▁and ▁Dynamic ▁Psych iat ry , ▁and ▁the ▁National ▁M emb ership ▁Committee ▁on ▁Ps y cho analysis ▁in ▁C lin ical ▁Social ▁Work . ▁ ▁Although ▁it ▁is ▁based ▁on ▁current ▁neu ros cience ▁and ▁treatment ▁outcome ▁studies , ▁Care y ▁( 2 0 0 6 ) ▁points ▁out ▁that ▁many ▁of ▁the ▁concepts ▁in ▁the ▁P DM ▁are ▁adapted ▁from ▁the ▁classical ▁ps y cho anal yt ic ▁tradition ▁of ▁psych other apy . ▁For ▁example , ▁the ▁P DM ▁indicates ▁that ▁the ▁anx iety ▁dis orders ▁may ▁be ▁trac ed ▁to ▁the ▁" four ▁basic ▁danger ▁situations " ▁described ▁by ▁Sig mund ▁Fre ud ▁( 1 9 2 6 ) ▁ ▁as ▁the ▁loss ▁of ▁a ▁significant ▁other ; ▁the ▁loss ▁of ▁love ; ▁the ▁loss ▁of ▁body ▁integrity ; ▁and ▁the ▁loss ▁of ▁aff irm ation ▁by ▁one ' s ▁own ▁conscience . ▁It ▁uses ▁a ▁new ▁perspective ▁on ▁the ▁existing ▁di agnostic ▁system ▁as ▁it ▁enables ▁clin icians ▁to ▁describe ▁and ▁categor ize ▁person ality ▁patterns , ▁related ▁social ▁and ▁emot ional ▁capac ities , ▁unique ▁mental ▁profiles , ▁and ▁personal ▁experiences ▁of ▁the ▁patient . ▁ ▁The ▁P DM ▁is ▁not ▁intended ▁to ▁comp ete ▁with ▁the ▁D SM ▁or ▁I CD . ▁The ▁authors ▁report ▁the ▁work ▁emphas izes ▁" ind ividual ▁variations ▁as ▁well ▁as ▁common al ities " ▁by ▁" f oc using ▁on ▁the ▁full ▁range ▁of ▁mental ▁function ing " ▁and ▁serves ▁as ▁a ▁"[ com plement ▁to ] ▁the ▁D SM