, ▁who ▁had ▁employed ▁a ▁practice ▁of ▁dece iving ▁its ▁vict ims ▁by ▁redirect ing ▁their ▁susp ic ions . ▁Lok sh in ' s ▁son ▁claimed ▁that ▁the ▁aim ▁of ▁these ▁efforts ▁was ▁to ▁defend ▁an ▁active ▁agent ▁of ▁the ▁secret ▁police . ▁The ▁arguments ▁and ▁documents ▁obtained ▁by ▁Lok sh in ' s ▁son ▁persu aded ▁Y el ena ▁Bon ner ▁to ▁stand ▁up ▁for ▁Lok sh in . ▁On ▁ 8 ▁January ▁ 2 0 0 9 ▁Bon ner ▁wrote : ▁" From ▁a ▁certain ▁point ▁I ▁have ▁no ▁more ▁relation ▁to ▁the ▁museum ▁[ i . e . ▁the ▁Sak har ov ▁Center ] ▁… ▁since ▁I ▁did ▁not ▁find ▁Aleks andr ▁Lok sh in ' s ’ s ▁[ i . e . the ▁composer ' s ▁son ] ▁address ▁[ I ▁ask ] ▁to ▁let ▁him ▁know ▁that ▁I ▁asked ▁a ▁member ▁of ▁the ▁Public ▁Commission ▁to ▁ask ▁the ▁director ▁of ▁the ▁museum ▁to ▁take ▁away ▁from ▁the ▁site ▁the ▁material ▁mentioned ▁by ▁Aleks andr ▁Lok sh in . ▁And ▁more ▁than ▁that ▁– ▁I ▁am ▁always ▁on ▁my ▁guard ▁when ▁I ▁consider ▁all ▁the ▁supposed ly ▁un mask ing ▁materials . ▁And ▁in ▁the ▁most ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁cases ▁I ▁do ▁not ▁trust ▁them ." ▁It ▁is ▁also ▁impossible ▁to ▁ignore ▁the ▁historical ▁fact ▁that ▁Lok sh in ' s ▁Re qu iem ▁was ▁performed ▁at ▁the ▁closing ▁of ▁the ▁IV ▁Conference ▁" Res istance ▁in ▁the ▁Gul ag " ▁( 2 0 0 2 ).