▁the ▁condition ▁of ▁his ▁ 1 9 7 1 ▁president ial ▁p ardon ▁bar ring ▁him ▁from ▁eng aging ▁in ▁" direct ▁or ▁indirect ▁management ▁of ▁any ▁labor ▁union " ▁until ▁March ▁ 1 9 8 0 . ▁Pr att ▁ruled ▁in ▁ 1 9 7 4 ▁that ▁the ▁condition ▁of ▁the ▁p ardon ▁was ▁valid ▁because ▁( 1 ) ▁it ▁had ▁a ▁direct ▁relationship ▁to ▁the ▁public ▁interest ▁and ▁( 2 ) ▁it ▁did ▁not ▁" un reason ably ▁in fr inge " ▁on ▁Hoff a ' s ▁constitution al ▁fre ed oms . ▁ ▁Pr att ▁also ▁issued ▁r ul ings ▁on ▁important ▁civil ▁rights ▁issues . ▁He ▁ordered ▁the ▁rest oration ▁of ▁the ▁Def ense ▁Department ▁security ▁clear ances ▁of ▁two ▁hom osex uals ▁in ▁ 1 9 7 1 , ▁holding ▁that ▁" g overn ment ▁security ▁evalu ators ▁cannot ▁subject ▁hom osex uals ▁to ▁' pro bing ▁personal ▁questions ' ▁about ▁their ▁sex ▁lives ▁or ▁with hold ▁security ▁clear ances ▁for ▁ref us al ▁to ▁answer ▁such ▁questions ." ▁ ▁Pr att ▁also ▁pres ided ▁over ▁another ▁case , ▁Adams ▁v . ▁Richard son , ▁brought ▁by ▁the ▁NA AC P ▁Leg al ▁Def ense ▁and ▁Edu c ational ▁Fund . ▁The ▁NA AC P ▁sought ▁to ▁comp el ▁the ▁United ▁States ▁Department ▁of ▁Health , ▁Education ▁and ▁W elf are ▁( HE W ) ▁to ▁speed ▁up ▁des eg reg ation ▁in ▁schools . ▁Pr att ▁rejected ▁the ▁HE W ' s ▁argument ▁that ▁Title ▁VI ▁of