▁more ▁effective ▁than ▁Swift ' s ▁version ▁because ▁I ▁can ▁believe ▁that ▁both ▁P uck ▁and ▁Be iste ▁have ▁had ▁it ▁rough ", ▁and ▁Stre cker ▁described ▁it ▁as ▁" lov ely ▁and ▁them atically ▁perfect " ▁and ▁gave ▁it ▁a ▁" B ". ▁Van Der W er ff ▁said ▁he ▁" could ▁have ▁done ▁without " ▁their ▁du et , ▁and ▁F utter man ▁was ▁even ▁har sh er : ▁" it ▁was ▁quite ▁un fortun ate ". ▁Houston ▁Chron icle ▁Bobby ▁H ank inson ▁wrote ▁that ▁he ▁" sort ▁of ▁liked " ▁how ▁the ▁pair ▁were ▁" sim ult ane ously ▁impro ving ▁upon ▁and ▁but ch ering ▁a ▁Taylor ▁Swift ▁song ", ▁and ▁S ask in ▁character ized ▁it ▁as ▁" heart f elt ▁and ▁passion ate ". ▁ ▁F utter man ▁said ▁of ▁" Fl ash d ance ... ▁What ▁a ▁Fe eling " ▁that ▁" there ▁was ▁a ▁g lim mer ▁of ▁old - school ▁G lee ▁in ▁the ▁performance , ▁care free ▁under dog ▁status ▁that ▁made ▁me ▁smile ". ▁S ask in ▁and ▁Chan ey ▁both ▁found ▁the ▁performance ▁lack ing ; ▁the ▁former ▁wrote ▁that ▁" something ▁about ▁this ▁version ▁falls ▁flat ", ▁and ▁Chan ey ▁gave ▁it ▁a ▁ ▁and ▁said ▁it ▁" was n ' t ▁as ▁so aring ▁as ▁it ▁could ▁have ▁been ", ▁though ▁" R ach el ▁and ▁T ina ' s ▁bond ing ▁moment ▁was ▁sweet " ▁and ▁she ▁liked ▁" the ▁way ▁it ▁took ▁us ▁from ▁hour ▁one