▁El it estone ▁Limited ▁v ▁Morris ▁[ 1 9 9 7 ] ▁which ▁found ▁posit ively ▁in ▁favour ▁of ▁a ▁ch alet ▁being ▁an nex ed ▁as ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁land . ▁ ▁Fact s ▁Pope ▁r ented ▁since ▁ 1 9 9 3 ▁a ▁house bo at ▁where ▁he ▁lived ▁north ▁of ▁B atter se a ▁Bridge ▁on ▁the ▁left ▁bank , ▁a ground ▁for ▁half ▁of ▁the ▁time ▁due ▁to ▁its ▁position ▁and ▁the ▁t ide ▁( on ▁the ▁T ide way ). ▁The ▁owner ▁brought ▁possession ▁proceed ings ▁under ▁the ▁H ous ing ▁Act ▁ 1 9 9 8 ; ▁the ▁pre lim inary ▁legal ▁question ▁was ▁whether ▁this ▁was ▁the ▁correct ▁procedure ▁as ▁if ▁it ▁were ▁not ▁a ▁" d well ing " ▁it ▁would ▁instead ▁be ▁a ▁" ch att el " ▁so ▁possession ▁could ▁be ▁more ▁quickly ▁got ▁back ▁by ▁the ▁land l ord . ▁ ▁Dec ision ▁The ▁case ▁established ▁that ▁a ▁house bo at ▁does ▁not ▁form ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁land ▁which ▁is ▁not ▁in ▁common ▁ownership ▁( such ▁as ▁through ▁ad verse ▁possession ▁of ▁the ▁river ▁bed ) ▁as ▁the ▁degree ▁of ▁an nex ation ▁is ▁ins u fficient . ▁▁ ▁T uck ey ▁L J ▁gave ▁the ▁lead ▁judgment : ▁ ▁W aller ▁L J ▁agreed ▁giving ▁no ▁opinion . ▁ ▁Mor ritt ▁L J ▁gave ▁his ▁own ▁conc urr ing ▁opinion . ▁ ▁As ▁the ▁three ▁jud ges ▁agreed , ▁Ch else a ▁Y acht ▁and ▁Bo at ▁Club ▁could ▁recover ▁their