▁to ▁search ▁without ▁war r ants . ▁After ▁several ▁meet ings ▁with ▁the ▁F BI , ▁they ▁provided ▁a ▁new ▁red act ed ▁version ▁of ▁the ▁F BI ▁Mo ble y ▁Inter view . ▁McC lan ah an ▁became ▁concerned ▁that ▁the ▁F BI ▁was ▁tap ing ▁his ▁email ▁and ▁inter fer ing ▁with ▁his ▁internet ▁connection , ▁after ▁the ▁agents ▁had ▁requested ▁specific ▁information ▁about ▁his ▁Internet ▁Service ▁Pro vider ▁and ▁details ▁about ▁his ▁email ▁account . ▁Under ▁the ▁Electron ic ▁Communic ations ▁Priv acy ▁Act , ▁the ▁F BI ▁does ▁not ▁require ▁a ▁court ▁order ▁to ▁obtain ▁emails ▁from ▁an ▁Internet ▁provider ▁that ▁are ▁older ▁than ▁ 1 8 0 ▁days ▁and ▁McC lan ah an ▁sus pected ▁that ▁the ▁F BI ▁had ▁issued ▁an ▁administrative ▁sub po ena ▁for ▁his ▁emails . ▁ ▁During ▁a ▁February ▁ 8 , ▁ 2 0 1 3 ▁meeting ▁a ▁government ▁pro sec utor ▁told ▁McC lan ah an ▁that ▁neither ▁he ▁nor ▁the ▁National ▁Security ▁Coun sel ors ▁group ▁were ▁the ▁target ▁of ▁any ▁on going ▁investig ations ▁but ▁McC lan ah an ▁remained ▁un con vin ced ▁and ▁file d ▁his ▁own ▁FO IA ▁request ▁seeking ▁information ▁about ▁the ▁F BI ▁Mo ble y ▁Inter view ▁document ▁and ▁related ▁investig ations . ▁As ▁of ▁March ▁ 2 5 , ▁ 2 0 1 4 ▁all ▁of ▁these ▁requests ▁have ▁been ▁denied ▁on ▁the ▁grounds ▁that ▁they ▁would ▁inter f ere ▁with ▁an ▁on going ▁investigation . ▁ ▁See ▁also ▁Hom eg rown