▁feet . ▁Anyway , ▁Wilson ▁brought ▁the ▁country ▁into ▁World ▁War ▁I . ▁Therefore , ▁Progress ives ▁love ▁war . ▁ ▁Gordon ' s ▁review ▁discovered ▁numerous ▁historical ▁errors ▁that ▁other ▁negative ▁reviews ▁failed ▁to ▁mention . ▁He ▁fault s ▁Gold berg ' s ▁claim ▁that ▁R ous seau ▁is ▁a ▁prec ursor ▁to ▁fasc ism ▁and ▁his ▁interpretation ▁of ▁various ▁phil os opher ' s ▁statements . ▁ ▁In ▁January ▁ 2 0 1 0 , ▁History ▁News ▁Network ▁published ▁ess ays ▁by ▁David ▁Ne i wert , ▁Robert ▁Pa xt on , ▁Roger ▁Griff in , ▁Matthew ▁Feld man , ▁Ch ip ▁Ber let , ▁and ▁Michael ▁L ede en ▁critic izing ▁Liberal ▁F asc ism . ▁They ▁also ▁published ▁Gold berg ' s ▁response ▁which ▁several ▁authors ▁respond ed ▁to . ▁ ▁M ixed ▁reviews ▁Richard ▁Bern stein ▁of ▁The ▁New ▁York ▁Times ▁ ▁wrote , ▁ ▁In ▁the ▁end , ▁Gold berg ' s ▁point ▁that ▁the ▁fasc ist ▁label ▁has ▁been ▁used ▁by ▁some ▁liber als ▁to ▁def ame ▁almost ▁anything ▁they ▁don ' t ▁like ▁is ▁a ▁valid ▁one . ▁So ▁is ▁his ▁cont ention ▁that ▁American ▁conserv at ism ▁has ▁no ▁connection ▁or ▁similarity ▁to ▁European ▁fasc ism — even ▁if ▁some ▁American ▁conserv atives ▁were ▁not ▁especially ▁al ar med ▁by ▁Hitler ian ▁rac ism ▁or , ▁for ▁that ▁matter , ▁American ▁Jim ▁Crow . ▁But ▁he ▁should ▁have ▁stopped ▁there . ▁To ▁go ▁on ▁to ▁label ▁American ▁liber als ▁" nice ▁fasc ists "