▁Schne iders , ▁who ▁during ▁her ▁studies ▁in ▁J ena ▁in ▁the ▁years ▁ 2 0 0 0 ▁and ▁ 2 0 0 1 , ▁according ▁to ▁her ▁own ▁information , ▁was ▁a ▁member ▁of ▁the ▁N PD ▁" for ▁a ▁short ▁time ", ▁because ▁she ▁was ▁of ▁the ▁opinion ▁that ▁" a ▁def ensive ▁dem ocracy ▁does ▁not ▁need ▁a ▁party ▁ban ". ▁While ▁W ohl leben ▁at ▁that ▁time ▁was ▁district ▁chairman , ▁Schne iders ▁held ▁the ▁office ▁of ▁deput y ▁district ▁chairman ▁and ▁should ▁also ▁have ▁had ▁contacts ▁with ▁the ▁free ▁com r ades hip ▁scene . ▁In ▁addition , ▁Schne iders ▁was ▁active ▁until ▁its ▁prohib ition ▁in ▁the ▁aid ▁organization ▁for ▁national ▁political ▁prisoners ▁and ▁their ▁relatives ▁( H NG ). ▁The ▁law ▁firm ▁Har sch ▁and ▁colle agues ▁pron ounced ▁the ▁term ination ▁to ▁Schne iders ▁in ▁December ▁ 2 0 1 1 , ▁due ▁to ▁" the ▁enorm ous ▁public ▁pressure ". ▁W ohl leben ▁is ▁represented ▁next ▁to ▁Schne iders ▁by ▁the ▁C ott bus ▁lawyer ▁O la f ▁K lem ke , ▁a ▁third ▁mand atory ▁lawyer ▁rejected ▁the ▁Mun ich ▁court . ▁ ▁From ▁ 6 ▁May ▁ 2 0 1 3 ▁W ohl leben ▁had ▁to ▁answer ▁in ▁court ▁in ▁the ▁NS U ▁trial . ▁After ▁it ▁became ▁known ▁that ▁the ▁main ▁def endant ▁Be ate ▁Z sch ä pe ▁wanted ▁to ▁get ▁involved ▁in ▁the ▁alleg ations ▁in ▁December ▁ 2 0 1 5 , ▁W ohl leben ' s ▁law