" ▁was ▁used ▁liber ally ▁by ▁Fre ud . ▁He ▁also ▁saw ▁magic ▁as ▁emer ging ▁from ▁human ▁em otion ▁but ▁interpreted ▁it ▁very ▁differently ▁to ▁Mare tt . ▁Fre ud ▁explains ▁that ▁" the ▁associated ▁theory ▁of ▁magic ▁merely ▁explains ▁the ▁paths ▁along ▁which ▁magic ▁proceed s ; ▁it ▁does ▁not ▁explain ▁its ▁true ▁ess ence , ▁namely ▁the ▁misunder standing ▁which ▁leads ▁it ▁to ▁replace ▁the ▁laws ▁of ▁nature ▁by ▁psych ological ▁ones ". ▁Fre ud ▁emphas izes ▁that ▁what ▁led ▁primitive ▁men ▁to ▁come ▁up ▁with ▁magic ▁is ▁the ▁power ▁of ▁wishes : ▁" H is ▁wishes ▁are ▁accompanied ▁by ▁a ▁motor ▁imp ulse , ▁the ▁will , ▁which ▁is ▁later ▁dest ined ▁to ▁alter ▁the ▁whole ▁face ▁of ▁the ▁earth ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁satisfy ▁his ▁wishes . ▁This ▁motor ▁imp ulse ▁is ▁at ▁first ▁employed ▁to ▁give ▁a ▁representation ▁of ▁the ▁satisfying ▁situation ▁in ▁such ▁a ▁way ▁that ▁it ▁becomes ▁possible ▁to ▁experience ▁the ▁satisfaction ▁by ▁means ▁of ▁what ▁might ▁be ▁described ▁as ▁motor ▁hall uc in ations . ▁This ▁kind ▁of ▁representation ▁of ▁a ▁satisfied ▁wish ▁is ▁quite ▁compar able ▁to ▁children ' s ▁play , ▁which ▁succeed s ▁their ▁earlier ▁purely ▁sens ory ▁technique ▁of ▁satisfaction . ▁[...] ▁As ▁time ▁goes ▁on , ▁the ▁psych ological ▁acc ent ▁sh ifts ▁from ▁the ▁mot ives ▁for ▁the ▁mag ical ▁act ▁on ▁to ▁the ▁measures ▁by ▁which ▁it ▁is ▁carried ▁out — that ▁is , ▁on ▁to ▁the ▁act ▁itself . ▁[...] ▁It ▁thus ▁comes ▁to ▁appear ▁as ▁though