▁its ▁players ▁void ? ▁ ▁Has ▁W SC ▁established ▁that , ▁as ▁at ▁ 3 ▁August , ▁and ▁subject ▁to ▁any ▁stat ut ory ▁imm unity ▁con ferred ▁by ▁the ▁ 1 9 7 4 ▁Act , ▁it ▁was ▁a ▁good ▁cause ▁of ▁action ▁in ▁tort ▁against ▁the ▁I CC ▁based ▁on ▁indu cement ▁of ▁bre ach ▁of ▁contract ? ▁ ▁Has ▁W SC ▁established ▁that ▁as ▁at ▁ 3 ▁August ▁and ▁subject ▁as ▁a for esa id , ▁it ▁had ▁a ▁good ▁cause ▁of ▁action ▁in ▁tort ▁against ▁the ▁T CC B ▁based ▁on ▁the ▁same ▁grounds ? ▁ ▁Sub ject ▁to ▁the ▁prov isions ▁of ▁the ▁ 1 9 7 4 ▁Act , ▁are ▁the ▁new ▁I CC ▁rules ▁void ▁as ▁being ▁in ▁rest raint ▁of ▁trade ? ▁ ▁Sub ject ▁to ▁a for esa id , ▁are ▁the ▁proposed ▁new ▁T CC B ▁rules ▁void ▁as ▁being ▁in ▁rest raint ▁of ▁trade ? ▁ ▁Is ▁the ▁I CC ▁an ▁employ ers ' ▁association ▁within ▁the ▁ 1 9 7 4 ▁Act ? ▁ ▁Is ▁the ▁T CC B ▁an ▁employ ers ' ▁association ? ▁ ▁If ▁either ▁the ▁I CC ▁or ▁T CC B ▁or ▁both ▁be ▁employ ers ' ▁associations , ▁does ▁this ▁itself ▁bar ▁any ▁cause ▁of ▁action ▁that ▁would ▁otherwise ▁exist ? ▁ ▁In ▁the ▁light ▁of ▁the ▁answers , ▁what ▁relief ▁( if ▁any ) ▁should ▁be ▁given ▁to ▁( a ) ▁the ▁individual ▁pla int iffs ▁and ▁( b ) ▁W SC ? ▁ ▁Justice