Thank you Ms Khan for going after non-competes.  You are spot on with your assessment of this legal manipulation of a person's right to work.I sincerely hope that you are also trying to eliminate binding arbitration clauses in settling disagreements between employees and employers.  That is another of the very oppressive means of controlling employees to the advantage of the company or other organization.While you're at it, how about enforcing anti trust as it was intended to be enforced?Same for extended patents that do not much other than extend protection for derivative products made from an already protected technology platform?You are in a target rich environment.Keep reaching out to everyday people and put these issues into the public forum, in plain language, and start re-building the trust of the American people in our system of regulated capitalism ... before the hypocrisy overwhelms us all.

Thank you Ms Khan for going after non-competes.  You are spot on with your assessment of this legal manipulation of a person's right to work.I sincerely hope that you are also trying to eliminate binding arbitration clauses in settling disagreements between employees and employers.  That is another of the very oppressive means of controlling employees to the advantage of the company or other organization.While you're at it, how about enforcing anti trust as it was intended to be enforced?Same for extended patents that do not much other than extend protection for derivative products made from an already protected technology platform?You are in a target rich environment.Keep reaching out to everyday people and put these issues into the public forum, in plain language, and start re-building the trust of the American people in our system of regulated capitalism ... before the hypocrisy overwhelms us all.

user
no
assistant