-metal hotend on a Wanhao di3. No joy. Printed fine for a few hours then borked up. Finally had success with a. 5 nozzle. 2) Print quality is good - but definitely a little more plasticy than comparable product from hatchbox. 3) Spool size is very strange. Had to make a new holder to accomodate it. Very wide, only spindle contact is spool edges, so a holder that is too short will give you headaches. 4) I have questions about purity. All of the clogs output a sticky goo when unclogged that didn't cool like pure PLA. Wondering if there's not some kind of glue or binder in the sawdust they sourced. Didn't have any problems printing with a. 5 nozzle but at. 4 I had zero luck. 5) It does seem to handle overhangs better than the hatchbox product I had gotten used to. -- photo is straight off the bed, no sanding or finish applied --