▁wife ▁that ▁he ▁rep udi ates ▁her . ▁Class ical ▁jur ists ▁various ly ▁class ified ▁pron oun cement ▁of ▁t ala q ▁as ▁forb idden ▁or ▁repre hens ible ▁unless ▁it ▁was ▁motiv ated ▁by ▁a ▁comp elling ▁cause ▁such ▁as ▁impos s ibility ▁of ▁coh ab itation ▁due ▁to ▁irre con cil able ▁conflict , ▁though ▁they ▁did ▁not ▁require ▁the ▁husband ▁to ▁obtain ▁court ▁appro val ▁or ▁provide ▁a ▁just ification . ▁The ▁jur ists ▁im posed ▁certain ▁restrictions ▁on ▁valid ▁rep udi ation . ▁For ▁example , ▁the ▁declaration ▁must ▁be ▁made ▁in ▁clear ▁terms ; ▁the ▁husband ▁must ▁be ▁of ▁sound ▁mind ▁and ▁not ▁co er ced . ▁Upon ▁t ala q , ▁the ▁wife ▁is ▁entitled ▁to ▁the ▁full ▁payment ▁of ▁ma hr ▁if ▁it ▁had ▁not ▁already ▁been ▁paid . ▁The ▁husband ▁is ▁oblig ated ▁to ▁finan cially ▁support ▁her ▁until ▁the ▁end ▁of ▁the ▁waiting ▁period ▁or ▁the ▁delivery ▁of ▁her ▁child , ▁if ▁she ▁is ▁pre gn ant . ▁In ▁addition , ▁she ▁has ▁a ▁right ▁to ▁child ▁support ▁and ▁any ▁past ▁due ▁maintenance , ▁which ▁Islam ic ▁law ▁requires ▁to ▁be ▁paid ▁regularly ▁in ▁the ▁course ▁of ▁marriage . ▁ ▁G iving ▁the ▁husband ▁a ▁pr er og ative ▁of ▁rep udi ation ▁was ▁based ▁on ▁the ▁assumption ▁that ▁men ▁would ▁have ▁no ▁interest ▁in ▁initi ating ▁a ▁divor ce ▁without ▁good ▁cause , ▁given ▁the ▁financial ▁oblig ations ▁it ▁would ▁in cur . ▁Additionally , ▁classical ▁jur ists ▁were ▁of ▁the ▁opinion