▁has ▁been ▁just ▁as ▁it ▁used ▁to ▁be ▁before ▁the ▁Act : ▁to ▁read ▁out ▁particular ▁pass ages ▁and ▁say ▁" Now ▁do ▁you ▁call ▁that ▁moral ? ", ▁or ▁" Do ▁you ▁think ▁that ▁is ▁a ▁good ▁bit ▁of ▁writing ?" ▁The ▁one ▁thing ▁which ▁this ▁Act ▁has ▁made ▁plain ▁is ▁that ▁in ▁future , ▁in ▁fair ness ▁to ▁the ▁author , ▁the ▁book ▁must ▁be ▁jud ged ▁as ▁a ▁whole ." ▁In ▁reference ▁to ▁the ▁des ira b ility ▁of ▁publication ▁Gard iner ▁invited ▁the ▁j ury ▁to ▁consider ▁that , ▁" In ▁my ▁submission ▁to ▁you ▁the ▁defend ants ▁have ▁shown , ▁on ▁the ▁balance ▁of ▁prob abilities , ▁that ▁it ▁would ▁be ▁for ▁the ▁public ▁good ▁that ▁this ▁book ▁should ▁be ▁generally ▁available . ▁I ▁say ▁on ▁the ▁balance ▁of ▁prob abilities ▁because ▁... ▁where ▁the ▁pro sec ution ▁has ▁to ▁establish ▁something ▁in ▁a ▁criminal ▁case ▁the ▁bur den ▁which ▁rest s ▁on ▁them ▁is ▁to ▁satisfy ▁a ▁j ury ▁beyond ▁a ▁reasonable ▁doubt ; ▁where ▁the ▁defence ▁have ▁to ▁dis charge ▁some ▁bur den ▁of ▁proof ▁it ▁is ▁a ▁less er ▁bur den , ▁it ▁is ▁the ▁bur den ▁of ▁satisfying ▁a ▁j ury ▁on ▁a ▁mere ▁balance ▁of ▁prob abilities ." ▁And ▁in ▁referring ▁to ▁the ▁judge ' s ▁r uling ▁on ▁the ▁adm iss ibility ▁of ▁other ▁books ▁for ▁comparison ▁Gard iner ▁simply ▁entre ated ▁the ▁j ury : ▁" All ▁you ▁can ▁do ▁is ▁to ▁judge ▁it ▁as ▁a ▁whole ▁in ▁the ▁existing ▁climate