▁ 2 0 0 7 , ▁Kevin ▁, ▁a ▁co author ▁of ▁another ▁book ▁on ▁Thomas , ▁remarked ▁that ▁what ▁happened ▁between ▁Thomas ▁and ▁Hill ▁was ▁" ult imately ▁un know able " ▁by ▁others , ▁but ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁clear ▁that ▁" one ▁of ▁them ▁li ed , ▁period ." ▁Writing ▁in ▁ 2 0 0 7 , ▁Neil ▁Lewis ▁of ▁The ▁New ▁York ▁Times ▁remarked ▁that , ▁" To ▁this ▁day , ▁each ▁side ▁in ▁the ▁ep ic ▁he - sa id , ▁she - sa id ▁dispute ▁has ▁its ▁un mov able ▁bel ie vers ." ▁ ▁In ▁ 2 0 0 7 , ▁Thomas ▁published ▁his ▁aut obi ography , ▁My ▁Grand father ' s ▁Son , ▁in ▁which ▁he ▁revis ited ▁the ▁controvers y , ▁calling ▁Hill ▁his ▁" most ▁tra itor ous ▁advers ary " ▁and ▁saying ▁that ▁pro - choice ▁liber als , ▁who ▁fe ared ▁that ▁he ▁would ▁vote ▁to ▁over turn ▁Ro e ▁v . ▁W ade ▁if ▁he ▁were ▁se ated ▁on ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court , ▁used ▁the ▁sc andal ▁against ▁him . ▁He ▁described ▁Hill ▁as ▁touch y ▁and ▁apt ▁to ▁over react , ▁and ▁her ▁work ▁at ▁the ▁E E OC ▁as ▁medi oc re . ▁He ▁acknowled ged ▁that ▁three ▁other ▁former ▁E E OC ▁employees ▁had ▁back ed ▁Hill ' s ▁story , ▁but ▁said ▁they ▁had ▁all ▁left ▁the ▁ag ency ▁on ▁bad ▁terms . ▁He ▁also ▁wrote ▁that ▁Hill ▁" was ▁a ▁left - w inger ▁who