▁but ▁issued ▁no ▁ind ict ments . ▁ ▁Jones ▁file d ▁a ▁civil ▁suit ▁against ▁K BR ▁and ▁one ▁of ▁its ▁former ▁employees . ▁The ▁j ury ▁returned ▁a ▁ver dict ▁in ▁favor ▁of ▁the ▁defend ants , ▁finding ▁that ▁the ▁sex ▁between ▁Jones ▁and ▁the ▁employee ▁was ▁cons ens ual , ▁and ▁that ▁therefore ▁no ▁ra pe ▁had ▁occurred , ▁and ▁that ▁K BR ▁did ▁not ▁def ra ud ▁her . ▁Her ▁case ▁was ▁one ▁of ▁those ▁show c ased ▁in ▁the ▁H BO ▁document ary ▁Hot ▁C off ee ▁to ▁show ▁how ▁mand atory ▁arbitr ation ▁from ▁an ▁employee ▁contract ▁restrict s ▁access ▁to ▁court ▁systems , ▁even ▁in ▁criminal ▁cases . ▁ ▁Jones ' s ▁alleg ations ▁ ▁Jones ▁began ▁working ▁for ▁K BR ▁as ▁an ▁administrative ▁assistant ▁when ▁she ▁was ▁ 1 9 ▁and ▁started ▁working ▁in ▁Ira q ▁on ▁July ▁ 2 4 , ▁ 2 0 0 5 . ▁ ▁According ▁to ▁Jones , ▁on ▁July ▁ 2 8 , ▁ 2 0 0 5 , ▁one ▁of ▁her ▁fellow ▁K BR ▁employees ▁offered ▁her ▁a ▁drink ▁containing ▁a ▁date ▁ra pe ▁drug , ▁although ▁a ▁subsequent ▁blood ▁test ▁did ▁not ▁detect ▁any ▁date ▁ra pe ▁dru gs . ▁Jones ▁says ▁that ▁while ▁she ▁was ▁un cons cious , ▁several ▁men ▁an ally ▁and ▁v agin ally ▁gang ▁ra ped ▁her . ▁She ▁reported ▁that ▁when ▁she ▁a wo ke ▁the ▁next ▁morning , ▁she ▁" found ▁her ▁body ▁n aked ▁and ▁sever ely ▁bru ised ,