r ather ▁than ▁formal ▁psych ol ingu istics ). ▁▁ ▁Dream ▁utter ances ▁plus ▁their ▁dream ▁scenario ▁context s ▁were ▁gathered ▁in ▁a ▁second ▁experiment , ▁again ▁following ▁carefully ▁defined ▁protocol s , ▁this ▁time ▁using ▁the ▁tele phone ▁el ic itation ▁technique . ▁( Vol unte er ▁subjects ▁were ▁aw ak ened ▁on ▁random ▁night s ▁at ▁random ▁hours , ▁on ▁average ▁no ▁more ▁than ▁once ▁a ▁week .) ▁ 7 7 ▁dream ▁reports ▁from ▁ 3 3 ▁subjects ▁were ▁t ape - record ed ▁and ▁trans cribed . ▁These ▁contained ▁ 9 2 ▁dream ▁speech ▁utter ances ▁el ic ited ▁verb at im ▁from ▁the ▁subjects ▁immediately ▁after ▁prov oked ▁aw ak ening ▁( to ▁minim ize ▁d eter ior ation ▁in ▁memory ▁recall ) ▁plus ▁an ▁additional ▁ 1 1 3 ▁utter ances ▁( 8 1 ▁in ▁direct ▁verb at im ▁form , ▁ 3 2 ▁in ▁indirect ▁form ) ▁contained ▁in ▁the ▁subsequent ▁telling ▁of ▁the ▁entire ▁dream . ▁ 4 0 ▁percent ▁of ▁the ▁utter ances ▁were ▁said ▁by ▁the ▁dream er ; ▁ 6 0 ▁percent ▁by ▁someone ▁else ▁in ▁the ▁dream ▁scenario , ▁usually ▁addressed ▁to ▁the ▁dream er ▁( a ▁revers al ▁of ▁the ▁proport ions ▁in ▁the ▁lingu istic ▁performance ▁experiment ). ▁ ▁Five ▁sc or ers , ▁working ▁independently ▁but ▁ach ieving ▁a ▁high ▁degree ▁of ▁inter sc orer ▁reli ability , ▁r ated ▁the ▁appropri aten ess ▁of ▁each ▁of ▁the ▁ 2 0 5 ▁dream s ▁utter ances ▁to ▁their ▁situ