▁Rom al pa ▁Al umin ium ▁Ltd ▁[ 1 9 7 6 ] ▁ 1 ▁W LR ▁ 6 7 6 ▁in ▁relation ▁to ▁ret ention ▁of ▁title , ▁and ▁the ▁decision ▁in ▁Re ▁Halle tt ' s ▁Est ate ▁( 1 8 8 0 ) ▁ 1 3 ▁Ch ▁D ▁ 6 9 6 ▁in ▁relation ▁to ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁trace . ▁ ▁He ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁process ▁of ▁working ▁the ▁res in ▁destroyed ▁that ▁product , ▁and ▁the ▁title ▁of ▁any ▁person ▁which ▁was ▁v ested ▁in ▁it . ▁ ▁According ly , ▁the ▁title ▁which ▁was ▁retained ▁under ▁the ▁agreement ▁was ▁ex ting u ished . ▁ ▁He ▁went ▁on ▁to ▁elaborate : ▁ ▁Buck ley ▁L J ▁and ▁Temple man ▁L J ▁gave ▁short ▁conc urr ing ▁jud g ments . ▁They ▁added ▁in ▁their ▁judgment ▁that ▁acqu iring ▁title ▁in ▁the ▁worked ▁product ▁would ▁generally ▁result ▁in ▁the ▁interest ▁being ▁treated ▁as ▁an ▁equ itable ▁charge , ▁which ▁would ▁be ▁void ▁if ▁not ▁properly ▁registered ▁under ▁the ▁Comp an ies ▁Act ▁ 1 9 4 8 ▁( now ▁the ▁Comp an ies ▁Act ▁ 2 0 0 6 ). ▁ ▁Author ity ▁ ▁The ▁case ▁is ▁still ▁accepted ▁as ▁author itative ▁today . ▁ ▁Foot notes ▁ ▁Category : Un ited ▁Kingdom ▁ins ol ven cy ▁case ▁law ▁Category : 1 9 8 1 ▁in ▁British ▁law ▁Category : 1 9 8 1 ▁in ▁case ▁law <0x0A> </s> ▁Pet ru ▁Vladimir ▁B ă lan ▁( born ▁ 1