▁Pol lock ▁and ▁Hud dl eston ▁BB ., ▁Stephen , ▁Man ist y , ▁Mat hew , ▁A ▁L ▁Smith , ▁Will s ▁and ▁Gran th am ▁J J ., ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁conduct ▁of ▁the ▁prisoner ▁did ▁not ▁amount ▁to ▁an ▁off ence ▁under ▁either ▁section ▁ 2 0 ▁or ▁section ▁ 4 7 . ▁Field , ▁Haw kins , ▁Day ▁and ▁Charles ▁J J . ▁diss ented . ▁ ▁Will s ▁J . ▁said ▁" the ▁facts ▁are ▁... ▁that ▁he ▁inf ected ▁her , ▁and ▁that ▁from ▁such ▁in fection ▁she ▁suffered ▁gr iev ous ▁bod ily ▁harm ". ▁ ▁Haw kins ▁J . ▁said : ▁ ▁Field ▁J . ▁said ▁( a ▁foot note ▁has ▁been ▁included ▁in ▁the ▁body ▁of ▁the ▁text , ▁indicated ▁by ▁"( 1 )" ): ▁ ▁Un cons cious ness ▁ ▁See ▁T ▁v . ▁D PP ▁[ 2 0 0 3 ] ▁E W HC ▁ 2 6 6 ▁( Admin ), ▁[ 2 0 0 3 ] ▁C rim ▁L R ▁ 6 2 2 . ▁ ▁H air ▁ ▁See ▁D PP ▁v . ▁Smith ▁[ 2 0 0 6 ] ▁E W HC ▁ 9 4 ▁( Admin ) ▁ ▁P ain ▁or ▁hurt ▁such ▁as ▁pers isting ▁head aches , ▁vom iting , ▁p ains ▁in ▁joint s , ▁st om ach ▁ach es ▁not ▁caused ▁by ▁physical ▁tra uma ▁ ▁M ention ed ▁in ▁R ▁v . ▁Morris ▁( C lar ence ▁Bar r ington ) ▁[ 1