▁review ▁under ▁the ▁Administr ative ▁Pro cedure ▁Act ▁( AP A ). ▁National ▁Association ▁of ▁Man ufact ur ers ▁v . ▁Department ▁of ▁Def ense ▁( 2 0 1 8 ): ▁The ▁Court ▁un anim ously ▁ruled ▁that ▁the ▁E PA ▁cannot ▁shelter ▁its ▁“ w aters ▁of ▁the ▁United ▁States ” ▁rule ▁from ▁jud icial ▁review ▁by ▁arbitr arily ▁limit ing ▁where ▁vict ims ▁can ▁sue . ▁Minnesota ▁V ot ers ▁Alliance ▁v . ▁Mans ky ▁( 2 0 1 8 ): ▁The ▁Court ▁ruled ▁that ▁a ▁Minnesota ▁stat ute ▁prohib iting ▁individuals ▁from ▁we aring ▁political ▁app arel ▁at ▁a ▁pol ling ▁place ▁viol ates ▁the ▁Free ▁Spe ech ▁Cla use ▁of ▁the ▁First ▁Am end ment . ▁W ey er ha e user ▁Co . ▁v . ▁U . S . ▁Fish ▁& ▁Wild life ▁Service ▁( 2 0 1 8 ): ▁In ▁this ▁case ▁the ▁government , ▁under ▁the ▁End anger ed ▁Species ▁Act , ▁designated ▁private ▁land ▁in ▁Louisiana ▁as ▁a ▁potential ▁“ crit ical ▁habitat ” ▁for ▁the ▁dus ky ▁g opher ▁f rog , ▁enjo ining ▁the ▁pla int iffs ' ▁use ▁of ▁the ▁land . ▁However , ▁the ▁dus ky ▁g opher ▁f rog ▁does ▁not ▁inhab it ▁the ▁land , ▁nor ▁is ▁the ▁land ▁currently ▁suitable ▁for ▁use ▁as ▁its ▁habitat . ▁In ▁a ▁un anim ous ▁decision , ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁ruled ▁that ▁it ▁cannot ▁be ▁a ▁critical ▁habitat ▁if ▁it ▁is ▁not ▁a ▁habitat ▁and ▁rem and ed ▁to ▁the ▁ 5