1 0 .) ▁ ▁That ▁the ▁Bill ▁was ▁" ping - p ong ed " ▁between ▁both ▁houses ▁was ▁evidence ▁of ▁an ▁unusual ▁constitution al ▁crisis , ▁notable ▁because ▁the ▁ur gency ▁of ▁the ▁legisl ation ▁– ▁the ▁previous ▁powers ▁to ▁det ain ▁the ▁individuals ▁in ▁H MP ▁Bel mar sh ▁and ▁elsewhere ▁were ▁due ▁to ▁exp ire ▁on ▁ 1 4 ▁March ▁ 2 0 0 5 ▁– ▁meant ▁that ▁the ▁Parliament ▁Act s ▁ 1 9 1 1 ▁and ▁ 1 9 4 9 , ▁the ▁usual ▁device ▁to ▁handle ▁situations ▁where ▁the ▁Commons ▁and ▁L ords ▁cannot ▁agree ▁on ▁a ▁measure , ▁could ▁not ▁be ▁invoked ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁ac quire ▁Royal ▁Ass ent ▁without ▁the ▁consent ▁of ▁the ▁upper ▁house . ▁ ▁Comp rom ise ▁ ▁Event ually , ▁a ▁comprom ise ▁was ▁agreed , ▁with ▁both ▁sides ▁claim ing ▁victory : ▁the ▁opposition ▁parties ▁conced ed ▁all ▁their ▁am end ments ▁for ▁the ▁promise ▁of ▁a ▁review ▁of ▁the ▁legisl ation ▁a ▁year ▁later . ▁The ▁Bill ▁received ▁Royal ▁Ass ent ▁later ▁that ▁day , ▁and ▁the ▁first ▁control ▁orders , ▁to ▁deal ▁with ▁the ▁ten ▁suspect s ▁previously ▁intern ed ▁in ▁H MP ▁Bel mar sh , ▁were ▁issued ▁by ▁Charles ▁Clar ke , ▁the ▁Home ▁Secretary , ▁immediately . ▁ ▁Some ▁critics ▁were ▁still ▁unh appy ▁with ▁the ▁comprom ise ▁reached ▁in ▁the ▁evening ▁of ▁ 1 1 ▁March , ▁pointing ▁out ▁that ▁an ▁Act ▁that ▁removes ▁the ▁ 7 9 0 - year - old