agi ot is ▁K av v ad ias ▁of ▁ 1 8 8 5 - 1 8 9 0 . ▁The ▁find ings ▁of ▁this ▁dig ▁allowed ▁Wilhelm ▁D ör pf eld , ▁then ▁director ▁of ▁the ▁German ▁Arch ae ological ▁Institute , ▁to ▁assert ▁that ▁there ▁existed ▁a ▁distinct ▁sub structure ▁to ▁the ▁original ▁Par then on , ▁called ▁Par then on ▁I ▁by ▁D ör pf eld , ▁ ▁not ▁immediately ▁below ▁the ▁present ▁ed ifice ▁as ▁had ▁been ▁previously ▁assumed . ▁D ör pf eld ’ s ▁observation ▁was ▁that ▁the ▁three ▁steps ▁of ▁the ▁first ▁Par then on ▁consist ▁of ▁two ▁steps ▁of ▁por os ▁lim estone , ▁the ▁same ▁as ▁the ▁found ations , ▁and ▁a ▁top ▁step ▁of ▁K arr ha ▁lim estone ▁that ▁was ▁covered ▁by ▁the ▁lowest ▁step ▁of ▁the ▁Per icle an ▁Par then on . ▁This ▁platform ▁was ▁smaller ▁and ▁slightly ▁to ▁the ▁north ▁of ▁the ▁final ▁Par then on , ▁indicating ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁built ▁for ▁a ▁wh olly ▁different ▁building , ▁now ▁wh olly ▁covered ▁over . ▁This ▁picture ▁was ▁somewhat ▁complicated ▁by ▁the ▁publication ▁of ▁the ▁final ▁report ▁on ▁the ▁ 1 8 8 5 – 9 0 ▁exc av ations ▁indicating ▁that ▁the ▁sub structure ▁was ▁contemporary ▁with ▁the ▁Kim onian ▁walls , ▁and ▁imp lying ▁a ▁later ▁date ▁for ▁the ▁first ▁temple . ▁ ▁If ▁the ▁original ▁Par then on ▁was ▁indeed ▁destroyed ▁in ▁ 4 8 0 ▁BC , ▁it ▁inv ites ▁the ▁question ▁of ▁why ▁the