▁works ." ▁Justice ▁Otto ▁Moore ▁of ▁the ▁Colorado ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁op ined ▁in ▁ 1 9 5 6 , ▁" Do ▁we ▁hear ▁compla ints ▁that ▁the ▁employ ment ▁of ▁these ▁modern ▁devices ▁of ▁thought ▁transmission ▁in ▁the ▁pul p its ▁of ▁our ▁great ▁churches ▁dest ro ys ▁the ▁dign ity ▁of ▁the ▁service ; ▁that ▁they ▁deg rade ▁the ▁pul pit ▁or ▁create ▁mis con ception s ▁in ▁the ▁mind ▁of ▁the ▁public ? ▁The ▁answers ▁are ▁obvious . ▁That ▁which ▁is ▁carried ▁out ▁with ▁dign ity ▁will ▁not ▁become ▁und ign ified ▁because ▁more ▁people ▁may ▁be ▁permitted ▁to ▁see ▁and ▁hear ." ▁William ▁O . ▁Douglas ▁argued ▁that ▁televis ing ▁tri als ▁should ▁not ▁be ▁allowed ▁because ▁the ▁press ▁can ▁use ▁it ▁to ▁pressure ▁jud ges ▁to ▁decide ▁a ▁case ▁a ▁certain ▁way , ▁particularly ▁in ▁juris dict ions ▁where ▁jud ges ▁are ▁elected . ▁ ▁In ▁reference ▁to ▁the ▁argument ▁that ▁cam eras ▁make ▁witness es ▁nerv ous , ▁former ▁jur ist ▁Louis ▁G oh m ert ▁stated , ▁" I ▁think ▁nerv ous ness ▁is ▁a ▁good ▁thing ▁in ▁a ▁witness . ▁It ▁makes ▁potential ▁in acc ura cies ▁come ▁to ▁the ▁light ▁and ▁easier ▁to ▁observe ." ▁He ▁respond ed ▁to ▁the ▁argument ▁that ▁cam eras ▁may ▁make ▁witness es ▁more ▁rel uct ant ▁to ▁test ify ▁by ▁saying , ▁" There ▁is ▁a ▁thing ▁called ▁a ▁sub po ena ," ▁and ▁not ing ▁that ▁he ▁" found ▁that ▁if ▁people ▁are ▁not ▁willing ▁to ▁come ▁to