▁de ities , ▁" th ese ▁women ▁are ▁more ▁like ▁femin ine ▁em an ations ▁of ▁his ▁and rog yn ous ▁nature , ▁Sh akt is ▁rather ▁than ▁sp ouses ▁having ▁their ▁own ▁characters ▁and ▁sp ouses ." ▁ ▁L udo ▁Ro cher ▁says ▁that ▁" des cri ptions ▁of ▁ ▁as ▁s idd hi - bud d hi - sam an v ita ▁' ac comp an ied ▁by , ▁followed ▁by ▁s idd hi ▁and ▁bud d hi .' ▁often ▁seem ▁to ▁mean ▁no ▁more ▁than ▁that , ▁when ▁ ▁is ▁present , ▁s idd hi ▁' success ' ▁and ▁bud d hi ▁' w is dom ' ▁are ▁not ▁far ▁behind . ▁ ▁Such ▁may ▁well ▁have ▁been ▁the ▁original ▁conception , ▁of ▁which ▁the ▁marriage ▁was ▁a ▁later ▁development ." ▁In ▁verse ▁ 4 9 a ▁of ▁the ▁G anes ha ▁Pur ana ▁version ▁of ▁the ▁G anes ha ▁Sah as ran ama , ▁one ▁of ▁G anes ha ' s ▁names ▁is ▁ <0xC5> <0x96> dd his idd hip rav ard h ana ▁(" En han cer ▁of ▁material ▁and ▁spiritual ▁success "). ▁The ▁M ats ya ▁Pur ana ▁ident ifies ▁ ▁as ▁the ▁" owner " ▁of ▁R idd hi ▁( pro s per ity ) ▁and ▁Bud d hi ▁( w is dom ). ▁In ▁discuss ing ▁the ▁northern ▁Indian ▁sources , ▁C ohen ▁remarks : ▁" They ▁are ▁dep erson al ized ▁figures , ▁inter change able , ▁and ▁given ▁their ▁frequent ▁dep iction ▁f