▁a ▁married ▁executive ▁at ▁Cond é ▁N ast , ▁over ▁a ▁gay ▁por n ▁star ’ s ▁alleg ed ▁text ▁correspond ence . ▁The ▁post ▁spark ed ▁heavy ▁criticism ▁for ▁out ing ▁the ▁executive , ▁both ▁internally ▁and ▁from ▁out s iders . ▁D ent on ▁removed ▁the ▁story ▁the ▁next ▁day , ▁after ▁G aw ker ▁Media ' s ▁man aging ▁partners hip ▁voted ▁ 4 - 2 ▁to ▁remove ▁the ▁post — mark ing ▁the ▁first ▁time ▁the ▁website ▁had ▁" rem oved ▁a ▁significant ▁news ▁story ▁for ▁any ▁reason ▁other ▁than ▁fact ual ▁error ▁or ▁legal ▁settlement ." ▁ ▁G aw ker ' s ▁Executive ▁Editor ▁and ▁Editor - in - Ch ief ▁res igned ▁after ▁the ▁story ▁was ▁dropped ▁from ▁G aw ker ' s ▁website . ▁ ▁According ▁to ▁The ▁Daily ▁Be ast , ▁" a ▁source ▁familiar ▁with ▁the ▁situation ▁said ▁G aw ker ▁ultimately ▁paid ▁the ▁subject ▁of ▁the ▁off ending ▁article ▁a ▁tid y ▁und is closed ▁sum ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁avoid ▁another ▁law suit ." ▁ ▁Daily ▁Mail ▁def am ation ▁law suit ▁In ▁September ▁ 2 0 1 5 , ▁G aw ker ▁published ▁a ▁first - person ▁narr ative ▁by ▁a ▁former ▁employee ▁of ▁British ▁tab lo id ▁The ▁Daily ▁Mail ▁which ▁was ▁critical ▁of ▁the ▁journal istic ▁standards ▁and ▁aggreg ation ▁policies ▁for ▁its ▁online ▁presence . ▁ ▁Daily ▁Mail ▁su ed ▁for ▁def am ation , ▁stating ▁the ▁article ▁contained ▁" bl at ant , ▁def am atory ▁false hood