▁derived ▁from ▁the ▁concept ▁of ▁an ▁open ▁and ▁dem ocr atic ▁society , ▁based ▁on ▁freedom ▁and ▁equality , ▁were ▁to ▁suff use ▁whole ▁process , ▁such ▁values ▁being ▁norm ative ▁in ▁the ▁employ ment ▁of ▁such ▁a ▁process . ▁The ▁court ▁would ▁frequently ▁be ▁required ▁to ▁make ▁difficult ▁value ▁jud g ments ▁where ▁logic ▁and ▁preced ent ▁were ▁of ▁limited ▁assistance . ▁ ▁In ▁interpre ting ▁the ▁Constitution , ▁the ▁court ▁would ▁have ▁to ▁consider ▁the ▁area ▁of ▁compar ative ▁law . ▁Section ▁ 3 5 ▁of ▁the ▁Constitution ▁was ▁to ▁be ▁understood ▁as ▁requiring ▁the ▁court ▁to ▁give ▁due ▁attention ▁to ▁international ▁experience , ▁with ▁a ▁view ▁to ▁finding ▁principles ▁rather ▁than ▁rig id ▁formula e , ▁and ▁to ▁look ▁for ▁rational es ▁rather ▁than ▁rules . ▁ ▁Jud gment ▁ ▁The ▁court ▁found ▁that ▁the ▁following ▁prov isions ▁of ▁the ▁Mag istr ates ' ▁Cour ts ▁Act ▁were ▁incons istent ▁with ▁the ▁Constitution ▁and ▁declared ▁them ▁invalid , ▁with ▁effect ▁from ▁the ▁date ▁of ▁the ▁order , ▁September ▁ 2 2 , ▁ 1 9 9 5 : ▁▁ ▁the ▁words ▁" why ▁he ▁should ▁not ▁be ▁committed ▁for ▁cont empt ▁of ▁court ▁and " ▁in ▁section ▁ 6 5 A ( 1 ) ▁of ▁the ▁Act ; ▁ ▁sections ▁ 6 5 F , ▁ 6 5 G ▁and ▁ 6 5 H ; ▁ ▁paragraph s ▁( a ) ▁and ▁( b ) ▁of ▁section ▁ 6 5 J ( 1 ); ▁ ▁paragraph ▁( b )( ii