Sto ck bro ker ' s ▁News ) ▁suggested ▁that ▁" the ▁opinions ▁will ▁be ▁polar ized ▁due ▁not ▁to ▁the ▁gener ations ' ▁divide ▁port rayed ▁in ▁the ▁play , ▁but ▁rather ▁the ▁sch ism ▁that ▁exists ▁in ▁the ▁public ▁and ▁among ▁the ▁so - called ▁critics ." ▁ ▁Alex ey ▁G vo z dev ▁critic ized ▁the ▁author ' s ▁" c old , ▁strictly ▁intellectual ▁approach ▁to ▁life , ▁which ▁free zes ▁the ▁thought ▁lif eless ▁in ▁abstract ▁schemes ," ▁and ▁" the ▁false ▁jo ys ▁of ▁optim istic ▁hope ▁for ▁' h appy ▁Renaissance ', " ▁– ▁the ▁draw back s ▁which ▁in ▁his ▁opinion ▁" st if led ▁even ▁the ▁ ▁possibility ▁of ▁there ▁being ▁created ▁in ▁it ▁some ▁l ively ▁characters ." ▁A . ▁Ly ub im ov ▁in ▁N ashi ▁D ni ▁called ▁the ▁play ▁" fault y , ▁d ull ▁and ▁talent less ," ▁while ▁A . ▁Che bot ary ova ▁described ▁it ▁as ▁" ma w k ish , ▁pre post er ous ▁and ▁t endent ious ." ▁ ▁Nikol ai ▁Ash esh ov ▁in ▁the ▁March ▁ 1 9 1 5 ▁issue ▁of ▁Sov re men ny ▁Mir ▁called ▁The ▁Green ▁Ring ▁" comple t ely ▁un ri pe ▁play " ▁while ▁Vik tor ▁Bur en in ▁expressed ▁his ▁attitude ▁towards ▁the ▁production ▁by ▁calling ▁his ▁Nov o ye ▁V re my a ▁review ▁" The ▁Tri umph ▁of ▁Fail ure " ▁( Т ор же ство ▁п рова ла ). ▁ ▁Ly