▁Up an ish ads ▁that ▁establish es ▁it , ▁as ▁between ▁a ▁thing ▁to ▁be ▁known ▁and ▁that ▁which ▁tells ▁of ▁it . p . 1 6 ▁▁▁ ▁s ank ara ▁states ▁that ▁the ▁notion ▁of ▁a ▁mult itude ▁of ▁sou ls ▁is ▁valid ▁only ▁at ▁the ▁level ▁of ▁the ▁empir ical ▁world . ▁While ▁the ▁At man ▁stays ▁within ▁the ▁limits ▁of ▁the ▁body , ▁emot ions ▁and ▁intellect , ▁there ▁cannot ▁be ▁any ▁dissol ution , ▁any ▁absolute ▁unity ▁( s ar var th ā - ▁a ik y am ) ▁with ▁Bra h man ; ▁the ▁soul ▁is ▁only ▁the ▁reflection ▁of ▁the ▁higher ▁ ā t man . ▁There ▁is ▁only ▁one ▁reality . ▁That ▁about ▁which ▁the ▁cogn ition ▁does ▁not ▁change ▁is ▁sat ▁– ▁real ▁and ▁that ▁about ▁which ▁cogn ition ▁keeps ▁changing ▁or ▁is ▁neg ated ▁is ▁as at ▁– ▁un real ; ▁the ▁At man ▁or ▁Bra h man ▁alone ▁being ▁un change able ▁and ▁un - neg atable ▁is ▁the ▁only ▁sat ▁or ▁Re ality . ▁ ▁Ob jections ▁ ▁According ▁to ▁Mad hav ach ary a , ▁a ik y am ▁cannot ▁be ▁real ▁at ▁all ; ▁if ▁it ▁were , ▁the ▁absol ut ism ▁would ▁have ▁van ished . ▁The ▁Ab solute ▁is ▁the ▁only ▁reality , ▁a ik y am ▁cannot ▁be ▁another ▁reality . ▁And , ▁Nag ar j una ▁explains ▁– ▁if ▁there ▁were ▁to ▁be ▁identity ▁of ▁cause ▁and ▁effect , ▁then ▁there ▁would ▁be ▁on eness ▁of