▁to ▁suffer ▁harm ▁leading ▁to ▁later ▁death , ▁and ▁summar ized ▁the ▁legal ▁position ▁of ▁the ▁ 1 9 9 4 ▁case : ▁▁ ▁" The ▁intention ▁which ▁must ▁be ▁discovered ▁is ▁an ▁intention ▁to ▁do ▁an ▁act ▁which ▁is ▁un law ful ▁and ▁dangerous ▁... ▁ir res pective ▁of ▁who ▁was ▁the ▁ult imate ▁victim ▁of ▁it . ▁The ▁fact ▁that ▁the ▁child ▁whom ▁the ▁mother ▁was ▁carrying ▁at ▁the ▁time ▁was ▁born ▁alive ▁and ▁then ▁died ▁as ▁a ▁result ▁of ▁the ▁st abb ing ▁is ▁all ▁that ▁was ▁needed ▁for ▁the ▁off ence ▁of ▁m ans la ugh ter ▁when ▁act us ▁re us ▁for ▁that ▁crime ▁was ▁completed ▁by ▁the ▁child ' s ▁death . ▁The ▁question , ▁once ▁all ▁the ▁other ▁elements ▁are ▁satisfied , ▁is ▁simply ▁one ▁of ▁caus ation . ▁The ▁def endant ▁must ▁accept ▁all ▁the ▁consequences ▁of ▁his ▁act , ▁so ▁long ▁as ▁the ▁j ury ▁are ▁satisfied ▁that ▁he ▁did ▁what ▁he ▁did ▁intention ally , ▁that ▁what ▁he ▁did ▁was ▁un law ful ▁and ▁that , ▁applying ▁the ▁correct ▁test , ▁it ▁was ▁also ▁dangerous . ▁The ▁death ▁of ▁the ▁child ▁was ▁un intent ional , ▁but ▁the ▁nature ▁and ▁quality ▁of ▁the ▁act ▁which ▁caused ▁it ▁was ▁such ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁criminal ▁and ▁therefore ▁pun ish able . ▁In ▁my ▁opinion ▁that ▁is ▁sufficient ▁for ▁the ▁off ence ▁of ▁m ans la ugh ter . ▁There ▁is ▁no ▁need ▁to ▁look ▁to ▁the ▁doctrine ▁of ▁transferred ▁mal ice ..." In ▁other ▁cases