iae ▁brief , ▁claim ing ▁that ▁the ▁" M ov ants ▁attempt ▁to ▁paint ▁a ▁false ▁picture ▁of ▁Pla int iffs ▁and ▁the ▁recording ▁industry ▁run ▁am ok ". ▁On ▁February ▁ 6 , ▁ 2 0 0 7 , ▁the ▁att orney ' s ▁fee ▁motion ▁was ▁granted . ▁On ▁July ▁ 1 6 , ▁ 2 0 0 7 , ▁the ▁Court ▁ordered ▁the ▁R I AA ▁to ▁pay ▁M s . ▁F oster ▁$ 6 8 , 6 8 5 . 2 3 ▁in ▁att or ne ys ▁fe es . ▁ ▁In ▁an ▁Oklahoma ▁case , ▁Capit ol ▁Records ▁v . ▁Deb or ah ▁F oster , ▁the ▁R I AA ▁was ▁forced ▁to ▁dismiss ▁a ▁case ▁after ▁a ▁woman ▁file d ▁a ▁motion ▁for ▁leave ▁to ▁make ▁a ▁motion ▁for ▁summary ▁judgment ▁and ▁att or ne ys ▁fe es , ▁stating ▁that ▁she ▁had ▁nothing ▁to ▁do ▁with ▁file ▁sharing ▁and ▁that ▁her ▁only ▁ne x us ▁to ▁the ▁case ▁was ▁that ▁she ▁had ▁paid ▁for ▁internet ▁access . ▁The ▁judge ▁ruled ▁that ▁the ▁R I AA ' s ▁withdraw al ▁of ▁the ▁case — after ▁one ▁and ▁a ▁half ▁years ▁of ▁lit ig ation — did ▁not ▁imm un ize ▁it ▁from ▁possible ▁li ability ▁for ▁att or ne ys ▁fe es , ▁holding ▁that ▁the ▁def endant ▁was ▁a ▁" prev ail ing ▁party " ▁under ▁the ▁Copy right ▁Act . ▁The ▁Court ▁subsequently ▁ruled ▁that ▁def endant ▁was ▁entitled ▁to ▁be ▁re imb urs ed