▁Comple t us ▁( I , ▁cols . ▁ 5 - 2 4 2 ). ▁In ▁this ▁work , ▁Bon fr ère ▁de als ▁with ▁subjects ▁per tain ing ▁to ▁the ▁Bible ▁as ▁a ▁whole . ▁His ▁selection ▁and ▁treatment ▁of ▁topics ▁was ▁largely ▁determined ▁by ▁the ▁controvers ies ▁of ▁the ▁time ▁regarding ▁the ▁value ▁of ▁the ▁V ul gate , ▁the ▁obsc urity ▁of ▁Script ure , ▁etc . ▁The ▁historical ▁methods ▁now ▁applied ▁to ▁the ▁canon ▁text , ▁and ▁herm ene ut ics ▁of ▁Sac red ▁Script ure ▁were ▁not ▁known ▁in ▁his ▁time . ▁He ▁de als ▁with ▁insp iration ▁in ▁one ▁chapter ▁( ch . ▁v iii : ▁De ▁modo ▁qu o ▁De us ▁cum ▁his ce ▁S criptor ibus ▁h agi ograph is ▁hab uit ). ▁The ▁views ▁he ▁sets ▁forth ▁here ▁do ▁not ▁in ▁all ▁respect s ▁agree ▁with ▁the ▁teach ings ▁of ▁modern ▁Catholic ▁the olog ians . ▁He ▁holds , ▁for ▁instance , ▁that ▁appro val ▁of ▁a ▁writing ▁by ▁God , ▁subsequent ▁to ▁its ▁composition , ▁would ▁suff ice ▁to ▁make ▁it ▁canonical . ▁In ▁point ▁of ▁fact , ▁though , ▁he ▁ass ures ▁us , ▁no ▁book ▁of ▁the ▁Bible ▁was ▁so ▁composed . ▁He ▁then ▁express es ▁the ▁opinion ▁that ▁when ▁writing ▁on ▁what ▁they ▁knew ▁without ▁revel ation , ▁the ▁sacred ▁authors ▁only ▁had ▁the ▁assistance ▁necessary ▁to ▁preserve ▁them ▁from ▁error . ▁He ▁does ▁not ▁make ▁a ▁clear ▁distinction ▁between ▁insp iration ▁and ▁revel ation . ▁( See ▁P esch