▁should ▁receive ▁equal ▁pay ▁for ▁equal ▁work . ▁In ▁the ▁Equ al ▁Rem un er ation ▁Act ▁ 1 9 7 6 ▁implemented ▁this ▁principle ▁in ▁legisl ation . ▁ ▁Rand h ir ▁Singh ▁v ▁Union ▁of ▁India ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁of ▁India ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁principle ▁of ▁equal ▁pay ▁for ▁equal ▁work ▁is ▁a ▁constitution al ▁goal ▁and ▁therefore ▁capable ▁of ▁enfor cement ▁through ▁constitution al ▁rem ed ies ▁under ▁Article ▁ 3 2 ▁of ▁Constitution ▁State ▁of ▁AP ▁v ▁G ▁S reen iv asa ▁R ao , ▁equal ▁pay ▁for ▁equal ▁work ▁does ▁not ▁mean ▁that ▁all ▁the ▁members ▁of ▁the ▁same ▁cadre ▁must ▁receive ▁the ▁same ▁pay ▁packet ▁ir res pective ▁of ▁their ▁senior ity , ▁source ▁of ▁rec ruit ment , ▁educational ▁qual ifications ▁and ▁various ▁other ▁inc idents ▁of ▁service . ▁ ▁State ▁of ▁MP ▁v ▁Pr am od ▁Bar ati ya , ▁compar isons ▁should ▁focus ▁on ▁similarity ▁of ▁skill , ▁effort ▁and ▁responsibility ▁when ▁performed ▁under ▁similar ▁conditions ▁ ▁Mack inn on ▁Mack en zie ▁& ▁Co ▁v ▁Ad ure y ▁D ' C osta , ▁a ▁broad ▁approach ▁is ▁to ▁be ▁taken ▁to ▁decide ▁whether ▁duties ▁to ▁be ▁performed ▁are ▁similar ▁ ▁M igr ant ▁workers ▁Inter state ▁M igr ant ▁Work men ▁Act ▁ 1 9 7 9 ▁ ▁V ul ner able ▁groups ▁Bond ed ▁Labour ▁System ▁( A bol ition ) ▁Act ▁ 1 9 7 6 , ▁abol ishes ▁bond ed ▁labour , ▁but ▁estimates ▁suggest ▁that ▁between ▁ 2 ▁million ▁and