what I don't understand is how all the falsehoods were not discovered, disclosed before the election of Santos.  Local media claims to have done its job in discovery of the falsehoods; presumaby Suozzi did his job of publicizing the falsehoods.  In a blue leaning district, one would think those two actions would have been enough to prevent his election.  Now, post election, all is out in the open and it is deeply troubling.  Someone tell me why, before the vote, this information was not sufficient to prevent Santos.   I didn't know that Santos had run in 2020.  So there have been 2 election cycles and we are just learning of the lies now?  Seems to me folks have been asleep at the switch.

what I don't understand is how all the falsehoods were not discovered, disclosed before the election of Santos.  Local media claims to have done its job in discovery of the falsehoods; presumaby Suozzi did his job of publicizing the falsehoods.  In a blue leaning district, one would think those two actions would have been enough to prevent his election.  Now, post election, all is out in the open and it is deeply troubling.  Someone tell me why, before the vote, this information was not sufficient to prevent Santos.   I didn't know that Santos had run in 2020.  So there have been 2 election cycles and we are just learning of the lies now?  Seems to me folks have been asleep at the switch.

user
no
assistant