▁that ▁the ▁Glo be ▁put ▁into ▁it . ▁Indeed , ▁the ▁Court ▁found ▁that ▁the ▁CD - ROM ▁database ▁did ▁not ▁viol ate ▁the ▁author ' s ▁copy right ▁as ▁it ▁presented ▁articles ▁related ▁to ▁that ▁day ' s ▁paper ▁when ▁a ▁user ▁viewed ▁a ▁particular ▁article . ▁ ▁Though ▁the ▁layout ▁was ▁different , ▁the ▁Court ▁reason ed ▁that ▁the ▁ess ence ▁of ▁the ▁collection ▁remained . ▁ ▁Over all , ▁the ▁Court ▁ruled ▁that ▁Robert son ' s ▁rights ▁had ▁been ▁viol ated ▁by ▁the ▁addition ▁of ▁her ▁works ▁into ▁two ▁of ▁the ▁three ▁databases . ▁ ▁Second ary ▁Iss ues ▁After ▁determ ining ▁that ▁Robert son ▁could ▁claim ▁copy right ▁in fr ing ement ▁for ▁the ▁inclusion ▁of ▁her ▁articles ▁in ▁two ▁of ▁the ▁databases , ▁the ▁court ▁then ▁turned ▁to ▁the ▁secondary ▁issues , ▁and ▁ruled ▁that : ▁▁▁ ▁Only ▁an ▁exclusive ▁license ▁needed ▁to ▁be ▁in ▁writing . ▁ ▁A ▁grant ▁of ▁a ▁non - ex clus ive ▁license ▁does ▁not ▁need ▁to ▁be ▁in ▁writing ▁to ▁be ▁en force able . ▁ ▁Emp loy ees ▁of ▁The ▁Glo be ▁and ▁Mail ▁should ▁not ▁have ▁been ▁cert ified ▁as ▁members ▁of ▁the ▁class . ▁ ▁The ▁employees ▁retained ▁no ▁rights ▁in ▁the ▁works ▁when ▁the ▁works ▁were ▁produced ▁in ▁accord ance ▁with ▁their ▁employ ment ▁agre ements . ▁ ▁Given ▁the ▁previous ▁finding ▁that ▁two ▁of ▁the ▁databases ▁did ▁not ▁substantial ly ▁reproduce ▁the ▁newsp apers ▁as ▁they ▁were ▁in ▁the ▁print ▁edition , ▁it ▁was ▁found ▁that