▁The ▁Est ab lish ment ▁Cla use ▁claim ▁Mil ford ▁also ▁argued ▁that ▁its ▁interest ▁in ▁not ▁viol ating ▁the ▁Est ab lish ment ▁Cla use ▁just ified ▁its ▁ex cluding ▁the ▁Good ▁News ▁Club ▁from ▁its ▁facilities . ▁ ▁In ▁W id mar ▁v . ▁Vincent , ▁, ▁the ▁Court ▁held ▁that ▁" a ▁state ▁interest ▁in ▁avoid ing ▁an ▁Est ab lish ment ▁Cla use ▁viol ation ▁may ▁be ▁character ized ▁as ▁comp elling , ▁and ▁therefore ▁may ▁justify ▁content - based ▁disc rim ination " ▁on ▁the ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁state ▁entity . ▁ ▁But ▁in ▁Lamb ' s ▁Chap el , ▁the ▁Court ▁left ▁open ▁the ▁question ▁of ▁whether ▁such ▁a ▁concern ▁could ▁also ▁justify ▁view point ▁disc rim ination . ▁ ▁The ▁Court ▁ruled ▁that ▁it ▁could ▁not , ▁and ▁gave ▁four ▁reasons ▁for ▁distingu ishing ▁content - based ▁disc rim ination ▁from ▁view point ▁disc rim ination ▁on ▁this ▁score . ▁ ▁First , ▁the ▁exception ▁created ▁in ▁W id mar ▁rest ed ▁on ▁the ▁fact ▁that ▁the ▁government ▁program ▁was ▁neutral ▁toward ▁religion . ▁ ▁" The ▁Good ▁News ▁Club ▁see ks ▁nothing ▁more ▁than ▁to ▁be ▁treated ▁neut r ally ▁and ▁given ▁access ▁to ▁speak ▁about ▁the ▁same ▁topics ▁as ▁are ▁other ▁groups ." ▁ ▁Mil ford ' s ▁policy ▁was ▁not ▁neutral ▁with ▁respect ▁to ▁religious ▁speech — it ▁allowed ▁some ▁speech ▁that ▁took ▁a ▁particular ▁view point , ▁but ▁forb ade ▁speech ▁that ▁took ▁the ▁same ▁view point ▁on ▁the ▁basis ▁of ▁the