▁movement , ▁the ▁flow ▁and ▁transformation ▁of ▁a ▁disease ▁state ▁( Gest alt ), ▁not ▁just ▁an ▁abstract ▁image . ▁H ahn emann ▁also ▁had ▁a ▁Go ethe an ▁understanding ▁of ▁the ▁sequ ential ▁nature ▁or ▁unfold ing ▁of ▁a ▁disease ▁phenomen on . ▁ ▁In ▁H ahn emann ' s ▁distinction ▁between ▁the ▁two ▁sides ▁of ▁the ▁Leb ensk raft ▁– ▁the ▁sust ent ive ▁or ▁Er halt ung sk raft ▁and ▁the ▁gener ative ▁or ▁Er zeug ung sk raft ▁( B ild ung str ieb ), ▁we ▁find ▁the ▁polar ▁logic ▁identified ▁in ▁Go ethe ' s ▁Ch rom at ology ▁– ▁‘ the ▁suffer ings ▁and ▁de eds ▁of ▁light ’ ▁via ▁a ▁tur bid ▁medium , ▁in ▁the ▁struggle ▁between ▁light ▁energy ▁( L icht ) ▁and ▁the ▁now ▁identified ▁' dark ' ▁energy ▁( F inst ern is ). ▁We ▁also ▁find ▁this ▁polar ity , ▁as ▁well ▁as ▁Go ethe ' s ▁distinction ▁between ▁the ▁spectrum ▁of ▁dark ▁and ▁of ▁light , ▁in ▁the ▁distinction ▁H ahn emann ▁made ▁between ▁primary ▁or ▁t onic ▁disease ▁( based ▁on ▁a ▁super - sens ible ▁knowing ▁of ▁psych ic ▁states ▁involving ▁alter ations ▁in ▁circumstances , ▁occurr ents ▁and ▁behav iors ▁via ▁the ▁Go ethe an ▁Gem üt ▁or ▁super - sens ible ▁cogn itive ▁organ ) ▁and ▁secondary ▁or ▁path ic ▁disease ▁( based ▁on ▁the ▁sensible ▁manifest ation ▁of ▁life ▁energy ▁at ▁the ▁som atic ▁level ▁in ▁terms ▁of ▁feelings , ▁functions ▁and ▁sens ations ,