op les ▁speaking ▁in ▁Fin no - U gr ic ▁languages ▁as ▁well . ▁[ 2 0 ] ▁K ás ler ▁has ▁never ▁bother ed ▁to ▁explain ▁why ▁the ▁ha plot ype ▁of ▁the ▁long - ext inct ▁royal ▁dynast y ▁is ▁relevant ▁to ▁the ▁gen etic ▁history ▁of ▁a ▁nation , ▁let ▁alone ▁the ▁language ▁they ▁speak . ▁This ▁is ▁the ▁most ▁common ▁ha p lo group ▁in ▁different ▁populations ▁that ▁speak ▁S lav ic , ▁Ind o - I ran ian , ▁D rav id ian , ▁Turkish , ▁and ▁Fin no - U gr ic ▁languages . ▁Tr ouble ▁is , ▁gen etic ▁ha p lo group ▁membership ▁is ▁completely ▁irrelevant ▁from ▁the ▁perspective ▁of ▁questions ▁of ▁culture , ▁including ▁language . ▁K ás ler ▁is ▁interested ▁in ▁all ▁this ▁because ▁he ▁maintain s ▁an ▁ult ra con serv ative ▁position ▁concerning ▁the ▁orig ins ▁of ▁Magyar , ▁one ▁of ▁the ▁official ▁languages ▁of ▁current ▁Hung ary . ▁The ▁extreme ▁right ▁tries ▁to ▁find ▁ways ▁to ▁" dis p ove " ▁the ▁categor ization ▁of ▁Magyar ▁as ▁a ▁Fin no - U gr ic ▁language . ▁Since ▁he ▁( or ▁any ▁of ▁the ▁other ▁" anti - Fin no - U gr ists ") ▁have ▁no ▁compet ence ▁in ▁lingu istic ▁history , ▁this ▁mixing ▁of ▁gen etic ▁evidence ▁regarding ▁an ▁ext inct ▁royal ▁dynast y ▁with ▁the ▁question ▁of ▁where ▁the ▁country ' s ▁main ▁language ▁belongs ▁in ▁the ▁history ▁of ▁languages , ▁clearly , ▁mud d ies ▁the