1 9 9 5 , ▁p .   6 0 ). ▁ ▁There ▁can ▁also ▁be ▁morph ological ▁complex ▁link ▁n oun s , ▁which ▁involve ▁a ▁bound ▁n oun ▁or ▁a ▁location ▁n oun ▁in ▁the ▁first ▁position , ▁with ▁the ▁link ▁n oun ▁in ▁the ▁second ▁( O sum i , ▁ 1 9 9 5 , ▁p .   6 4 ). ▁ ▁Although ▁the ▁examples ▁represented ▁are ▁not ▁compreh ensive ▁for ▁both ▁bound ▁and ▁link ▁n oun s , ▁they ▁show ▁that ▁there ▁is ▁no ▁struct ural ▁distinction ▁between ▁the ▁two ▁sub classes . ▁Analysis ▁of ▁a ▁T î r î ▁cor pus ▁by ▁Mid ori ▁O sum i ▁( 1 9 9 5 , ▁p .   6 5 ) ▁found ▁that ▁there ▁were ▁thirty - three ▁bound ▁n oun s ▁referring ▁to ▁external ▁body ▁parts ▁compared ▁to ▁only ▁five ▁link ▁n oun s . ▁This ▁indicates ▁that ▁there ▁are ▁semantic ▁differences ▁between ▁sub classes . ▁For ▁example , ▁among ▁the ▁five ▁link ▁n oun s ▁is ▁ao - ▁‘ che ek ’ ▁is ▁the ▁only ▁one ▁that ▁refers ▁to ▁external ▁human ▁body ▁parts ▁while ▁others ▁refer ▁to ▁external ▁animal ▁and ▁insect ▁parts ▁( O sum i , ▁ 1 9 9 5 , ▁p .   6 5 ). ▁This ▁shows ▁that ▁all ▁external ▁human ▁body ▁parts ▁are ▁bound ▁n oun s , ▁except ▁for ▁ao - ▁in ▁T î r î ▁( O sum i , ▁ 1 9 9 5 , ▁p .   6