White House reels as FBI director contradicts official claims about alleged abuser
The White House ' s claims of no previous knowledge about domestic violence allegations against former staff secretary Rob Porter were challenged by FBI Director Christopher A . Wray ' s timeline of events . ( Jenny Starrs / The Washington Post ) The White House ' s claims of no previous knowledge about domestic violence allegations against former staff secretary Rob Porter were challenged by FBI Director Christopher A . Wray ' s timeline of events . ( Jenny Starrs / The Washington Post ) The White House struggled Tuesday to contain a widening crisis over its handling of domestic violence allegations against a senior official   as it reeled after sworn testimony by the FBI chief directly contradicted what President Trump ’ s aides had presented as the official version of events . FBI Director Christopher A . Wray told the Senate Intelligence Committee that the bureau had completed a background report on then - staff secretary Rob Porter last July and closed out the case entirely last month . Wray ’ s account is at odds with White House claims that the investigation required for Porter ’ s security clearance was “ ongoing ” until he left his job last week   after his two ex - wives publicly alleged physical and emotional abuse . The latest bout of turbulence is exacerbated by the administration ’ s reputation   earned over 13 chaotic months   for flouting institutional norms and misrepresenting facts to the public — a culture set by the president himself . The public relations fallout is further compounded by Trump ’ s own history of alleged sexual assault and his seeming reluctance to publicly condemn violence against women and give voice to the national # MeToo reckoning . The president has said little publicly about the Porter issue other than to praise the former aide for doing “ a very good job .” But he has privately expressed frustration with the week - long fallout   peppering advisers and confidants with questions about the media coverage and how the controversy is playing for him personally . FBI Director Christopher A . Wray said Feb . 13 the FBI had submitted a partial report on former White House aide Rob Porter ’ s background check in March 2017 and a full investigation in late July to the White House . ( Reuters ) The Porter drama has become all - consuming   creating an atmosphere of chaos and infighting reminiscent of the “ Game of Thrones ” stage early in Trump ’ s presidency — and distracting from the administration ’ s budget and infrastructure agenda . Many aides blame Kelly Inside the West Wing   a growing number of aides blamed Trump ’ s second White House chief of staff   John F . Kelly   for the bungled handling of the allegations against Porter . Trump in recent days has begun musing about possible replacements   according to people with knowledge of the conversations . [ FBI director rebuts White House account of handling of ex - aide ’ s security clearance ] Asked by a reporter to assess Kelly ’ s standing with Trump after a week of troubling revelations   White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said that “ the president has confidence in his chief of staff .” But Kelly does not enjoy the confidence of an increasing number of his subordinates   some of whom said they believe that the retired four - star Marine Corps general has misled them . Kelly is “ a big fat liar  ” said one White House official   who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share a candid opinion . “ To put it in terms the general would understand   his handling of the Porter scandal amounts to dereliction of duty .” This portrait of the West Wing in turmoil is based on interviews with more than a dozen top White House officials and outside advisers and confidants   most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because they feared retribution . White House chief of staff John F . Kelly is under fire   even from some West Wing colleagues . ( Jabin Botsford / The Washington Post ) Kelly ’ s attempts at explaining his role   according to some aides   have included telling senior staff members last Friday to communicate a version of events many believed to be false   as well as telling at least one confidant that he has “ a good bulls --- detector ” and had long detected troubling characteristics in  Porter  . But Kelly initially defended  Porter  last week as “ a man of true integrity and honor .” And in recent weeks   Kelly was even considering giving  Porter  an expanded role in policy development   a potential promotion first reported by CNN . [ House Oversight is investigating the White House ’ s handling of  Rob Porter    Gowdy says ] “ Credibility is the coin of the realm for any White House chief of staff   and it ’ s especially important in a White House where truth was the first casualty and credibility has been the second  ” said Chris Whipple   who wrote a book about chiefs of staff . The internal animus is not limited to Kelly . White House counsel Donald McGahn and deputy chief of staff Joe Hagin are also facing scrutiny over how Porter managed to work at the White House — and hold an interim security clearance — for more than a year despite the allegations of abuse during his two marriages . Wray disputes account On Tuesday   Wray contradicted the White House ’ s account of when the bureau