▁claimed ▁in ▁ 1 9 3 3 ▁that ▁were ▁F asc ism ▁to ▁follow ▁the ▁modern ▁phase ▁of ▁capital ism , ▁its ▁path ▁would ▁" le ad ▁in ex or ably ▁into ▁state ▁capital ism , ▁which ▁is ▁nothing ▁more ▁nor ▁less ▁than ▁state ▁social ism ▁turned ▁on ▁its ▁head . ▁In ▁either ▁event , ▁[ wh ether ▁the ▁outcome ▁be ▁state ▁capital ism ▁or ▁state ▁social ism ] ▁the ▁result ▁is ▁the ▁b ureau c rat ization ▁of ▁the ▁economic ▁activities ▁of ▁the ▁nation ". ▁▁ ▁M uss ol ini ▁claimed ▁that ▁capital ism ▁had ▁deg ener ated ▁in ▁three ▁stages , ▁starting ▁with ▁dynamic ▁or ▁hero ic ▁capital ism ▁( 1 8 3 0 – 1 8 7 0 ), ▁followed ▁by ▁static ▁capital ism ▁( 1 8 7 0 – 1 9 1 4 ) ▁and ▁then ▁reaching ▁its ▁final ▁form ▁of ▁dec ad ent ▁capital ism , ▁also ▁known ▁as ▁super cap ital ism ▁beginning ▁in ▁ 1 9 1 4 . ▁ ▁M uss ol ini ▁den ounced ▁super cap ital ism ▁for ▁causing ▁the ▁" standard ization ▁of ▁hum ank ind " ▁and ▁for ▁causing ▁excess ive ▁consumption . ▁M uss ol ini ▁claimed ▁that ▁at ▁this ▁stage ▁of ▁super cap ital ism ▁"[ it ] ▁is ▁then ▁that ▁a ▁capital ist ▁enter prise , ▁when ▁difficulties ▁arise , ▁throws ▁itself ▁like ▁a ▁dead ▁weight ▁into ▁the ▁state ' s ▁arms . ▁It ▁is ▁then ▁that ▁state ▁inter vention ▁begins ▁and ▁becomes ▁more ▁necessary . ▁It ▁is