▁Sl ug ger ▁Awards . ▁The ▁information ▁had ▁been ▁part ▁of ▁a ▁government - se aled ▁report ▁detail ing ▁ 1 0 4 ▁major ▁league ▁players ▁( out ▁of ▁ 1 2 0 0 ▁players ▁tested ) ▁who ▁tested ▁positive ▁for ▁performance ▁enh anc ers ▁during ▁a ▁ 2 0 0 3 ▁drug ▁survey . ▁Appro ved ▁by ▁the ▁players ▁themselves ▁with ▁the ▁promise ▁of ▁an onym ity , ▁the ▁survey ▁was ▁conducted ▁by ▁Major ▁League ▁Baseball ▁to ▁see ▁whether ▁a ▁mand atory ▁drug ▁testing ▁program ▁might ▁be ▁necessary . ▁At ▁the ▁time , ▁as ▁the ▁result ▁of ▁a ▁collect ively ▁b arg ained ▁union ▁agreement , ▁there ▁was ▁no ▁penalty ▁or ▁pun ishment ▁for ▁a ▁positive ▁test . ▁Because ▁more ▁than ▁ 5 % ▁of ▁the ▁samples ▁taken ▁from ▁players ▁in ▁ 2 0 0 3 ▁came ▁back ▁positive , ▁mand atory ▁testing ▁of ▁major ▁league ▁baseball ▁players ▁began ▁in ▁ 2 0 0 4 , ▁with ▁pen alt ies ▁for ▁viol ations . ▁ ▁The ▁ 2 0 0 3 ▁test ▁results ▁were ▁supposed ▁to ▁remain ▁anonymous ▁and ▁the ▁samples ▁destroyed . ▁However , ▁a ▁c oded ▁master ▁list ▁of ▁ 1 0 4 ▁players ▁was ▁seized ▁during ▁the ▁B AL CO ▁investigation , ▁turning ▁up ▁in ▁a ▁ 2 0 0 4 ▁federal ▁ra id ▁on ▁Com pre h ensive ▁D rug ▁Test ing ' s ▁facility ▁in ▁Long ▁Beach , ▁California . ▁A ▁month ▁later , ▁the ▁physical ▁samples ▁were ▁seized ▁by ▁federal ▁agents ▁ra iding ▁Qu est ▁Di