▁its ▁internal ▁matter ▁to ▁del ist ▁him ▁as ▁well . ▁Nevertheless , ▁when ▁the ▁United ▁States ▁inv aded ▁Ira q , ▁Sh af are v ich ▁f ax ed ▁his ▁res ignation . ▁ ▁Acc us ations ▁of ▁ant is emit ism ▁have ▁continued , ▁involving ▁Sh af are v ich ' s ▁other ▁publications . ▁S emy on ▁Re znik ▁targets ▁the ▁Russ oph ob ia ▁ess ay ▁for ▁alleg ed ▁fact ual ▁in acc ura cies , ▁that ▁Sh af are v ich ▁mis ass igned ▁Jewish ▁eth nic ity ▁to ▁a ▁number ▁of ▁non - J ew ish ▁individuals ▁involved ▁in ▁the ▁execution ▁of ▁Nicholas ▁II , ▁perpet u ating ▁the ▁false ▁assertion ▁that ▁there ▁was ▁gra ff iti ▁in ▁Y idd ish ▁at ▁the ▁murder ▁site , ▁and ▁suggested ▁that ▁Sh af are v ich ' s ▁phrase ▁" N ich olas ▁II ▁was ▁shot ▁specifically ▁as ▁the ▁Ts ar , ▁and ▁this ▁rit ual ▁act ▁drew ▁a ▁line ▁under ▁an ▁epo ch ▁in ▁Russian ▁history " ▁– ▁may ▁be ▁read ▁as ▁blood ▁lib el . ▁( An ▁accus ation ▁which ▁ign ores ▁the ▁remainder ▁of ▁Sh af are v ich ' s ▁sentence : ▁" so ▁it ▁can ▁only ▁be ▁compared ▁with ▁the ▁execution ▁of ▁Charles ▁I ▁in ▁England ▁or ▁of ▁Louis ▁XVI ▁in ▁France ". ) ▁Ar on ▁K ats en elin bo igen , ▁wrote ▁that ▁Sh af are v ish ' s ▁work ▁" l ives ▁up ▁to ▁the ▁best ▁trad itions ▁of ▁ant is