▁that ▁he ▁had ▁worked ▁four ▁months ▁entirely ▁on ▁the ▁con cer to ▁and ▁" has ▁done ▁his ▁best ▁in ▁subm itting ▁a ▁work ▁for ▁which ▁he ▁makes ▁absolutely ▁no ▁ap ology ." ▁He ▁appe als ▁to ▁F els ' ▁" under standing ▁and ▁gener os ity " ▁that ▁he ▁be ▁allowed ▁to ▁keep ▁the ▁$ 5 0 0 ▁advance , ▁which ▁he ▁bel ieves ▁is ▁standard ▁practice ▁" when ▁a ▁commission ed ▁work ▁is ▁not ▁accepted ▁by ▁the ▁commission er ." ▁F els ▁does ▁say ▁in ▁his ▁December ▁ 1 5 ▁letter ▁to ▁Bar ber ▁that ▁the ▁matter ▁would ▁most ▁likely ▁be ▁settled ▁" s atisf actor ily " ▁for ▁both ▁parties . ▁▁ ▁Me iff ▁rep lies ▁on ▁December ▁ 2 6 ▁to ▁a ▁hand ▁written ▁note ▁from ▁F els ▁with ▁a ▁length y ▁two - page ▁letter ▁out lin ing ▁to ▁F els , ▁" point ▁by ▁point ," ▁the ▁many ▁reasons ▁why ▁the ▁piece ▁is ▁def ic ient — th us ▁ar ming ▁F els ▁with ▁the ▁information ▁he ▁needed ▁to ▁be ▁able ▁to ▁speak ▁intellig ently ▁to ▁Bar ber . ▁Me iff ▁explains : ▁it ▁" has n ' t ▁got ▁enough ▁back bone — not ▁strong , ▁not ▁maj estic — does ▁not ▁contain ▁enough ▁dram atic ▁moments , ▁all ▁of ▁which ▁make ▁for ▁a ▁successful ▁performance ." ▁He ▁says ▁it ▁is ▁not ▁a ▁piece ▁for ▁a ▁great ▁hall ▁with ▁a ▁huge ▁or chestra ▁"... like ▁placing ▁a ▁small ▁basket ▁of ▁d ain ty ▁flowers ▁among ▁tall ▁c