▁as ▁well ▁as ▁signs ). ▁For ▁Go ethe ▁the ▁tur bid ▁medium ▁is ▁the ▁atmosphere ▁( air y ▁real m ), ▁for ▁H ahn emann ▁it ▁is ▁the ▁living ▁organ ism ▁( fl uid ▁or ▁ ether ic ▁real m ). ▁Go ethe ' s ▁inter play ▁of ▁L icht ▁and ▁F inst ern is ▁can ▁also ▁be ▁seen ▁in ▁H ahn emann ' s ▁polar ity ▁between ▁Ge ist ▁( Sp irit ) ▁and ▁W esen ▁( D ynam is ). ▁ ▁The ▁ob jections ▁that ▁Go ethe ▁le ve led ▁against ▁the ▁tax onomy ▁of ▁Lin na eus ▁in ▁bot any ▁can ▁be ▁found ▁in ▁the ▁medical ▁sphere ▁in ▁H ahn emann ' s ▁criticism ▁of ▁the ▁blind ly ▁empir ical ▁or ▁abstract ly ▁intellectual ▁nos ology ▁of ▁his ▁time ▁that ▁took ▁a ▁few ▁outer ▁elements , ▁arbitr arily ▁confl ated ▁them , ▁then ▁conf ounded ▁similarity ▁of ▁appearance ▁here ▁with ▁identity ▁of ▁cause ▁and ▁origin . ▁ ▁H ahn emann ' s ▁criticism ▁also ▁was ▁based ▁on ▁an ▁historical ▁study ▁of ▁the ▁morph ology ▁of ▁this ▁medical ▁state ▁of ▁mind ▁or ▁Kur w esen , ▁much ▁as ▁Go ethe ▁considered ▁the ▁study ▁of ▁history ▁of ▁a ▁phenomen on ▁as ▁a ▁form ▁of ▁knowledge ▁( as ▁did ▁the ▁Gree ks ). ▁Equ ally , ▁H ahn emann ▁was ▁critical ▁of ▁a ▁static ▁approach ▁to ▁disease ▁nos ology , ▁which ▁was ▁constantly ▁shape - sh ifting ▁as ▁the ▁interaction ▁between ▁K rank heit w esen ▁and ▁Menschen w esen ▁expressed ▁different ▁aspects