▁my ▁customers ’ ▁requirements .’ ▁The ▁CG K R ▁( C entre ▁for ▁equal ▁opportun ities ▁and ▁opposition ▁to ▁rac ism ) ▁cont ended ▁that ▁this ▁policy ▁was ▁a ▁bre ach ▁of ▁the ▁Ra cial ▁Equ ality ▁Direct ive ▁ 2 0 0 0 / 4 3 / EC , ▁as ▁it ▁constit uted ▁direct ▁disc rim ination . ▁ ▁The ▁President ▁of ▁the ▁Arbe ids recht bank ▁Br uss els ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁public ▁statements ▁did ▁not ▁count ▁as ▁disc rim ination . ▁They ▁were ▁merely ▁evidence ▁of ▁potential ▁disc rim ination . ▁The ▁CG K R ▁did ▁not ▁show ▁that ▁anyone ▁was ▁ever ▁actually ▁turned ▁down . ▁ ▁Jud gment ▁ ▁Adv oc ate ▁General ▁Op in ion ▁Adv oc ate ▁General ▁Mad uro ▁ad vised ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁direct ▁disc rim ination . ▁ ▁Court ▁of ▁Justice ▁The ▁European ▁Court ▁of ▁Justice ▁held ▁that ▁an ▁advert is ement ▁would ▁dis su ade ▁applic ants ▁for ▁employ ment ▁and ▁constit uted ▁direct ▁disc rim ination . ▁It ▁was ▁unnecessary ▁to ▁show ▁there ▁was ▁actually ▁a ▁dis su as ive ▁effect , ▁but ▁the ▁company ▁was ▁entitled ▁to ▁bring ▁evidence ▁to ▁show ▁its ▁practices ▁were ▁not ▁disc rimin atory . ▁ ▁See ▁also ▁ ▁European ▁Union ▁law ▁ ▁Notes ▁ ▁References ▁ ▁External ▁links ▁ ▁Category : C ivil ▁rights ▁case ▁law ▁Category : C ourt ▁of ▁Justice ▁of ▁the ▁European ▁Union ▁case ▁law ▁Category : Europe an ▁Union ▁labour ▁case ▁law ▁Category : Emp loyment ▁disc rim ination <0x0A> </s> ▁This