omen on ] ▁von ▁einer ▁hö h ern ▁Art ." ▁ ▁In ▁his ▁approach ▁to ▁disease ▁diagn oses ▁and ▁treatment , ▁H ahn emann ▁avoided ▁what ▁Go ethe ▁considered ▁the ▁‘ gre at est ▁failure ’ ▁( Un he il ) ▁and ▁fault ▁of ▁material ▁science , ▁namely ▁the ▁separation ▁of ▁experiment er ▁from ▁nature , ▁producing ▁abstract ▁hypoth eses ▁( not ions ) ▁and ▁artificial ▁( k ünst lich ) ▁approaches / tre at ments ▁based ▁on ▁an ▁accum ulation ▁of ▁dispar ate ▁facts , ▁rather ▁than ▁seeing ▁nature ▁as ▁a ▁complex ▁web ▁of ▁associations , ▁and ▁understanding , ▁as ▁did ▁H ahn emann ▁and ▁Go ethe ▁that ▁" s cient ific ▁knowledge ▁emer ges ▁out ▁of ▁relationships ▁and ▁historical ▁context s ." ▁ ▁H ah emann ▁also ▁sought ▁to ▁understand ▁disease ▁in ▁its ▁historical ▁pro gression , ▁as ▁in ▁the ▁case ▁of ▁his ▁Wes ens geschichte ▁of ▁Ps ora , ▁the ▁arch et ype ▁( ton ic ) ▁of ▁inherited ▁chron ic ▁disease , ▁as ▁well ▁as ▁its ▁ple omorphic ▁unfold ing ▁via ▁numerous ▁( grad ated ) ▁levels ▁of ▁secondary ▁( path ic ) ▁dise ases , ▁which ▁then ▁required ▁a ▁sequ ential ▁( scal ar ) ▁approach ▁to ▁treatment . ▁Go ethe ' s ▁morph ological ▁ins ights ▁provide ▁the ▁theoretical ▁basis ▁for ▁H ahn emann ' s ▁empir ical ▁discover ies ▁and ▁living ▁experiments ▁(' prov ings ' ▁or ▁Er l ben isse ). ▁In ▁these ▁prov ings , ▁H ahn emann ▁sought ▁to ▁cont em plate ▁the