informed officials about the status of Porter ’ s security clearance investigation . White House officials had said that they were first contacted last summer by the FBI about Porter ’ s clearance   and that the investigation as of last week was “ ongoing ” and had not been completed . But Wray   testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee   said that the FBI submitted a partial report on Porter ’ s clearance last March and that the investigation was completed last July . Soon after   he added   the FBI received a request for a follow - up   which the bureau completed and provided last November . The FBI closed the file in January   and when it received additional information this month   “ we passed it on as well  ” Wray said . [‘ Very turbulent ’: Trump and White House consumed with turmoil amid abuse allegations ] At the White House   Sanders sought to square the conflicting timelines   arguing that even after the FBI closed its investigation   the presidential personnel office was still reviewing Porter ’ s case when he resigned last week . “ Clearly things happened after the FBI delivered this information to the White House that resulted in Porter ’ s case just pending for an extended period of time in the personnel office  ” said Ron Klain   a senior White House aide in the last two Democratic administrations . “ It was a deliberate decision to let him stay at the White House with this hanging over his head .” The fallout has left Kelly with diminished internal support and spawned intensified threats from those who hope to use the controversy to force him from his job . Several Kelly antagonists have sought to fan speculation that his position may be in imminent danger   noting that Trump has been seeking counsel from friends about who he might bring on as a new chief of staff . The president has floated replacing Kelly with either Gary Cohn   the director of the National Economic Council   or House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy ( R - Calif .) — though Trump has often sounded out friends about personnel changes that he ultimately does not make . Nonetheless   one foe described Kelly as “ well done  ” while another said he was in “ big league ” trouble . Anthony Scaramucci   who served as White House communications director for 10 days last summer until Kelly fired him   tweeted   “ Kelly must resign .” He continued : “ Domestic abuse is a red line . Covering up for it is indefensible .” White House infighting Some White House officials   who until recently spoke of Kelly with reverence   have found ways to distance themselves from their boss   including by refusing to personally vouch for his credibility . For the past two days   Sanders has acknowledged that the White House could have handled the  Porter  situation better   a sentiment first offered last week by her deputy   Raj Shah   and echoed by Vice President Pence . But Kelly   in comments to the Wall Street Journal on Monday   said   “ It was all done right .” Some of Kelly ’ s colleagues offered a more innocuous explanation for his missteps ; one senior White House official suggested that he may simply have been “ forgetful or inartful  ” rather than deliberately mendacious . [ Perspective : Sarah Huckabee Sanders is at her worst when she ’ s talking about respect for women ] On Tuesday   Sanders parried a number of sharp questions from reporters   offering only vague responses . She said at one point that her answers could only be as complete as the information she had been provided by her superiors — remarks widely interpreted as an attempt to distance herself from Kelly . “ Obviously the press team ’ s not going to be as read - in   maybe   as some other elements at a given moment on a variety of topics  ” Sanders said . “ But we relay the best and most accurate information that we have   and we get those from those individuals .” Inside the building   officials privately griped that Kelly and McGahn could have better managed the crisis by admitting mistakes   promising to overhaul the security clearance process and protecting the president . Instead   these people said   Kelly seemed to shirk blame   grumbling to at least one confidant that the communications office should be held partly responsible . In internal conversations   Kelly sounded defensive and complained that the media was overhyping the story   according to a senior White House official who spoke with him . But not all of Kelly ’ s team shared his view . During Wray ’ s testimony   another White House aide texted a Washington Post reporter   describing the moment as “ a killer .” When asked if Kelly could have been more transparent or truthful   that official wrote : “ In this White House   it ’ s simply not in our DNA . Truthful and transparent is great   but we don ’ t even have a coherent strategy to obfuscate .” Several White House aides described themselves as initially caught off guard by the allegations against  Porter    a Rhodes scholar with two degrees from Harvard who had established  himself  as a professional and competent force inside the West Wing . But as photos emerged showing  his  first ex - wife with a black eye — and as they listened to  his  explanation   which some found implausible — some officials said they became convinced that the two women were telling the truth . Ellen Nakashima and Shane Harris contributed to this report .
