▁lead ▁V P ▁to ▁the ▁win . ▁shr oud ▁was ▁close ▁with ▁ 1 9 ▁k ills , ▁but ▁other ▁players ▁like ▁se ang @ res ▁who ▁only ▁had ▁ 5 ▁k ills ▁did ▁not ▁show ▁up . ▁V P ▁went ▁on ▁to ▁the ▁play offs ▁and ▁became ▁Leg ends ▁once ▁again . ▁ ▁Group ▁Stage ▁ 2 ▁ ▁Group ▁E ▁ ▁C ounter ▁Log ic ▁G aming ▁vs . ▁Team ▁e B ett le ▁C aster s : ▁Joe ▁Miller ▁& ▁Henry G ▁ ▁The ▁second ▁best ▁teams ▁from ▁the ▁teams ' ▁respective ▁regions ▁faced ▁off . ▁CL G ▁from ▁the ▁United ▁States ▁lost ▁a ▁close ▁game ▁to ▁the ▁Nin jas ▁in ▁Py j am as ▁in ▁the ▁first ▁match ▁of ▁the ▁maj ors . ▁Meanwhile , ▁e B ett le ▁from ▁Poland ▁was ▁st om ped ▁on ▁by ▁F n atic ▁back ▁in ▁Group ▁C . ▁In ▁this ▁game , ▁e B ett le ▁did ▁not ▁show ▁the ▁hard ships ▁it ▁had ▁shown ▁against ▁F n atic . ▁CL G ▁took ▁the ▁p istol ▁round ▁after ▁j dm 6 4 ▁had ▁a ▁nin ja ▁def use , ▁meaning ▁that ▁the ▁CL G ▁player ▁was ▁def using ▁the ▁bomb ▁and ▁none ▁of ▁the ▁e B ett le ▁players ▁knew ▁that ▁he ▁was ▁def using . ▁CL G ▁eventually ▁took ▁a ▁ 1 0 - 5 ▁lead ▁at ▁the ▁half . ▁However , ▁e B ett le ▁proved ▁that ▁its ▁counter - ter ror ist ▁half ▁could ▁go ▁head - to - head