▁charges ▁made ▁by ▁Nas he ▁in ▁Pier ce ' s ▁super er og ation , ▁or ▁a ▁New ▁P ray se ▁of ▁the ▁Old ▁As se ▁( 1 5 9 3 ). ▁In ▁a ▁religious ▁work , ▁Christ s ▁T ear es ▁over ▁Jerusalem ▁( 1 5 9 3 ) ▁Nas he ▁made ▁a ▁full ▁ap ology ▁to ▁Har vey , ▁who ▁however ▁res umed ▁the ▁controvers y ▁in ▁a ▁New ▁Let ter ▁of ▁Notable ▁Cont ents ▁( 1 5 9 3 ). ▁Har vey ▁probably ▁had ▁not ▁seen ▁Nas he ' s ▁ap ology ▁in ▁print ▁when ▁he ▁wrote ▁the ▁New ▁Let ter ▁of ▁Notable ▁Cont ents , ▁but ▁he ▁knew ▁something ▁along ▁those ▁lines ▁was ▁rum oured . ▁He ▁refused ▁to ▁take ▁reports ▁of ▁Nas he ' s ▁change ▁of ▁heart ▁at ▁face ▁value ▁until ▁he ▁had ▁the ▁proof ▁in ▁black ▁and ▁white : ▁ ▁" T ill ▁a ▁public ▁injury ▁be ▁public ly ▁conf essed , ▁and ▁print ▁conf uted ▁in ▁print , ▁I ▁am ▁one ▁of ▁St . ▁Thomas ' ▁dis ci ples , ▁not ▁over ▁prest ▁to ▁believe ..." ▁▁ ▁This ▁certainly ▁sounds ▁as ▁if ▁Har vey ▁had ▁simply ▁not ▁seen ▁a ▁copy ▁of ▁Christ s ▁T ear es ▁at ▁the ▁time ▁of ▁writing ▁New ▁Let ter . ▁Nas he ▁dram atically ▁with d rew ▁his ▁ap ology ▁in ▁a ▁new ▁edition ▁( 1 5 9 5 ) ▁of ▁Christ es ▁T ear es . ▁Har vey , ▁he ▁claimed , ▁had ▁hint ed ▁at ▁wanting ▁a ▁recon