▁to ▁Mr . ▁Grant , ▁asked ▁him ▁what ▁was ▁going ▁on ▁and ▁asked ▁him ▁for ▁his ▁name ▁and ▁address . ▁Mr . ▁Grant ▁handed ▁over ▁his ▁identification ▁and ▁continued ▁acting ▁nerv ously . ▁He ▁went ▁to ▁adjust ▁his ▁jack et , ▁prompt ing ▁the ▁officer ▁to ▁ask ▁Mr . ▁Grant ▁to ▁keep ▁his ▁hands ▁in ▁front ▁of ▁him . ▁Wor ried ▁about ▁the ▁safety ▁of ▁the ▁first ▁officer , ▁the ▁other ▁two ▁officers ▁arrived , ▁identified ▁themselves , ▁and ▁ob struct ed ▁Mr . ▁Grant ' s ▁ability ▁to ▁continue ▁walking ▁forward . ▁A ▁conversation ▁took ▁place ▁with ▁Mr . ▁Grant , ▁at ▁which ▁point ▁he ▁ad vised ▁police ▁he ▁had ▁mar iju ana ▁and ▁a ▁fire arm ▁on ▁him . ▁Mr . ▁Grant ▁was ▁arrested , ▁and ▁the ▁mar iju ana ▁and ▁a ▁loaded ▁revol ver ▁were ▁seized . ▁Mr . ▁Grant ▁was ▁never ▁informed ▁of ▁his ▁right ▁to ▁speak ▁to ▁a ▁lawyer ▁prior ▁to ▁being ▁arrested . ▁ ▁The ▁trial ▁judge ▁found ▁that ▁Mr . ▁Grant ▁was ▁not ▁det ained ▁before ▁his ▁arrest , ▁and ▁that ▁section ▁ 9 ▁and ▁section ▁ 1 0 ▁of ▁the ▁Char ter ▁were ▁not ▁in fr ing ed . ▁The ▁gun ▁was ▁admitted ▁into ▁evidence , ▁and ▁Mr . ▁Grant ▁was ▁conv icted ▁of ▁a ▁number ▁of ▁fire arm ▁off ences , ▁including ▁transfer ring ▁a ▁fire arm ▁without ▁law ful ▁authority ▁( section ▁ 1 0 0 ( 1 ) ▁of ▁the ▁C riminal ▁Code ). ▁ ▁On ▁appeal , ▁the ▁Court ▁of ▁App