s ▁motion ▁for ▁pre lim inary ▁inj unction ▁for ▁the ▁reasons ▁mainly ▁because ▁P T AT ▁and ▁Auto H op ▁did ▁not ▁in fr inge ▁copy right s ▁and ▁did ▁not ▁bre ach ▁the ▁contract ; ▁and ▁while ▁Q A ▁copies ▁constit uted ▁a ▁copy right ▁in fr ing ement ▁and ▁bre ached ▁the ▁contract , ▁the ▁harm ▁from ▁the ▁copies ▁was ▁not ▁irre par able , ▁but ▁was ▁compens able ▁with ▁money . ▁Fox ▁appe aled ▁to ▁the ▁United ▁States ▁Court ▁of ▁App e als ▁for ▁the ▁N inth ▁Circ uit . ▁On ▁July ▁ 2 4 , ▁ 2 0 1 3 , ▁the ▁N inth ▁Circ uit ▁review ed ▁the ▁district ▁court ' s ▁decision ▁with ▁a ▁very ▁de fer ential ▁standard ▁of ▁review , ▁and ▁aff ir med ▁it . ▁ ▁In ▁March ▁ 2 0 1 4 , ▁Disney ▁dropped ▁its ▁law suit ▁against ▁D ish ▁Network ▁with ▁the ▁signing ▁of ▁a ▁compreh ensive ▁carriage ▁deal ▁for ▁its ▁networks ▁( al ong ▁with ▁several ▁new ▁networks , ▁such ▁as ▁Disney ▁Junior , ▁Long horn ▁Network , ▁and ▁SE C ▁Network ), ▁including ▁high ▁definition ▁fe eds ▁and ▁TV ▁Every where ▁access ▁for ▁the ▁networks ▁and ▁ABC ▁owned - and - oper ated ▁stations , ▁and ▁the ▁ability ▁to ▁dist ribute ▁their ▁networks ▁on ▁a ▁planned ▁over - the - top ▁internet ▁television ▁service . ▁As ▁a ▁condition ▁of ▁the ▁new ▁deal , ▁D ish ▁Network ▁agreed ▁to ▁disable ▁the ▁ability ▁to ▁use ▁Auto H op ▁on ▁ABC ▁programming