▁w elf are ▁of ▁the ▁community ." ▁ ▁Mil ford ▁had ▁assert ed ▁before ▁the ▁Second ▁Circ uit ▁that ▁it ▁would ▁have ▁allowed ▁a ▁public ▁group ▁to ▁use ▁A es op ' s ▁f ables ▁to ▁im part ▁moral ▁values ▁to ▁children . ▁ ▁Mil ford ▁also ▁allowed ▁the ▁Boy ▁Sc outs ▁to ▁" infl u ence ▁a ▁boy ' s ▁character , ▁development , ▁and ▁spiritual ▁growth ". ▁ ▁Like wise , ▁the ▁Good ▁News ▁Club ▁also ▁sought ▁to ▁teach ▁moral ▁values ▁to ▁children , ▁al beit ▁from ▁an ▁explicitly ▁Christian ▁view point . ▁ ▁According ▁to ▁the ▁majority , ▁the ▁Court ' s ▁prior ▁dec isions ▁in ▁Lamb ' s ▁Chap el ▁and ▁Rosen berger ▁determined ▁the ▁outcome ▁of ▁the ▁Good ▁News ▁Club ' s ▁free ▁speech ▁claim . ▁ ▁In ▁Lamb ' s ▁Chap el , ▁the ▁Court ▁had ▁ruled ▁that ▁a ▁different ▁New ▁York ▁public ▁school ▁had ▁engaged ▁in ▁un const itution al ▁view point ▁disc rim ination ▁when ▁it ▁forb ade ▁a ▁religious ▁group ▁from ▁using ▁its ▁facilities ▁to ▁show ▁films ▁that ▁taught ▁" family ▁values ▁from ▁a ▁Christian ▁perspective ". ▁ ▁It ▁saw ▁no ▁difference ▁between ▁the ▁films ▁that ▁the ▁religious ▁group ▁in ▁Lamb ' s ▁Chap el ▁proposed ▁to ▁show ▁and ▁the ▁songs ▁and ▁less ons ▁the ▁Good ▁News ▁Club ▁used ▁in ▁this ▁case . ▁ ▁And ▁in ▁Rosen berger , ▁the ▁fact ▁that ▁a ▁state ▁university ▁subs id ized ▁the ▁publication ▁of ▁some ▁student ▁newsp apers ▁but ▁refused ▁to ▁subs id ize ▁a ▁student ▁newspaper