▁the ▁opposite ▁side ▁the ▁gro ove ▁may ▁be ▁absent ... ". ( p . ▁ 2 8 2 ) ▁ ▁K ern oh an ▁fully ▁described ▁the ▁K ern oh an ' s ▁not ch ▁in ▁ 1 9 2 9 ▁and ▁is ▁given ▁credit ▁for ▁its ▁discovery . ▁ ▁See ▁also ▁ ▁Int rac ran ial ▁pressure ▁ ▁Tra um atic ▁brain ▁injury ▁ ▁D ure t ▁ha emor rh age ▁This ▁is ▁an ▁interesting ▁story ▁in ▁that ▁K ern oh an ▁and ▁Wol t man ' s ▁article ▁never ▁did ▁support ▁their ▁own ▁cont ention ▁that ▁the ▁i ps il ater al ▁finding ▁they ▁reported ▁were ▁due ▁to ▁the ▁not ch ing ▁from ▁the ▁disp lacement ▁of ▁the ▁hem is phere ▁containing ▁the ▁tum or ▁( as ▁follows ): ▁ ▁As ▁seen ▁in ▁their ▁Fig . ▁ 7 , ▁There ▁were ▁a ▁total ▁of ▁ 3 5 ▁su pr at ent orial ▁cases ▁all ▁of ▁them ▁with ▁mid bra in ▁not ch ing ▁opposite ▁the ▁hem is phere ▁bearing ▁the ▁les ion . ▁However , ▁only ▁ 1 7 ▁of ▁these ▁ 3 5 ▁had ▁" false " ▁local izing ▁signs ▁( ips il ater al ▁to ▁the ▁tum or ; ▁hyper active ▁ref lex es , ▁up going ▁to es , ▁etc .). The ▁rest ▁did ▁not ▁have ▁such ▁signs . ▁Therefore , ▁log ically ▁speaking , ▁there ▁were ▁no ▁cause ▁and ▁effect ▁relationship ▁between ▁not ch ing ▁and ▁the ▁" h erni ation " ▁signs ▁( ag ain ,