1 6 / 1 7 ) ▁found ▁that ▁the ▁impact ▁of ▁priv at isation ▁on ▁communities ▁was ▁negative . ▁ ▁The ▁report ▁from ▁the ▁inqu iry ▁" T aking ▁Back ▁Control " ▁https :// d 3 n 8 a 8 pro 7 v hm x . cloud front . net / c ps u / pages / 1 5 7 3 / attach ments / original / 1 5 0 8 7 1 4 4 4 7 / T aking _ Back _ Control _ F IN AL . pdf ? 1 5 0 8 7 1 4 4 4 7 ▁made ▁a ▁range ▁of ▁recommend ations ▁to ▁provide ▁account ability ▁and ▁trans par ency ▁in ▁the ▁process . ▁ ▁The ▁report ▁highlight ed ▁priv at isation ▁in ▁health care , ▁aged ▁care , ▁child ▁care , ▁social ▁services , ▁government ▁depart ments , ▁electric ity , ▁pr isons ▁and ▁voc ational ▁education ▁featuring ▁the ▁voices ▁of ▁workers , ▁community ▁members ▁and ▁academ ics . ▁▁ ▁Op in ion ▁▁ ▁Arg uments ▁for ▁and ▁against ▁the ▁controvers ial ▁subject ▁of ▁priv at ization ▁are ▁presented ▁here . ▁▁ ▁Support ▁ ▁Studies ▁show ▁that ▁private ▁market ▁factors ▁can ▁more ▁efficiently ▁deliver ▁many ▁goods ▁or ▁service ▁than ▁govern ments ▁due ▁to ▁free ▁market ▁competition . ▁Over ▁time , ▁this ▁tends ▁to ▁lead ▁to ▁lower ▁prices , ▁improved ▁quality , ▁more ▁choices , ▁less ▁cor ruption , ▁less ▁red ▁t ape , ▁and / or ▁quick er ▁delivery . ▁Many ▁pro ponents ▁do ▁not ▁argue ▁that