6 ▁then ▁provides ▁a ▁particular ▁rule ▁for ▁Quebec , ▁requiring ▁that ▁the ▁three ▁jud ges ▁from ▁Quebec ▁must ▁be ▁appointed ▁from ▁either ▁the ▁superior ▁courts ▁of ▁Quebec , ▁or ▁" am ong ▁the ▁advoc ates ▁of ▁that ▁province ." ▁ ▁The ▁general ▁rule ▁in ▁section ▁ 5 ▁clearly ▁included ▁former ▁members ▁of ▁the ▁bars ▁of ▁the ▁provinces ▁as ▁el ig ible ▁to ▁be ▁appointed . ▁ ▁The ▁issue ▁was ▁whether ▁the ▁word ing ▁of ▁section ▁ 6 ▁restricted ▁that ▁general ▁rule ▁to ▁current ▁members ▁of ▁the ▁bar ▁of ▁Quebec ▁for ▁the ▁Quebec ▁seats ▁on ▁the ▁Court . ▁ ▁Dec ision ▁of ▁the ▁Court ▁ ▁The ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁ruled , ▁by ▁a ▁ 6 – 1 ▁decision , ▁that ▁only ▁current ▁members ▁of ▁the ▁Quebec ▁superior ▁courts ▁and ▁current ▁members ▁of ▁the ▁bar ▁of ▁Quebec ▁are ▁el ig ible ▁to ▁be ▁appointed ▁to ▁the ▁Quebec ▁seats ▁on ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court . ▁ ▁Major ity ▁decision ▁The ▁majority ▁decision ▁was ▁attributed ▁to ▁all ▁six ▁of ▁the ▁jud ges ▁in ▁the ▁majority , ▁rather ▁than ▁to ▁a ▁single ▁judge . ▁The ▁Court ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁am end ment ▁to ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁Act ▁was ▁not ▁simply ▁declar atory ▁of ▁the ▁previous ▁law , ▁but ▁an ▁actual ▁change ▁to ▁the ▁composition ▁of ▁the ▁Court , ▁and ▁was ▁therefore ▁ult ra ▁v ires ▁federal ▁Parliament . ▁A ▁change ▁to ▁the ▁composition ▁of ▁the ▁Court ▁can ▁only ▁be ▁made ▁by ▁a ▁un anim ous ▁constitution al ▁am end ment ▁under ▁s . ▁ 4 1 ▁of ▁the ▁Constitution ▁Act