This set of twelve 5.5oz cans of cubed cat food in gravy is enough to provide multiple servings for average sized kitties (or food for a day for a big cat). If they'll eat the stuff, that is.

Homogenous cubes of food sit in a moderately thick gravy. The cubes are just about dog-food sized, a good 1/2-inch square. That marketing photo with the food in the spoon? Highly misleading, it has to be a large serving spoon.

My two middle-aged female cats will eagerly devour the gravy. Pro-tip: rinse the can out and use that to add volume to the gravy and more water to kitty's intake.
But the cubes? Nearly complete disinterest after licking off the liquid, even with coaxing and re-moistening. This matches my experience with (many) previous times when I've tried to get them to eat Science Diet (in some variations, they won't even eat the gravy). They're generally good eaters, but not starving-- they always have kibble available. Wet food is more of a treat and to make sure they eat "enough". Cats are known for finicky eating, so your experience may vary from mine, especially if you have very hungry animals.

I started feeding my first cats Science Diet back in the 1990s when it was one of the few premium brands available, but was already a well-known (and advertised) name in Veterinary circles. Once newer brands and formulas were available, I realized Science Diet was just coasting on its name and the idea of ingredients being important had long since been discovered by the rest of the industry.

More so, I noticed my cats (both current and past) becoming less and less interested in the Science Diet wet food with each successive iteration and re-launch. Some of those (many of those) were awful-- wet foods that had large quantities of vegetables visible, "gluten-free" product-lines, several series of natural recipes that my cats wouldn't touch, and so on. It was clearly the triumph of marketing over science at Science Diet's parent company. Even the sealed pouches of "premium dinners" barely drew feline interest. Maybe somebody forgot to tell marketing that the QA team needed to include cats? Or stop having the dog side of the business formulate your cat food...

When Science Diet changed the formulas of even their dry food (of which I also tried many variants), I switched brands...and noticed my cats consistently became more interested in eating, and more energetic. Probably not a coincidence. Now S.D. "light" kibble is their only product I still buy regularly.

The relatively wholesome ingredients are the only real positive I can find here:  "Meat" is the first 3-4 ingredients in all 3 variants, followed by wheat products, and there's neither carrageenan nor food coloring.

After my past experiences with Science Diet (and trying far too many new marketing variations), I'm convinced Science Diet is now an undistinguished, average food, and my cats do not approve. Combined with the oversized pieces that have yet to appeal to any of five kitties I've had, it's only recommended for those of you feeding XL-sized cats. Everybody else can do better.
This set of twelve 5. 5oz cans of cubed cat food in gravy is enough to provide multiple servings for average sized kitties (or food for a day for a big cat). If they'll eat the stuff, that is. Homogenous cubes of food sit in a moderately thick gravy. The cubes are just about dog-food sized, a good 1/2-inch square. That marketing photo with the food in the spoon? Highly misleading, it has to be a large serving spoon. My two middle-aged female cats will eagerly devour the gravy. Pro-tip: rinse the can out and use that to add volume to the gravy and more water to kitty's intake. But the cubes? Nearly complete disinterest after licking off the liquid, even with coaxing and re-moistening. This matches my experience with (many) previous times when I've tried to get them to eat Science Diet (in some variations, they won't even eat the gravy). They're generally good eaters, but not starving-- they always have kibble available. Wet food is more of a treat and to make sure they eat "enough". Cats are known for finicky eating, so your experience may vary from mine, especially if you have very hungry animals. I started feeding my first cats Science Diet back in the 1990s when it was one of the few premium brands available, but was already a well-known (and advertised) name in Veterinary circles. Once newer brands and formulas were available, I realized Science Diet was just coasting on its name and the idea of ingredients being important had long since been discovered by the rest of the industry. More so, I noticed my cats (both current and past) becoming less and less interested in the Science Diet wet food with each successive iteration and re-launch. Some of those (many of those) were awful-- wet foods that had large quantities of vegetables visible, "gluten-free" product-lines, several series of natural recipes that my cats wouldn't touch, and so on. It was clearly the triumph of marketing over science at Science Diet's parent company. Even the sealed pouches of "premium dinners" barely drew feline interest. Maybe somebody forgot to tell marketing that the QA team needed to include cats? Or stop having the dog side of the business formulate your cat food... When Science Diet changed the formulas of even their dry food (of which I also tried many variants), I switched brands... and noticed my cats consistently became more interested in eating, and more energetic. Probably not a coincidence. Now S. D. "light" kibble is their only product I still buy regularly. The relatively wholesome ingredients are the only real positive I can find here:  "Meat" is the first 3-4 ingredients in all 3 variants, followed by wheat products, and there's neither carrageenan nor food coloring. After my past experiences with Science Diet (and trying far too many new marketing variations), I'm convinced Science Diet is now an undistinguished, average food, and my cats do not approve. Combined with the oversized pieces that have yet to appeal to any of five kitties I've had, it's only recommended for those of you feeding XL-sized cats. Everybody else can do better.