▁pres cri bing , ▁having ▁been ▁unable ▁yet ▁to ▁establish ▁a ▁principle ▁upon ▁which ▁to ▁ground ▁it ▁r ation ally ▁( what ▁is ▁known ▁as ▁the ▁‘ du al ▁rem edy ▁affair ’ ), ▁L ut ze ▁later ▁re - iss ued ▁the ▁ 5 th ▁edition ▁with ▁the ▁with dra wn ▁dual ▁rem edy ▁section ▁and ▁clin ically ▁pract iced ▁based ▁on ▁such ▁an ▁approach . ▁His ▁contribution ▁is ▁recognized ▁in ▁the ▁monument ▁to ▁both ▁H ahn emann ▁and ▁L ut ze ▁in ▁Kö then , ▁Germany . ▁ ▁Rö sch la ub ' s ▁innov ative ▁work ▁in ▁establish ing ▁a ▁teaching ▁clin ic ▁based ▁on ▁the ▁Brun onian ▁system , ▁in ▁conj unction ▁with ▁Dr . ▁Albert ▁Marcus , ▁was ▁developed ▁further ▁by ▁J . ▁L . ▁Schön lein ▁( 1 7 9 3 – 1 8 6 4 ), ▁ ▁who ▁is ▁recognized ▁explicitly ▁even ▁in ▁allo path ic ▁histor i ography ▁for ▁having ▁established ▁the ▁scientific ▁foundation ▁for ▁the ▁modern ▁teaching ▁and ▁practice ▁clin ic . ▁This ▁foundation ▁is ▁one ▁based ▁on ▁natural ▁science , ▁but ▁also ▁on ▁the ▁arte ▁( P as cal ' s ▁spirit ▁of ▁fin esse ) ▁of ▁the ▁pract ition er , ▁which ▁is ▁something ▁objective ▁and ▁reprodu cible ▁though ▁based ▁on ▁a ▁different ▁logic ▁and ▁involving ▁more ▁fug itive ▁causes ▁( allo path ic ▁‘ med ic ine ’ ▁accepting ▁only ▁the ▁first ▁and ▁then ▁only ▁natural ▁in ert ial ▁science , ▁not ▁a ▁true ▁phys i ology ▁of ▁functions , ▁both