▁militar ism , ▁har sh ▁pun ishment , ▁easier ▁divor ce ▁laws ▁and ▁companion ate ▁marriage . ▁ ▁Despite ▁the ▁difference ▁in ▁method ology , ▁location ▁and ▁theory , ▁the ▁results ▁att ained ▁by ▁E ys en ck ▁and ▁Fer g us on ▁matched . ▁Sim ply ▁rot ating ▁E ys en ck ' s ▁two ▁factors ▁ 4 5 ▁degrees ▁rend ers ▁the ▁same ▁factors ▁of ▁religion ism ▁and ▁human itar ian ism ▁identified ▁by ▁Fer g us on ▁in ▁America . ▁ ▁E ys en ck ' s ▁dimensions ▁of ▁R ▁and ▁T ▁were ▁found ▁by ▁factor ▁anal ys es ▁of ▁values ▁in ▁Germany ▁and ▁Sweden , ▁France ▁and ▁Japan . ▁ ▁One ▁interesting ▁result ▁E ys en ck ▁noted ▁in ▁his ▁ 1 9 5 6 ▁work ▁was ▁that ▁in ▁the ▁United ▁States ▁and ▁Great ▁Britain , ▁most ▁of ▁the ▁political ▁variance ▁was ▁sub sum ed ▁by ▁the ▁left / right ▁axis , ▁while ▁in ▁France ▁the ▁T - axis ▁was ▁larger ▁and ▁in ▁the ▁Middle ▁East ▁the ▁only ▁dimension ▁to ▁be ▁found ▁was ▁the ▁T - axis : ▁" Am ong ▁mid - E astern ▁Arab s ▁it ▁has ▁been ▁found ▁that ▁while ▁the ▁t ough - mind ed / t ender - mind ed ▁dimension ▁is ▁still ▁clearly ▁expressed ▁in ▁the ▁relationships ▁observed ▁between ▁different ▁att itudes , ▁there ▁is ▁nothing ▁that ▁corresponds ▁to ▁the ▁radical - con serv ative ▁continu um ". ▁ ▁Rel ations hip ▁between ▁E ys en ck ' s ▁political ▁views ▁and ▁political