▁of ▁South west ▁Airlines ▁was ▁not ▁in ▁viol ation ▁of ▁the ▁Americans ▁with ▁Dis abilities ▁Act , ▁because ▁the ▁A DA ▁is ▁concerned ▁with ▁things ▁with ▁a ▁physical ▁existence ▁and ▁thus ▁cannot ▁be ▁applied ▁to ▁cy bers pace . ▁Judge ▁Pat ric ia ▁A . ▁Se itz ▁found ▁that ▁the ▁" virtual ▁ticket ▁counter " ▁of ▁the ▁website ▁was ▁a ▁virtual ▁construct , ▁and ▁hence ▁not ▁a ▁" public ▁place ▁of ▁accommod ation ." ▁As ▁such , ▁" To ▁expand ▁the ▁A DA ▁to ▁cover ▁' virtual ' ▁spaces ▁would ▁be ▁to ▁create ▁new ▁rights ▁without ▁well - defined ▁standards ." ▁ ▁O uel lette ▁v . ▁Via com ▁International ▁Inc . ▁ ▁O uel lette ▁v . ▁Via com ▁International ▁Inc . ▁followed ▁in ▁Access ▁Now ' s ▁foot steps ▁by ▁holding ▁that ▁a ▁mere ▁online ▁presence ▁does ▁not ▁subject ▁a ▁website ▁to ▁the ▁A DA ▁gu idel ines . ▁Thus ▁Mys pace ▁and ▁YouTube ▁were ▁not ▁li able ▁for ▁a ▁d ys lex ic ▁man ' s ▁in ability ▁to ▁navigate ▁the ▁site ▁regardless ▁of ▁how ▁impress ive ▁the ▁" online ▁the ater " ▁is . ▁ ▁Auth ors ▁Gu ild ▁v . ▁H ath i Tr ust ▁Auth ors ▁Gu ild ▁v . ▁H ath i Tr ust ▁was ▁a ▁case ▁in ▁which ▁the ▁District ▁Court ▁decided ▁that ▁the ▁H ath i Tr ust ▁digital ▁library ▁was ▁a ▁transform ative , ▁fair ▁use ▁of ▁copy right ed ▁works , ▁making ▁a ▁large ▁number ▁of ▁written ▁text ▁available ▁to ▁those ▁with