▁Award ▁was ▁a ▁sur real ▁honor ▁and ▁that ▁the ▁site ▁was ▁changing ▁culture ▁" quick ly ▁and ▁completely ". ▁ ▁The ▁YouTube ▁Awards ▁returned ▁the ▁following ▁year , ▁to ▁comm emor ate ▁the ▁best ▁videos ▁of ▁ 2 0 0 7 . ▁That ▁year , ▁the ▁number ▁of ▁categories ▁was ▁expanded ▁from ▁seven ▁to ▁twelve , ▁while ▁the ▁number ▁of ▁videos ▁per ▁short list ▁was ▁reduced ▁from ▁ten ▁to ▁six . ▁Crit ics ▁noted ▁that ▁unlikely ▁new com ers , ▁such ▁as ▁Battle ▁at ▁Kru ger ▁and ▁Stop ▁the ▁Cl ash ▁of ▁Civil izations ▁by ▁A va az , ▁had ▁triumph ed ▁over ▁more ▁established ▁videos , ▁such ▁as ▁I ▁Got ▁a ▁Cr ush ... On ▁Ob ama ▁and ▁Le ave ▁Brit ney ▁Al one ! ▁Re action ▁to ▁the ▁YouTube ▁Awards ▁was ▁generally ▁negative . ▁In ▁ 2 0 0 7 , ▁comment ators ▁question ed ▁why ▁a ▁promotion ▁to ▁recognize ▁the ▁best ▁videos ▁of ▁ 2 0 0 6 ▁was ▁taking ▁place ▁so ▁late ▁into ▁the ▁year , ▁and ▁contrast ed ▁the ▁awards ▁with ▁the ▁similar ▁V log g ies . ▁Att ention ▁was ▁also ▁drawn ▁to ▁the ▁timing ▁of ▁the ▁ 2 0 0 7 ▁awards : ▁five ▁days ▁after ▁media ▁con gl omer ate ▁Via com ▁had ▁file d ▁a ▁$ 1   b ill ion ▁law suit ▁against ▁YouTube ▁for ▁copy right ▁in fr ing ement . ▁Technology ▁evangel ist ▁Don ▁D odge ▁suggested ▁that ▁the ▁awards ▁were ▁an ▁attempt ▁by ▁YouTube ▁to ▁highlight ▁content ▁on ▁their ▁website