If there is one instant disqualifier of the credibility about a documentary that purports to explain Quantum Mechanics attach the name J.Z. Knight to it. If one wants more than to discard such a documentary as merely scientific illiteracy, take the next step and have J.Z. Knight fund the project.

My first sense that someone was trying to palm a card off the bottom of the deck was when NONE of the names of the experts featured were revealed during the film. Knight and her cadre of pretenders chose to give the names of these individuals in the closing credits--a cute little trick
I had never seen employed in any of the hundreds of documentaries I've watched.

Knight's reason for doing this was shamefully transparent. If her people named the experts who appeared as they appeared they would have had to mention her name and her credentials: she channelled a 35,000 year-old being named Ramtha, with all the scandals associated with that cult and the documentary would be summarily blown up.

Most disappointedly for me was, in the span of just a few days, learning that Joe Dispenza was involved with her (which explains his disproportionate amount of time in the film as a scientific expert.) and yesterday discovering he claims a few thousand years ago he was a savant tortured for spreading counterculture ideas while chained to a stone slab. After his release, Dispenza claims he retired to a cave.

I am totally mystified why people need to buy into such bleeping B.S. when a simple book like "The Magic of Believing" has thousands of people
(including the late, great entertainers Liberace and Phyllis Diller) claim that all their happiness, health, fame and fortune were acquired by practicing the simple methods Claude Bristol spells out. (One can download a condensed audio-version of this book on YouTube as well as an equally iconic very short booklet, "It works."

I suppose that science has become so authoritative that if you could cloak the most farfetched nonsense in the words of scientists, anything becomes more believable.

Thornton Wilder really nailed it when in his Pulitzer Prize winning play "Our Town" he had a character say, "Wherever you look with people there are layers and layers of foolishness."

"What the Bleep do we know?" is an avalanche of nonsense. How could it be otherwise when it is the fruit of one of the most accomplished and savvy charlatans of the past 30 years?
If there is one instant disqualifier of the credibility about a documentary that purports to explain Quantum Mechanics attach the name J. Z. Knight to it. If one wants more than to discard such a documentary as merely scientific illiteracy, take the next step and have J. Z. Knight fund the project. My first sense that someone was trying to palm a card off the bottom of the deck was when NONE of the names of the experts featured were revealed during the film. Knight and her cadre of pretenders chose to give the names of these individuals in the closing credits--a cute little trick
I had never seen employed in any of the hundreds of documentaries I've watched. Knight's reason for doing this was shamefully transparent. If her people named the experts who appeared as they appeared they would have had to mention her name and her credentials: she channelled a 35,000 year-old being named Ramtha, with all the scandals associated with that cult and the documentary would be summarily blown up. Most disappointedly for me was, in the span of just a few days, learning that Joe Dispenza was involved with her (which explains his disproportionate amount of time in the film as a scientific expert. ) and yesterday discovering he claims a few thousand years ago he was a savant tortured for spreading counterculture ideas while chained to a stone slab. After his release, Dispenza claims he retired to a cave. I am totally mystified why people need to buy into such bleeping B. S. when a simple book like "The Magic of Believing" has thousands of people
(including the late, great entertainers Liberace and Phyllis Diller) claim that all their happiness, health, fame and fortune were acquired by practicing the simple methods Claude Bristol spells out. (One can download a condensed audio-version of this book on YouTube as well as an equally iconic very short booklet, "It works. "

I suppose that science has become so authoritative that if you could cloak the most farfetched nonsense in the words of scientists, anything becomes more believable. Thornton Wilder really nailed it when in his Pulitzer Prize winning play "Our Town" he had a character say, "Wherever you look with people there are layers and layers of foolishness. "

"What the Bleep do we know? " is an avalanche of nonsense. How could it be otherwise when it is the fruit of one of the most accomplished and savvy charlatans of the past 30 years?