▁the ▁defence ▁of ▁Barb astro ▁( which ▁was ▁briefly ▁occupied ▁in ▁ 1 0 6 3 – 6 4 ), ▁and ▁Ar gu ed as ▁were ▁not ▁taken ▁until ▁ 1 0 8 4 , ▁and ▁shortly ▁lost ▁to ▁the ▁Mo ors ▁for ▁a ▁de cade . ▁ ▁Since ▁P ied ra ▁P is ada ▁( P isa ) ▁lies ▁on ▁the ▁road ▁south ▁from ▁Naval , ▁the ▁Arag on ese ▁army ▁would ▁have ▁had ▁to ▁by pass ▁an ▁important ▁enemy ▁fort ification ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁fight ▁there , ▁unless ▁Naval ▁had ▁already ▁been ▁taken . ▁It ▁is ▁most ▁likely ▁therefore ▁that ▁the ▁date ▁of ▁ 1 0 8 4 ▁found ▁in ▁the ▁Latin ▁chron icle ▁is ▁correct . ▁Since ▁the ▁loss ▁of ▁Naval ▁pos ed ▁a ▁threat ▁to ▁Barb astro , ▁it ▁is ▁likely ▁that ▁forces ▁from ▁the ▁ta ifa ▁were ▁sent ▁to ▁re take ▁it ▁later ▁in ▁ 1 0 8 4 ▁and ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁these ▁forces ▁which ▁San cho ▁Ram í rez ▁met ▁on ▁the ▁road ▁south ▁from ▁Naval . ▁Since ▁neither ▁surv iving ▁record ▁of ▁the ▁battle , ▁both ▁Christian , ▁records ▁the ▁outcome ▁and ▁Naval ▁is ▁known ▁to ▁have ▁la ps ed ▁out ▁of ▁Christian ▁control ▁soon ▁after ▁its ▁con quest , ▁it ▁is ▁probable ▁that ▁the ▁battle ▁was ▁a ▁loss ▁for ▁San cho . ▁ ▁In ▁the ▁after math ▁of ▁the ▁defeat ▁at ▁P ied ra ▁P is ada , ▁in ▁ 1 0 8 5 ▁San cho ▁inv ested ▁his ▁son ▁Peter ▁as ▁king ▁of