ic ism ▁of ▁the ▁Act ▁included ▁compla ints ▁about ▁the ▁range ▁of ▁restrictions ▁that ▁could ▁be ▁im posed , ▁the ▁use ▁of ▁closed ▁proceed ings ▁and ▁special ▁advoc ates ▁to ▁hear ▁secret ▁evidence ▁against ▁the ▁d eta ine e , ▁and ▁the ▁possibility ▁that ▁evidence ▁against ▁d eta ine es ▁may ▁include ▁evidence ▁obtained ▁in ▁other ▁countries ▁by ▁tort ure . ▁ ▁Ren ew al ▁Due ▁to ▁the ▁extremely ▁swift ▁passage ▁of ▁the ▁Act ▁through ▁Parliament ▁( 1 8 ▁days ▁between ▁introduction ▁and ▁Royal ▁Ass ent ), ▁the ▁Home ▁Secretary ▁Charles ▁Clar ke ▁had ▁agreed ▁to ▁table ▁legisl ation ▁in ▁Spring ▁ 2 0 0 6 ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁allow ▁Parliament ▁to ▁consider ▁am end ments ▁to ▁the ▁Act ▁following ▁the ▁first ▁report ▁of ▁the ▁Independent ▁Rev iewer , ▁The ▁Lord ▁Carl ile ▁of ▁Ber r iew , ▁Q C . ▁ ▁Lord ▁Carl ile ▁reported ▁on ▁ 2 ▁February ▁but ▁the ▁Home ▁Secretary ▁announced ▁that ▁he ▁would ▁not ▁be ▁introdu cing ▁fresh ▁legisl ation , ▁given ▁that ▁the ▁T error ism ▁Bill ▁was ▁already ▁under ▁consideration . ▁Instead , ▁the ▁government ▁indicated ▁that ▁it ▁would ▁allow ▁am end ment ▁to ▁the ▁Act ▁in ▁cons olid ating ▁counter - ter ror ism ▁legisl ation ▁scheduled ▁for ▁ 2 0 0 7 . ▁ ▁In ▁any ▁event , ▁sections ▁ 1 – 9 ▁of ▁the ▁Act ▁were ▁subject ▁to ▁annual ▁renew al ▁by ▁aff irm ative ▁resolution ▁of ▁both ▁H ouses ▁of ▁Parliament . ▁Those ▁prov isions ▁were ▁renew ed ▁in ▁ 2 0