▁Crit ic ism ▁ ▁Many ▁dem ocr atic ▁and ▁libert arian ▁social ists , ▁including ▁an arch ists , ▁mut ual ists ▁and ▁synd ical ists , ▁critic ize ▁state ▁social ism ▁for ▁advoc ating ▁a ▁workers ' ▁state ▁instead ▁of ▁abol ishing ▁the ▁b our ge ois ▁state ▁appar atus ▁out right . ▁They ▁use ▁the ▁term ▁state ▁social ism ▁in ▁contrast ▁with ▁their ▁own ▁form ▁of ▁social ism ▁which ▁involves ▁either ▁collect ive ▁ownership ▁( in ▁the ▁form ▁of ▁worker ▁co oper atives ) ▁or ▁common ▁ownership ▁of ▁the ▁means ▁of ▁production ▁without ▁central ized ▁state ▁planning . ▁Those ▁libert arian ▁social ists ▁believe ▁there ▁is ▁no ▁need ▁for ▁a ▁state ▁in ▁a ▁social ist ▁system ▁because ▁there ▁would ▁be ▁no ▁class ▁to ▁suppress ▁and ▁no ▁need ▁for ▁an ▁institution ▁based ▁on ▁co erc ion ▁and ▁therefore ▁regard ▁the ▁state ▁being ▁a ▁rem nant ▁of ▁capital ism . ▁Most ▁hold ▁that ▁stat ism ▁is ▁itself ▁ant ith et ical ▁to ▁true ▁social ism , ▁the ▁goal ▁of ▁which ▁is ▁the ▁eyes ▁of ▁social ists ▁such ▁as ▁William ▁Morris , ▁who ▁wrote ▁as ▁follows ▁in ▁a ▁Common we al ▁article : ▁" State ▁Social ism ? ▁— ▁I ▁don ' t ▁agree ▁with ▁it ; ▁in ▁fact ▁I ▁think ▁the ▁two ▁words ▁contradict ▁one ▁another , ▁and ▁that ▁it ▁is ▁the ▁business ▁of ▁Social ism ▁to ▁destroy ▁the ▁State ▁and ▁put ▁Free ▁Society ▁in ▁its ▁place ". ▁ ▁Class ical ▁and ▁orth odox ▁Marx ists ▁also ▁view ▁state ▁social ism ▁as ▁an