" ▁or ▁" M ah ā y ā na " ▁teach ings . ▁ ▁To ▁identify ▁entire ▁schools ▁as ▁" H ī n ay ā na " ▁that ▁contained ▁not ▁only ▁ś r ā v ak as ▁and ▁pr aty ek ab ud d has ▁but ▁also ▁Mah ā y ā na ▁bod his att vas ▁would ▁be ▁attack ing ▁the ▁schools ▁of ▁their ▁fellow ▁Mah ā y ā n ists ▁as ▁well ▁as ▁their ▁own . ▁Instead , ▁what ▁is ▁demonstrated ▁in ▁the ▁definition ▁of ▁H ī n ay ā na ▁given ▁by ▁Y ij ing ▁is ▁that ▁the ▁term ▁referred ▁to ▁individuals ▁based ▁on ▁do ctr inal ▁differences . ▁ ▁H ī n ay ā na ▁as ▁Ś r ā v ak ay ā na ▁ ▁Sch olar ▁Isabel le ▁O ni ans ▁as ser ts ▁that ▁although ▁" the ▁Mah ā y ā na ▁... ▁very ▁occasionally ▁referred ▁ ▁to ▁earlier ▁Buddh ism ▁as ▁the ▁Hin ay ā na , ▁the ▁In fer ior ▁Way , ▁[...] ▁the ▁pre ponder ance ▁of ▁this ▁name ▁in ▁the ▁secondary ▁literature ▁is ▁far ▁out ▁of ▁proportion ▁to ▁occurr ences ▁in ▁the ▁Indian ▁texts ." ▁She ▁notes ▁that ▁the ▁term ▁Ś r ā v ak ay ā na ▁was ▁" the ▁more ▁polit ically ▁correct ▁and ▁much ▁more ▁usual " ▁term ▁used ▁by ▁Mah ā y ā n ists . ▁Jonathan ▁Sil k ▁has ▁argued ▁that ▁the ▁term ▁" H in ay ana " ▁was ▁used ▁to ▁refer ▁to ▁wh ome ver ▁one ▁wanted