▁condem ned ▁and ▁ex iled ▁him . ▁F lav ian ▁sent ▁a ▁full ▁account ▁to ▁Pope ▁Leo ▁I . ▁Although ▁it ▁had ▁been ▁accident ally ▁delayed , ▁Leo ▁wrote ▁a ▁comp end ious ▁explanation ▁of ▁the ▁whole ▁doctrine ▁involved , ▁and ▁sent ▁it ▁to ▁F lav ian ▁as ▁a ▁formal ▁and ▁author itative ▁decision ▁of ▁the ▁question . ▁ ▁E ut ych es ▁appe aled ▁against ▁the ▁decision , ▁label ing ▁F lav ian ▁a ▁N est or ian , ▁and ▁received ▁the ▁support ▁of ▁Pope ▁Dios cor us ▁I ▁of ▁Alexand ria . ▁John ▁Anthony ▁McG uck in ▁sees ▁an ▁" inn ate ▁rival ry " ▁between ▁the ▁Se es ▁of ▁Alexand ria ▁and ▁Constantin ople . ▁Dios cur us , ▁im it ating ▁his ▁prede cess ors ▁in ▁assuming ▁a ▁prim acy ▁over ▁Constantin ople , ▁held ▁his ▁own ▁syn od ▁which ▁ann ul led ▁the ▁sentence ▁of ▁F lav ian , ▁and ▁absol ved ▁E ut ych es . ▁ ▁" L atro cin ium " ▁of ▁E ph es us ▁ ▁Through ▁the ▁influence ▁of ▁the ▁court ▁official ▁Ch rys aph ius , ▁god son ▁of ▁E ut ych es , ▁in ▁ 4 4 9 , ▁the ▁compet ing ▁claims ▁between ▁the ▁Patri arch s ▁of ▁Constantin ople ▁and ▁Alexand ria ▁led ▁Emperor ▁The odos ius ▁II ▁to ▁call ▁a ▁council ▁which ▁was ▁held ▁in ▁E ph es us ▁in ▁ 4 4 9 , ▁with ▁Dios cor us ▁pres iding . ▁ ▁Pope ▁Leo ▁sent ▁four ▁leg