, ▁both ▁ab neg ated ▁the ▁throne ▁and ▁both ▁had ▁become ▁mon ks ▁and ▁Bud d ha ▁follow ers ▁soon ▁after ▁the ▁appearance ▁of ▁Bud d ha ' s ▁Law ▁and ▁Sang ha . ▁Since ▁according ▁to ▁P ali ▁text ual ▁evidence , ▁P uk k us ati ▁was ▁king ▁of ▁‘ G and h ara - K as mi ra ’ , ▁hence ▁his ▁contemporary ▁king ▁Mah a ▁K app h ina , ▁said ▁to ▁be ▁a ▁great ▁r uler ▁of ▁a ▁front ier ▁country ▁( h ence ▁also ▁from ▁U tt ar ap ath a ), ▁could ▁not ▁have ▁been ▁a ▁king ▁either ▁of ▁Gand h ara ▁or ▁of ▁Kas mi ra , ▁as ▁D . ▁D . ▁Kos amb i ▁spec ul ates . ▁This ▁clearly ▁means ▁that ▁Mah a ▁K app h ina ▁could ▁only ▁have ▁been ▁a ▁king ▁of ▁Kam bo ja ▁alone ▁( the ▁only ▁other ▁Mah aj an ap ada ▁or ▁great ▁country ▁located ▁in ▁the ▁U tt ar ap ath a ▁division ). ▁And ▁being ▁immediate ▁neighbor ▁to ▁Gand h ara , ▁king ▁Mah a ▁K app h ina ▁had ▁followed ▁king ▁P uk k us ati ▁or ▁vice ▁vers a ▁and ▁emb rac ed ▁the ▁Buddh ist ▁faith . ▁ ▁Con clusion ▁General ▁Alexander ▁C unning ham ▁has ▁identified ▁K uk k at av ati ▁kingdom ▁of ▁Mah a ▁K app h ina ▁with ▁Chinese ▁K ip in ▁(= P ā ṇ in ian ▁ ▁Kap isa ) ▁or ▁Greek ▁K oph ene ▁and