ough - t ender ▁axis , ▁Ro ke ach ▁also ▁post ulated ▁a ▁basic ▁similarity ▁between ▁commun ism ▁and ▁naz ism , ▁claim ing ▁that ▁these ▁groups ▁would ▁not ▁value ▁freedom ▁as ▁greatly ▁as ▁more ▁conventional ▁social ▁dem ocrat ics , ▁dem ocr atic ▁social ists ▁and ▁capital ists ▁would ▁and ▁he ▁wrote ▁that ▁" the ▁two ▁value ▁model ▁presented ▁here ▁most ▁res emb les ▁E ys en ck ' s ▁hypothesis ". ▁ ▁To ▁test ▁this ▁model , ▁Mil ton ▁Ro ke ach ▁and ▁his ▁colle agues ▁used ▁content ▁analysis ▁on ▁works ▁exempl ifying ▁naz ism ▁( written ▁by ▁Adolf ▁Hitler ), ▁commun ism ▁( written ▁by ▁Vladimir ▁Len in ), ▁capital ism ▁( by ▁Barry ▁Gold water ) ▁and ▁social ism ▁( written ▁by ▁various ▁social ist ▁authors ). ▁This ▁method ▁has ▁been ▁critic ized ▁for ▁its ▁reli ance ▁on ▁the ▁experiment er ' s ▁familiar ity ▁with ▁the ▁content ▁under ▁analysis ▁and ▁its ▁dependence ▁on ▁the ▁research er ' s ▁particular ▁political ▁out look s . ▁ ▁Multiple ▁rat ers ▁made ▁frequency ▁counts ▁of ▁sentences ▁containing ▁syn onym s ▁for ▁a ▁number ▁of ▁values ▁identified ▁by ▁Ro ke ach — including ▁freedom ▁and ▁equality — and ▁Ro ke ach ▁analyz ed ▁these ▁results ▁by ▁comparing ▁the ▁relative ▁frequency ▁rank ings ▁of ▁all ▁the ▁values ▁for ▁each ▁of ▁the ▁four ▁texts : ▁ ▁Social ists ▁( social ism ) ▁— ▁freedom ▁ranked ▁ 1 st , ▁equality ▁ranked ▁ 2 nd ▁ ▁Hitler ▁( N az ism ) ▁– ▁freedom ▁ranked