▁evidence ▁at ▁its ▁dis cret ion . ▁In ▁the ▁specific ▁case ▁of ▁the ▁app ell ant , ▁the ▁failure ▁to ▁inform ▁him ▁of ▁his ▁right ▁to ▁consult ▁a ▁lawyer ▁was ▁intent ional , ▁and ▁this ▁was ▁a ▁significant ▁factor ▁in ▁Be in isch ' s ▁decision ▁to ▁exclude ▁the ▁conf essions ▁he ▁made ▁in ▁the ▁inter rog ation . ▁ ▁The ▁same ▁year , ▁in ▁one ▁of ▁her ▁most ▁famous ▁and ▁controvers ial ▁r ul ings ▁as ▁a ▁justice , ▁she ▁ruled ▁that ▁parents ▁cannot ▁use ▁corpor al ▁pun ishment , ▁writing ▁that ▁corpor al ▁pun ishment ▁viol ates ▁the ▁child ' s ▁right ▁to ▁dign ity ▁and ▁bod ily ▁integrity . ▁ ▁Some ▁of ▁her ▁most ▁important ▁r ul ings ▁have ▁de alt ▁saf egu arding ▁human ▁rights ▁while ▁address ing ▁pressing ▁security ▁needs , ▁primarily ▁in ▁cases ▁concerning ▁Israel ' s ▁activities ▁in ▁the ▁occupied ▁Palest in ian ▁territ ories . ▁In ▁a ▁ 2 0 0 5 ▁r uling ▁against ▁the ▁Isra eli ▁army ' s ▁use ▁of ▁“ human ▁shield s ” ▁she ▁con cur red ▁with ▁then - Pres ident ▁Ah aron ▁Bar ak ▁that ▁the ▁practice ▁of ▁sending ▁in ▁a ▁local ▁Palest in ian ▁ahead ▁of ▁Isra eli ▁troops ▁during ▁arrest ▁ra ids ▁end anger ed ▁his ▁life , ▁viol ated ▁his ▁free ▁will ▁and ▁his ▁human ▁dign ity . ▁ ▁In ▁a ▁judgment ▁rendered ▁in ▁September ▁ 2 0 0 7 ▁concerning ▁the ▁separation ▁f ence ▁being ▁built ▁by ▁Israel , ▁Be in isch ▁ruled ▁that