▁the ▁ordinary ▁inc idents ▁of ▁a ▁treat y ▁is ▁the ▁c ession ▁of ▁territory , ▁and ▁that ▁the ▁territory ▁thus ▁acquired ▁is ▁acquired ▁as ▁absolutely ▁as ▁if ▁the ▁an nex ation ▁were ▁made , ▁as ▁in ▁the ▁case ▁of ▁Texas ▁and ▁Hawai i , ▁by ▁an ▁act ▁of ▁Congress ." ▁ ▁Hawai i ▁v . ▁M ank ichi ▁ ▁In ▁a ▁ 1 9 0 3 ▁criminal ▁case , ▁Territ ory ▁of ▁Hawai i ▁v . ▁M ank ichi ' ', ▁ 1 9 0 ▁U . S . ▁ 1 9 7 ▁( 1 9 0 3 ) ▁the ▁U . S . ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁noted ▁that ▁" the ▁status ▁of ▁the ▁islands ▁and ▁the ▁powers ▁of ▁their ▁prov is ional ▁government ▁were ▁measured ▁by ▁the ▁New lands ▁resolution [ ." ▁That ▁point ▁was ▁made ▁even ▁more ▁force fully ▁in ▁a ▁separate ▁opinion ▁in ▁the ▁case ▁file d ▁by ▁Justice ▁Har lan . ▁Justice ▁Har lan ▁disag re ed ▁with ▁the ▁court ▁on ▁a ▁different ▁issue ▁which ▁concerned ▁Hawai ian ▁law ▁as ▁to ▁j ury ▁tri als , ▁but ▁on ▁the ▁issue ▁of ▁the ▁valid ity ▁of ▁the ▁New lands ▁resolution , ▁he ▁agreed ▁fully ▁with ▁the ▁majority , ▁stating , ▁" By ▁the ▁resolution , ▁the ▁an nex ation ▁of ▁the ▁Hawai ian ▁Islands ▁became ▁complete , ▁and ▁the ▁object ▁of ▁the ▁proposed ▁treat y , ▁that ▁' th ose ▁islands ▁should ▁be ▁incorpor ated ▁into ▁the ▁United ▁States ▁as ▁an ▁integral ▁part ▁there of , ▁and ▁under ▁its ▁so vere