▁coordinate ▁and ▁explain ▁these ▁facts . ▁Religion , ▁on ▁the ▁other ▁hand , ▁oper ates ▁in ▁the ▁equally ▁important , ▁but ▁utter ly ▁different , ▁real m ▁of ▁human ▁purposes , ▁mean ings , ▁and ▁values — subject s ▁that ▁the ▁fact ual ▁domain ▁of ▁science ▁might ▁ill uminate , ▁but ▁can ▁never ▁resolve ." ▁" Th ese ▁two ▁mag ister ia ▁do ▁not ▁overlap , ▁nor ▁do ▁they ▁en comp ass ▁all ▁inqu iry ▁( cons ider , ▁for ▁example , ▁the ▁mag ister ium ▁of ▁art ▁and ▁the ▁meaning ▁of ▁beauty ). " ▁ ▁G ould ▁emphas ized ▁the ▁legit im acy ▁of ▁each ▁field ▁of ▁ende avor ▁only ▁within ▁its ▁appropriate ▁area ▁of ▁inqu iry : ▁" NO MA ▁also ▁cut s ▁both ▁ways . ▁If ▁religion ▁can ▁no ▁longer ▁dict ate ▁the ▁nature ▁of ▁fact ual ▁conclus ions ▁res iding ▁properly ▁within ▁the ▁mag ister ium ▁of ▁science , ▁then ▁scient ists ▁cannot ▁claim ▁higher ▁insight ▁into ▁moral ▁truth ▁from ▁any ▁superior ▁knowledge ▁of ▁the ▁world ' s ▁empir ical ▁constitution ." ▁In ▁the ▁chapter ▁" NO MA ▁Def ined ▁and ▁Def ended " ▁G ould ▁gave ▁examples ▁of ▁the ▁types ▁of ▁questions ▁appropriate ▁to ▁each ▁area ▁of ▁inqu iry , ▁on ▁the ▁topic ▁of ▁" our ▁relationship ▁with ▁other ▁living ▁cre atures ": ▁" Do ▁humans ▁look ▁so ▁much ▁like ▁ap es ▁because ▁we ▁share ▁a ▁recent ▁common ▁ancest or ▁or ▁because ▁creation ▁followed ▁a ▁linear ▁order , ▁with ▁ap es ▁representing ▁the ▁step ▁just ▁below ▁us ?"