0 3 ▁there ▁were ▁compla ints ▁that ▁Re e ves ▁had ▁provided ▁obst et ric ▁services ▁to ▁a ▁patient ▁at ▁B ega ▁Hospital ▁on ▁ 3 ▁January , ▁and ▁G SA HS ▁became ▁aware ▁that , ▁Re e ves ' ▁undert aking ▁to ▁the ▁contrary , ▁he ▁had ▁not ▁applied ▁to ▁the ▁Board ▁for ▁a ▁review ▁of ▁the ▁restriction ▁on ▁his ▁obst et ric ▁practice . ▁On ▁ 1 0 ▁January ▁further ▁compla ints ▁about ▁Re e ves ' ▁conduct ▁towards ▁other ▁staff ▁became ▁known ▁to ▁B ega ▁Hospital ▁management , ▁but ▁as ▁they ▁were ▁purs uing ▁his ▁una ut hor ised ▁practice ▁of ▁obst et rics , ▁these ▁compla ints ▁about ▁conduct ▁were ▁not ▁purs ued . ▁ ▁After ▁the ▁compla ints ▁about ▁una ut hor ised ▁obst et ric ▁practice ▁at ▁B ega ▁Hospital , ▁G SA HS ▁continued ▁to ▁allow ▁Re e ves ▁to ▁practice ▁as ▁a ▁g yna ec ologist , ▁uncertain ▁as ▁to ▁whether ▁they ▁had ▁the ▁power ▁to ▁susp end ▁him . ▁On ▁ 1 8 ▁February ▁ 2 0 0 3 , ▁the ▁Medical ▁Board ▁ordered ▁that ▁Re e ves ' ▁ban ▁from ▁obst et ric ▁practice ▁continue ▁and ▁on ▁ 7 ▁April ▁G SA HS ▁not ified ▁Re e ves ▁of ▁the ▁forth coming ▁term ination ▁of ▁his ▁contract , ▁although ▁Re e ves ▁continued ▁to ▁provide ▁g yna ec ological ▁services ▁up ▁to ▁ 1 1 ▁July , ▁the ▁last ▁day ▁of ▁his ▁contract . ▁ ▁Jon ▁Mort imer , ▁the ▁G SA HS