▁dismiss ed ▁the ▁case ▁in ▁ 2 0 1 0 . ▁ ▁He ▁similarly ▁came ▁under ▁scr ut iny ▁after ▁declaring ▁a ▁ 2 0 0 8 ▁tax able ▁income ▁of ▁ 6 7 0 , 0 0 0 ▁pes os ▁( around ▁US $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 ) ▁against ▁ 7 0 ▁million ▁pes os ▁in ▁exem ptions , ▁ 3 0 ▁million ▁in ▁inter ▁viv os ▁g ifts ▁to ▁his ▁children , ▁and ▁another ▁ 3 0 ▁million ▁in ▁personal ▁exp enses . ▁According ly , ▁his ▁tax ▁li ability ▁was ▁estimated ▁to ▁be ▁at ▁least ▁ 1 0 0 ▁times ▁what ▁he ▁actually ▁paid , ▁and ▁in ▁ 2 0 1 0 ▁a ▁tax ▁li en ▁was ▁placed ▁on ▁his ▁assets ▁for ▁ 8 7 ▁million ▁pes os ▁( US $ 2 2 ▁million ▁at ▁the ▁time ). ▁Another ▁significant ▁case ▁– ▁failure ▁on ▁the ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁La ▁R ural - O g den ▁group ▁( of ▁which ▁de ▁Nar vá ez ▁is ▁a ▁partner ) ▁to ▁rep ay ▁a ▁US $ 1 0 6 ▁million ▁loan ▁from ▁the ▁Bank ▁of ▁the ▁Province ▁of ▁Buenos ▁Aires ▁– ▁exp ired ▁via ▁stat ute ▁of ▁limitations ▁in ▁ 2 0 1 3 . ▁ ▁Santa ▁Cruz ▁property ▁case ▁( 2 0 1 1 ) ▁One ▁of ▁the ▁Wik ile aks ▁c ables ▁mentions ▁an ▁investigation ▁of ▁members ▁of ▁the ▁Kirch ner ▁administration ▁and ▁its ▁business ▁al lies ▁in ▁Santa ▁Cruz ▁province . ▁The ▁investigation ▁focused ▁on ▁the