▁' und ue ▁or ▁un reason able ▁preference ' ▁to ▁any ▁person ▁or ▁company . ▁The ▁Court ▁of ▁Common ▁Ple as ▁gave ▁him ▁his ▁inj unction ▁in ▁January ▁ 1 8 5 8 : ▁the ▁threat ▁of ▁losing ▁the ▁F let ch ers ' ▁traffic ▁was ▁not ▁a ▁valid ▁reason ▁for ▁charg ing ▁them ▁a ▁lower ▁rate ▁than ▁that ▁charged ▁to ▁Mr ▁Harris . ▁Mr ▁Harris ▁then ▁joined ▁the ▁board , ▁which ▁announced ▁a ▁un anim ous ▁decision ▁to ▁set ▁up ▁a ▁committee ▁( five ▁members , ▁all ▁un connected ▁with ▁the ▁coal ▁trade ) ▁to ▁rev ise ▁the ▁rates ▁charged ▁- ▁including ▁those ▁agreed ▁with ▁Mess rs ▁F let cher , ▁should ▁the ▁committee ▁feel ▁just ified ▁in ▁inter fer ing ▁( c oun sel ▁would ▁be ▁consult ed ▁first ). ▁The ▁revis ing ▁committee ▁arrived ▁at ▁new ▁rates ▁to ▁come ▁into ▁effect ▁at ▁the ▁start ▁of ▁March ▁ 1 8 5 8 , ▁but ▁they ▁included ▁an ▁increased ▁rate ▁for ▁the ▁F let ch ers , ▁proposed ▁without ▁any ▁legal ▁advice ▁on ▁whether ▁the ▁existing ▁agreement ▁with ▁them ▁could ▁be ▁set ▁aside . ▁F let ch ers ▁refused ▁to ▁go ▁beyond ▁the ▁rates ▁for ▁which ▁they ▁had ▁an ▁agreement ▁they ▁considered ▁legal ▁and ▁leg ally ▁arrived ▁at ; ▁the ▁board ▁( who ▁considered ▁a ▁proposed ▁charge ▁for ▁the ▁C & W ▁operating ▁on ▁the ▁F let ch ers ' ▁private ▁sid ings ▁to ▁be ▁contrary ▁to ▁the ▁company ' s ▁Act ) ▁refused ▁to ▁en force ▁the ▁re vised ▁rates ▁unless