▁decision ▁and ▁ordered ▁that ▁the ▁trial ▁could ▁go ▁ahead . ▁The ▁Pro sec utor ▁was ▁widely ▁critic ised ▁for ▁his ▁actions , ▁but ▁the ▁court ▁was ▁also ▁pra ised ▁for ▁its ▁" det erm ination ▁to ▁ensure ▁fair ness ▁to ▁the ▁defence ". ▁ ▁Human ▁rights ▁groups ▁have ▁expressed ▁their ▁concern ▁about ▁the ▁narrow ▁scope ▁of ▁the ▁charges ▁against ▁Lub anga , ▁and ▁ur ged ▁the ▁Pro sec utor ▁to ▁add ▁more ▁cr imes ▁to ▁the ▁ind ict ment . ▁Several ▁organis ations ▁wrote ▁to ▁the ▁Pro sec utor ▁in ▁ 2 0 0 6 ▁arg uing ▁that ▁" the ▁failure ▁to ▁include ▁additional ▁charges ▁in ▁the ▁case ▁against ▁Mr . ▁Lub anga ▁could ▁under cut ▁the ▁cred ibility ▁of ▁the ▁I CC ▁in ▁the ▁D RC . ▁Moreover , ▁the ▁narrow ▁scope ▁of ▁the ▁current ▁charges ▁may ▁result ▁in ▁sever ely ▁limit ing ▁vict ims ’ ▁participation ▁in ▁the ▁first ▁proceed ings ▁before ▁the ▁I CC . ▁This ▁could ▁neg atively ▁impact ▁on ▁the ▁right ▁of ▁vict ims ▁to ▁re par ations ." ▁ ▁Lub anga ' s ▁lawyer ▁compla ined ▁that ▁the ▁defence ▁team ▁was ▁given ▁a ▁smaller ▁budget ▁than ▁the ▁Pro sec utor , ▁that ▁evidence ▁and ▁witness ▁statements ▁were ▁slow ▁to ▁arrive , ▁and ▁that ▁many ▁documents ▁were ▁so ▁heavily ▁cens ored ▁that ▁they ▁were ▁impossible ▁to ▁read . ▁ ▁References ▁and ▁notes ▁ ▁External ▁links ▁▁ ▁The ▁Pro sec utor ▁v . ▁Thomas ▁Lub anga ▁Dy ilo   — ▁public ▁court ▁records ▁rel ating ▁to ▁the ▁I CC