▁back ▁to ▁the ▁ag ency , ▁it ▁almost ▁always ▁involves ▁an ▁additional ▁notice ▁and ▁public ▁comment ▁period . ▁ ▁Ex ceed s ▁stat ut ory ▁authority . ▁Fre qu ently , ▁oppon ents ▁of ▁a ▁rule ▁argue ▁that ▁it ▁fails ▁to ▁follow ▁the ▁instructions ▁of ▁the ▁author izing ▁legisl ation . ▁R ules ▁can ▁be ▁found ▁to ▁exceed ▁stat ut ory ▁authority ▁if ▁they ▁are ▁too ▁strict ▁or ▁too ▁la x . ▁ ▁If ▁a ▁law ▁instruct s ▁an ▁ag ency ▁to ▁issue ▁reg ulations ▁to ▁ban ▁a ▁chemical , ▁but ▁the ▁ag ency ▁issues ▁a ▁rule ▁that ▁instead ▁sets ▁levels ▁for ▁safe ▁use — or ▁vice ▁vers a — a ▁court ▁may ▁order ▁the ▁ag ency ▁to ▁issue ▁a ▁new ▁rule . ▁ ▁Bol t ▁out ▁of ▁the ▁blue . ▁Occ asion ally , ▁interested ▁parties ▁argue ▁that ▁the ▁final ▁rule ▁contains ▁prov isions ▁that ▁were ▁never ▁v ett ed ▁during ▁the ▁public ▁comment ▁period . ▁A ▁court ▁may ▁interven e ▁if ▁it ▁finds ▁that ▁there ▁was ▁no ▁way ▁that ▁the ▁comment ing ▁public ▁could ▁have ▁anticip ated ▁the ▁new ▁prov isions ▁and ▁provided ▁comments . ▁If ▁so , ▁the ▁new ▁prov isions ▁are ▁said ▁to ▁be , ▁in ▁a ▁color ful ▁legal ▁phrase , ▁a ▁' bol t ▁out ▁of ▁the ▁blue ' ▁rather ▁than ▁a ▁reasonable ▁course ▁correction ▁during ▁the ▁rule making ▁process . ▁ ▁Fre qu ently , ▁ag encies ▁will ▁v et ▁several ▁options ▁during ▁the ▁proposed ▁rule ▁phase ▁to ▁allow ▁for ▁comment ▁on ▁the ▁full ▁spectrum ▁of