▁deliber ations , ▁as ▁he ▁also ▁did ▁in ▁Pl anned ▁Parent hood ▁v . ▁Case y , ▁saying ▁that ▁his ▁draft ▁majority ▁opinion ▁u ph old ing ▁the ▁prayer ▁exercise ▁" look ed ▁quite ▁wrong ." ▁Instead , ▁Kennedy ▁wrote ▁an ▁opinion ▁that ▁rep udi ated ▁the ▁school ▁district ' s ▁main ▁arguments . ▁He ▁found ▁fault ▁with ▁Princi pal ▁Lee ' s ▁decision ▁to ▁give ▁the ▁ra bbi ▁who ▁was ▁planning ▁to ▁offer ▁the ▁gradu ation ▁inv ocation ▁a ▁pam ph let ▁on ▁compos ing ▁pray ers ▁for ▁civ ic ▁occasions : ▁ ▁Through ▁these ▁means , ▁the ▁principal ▁directed ▁and ▁controlled ▁the ▁content ▁of ▁the ▁pray ers . ▁Even ▁if ▁the ▁only ▁san ction ▁for ▁ign oring ▁the ▁instructions ▁were ▁that ▁the ▁ra bbi ▁would ▁not ▁be ▁invited ▁back , ▁we ▁think ▁no ▁religious ▁representative ▁who ▁val ued ▁his ▁or ▁her ▁continued ▁reputation ▁and ▁effect iveness ▁in ▁the ▁community ▁would ▁in cur ▁the ▁State ' s ▁dis ple asure ▁in ▁this ▁regard . ▁It ▁is ▁a ▁corner stone ▁principle ▁of ▁our ▁Est ab lish ment ▁Cla use ▁juris pr ud ence ▁that ▁it ▁is ▁no ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁business ▁of ▁government ▁to ▁compose ▁official ▁pray ers ▁for ▁any ▁group ▁of ▁the ▁American ▁people ▁to ▁rec ite ▁as ▁a ▁part ▁of ▁a ▁religious ▁program ▁carried ▁on ▁by ▁government , ▁and ▁that ▁is ▁what ▁the ▁school ▁officials ▁attempted ▁to ▁do . ▁ ▁Kennedy ▁also ▁noted ▁that ▁the ▁non sect arian ▁nature ▁of ▁the ▁prayer ▁was ▁no ▁defense , ▁as ▁the ▁Est ab lish