▁of ▁oblig ations ▁and ▁the ▁proper ▁use ▁of ▁court ▁time ▁and ▁prison ▁facilities . ▁It ▁could ▁we igh ▁up ▁all ▁the ▁compet ing ▁consider ations ▁and ▁take ▁account ▁of ▁cost ▁imp lications ▁and ▁the ▁avail ability ▁of ▁court ▁and ▁prison ▁officials . ▁If ▁the ▁legisl ature ▁chose ▁to ▁undert ake ▁such ▁an ▁investigation , ▁it ▁would ▁have ▁to ▁operate , ▁Sach s ▁J ▁suggested , ▁within ▁the ▁following ▁framework : ▁▁ ▁The ▁process ▁should ▁not ▁permit ▁the ▁imprison ment ▁of ▁persons ▁merely ▁because ▁they ▁were ▁unable ▁to ▁pay ▁their ▁contract ual ▁deb ts . ▁ ▁The ▁procedures ▁adopted ▁would ▁have ▁to ▁be ▁manifest ly ▁fair ▁in ▁all ▁the ▁circumstances . ▁ ▁Im pr ison ment , ▁involving ▁as ▁it ▁does ▁a ▁major ▁in fr ing ement ▁of ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁personal ▁freedom , ▁would ▁have ▁to ▁be ▁the ▁only ▁reason ably ▁available ▁way ▁of ▁ach ieving ▁the ▁stated ▁object ives . ▁ ▁Sach s ▁J ▁held ▁further ▁that , ▁in ▁determ ining ▁whether ▁or ▁not ▁the ▁good ▁could ▁be ▁sever ed ▁from ▁the ▁bad ▁legisl ation , ▁and ▁whether ▁or ▁not ▁the ▁legisl ature ▁would ▁have ▁en act ed ▁what ▁surv ived ▁on ▁its ▁own , ▁the ▁court ▁must ▁take ▁account ▁of ▁the ▁coming ▁into ▁force ▁of ▁the ▁new ▁Constitution , ▁in ▁terms ▁of ▁which ▁the ▁Court ▁received ▁its ▁juris diction , ▁and ▁pay ▁due ▁regard ▁to ▁those ▁values ▁which ▁it ▁requires ▁the ▁court ▁to ▁promote . ▁The ▁court ▁must ▁accordingly ▁posit ▁a ▁not ional , ▁contemporary ▁Parliament ▁dealing ▁with ▁the ▁text ▁in