OneView You conflate issues that are separable.Nobody says workers cannot be fired.  This is not Europe with its ridiculous labor laws.  As we all know, workers in the US can be fired with far less protection than senior executives.  That's not even close to the issue.There is no similarity between the service academies requirement and a company's investment in its workers whatsoever.  None.  That's a red herring given the completely dissimilar functions of the two.While it is true that employers invest in employees to improve their skills, the employees in turn generate wealth for the companies while being trained.  NO company ANYwhere trains employees as though they were students without other responsibilities.  All acquire job experience with the employer.  Both benefit from the relationship.Non competes and the like serve only to benefit companies and lawyers.

OneView You conflate issues that are separable.Nobody says workers cannot be fired.  This is not Europe with its ridiculous labor laws.  As we all know, workers in the US can be fired with far less protection than senior executives.  That's not even close to the issue.There is no similarity between the service academies requirement and a company's investment in its workers whatsoever.  None.  That's a red herring given the completely dissimilar functions of the two.While it is true that employers invest in employees to improve their skills, the employees in turn generate wealth for the companies while being trained.  NO company ANYwhere trains employees as though they were students without other responsibilities.  All acquire job experience with the employer.  Both benefit from the relationship.Non competes and the like serve only to benefit companies and lawyers.

user
yes
assistant