▁T isch endorf ' s ▁view ▁was ▁accepted ▁by ▁Freder ic ▁G . ▁Ken y on , ▁but ▁cont ested ▁by ▁T . ▁C . ▁S ke at , ▁who ▁exam ined ▁the ▁code x ▁more ▁thoroughly . ▁S ke at ▁and ▁other ▁pale ograph ers ▁cont ested ▁T isch endorf ' s ▁theory ▁of ▁a ▁third ▁( C ) ▁scri be , ▁instead ▁as ser ting ▁that ▁two ▁scri bes ▁worked ▁on ▁the ▁Old ▁Testament ▁( A ▁and ▁B ) ▁and ▁one ▁of ▁them ▁( B ) ▁wrote ▁the ▁New ▁Testament . ▁S cribe ▁A ▁wrote : ▁ ▁Gen esis ▁– ▁ 1 ▁Kings ▁( pages ▁ 4 1 – 3 3 4 ) ▁ ▁Ps al ms ▁– ▁Tob ias ▁( pages ▁ 6 2 5 – 9 4 4 ) ▁S cribe ▁B ▁wrote : ▁▁ 1 ▁Kings ▁– ▁ 2 ▁Es dra ▁( pages ▁ 3 3 5 – 6 2 4 ) ▁ ▁H ose a ▁– ▁Daniel ▁( pages ▁ 9 4 5 – 1 2 3 4 ) ▁ ▁New ▁Testament . ▁ ▁Two ▁correct ors ▁worked ▁on ▁the ▁manuscript , ▁one ▁( B 2 ) ▁contemporary ▁with ▁the ▁scri bes , ▁the ▁other ▁( B 3 ) ▁in ▁about ▁the ▁ 1 0 th ▁or ▁ 1 1 th ▁century , ▁although ▁the ▁theory ▁of ▁a ▁first ▁correct or , ▁B 1 , ▁proposed ▁by ▁T isch endorf ▁was ▁rejected ▁by ▁later ▁sch ol ars . ▁According ▁to ▁T isch endorf , ▁one ▁of ▁the