▁those ▁opinions ▁have ▁been ▁critical ▁of ▁not ▁only ▁Oliver ▁but ▁H ester . ▁ ▁In ▁a ▁ 2 0 1 7 ▁conc urr ing ▁opinion ▁where ▁the ▁doctrine ▁did ▁not ▁come ▁into ▁play ▁in ▁over turn ing ▁a ▁Wisconsin ▁far mer ' s ▁conv ict ions ▁for ▁threaten ing ▁two ▁state ▁game ▁w ard ens ▁he ▁believed ▁had ▁been ▁illegal ▁hun ters ▁tres pass ing ▁on ▁his ▁land , ▁Justice ▁Reb e cca ▁Gr ass l ▁of ▁that ▁state ' s ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁was ▁highly ▁critical ▁of ▁it . ▁ ▁State ▁v . ▁D ix son ▁ ▁Within ▁a ▁year ▁of ▁Oliver , ▁deput y ▁sh er iffs ▁in ▁Co os ▁County , ▁Oregon , ▁followed ▁up ▁on ▁a ▁tip ▁that ▁mar iju ana ▁was ▁being ▁grown ▁on ▁a ▁local ▁l umber ▁company ' s ▁land . ▁After ▁flying ▁over ▁the ▁property ▁in ▁question ▁and ▁obser ving ▁possible ▁gro ves ▁of ▁the ▁plant , ▁then ▁seeing ▁a ▁tr uck ▁carrying ▁water ▁onto ▁the ▁property ▁via ▁a ▁private ▁access ▁road , ▁the ▁deput ies ▁followed ▁the ▁road , ▁past ▁a ▁cable ▁stretch ed ▁across ▁it , ▁signs ▁prohib iting ▁hunting ▁on ▁the ▁property , ▁and ▁a ▁fel led ▁tree , ▁past ▁which ▁they ▁had ▁to ▁proceed ▁on ▁foot ▁to ▁a ▁dwell ing ▁at ▁the ▁center ▁of ▁the ▁ ▁of ▁forest . ▁From ▁the ▁dwell ing ▁they ▁were ▁able ▁to ▁see ▁can nab is ▁plant ed ▁ ▁away , ▁outside ▁the ▁cur til age ▁of ▁the ▁house . ▁The ▁couple ▁who ▁were ▁in ▁the ▁process