White House reels as FBI director contradicts official claims about alleged abuser
The White House ' s claims of no previous knowledge about domestic violence allegations against former staff secretary Rob Porter were challenged by FBI Director Christopher A. Wray ' s timeline of events. ( Jenny Starrs / The Washington Post ) The White House ' s claims of no previous knowledge about domestic violence allegations against former staff secretary Rob Porter were challenged by FBI Director Christopher A. Wray ' s timeline of events. ( Jenny Starrs / The Washington Post ) The White House struggled Tuesday to contain a widening crisis over its handling of domestic violence allegations against a senior official   as it reeled after sworn testimony by the FBI chief directly contradicted what President Trump ’ s aides had presented as the official version of events. FBI Director Christopher A. Wray told the Senate Intelligence Committee that the bureau had completed a background report on then - staff secretary Rob Porter last July and closed out the case entirely last month. Wray ’ s account is at odds with White House claims that the investigation required for Porter ’ s security clearance was “ ongoing ” until he left his job last week   after his two ex - wives publicly alleged physical and emotional abuse. The latest bout of turbulence is exacerbated by the administration ’ s reputation   earned over 13 chaotic months   for flouting institutional norms and misrepresenting facts to the public — a culture set by the president himself. The public relations fallout is further compounded by Trump ’ s own history of alleged sexual assault and his seeming reluctance to publicly condemn violence against women and give voice to the national # MeToo reckoning. The president has said little publicly about the Porter issue other than to praise the former aide for doing “ a very good job. ” But he has privately expressed frustration with the week - long fallout   peppering advisers and confidants with questions about the media coverage and how the controversy is playing for him personally. FBI Director Christopher A. Wray said Feb. 13 the FBI had submitted a partial report on former White House aide Rob Porter ’ s background check in March 2017 and a full investigation in late July to the White House. ( Reuters ) The Porter drama has become all - consuming   creating an atmosphere of chaos and infighting reminiscent of the “ Game of Thrones ” stage early in Trump ’ s presidency — and distracting from the administration ’ s budget and infrastructure agenda. Many aides blame Kelly Inside the West Wing   a growing number of aides blamed Trump ’ s second White House chief of staff   John F. Kelly   for the bungled handling of the allegations against Porter. Trump in recent days has begun musing about possible replacements   according to people with knowledge of the conversations. [ FBI director rebuts White House account of handling of ex - aide ’ s security clearance ] Asked by a reporter to assess Kelly ’ s standing with Trump after a week of troubling revelations   White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said that “ the president has confidence in his chief of staff. ” But Kelly does not enjoy the confidence of an increasing number of his subordinates   some of whom said they believe that the retired four - star Marine Corps general has misled them. Kelly is “ a big fat liar  ” said one White House official   who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share a candid opinion. “ To put it in terms the general would understand   his handling of the Porter scandal amounts to dereliction of duty. ” This portrait of the West Wing in turmoil is based on interviews with more than a dozen top White House officials and outside advisers and confidants   most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because they feared retribution. White House chief of staff John F. Kelly is under fire   even from some West Wing colleagues. ( Jabin Botsford / The Washington Post ) Kelly ’ s attempts at explaining his role   according to some aides   have included telling senior staff members last Friday to communicate a version of events many believed to be false   as well as telling at least one confidant that he has “ a good bulls --- detector ” and had long detected troubling characteristics in  Porter. But Kelly initially defended  Porter  last week as “ a man of true integrity and honor. ” And in recent weeks   Kelly was even considering giving  Porter  an expanded role in policy development   a potential promotion first reported by CNN. [ House Oversight is investigating the White House ’ s handling of  Rob Porter    Gowdy says ] “ Credibility is the coin of the realm for any White House chief of staff   and it ’ s especially important in a White House where truth was the first casualty and credibility has been the second  ” said Chris Whipple   who wrote a book about chiefs of staff. The internal animus is not limited to Kelly. White House counsel Donald McGahn and deputy chief of staff Joe Hagin are also facing scrutiny over how Porter managed to work at the White House — and hold an interim security clearance — for more than a year despite the allegations of abuse during his two marriages. Wray disputes account On Tuesday   Wray contradicted the White House ’ s account of when the bureau