▁where ▁logic ▁and ▁preced ent ▁are ▁of ▁limited ▁assistance . ▁What ▁must ▁be ▁determin ative ▁is ▁the ▁Court ' s ▁judgment , ▁based ▁on ▁an ▁understanding ▁of ▁the ▁values ▁on ▁which ▁South ▁African ▁society ▁is ▁being ▁built , ▁and ▁the ▁interests ▁at ▁st ake ▁in ▁the ▁particular ▁case . ▁This ▁judgment ▁cannot ▁be ▁made ▁in ▁the ▁abstract ; ▁rather ▁than ▁speak ▁of ▁values ▁as ▁Plat onic ▁ide als , ▁the ▁judge ▁must ▁situ ate ▁his ▁analysis ▁in ▁the ▁facts ▁of ▁the ▁particular ▁case , ▁we igh ing ▁the ▁different ▁values ▁represented ▁in ▁that ▁context . ▁ ▁In ▁the ▁present ▁matter , ▁the ▁court ▁was ▁called ▁upon ▁to ▁exercise ▁what ▁Sach s ▁J ▁described ▁as ▁a ▁struct ured ▁and ▁discipl ined ▁value ▁judgment , ▁taking ▁account ▁of ▁all ▁the ▁compet ing ▁consider ations ▁that ▁arose ▁in ▁the ▁circumstances ▁of ▁the ▁case , ▁as ▁to ▁whether ▁or ▁not , ▁in ▁the ▁open ▁and ▁dem ocr atic ▁society ▁based ▁on ▁freedom ▁and ▁equality ▁cont empl ated ▁by ▁the ▁Constitution , ▁it ▁was ▁legit imate ▁or ▁acceptable ▁or ▁appropriate ▁to ▁continue ▁to ▁send ▁default ing ▁judgment ▁deb t ors ▁to ▁ga ol ▁in ▁terms ▁of ▁the ▁procedures ▁set ▁out ▁in ▁sections ▁ 6 5 A ▁to ▁ 6 5 M ▁of ▁the ▁Mag istr ates ' ▁Cour ts ▁Act . ▁ ▁Foreign ▁law ▁ ▁Sach s ▁J ▁noted ▁the ▁inv itation ▁to ▁the ▁court ▁in ▁section ▁ 3 5 ▁of ▁the ▁Constitution ▁to ▁have ▁regard ▁to ▁international ▁experience ▁where ▁applicable ▁when ▁seeking ▁to ▁interpret ▁prov isions ▁rel