ed ▁in ▁which ▁are ▁all ▁future ▁events ), ▁and ▁is ▁a ▁property ▁often ▁attributed ▁to ▁a ▁cre ator ▁de ity . ▁Om nis cience ▁implies ▁the ▁existence ▁of ▁dest iny . ▁Some ▁authors ▁have ▁claimed ▁that ▁free ▁will ▁cannot ▁co exist ▁with ▁om nis cience . ▁One ▁argument ▁as ser ts ▁that ▁an ▁om nis cient ▁cre ator ▁not ▁only ▁implies ▁dest iny ▁but ▁a ▁form ▁of ▁high ▁level ▁pred et erm in ism ▁such ▁as ▁hard ▁the ological ▁determin ism ▁or ▁pred est ination   – ▁that ▁they ▁have ▁independently ▁fixed ▁all ▁events ▁and ▁out comes ▁in ▁the ▁universe ▁in ▁advance . ▁In ▁such ▁a ▁case , ▁even ▁if ▁an ▁individual ▁could ▁have ▁influence ▁over ▁their ▁lower ▁level ▁physical ▁system , ▁their ▁choices ▁in ▁regard ▁to ▁this ▁cannot ▁be ▁their ▁own , ▁as ▁is ▁the ▁case ▁with ▁libert arian ▁free ▁will . ▁Om nis cience ▁features ▁as ▁an ▁in compatible - properties ▁argument ▁for ▁the ▁existence ▁of ▁God , ▁known ▁as ▁the ▁argument ▁from ▁free ▁will , ▁and ▁is ▁closely ▁related ▁to ▁other ▁such ▁arguments , ▁for ▁example ▁the ▁in compat ibility ▁of ▁om n ip ot ence ▁with ▁a ▁good ▁cre ator ▁de ity ▁( i . e . ▁if ▁a ▁de ity ▁knew ▁what ▁they ▁were ▁going ▁to ▁choose , ▁then ▁they ▁are ▁responsible ▁for ▁letting ▁them ▁choose ▁it ). ▁ ▁Pred et erm in ism ▁ ▁Pred et erm in ism ▁is ▁the ▁idea ▁that ▁all ▁events ▁are ▁determined ▁in ▁advance . ▁Pred et erm in ism ▁is ▁the