▁femin ine . ▁While ▁widely ▁perce ived ▁at ▁the ▁time ▁as ▁an ▁attack ▁on ▁the ▁Ang lo - American ▁approach , ▁Mo i ▁would ▁later ▁highlight ▁her ▁respect ▁for ▁their ▁more ▁polit ic ized ▁st ance , ▁as ▁opposed ▁to ▁the ▁ideal ism ▁of ▁the ▁post - struct ural ists . ▁The ▁book ▁would ▁also ▁explore ▁the ▁concept ▁of ▁and rog yn y , ▁along ▁with ▁its ▁links ▁to ▁the ▁anti - ess ential ism ▁of ▁the ▁French ▁school . ▁ ▁Sex ual / Text ual ▁Polit ics ▁was ▁followed ▁by ▁further ▁expl or ations ▁of ▁contemporary ▁French ▁femin ists ▁such ▁as ▁Julia ▁Kr iste va , ▁before ▁Mo i ▁turned ▁to ▁her ▁ground - bre aking ▁ 1 9 9 8 ▁study ▁of ▁Sim one ▁de ▁Beau voir . ▁Over ▁the ▁following ▁de cade , ▁however , ▁her ▁focus ▁of ▁attention ▁shift ed ▁to ▁ordinary ▁language ▁philosophy ▁from ▁exist ential ism . ▁Her ▁most ▁recent ▁book , ▁Revolution ▁of ▁the ▁Ord inary : ▁Liter ary ▁Studies ▁after ▁W itt gen stein , ▁Austin , ▁and ▁Cav ell ▁( 2 0 1 7 ), ▁art icul ates ▁an ▁ordinary ▁language ▁philosophy - in sp ired ▁approach ▁to ▁the ▁task ▁of ▁literary ▁criticism . ▁The ▁book ▁has ▁been ▁pra ised ▁by ▁critics ▁such ▁as ▁R ita ▁Fel ski , ▁R . M . ▁Ber ry , ▁Robert ▁Pi pp in , ▁and ▁John ▁Gib son . ▁Writing ▁in ▁the ▁Los ▁Angeles ▁Review ▁of ▁Books , ▁V . ▁Josh ua ▁Adams ▁claims ▁that ▁Mo i