ated ▁Ohio ▁election ▁law . ▁The ▁O EC ▁ruled ▁in ▁D rie haus ' ▁favor ▁in ▁a ▁probable ▁cause ▁hearing ▁on ▁October ▁ 1 4 , ▁ 2 0 1 0 . ▁ ▁In ▁response , ▁the ▁S BA ▁List ▁asked ▁a ▁federal ▁judge ▁to ▁issue ▁an ▁inj unction ▁against ▁the ▁O EC ▁on ▁the ▁grounds ▁that ▁the ▁law ▁at ▁issue ▁st if les ▁free ▁speech ▁and ▁that ▁its ▁ad s ▁were ▁based ▁on ▁the ▁group ’ s ▁own ▁interpretation ▁of ▁the ▁law . ▁The ▁American ▁Civil ▁Libert ies ▁Union ▁of ▁Ohio ▁file d ▁an ▁ 1 8 - page ▁am icus ▁brief ▁on ▁the ▁S BA ▁List ' s ▁beh alf , ▁arg uing ▁that ▁the ▁Ohio ▁law ▁in ▁question ▁is ▁" un const itution ally ▁vague " ▁and ▁has ▁a ▁" ch illing " ▁effect ▁on ▁the ▁S BA ▁List ' s ▁right ▁to ▁freedom ▁of ▁speech . ▁A ▁federal ▁judge ▁rejected ▁the ▁S BA ▁List ' s ▁federal ▁law suit ▁on ▁ab st ention ▁grounds ▁and ▁allowed ▁D rie haus ' s ▁O EC ▁compla int ▁to ▁move ▁forward . ▁ ▁After ▁the ▁O EC ▁compla int ▁was ▁file d , ▁the ▁S BA ▁List ▁began ▁air ing ▁a ▁radio ▁ad ▁in ▁D rie haus ' s ▁district ▁in ▁which ▁Mar jor ie ▁D ann en fel ser ▁stated ▁that ▁the ▁group ▁"[ w ould ] ▁not ▁be ▁sil enced ▁or ▁int im id ated " ▁by ▁D rie haus ' s ▁legal ▁action . ▁D rie haus ▁persu aded