1 9 8 0 ] ▁ 1 ▁Q B ▁ 6 7 7 ▁has ▁been ▁described ▁as ▁" the ▁Don og h ue ▁v ▁Stevens on ▁of ▁rest itution ▁for ▁mistake ." ▁ ▁It ▁has ▁also ▁been ▁stated ▁that ▁S lade ' s ▁Case ▁" could ▁be ▁said ▁to ▁ ▁be ▁the ▁Don og h ue ▁v . ▁Stevens on ▁of ▁contract ." ▁ ▁Similarly , ▁ ▁has ▁been ▁called ▁" the ▁Don og h ue ▁v ▁Stevens on ▁of ▁Tour ism ▁Law ". ▁ ▁Comm em oration ▁ ▁In ▁ 1 9 9 0 , ▁a ▁pil gr image ▁to ▁P ais ley ▁was ▁organ ised ▁by ▁the ▁Canadian ▁Bar ▁Association , ▁the ▁Fac ulty ▁of ▁Adv oc ates ▁and ▁the ▁Law ▁Society ▁of ▁Scotland . ▁This ▁included ▁a ▁conference ▁in ▁P ais ley ▁Town ▁Hall ▁entitled ▁" The ▁Pil gr image ▁to ▁P ais ley : ▁a ▁Sal ute ▁to ▁Don og h ue ▁v ▁Stevens on ". ▁A ▁mem orial ▁comm emor ating ▁the ▁case ▁was ▁un ve iled ▁at ▁the ▁conference ▁on ▁the ▁site ▁of ▁the ▁former ▁Well me adow ▁C afé ▁and ▁a ▁ben ch ▁was ▁added ▁in ▁ 1 9 9 2 ; ▁both ▁were ▁replaced ▁in ▁ 2 0 1 2 . ▁ ▁In ▁ 1 9 9 6 , ▁Justice ▁Martin ▁Taylor ▁produced ▁a ▁document ary ▁on ▁the ▁case : ▁The ▁P ais ley ▁Sn ail . ▁ ▁Ex istence ▁of ▁the ▁sn ail ▁ ▁In ▁a ▁speech ▁scheduled ▁to ▁be ▁delivered ▁in ▁May ▁