port ion ate ▁share ▁of ▁resources ▁and ▁social ▁benefits . ▁ ▁Crit ique ▁ ▁Some ▁legal ▁sch ol ars ▁have ▁critic ized ▁C RT ▁on ▁a ▁number ▁of ▁grounds , ▁such ▁as ▁C RT ▁sch ol ars ' ▁reli ance ▁on ▁narr ative ▁and ▁story t elling , ▁or ▁C RT ' s ▁critique ▁of ▁object ivity . ▁Judge ▁Richard ▁Pos ner ▁of ▁the ▁United ▁States ▁Se vent h ▁Circ uit ▁Court ▁of ▁App e als ▁ ▁has ▁" label [ ed ] ▁critical ▁race ▁the or ists ▁and ▁post mod ern ists ▁the ▁' l un atic ▁core ' ▁of ▁' rad ical ▁legal ▁eg al itar ian ism .' " ▁ ▁He ▁wrote : ▁ ▁Judge ▁Alex ▁K oz in ski ▁of ▁the ▁N inth ▁Circ uit ▁Court ▁of ▁App e als ▁wrote ▁that ▁critical ▁race ▁the or ists ▁have ▁constructed ▁a ▁philosophy ▁which ▁makes ▁a ▁valid ▁exchange ▁of ▁ideas ▁between ▁the ▁various ▁discipl ines ▁un att ain able : ▁ ▁Daniel ▁Far ber ▁and ▁Su z anna ▁Sher ry ▁have ▁argued ▁that ▁critical ▁race ▁theory , ▁along ▁with ▁critical ▁femin ism ▁and ▁critical ▁legal ▁studies , ▁has ▁anti - S emit ic ▁and ▁anti - As ian ▁imp lications , ▁has ▁worked ▁to ▁und erm ine ▁not ions ▁of ▁dem ocr atic ▁community , ▁and ▁has ▁imp eded ▁dialog ue . ▁ ▁Henry ▁Louis ▁G ates ▁Jr . ▁has ▁written ▁a ▁critical ▁evaluation ▁of ▁C RT . ▁G ates ▁emphas izes ▁how ▁campus ▁speech ▁codes ▁and ▁anti - h ate