und est rup ▁ca uld ron , ▁although ▁he ▁appears ▁to ▁have ▁over look ed ▁that ▁the ▁ca uld ron ▁also ▁shows ▁a ▁figure ▁holding ▁a ▁s nake . ▁ ▁Arr hen ius ▁and ▁Hol m qu ist ▁( 1 9 6 0 ) ▁also ▁found ▁a ▁connection ▁with ▁late ▁C elt ic ▁art ▁suggesting ▁that ▁the ▁stone ▁dep icted ▁Daniel ▁in ▁the ▁l ions ' ▁den ▁and ▁compared ▁it ▁with ▁a ▁dep iction ▁on ▁a ▁pur se ▁lid ▁from ▁S utton ▁H oo , ▁although ▁the ▁stone ▁in ▁question ▁does ▁not ▁show ▁cre atures ▁with ▁legs . ▁Ar wid sson ▁( 1 9 6 3 ) ▁also ▁attributed ▁the ▁stone ▁to ▁late ▁C elt ic ▁art ▁and ▁compared ▁it ▁with ▁the ▁figure ▁holding ▁a ▁s nake ▁on ▁the ▁G und est rup ▁ca uld ron . ▁In ▁a ▁later ▁publication ▁Arr hen ius ▁( 1 9 9 4 ) ▁considered ▁the ▁figure ▁not ▁to ▁be ▁a ▁w itch ▁but ▁a ▁mag ician ▁and ▁she ▁dated ▁it ▁to ▁the ▁V end el ▁Period , ▁ ▁although ▁men ▁are ▁called ▁w itch es ▁also , ▁and ▁the ▁legs ▁spread ▁clearly ▁ident ifies ▁this ▁as ▁a ▁female , ▁making ▁her ▁a ▁w itch ▁who ▁was ▁a ▁mag ician . ▁H au k ▁( 1 9 8 3 ), ▁who ▁is ▁a ▁special ist ▁on ▁b ract e ates , ▁suggested ▁that ▁the ▁stone ▁dep ict s ▁Od in ▁in ▁the ▁fetch ▁of ▁a ▁woman , ▁while ▁G ör man ▁( 1 9 8 3 )