▁with ▁His ▁fully ▁human ▁nature ▁yet ▁without ▁mixing , ▁bl ending ▁or ▁alter ation ." ▁ ▁The ▁Oriental ▁Orth odox ▁cont end ▁that ▁this ▁latter ▁teaching ▁has ▁been ▁misunder stood ▁as ▁mon oph ys it ism , ▁an ▁app ell ation ▁with ▁which ▁they ▁strongly ▁disag ree ▁but , ▁never theless , ▁refuse ▁to ▁accept ▁the ▁decre es ▁of ▁the ▁council , ▁likely ▁as ▁a ▁result ▁of ▁the ▁conduct ▁and ▁the ▁proceed ings ▁of ▁the ▁Council . ▁The ▁Eastern ▁Orth odox ▁Church es ▁have , ▁and ▁continue ▁to ▁view ▁the ▁Council ▁as ▁a ▁power ▁struggle ▁by ▁the ▁Church ▁of ▁Rome , ▁given ▁the ▁prom in ence ▁in ▁the ology , ▁spiritual ity ▁of ▁the ▁Oriental ▁Orth odox ▁Church es ▁in ▁the ▁Early ▁Church ▁and ▁during ▁the ▁first ▁ec umen ical ▁coun c ils . ▁ ▁Many ▁Ang lic ans ▁and ▁most ▁Protest ants ▁consider ▁it ▁to ▁be ▁the ▁last ▁author itative ▁ec umen ical ▁council . ▁These ▁churches , ▁along ▁with ▁Martin ▁Luther , ▁hold ▁that ▁both ▁conscience ▁and ▁script ure ▁pre empt ▁do ctr inal ▁coun c ils ▁and ▁generally ▁agree ▁that ▁the ▁conclus ions ▁of ▁later ▁coun c ils ▁were ▁un supported ▁by ▁or ▁contradict ory ▁to ▁script ure . ▁ ▁Results ▁The ▁Council ▁of ▁Chal ced on ▁issued ▁the ▁Chal ced onian ▁Definition , ▁which ▁rep udi ated ▁the ▁notion ▁of ▁a ▁single ▁nature ▁in ▁Christ , ▁and ▁declared ▁that ▁he ▁has ▁two ▁n atures ▁in ▁one ▁person ▁and ▁hyp ost asis . ▁It ▁also ▁ins isted ▁on ▁the ▁comple