▁not ▁have ▁been ▁visible ▁or ▁regarded ▁as ▁leg ally ▁significant ▁in ▁the ▁era ▁when ▁parliament ary ▁legisl ation ▁could ▁not ▁be ▁challeng ed , ▁but ▁which ▁would ▁become ▁gl aring ly ▁obvious ▁in ▁the ▁age ▁of ▁constitution al ▁rights . ▁The ▁requirement ▁of ▁reading ▁down ▁would ▁not ▁be ▁an ▁author isation ▁for ▁reading ▁in . ▁ ▁See ▁also ▁▁ ▁Civil ▁procedure ▁in ▁South ▁Africa ▁ ▁Law ▁of ▁South ▁Africa ▁ ▁References ▁ ▁C ases ▁▁ ▁African ▁Real ty ▁Trust ▁v ▁Sh erman ▁ 1 9 0 7 ▁TH ▁ 3 4 . ▁ ▁Board ▁of ▁Reg ents ▁of ▁State ▁Colleg es ▁v ▁Roth ▁ 4 0 8 ▁US ▁ 5 6 4 ▁( 1 9 7 2 ). ▁ ▁City ▁of ▁Mobile , ▁Alabama ▁v ▁B old en ▁ 4 4 6 ▁US ▁ 5 5 ▁( 1 9 8 0 ). ▁ ▁Co et ze e ▁v ▁Government ▁of ▁the ▁Republic ▁of ▁South ▁Africa ; ▁Mat iso ▁and ▁O thers ▁v ▁Command ing ▁Officer , ▁Port ▁Elizabeth ▁Pr ison , ▁and ▁O thers ▁ 1 9 9 5 ▁( 4 ) ▁SA ▁ 6 3 1 ▁( CC ). ▁ ▁Ed mont on ▁Journal ▁v ▁Al berta ▁AG ▁( 1 9 8 9 ) ▁ 4 5 ▁CR R ▁ 1 . ▁ ▁Er as mus ▁v ▁Th y ss en ▁ 1 9 9 4 ▁( 3 ) ▁SA ▁ 7 9 7 ▁( C ). ▁ ▁H icks ▁v ▁Fe io ck ▁ 4 8 5 ▁US ▁ 6 2