ki ▁attacked ▁Is mail ▁Ay ob ▁and ▁his ▁entire ▁family . ▁He ▁declared ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁an ▁issue ▁of ▁gu ilt ▁or ▁innoc ence . ▁Ah med ▁Kath r ada , ▁at ▁a ▁meeting ▁he ▁addressed ▁in ▁La ud ium , ▁called ▁on ▁Is mail ▁Ay ob ▁to ▁" s urr ender ". ▁Ah med ▁D ocrat ▁called ▁Is mail ▁Ay ob ▁a ▁" cro ok " ▁at ▁the ▁same ▁meeting . ▁There ▁were ▁calls ▁for ▁Is mail ▁Ay ob ▁and ▁his ▁family ▁to ▁be ▁ost rac ised ▁by ▁society ▁and ▁to ▁be ▁exp elled ▁from ▁Mos ques ▁and ▁community ▁and ▁char itable ▁organis ations ▁and ▁that ▁there ▁be ▁protest ▁march es ▁and ▁paid ▁newspaper ▁advert is ements ▁signed ▁by ▁supp or ters ▁of ▁Mr ▁Mand ela . ▁ ▁In ▁terms ▁of ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁rules , ▁Mr ▁Mand ela ▁and ▁his ▁new ▁advis ors ▁were ▁required ▁to ▁reply ▁within ▁two ▁weeks ▁of ▁the ▁answer ▁of ▁Is mail ▁Ay ob ▁and ▁Z amil a ▁Ay ob . ▁Some ▁ 2 0 ▁months ▁later , ▁no ▁reply ▁had ▁been ▁made . ▁▁ 2 0 0 7 ▁court ▁action ▁ ▁Is mail ▁Ay ob , ▁George ▁B iz os ▁and ▁W im ▁Tr eng ro ve ▁were ▁trust ees ▁of ▁the ▁Nelson ▁Mand ela ▁Trust . ▁The ▁Trust ▁was ▁set ▁up ▁to ▁hold ▁money ▁don ated ▁to ▁Nelson ▁Mand ela . ▁Is mail ▁Ay ob ▁res igned ▁from ▁the ▁Trust . ▁In ▁ 2 0 0 6 , ▁the ▁two ▁remaining ▁trust ees ▁of ▁the