▁suitable ▁for ▁its ▁purpose . ▁( C f . ▁R ort y ' s ▁argument ▁about ▁the ▁purpose ▁and ▁value ▁of ▁philosophy ▁in ▁R ort y ▁( 2 0 0 3 ), ▁" A ▁p rag mat ist ▁view ▁of ▁contemporary ▁analyt ic ▁philosophy ", ▁in ▁E gg inton , ▁W . ▁and ▁Sand bot he , ▁M . ▁( Ed s ), ▁The ▁Prag m atic ▁Turn ▁in ▁Philosoph y , ▁S UN Y ▁Press , ▁New ▁York , ▁NY .) ▁ ▁Ex amples ▁of ▁in ex act ▁daily ▁life ▁concepts ▁in ▁need ▁of ▁exp lication ▁are ▁our ▁concepts ▁of ▁cause ▁and ▁of ▁condition als . ▁Our ▁daily ▁life ▁concept ▁of ▁cause ▁does ▁not ▁distinguish ▁between ▁necessary ▁causes , ▁sufficient ▁causes , ▁complete ▁causes ▁etc . ▁Each ▁of ▁these ▁more ▁precise ▁concepts ▁is ▁an ▁exp lication ▁of ▁our ▁natural ▁concept ▁of ▁cause . ▁ ▁Natural ▁language ▁will ▁only ▁specify ▁truth ▁conditions ▁for ▁propos itions ▁of ▁the ▁form ▁" If ▁p , ▁then ▁q " ▁for ▁situations ▁where ▁" p " ▁is ▁true . ▁( M ost ▁of ▁us ▁probably ▁don ' t ▁have ▁any ▁clear ▁intu itions ▁regarding ▁the ▁truth ▁conditions ▁of ▁the ▁sentence ▁" If ▁I ▁go ▁out ▁in ▁the ▁sun , ▁I ▁will ▁get ▁sun burn ed " ▁in ▁situations ▁where ▁I ▁never ▁go ▁out ▁in ▁the ▁sun .) ▁An ▁exp lication ▁of ▁the ▁conditional ▁will ▁also ▁specify ▁truth ▁conditions ▁for ▁situations ▁where ▁" p " ▁is ▁not ▁true . ▁ ▁Re views ▁of ▁Car nap ' s ▁argument ▁