ak ▁Mis ra , ▁a ▁first ▁against ▁a ▁sitting ▁Chief ▁Justice ▁of ▁India ▁in ▁history . ▁ 7 1 ▁members ▁had ▁signed ▁the ▁notice . ▁However , ▁ 7 ▁of ▁them ▁ret ied , ▁leaving ▁only ▁ 6 4 . ▁Despite ▁that , ▁its ▁still ▁above ▁the ▁minimum ▁of ▁ 5 0 ▁sign atures ▁required ▁for ▁introdu cing ▁a ▁motion ▁of ▁im pe achment ▁in ▁the ▁Raj ya ▁Sab ha . ▁While ▁the ▁Congress ▁claimed ▁it ▁had ▁to ▁do ▁nothing ▁with ▁the ▁Lo ya ▁ver dict ▁the ▁previous ▁day , ▁Minister ▁of ▁Fin ance ▁Ar un ▁J ait ley ▁term ed ▁it ▁a ▁reven ge ▁pet ition ▁for ▁the ▁Lo ya ▁ver dict . ▁The ▁Congress ▁didn ' t ▁seem ▁un ited , ▁as ▁two ▁former ▁law ▁minister s ▁question ed ▁the ▁motion . ▁Form er ▁Prime ▁Minister ▁Man m oh an ▁Singh ▁and ▁Form er ▁fin ance ▁minister ▁P . ▁Ch id amb aram ▁did ▁not ▁sign ▁the ▁notice . ▁Despite ▁this , ▁the ▁Congress ▁submitted ▁the ▁notice ▁to ▁the ▁Vice ▁President ▁of ▁India ▁Ven ka iah ▁Na id u . ▁ ▁After ▁consult ing ▁legal ▁exper ts , ▁Ven ka iah ▁Na id u ▁rejected ▁the ▁motion , ▁saying ▁that ▁there ▁was ▁no ▁“ subst ant ial ▁and ▁ver ifiable ” ▁evidence ▁of ▁wrong do ing . ▁The ▁Congress , ▁however , ▁said ▁that ▁he ▁acted ▁in ▁has te . ▁The ▁Congress ▁was ▁considering ▁moving ▁to ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁against ▁this . ▁ ▁References ▁▁ ▁Category : 1 9 6 6