LibertyLover I would add that you train their forces to use them, given their advance nature. This takes time and suggest an extended period of wafare. Problem is there is a lack of consensus among the NATO members to take this on and I would say among those with the means closest to arena - France, Germany, Italy, Spain. It should have started months ago. It has no doubt been debated among strategists in the various armed forces and political structures. If not, a failing. The British seem to be the closest to this reasoning so far, though with some hesitance, in my estimation. I hope to believe that the Ukrainians are not standing still and are working on their own more powerful weaponry given the shortfalls west of them.

LibertyLover I would add that you train their forces to use them, given their advance nature. This takes time and suggest an extended period of wafare. Problem is there is a lack of consensus among the NATO members to take this on and I would say among those with the means closest to arena - France, Germany, Italy, Spain. It should have started months ago. It has no doubt been debated among strategists in the various armed forces and political structures. If not, a failing. The British seem to be the closest to this reasoning so far, though with some hesitance, in my estimation. I hope to believe that the Ukrainians are not standing still and are working on their own more powerful weaponry given the shortfalls west of them.

user
no
assistant