▁w ip ed ▁away ▁the ▁blood . ▁By ▁ 2 5 ▁March , ▁this ▁conject ure ▁was ▁abandoned . ▁ ▁Despite ▁daily ▁question ing ▁of ▁the ▁neighb ors ▁up ▁to ▁ 2 6 ▁March , ▁an ▁accurate ▁account ▁of ▁the ▁events ▁could ▁not ▁be ▁established ▁because ▁they ▁offered ▁conflic ting ▁information . ▁It ▁was ▁un anim ous ▁that ▁a ▁woman ▁ ▁was ▁either ▁visit ing ▁or ▁living ▁at ▁Good rich ' s ▁house , ▁but ▁little ▁was ▁known ▁about ▁her : ▁ ▁{{ quote | We ▁have ▁very ▁little ▁to ▁work ▁on , ▁and ▁there ▁is ▁nobody ▁to ▁give ▁us ▁anything . ▁If ▁this ▁woman ▁has ▁been ▁visit ing ▁or ▁stopping ▁at ▁the ▁house , ▁as ▁is ▁alleg ed , ▁I ▁should ▁think ▁it ▁not ▁un natural ▁to ▁suppose ▁that ▁somebody ▁should ▁know ▁her ▁name ▁or ▁where ▁she ▁belongs , ▁State ▁or ▁town . ▁Now , ▁I ▁will ▁say ▁em ph atically ▁that ▁there ▁is ▁nobody ▁to ▁give ▁any ▁information ▁of ▁this ▁woman , ▁or ▁where ▁she ▁belongs , ▁not with standing ▁all ▁that ▁has ▁been ▁stated ▁about ▁letters , ▁and ▁all ▁that . ▁No ▁name ▁is ▁known . ▁I ▁wish ▁it ▁was ; ▁the ▁papers ▁would ▁have ▁it ▁mighty ▁quick . || | The ▁New ▁York ▁Times ''' }} ▁ ▁The ▁neighb ours ▁also ▁un anim ously ▁end ors ed ▁the ▁hypothesis ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁murder , ▁and ▁that ▁the ▁woman ▁was ▁" direct ly ▁concerned ▁in ▁the ▁affair ". ▁ ▁R ew ard ▁offer ▁Good rich ' s ▁body ▁was ▁removed