▁century ; ▁it ▁was ▁even ▁translated ▁into ▁Dutch ▁as ▁Recht - B an ck ▁tegen ▁de ▁Lu ye , ▁Kor zel ig he , ▁en ▁W isp elt u yr ig he ▁V r ouwen ▁in ▁ 1 6 4 1 ▁( to ▁be ▁repr int ed ▁four ▁times ▁in ▁the ▁ 1 7 th ▁century , ▁with ▁two ▁further ▁ed itions ▁in ▁the ▁early ▁ 1 8 th ). ▁Some ▁sch ol ars ▁propose ▁that ▁this ▁popular ity ▁was ▁due ▁to ▁its ▁heavy ▁drawing ▁from ▁previous ▁works , ▁including ▁and ▁especially ▁John ▁Ly ly ' s ▁Eu ph ues , ▁and ▁its ▁consequ ent ▁sense ▁of ▁inclus iveness . ▁O thers ▁suppose ▁it ▁could ▁have ▁been ▁its ▁decis ively ▁middle - class ▁emphas is ▁and ▁humor . ▁It ▁is ▁also ▁possible ▁that ▁it ▁became ▁popular ▁because ▁of ▁the ▁reaction ▁it ▁spark ed ▁from ▁other ▁writers , ▁which ▁seems ▁to ▁be ▁its ▁most ▁distingu ishing ▁characteristic . ▁ ▁Response ▁ ▁Three ▁female ▁writers ▁respond ed ▁independently ▁to ▁Sw et nam ' s ▁work , ▁in ▁defence ▁of ▁their ▁gender . ▁The ▁first ▁response ▁was ▁by ▁Rach el ▁Sp eg ht , ▁writing ▁under ▁her ▁own ▁name . ▁A ▁Mou z ell ▁for ▁Mel ast om us ▁focus es ▁on ▁bib lic al ▁material , ▁interpre ting ▁script ure ▁to ▁counter ▁Sw et nam ' s ▁attacks , ▁while ▁critic ising ▁its ▁grammar ▁and ▁style . ▁She ▁writes , ▁" Wh oso ▁makes ▁the ▁fruit ▁of ▁his ▁c og itations ▁ext ant ▁to ▁the