: Transport ▁companies ▁established ▁in ▁ 1 9 5 4 <0x0A> </s> ▁R ED I RECT ▁Bra ille ▁pattern ▁d ots - 2 5 # Plus ▁d ots ▁ 7 ▁and ▁ 8 <0x0A> </s> ▁R ▁v ▁Z inn , ▁an ▁important ▁case ▁in ▁South ▁African ▁law , ▁was ▁heard ▁in ▁the ▁App ell ate ▁Division ▁on ▁ 6 ▁December ▁ 1 9 4 5 , ▁with ▁judgment ▁handed ▁down ▁on ▁ 1 3 ▁March ▁ 1 9 4 6 . ▁Wat erm ey er ▁C J , ▁T ind all ▁J A , ▁Green berg ▁J A , ▁Sch re iner ▁J A , ▁and ▁Davis ▁A J A . ▁NE ▁Ros enberg ▁K C ▁( with ▁him ▁D . ▁G ould ) ▁appeared ▁for ▁the ▁app ell ant , ▁and ▁C . ▁Norman ▁S co ble , ▁for ▁the ▁Crown . ▁ ▁Fact s ▁ ▁The ▁app ell ant ▁had ▁been ▁conv icted ▁of ▁a ▁contra vention ▁of ▁Volks ra ad ▁Bes l uit ▁No . ▁ 1 0 4 ▁of ▁ 2 5 ▁September ▁ 1 8 7 1 , ▁in ▁that ▁he ▁had ▁allowed ▁col oured ▁persons , ▁other ▁than ▁those ▁ex empt ed ▁by ▁the ▁Bes l uit , ▁to ▁occup y ▁an ▁erf ▁in ▁the ▁village ▁of ▁belonging ▁to ▁the ▁app ell ant , ▁and ▁had ▁been ▁f ined ▁£ 1 . ▁This ▁decision ▁was ▁appe aled ▁on ▁the ▁grounds ▁▁ ▁that ▁a ▁bre ach ▁of ▁the ▁prov isions ▁of ▁the ▁Bes l uit ▁was ▁not ▁a