▁their ▁proper ▁districts . ▁Judge ▁George ▁G . ▁Wright ▁stated ▁how ▁he ▁conced ed ▁that ▁the ▁law ▁made ▁no ▁distinction ▁as ▁to ▁the ▁rights ▁of ▁children ▁between ▁the ▁ages ▁of ▁five ▁and ▁twenty - one ▁and ▁how ▁all ▁people ▁have ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁attend ▁common ▁schools . ▁He ▁believed ▁that ▁this ▁right ▁was ▁recognized ▁by ▁the ▁direct ors ▁in ▁this ▁case ▁and ▁he ▁stated ▁“ ▁I ▁cannot ▁admit ▁that ▁the ▁ref us al ▁to ▁admit ▁this ▁scholar ▁into ▁this ▁particular ▁school ▁was ▁so ▁wrong ful ▁as ▁that ▁the ▁courts ▁should ▁inter f ere ▁by ▁mand am us .” ▁Judge ▁George ▁G . ▁Wright ▁also ▁made ▁it ▁clear ▁that ▁if ▁Susan ▁was ▁allowed ▁to ▁go ▁to ▁a ▁school ▁that ▁was ▁in ▁the ▁proper ▁district , ▁then ▁he ▁didn ' t ▁know ▁of ▁any ▁principle ▁in ▁which ▁she ▁could ▁comp lain ▁about . ▁He ▁believed ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁not ▁Susan ' s ▁or ▁her ▁father ’ s ▁decision ▁to ▁make , ▁but ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁the ▁school ▁board ' s ▁decision . ▁ ▁Comment ary ▁ ▁The ▁Dra ke ▁Law ▁Review ▁published ▁articles ▁based ▁on ▁present ations ▁at ▁the ▁“ Cl ark ▁ 1 5 0 ” ▁conference ▁held ▁at ▁Dra ke ▁University ▁in ▁ 2 0 1 8 ▁obser ving ▁the ▁ 1 5 0 th ▁anni versary ▁of ▁the ▁ 1 8 6 8 ▁land mark ▁r uling ▁by ▁the ▁Iowa ▁Supreme ▁Court . ▁ ▁School ▁named ▁for ▁Susan ▁Clark ▁ ▁In ▁ 2 0 1 9 ▁the ▁Board ▁of ▁Education ▁of ▁the