▁was ▁built ▁in ▁the ▁ 1 9 9 0 s ▁and ▁noted ▁the ▁way ▁that ▁the ▁" sh out y ▁pol ych rom atic ▁architecture " ▁of ▁the ▁development ▁" im print [ s ] ▁the ▁vista ▁with ▁a ▁b um pt ious , ▁las er - etch ed ▁precision ." ▁However , ▁he ▁expressed ▁concern ▁that ▁the ▁development ▁would ▁send ▁the ▁message ▁that ▁similar ▁projects ▁should ▁convey ▁" a ▁false ▁sense ▁of ▁worth " ▁by ▁being ▁similarly ▁dram atic . ▁He ▁critic ised ▁the ▁way ▁that ▁the ▁ter rac otta ▁fa ç ades ▁presented ▁an ▁overall ▁effect ▁that ▁was ▁" ne ither ▁beautiful ▁enough , ▁nor ▁sur real ▁enough , ▁to ▁be ▁truly ▁remarkable ", ▁present ing ▁an ▁effect ▁that ▁was ▁" st rik ing ▁but ▁not ▁reson ant . ▁Nothing ▁about ▁these ▁fa ç ades ▁ling ers ▁in ▁the ▁mind . ▁They ▁are , ▁odd ly , ▁bere ft ▁of ▁jo ie ▁de ▁viv re ." ▁ ▁The ▁Ob server ' s ▁critic ▁Row an ▁Moore ▁was ▁somewhat ▁more ▁positive , ▁calling ▁the ▁development ▁" a ▁Mar m ite ▁building ▁... ▁which ▁pass ers - by ▁either ▁hate ▁or ▁love ". ▁He ▁compared ▁it ▁to ▁" a ▁B - movie ▁... ▁in ▁which ▁giant ▁mut ant ▁che wy ▁swe ets ▁have , ▁following ▁a ▁radio active ▁accident , ▁inv aded ▁the ▁world ." ▁Non eth eless , ▁he ▁r ated ▁Central ▁Saint ▁G iles ▁as ▁" one ▁of ▁the ▁better " ▁of ▁the ▁recent ▁wave ▁of ▁commercial - c ivil ▁develop