▁Ci oc ules cu ▁took ▁over ▁the ▁A dev ăr ul ▁literary ▁column . ▁That ▁same ▁year , ▁A dev ăr ul ▁hosted ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁dispute ▁between ▁Ci oc ules cu ▁and ▁another ▁prominent ▁critic ▁of ▁the ▁period , ▁Per p ess ici us , ▁the ▁former ▁of ▁whom ▁accused ▁the ▁latter ▁of ▁being ▁too ▁ec lect ic ▁and ▁gener ous . ▁In ▁ 1 9 3 1 , ▁it ▁circul ated ▁young ▁critic ▁Luci an ▁Bo z ' s ▁defense ▁of ▁T z ara ▁and ▁pra ise ▁for ▁sculpt or ▁Constantin ▁Br ân cu și , ▁both ▁of ▁whom , ▁he ▁str essed , ▁had ▁brought ▁" f resh ▁Roman ian ▁air ▁into ▁the ▁real m ▁of ▁Western ▁culture ". ▁By ▁ 1 9 3 2 , ▁it ▁was ▁hosting ▁contributions ▁from ▁George ▁C ă lines cu , ▁including ▁one ▁which ▁critic ized ▁his ▁former ▁dis ci ple ▁Bo z , ▁and ▁ex cer pts ▁from ▁Lov ines cu ' s ▁mem oir s . ▁In ▁ 1 9 3 7 , ▁A dev ăr ul ▁hosted ▁a ▁po lem ic ▁between ▁Lov ines cu ▁and ▁his ▁dis ci ple ▁Felix ▁A der ca , ▁where ▁the ▁topic ▁was ▁avant - gar de ▁hero ▁U rm uz , ▁and ▁a ▁special ▁column ▁for ▁women ▁in ▁culture . ▁Probably ▁conce ived ▁by ▁femin ist ▁writer ▁Iz abel a ▁S ado ve anu - E van ▁( al ready ▁known ▁to ▁A dev ăr ul ▁readers ▁as ▁a ▁popular izer ▁of ▁English ▁literature