▁str essed ▁that ▁although ▁Am end ment ▁ 2 8 ▁was ▁en act ed ▁out ▁of ▁a ▁desire ▁to ▁improve ▁the ▁det ention ▁conditions ▁of ▁prisoners ▁in ▁Israel , ▁the ▁main ▁purpose ▁behind ▁the ▁Am end ment ▁was ▁an ▁economic ▁one , ▁reflect ing ▁a ▁desire ▁to ▁save ▁as ▁much ▁money ▁as ▁possible ▁for ▁the ▁State . ▁In ▁this ▁context , ▁she ▁str essed ▁in ▁her ▁r uling ▁that ▁although ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁does ▁not ▁generally ▁interven e ▁in ▁the ▁government ' s ▁and ▁the ▁K ness et ' s ▁economic ▁policies , ▁when ▁it ▁comes ▁to ▁legisl ation ▁affect ing ▁the ▁most ▁basic ▁constitution al ▁rights , ▁the ▁fact ▁that ▁an ▁economic ▁r ationale ▁may ▁have ▁motiv ated ▁the ▁legisl ation ▁does ▁not ▁prevent ▁the ▁Court ▁from ▁passing ▁judgment ▁on ▁the ▁law . ▁ ▁In ▁May ▁ 2 0 1 2 , ▁the ▁court ▁ruled ▁that ▁employ ers ▁who ▁pay ▁female ▁employees ▁a ▁significantly ▁lower ▁sal ary ▁than ▁their ▁male ▁counter parts ▁will ▁bear ▁the ▁bur den ▁of ▁proof ▁in ▁case ▁they ▁are ▁accused ▁of ▁disc rim ination , ▁thus ▁strength ening ▁women ' s ▁work place ▁rights . ▁In ▁Be in isch ' s ▁r uling , ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁stated ▁that ▁a ▁woman ▁su ing ▁for ▁disc rim ination ▁will ▁not ▁have ▁to ▁prove ▁she ▁was ▁dep riv ed ▁of ▁pay ▁because ▁of ▁her ▁gender , ▁but ▁only ▁show ▁there ▁is ▁a ▁significant ▁difference ▁in ▁sal aries . ▁At ▁this ▁point , ▁the ▁bur den ▁of ▁proof ▁would ▁lie ▁with