ied ▁in ▁the ▁Sex ▁Disc rim ination ▁and ▁other ▁Legisl ation ▁Am end ment ▁Act ▁ 1 9 9 2 ▁and / or ▁the ▁Law ▁and ▁Justice ▁Legisl ation ▁Am end ment ▁Act ▁ 1 9 9 3 ▁as ▁they ▁affect ▁the ▁Ra cial ▁Disc rim ination ▁Act ▁ 1 9 7 5 ▁are ▁any , ▁and ▁if ▁so ▁which , ▁of ▁the ▁prov isions ▁of ▁Part ▁III ▁of ▁the ▁Ra cial ▁Disc rim ination ▁Act ▁ 1 9 7 5 ▁invalid ?" ▁ ▁Jud gment ▁and ▁outcome ▁of ▁the ▁case ▁ ▁A ▁un anim ous ▁decision ▁was ▁returned ▁by ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁through ▁two ▁jud g ments , ▁one ▁by ▁Mason ▁C J , ▁B ren nan ▁and ▁To o he y ▁J J , ▁the ▁other ▁by ▁De ane , ▁Daw son , ▁Ga ud ron ▁and ▁Mc H ugh ▁J J . ▁The ▁court ▁found ▁that ▁sections ▁ 2 5 Z AB , ▁ 2 5 Z AC ▁and ▁ 2 5 Z C ▁of ▁the ▁R DA ▁which ▁had ▁been ▁implemented ▁by ▁the ▁two ▁prior ▁mentioned ▁am end ments ▁were ▁invalid . ▁De ane , ▁Daw son , ▁Ga ud ron ▁and ▁Mc H ugh ▁J J ▁also ▁declared ▁section ▁ 2 5 Z AA ▁to ▁be ▁invalid . ▁The ▁other ▁jud ges ▁did ▁not ▁consider ▁this ▁issue . ▁ ▁This ▁decision ▁was ▁form ulated ▁from ▁the ▁consideration ▁of ▁the ▁definition ▁of ▁jud icial ▁power , ▁the ▁starting ▁point ▁of ▁which ▁was ▁noted ▁to ▁be ▁the ▁judgment ▁of ▁Griff