▁the ▁state ▁conduct ▁that ▁led ▁to ▁the ▁Char ter ▁bre ach ▁( which ▁includes ▁an ▁analysis ▁of ▁whether ▁the ▁bre ach ▁was ▁deliber ate ▁or ▁will ful , ▁and ▁whether ▁the ▁officers ▁were ▁acting ▁in ▁good ▁faith ), ▁Imp act ▁on ▁the ▁Char ter - Pro te cted ▁Inter ests ▁of ▁the ▁Acc used , ▁which ▁focus es ▁on ▁how ▁the ▁accused ▁person ▁was ▁affected ▁by ▁the ▁state ▁conduct ▁( which ▁includes ▁an ▁analysis ▁of ▁the ▁intr us iveness ▁into ▁the ▁person ' s ▁priv acy , ▁the ▁direct ▁impact ▁on ▁the ▁right ▁not ▁to ▁be ▁forced ▁to ▁self - inc rim inate , ▁and ▁the ▁effect ▁on ▁the ▁person ' s ▁human ▁dign ity ), ▁and ▁Society ' s ▁Interest ▁in ▁an ▁Ad jud ic ation ▁on ▁the ▁Mer its , ▁which ▁focus es ▁on ▁how ▁reliable ▁the ▁evidence ▁is ▁in ▁light ▁of ▁the ▁nature ▁of ▁the ▁Char ter ▁bre ach . ▁ ▁After ▁applying ▁all ▁three ▁in qui ries ▁into ▁the ▁evidence ▁obtained ▁from ▁Mr . ▁Grant , ▁the ▁majority ▁found ▁that ▁the ▁gun ▁should ▁not ▁be ▁ex cluded ▁as ▁evidence ▁against ▁Mr . ▁Grant . ▁ ▁B inn ie ▁J ▁agreed ▁entirely ▁with ▁the ▁majority ' s ▁analysis ▁of ▁section ▁ 2 4 ( 2 ). ▁D esch amps ▁J ▁agreed ▁that ▁the ▁Collins ▁test ▁needed ▁replacing , ▁but ▁disag re ed ▁with ▁the ▁majority ' s ▁proposed ▁test . ▁Non eth eless , ▁she ▁agreed ▁with ▁the ▁majority ' s ▁ult imate ▁conclusion ▁that ▁the ▁gun ▁should ▁not ▁be