ften post en ▁ 5 . ▁July ▁ 2 0 0 7 ▁ ▁In ▁ 2 0 1 0 ▁he ▁was ▁strongly ▁critic ized ▁in ▁A ften post en ▁by ▁Communic ations ▁Director ▁Martin ▁A pen es ▁of ▁the ▁Norwegian ▁Labour ▁and ▁W elf are ▁Administration ▁( NA V ) ▁for ▁having ▁published ▁a ▁" def ence ▁speech " ▁on ▁www . une . no , ▁as ▁was ▁done ▁in ▁the ▁Rost ami ▁case : ▁U gly ▁thing , ▁U NE ▁- ▁A ften post en ▁ 1 . ▁April ▁ 2 0 1 0 ▁ ▁Human ▁rights ▁advoc ate ▁Mah m ood ▁Am iry - M og h add am ▁to ▁N ett av isen ▁The ▁new ▁ind ict ment ▁against ▁him ▁is ▁based ▁on ▁his ▁participation ▁to ▁opposition ▁meet ings ▁while ▁he ▁was ▁in ▁Norway . ▁This ▁shows ▁that ▁Iran ian ▁authorities ▁monitor ▁the ▁activities ▁of ▁Iran ians ▁abroad , ▁and ▁uses ▁it ▁against ▁them ▁when ▁they ▁return ▁to ▁the ▁country . ▁Norwegian ▁authorities ▁must ▁take ▁into ▁account ▁such ▁potential ▁consequences ▁when ▁deport ing ▁Iran ian ▁as yl um ▁seek ers ▁to ▁Iran . Att orney ▁Cec il ie ▁Sch j at vet ▁to ▁week ly ▁magazine ▁Ny ▁T id ▁ ▁( ▁English ▁translation ) There ▁is ▁no ▁doubt ▁that ▁the ▁ind ict ment ▁and ▁death ▁penalty ▁against ▁Rah im ▁Rost ami ▁are ▁real , ▁and ▁that ▁the ▁return ▁to ▁Iran ▁has ▁put ▁his ▁life ▁at ▁risk . ▁The ▁Rah im ▁case ▁demonstr ates ▁that ▁the ▁methods ▁used ▁by ▁Norwegian ▁imm