▁I ▁am "), ▁and ▁from ▁this ▁" ins ight " ▁Des cart es ▁drew ▁conclus ions ▁about ▁God , ▁the ▁world , ▁and ▁knowledge . ▁According ▁to ▁Fou ca ult , ▁since ▁Des cart es ▁knowledge ▁has ▁been ▁something ▁separate ▁from ▁eth ics . ▁In ▁modern ▁times , ▁Fou ca ult ▁arg ues , ▁anyone ▁can ▁reach ▁" know ledge ", ▁as ▁long ▁as ▁they ▁are ▁rational ▁be ings , ▁educated , ▁willing ▁to ▁particip ate ▁in ▁the ▁scientific ▁community ▁and ▁use ▁a ▁scientific ▁method . ▁Fou ca ult ▁is ▁critical ▁of ▁this ▁" mod ern " ▁view ▁of ▁knowledge . ▁ ▁Fou ca ult ▁describes ▁two ▁types ▁of ▁" know ledge ": ▁" s avoir " ▁and ▁" con na issance ", ▁two ▁French ▁terms ▁that ▁both ▁can ▁be ▁translated ▁as ▁" know ledge " ▁but ▁with ▁separate ▁mean ings ▁for ▁Fou ca ult . ▁By ▁" s avoir " ▁Fou ca ult ▁is ▁referring ▁to ▁a ▁process ▁where ▁subjects ▁are ▁created , ▁while ▁at ▁the ▁same ▁time ▁these ▁subjects ▁also ▁become ▁objects ▁for ▁knowledge . ▁An ▁example ▁of ▁this ▁can ▁be ▁seen ▁in ▁cr imin ology ▁and ▁psych iat ry . ▁In ▁these ▁sciences , ▁subjects ▁such ▁as ▁" the ▁rational ▁person ", ▁" the ▁ment ally ▁ill ▁person ", ▁" the ▁law ▁ab iding ▁person ", ▁" the ▁criminal ", ▁etc . ▁are ▁created , ▁and ▁these ▁sciences ▁center ▁their ▁attention ▁and ▁knowledge ▁on ▁these ▁subjects . ▁The ▁knowledge ▁about ▁these ▁subjects ▁is ▁" con na ic ance ", ▁while