▁In ▁an ▁Aff id av it ▁sw orn ▁ 2 3 ▁January ▁ 1 9 2 3 ▁in ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁of ▁Justice ▁Ch anc ery ▁Division ▁before ▁Mr . ▁Justice ▁E ve , ▁re . ▁Ch all on er ' s ▁S ett led ▁Est ate , ▁Rod olph ▁wrote : ▁' As ▁regards ▁paragraph ▁eight ▁my ▁view ▁is ▁that ▁having ▁regard ▁to ▁the ▁proposed ▁develop ments ▁there ▁will ▁shortly ▁be ▁little ▁to ▁choose ▁between ▁Daw ley ▁and ▁Port n all ▁in ▁respect ▁of ▁destroyed ▁amen ities '. ▁ ▁Com parison ▁in ▁ 2 0 0 8 ▁of ▁the ▁fate ▁of ▁the ▁land ▁around ▁Daw ley , ▁M idd les ex , ▁just ▁south ▁of ▁H illing don ▁towards ▁He ath row , ▁with ▁the ▁present ▁state ▁of ▁the ▁W ent worth ▁Est ate ▁would ▁show ▁that ▁to ▁have ▁been ▁a ▁mis calcul ation . ▁( D aw ley ▁was ▁a ▁small ▁estate ▁that ▁his ▁brother ▁had ▁inherited ▁and ▁had ▁seem ingly ▁proposed ▁to ▁sell ▁off ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁keep ▁Port n all ). ▁ ▁George ▁Pro s ser ' s ▁description ▁of ▁ 1 8 2 8 ▁ ▁THE ▁SE AT ▁OF ▁COL ON EL ▁B IS SE ▁CH ALL ON ER ▁Port en hall ,- ▁or ▁Port n all ▁park , ▁formerly ▁belonged ▁to ▁the ▁crown . ▁In ▁an ▁act ▁of ▁parliament ▁passed ▁in ▁the ▁first ▁year ▁of ▁the ▁reign ▁of ▁Henry ▁the ▁Se vent h , ▁ 1 4 8 5 , ▁for ▁res umption ▁of ▁all ▁gr ants