land ▁to ▁New port ▁News , ▁Virginia . ▁US   6 2 ▁would ▁also ▁be ▁extended ▁from ▁O z ark ▁to ▁Spring field , ▁Missouri . ▁Field s ▁was ▁not ▁pleased ▁with ▁the ▁US   6 2 ▁extension ▁and ▁continued ▁to ▁campaign ▁for ▁US   6 0 ▁to ▁be ▁rout ed ▁through ▁Kentucky . ▁Field s ▁later ▁returned ▁to ▁A AS HO ▁with ▁support ▁from ▁Kentucky ' s ▁Cong r essional ▁deleg ation ▁and ▁presented ▁his ▁argument ▁to ▁A AS HO ' s ▁chairman ▁Thomas ▁H . ▁Mac Donald ▁on ▁January ▁ 2 5 , ▁ 1 9 2 6 . ▁Mac Donald ▁agreed ▁with ▁Field s ' ▁argument ▁and ▁A AS HO ▁subsequently ▁ex changed ▁the ▁number ▁of ▁the ▁Los ▁Angeles ▁to ▁Chicago ▁route ▁with ▁the ▁New port ▁News ▁to ▁Spring field ▁route . ▁ ▁Following ▁the ▁change , ▁A very ▁opposed ▁removing ▁" US   6 0 " ▁from ▁the ▁Los ▁Angeles ▁to ▁Chicago ▁route , ▁stating ▁the ▁state ▁Oklahoma ▁had ▁already ▁under g one ▁extensive ▁prepar ation ▁for ▁the ▁" US   6 0 " ▁design ation , ▁producing ▁official ▁sign age ▁and ▁printing ▁maps ▁in ▁anticip ation ▁for ▁the ▁new ▁number . ▁A very ▁was ▁further ▁ups et ▁that ▁the ▁decision ▁to ▁re - design ate ▁the ▁Chicago ▁to ▁Los ▁Angeles ▁route ▁had ▁been ▁done ▁without ▁his ▁knowledge ▁or ▁consent . ▁Official s ▁from ▁Missouri ▁also ▁heavily ▁protest ed ▁the ▁change ▁in ▁number ing . ▁A AS HO ▁officials ▁re but ted ▁against ▁A very ' s ▁compla ints