Come on this is not good! There is no talent into this type of gameplay! The problem with soooo mannnyyyy game designer's today is that they are not very creative! They serotype tooo muccchhh like the kid said. Yes, the allies were the good guys and yes Socialism is wrong but why do we see WW2 from the allies side? Why can't we see it from the Axis side? Or have the choice? I'm don't care about multiplayer were kiddiees run around and run and gun, bunny hop and alll that with no real tactics, heck they know nothing of the war or tactics! Go back to URT 04 or Quake! This is war and there is no bunny hoping or rambo sytle combat in war. Everyone fights together as a team in a team. The funny thing is in the UO expansion they advertised that no one fought alone yet somehow you were the only one that could kill anything as if your me were just there in the background shooting at who know what? Brother and Arms is 10 times better than this game why? You can order your men around, flake the enemy more than just one way, and your aim is not as accurte? The guy who said it was junk because he couldn't hit anything was saying he can't hit anything and he can't jump either. Maybe he was trying to high jump over a bush. Good luck!

Anyway, if you really want to be creative create a game where you can fight turn based style either side or front of the war. Maybe if they just mix the Rome Total War style with First Person battle and relisem it could be a great hit! and of course add a world map where you could move your units around being Navy, Airforce, or Marines to different locations. That would change the WW2 hum-drums totally around! You could also play different roles as a commander or a general to a grunt soilder! Different battlefields, different weapons from each side, Tanks, artillery, you name it. Genuis!
Come on this is not good! There is no talent into this type of gameplay! The problem with soooo mannnyyyy game designer's today is that they are not very creative! They serotype tooo muccchhh like the kid said. Yes, the allies were the good guys and yes Socialism is wrong but why do we see WW2 from the allies side? Why can't we see it from the Axis side? Or have the choice? I'm don't care about multiplayer were kiddiees run around and run and gun, bunny hop and alll that with no real tactics, heck they know nothing of the war or tactics! Go back to URT 04 or Quake! This is war and there is no bunny hoping or rambo sytle combat in war. Everyone fights together as a team in a team. The funny thing is in the UO expansion they advertised that no one fought alone yet somehow you were the only one that could kill anything as if your me were just there in the background shooting at who know what? Brother and Arms is 10 times better than this game why? You can order your men around, flake the enemy more than just one way, and your aim is not as accurte? The guy who said it was junk because he couldn't hit anything was saying he can't hit anything and he can't jump either. Maybe he was trying to high jump over a bush. Good luck! Anyway, if you really want to be creative create a game where you can fight turn based style either side or front of the war. Maybe if they just mix the Rome Total War style with First Person battle and relisem it could be a great hit! and of course add a world map where you could move your units around being Navy, Airforce, or Marines to different locations. That would change the WW2 hum-drums totally around! You could also play different roles as a commander or a general to a grunt soilder! Different battlefields, different weapons from each side, Tanks, artillery, you name it. Genuis!