▁choice ▁but ▁to ▁comp ly . ▁ ▁In ▁cases ▁where ▁there ▁is ▁physical ▁rest raint ▁or ▁legal ▁oblig ation , ▁it ▁may ▁not ▁be ▁clear ▁whether ▁a ▁person ▁has ▁been ▁det ained . ▁To ▁determine ▁whether ▁a ▁reasonable ▁person ▁in ▁the ▁individual ' s ▁circumstances ▁would ▁conclude ▁that ▁the ▁state ▁had ▁dep riv ed ▁them ▁of ▁the ▁liberty ▁of ▁choice , ▁the ▁court ▁may ▁consider , ▁inter ▁al ia , ▁the ▁following ▁factors : ▁ ▁The ▁circumstances ▁giving ▁rise ▁to ▁the ▁encounter ▁as ▁would ▁reason ably ▁be ▁perce ived ▁by ▁the ▁individual : ▁whether ▁the ▁police ▁were ▁providing ▁general ▁assistance ; ▁maintain ing ▁general ▁order ; ▁making ▁general ▁in qui ries ▁regarding ▁a ▁particular ▁occurrence ; ▁or , ▁sing ling ▁out ▁the ▁individual ▁for ▁focused ▁investigation . ▁The ▁nature ▁of ▁the ▁police ▁conduct , ▁including ▁the ▁language ▁used ; ▁the ▁use ▁of ▁physical ▁contact ; ▁the ▁place ▁where ▁the ▁interaction ▁occurred ; ▁the ▁presence ▁of ▁others ; ▁and ▁the ▁duration ▁of ▁the ▁encounter . ▁The ▁particular ▁characteristics ▁or ▁circumstances ▁of ▁the ▁individual , ▁when ▁relevant , ▁including ▁age ; ▁physical ▁stat ure ; ▁minor ity ▁status ; ▁level ▁of ▁s oph istic ation . ▁ ▁The ▁majority ▁went ▁on ▁to ▁find ▁that ▁Mr . ▁Grant ▁was ▁psych olog ically ▁det ained ▁when ▁he ▁was ▁told ▁to ▁keep ▁his ▁hands ▁in ▁front ▁of ▁him ▁and ▁when ▁the ▁other ▁officers ▁moved ▁into ▁position ▁to ▁prevent ▁him ▁from ▁walking ▁forward . ▁Therefore , ▁ ▁he ▁was ▁arbitr arily ▁det ained ▁and ▁denied ▁his ▁right ▁to ▁coun