▁importance ▁that ▁everybody ▁attached ▁to ▁money , ▁and ▁the ▁degree ▁to ▁which ▁the ▁mind ▁had ▁been ▁str essed ▁at ▁the ▁exp ense ▁of ▁the ▁body ; ▁and ▁that ▁what ▁we ▁ought ▁to ▁do ▁was ▁to ▁re - est ab lish ▁personal ▁relationships , ▁the ▁greatest ▁of ▁which ▁was ▁the ▁relationship ▁between ▁a ▁man ▁and ▁a ▁woman ▁in ▁love , ▁in ▁which ▁there ▁was ▁no ▁shame ▁and ▁nothing ▁wrong , ▁nothing ▁un clean , ▁nothing ▁which ▁anybody ▁was ▁not ▁entitled ▁to ▁discuss ." ▁Therefore , ▁the ▁descri ptions ▁of ▁sex ▁were ▁necessary ▁and ▁appropriate . ▁ ▁The ▁defence ▁then ▁called ▁ 3 5 ▁witness es ▁to ▁test ify ▁to ▁the ▁art istic , ▁soci ological ▁and ▁moral ▁value ▁of ▁the ▁book , ▁the ▁pro sec ution ▁called ▁no ▁witness es . ▁ ▁Bishop ▁of ▁W ool wich ▁The ▁defence ▁called ▁Dr ▁John ▁Robinson , ▁the ▁Bishop ▁of ▁W ool wich , ▁to ▁el ic it ▁"[ w ] hat , ▁if ▁any , ▁are ▁the ▁eth ical ▁mer its ▁of ▁this ▁book ?" ▁After ▁ob jection ▁from ▁the ▁pro sec ution ▁on ▁the ▁relev ance ▁of ▁this ▁testim ony ▁the ▁judge ▁agreed ▁it ▁satisfied ▁the ▁" other ▁objects " ▁criter ion ▁of ▁sub section ▁ 2 ▁section ▁ 4 ▁of ▁the ▁Act . ▁Robinson ▁said ▁that ▁while ▁Lawrence ’ s ▁view ▁was ▁not ▁Christian ▁his ▁intention ▁" is ▁to ▁port ray ▁the ▁sex ▁relationship ▁as ▁something ▁essentially ▁sacred ." ▁He ▁continued ▁"... as ▁in ▁a ▁real ▁sense ▁a ▁holy ▁commun ion . ▁For ▁him