▁to ▁both ▁anal ▁sex ▁and ▁or al ▁sex , ▁and ▁so ▁allowed ▁Florida ▁police ▁and ▁courts ▁to ▁continue ▁with ▁arr ests ▁and ▁conv ict ions ▁for ▁such ▁de eds . ▁ ▁For ▁instance , ▁in ▁Thomas ▁v . ▁State , ▁the ▁court ▁said : ▁ ▁We ▁ad here ▁to ▁recent ▁dec isions ▁of ▁this ▁Court ▁holding ▁that ▁the ▁words ▁" unn atural ▁and ▁las c iv ious " ▁as ▁used ▁in ▁Section ▁ 8 0 0 . 0 2 , ▁Florida ▁Stat utes , ▁are ▁not ▁void ▁for ▁v ag uen ess ▁and ▁that ▁these ▁words ▁are ▁of ▁such ▁a ▁character ▁that ▁an ▁ordinary ▁citiz en ▁can ▁easily ▁determine ▁what ▁character ▁or ▁act ▁is ▁intended . ▁ ▁These ▁cases ▁included , ▁among ▁others : ▁ ▁Morris ▁v . ▁State , ▁ 2 6 1 ▁So . ▁ 2 d ▁ 5 6 3 , ▁April ▁ 7 , ▁ 1 9 7 2 ▁With ers po on ▁v . ▁State , ▁ 2 7 8 ▁So . ▁ 2 d ▁ 6 1 1 , ▁May ▁ 3 0 , ▁ 1 9 7 3 ▁State ▁v . ▁F as ano , ▁ 2 8 4 ▁So . ▁ 2 d ▁ 6 8 3 , ▁October ▁ 1 7 , ▁ 1 9 7 3 ▁Thomas ▁v . ▁State , ▁ 3 2 6 ▁So . ▁ 2 d ▁ 4 1 3 , ▁December ▁ 3 , ▁ 1 9 7 5 ▁ ▁Legisl ation ▁ ▁The ▁ 1 9 7