ments ▁in ▁central ▁London , ▁calling ▁it ▁" d ign ified ▁and ▁ref ined , ▁and ▁the ▁talk ▁of ▁trans par ency ▁and ▁open ness ▁is ▁genu ine ." ▁He ▁pra ised ▁the ▁" be aut iful ▁precision " ▁and ▁complexity ▁of ▁the ▁cer am ic ▁fa ç ade , ▁cit ing ▁its ▁" depth ▁and ▁rich ness " ▁and ▁the ▁" jud gment ▁in ▁their ▁precise ▁t ones ". ▁ ▁I ke ▁I je h ▁of ▁Building ▁noted ▁that ▁the ▁striking ▁colours ▁of ▁Central ▁Saint ▁G iles ▁provided ▁a ▁" contr ast ▁with ▁the ▁traditional ▁London ▁grey / b rown ▁of ▁the ▁surrounding ▁towns cape ▁[ that ] ▁is ▁both ▁sur real ▁and ▁cin ematic ". ▁Although ▁he ▁was ▁critical ▁of ▁the ▁monot on ous ▁appearance ▁of ▁the ▁building ' s ▁external ▁windows , ▁he ▁gave ▁" a ▁res ounding ▁and ▁une qu iv ocal ▁yes " ▁to ▁the ▁question ▁of ▁whether ▁the ▁development ▁succeeded , ▁comm ending ▁it ▁for ▁its ▁" sk il ful ▁construction ▁of ▁a ▁new ▁urban ▁identity ▁for ▁a ▁forgotten ▁area ▁and ▁the ▁gener os ity ▁of ▁its ▁ground ▁level ▁eng agement ▁with ▁context ." ▁ ▁Writing ▁in ▁Architecture ▁Today , ▁Ne ven ▁Sid or ▁comm ended ▁the ▁development ' s ▁design ▁for ▁" re ach [ ing ] ▁out ▁to ▁its ▁context ▁at ▁the ▁same ▁time ▁as ▁bold ly ▁as ser ting ▁its ▁own ▁person ality ." ▁He ▁commented ▁that ▁" some how ▁colour ▁ther apy ▁and ▁fine ▁ter rac otta ▁mod elling ▁make ▁the ▁effect ▁u