I think that the most disturbing aspect of the situation described in first letter is the transactional nature of the relationship between the gay couple and the extended family that they essentially purchased. That the “family” (goods and services, ie playing the role of extended family) isn’t perfect and that the uncle wants to discharge the service providers for failure to perform properly is essentially the nature of the question. Part of the answer is in pointing out the idiocy of the uncles expectation in the first place. They (him) created the situation in the first place and then benefited from it for years and now that the “family” has evolved into a more troublesome version it’s time to move on. The second most disturbing aspect is that the gay couple are essentially so wealthy that changing the conditions of the arrangement isn’t predicated on need as much as dissatisfaction on the part of one individual. It’s like buying a puppy and whining that it grew into a dog that hasn’t been properly housebroken and damages the furniture. He has had literally years to change the dynamics shaping today’s results and instead got the expected benefits of a extended family without the work needed to make it a long term viable situation. Wealthy people believe they can buy anything, no, a functional family isn’t something you can buy.

I think that the most disturbing aspect of the situation described in first letter is the transactional nature of the relationship between the gay couple and the extended family that they essentially purchased. That the “family” (goods and services, ie playing the role of extended family) isn’t perfect and that the uncle wants to discharge the service providers for failure to perform properly is essentially the nature of the question. Part of the answer is in pointing out the idiocy of the uncles expectation in the first place. They (him) created the situation in the first place and then benefited from it for years and now that the “family” has evolved into a more troublesome version it’s time to move on. The second most disturbing aspect is that the gay couple are essentially so wealthy that changing the conditions of the arrangement isn’t predicated on need as much as dissatisfaction on the part of one individual. It’s like buying a puppy and whining that it grew into a dog that hasn’t been properly housebroken and damages the furniture. He has had literally years to change the dynamics shaping today’s results and instead got the expected benefits of a extended family without the work needed to make it a long term viable situation. Wealthy people believe they can buy anything, no, a functional family isn’t something you can buy.

user
no
assistant