▁making ▁a ▁conclus ive ▁r uling . ▁ ▁When ▁dealing ▁with ▁r ul ings ▁on ▁Jewish ▁law ▁between ▁entirely ▁different ▁denomin ations ▁( Or th odox ▁vs . ▁Conserv ative , ▁Conserv ative ▁vs . ▁Reform , ▁etc .) ▁it ▁is ▁thus ▁to ▁be ▁expected ▁that ▁significant ▁disag re ements ▁can ▁be ▁found . ▁ ▁As ▁well , ▁there ▁is ▁also ▁a ▁more ▁extreme ▁criticism ▁that ▁that ▁Committee ▁is ▁a ▁failure ▁in ▁being ▁able ▁to ▁balance ▁modern ity ▁and ▁traditional ▁practice . ▁C iting ▁for ▁example ▁the ▁" t ak ana " ▁of ▁driving ▁on ▁Sh abb at ▁for ▁the ▁exclusive ▁purpose ▁of ▁going ▁back ▁and ▁forth ▁to ▁syn agog ue , ▁critics ▁note ▁today ▁few ▁Conserv ative ▁actually ▁just ▁drive ▁to ▁syn agog ue ▁( including ▁the ▁Rab bin ical ▁and ▁L ay ▁leadership ) ▁while ▁some ▁do ▁not ▁drive ▁at ▁all . ▁Mean ing ▁that ▁neither ▁those ▁who ▁drive ▁nor ▁decide ▁to ▁ref rain ▁completely ▁from ▁driving ▁have ▁any ▁revel ancy ▁to ▁the ▁original ▁committee ' s ▁decision , ▁which ▁in ▁effect ▁just ▁allowed ▁the ▁doing ▁whatever ▁the ▁individual ▁member ▁of ▁the ▁movement ▁wanted ▁to ▁do ▁based ▁on ▁everything ▁but ▁the ▁Committee ▁itself . ▁The ▁explanation ▁by ▁many ▁critics ▁that ▁the ▁committee ▁would ▁rather ▁try ▁to ▁please ▁everyone ▁within ▁its ▁broad ▁tent ▁than ▁make ▁a ▁decision ▁that ▁would ▁be ▁considered ▁more ▁correct ▁but ▁in ▁any ▁way ▁controvers ial ▁( th us ▁the ▁wanting ▁to ▁appro ve ▁all ▁sides ▁of ▁all ▁controvers ies .) ▁Also ▁explained ▁as ▁an ▁over emph asis ▁of