, ▁ 1 9 8 2 . ▁The ▁appointment ▁of ▁Justice ▁Nad on ▁was ▁therefore ▁void ▁ab ▁init io . ▁ ▁He ▁remained ▁a ▁super numer ary ▁judge ▁of ▁the ▁Federal ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al . ▁ ▁D issent ▁by ▁Justice ▁Mold aver ▁Justice ▁Mold aver ▁diss ented . ▁ ▁He ▁argued ▁that ▁section ▁ 5 ▁and ▁section ▁ 6 ▁of ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁Act ▁had ▁to ▁be ▁read ▁together , ▁and ▁that ▁the ▁requirement ▁in ▁section ▁ 6 ▁that ▁Quebec ▁app o inte es ▁be ▁from ▁" am ong ▁the ▁advoc ates ▁of ▁that ▁province " ▁included ▁former ▁members ▁of ▁the ▁Quebec ▁bar , ▁the ▁same ▁as ▁for ▁appoint ments ▁from ▁the ▁other ▁provinces ▁under ▁section ▁ 5 . ▁ ▁Rec us al ▁by ▁Justice ▁Roth stein ▁Justice ▁Roth stein ▁did ▁not ▁particip ate ▁in ▁the ▁decision . ▁He ▁had ▁been ▁appointed ▁from ▁the ▁Federal ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al , ▁leading ▁to ▁the ▁possibility ▁that ▁his ▁right ▁to ▁be ▁appointed ▁might ▁be ▁called ▁into ▁question . ▁However , ▁since ▁he ▁had ▁previously ▁been ▁a ▁member ▁of ▁the ▁bar ▁of ▁Man it oba , ▁the ▁decision ▁did ▁not ▁leave ▁his ▁appointment ▁in ▁doubt , ▁since ▁he ▁qualified ▁under ▁the ▁general ▁app o inte e ▁principle ▁set ▁out ▁in ▁section ▁ 5 ▁of ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁Act . ▁ ▁References ▁ ▁External ▁links ▁▁ ▁Reference ▁re ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁Act , ▁ss . ▁ 5 ▁and ▁ 6 ▁ ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁Act , ▁R SC ▁ 1 9 8 5 , ▁c ▁S