▁a ▁reasonable ▁request ▁to ▁ren ounce ▁their ▁property ▁except ▁for ▁what ▁would ▁be ▁required ▁for ▁their ▁su sten ance ▁if ▁they ▁were ▁to ▁depart , ▁thus ▁assim il ating ▁their ▁position ▁to ▁that ▁of ▁religious ▁with ▁solemn ▁v ows . ▁These ▁changes ▁resulted ▁in ▁a ▁bl urr ing ▁of ▁the ▁previously ▁clear ▁distinction ▁between ▁" orders " ▁and ▁" con greg ations ", ▁since ▁instit utes ▁that ▁were ▁founded ▁as ▁" con greg ations " ▁began ▁to ▁have ▁some ▁members ▁who ▁had ▁all ▁three ▁solemn ▁v ows ▁or ▁had ▁members ▁that ▁took ▁a ▁solemn ▁v ow ▁of ▁pover ty ▁and ▁simple ▁v ows ▁of ▁ch ast ity ▁and ▁ob ed ience . ▁ ▁Current ▁jur id icial ▁status ▁ ▁The ▁current ▁Code ▁of ▁Can on ▁Law , ▁which ▁came ▁into ▁force ▁in ▁ 1 9 8 3 , ▁maintain s ▁the ▁distinction ▁between ▁solemn ▁and ▁simple ▁v ows , ▁but ▁no ▁longer ▁makes ▁any ▁distinction ▁between ▁their ▁jur id ical ▁effects , ▁including ▁the ▁distinction ▁between ▁" orders " ▁and ▁" con greg ations ". ▁It ▁has ▁accordingly ▁dropped ▁the ▁language ▁of ▁the ▁ 1 9 1 7 ▁code ▁and ▁uses ▁the ▁single ▁term ▁" rel ig ious ▁inst itute " ▁( which ▁appears ▁now here ▁in ▁the ▁ 1 9 1 7 ▁Code ) ▁to ▁design ate ▁all ▁such ▁instit utes ▁of ▁consec r ated ▁life ▁al ike . ▁ ▁In ▁the ▁current ▁Code ▁of ▁Can on ▁Law , ▁the ▁word ▁" con greg ation " ▁is ▁never ▁used ▁of ▁a ▁class