▁blue , ▁emer ge ▁in ▁the ▁cre ative ▁process . ▁▁ ▁Another ▁difference ▁between ▁White head ▁and ▁Hart sh or ne ▁is ▁that ▁the ▁English man ▁usually ▁spoke ▁of ▁God ▁as ▁a ▁single ▁actual ▁entity ▁whereas ▁Hart sh or ne ▁thought ▁it ▁better ▁to ▁think ▁of ▁God ▁as ▁a ▁personally ▁ordered ▁series ▁of ▁actual ▁entities , ▁each ▁exhib iting ▁the ▁abstract ▁character ▁of ▁div inity , ▁as ▁necessarily ▁supre me ▁in ▁love , ▁knowledge ▁and ▁power . ▁In ▁Hart sh or ne ' s ▁process ▁the ology ▁God ▁and ▁the ▁world ▁exist ▁in ▁a ▁dynamic , ▁changing ▁relationship . ▁God ▁is ▁a ▁' di - pol ar ' ▁de ity . ▁By ▁this ▁Hart sh or ne ▁meant ▁that ▁God ▁has ▁both ▁abstract ▁and ▁concrete ▁pol es . ▁The ▁abstract ▁pole ▁refers ▁to ▁those ▁elements ▁within ▁God ▁that ▁never ▁vary , ▁such ▁as ▁God ' s ▁self - identity , ▁while ▁the ▁concrete ▁pole ▁refers ▁to ▁the ▁organ ic ▁growth ▁in ▁God ' s ▁perfect ▁knowledge ▁of ▁the ▁world ▁as ▁the ▁world ▁itself ▁develop s ▁and ▁changes . ▁Hart sh or ne ▁did ▁not ▁accept ▁the ▁classical ▁the istic ▁claim ▁of ▁cre atio ▁ex ▁n ih ilo ▁( cre ation ▁out ▁of ▁nothing ), ▁and ▁instead ▁held ▁to ▁cre atio ▁ex ▁mater ia ▁( cre ation ▁out ▁of ▁pre - ex istent ▁material ), ▁although ▁this ▁is ▁not ▁an ▁expression ▁he ▁used . ▁ ▁One ▁of ▁the ▁technical ▁terms ▁Hart sh or ne ▁used ▁is ▁pan - en - the ism , ▁originally