▁where ▁Ari us ▁had ▁denied ▁the ▁cons ub st ant ial ▁div inity ▁of ▁Jesus , ▁E ut ych es ▁seemed ▁to ▁be ▁den ying ▁that ▁Jesus ▁was ▁fully ▁human . ▁Pope ▁Leo ▁I ▁wrote ▁that ▁E ut ych es ' ▁error ▁seemed ▁to ▁be ▁more ▁from ▁a ▁lack ▁of ▁skill ▁than ▁from ▁mal ice . ▁▁ ▁E ut ych es ▁had ▁been ▁acc using ▁various ▁person ages ▁of ▁cover t ▁N est or ian ism . ▁In ▁November ▁ 4 4 8 , ▁F lav ian , ▁Bishop ▁of ▁Constantin ople ▁held ▁a ▁local ▁syn od ▁regarding ▁a ▁point ▁of ▁discipline ▁connected ▁with ▁the ▁province ▁of ▁S ard is . ▁At ▁the ▁end ▁of ▁the ▁session ▁of ▁this ▁syn od ▁one ▁of ▁those ▁in cul p ated , ▁E use b ius , ▁Bishop ▁of ▁D ory la e um , ▁brought ▁a ▁counter ▁charge ▁of ▁her es y ▁against ▁the ▁arch im and rite . ▁E use b ius ▁demanded ▁that ▁E ut ych es ▁be ▁removed ▁from ▁office . ▁F lav ian ▁preferred ▁that ▁the ▁bishop ▁and ▁the ▁arch im and rite ▁sort ▁out ▁their ▁differences , ▁but ▁as ▁his ▁suggestion ▁went ▁un he eded , ▁E ut ych es ▁was ▁sum mon ed ▁to ▁clarify ▁his ▁position ▁regarding ▁the ▁nature ▁of ▁Christ . ▁Event ually ▁E ut ych es ▁rel uct antly ▁appeared , ▁but ▁his ▁position ▁was ▁considered ▁to ▁be ▁the olog ically ▁uns oph istic ated , ▁and ▁the ▁syn od ▁finding ▁his ▁answers ▁un respons ive