▁the ▁basis ▁of ▁in compat ibility , ▁with ▁focus ▁on ▁Art . ▁ 8 ▁( right ▁to ▁priv acy ▁and ▁family ▁life ), ▁Art . ▁ 1 0 ▁( fre edom ▁of ▁speech ) ▁and ▁Art . ▁ 1 1 ▁( fre edom ▁of ▁assembly ). ▁In ▁the ▁case ▁of ▁J J , ▁the ▁House ▁of ▁L ords ▁drew ▁an ▁anal ogy ▁between ▁a ▁prisoner ▁in ▁an ▁open ▁prison , ▁and ▁a ▁sus pected ▁terror ist ▁under ▁a ▁control ▁order . ▁Con sequently , ▁it ▁was ▁viewed ▁as ▁an ▁anom aly ▁for ▁the ▁Home ▁Secretary ▁to ▁en force ▁har sh er ▁conditions ▁on ▁an ▁individual ▁who ▁has ▁not ▁been ▁conv icted ▁of ▁any ▁crime , ▁in ▁comparison ▁with ▁an ▁open ▁prisoner ▁who ▁enjo ys ▁freedom ▁of ▁association . ▁The ▁court ▁brought ▁up ▁the ▁example ▁of ▁the ▁d eta ine e ▁being ▁in ▁a ▁" pr ison ▁with ▁three ▁walls ", ▁the ▁fourth ▁wall ▁of ▁course ▁being ▁that ▁of ▁volunt ary ▁deport ation , ▁which ▁is ▁a ▁der og ation ▁from ▁Art . ▁ 5 ▁under ▁Art . ▁ 5 ( 1 )( g ) ▁of ▁the ▁E CH R ▁( det ention ▁with ▁a ▁view ▁to ▁deport ▁is ▁compatible ). ▁However , ▁in ▁reality , ▁such ▁a ▁decision ▁is ▁highly ▁unlikely , ▁as ▁the ▁d eta ine e ▁would ▁be ▁unw illing ▁to ▁return ▁home ▁and ▁be ▁subject ed ▁to ▁tort ure ▁and / or ▁in human / de grad ing ▁treatment . ▁ ▁See ▁also ▁T error ism ▁Act ▁ 2 0