▁har ass ed ▁by ▁anti - ab ort ion ▁activ ists . ▁ ▁P . ▁and ▁S . ▁then ▁went ▁to ▁a ▁hospital ▁in ▁Wars aw . ▁Do ctors ▁there ▁expressed ▁rel uct ance ▁to ▁perform ▁the ▁procedure , ▁stating ▁that ▁they ▁were ▁under ▁pressure ▁not ▁to ▁do ▁so . ▁P . ▁and ▁S . ▁were ▁then ▁taken ▁in ▁for ▁police ▁question ing , ▁and ▁S . ▁accused ▁of ▁attempting ▁to ▁force ▁P . ▁to ▁have ▁an ▁abort ion . ▁P . ▁was ▁then ▁placed ▁in ▁a ▁ju ven ile ▁shelter , ▁and ▁authorities ▁began ▁proceed ings ▁to ▁take ▁cust ody ▁of ▁the ▁girl ▁away ▁from ▁S . ▁After ▁a ▁compla int ▁by ▁S . ▁to ▁the ▁Ministry ▁of ▁Health , ▁P . ▁was ▁allowed ▁to ▁have ▁an ▁abort ion ▁in ▁G da ń sk . ▁ ▁The ▁European ▁Court ▁of ▁Human ▁Rights ▁ruled ▁that ▁Poland ▁had ▁viol ated ▁Article ▁ 3 ▁of ▁the ▁European ▁Convention ▁on ▁Human ▁Rights , ▁the ▁" pro hib ition ▁of ▁in human ▁or ▁de grad ing ▁treatment ". ▁The ▁court ▁stated ▁that ▁P .' s ▁difficulties ▁increased ▁due ▁to ▁" the ▁lack ▁of ▁a ▁clear ▁legal ▁framework , ▁pro cr ast ination ▁of ▁medical ▁staff ▁and ▁also ▁as ▁result ▁of ▁har ass ment ". ▁The ▁decision ▁went ▁on ▁to ▁note ▁that ▁"[ t ] he ▁court ▁was ▁particularly ▁struck ▁that ▁the ▁authorities ▁started ▁criminal ▁proceed ings ▁for ▁ill ic it ▁sexual ▁relations ▁against ▁the ▁ad oles cent ▁who , ▁according ▁to ▁the ▁pro sec utor ▁and ▁medical