▁that ▁God ▁is ▁a ▁complete ▁being ▁before ▁the ▁creation ▁of ▁the ▁world . ▁O thers ▁find ▁that ▁his ▁argument ▁about ▁God ' s ▁per fection ▁is ▁fla wed ▁by ▁confusing ▁exist ential ▁necessity ▁with ▁logical ▁necessity . ▁ ▁In ▁classical ▁Protest ant ▁and ▁Evangel ical ▁thought , ▁Hart sh or ne ' s ▁the ology ▁has ▁received ▁strong ▁criticism . ▁In ▁these ▁the ological ▁networks ▁Hart sh or ne ' s ▁pan ent he ist ▁re inter pret ation ▁of ▁God ' s ▁nature ▁has ▁been ▁de emed ▁to ▁be ▁in compatible ▁with ▁Bib lic al ▁revel ation ▁and ▁the ▁classic ▁cre ed al ▁form ulations ▁of ▁the ▁Tr inity . ▁Crit ics ▁such ▁as ▁Roy ce ▁Gordon ▁Gru en ler ▁( born ▁January ▁ 1 0 , ▁ 1 9 3 0 ), ▁Ron ald ▁Nash ▁and ▁Norman ▁Ge is ler ▁argue ▁that ▁Hart sh or ne ▁does ▁not ▁offer ▁a ▁tri person al ▁view ▁of ▁the ▁Tr inity , ▁and ▁instead ▁his ▁interpretation ▁of ▁Christ ▁( Christ ology ) ▁has ▁some ▁aff in ities ▁with ▁the ▁early ▁her es y ▁of ▁the ▁Eb ion ites . ▁It ▁is ▁also ▁argued ▁that ▁Hart sh or ne ' s ▁the ology ▁ent ails ▁a ▁den ial ▁of ▁divine ▁for ek now ledge ▁and ▁pred est ination ▁to ▁salv ation . ▁Hart sh or ne ▁is ▁also ▁critic ized ▁for ▁his ▁den ial ▁or ▁de valu ing ▁of ▁Christ ' s ▁m ira cles ▁and ▁the ▁super natural ▁events ▁mentioned ▁in ▁the ▁Bible .