▁Saturday ▁Review ▁that ▁the ▁writers ▁were ▁introduced ▁as ▁" br illiant ▁and ▁icon oc last ic " ▁on ▁the ▁jack et ▁of ▁the ▁book , ▁but ▁thought ▁that ▁none ▁of ▁them ▁" st rik es ▁one ▁as ▁really ▁' br illiant ' ▁( T yn an ▁is ▁fun ny ▁enough ▁by ▁fits ▁and ▁starts ▁and ▁Os bor ne ▁vig or ously ▁direct , ▁but ▁the ▁rest ▁are ▁merely ▁earnest ▁and ▁op aque ), ▁while ▁their ▁' icon oc las m ' ▁consists ▁of ▁nothing ▁more ▁shock ing ▁than ▁compla ints ▁against ▁b ureau c racy , ▁the ▁mon archy , ▁and ▁H - b omb ▁tests , ▁ek ed ▁out ▁with ▁attacks ▁on ▁each ▁other ." ▁Conc ern ing ▁the ▁" ang ry ▁young ▁men " ▁label , ▁F ied ler ▁went ▁on ▁to ▁question ▁Less ing ' s ▁youth , ▁the ▁source ▁of ▁Os bor ne ' s ▁anger , ▁and ▁all ▁the ▁writers ' ▁decision ▁to ▁contribute ▁to ▁the ▁anth ology ; ▁Kings ley ▁Am is ▁had ▁been ▁asked ▁to ▁particip ate ▁but ▁decl ined , ▁which ▁F ied ler ▁comm ended . ▁F ied ler ▁continued : ▁Despite ▁Mr . ▁Os bor ne ' s ▁protest ▁that ▁he ▁is ▁not ▁the ▁protagon ist ▁of ▁Look ▁Back ▁in ▁An ger ▁and ▁the ▁des perate ▁ple a ▁of ▁all ▁the ▁accused ▁that ▁they ▁are ▁not ▁Am is ' s ▁L ucky ▁Jim , ▁it ▁is ▁evident ▁that ▁they ▁write ▁the ▁same ▁dialog ue ▁for ▁themselves ▁as ▁for ▁their ▁characters . ▁For ▁such