▁his ▁per verse ▁approach ". ▁They ▁have ▁drawn ▁par alle ls ▁to ▁the ▁protest s ▁over ▁Dan ish ▁Cart o ons ▁and ▁the ▁fact ▁that ▁the ▁P ain ter ▁had ▁no ▁such ▁cre ative ▁works ▁regarding ▁his ▁own ▁faith . ▁ ▁In ▁April ▁ 2 0 0 4 , ▁the ▁Del hi ▁High ▁Court ▁has ▁found ▁H uss ain ▁guilty ▁of ▁hur ting ▁of ▁religious ▁sent iments . ▁The ▁Honor able ▁Justice ▁Kap oor ▁states , ▁ ▁" If ▁one ▁has ▁been ▁granted ▁un limited ▁freedom , ▁one ▁is ▁required ▁or ▁expected ▁to ▁use ▁it ▁for ▁good ▁purpose ▁and ▁not ▁with ▁mal icious ▁intention , ▁to ▁def ame ▁or ▁deg rade ▁religious ▁de ities ▁may ▁be ▁myth ological , ▁as ▁these ▁imm ort als ▁are ▁held ▁in ▁highest ▁este em ▁and ▁over ▁a ▁period ▁become ▁part ▁of ▁one ' s ▁day ▁to ▁day ▁religious ▁life ▁to ▁such ▁an ▁extent ▁that ▁anything ▁ad verse ▁said ▁or ▁printed ▁or ▁painted ▁hur ts ▁the ▁religious ▁feelings ▁imm ens ely . ▁Any ▁ob jection able , ▁de mean ing ▁car ic ature ▁or ▁painting ▁of ▁religious ▁de ities ▁or ▁gods ▁or ▁god d esses ▁of ▁any ▁particular ▁religion ▁creates ▁d ish arm ony ▁and ▁ill ▁will ▁amongst ▁different ▁communities . ▁Even ▁if ▁it ▁is ▁pres umed ▁that ▁such ▁a ▁painting ▁is ▁a ▁piece ▁of ▁art ▁still ▁one ▁cannot ▁be ▁ob liv ious ▁of ▁the ▁fact ▁that ▁dep iction ▁of ▁these ▁de ities ▁or ▁god d esses ▁in ▁full ▁n ud ity ▁comes ▁within ▁the ▁m isch ief