▁ 6 5 M ▁in ▁their ▁trunc ated ▁form , ▁or ▁else ▁to ▁modify ▁them ▁in ▁the ▁light ▁of ▁the ▁principles ▁en unci ated ▁by ▁the ▁Court . ▁ ▁Sach s ▁J ▁accordingly ▁con cur red ▁in ▁the ▁form ulation ▁of ▁the ▁order ▁in ▁the ▁judgment ▁of ▁Krieg ler ▁J ▁as ▁set ▁out ▁above . ▁ ▁Test ing ▁constitution ality ▁ ▁Sach s ▁J ▁added ▁that , ▁although ▁notion ally ▁the ▁court , ▁in ▁testing ▁the ▁constitution ality ▁of ▁legisl ative ▁prov isions , ▁proceed s ▁in ▁two ▁distinct ▁analyt ical ▁stages , ▁there ▁is ▁clearly ▁a ▁relationship ▁between ▁the ▁two ▁cur ial ▁en qui ries . ▁The ▁more ▁prof ound ▁the ▁interest ▁being ▁protected , ▁and ▁the ▁gra ver ▁the ▁viol ation , ▁the ▁more ▁string ent ▁the ▁scr ut iny . ▁In ▁the ▁end , ▁the ▁court ▁must ▁decide ▁whether , ▁bearing ▁in ▁mind ▁the ▁nature ▁and ▁intensity ▁of ▁the ▁interest ▁to ▁be ▁protected , ▁as ▁well ▁as ▁the ▁degree ▁to ▁which ▁and ▁the ▁manner ▁in ▁which ▁it ▁is ▁in fr ing ed , ▁the ▁limitation ▁provided ▁for ▁in ▁section ▁ 3 3 ▁is ▁perm iss ible . ▁ ▁The ▁two - stage ▁process , ▁Sach s ▁J ▁held , ▁should ▁not ▁be ▁approached ▁in ▁a ▁mechanical ▁and ▁sequ entially ▁divided ▁way , ▁without ▁pay ing ▁sufficient ▁attention ▁to ▁the ▁common al ities ▁that ▁run ▁through ▁the ▁two ▁stages . ▁Fa ith ful ness ▁to ▁the ▁Constitution ▁is ▁best ▁achieved , ▁he ▁felt , ▁by ▁loc ating ▁the ▁two - stage