▁Mah omed ▁D P , ▁A ck ermann ▁J , ▁Did c ott ▁J , ▁Kent ridge ▁A J , ▁Lang a ▁J , ▁Mad ala ▁J , ▁M ok g oro ▁J , ▁O ' Reg an ▁J ▁and ▁Sach s ▁J ▁conc urr ing ) ▁that ▁to ▁determine ▁whether ▁or ▁not ▁the ▁right ▁provided ▁for ▁in ▁section ▁ 1 1 ( 1 ) ▁of ▁the ▁Constitution — " every ▁person ▁shall ▁have ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁freedom ▁and ▁security ▁of ▁the ▁person , ▁which ▁shall ▁include ▁the ▁right ▁not ▁to ▁be ▁det ained ▁without ▁trial " — was ▁limited ▁by ▁the ▁various ▁prov isions ▁of ▁sections ▁ 6 5 A ▁to ▁ 6 5 M ▁of ▁the ▁Act , ▁it ▁really ▁would ▁not ▁be ▁necessary ▁to ▁determine ▁the ▁outer ▁boundaries ▁of ▁the ▁right . ▁Nor ▁would ▁it ▁be ▁necessary ▁to ▁examine ▁the ▁philosoph ical ▁foundation ▁or ▁the ▁precise ▁content ▁of ▁the ▁right . ▁C ertain ly ▁to ▁put ▁someone ▁in ▁prison ▁is ▁to ▁limit ▁that ▁person ' s ▁right ▁to ▁freedom ; ▁to ▁do ▁so ▁without ▁any ▁criminal ▁charge ▁being ▁level led , ▁or ▁any ▁trial ▁being ▁held , ▁is ▁manifest ly ▁a ▁radical ▁enc ro achment ▁upon ▁that ▁right . ▁ ▁Accept ing ▁that ▁the ▁goal ▁of ▁sections ▁ 6 5 A ▁to ▁ 6 5 M ▁was ▁to ▁provide ▁a ▁mechanism ▁for ▁the ▁enfor cement ▁of ▁judgment ▁deb ts , ▁and ▁recogn ising ▁that ▁such ▁goal ▁is ▁a ▁legit imate ▁and ▁reasonable ▁government al ▁objective , ▁Krieg ler ▁J ▁determined