0 7 ▁following ▁votes ▁of ▁the ▁Commons ▁( 2 2 ▁February ▁ 2 0 0 7 ) ▁and ▁the ▁L ords ▁( 5 ▁March ▁ 2 0 0 7 ). ▁The ▁prov isions ▁were ▁again ▁renew ed ▁on ▁ 1 1 ▁March ▁ 2 0 0 9 . ▁ ▁In compat ibility ▁with ▁human ▁rights ▁▁ ▁In ▁April ▁ 2 0 0 6 , ▁in ▁his ▁judgment ▁in ▁the ▁case ▁of ▁Re ▁MB , ▁Mr ▁Justice ▁S ull ivan ▁issued ▁a ▁declaration ▁under ▁section ▁ 4 ▁of ▁the ▁Human ▁Rights ▁Act ▁ 1 9 9 8 ▁that ▁section ▁ 3 ▁of ▁the ▁Pre vention ▁of ▁T error ism ▁Act ▁ 2 0 0 5 ▁was ▁in compatible ▁with ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁fair ▁proceed ings ▁under ▁article ▁ 6 ▁of ▁the ▁European ▁Convention ▁on ▁Human ▁Rights . ▁Mr ▁Justice ▁S ull ivan ▁held : ▁ ▁However , ▁on ▁ 1 ▁August ▁ 2 0 0 6 , ▁the ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al ▁revers ed ▁this ▁jud g ement ▁( in ▁part ). ▁They ▁agreed ▁that ▁MB ' s ▁Article   5 ▁rights ▁had ▁been ▁bre ached , ▁but ▁said ▁that ▁it ▁did ▁not ▁in fr inge ▁on ▁his ▁Article   6 ▁rights . ▁ ▁On ▁the ▁point ▁of ▁particular ▁Convention ▁rights ▁being ▁bre ached , ▁the ▁court ▁made ▁a ▁particular ▁distinction . ▁Following ▁Secretary ▁of ▁State ▁for ▁the ▁Home ▁Department ▁v ▁J J ▁the ▁House ▁of ▁L ords ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁restrictions ▁im posed ▁within ▁the ▁control ▁would ▁be ▁open ▁to ▁challenge ▁on