▁a ▁Christian ▁King ▁should ▁conquer ▁a ▁kingdom ▁of ▁an ▁Inf idel , ▁and ▁bring ▁them ▁under ▁his ▁sub jection , ▁there ▁i ps o ▁fact o ▁the ▁La ws ▁of ▁the ▁Inf idel ▁are ▁ab rog ated , ▁for ▁that ▁they ▁be ▁not ▁only ▁against ▁Christian ity , ▁but ▁against ▁the ▁Law ▁of ▁God ▁and ▁of ▁Nature ." ▁( 1 7 0 ). ▁Robert ▁A . ▁Williams ▁Jr . ▁arg ues ▁that ▁Co ke ▁used ▁this ▁occasion ▁to ▁quietly ▁provide ▁a ▁legal ▁san ction ▁for ▁the ▁London ▁Virginia ▁Company ▁to ▁disp ense ▁with ▁aff ording ▁Native ▁Americans ▁any ▁rights ▁as ▁they ▁settled ▁in ▁Virginia . ▁In ▁the ▁E end racht ▁case , ▁King ▁Charles ▁re config ured ▁the ▁r uling ▁for ▁New ▁England . ▁ ▁The ▁test ▁case ▁went ▁to ▁a ▁panel ▁of ▁ 1 4 ▁jud ges ▁drawn ▁from ▁different ▁courts . ▁Two ▁of ▁those ▁diss ented : ▁Sir ▁Thomas ▁F oster ▁( 1 5 4 8 – 1 6 1 2 ) ▁and ▁Sir ▁Thomas ▁Wal ms ley . ▁ ▁Sign ific ance ▁ ▁Post n ati ▁and ▁anten ati ▁ ▁The ▁decision ▁in ▁Cal vin ' s ▁Case ▁h ing ed ▁on ▁Cal vin ' s ▁status ▁as ▁one ▁of ▁the ▁post n ati — subject s ▁born ▁into ▁the ▁alleg iance ▁of ▁the ▁Scottish ▁king ▁James ▁after ▁he ▁had ▁become ▁the ▁king ▁of ▁England ▁in ▁ 1 6 0 3 — and ▁on ▁the ▁fact ▁that ▁the ▁monarch ▁into ▁whose ▁alleg iance ▁he ▁was ▁born ▁( the ▁same ▁James