cy ▁invalid ▁or ▁irrelevant ". ▁ ▁The ▁majority ▁of ▁those ▁who ▁support ▁the ▁King ▁James ▁Only ▁movement ▁reject ▁R uck man ' s ▁position ▁that ▁the ▁English ▁K J V ▁is ▁superior ▁to ▁existing ▁Heb rew ▁and ▁Greek ▁manuscript s , ▁and ▁they ▁also ▁critic ize ▁R uck man ▁because ▁" his ▁writ ings ▁are ▁so ▁ac erb ic , ▁so ▁off ensive ▁and ▁mean - sp ir ited ▁that ▁the ▁entire ▁movement ▁has ▁become ▁identified ▁with ▁his ▁kind ▁of ▁confront ational ▁attitude ". ▁ ▁The ▁website ▁of ▁R uck man ' s ▁press ▁notes ▁that ▁although ▁some ▁have ▁called ▁his ▁writ ings ▁" mean ▁spir ited ", ▁" we ▁refer ▁to ▁them ▁as ▁' tr uth ▁with ▁an ▁attitude ' ". ▁ ▁According ▁to ▁Beach am ▁and ▁Ba uder , ▁" R uck man ▁is ▁without ▁any ▁doubt ▁the ▁most ▁ca ust ic ▁and ▁ab us ive ▁among ▁King ▁James - Only ▁part is ans ". ▁James ▁R . ▁White ▁states ▁in ▁his ▁book ▁The ▁King ▁James ▁Only ▁Cont ro vers y ▁that ▁to ▁call ▁R uck man ▁" out sp oken ▁is ▁to ▁eng age ▁in ▁an ▁exercise ▁in ▁under statement . ▁Ca ust ic ▁is ▁too ▁m ild ▁a ▁term ; ▁bomb astic ▁is ▁a ▁little ▁more ▁accurate .   ... ▁There ▁is ▁no ▁doubt ▁that ▁Peter ▁S . ▁R uck man ▁is ▁brilliant , ▁in ▁a ▁strange ▁sort ▁of ▁way . ▁His ▁mental ▁powers ▁are ▁plain ly ▁demonstrated ▁in ▁his ▁books , ▁though ▁most ▁people ▁do ▁not ▁bother ▁to