mes , ▁Jr . ▁proved ▁more ▁memor able ▁in ▁time , ▁with ▁its ▁el o quent ▁pron oun cement ▁that ▁"[ t ] he ▁great ▁ordin ances ▁of ▁the ▁Constitution ▁do ▁not ▁establish ▁and ▁divide ▁fields ▁of ▁black ▁and ▁white . ▁Even ▁the ▁more ▁specific ▁of ▁them ▁are ▁found ▁to ▁terminate ▁in ▁a ▁pen um bra ▁sh ading ▁gradually ▁from ▁one ▁extreme ▁to ▁the ▁other ." ▁ ▁Mal col m ' s ▁majority ▁opinion ▁in ▁Rub i ▁v . ▁Provin cial ▁Board , ▁ 3 3 ▁Phil . ▁ 6 6 0 ▁( 1 9 1 9 ), ▁remains ▁controvers ial ▁to ▁date . ▁The ▁Court ▁there in ▁aff ir med ▁a ▁provincial ▁government ▁resolution ▁directed ▁at ▁the ▁Mang yan ▁eth nic ▁minor ity , ▁requiring ▁the ▁conf in ement ▁of ▁members ▁of ▁" non - Christ ian ▁tribes " ▁to ▁a ▁spe cially ▁created ▁res ervation . ▁L ik ening ▁the ▁pl ight ▁of ▁the ▁Mang yan ▁to ▁that ▁of ▁Native ▁Americans , ▁the ▁Court ▁class ified ▁the ▁Mang yan ▁as ▁" wards ▁of ▁the ▁Filip ino ". ▁" By ▁the ▁fost ering ▁care ▁of ▁a ▁wise ▁Government , ▁may ▁not ▁these ▁un fortun ates ▁advance ▁in ▁the ▁" hab its ▁and ▁arts ▁of ▁civil ization ?" ▁Would ▁it ▁be ▁advis able ▁for ▁the ▁courts ▁to ▁intr ude ▁upon ▁a ▁plan , ▁carefully ▁form ulated , ▁and ▁apparently ▁working ▁out ▁for ▁the ▁ult imate ▁good ▁of ▁these ▁people ?" ▁ ▁In ▁B agu io ▁City ▁housing ▁the ▁summer ▁qu arters ▁of ▁the