▁As yl um ▁Se ek er ▁Re ception ▁Center . ▁The ▁center ▁had ▁received ▁extensive ▁criticism ▁for ▁that ▁the ▁center ▁manager ▁counter ed ▁in ▁both ▁programs ▁and ▁also ▁later . ▁The ▁criticism ▁focused ▁on ▁the ▁center ▁manager ▁running ▁illegal ▁shop ▁activities ▁in ▁the ▁center , ▁repre hens ible ▁conditions ▁in ▁the ▁san it ary ▁install ations , ▁in ade qu ate ▁technical ▁maintenance , ▁lack ing ▁activation ▁opportun ities , ▁that ▁a ▁driver ▁( al ready ▁paid ▁to ▁do ▁the ▁job ) ▁demanded ▁payment ▁for ▁driving ▁residents ▁to ▁the ▁nearest ▁village ▁Fin ns nes , ▁and ▁that ▁the ▁center ▁manager ▁was ▁ins u fficient ly ▁available . ▁Prior ▁to ▁the ▁opening ▁of ▁the ▁center , ▁the ▁loc als ▁had ▁war ned ▁U DI ▁against ▁giving ▁operating ▁permit ▁to ▁a ▁person ▁that ▁was ▁previously ▁conv icted ▁for ▁economic ▁cr imes ▁and ▁had ▁run ▁bank rupt ▁several ▁times . ▁A ▁person ▁formerly ▁in ▁charge ▁of ▁activities ▁at ▁Sen je h esten ▁that ▁was ▁dismiss ed ▁from ▁his ▁position ▁and ▁to k ▁the ▁dismiss al ▁to ▁the ▁court ▁was ▁awarded ▁his ▁job ▁back , ▁and ▁a ▁financial ▁compens ation . ▁Sen je h esten ▁reception ▁center ▁was ▁later ▁closed ▁down ▁following ▁continuous ▁diss atisf action ▁from ▁U DI ▁regarding ▁how ▁the ▁center ▁was ▁run . ▁ ▁Following ▁the ▁B ren np unkt ▁program ▁showing ▁ 1 8 - year - old ▁Rost ami ▁in ▁front ▁of ▁an ▁enthus i astic ▁audience ▁at ▁a ▁public ▁meeting , ▁he ▁and ▁three ▁other ▁residents ▁was ▁ordered ▁to ▁move ▁from