▁claimed ▁as ▁illegal . ▁ ▁On ▁ 2 9 ▁May ▁ 2 0 0 7 , ▁the ▁new ▁man aging ▁partner ▁stated ▁under ▁o ath ▁- ▁without ▁further ▁evidence ▁- ▁that ▁the ▁open - source ▁Am iga OS ▁re implementation ▁A RO S ▁was ▁" pro bably ▁illegal ", ▁as ▁documented ▁on ▁page ▁ 2 7 ▁of ▁court ▁documents ▁related ▁to ▁the ▁Am iga - Hy per ion ▁court ▁case . ▁ ▁On ▁ 3 0 ▁September ▁ 2 0 0 9 , ▁Hyper ion ▁and ▁Am iga , ▁Inc ▁reached ▁a ▁settlement . ▁Hyper ion ▁was ▁granted ▁an ▁exclusive ▁license ▁to ▁develop ▁and ▁market ▁Am iga OS ▁ 4 ▁and ▁subsequent ▁versions ▁with ▁the ▁name ▁Am iga OS . ▁However , ▁the ▁" Am iga " ▁tra dem ark ▁remained ▁with ▁Am iga , ▁Inc . ▁and ▁was ▁then ▁also ▁lic ensed ▁to ▁other ▁parties , ▁including ▁Com mod ore ▁USA ▁and ▁i Cont ain . ▁This ▁meant ▁that ▁" Am iga " ▁brand ed ▁hardware ▁could ▁and ▁would ▁be ▁sold ▁without ▁Am iga OS ▁ 4 . ▁ ▁In ▁ 2 0 0 9 , ▁Hyper ion ▁changed ▁its ▁legal ▁status ▁from ▁a ▁business ▁partners hip ▁( V OF ) ▁to ▁a ▁company ▁with ▁limited ▁li ability ▁( CV BA ). ▁ ▁On ▁ 2 4 ▁April ▁ 2 0 1 1 , ▁E vert ▁Cart on ▁announced ▁he ▁was ▁ste pping ▁down ▁as ▁the ▁man aging ▁partner ▁of ▁Hyper ion . ▁In ▁charge ▁of ▁the ▁company ▁were ▁then ▁Ben ▁Herm