▁who ▁would ▁use ▁what ▁he ▁considered ▁to ▁be ▁' f asc ist ' ▁means ▁( techn ocr atic ▁author itar ian ism ▁and ▁force ) ▁to ▁achieve ▁a ▁liberal ▁social ▁end . ▁In ▁contrast , ▁a ▁' li ber al ▁fasc ist ' ▁would ▁purs ue ▁fasc ist ▁ends ▁but ▁in ▁a ▁' li ber al ' ▁or ▁at ▁least ▁more ▁' li ber al ' ▁way . ▁ ▁Austin ▁W . ▁Br am well ▁wrote ▁in ▁The ▁American ▁Conserv ative : ▁ ▁Re pe ated ly , ▁Gold berg ▁fails ▁to ▁recognize ▁a ▁re duct io ▁ad ▁abs urd um . ▁... ▁In ▁no ▁case ▁does ▁Gold berg ▁un cover ▁anything ▁more ▁o min ous ▁than ▁a ▁coinc idence . ▁... ▁In ▁elabor ating ▁liberal ism ' s ▁similar ities ▁to ▁fasc ism , ▁Gold berg ▁shows ▁a ▁near ▁super st it ious ▁belief ▁in ▁the ▁power ▁of ▁tax onomy . ▁... ▁Gold berg ▁f als ely ▁s add les ▁liberal ism ▁not ▁just ▁with ▁relativ ism ▁but ▁with ▁all ▁manner ▁of ▁alleg ed ▁errors ▁having ▁nothing ▁to ▁do ▁with ▁liberal ism . ▁... ▁Not ▁only ▁does ▁Gold berg ▁misunder stand ▁liberal ism , ▁but ▁he ▁ref uses ▁to ▁see ▁it ▁simply ▁as ▁liberal ism ▁... ▁Liberal ▁F asc ism ▁reads ▁less ▁like ▁an ▁extended ▁argument ▁than ▁as ▁a ▁catalog ue ▁of ▁conserv ative ▁intellectual ▁cl ich és , ▁often ▁irrelevant ▁to ▁the ▁supposed ▁point ▁of ▁the ▁book . ▁... ▁Liberal ▁F asc ism ▁comple tes ▁Gold berg ' s ▁transformation ▁from