▁terror ism ▁in ▁the ▁list ▁of ▁cr imes , ▁and ▁also ▁agree ing ▁on ▁a ▁definition ▁of ▁cr imes ▁of ▁ag gression ▁so ▁that ▁the ▁court ▁can ▁exercise ▁its ▁juris diction ▁over ▁this ▁crime . ▁▁ ▁Two ▁am end ments ▁to ▁the ▁Rome ▁Stat ute ▁of ▁the ▁International ▁C riminal ▁Court ▁were ▁adopted . ▁The ▁first ▁one ▁is ▁to ▁extend ▁the ▁juris diction ▁of ▁the ▁Court ▁over ▁some ▁war ▁cr imes ▁committed ▁in ▁non - intern ational ▁conflicts ▁for ▁which ▁it ▁already ▁had ▁juris diction ▁if ▁committed ▁in ▁international ▁conflicts . ▁The ▁second ▁one ▁defines ▁the ▁crime ▁of ▁ag gression ▁and ▁l ays ▁out ▁conditions ▁for ▁the ▁juris diction ▁of ▁the ▁Court ▁to ▁be ▁in ▁force . ▁ ▁The ▁trans itional ▁provision ▁of ▁Article ▁ 1 2 4 ▁regarding ▁the ▁war ▁cr imes ▁opt - out ▁was ▁also ▁discussed ▁at ▁the ▁review ▁conference , ▁but ▁it ▁was ▁decided ▁to ▁retain ▁it ▁for ▁the ▁time ▁being . ▁ ▁There ▁was ▁some ▁disag re ement ▁as ▁to ▁whether ▁the ▁am end ment ▁rel ating ▁to ▁the ▁definition ▁of ▁the ▁crime ▁of ▁ag gression ▁needs ▁rat ification ▁by ▁seven ▁e ighth s ▁of ▁the ▁states ▁parties ▁( as ▁a ▁change ▁of ▁institution al ▁prov isions ▁would ) ▁to ▁enter ▁into ▁force ▁or ▁if ▁it ▁comes ▁only ▁in ▁force ▁for ▁those ▁countries ▁that ▁have ▁rat ified ▁it ▁( as ▁a ▁change ▁of ▁crime ▁prov isions ▁would ▁and ▁as ▁the ▁am end ment ▁itself ▁puts ▁it ). ▁With ▁the ▁latter ▁view ▁prev ail ing , ▁the ▁United ▁Nations