▁that ▁he ▁was ▁" not ▁interested ▁in ▁passing ▁a ▁bill ▁that ▁is ▁water ed ▁down ▁so ▁sever ely ." ▁ ▁The ▁changes ▁also ▁included ▁deleting ▁a ▁large ▁section ▁of ▁definitions , ▁which ▁critics ▁claim ▁could ▁make ▁it ▁more ▁difficult ▁for ▁California ' s ▁att orney ▁general ▁to ▁pro sec ute ▁viol ations ▁of ▁the ▁legisl ation . ▁▁ ▁The ▁am end ments , ▁published ▁less ▁than ▁ 1 2 ▁hours ▁before ▁the ▁hearing , ▁were ▁approved ▁ 8 - 0 [ 6 ] ▁by ▁the ▁Communic ations ▁and ▁Con vey ance ▁committee , ▁which ▁Santiago ▁ch airs , ▁on ▁June ▁ 2 0 , ▁ 2 0 1 8 . ▁That ▁vote ▁occurred ▁before ▁Wiener ▁could ▁argue ▁against ▁them ▁and ▁before ▁any ▁testim ony . ▁After ▁the ▁testim ony , ▁the ▁am ended ▁bill ▁was ▁approved ▁ 8 - 2 . ▁O pp on ents ▁of ▁the ▁am ended ▁version ▁stated ▁that ▁Santiago ' s ▁changes ▁would ▁create ▁loop hol es ▁through ▁which ▁broad band ▁prov iders ▁could ▁charge ▁fe es ▁to ▁content ▁prov iders ▁while ▁ex empt ing ▁their ▁own ▁content ▁from ▁any ▁data ▁caps . ▁Pro ponents ▁of ▁the ▁changes ▁cont end ▁that ▁without ▁them ▁broad band ▁prov iders ▁would ▁not ▁be ▁allowed ▁to ▁offer ▁free ▁mobile ▁data ▁that ▁doesn ' t ▁count ▁against ▁users ' ▁caps , ▁harm ing ▁consum ers , ▁and ▁that ▁net ▁neutral ity ▁in ▁general ▁would ▁disc ou rage ▁prov iders ▁from ▁impro ving ▁their ▁network ▁infrastr ucture . ▁Representatives ▁of ▁major ▁I SP s ▁continue