▁real istic ▁to ▁maintain ▁the ▁status ▁qu o ▁of ▁limited ▁avail ability ▁of ▁regul atory ▁tri als ▁data ". ▁They ▁were ▁also ▁of ▁the ▁opinion ▁that ▁ade qu ate ▁standards ▁for ▁protection ▁of ▁personal ▁data ▁could ▁be ▁written . ▁However , ▁they ▁war ned ▁that ▁third ▁party ▁re analysis ▁was ▁neither ▁a ▁guarantee ▁of ▁quality ▁nor ▁of ▁lack ▁of ▁conflict ▁of ▁interest , ▁which , ▁in ▁the ▁worst ▁case , ▁could ▁lead ▁to ▁negative ▁public ▁health ▁consequences . ▁ ▁They ▁suggested ▁that ▁re anal ys es ▁should ▁therefore ▁be ▁subject ▁to ▁the ▁same ▁reg ulations ▁as ▁spons or ▁anal ys es , ▁such ▁as ▁register ing ▁analysis ▁plans . ▁They ▁argued ▁against ▁completely ▁un rest rict ed ▁access ▁to ▁data , ▁but ▁in ▁favor ▁of ▁bro ader ▁access . ▁All Tri als ▁is ▁not ▁calling ▁for ▁completely ▁un rest rict ed ▁access ▁to ▁raw ▁data , ▁so ▁the ▁scope ▁of ▁disag re ements ▁is ▁limited ▁to ▁what ▁restrictions ▁should ▁be ▁in ▁place . ▁ ▁Supp or ters ▁ ▁The ▁campaign ▁is ▁an ▁initi ative ▁of ▁S ense ▁About ▁Science , ▁Centre ▁for ▁Ev idence ▁Based ▁Medicine , ▁The ▁D art mouth ▁Institute ▁for ▁Health ▁Policy ▁and ▁C lin ical ▁Pract ice , ▁James ▁Lind ▁Alliance , ▁C och rane ▁Coll abor ation , ▁B M J ▁Group , ▁PL OS , ▁and ▁Bad ▁Science . ▁The ▁pet ition ▁statement ▁of ▁All Tri als ▁has ▁been ▁signed ▁by ▁organizations ▁including ▁Well come ▁Trust , ▁British ▁Library , ▁Medical ▁Research ▁Council ▁( UK ), ▁British