▁in ▁the ▁target ▁language . ▁On ▁the ▁other ▁hand , ▁formal ▁equivalence ▁can ▁allow ▁readers ▁familiar ▁with ▁the ▁source ▁language ▁to ▁analyze ▁how ▁meaning ▁was ▁expressed ▁in ▁the ▁original ▁text , ▁pres erving ▁un trans l ated ▁id i oms , ▁r het or ical ▁devices ▁( such ▁as ▁chi astic ▁structures ▁in ▁the ▁Heb rew ▁Bible ) ▁and ▁diction ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁preserve ▁original ▁information ▁and ▁highlight ▁fin er ▁sh ades ▁of ▁meaning . ▁ ▁Bible ▁translation ▁ ▁Trans l ators ▁of ▁the ▁Bible ▁have ▁taken ▁various ▁approaches ▁in ▁rendering ▁it ▁into ▁English , ▁r anging ▁from ▁an ▁extreme ▁use ▁of ▁formal ▁equivalence , ▁to ▁extreme ▁use ▁of ▁dynamic ▁equivalence . ▁▁ ▁Pred omin ant ▁use ▁of ▁formal ▁equivalence ▁ ▁Dou ay - R heim s ▁Bible ▁( 1 6 1 0 ) ▁King ▁James ▁Bible ▁( 1 6 1 1 ) ▁Young ' s ▁Liter al ▁Trans lation ▁( 1 8 6 2 ) ▁Re vised ▁Version ▁( 1 8 8 5 ) ▁American ▁Standard ▁Version ▁( 1 9 0 1 ) ▁Con cord ant ▁Version ▁( 1 9 2 6 ) ▁Re vised ▁Standard ▁Version ▁( 1 9 5 2 ) ▁Re vised ▁Standard ▁Version ▁Catholic ▁Edition ▁( 1 9 6 6 ) ▁New ▁American ▁Standard ▁Bible ▁( 1 9 7 1 ) ▁New ▁King ▁James ▁Version ▁( 1 9 8 2 ) ▁Green ' s ▁Liter al ▁Trans lation ▁( 1 9 8 5 ) ▁New ▁Jewish ▁Public ation ▁Society ▁Tan akh ▁( 1 9 8 5 ) ▁New