▁for ▁the ▁children ▁now , ▁rather ▁than ▁at ▁some ▁stage ▁in ▁the ▁future ." ▁ ▁App e als ▁Up ▁to ▁this ▁point , ▁the ▁hear ings ▁had ▁been ▁held ▁almost ▁entirely ▁in ▁private . ▁The ▁publication ▁of ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁jud g ments ▁was ▁stayed ▁until ▁appe als ▁by ▁She ikh ▁Moh ammed ▁contest ing ▁the ▁publication ▁of ▁the ▁jud g ments ▁had ▁been ▁heard ▁by ▁the ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al ▁and ▁the ▁UK ▁Supreme ▁Court . ▁His ▁appeal ▁was ▁rejected ▁un anim ously ▁by ▁the ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al . ▁ ▁On ▁ 5 ▁March ▁ 2 0 2 0 , ▁the ▁UK ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁refused ▁She ikh ▁Moh ammed ▁permission ▁to ▁make ▁an ▁appeal ▁against ▁publication ▁of ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁jud g ments ▁of ▁ 1 1 ▁December ▁ 2 0 1 9 ▁and ▁ 1 7 ▁January ▁ 2 0 2 0 , ▁saying ▁his ▁case ▁did ▁" not ▁raise ▁an ▁arg u able ▁point ▁of ▁law ▁of ▁general ▁public ▁importance ". ▁ ▁Find ings ▁of ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁On ▁ 5 ▁March ▁ 2 0 2 0 , ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁found ▁that ▁She ikh ▁Moh ammed ▁had ▁orch estr ated ▁the ▁ab du ctions ▁of ▁two ▁of ▁his ▁other ▁children . ▁Using ▁the ▁standard ▁of ▁evidence ▁in ▁civil ▁cases ▁( bal ance ▁of ▁prob abilities , ▁that ▁is ▁that ▁it ▁is ▁more ▁likely ▁than ▁not ▁to ▁be ▁true ) ▁rather ▁than ▁the ▁criminal ▁law ▁standard ▁of ▁beyond ▁all ▁reasonable ▁doubt , ▁the ▁President ▁of ▁the ▁Family