▁from ▁their ▁houses ▁and ▁jobs , ▁threatened , ▁or ▁ab used , ▁it ▁makes ▁G amer gate ' s ▁claim ▁that ▁it ▁is ▁engaged ▁in ▁an ▁eth ical ▁campaign ▁appear ▁laugh able ." ▁The ▁campaign ' s ▁focus ▁bro aden ed ▁to ▁take ▁on ▁other ▁targets ▁in ▁the ▁news ▁media , ▁as ▁with ▁H ulk ▁Hog an ' s ▁law suit ▁against ▁G aw ker ▁Media . ▁ ▁J esse ▁Sing al , ▁in ▁New ▁York , ▁stated ▁that ▁he ▁had ▁spoken ▁to ▁several ▁G amer gate ▁supp or ters ▁to ▁try ▁to ▁understand ▁their ▁concerns , ▁but ▁found ▁conflic ting ▁ide als ▁and ▁in co her ent ▁messages . ▁Sing al ▁observed ▁G amer gate ▁supp or ters ▁making ▁a ▁constant ▁series ▁of ▁attacks ▁on ▁Qu inn , ▁Sar ke esian , ▁and ▁other ▁people , ▁while ▁frequently ▁stating ▁that ▁G amer gate ▁" is ▁not ▁about " ▁them . ▁Chris ▁I p ▁of ▁the ▁Columbia ▁Journal ism ▁Review ▁said ▁that ▁G amer gate ▁supp or ters ▁esp ous ing ▁crit iques ▁of ▁eth ics ▁in ▁journal ism ▁could ▁not ▁be ▁separated ▁from ▁har ass ers . ▁With ▁anyone ▁able ▁to ▁twe et ▁under ▁the ▁has ht ag ▁and ▁no ▁single ▁person ▁willing ▁or ▁able ▁to ▁represent ▁the ▁has ht ag ▁and ▁take ▁responsibility ▁for ▁its ▁actions , ▁I p ▁said ▁it ▁is ▁not ▁possible ▁for ▁journal ists ▁to ▁neat ly ▁separate ▁ab users ▁from ▁those ▁seeking ▁reasonable ▁debate . ▁ ▁Jon ▁Stone ▁wrote ▁in ▁The ▁Guardian ▁that ▁ ▁read just s