day ▁behaviour , ▁with ▁the ▁aid ▁of ▁character ▁mask s ; ▁these ▁mask s ▁exist ▁to ▁medi ate ▁conflict . ▁It ▁means ▁that ▁people ▁are ▁obliged ▁or ▁forced ▁to ▁express ▁certain ▁qual ities ▁and ▁repr ess ▁other ▁qual ities ▁in ▁themselves . ▁In ▁doing ▁this , ▁however , ▁their ▁own ▁conscious ness ▁and ▁person ality ▁is ▁alter ed . ▁To ▁be ▁part ▁of ▁an ▁organization , ▁or ▁" r ise ▁to ▁the ▁top " ▁of ▁an ▁organization , ▁they ▁have ▁to ▁be ▁able ▁to ▁" act ▁out " ▁everything ▁that ▁it ▁requires ▁in ▁a ▁convin cing ▁way , ▁and ▁that ▁can ▁only ▁happen ▁if ▁they ▁either ▁have , ▁or ▁ac quire , ▁real ▁characteristics ▁which ▁are ▁at ▁least ▁compatible ▁with ▁it . ▁That ▁requires ▁not ▁just ▁an ▁" acc ult uration " ▁process , ▁but ▁also ▁sufficient ▁behavior al ▁flex ibility , ▁intelligence , ▁ac umen ▁and ▁cre ativity ▁– ▁so ▁that ▁a ▁person ▁does ▁not ▁in app ropri ately ▁" fall ▁out ▁of ▁the ▁role ". ▁Disc ord ▁between ▁identity ▁and ▁function ▁is ▁toler ated ▁only ▁in ▁context s ▁where ▁it ▁does ▁not ▁matter . ▁ ▁In version ▁The ▁fourth ▁step ▁in ▁his ▁argument ▁concerns ▁an ▁in version ▁of ▁subject ▁and ▁object . ▁It ▁is ▁not ▁just ▁that ▁the ▁commercial ▁relationships ▁between ▁things ▁being ▁trad ed ▁begins ▁to ▁domin ate ▁and ▁res hape ▁human ▁behaviour , ▁and ▁re make ▁social ▁relations . ▁In ▁addition , ▁human ▁relations ▁become ▁the ▁property ▁of ▁things . ▁In animate ▁things , ▁and ▁the ▁relationships ▁between ▁them