on ▁and ▁ultimately ▁to ▁New ▁Th ought , ▁and ▁calling ▁the ▁distinct ive ▁Word ▁of ▁Fa ith ▁belief s ▁a ▁her et ical ▁" T ro jan ▁Hor se " ▁in ▁the ▁Christian ▁church . ▁ ▁Mc Con nell ' s ▁repeated ▁this ▁argument ▁in ▁his ▁book , ▁A ▁D ifferent ▁G ospel , ▁in ▁ 1 9 8 8 . ▁ ▁One ▁of ▁Mc Con nell ' s ▁class m ates , ▁D ale ▁H . ▁Sim m ons , ▁published ▁his ▁own ▁doctor al ▁research ▁at ▁D rew ▁University , ▁arg uing ▁that ▁Ken y on ▁was ▁influenced ▁by ▁heter odox ▁met aph ys ical ▁movements ▁and ▁the ▁Fa ith ▁C ure ▁movement ▁of ▁the ▁nin ete enth ▁century . ▁In ▁ 1 9 9 0 , ▁The ▁Ag ony ▁of ▁De ce it ▁survey ed ▁the ▁crit iques ▁of ▁Word ▁of ▁Fa ith ▁do ctr ines . ▁One ▁of ▁the ▁authors , ▁Christian ▁Research ▁Institute ▁founder ▁Walter ▁Martin , ▁issued ▁his ▁personal ▁judgment ▁that ▁Kenneth ▁Cop eland ▁was ▁a ▁false ▁proph et ▁and ▁that ▁the ▁movement ▁as ▁a ▁whole ▁was ▁her et ical . ▁ ▁M ilder ▁critic isms ▁were ▁made ▁by ▁William ▁De Ar te aga ▁in ▁his ▁book ▁Qu en ch ing ▁the ▁Spirit . ▁He ▁conced es ▁some ▁New ▁Th ought ▁influence ▁in ▁Ken y on ' s ▁teaching , ▁but ▁arg ues ▁that ▁Ken y on ' s ▁views ▁helped ▁the ▁church ▁redis cover ▁some ▁bib lic al ▁truth s . ▁Ar gu ing ▁similarly ▁but