▁K art alin sky ▁District ▁of ▁Ch ely ab in sk ▁O blast , ▁Russia ▁is ▁incorpor ated ▁as <0x0A> </s> ▁City ▁and ▁West min ster ▁Properties ▁( 1 9 3 4 ) ▁Ltd ▁v ▁M ud d ▁[ 1 9 5 9 ] ▁Ch ▁ 1 2 9 ▁is ▁an ▁English ▁contract ▁law ▁case , ▁regarding ▁the ▁par ol ▁evidence ▁rule . ▁It ▁illustr ates ▁one ▁of ▁the ▁large ▁exceptions , ▁that ▁a ▁written ▁document ▁is ▁not ▁de emed ▁to ▁be ▁exhaust ive ▁of ▁the ▁parties ▁intent ions ▁when ▁there ▁is ▁clear ▁evidence ▁of ▁a ▁coll ater al ▁contract . ▁It ▁shows ▁that ▁even ▁evidence ▁from ▁outside ▁a ▁written ▁agreement ▁may ▁contradict ▁evidence ▁inside ▁it . ▁ ▁Fact s ▁The ▁le ase ▁said ▁the ▁ten ant ▁could ▁use ▁No ▁ 4 ▁New ▁Cav end ish ▁Street , ▁London , ▁for ▁business ▁purposes ▁only . ▁Mr ▁M ud d , ▁the ▁ten ant ▁was ▁an ▁ant ique ▁deal er . ▁He ▁had ▁been ▁assured ▁he ▁could ▁live ▁in ▁the ▁back ▁room ▁of ▁the ▁shop ▁and ▁using ▁the ▁bas ement ▁a ▁living ▁space ▁as ▁a ▁w art ime ▁arrangement ▁since ▁ 1 9 4 1 . ▁The ▁written ▁agre ements ▁followed ▁from ▁ 1 9 4 3 ▁and ▁ex cluded ▁using ▁the ▁prem ises ▁to ▁live ▁since ▁ 1 9 4 7 . ▁In ▁ 1 9 5 7 , ▁after ▁some ▁changes ▁of ▁land l ord ▁and ▁ca ution ▁of ▁survey ors , ▁the ▁new ▁land l ord ▁tried ▁to ▁e ject ▁Mr