e al ▁for ▁Ontario ▁found ▁that ▁a ▁det ention ▁occurred ▁when ▁Mr . ▁Grant ▁began ▁making ▁inc rimin ating ▁statements , ▁and ▁since ▁there ▁were ▁no ▁reasonable ▁grounds ▁to ▁det ain ▁Mr . ▁Grant , ▁section ▁ 9 ▁of ▁the ▁Char ter ▁was ▁in fr ing ed . ▁App lying ▁the ▁Collins ▁test , ▁the ▁related ▁Still man ▁test , ▁and ▁other ▁subsequent ▁juris pr ud ence , ▁the ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al ▁found ▁that ▁ad mission ▁of ▁the ▁fire arm ▁would ▁not ▁und uly ▁und erm ine ▁the ▁fair ness ▁of ▁the ▁trial . ▁As ▁a ▁result , ▁they ▁would ▁not ▁have ▁ex cluded ▁the ▁fire arm , ▁and ▁the ▁conv ict ions ▁were ▁not ▁over turn ed . ▁The ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al ▁also ▁noted ▁that ▁moving ▁a ▁fire arm ▁from ▁one ▁place ▁to ▁another ▁et ▁the ▁definition ▁of ▁" trans fer ". ▁ ▁Re asons ▁of ▁the ▁court ▁The ▁majority ▁judgment ▁was ▁given ▁by ▁Mc L ach lin ▁C J ▁and ▁Char ron ▁J . ▁ ▁Se ctions ▁ 9 ▁and ▁ 1 0 ▁The ▁majority ▁found ▁that ▁" det ention " ▁refers ▁to ▁a ▁susp ension ▁of ▁an ▁individual ' s ▁liberty ▁interest ▁by ▁a ▁significant ▁physical ▁or ▁psych ological ▁rest raint . ▁Psych ological ▁det ention ▁is ▁established ▁either ▁when ▁the ▁individual ▁has ▁a ▁legal ▁oblig ation ▁to ▁comp ly ▁with ▁the ▁restrict ive ▁request ▁or ▁demand ▁or ▁when ▁a ▁reasonable ▁person ▁would ▁conclude ▁by ▁reason ▁of ▁the ▁state ' s ▁conduct ▁that ▁they ▁had ▁no