Will. It may seem like this partnership is a good thing but without knowing the details of how it would work, I would say we are not Canada and there are huge opportunities for problems. Cartels have a lot of $ and I can see how easy it would be for them to worm their way into this process with far reaching consequences.I also do not believe NGO s should be involved in the immigration issue which should be one hundred percent handled by the government which could, within that system, set up a cadre of volunteers to assist resettlement.I would add, too, that non profits should not be financed by the government, period, through tax exemptions and anyone donating to their preferred cause should bear the total cost.Let government do government's job.  There is way too much private intrusion into the responsibility of government.It seems to me that this change is more a distraction and an attempt to regain and change the narrative for what is an immigration system that has primarily failed due to the failure to enforce the laws we have because of fear of alienating one group or another.This policy change is simply a euphemism that seeks to sideline the real solutions such as  E Verify, fines for businesses and immediate expulsion for irregular entry.

Will. It may seem like this partnership is a good thing but without knowing the details of how it would work, I would say we are not Canada and there are huge opportunities for problems. Cartels have a lot of $ and I can see how easy it would be for them to worm their way into this process with far reaching consequences.I also do not believe NGO s should be involved in the immigration issue which should be one hundred percent handled by the government which could, within that system, set up a cadre of volunteers to assist resettlement.I would add, too, that non profits should not be financed by the government, period, through tax exemptions and anyone donating to their preferred cause should bear the total cost.Let government do government's job.  There is way too much private intrusion into the responsibility of government.It seems to me that this change is more a distraction and an attempt to regain and change the narrative for what is an immigration system that has primarily failed due to the failure to enforce the laws we have because of fear of alienating one group or another.This policy change is simply a euphemism that seeks to sideline the real solutions such as  E Verify, fines for businesses and immediate expulsion for irregular entry.

user
yes
assistant