▁is ▁simply ▁a ▁criminal ▁because ▁he ▁is ▁a ▁criminal , ▁because ▁he ▁has ▁those ▁t ast es . ▁It ▁is ▁what ▁used ▁to ▁be ▁called ▁a ▁crime ▁of ▁opinion . ▁( ...) ▁The ▁crime ▁van ishes , ▁nobody ▁is ▁concerned ▁any ▁longer ▁to ▁know ▁whether ▁in ▁fact ▁a ▁crime ▁was ▁committed ▁or ▁not , ▁whether ▁someone ▁has ▁been ▁hurt ▁or ▁not . ▁No ▁one ▁is ▁even ▁concerned ▁any ▁more ▁whether ▁there ▁actually ▁was ▁a ▁victim ." ▁ ▁H oc qu eng hem ▁con cludes ▁that ▁the ▁crime ▁fe eds ▁upon ▁itself ▁in ▁a ▁man - h unt , ▁by ▁the ▁identification ▁and ▁isol ation ▁of ▁the ▁category ▁of ▁individuals ▁regarded ▁as ▁ped oph iles , ▁and ▁the ▁call ▁for ▁a ▁l yn ch ing ▁sent ▁out ▁by ▁the ▁" g utter ▁press ". ▁ ▁Jean ▁Dan et ▁adds ▁that ▁this ▁crime ▁without ▁violence ▁can ▁be ▁used ▁by ▁the ▁state ▁for ▁political ▁reasons , ▁against ▁" in con ven ient " ▁individuals : ▁" In c itement ▁of ▁a ▁minor ▁to ▁commit ▁an ▁imm oral ▁act , ▁for ▁example , ▁can ▁be ▁used ▁against ▁social ▁workers ▁and ▁teachers . ▁( ...) ▁In ▁ 1 9 7 6 ▁in ▁N antes , ▁a ▁teacher ▁was ▁tried ▁for ▁inc iting ▁min ors ▁to ▁imm oral ▁acts , ▁when ▁in ▁fact ▁what ▁he ▁had ▁done ▁was ▁to ▁supply ▁contra cept ives ▁to ▁the ▁boys ▁and ▁girls ▁in ▁his ▁charge ". ▁ ▁Dan et ▁predicted ▁that ▁a ▁new ▁form ▁of ▁social ▁control ▁would ▁replace ▁the ▁legal ▁one ,