▁was ▁printed ▁in ▁ 1 7 6 8 . ▁" Of ▁In j uries ▁ar ising ▁from ▁Neg lig ence ▁or ▁Fol ly . ▁Every ▁man ▁ought ▁to ▁take ▁reasonable ▁care ▁that ▁he ▁does ▁not ▁inj ure ▁his ▁neighbour ; ▁therefore , ▁wherever ▁a ▁man ▁receives ▁any ▁hurt ▁through ▁the ▁default ▁of ▁another , ▁though ▁the ▁same ▁were ▁not ▁wil ful , ▁yet ▁if ▁it ▁be ▁occasion ed ▁by ▁neg lig ence ▁or ▁fol ly , ▁the ▁law ▁gives ▁him ▁an ▁action ▁to ▁recover ▁dam ages ▁for ▁the ▁injury ▁so ▁sust ained ." ▁ ▁In ▁preced ent , ▁there ▁was ▁an ▁ob iter ▁suggestion ▁by ▁Lord ▁E sh er ▁in ▁Heaven ▁v ▁P ender ▁that ▁" when ever ▁one ▁person ▁is ▁by ▁circumstances ▁placed ▁in ▁such ▁a ▁position ▁with ▁regard ▁to ▁another ▁that ▁every ▁one ▁of ▁ordinary ▁sense ▁... ▁would ▁at ▁once ▁recogn ise ▁that ▁if ▁he ▁did ▁not ▁use ▁ordinary ▁care ▁and ▁skill ▁in ▁his ▁own ▁conduct ▁... ▁he ▁would ▁cause ▁danger ▁of ▁injury ▁to ▁the ▁person ▁or ▁property ▁of ▁the ▁other , ▁a ▁duty ▁ar ises ▁to ▁use ▁ordinary ▁care ▁and ▁skill ▁to ▁avoid ▁such ▁danger ". ▁However , ▁this ▁approach ▁had ▁been ▁rejected ▁by ▁the ▁two ▁other ▁jud ges ▁in ▁the ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al . ▁Lord ▁E sh er ' s ▁attempt ▁to ▁re int rodu ce ▁the ▁principle ▁in ▁further ▁ob iter ▁remarks ▁in ▁Le ▁Lie vre ▁v ▁G ould , ▁in ▁which ▁he ▁stated ▁that ▁Heaven ▁only ▁established ▁that ▁there ▁may ▁be ▁a ▁duty ▁even ▁if