▁the ▁group ▁rep a id ▁majority ▁of ▁its ▁OF CD ▁invest ors ▁between ▁May ▁the ▁last ▁date ▁of ▁hearing ▁and ▁by ▁ 3 0 ▁August ▁ 2 0 1 2 ▁the ▁final ▁order . ▁Since ▁these ▁rep ay ments ▁have ▁not ▁been ▁taken ▁into ▁consideration , ▁Sah ara ▁maintain s ▁that ▁any ▁money ▁paid ▁now ▁will ▁obviously ▁mean ▁a ▁double ▁payment ▁towards ▁one ▁li ability . ▁ ▁It ▁is ▁also ▁been ▁reported ▁that ▁Sah ara ▁has ▁paid ▁R s ▁ 7 2 5 . 9 7 ▁cr ore ▁as ▁T DS ▁( tax ▁dedu cted ▁at ▁source ) ▁to ▁the ▁In come ▁Tax ▁Depart ments ▁on ▁the ▁interest ▁which ▁along ▁with ▁invest ment ▁was ▁rep a id ▁to ▁ 9 5 ▁percent ▁of ▁the ▁invest ors , ▁between ▁ 2 0 0 9 – 1 0 ▁and ▁ 2 0 1 2 – 1 3 . ▁The ▁income ▁tax ▁authorities ▁had ▁found ▁that ▁the ▁benef ici ary ▁invest ors ▁were ▁exist ent ▁and ▁accordingly ▁confirmed ▁the ▁rep ay ments ▁made ▁in ▁those ▁particular ▁years . ▁One ▁of ▁Sah ara ' s ▁arguments ▁in ▁the ▁a pe x ▁court ▁revol ves ▁around ▁the ▁fact ▁that ▁if ▁one ▁government ▁body ▁has ▁found ▁invest ors , ▁why ▁can ' t ▁the ▁other . ▁ ▁The ▁case ▁itself ▁compr ises ▁big ▁numbers ▁such ▁as ▁collection ▁of ▁over ▁R s ▁ 2 4 , 0 0 0 ▁cr ore ▁from ▁three ▁cr ore ▁individuals , ▁while ▁once ▁in ▁ 2 0 1 3 ▁Sah ara ▁sent ▁ 1