▁in ▁Canada ." ▁ ▁Jud icial ▁preced ent ▁The ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁of ▁Canada ▁declared ▁un anim ously ▁in ▁the ▁ 1 9 8 1 ▁Patri ation ▁Reference ▁that ▁the ▁Bill ▁of ▁Rights ▁ 1 6 8 9 , ▁a ▁law ▁requiring ▁am end ment ▁to ▁implement ▁the ▁desired ▁changes ▁to ▁royal ▁succession , ▁is ▁" und ou bt edly ▁in ▁force ▁as ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁law ▁of ▁Canada ". ▁Furthermore , ▁in ▁O ' Don oh ue ▁v . ▁Canada ▁( 2 0 0 3 ) ▁the ▁Ontario ▁Super ior ▁Court ▁of ▁Justice ▁found ▁that ▁the ▁Act ▁of ▁S ett lement ▁ 1 7 0 1 ▁is ▁" part ▁of ▁the ▁laws ▁of ▁Canada " ▁and ▁the ▁rules ▁of ▁succession ▁are ▁" by ▁necessity ▁incorpor ated ▁into ▁the ▁Constitution ▁of ▁Canada ". ▁Another ▁r uling ▁of ▁the ▁Ontario ▁Super ior ▁Court , ▁in ▁ 2 0 1 4 , ▁echo ed ▁the ▁ 2 0 0 3 ▁case , ▁stating ▁that ▁the ▁Act ▁of ▁S ett lement ▁" is ▁an ▁imperial ▁stat ute ▁which ▁ultimately ▁became ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁law ▁of ▁Canada ." ▁Upon ▁dismiss ing ▁appeal ▁of ▁that ▁case , ▁the ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al ▁of ▁Ontario ▁stated ▁"[ t ] he ▁rules ▁of ▁succession ▁are ▁a ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁fabric ▁of ▁the ▁constitution ▁of ▁Canada ▁and ▁incorpor ated ▁into ▁it ". ▁ ▁Under ▁section ▁ 4 1 ▁of ▁the ▁Constitution ▁Act ▁ 1 9 8 2 , ▁changes ▁to ▁the ▁office ▁of ▁the ▁monarch ▁require ▁un anim ous ▁consent ▁of