▁was ▁" inde cent ▁but ▁not ▁obsc ene ". ▁The ▁Court ▁recognized ▁the ▁government ▁had ▁strong ▁interests ▁in : ▁ ▁Sh ield ing ▁children ▁from ▁potentially ▁off ensive ▁material , ▁and ▁ ▁Ens uring ▁that ▁unw anted ▁speech ▁does ▁not ▁intr ude ▁on ▁the ▁priv acy ▁of ▁one ' s ▁home . ▁ ▁The ▁Pacific a ▁Court ▁u ph eld ▁the ▁F CC ' s ▁power ▁to ▁reg ulate ▁broadcast ▁media , ▁cit ing ▁two ▁per v ading ▁government al ▁interests . ▁First , ▁the ▁“ uni qu ely ▁per vas ive ” ▁nature ▁of ▁these ▁broadcast s ▁allows ▁them ▁to ▁se ep ▁into ▁“ the ▁priv acy ▁of ▁the ▁home ” ▁without ▁the ▁consent ▁of ▁the ▁vie wer . ▁Second , ▁broadcast s ▁are ▁“ uni qu ely ▁accessible ▁to ▁children ” ▁whose ▁“ v oc ab ul ary ▁[ could ▁be ▁en larg ed ] ▁in ▁an ▁instant ” ▁by ▁hearing ▁inde cent ▁or ▁prof ane ▁language . ▁The ▁Court ▁held ▁that ▁these ▁two ▁concerns ▁were ▁sufficient ▁to ▁“ just ify ▁special ▁treatment ▁of ▁inde cent ▁broadcast ing ,” ▁thereby ▁allowing ▁the ▁F CC ▁to ▁fine ▁broad c aster s ▁for ▁air ing ▁in app ropri ate ▁content . ▁ ▁The ▁Court ▁stated ▁that ▁the ▁F CC ▁had ▁the ▁authority ▁to ▁prohib it ▁such ▁broadcast s ▁during ▁hours ▁when ▁children ▁were ▁likely ▁to ▁be ▁among ▁the ▁audience , ▁and ▁gave ▁the ▁F CC ▁broad ▁le ew ay ▁to ▁determine ▁what ▁constit uted ▁inde c ency ▁in ▁different ▁context s . ▁