▁requires ." ▁This ▁form ulation , ▁Mor se ▁believed , ▁would ▁better ▁protect ▁people ' s ▁priv acy ▁expect ations ▁as ▁technology ▁advanced . ▁Last ly ▁he ▁placed ▁the ▁bur den ▁of ▁proof ▁on ▁the ▁state ▁in ▁cases ▁where ▁a ▁search ▁such ▁as ▁the ▁one ▁in ▁the ▁instant ▁case , ▁was ▁challeng ed ▁as ▁un const itution al , ▁and ▁held ▁that ▁under ▁that ▁standard ▁this ▁search ▁had ▁viol ated ▁the ▁state ▁constitution . ▁ ▁There ▁were ▁two ▁other ▁opinions . ▁District ▁Judge ▁Lewis ▁Springer , ▁spe cially ▁assigned ▁to ▁sit ▁on ▁the ▁court ▁for ▁this ▁case ▁due ▁to ▁a ▁vac ant ▁seat , ▁con cur red ▁but ▁said ▁the ▁majority ▁opinion ▁should ▁have ▁more ▁thoroughly ▁ground ed ▁its ▁arguments ▁in ▁the ▁state ' s ▁constitution al ▁history ▁rather ▁than ▁the ▁federal ▁constitution . ▁Louis ▁P . ▁Pe ck , ▁in ▁one ▁of ▁his ▁last ▁opinions ▁before ▁ret irement , ▁diss ented ▁at ▁length , ▁attack ing ▁and ▁rid icul ing ▁the ▁majority ▁for ▁jud icial ▁activ ism ▁in ▁an ▁opinion ▁r ife ▁with ▁cultural ▁and ▁literary ▁references . ▁ ▁D issent ▁ ▁" I ▁am ▁sad ly ▁disappoint ed , ▁and ▁fr ustr ated ▁beyond ▁comfort ", ▁by ▁the ▁majority ▁opinion , ▁Pe ck ▁began . ▁He ▁li ken ed ▁it ▁to ▁a ▁brief ▁for ▁the ▁def endant ▁in ▁the ▁case . ▁"[ I ] t ▁is , ▁in ▁my ▁judgment , ▁one ▁of ▁the ▁most ▁result - orient ed ▁opinions ▁I ▁have ▁ever ▁been ▁exposed ▁to . ▁I ▁am ▁not ▁prepared