▁is ▁intended ▁to ▁serve . ▁If ▁the ▁program ▁theory ▁fails ▁to ▁address ▁the ▁needs ▁of ▁the ▁target ▁population ▁it ▁will ▁be ▁rendered ▁in effect ive ▁even ▁when ▁if ▁it ▁is ▁well ▁implemented . ▁ ▁Ass ess ment ▁of ▁logic ▁and ▁pla us ibility ▁This ▁form ▁of ▁assess ment ▁ ▁involves ▁asking ▁a ▁panel ▁of ▁expert ▁review ers ▁to ▁crit ically ▁review ▁the ▁logic ▁and ▁pla us ibility ▁of ▁the ▁assumptions ▁and ▁expect ations ▁inher ent ▁in ▁the ▁program ' s ▁design . ▁The ▁review ▁process ▁is ▁un struct ured ▁and ▁open ▁ended ▁so ▁as ▁to ▁address ▁certain ▁issues ▁on ▁the ▁program ▁design . ▁R ut man ▁( 1 9 8 0 ), ▁Smith ▁( 1 9 8 9 ), ▁and ▁Wh olly ▁( 1 9 9 4 ) ▁suggested ▁the ▁questions ▁listed ▁below ▁to ▁assist ▁with ▁the ▁review ▁process . ▁Are ▁the ▁program ▁goals ▁and ▁object ives ▁well ▁defined ? ▁Are ▁the ▁program ▁goals ▁and ▁object ives ▁feas ible ? ▁Is ▁the ▁change ▁process ▁pres umed ▁in ▁the ▁program ▁theory ▁feas ible ? ▁Are ▁the ▁procedures ▁for ▁ident ifying ▁members ▁of ▁the ▁target ▁population , ▁deliver ing ▁service ▁to ▁them , ▁and ▁sust aining ▁that ▁service ▁through ▁completion ▁well ▁defined ▁and ▁suff i ient ? ▁Are ▁the ▁constitu ent ▁components , ▁activities , ▁and ▁functions ▁of ▁the ▁program ▁well ▁defined ▁and ▁sufficient ? ▁Are ▁the ▁resources ▁allocated ▁to ▁the ▁program ▁and ▁its ▁various ▁activities ▁ade qu ate ? ▁▁ ▁Ass ess ment ▁through ▁comparison ▁with ▁research ▁and ▁practice ▁ ▁This ▁form ▁of ▁assess