ser ting ▁juris diction ▁over ▁private ▁property ▁without ▁a ▁hearing ▁and ▁without ▁jud icial ▁review . ▁In ▁a ▁un anim ous ▁opinion , ▁the ▁Court ▁s ided ▁with ▁PL F ▁and ▁the ▁S ack et ts , ▁r uling ▁that ▁E PA ' s ▁comp liance ▁orders ▁are ▁subject ▁to ▁immediate ▁jud icial ▁review ▁under ▁the ▁Administr ative ▁Pro cedure ▁Act ▁( AP A ). ▁Ko ont z ▁v . ▁St . ▁Joh ns ▁River ▁Water ▁Management ▁District ▁( 2 0 1 3 ): ▁The ▁Court ▁considered ▁the ▁issue ▁of ▁whether ▁the ▁N oll an ▁and ▁Dol an ▁ne x us ▁limitation ▁and ▁proportional ity ▁test ▁apply ▁to ▁an ▁ex action ▁in ▁the ▁form ▁of ▁a ▁government ▁demand ▁that ▁the ▁permit ▁applic ant ▁make ▁off - site ▁improvements ; ▁and ▁whether ▁these ▁same ▁N oll an ▁and ▁Dol an ▁do ctr ines ▁extend ▁to ▁permit ▁ex actions , ▁where ▁the ▁permit ▁has ▁been ▁denied ▁due ▁to ▁the ▁applic ant ' s ▁re jection ▁of ▁that ▁ex action . ▁The ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁found ▁in ▁favor ▁of ▁the ▁property ▁owner ▁on ▁June ▁ 2 5 , ▁ 2 0 1 3 . ▁U . S . ▁Army ▁Corps ▁of ▁Engine ers ▁v . ▁Haw ke ▁Co ., ▁Inc . ▁( 2 0 1 6 ): ▁The ▁Court ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁Army ▁Corps ▁of ▁Engine ers ’ ▁juris dict ional ▁determ ination ▁that ▁the ▁property ▁in ▁question ▁constit uted ▁“ water ▁of ▁the ▁United ▁States ” ▁was ▁a ▁final ▁ag ency ▁action ▁subject ▁to ▁jud icial