If Yeshiva’s religious character is “plain and obvious,” why are they getting $230 million in taxpayer money that could have been better spent at a school that does not discriminate? If they have a right to discriminate, then they are in the wrong country and can be discriminated against.YU would operate “within the framework of Halakha,” or Jewish religious law. So perhaps we should also have taxpayers subsidize Madrasas that operate under Sharia law and Christians schools that operate under Old Testament law, ...Indeed, religious leaders choose to "interpret" their religious texts - so their dogma is no longer absolute but a choice. They choose to discriminate and hate and use their religious choice as inviolable justification.Taxpayers are effectively discriminated against by religious organizations, freeloading off taxpayer paid for services plus forcing taxpayers to also subsidize their religious indoctrination efforts too, regardless of their hateful use of religious beliefs as a pretext to discriminate and hate the taxpayer in exchange for their money!Religions are funded for doing little and profit enormously, like the idle wealthy do, evading taxes and getting politicians to transfer enormous wealth sums from society into their coffers. Actual taxpayers have no choice but to pay their taxes.Freedom of religion does not mean they have a right to force me to pay them through taxation or be subjected to their dogma. Stop weaponizing religious freedom!

If Yeshiva’s religious character is “plain and obvious,” why are they getting $230 million in taxpayer money that could have been better spent at a school that does not discriminate? If they have a right to discriminate, then they are in the wrong country and can be discriminated against.YU would operate “within the framework of Halakha,” or Jewish religious law. So perhaps we should also have taxpayers subsidize Madrasas that operate under Sharia law and Christians schools that operate under Old Testament law, ...Indeed, religious leaders choose to "interpret" their religious texts - so their dogma is no longer absolute but a choice. They choose to discriminate and hate and use their religious choice as inviolable justification.Taxpayers are effectively discriminated against by religious organizations, freeloading off taxpayer paid for services plus forcing taxpayers to also subsidize their religious indoctrination efforts too, regardless of their hateful use of religious beliefs as a pretext to discriminate and hate the taxpayer in exchange for their money!Religions are funded for doing little and profit enormously, like the idle wealthy do, evading taxes and getting politicians to transfer enormous wealth sums from society into their coffers. Actual taxpayers have no choice but to pay their taxes.Freedom of religion does not mean they have a right to force me to pay them through taxation or be subjected to their dogma. Stop weaponizing religious freedom!

user
yes
assistant