▁supplied ▁a ▁trans cript ▁of ▁ 1 ▁John ▁ 4 : 1 – 3 ▁and ▁ 1 ▁John ▁ 5 : 7 – 1 1 ▁to ▁show ▁that ▁it ▁did ▁not . ▁Sep úl ved a ▁in ▁ 1 5 3 3 ▁cross - checked ▁all ▁places ▁where ▁Er as mus ' s ▁New ▁Testament ▁( the ▁Text us ▁Re cept us ) ▁differ ed ▁from ▁the ▁V ul gate , ▁and ▁supplied ▁Er as mus ▁with ▁ 3 6 5 ▁read ings ▁where ▁the ▁Code x ▁V at ican us ▁supported ▁the ▁latter , ▁although ▁the ▁list ▁of ▁these ▁ 3 6 5 ▁read ings ▁has ▁been ▁lost . ▁Con sequently , ▁the ▁Code x ▁V at ican us ▁acquired ▁the ▁reputation ▁of ▁being ▁an ▁old ▁Greek ▁manuscript ▁that ▁agreed ▁with ▁the ▁V ul gate ▁rather ▁than ▁with ▁the ▁Text us ▁Re cept us . ▁Not ▁until ▁much ▁later ▁would ▁sch ol ars ▁real ise ▁it ▁conform ed ▁to ▁a ▁text ▁that ▁differ ed ▁from ▁both ▁the ▁V ul gate ▁and ▁the ▁Text us ▁Re cept us ▁– ▁a ▁text ▁that ▁could ▁also ▁be ▁found ▁in ▁other ▁known ▁early ▁Greek ▁manuscript s , ▁such ▁as ▁the ▁Code x ▁Reg ius ▁( L ), ▁hous ed ▁in ▁the ▁French ▁Royal ▁Library ▁( now ▁Bibliothèque ▁nationale ▁de ▁France ). ▁ ▁In ▁ 1 6 6 9 ▁a ▁coll ation ▁was ▁made ▁by ▁Giul io ▁Bart ol oc ci , ▁li br arian ▁of ▁the ▁V at ican , ▁which ▁was ▁not ▁published , ▁and