hip ▁/ ▁Ca LP ) ▁ ▁Human itar ian ▁inclusion ▁standards ▁for ▁older ▁people ▁and ▁people ▁with ▁dis abilities ▁( Help Age ▁International , ▁Age ▁and ▁Dis ability ▁Cap acity ▁Program ▁/ ▁AD C AP ) ▁ ▁Fund ing ▁From ▁the ▁beginning , ▁a ▁decision ▁was ▁made ▁that ▁an ▁important ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁fund ing ▁would ▁come ▁from ▁the ▁spons oring ▁ag encies ▁themselves , ▁with ▁the ▁remainder ▁made ▁up ▁of ▁funds ▁from ▁government al ▁ag encies . ▁A ▁little ▁over ▁a ▁quarter ▁of ▁the ▁funds ▁for ▁phase ▁ 1 ▁came ▁from ▁the ▁S CH R ▁and ▁Inter Action ▁with ▁the ▁rest ▁coming ▁from ▁ 1 0 ▁govern ments . ▁ ▁As ▁the ▁budget ▁expanded ▁in ▁Ph ases ▁ 2 ▁and ▁ 3 , ▁so ▁did ▁the ▁number ▁of ▁government ▁don ors , ▁sh ifting ▁the ▁balance , ▁with ▁govern ments ▁contrib uting ▁about ▁ 8 5 % ▁of ▁the ▁funds ▁for ▁the ▁latter ▁two ▁phases . ▁ ▁Crit ic isms ▁of ▁S phere ▁ ▁Although ▁generally ▁well ▁accepted , ▁a ▁number ▁of ▁critic isms ▁have ▁been ▁level led ▁against ▁S phere ▁both ▁in ▁terms ▁of ▁its ▁human itar ian ▁char ter ▁and ▁minimum ▁standards . ▁ ▁The ▁first ▁critique ▁concerns ▁the ▁S phere ▁char ter . ▁As ▁the ▁char ter ▁was ▁developed ▁by ▁N GO s , ▁its ▁legal ▁valid ity ▁has ▁been ▁called ▁into ▁question . ▁ ▁The ▁char ter ▁recogn izes ▁that ▁affected ▁persons ▁have ▁a ▁‘ right ▁of ▁assistance ’ ▁and ▁describes ▁the ▁legal ▁responsibility ▁of ▁states ▁to ▁guarantee