▁of ▁hyper py ra emia ▁because ▁it ▁was ▁not ▁clearly ▁defined ▁and ▁H are ▁provided ▁no ▁direct ▁evidence ▁for ▁its ▁existence . ▁ ▁In ▁ 1 9 0 6 , ▁a ▁review ▁in ▁the ▁British ▁Medical ▁Journal ▁concluded ▁that ▁" we ▁cannot ▁regard ▁the ▁theory ▁of ▁hyper py ra emia ▁as ▁possess ing ▁any ▁sound ▁basis , ▁nor ▁can ▁the ▁author ▁expect ▁it ▁to ▁be ▁considered ▁seriously ▁until ▁he ▁has ▁given ▁a ▁clearer ▁definition ▁of ▁what ▁he ▁means ▁by ▁excess ▁of ▁fuel ▁subst ances ▁in ▁the ▁blood , ▁and ▁has ▁produced ▁some ▁direct ▁evidence ▁of ▁their ▁presence ." ▁H are ' s ▁book ▁was ▁critic ized ▁in ▁the ▁Edinburgh ▁Medical ▁Journal . ▁The ▁rev iewer ▁noted ▁that ▁hyper py ra emia ▁has ▁no ▁chemical ▁basis ▁or ▁evidence ▁to ▁support ▁it ▁and ▁that ▁he ▁did ▁not ▁have ▁a ▁proper ▁theory , ▁only ▁an ▁assumption . ▁A ▁mixed - review ▁in ▁the ▁Br istol ▁Med ico - Ch ir urg ical ▁Journal ▁concluded ▁that ▁" the ▁work ▁is ▁one ▁of ▁very ▁great ▁interest , ▁and ▁contains ▁much ▁that ▁is ▁original ▁in ▁thought , ▁although ▁some ▁of ▁the ▁hypoth eses ▁prove ▁un ten able ." ▁ ▁H are ' s ▁views ▁were ▁not ▁accepted ▁by ▁the ▁medical ▁community ▁but ▁his ▁book ▁influenced ▁those ▁in ▁the ▁field ▁of ▁clin ical ▁e col ogy . ▁ ▁Selected ▁publications ▁ ▁The ▁Food ▁F actor ▁in ▁Ast h ma : ▁Hyper py ra emia ▁( 1 9 0 5 ) ▁The ▁Food ▁F actor ▁in ▁D ise ase ▁( two