▁the ▁ 2 0 1 5 ▁Hugo ▁Awards . ▁The ▁campaign ▁was ▁described ▁as ▁a ▁back l ash ▁against ▁the ▁increasing ▁ra cial , ▁eth nic , ▁and ▁gender ▁divers ity ▁in ▁science ▁fiction . ▁M embers ▁of ▁the ▁b loc ▁said ▁that ▁they ▁sought ▁to ▁counter act ▁what ▁they ▁saw ▁as ▁a ▁focus ▁on ▁giving ▁awards ▁based ▁on ▁the ▁race , ▁eth nic ity , ▁or ▁gender ▁of ▁the ▁author ▁or ▁characters ▁rather ▁than ▁quality , ▁and ▁bem o an ing ▁the ▁increasing ▁prom in ence ▁of ▁what ▁they ▁described ▁as ▁' message ' ▁fiction ▁with ▁fewer ▁traditional ▁" z ap ▁gun " ▁science - f ict ional ▁tra ppings . ▁By ▁ 2 0 1 8 , ▁the ▁Sad ▁Pu pp ies ▁had ▁dimin ished ▁visibility , ▁and ▁Qu inn ' s ▁ 2 0 1 7 ▁mem oir , ▁Cr ash ▁Over ride : ▁How ▁G amer gate ▁( N ear ly ) ▁Dest roy ed ▁My ▁Life , ▁and ▁How ▁We ▁Can ▁Win ▁the ▁Fight ▁Again st ▁Online ▁H ate , ▁was ▁nominated ▁for ▁the ▁ 2 0 1 8 ▁Hugo ▁Award ▁for ▁Best ▁Rel ated ▁Work ▁( for ▁non - f iction ▁works ▁related ▁to ▁science ▁fiction ▁or ▁fant asy ). ▁ ▁Eth ics ▁in ▁journal ism ▁compla ints ▁The ▁most ▁active ▁G amer gate ▁supp or ters ▁or ▁" G amer g aters " ▁said ▁that ▁G amer gate ▁was ▁a ▁movement ▁for ▁eth ics ▁in ▁games ▁journal ism ▁and ▁for ▁protect ing ▁the ▁" g amer