▁" right ", ▁even ▁though ▁the ▁actual ▁physical ▁action ▁performed ▁is ▁the ▁same . ▁If ▁God ▁commands ▁not ▁to ▁cov et ▁a ▁neighbour ' s ▁goods , ▁this ▁theory ▁holds ▁that ▁it ▁would ▁be ▁imm oral ▁to ▁do ▁so , ▁even ▁if ▁cov eting ▁provides ▁the ▁benef icial ▁outcome ▁of ▁a ▁drive ▁to ▁succeed ▁or ▁do ▁well . ▁ ▁One ▁thing ▁that ▁clearly ▁distingu ishes ▁Kant ian ▁de ont olog ism ▁from ▁divine ▁command ▁de ont ology ▁is ▁that ▁Kant ian ism ▁maintain s ▁that ▁man , ▁as ▁a ▁rational ▁being , ▁makes ▁the ▁moral ▁law ▁universal , ▁whereas ▁divine ▁command ▁maintain s ▁that ▁God ▁makes ▁the ▁moral ▁law ▁universal . ▁ ▁Contempor ary ▁de ont ology ▁Contempor ary ▁de ont olog ists ▁( sch ol ars ▁born ▁in ▁the ▁first ▁half ▁of ▁the ▁ 2 0 th ▁century ) ▁include ▁Jó zef ▁Maria ▁Bo che ński , ▁Thomas ▁Nag el , ▁Thomas ▁Sc an lon , ▁and ▁Roger ▁Sc rut on . ▁ ▁Bo che ński ▁( 1 9 6 5 ) ▁makes ▁a ▁distinction ▁between ▁de ont ic ▁and ▁ep ist em ic ▁authority . ▁ ▁A ▁typical ▁example ▁of ▁ep ist em ic ▁authority ▁in ▁Bo che ński ' s ▁usage ▁would ▁be ▁" the ▁relation ▁of ▁a ▁teacher ▁to ▁his ▁students "; ▁an ▁example ▁of ▁de ont ic ▁authority ▁would ▁be ▁" the ▁relation ▁between ▁an ▁employ er ▁and ▁his ▁employee ". ▁A ▁teacher ▁has ▁ep ist em ic ▁authority ▁when ▁making ▁declar ative ▁sentences ▁that ▁the ▁student ▁pres