em ology , ▁and ▁method ology ▁are ▁reflect ive ▁of ▁social ▁justice ▁practice ▁in ▁evaluation . ▁These ▁examples ▁focus ▁on ▁address ing ▁in equal ities ▁and ▁in just ices ▁in ▁society ▁by ▁prom oting ▁inclusion ▁and ▁equality ▁in ▁human ▁rights . ▁ ▁A xi ology ▁( Values ▁and ▁Value ▁Jud g ements ) ▁The ▁transform ative ▁parad ig m ' s ▁ax i ological ▁assumption ▁rest s ▁on ▁four ▁primary ▁principles : ▁ ▁The ▁importance ▁of ▁being ▁cult ur ally ▁respect ful ▁ ▁The ▁promotion ▁of ▁social ▁justice ▁ ▁The ▁further ance ▁of ▁human ▁rights ▁ ▁Address ing ▁in equ ities ▁ ▁Ont ology ▁( Re ality ) ▁D iffer ences ▁in ▁pers pect ives ▁on ▁ ▁what ▁is ▁real ▁are ▁determined ▁by ▁diverse ▁values ▁and ▁life ▁experiences . ▁ ▁In ▁turn ▁these ▁values ▁and ▁life ▁experiences ▁are ▁often ▁associated ▁with ▁differences ▁in ▁access ▁to ▁privile ge , ▁based ▁on ▁such ▁characteristics ▁as ▁dis ability , ▁gender , ▁sexual ▁identity , ▁religion , ▁race / eth nic ity , ▁national ▁orig ins , ▁political ▁party , ▁income ▁level , ▁are , ▁language , ▁ ▁and ▁imm igration ▁or ▁refuge e ▁status . ▁ ▁Ep ist em ology ▁( K now ledge ) ▁Know ledge ▁is ▁constructed ▁within ▁the ▁context ▁of ▁power ▁and ▁privile ge ▁with ▁consequences ▁attached ▁to ▁which ▁version ▁of ▁knowledge ▁is ▁given ▁privile ge . ▁ ▁" K now ledge ▁is ▁soci ally ▁and ▁histor ically ▁located ▁within ▁a ▁complex ▁cultural ▁context ". ▁ ▁Method ology ▁( System atic ▁In qu