▁person ▁or ▁even ▁a ▁sick ness . ▁It ▁should ▁not ▁be ▁so ▁interpreted ." ▁ ▁The ▁term ▁" object ively ▁dis ordered " ▁does ▁not ▁refer ▁to ▁the ▁person ▁themselves . ▁ ▁H ume ▁continued : ▁ ▁First , ▁the ▁word ▁is ▁a ▁term ▁belonging ▁to ▁the ▁voc ab ul ary ▁of ▁traditional ▁Catholic ▁moral ▁the ology ▁and ▁philosophy . ▁It ▁is ▁used ▁to ▁describe ▁an ▁incl ination ▁which ▁is ▁a ▁departure ▁from ▁what ▁is ▁generally ▁regarded ▁to ▁be ▁the ▁norm . ▁The ▁norm ▁consists ▁of ▁an ▁incl ination ▁towards ▁a ▁sexual ▁relationship ▁with ▁a ▁person ▁of ▁the ▁opposite ▁sex ▁and ▁not ▁between ▁persons ▁of ▁the ▁same ▁sex . ▁Being ▁a ▁hom osex ual ▁person ▁is , ▁then , ▁neither ▁mor ally ▁good ▁nor ▁mor ally ▁bad ; ▁it ▁is ▁hom osex ual ▁gen ital ▁acts ▁that ▁are ▁mor ally ▁wrong . ▁Second ly , ▁when ▁the ▁Church ▁speak s ▁of ▁the ▁incl ination ▁to ▁hom osex ual ity ▁as ▁being ▁' an ▁objective ▁dis order ' ▁( PC ▁para . 3 ), ▁she ▁does ▁not ▁consider , ▁of ▁course , ▁the ▁whole ▁person ality ▁and ▁character ▁of ▁the ▁individual ▁to ▁be ▁thereby ▁dis ordered . ▁ ▁At ▁the ▁ 2 0 1 5 ▁Syn od ▁on ▁the ▁Family , ▁Arch bishop ▁Charles ▁Chap ut ▁said ▁that ▁the ▁phrase ▁" in tr ins ically ▁dis ordered " ▁turns ▁people ▁off ▁and ▁" pro bably ▁isn ’ t ▁useful ▁anymore ." ▁ ▁While ▁making ▁clear ▁that ▁any ▁new ▁language ▁adopted ▁should ▁make ▁clear ▁the