▁the ▁case ▁eventually ▁made ▁its ▁way ▁to ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁of ▁California . ▁The ▁just ices ▁pres iding ▁over ▁the ▁case , ▁including ▁Chief ▁Justice ▁Mal col m ▁M . ▁Lucas , ▁ruled ▁in ▁a ▁majority ▁opinion ▁that ▁the ▁restaurant ▁was ▁neg lig ent ▁by ▁leaving ▁the ▁b one ▁in ▁the ▁en ch il ada , ▁which ▁over turn ed ▁the ▁preced ent ▁established ▁in ▁Mix ▁v . ▁In gers oll ▁C andy ▁Co . ▁( 1 9 3 6 ) ▁ 6 ▁Cal . 2 d ▁ 6 7 4 ▁[ 5 9 ▁P . 2 d ▁ 1 4 4 ], ▁a ▁case ▁that ▁set ▁the ▁previous ▁standard ▁for ▁restaurant ▁li ability . ▁Mix ▁v . ▁In gers oll ▁C andy ▁Co . ▁found ▁that ▁restaurant ▁own ers ▁could ▁only ▁be ▁considered ▁neg lig ent ▁if ▁foreign ▁subst ances ▁were ▁left ▁in ▁food , ▁but ▁natural ▁food ▁parts , ▁such ▁as ▁b ones , ▁should ▁be ▁expected . ▁ ▁Leg acy ▁ ▁As ▁a ▁result ▁of ▁this ▁r uling , ▁as ▁well ▁as ▁subsequent ▁r ul ings ▁based ▁on ▁this ▁case , ▁restaur ants ▁and ▁gro c ery ▁stores ▁in ▁California ▁are ▁held ▁account able ▁to ▁str ic ter ▁safety ▁standards — including ▁ins pe ctions — to ▁make ▁food ▁sa fer ▁for ▁customers . ▁ ▁References ▁ ▁Further ▁reading ▁ ▁Text ▁opinion ▁of ▁Mex ical i ▁Rose ▁v . ▁Super ior ▁Court ▁http :// sc ocal . stan ford . edu / op in ion / m ex ical i