informed officials about the status of Porter ’ s security clearance investigation. White House officials had said that they were first contacted last summer by the FBI about Porter ’ s clearance   and that the investigation as of last week was “ ongoing ” and had not been completed. But Wray   testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee   said that the FBI submitted a partial report on Porter ’ s clearance last March and that the investigation was completed last July. Soon after   he added   the FBI received a request for a follow - up   which the bureau completed and provided last November. The FBI closed the file in January   and when it received additional information this month   “ we passed it on as well  ” Wray said. [‘ Very turbulent ’: Trump and White House consumed with turmoil amid abuse allegations ] At the White House   Sanders sought to square the conflicting timelines   arguing that even after the FBI closed its investigation   the presidential personnel office was still reviewing Porter ’ s case when he resigned last week. “ Clearly things happened after the FBI delivered this information to the White House that resulted in Porter ’ s case just pending for an extended period of time in the personnel office  ” said Ron Klain   a senior White House aide in the last two Democratic administrations. “ It was a deliberate decision to let him stay at the White House with this hanging over his head. ” The fallout has left Kelly with diminished internal support and spawned intensified threats from those who hope to use the controversy to force him from his job. Several Kelly antagonists have sought to fan speculation that his position may be in imminent danger   noting that Trump has been seeking counsel from friends about who he might bring on as a new chief of staff. The president has floated replacing Kelly with either Gary Cohn   the director of the National Economic Council   or House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy ( R - Calif. ) — though Trump has often sounded out friends about personnel changes that he ultimately does not make. Nonetheless   one foe described Kelly as “ well done  ” while another said he was in “ big league ” trouble. Anthony Scaramucci   who served as White House communications director for 10 days last summer until Kelly fired him   tweeted   “ Kelly must resign. ” He continued : “ Domestic abuse is a red line. Covering up for it is indefensible. ” White House infighting Some White House officials   who until recently spoke of Kelly with reverence   have found ways to distance themselves from their boss   including by refusing to personally vouch for his credibility. For the past two days   Sanders has acknowledged that the White House could have handled the  Porter  situation better   a sentiment first offered last week by her deputy   Raj Shah   and echoed by Vice President Pence. But Kelly   in comments to the Wall Street Journal on Monday   said   “ It was all done right. ” Some of Kelly ’ s colleagues offered a more innocuous explanation for his missteps ; one senior White House official suggested that he may simply have been “ forgetful or inartful  ” rather than deliberately mendacious. [ Perspective : Sarah Huckabee Sanders is at her worst when she ’ s talking about respect for women ] On Tuesday   Sanders parried a number of sharp questions from reporters   offering only vague responses. She said at one point that her answers could only be as complete as the information she had been provided by her superiors — remarks widely interpreted as an attempt to distance herself from Kelly. “ Obviously the press team ’ s not going to be as read - in   maybe   as some other elements at a given moment on a variety of topics  ” Sanders said. “ But we relay the best and most accurate information that we have   and we get those from those individuals. ” Inside the building   officials privately griped that Kelly and McGahn could have better managed the crisis by admitting mistakes   promising to overhaul the security clearance process and protecting the president. Instead   these people said   Kelly seemed to shirk blame   grumbling to at least one confidant that the communications office should be held partly responsible. In internal conversations   Kelly sounded defensive and complained that the media was overhyping the story   according to a senior White House official who spoke with him. But not all of Kelly ’ s team shared his view. During Wray ’ s testimony   another White House aide texted a Washington Post reporter   describing the moment as “ a killer. ” When asked if Kelly could have been more transparent or truthful   that official wrote : “ In this White House   it ’ s simply not in our DNA. Truthful and transparent is great   but we don ’ t even have a coherent strategy to obfuscate. ” Several White House aides described themselves as initially caught off guard by the allegations against  Porter    a Rhodes scholar with two degrees from Harvard who had established  himself  as a professional and competent force inside the West Wing. But as photos emerged showing  his  first ex - wife with a black eye — and as they listened to  his  explanation   which some found implausible — some officials said they became convinced that the two women were telling the truth. Ellen Nakashima and Shane Harris contributed to this report.