▁a ▁Chapter ▁III ▁court ▁able ▁of ▁exer cis ing ▁jud icial ▁power . ▁ ▁The ▁case ▁of ▁Br andy ▁is ▁constitution ally ▁significant ▁first ly ▁because ▁its ▁decision ▁re - emph as ises ▁the ▁limited ▁number ▁of ▁bodies ▁which ▁are ▁permitted ▁to ▁exercise ▁jud icial ▁power . ▁The ▁decision ▁of ▁Br andy ▁emphas ised ▁the ▁fact ▁that ▁non - jud icial ▁trib un als ▁and ▁other ▁administrative ▁bodies ▁which ▁did ▁not ▁const itute ▁a ▁Chapter ▁III ▁court ▁of ▁the ▁constitution ▁could ▁not ▁exercise ▁jud icial ▁power . ▁This ▁had ▁a ▁two fold ▁effect ▁in ▁that ▁it ▁halt ed ▁the ▁creation ▁of ▁a ▁number ▁of ▁non - jud icial ▁bodies ▁which ▁were ▁to ▁be ▁emp ower ed ▁with ▁such ▁respons ib ilities , ▁as ▁well ▁as ▁pre - empt ing ▁the ▁creation ▁of ▁another ▁Chapter ▁III ▁court ▁to ▁manage ▁claims ▁of ▁this ▁nature , ▁which ▁is ▁today ▁known ▁as ▁the ▁Federal ▁Circ uit ▁Court ▁of ▁Australia . ▁The ▁decision ▁did ▁have ▁draw back s , ▁as ▁the ▁problem ▁of ▁in e ffic iency ▁and ▁high ▁costs , ▁which ▁prompt ed ▁the ▁creation ▁of ▁the ▁am end ment ▁legisl ation ▁for ▁the ▁R DA ▁in ▁the ▁first ▁place , ▁is ▁still ▁apparent . ▁However , ▁it ▁seems ▁just ified ▁as ▁real loc ating ▁the ▁courts ▁power ▁to ▁determine ▁such ▁disput es ▁and ▁vest ing ▁it ▁in ▁a ▁trib unal ▁ra ises ▁questions ▁of ▁fair ness . ▁ ▁The ▁final ▁point ▁of ▁constitution al ▁significance ▁ar ising ▁from ▁the ▁case ▁of ▁Br andy ▁is ▁the ▁form