▁prison ▁and ▁ordered ▁to ▁pay ▁a ▁$ 1 . 2 5 ▁million ▁fine . ▁ ▁The ▁conv ict ions ▁of ▁both ▁Re yes ▁and ▁J ensen ▁were ▁appe aled . ▁ ▁On ▁August ▁ 1 8 , ▁ 2 0 0 9 , ▁the ▁United ▁States ▁Court ▁of ▁App e als ▁for ▁the ▁N inth ▁Circ uit ▁over turn ed ▁Gregory ▁Re yes ' ▁conv ict ions ▁and ▁sent ▁the ▁case ▁back ▁to ▁the ▁lower ▁courts ▁for ▁ret rial , ▁where ▁he ▁was ▁again ▁conv icted , ▁and ▁sent enced ▁to ▁ 1 8 ▁months ▁in ▁prison ▁and ▁a ▁$ 1 0 ▁million ▁fine . ▁ ▁Re yes ▁was ▁in car cer ated ▁at ▁the ▁T aft ▁Cor re ction al ▁Institution ▁in ▁T aft , ▁California , ▁with ▁an ▁anticip ated ▁release ▁date ▁of ▁December ▁ 2 9 , ▁ 2 0 1 1 . ▁ ▁, ▁a ▁second ▁appeal ▁remains ▁pending . ▁ ▁Bro cade ▁announced ▁on ▁August ▁ 6 , ▁ 2 0 1 2 , ▁a ▁San ▁Jose ▁federal ▁court ▁j ury ▁returned ▁its ▁ver dict ▁in ▁the ▁case ▁of ▁Bro cade ▁v . ▁A 1 0 ▁Network s , ▁and ▁found ▁A 1 0 ▁responsible ▁for ▁broad - based ▁intellectual ▁property ▁in fr ing ement ▁and ▁unf air ▁competition , ▁award ing ▁approximately ▁$ 1 1 2 ▁million ▁to ▁Bro cade ▁The ▁trial ▁last ed ▁three ▁weeks . ▁The ▁j ury ▁un anim ously ▁awarded ▁pun itive ▁dam ages ▁against ▁A 1 0 ▁and ▁also ▁personally ▁against ▁its