, ▁the ▁wid ow ▁and ▁sole ▁he ir ▁of ▁the ▁rights ▁of ▁writer ▁Jorge ▁Luis ▁Borg es , ▁for ▁the ▁alleg ed ▁the ft ▁of ▁intellectual ▁property . ▁The ▁r uling ▁established ▁that ▁internet ▁companies ▁cannot ▁be ▁held ▁li able ▁a ▁pri ori ▁for ▁content ▁shared ▁by ▁users ▁across ▁platforms ▁and ▁that ▁there ▁was ▁no ▁mal icious ▁intent ions ▁on ▁the ▁part ▁of ▁T aring a ! ▁ ▁Through out ▁April ▁ 2 0 1 4 , ▁K od ama ▁reported ▁various ▁websites ▁which ▁alleg edly ▁facil itated ▁or ▁reprodu ced ▁una ut hor ized ▁texts ▁by ▁Jorge ▁Luis ▁Borg es ▁on ▁the ▁internet . ▁Finally , ▁the ▁justice ▁made ▁its ▁settlement ▁in ▁line ▁with ▁the ▁juris pr ud ence ▁of ▁recent ▁cases ▁in ▁Argentina ▁– ▁p . e ▁" Bel én ▁Rod rig uez ▁and ▁Google " ▁– ▁making ▁the ▁responsibility ▁of ▁internet ▁inter medi aries ▁a ▁subject ive ▁one . ▁ ▁According ▁to ▁this ▁position , ▁internet ▁inter medi ary ▁companies ▁can ▁only ▁be ▁considered ▁account able ▁for ▁any ▁illegal ▁content ▁uploaded ▁by ▁users ▁through ▁their ▁platforms ▁once ▁they ▁are ▁d uly ▁not ified ▁by ▁the ▁affected ▁owner ▁of ▁a ▁bre ach ▁of ▁law , ▁and ▁only ▁if , ▁once ▁not ified ▁they ▁do ▁not ▁proceed ▁quickly ▁and ▁dil ig ently ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁remove ▁the ▁content ▁and ▁stop ▁in fr ing ement . ▁ ▁Social ▁impact ▁In ▁ 2 0 1 0 , ▁an ▁Argent ine ▁user ▁of ▁the ▁site ▁built ▁a ▁bass ▁guitar ▁that ▁he ▁could ▁gift ▁to ▁Paul