▁as ▁in ▁the ▁case ▁of ▁Greek ▁philosophy ▁or ▁in ▁the ▁case ▁of ▁Christian ity , ▁as ▁a ▁modified ▁deriv ation ▁from ▁its ▁orig ins ▁in ▁Israel . ▁ ▁Par s ons ▁and ▁Hab erm as ▁The ▁difference ▁between ▁Par s ons ▁and ▁J ürgen ▁Hab erm as ▁lies ▁essentially ▁in ▁how ▁Hab erm as ▁uses ▁Par s ons ' ▁theory ▁to ▁establish ▁the ▁basic ▁propos itions ▁of ▁his ▁own . ▁Hab erm as ▁takes ▁the ▁division ▁between ▁Par s ons ' ▁separation ▁between ▁the ▁" outer " ▁and ▁the ▁" inner " ▁dimensions ▁of ▁the ▁social ▁system ▁and ▁labels ▁them ▁" system " ▁( outer ▁dimension ▁( A - G )) ▁and ▁" l if ew orld " ▁( inner ▁dimension ▁( I - L )). ▁The ▁problem ▁with ▁this ▁model ▁from ▁Par s ons ' ▁point ▁of ▁view ▁is ▁a ) ▁that ▁conflict ▁within ▁the ▁social ▁system ▁can ▁in ▁reality ▁emer ge ▁from ▁any ▁rel ational ▁point ▁and ▁not ▁simply ▁from ▁the ▁system - l if ew orld ▁dich ot omy , ▁and ▁b ) ▁by ▁rel ating ▁the ▁system - l if ew orld ▁model ▁to ▁some ▁kind ▁of ▁" li ber ation " - ep ic , ▁Hab erm as ▁produces ▁the ▁U top ian ▁notion ▁that ▁the ▁potential ity ▁of ▁conflict ▁within ▁the ▁social ▁system ▁has ▁some ▁kind ▁of ▁" final ▁solution ," ▁which ▁produces ▁a ▁mis leading ▁concept ▁of ▁the ▁nature ▁of ▁system ic ▁conflict . ▁ ▁General ▁theory ▁It ▁is ▁important ▁to ▁highlight ▁that ▁Par s ons