▁have ▁comp elling ▁grounds ▁for ▁dissol ving ▁the ▁marriage . ▁The ▁court ▁starts ▁the ▁process ▁by ▁appoint ing ▁an ▁arbitr ator ▁from ▁each ▁of ▁their ▁families ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁seek ▁a ▁medi ated ▁recon c ili ation . ▁If ▁this ▁effort ▁fails , ▁the ▁court ▁adj ud ic ates ▁the ▁dispute ▁by ▁app ort ion ing ▁fault ▁for ▁the ▁break down ▁of ▁the ▁marriage ▁with ▁the ▁associated ▁financial ▁consequences . ▁Ex amples ▁of ▁fault ▁are ▁cruel ty ; ▁husband ' s ▁failure ▁to ▁provide ▁maintenance ▁or ▁pay ▁the ▁immediate ▁install ment ▁of ▁ma hr ; ▁inf idel ity ; ▁desert ion ; ▁moral ▁or ▁social ▁in compat ibility ; ▁certain ▁a il ments ; ▁and ▁imprison ment ▁harm ful ▁to ▁the ▁marriage . ▁Jud icial ▁divor ce ▁can ▁also ▁be ▁sought ▁over ▁viol ations ▁of ▁terms ▁st ip ulated ▁in ▁the ▁marriage ▁contract . ▁D ifferent ▁legal ▁schools ▁recognized ▁different ▁subsets ▁of ▁these ▁grounds ▁for ▁divor ce . ▁The ▁Mal iki ▁school , ▁which ▁recognized ▁the ▁wid est ▁range ▁of ▁grounds ▁for ▁divor ce , ▁also ▁st ip ul ates ▁a ▁category ▁of ▁" harm " ▁( ḍ ar ar ), ▁which ▁gave ▁the ▁judge ▁significant ▁dis cret ion ▁of ▁interpretation . ▁ ▁Pract ice ▁ ▁In ▁some ▁areas ▁under ▁Ott oman ▁rule ▁it ▁was ▁hardly ▁possible ▁for ▁women ▁to ▁obtain ▁divor ce ▁except ▁through ▁k h ul ' ▁due ▁to ▁the ▁restriction ▁im posed ▁by ▁the ▁prev ail ing ▁H ana fi ▁school , ▁though ▁some ▁exceptions ▁have ▁been ▁found . ▁The