▁F els , ▁and ▁bel ieving ▁he ▁was ▁protect ing ▁Br is elli ' s ▁interests , ▁took ▁it ▁upon ▁himself ▁to ▁write ▁F els ▁a ▁letter ▁( Nov ember ▁ 1 3 ) ▁stating ▁why ▁the ▁viol in ▁part ▁had ▁to ▁under go ▁a ▁" s urg ical ▁operation " ▁by ▁a ▁" special ist " ▁such ▁as ▁himself . ▁He ▁said ▁" The ▁technical ▁emb ell ish ments ▁are ▁very ▁far ▁from ▁the ▁requirements ▁of ▁a ▁modern ▁viol in ist ..." ▁and ▁if ▁Br is elli ▁performed ▁the ▁work ▁as ▁written , ▁it ▁would ▁sever ely ▁hurt ▁his ▁reputation . ▁Me iff ▁said ▁he ▁was ▁re writing ▁the ▁viol in ▁part ▁to ▁make ▁it ▁more ▁acceptable ▁and ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁necessary ▁that ▁he , ▁Br is elli ▁and ▁Bar ber ▁get ▁together ▁for ▁a ▁" special ▁meeting " ▁to ▁discuss ▁his ▁changes . ▁Br is elli ▁was ▁disappoint ed ▁when ▁he ▁received ▁the ▁third ▁movement ▁from ▁Bar ber ▁in ▁late ▁November . ▁He ▁had ▁expected ▁a ▁finale ▁compar able ▁in ▁subst ance ▁and ▁quality ▁to ▁the ▁first ▁two ▁movements , ▁and ▁felt ▁it ▁was ▁too ▁light weight ▁by ▁comparison . ▁He ▁told ▁Bar ber ▁that ▁it ▁did ▁not ▁have ▁a ▁sense ▁of ▁belonging ; ▁it ▁seemed ▁mus ically ▁un related ▁to ▁the ▁first ▁two ▁movements , ▁and ▁he ▁thought ▁it ▁was ▁ins u fficient ▁in ▁compos itional ▁form ▁or ▁development ▁to ▁stand ▁as ▁the ▁finale ▁of ▁a ▁major ▁work . ▁It ▁was ▁important ▁to ▁Br is elli ▁that ▁the ▁commission ▁be