▁whether ▁the ▁sentences ▁used ▁fewer ▁or ▁more . ▁In ▁general , ▁their ▁study ▁found ▁significantly ▁higher ▁accept ability ▁for ▁sentences ▁with ▁more ▁than ▁with ▁fewer ▁but ▁the ▁difference ▁did ▁not ▁dis pro port ion ately ▁affect ▁the ▁compar ative ▁ill usion ▁sentences ▁compared ▁to ▁the ▁controls . ▁ ▁Christ ensen ▁found ▁no ▁significant ▁difference ▁in ▁accept ability ▁for ▁Dan ish ▁C Is ▁with ▁ ▁(" more ") ▁compared ▁to ▁those ▁with ▁ ▁(" fe wer "). ▁ ▁Sub ject ▁choice ▁Exper iments ▁have ▁also ▁investig ated ▁the ▁effects ▁different ▁kinds ▁of ▁subjects ▁in ▁the ▁than - cla use ▁have ▁on ▁C Is ' ▁accept ability . ▁Well wood ▁and ▁colle agues ▁found ▁that ▁sentences ▁with ▁first ▁person ▁singular ▁pron oun ▁I ▁to ▁be ▁more ▁acceptable ▁than ▁those ▁with ▁the ▁third ▁person ▁singular ▁pron oun ▁he , ▁though ▁they ▁note ▁this ▁might ▁be ▁due ▁to ▁disc ourse ▁effects ▁and ▁the ▁lack ▁of ▁a ▁prior ▁ante ced ent ▁for ▁he . ▁They ▁found ▁no ▁significant ▁difference ▁for ▁sentences ▁with ▁a ▁singular ▁third ▁person ▁pron oun ▁( he ) ▁and ▁those ▁with ▁a ▁singular ▁definite ▁description ▁( the ▁boy ). ▁There ▁was ▁no ▁difference ▁in ▁number ▁for ▁the ▁first ▁person ▁pr onom inal ▁subject ▁( I ▁vs . ▁we ), ▁but ▁pl ural ▁definite ▁descri ptions ▁( the ▁boys ) ▁were ▁significantly ▁more ▁acceptable ▁than ▁singular ▁definite ▁descri ptions ▁( the ▁boy ). ▁Christ ensen ▁found ▁that ▁pl ural ▁subjects ▁( , ▁" w omen ") ▁in ▁the ▁than - cla use ▁led ▁to ▁significantly ▁higher