, ▁the ▁Royal ▁Society ▁stated ▁that ▁" int ellig ent ▁design ▁has ▁far ▁more ▁in ▁common ▁with ▁a ▁religious ▁belief ▁in ▁creation ism ▁than ▁it ▁has ▁with ▁science " ▁and ▁raised ▁concerns ▁that ▁" you ng ▁people ▁are ▁poor ly ▁served ▁by ▁deliber ate ▁attempts ▁to ▁with hold , ▁dist ort ▁or ▁mis re present ▁scientific ▁knowledge ▁and ▁understanding ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁promote ▁particular ▁religious ▁belief s ". ▁In ▁a ▁Guardian ▁newspaper ▁article , ▁dated ▁ 2 7 ▁November ▁ 2 0 0 6 , ▁Professor ▁Lewis ▁Wol pert ▁of ▁University ▁College ▁London , ▁attacked ▁intellig ent ▁design , ▁and ▁the ▁amb itions ▁of ▁Tr uth ▁in ▁Science : ▁" There ▁is ▁just ▁no ▁evidence ▁for ▁intellig ent ▁design , ▁it ▁is ▁pure ▁religion ▁and ▁has ▁nothing ▁to ▁do ▁with ▁science . ▁It ▁should ▁be ▁b anned ▁from ▁science ▁classes ". ▁In ▁October ▁ 2 0 0 6 , ▁a ▁science ▁organization ▁called ▁Science , ▁Just ▁Science ▁review ed ▁the ▁DVD ▁information ▁pack s ▁sent ▁by ▁Tr uth ▁in ▁Science ▁to ▁the ▁heads ▁of ▁science ▁at ▁all ▁United ▁Kingdom ▁secondary ▁schools ▁in ▁September ▁ 2 0 0 6 . ▁ ▁The ▁UK ▁pro - s cience ▁advoc acy ▁group ▁British ▁Centre ▁for ▁Science ▁Education ▁has ▁condem ned ▁attempts ▁to ▁introduce ▁the ▁teaching ▁of ▁creation ism ▁at ▁British ▁schools . ▁BC SE ▁protest ed ▁when ▁Tr uth ▁in ▁Science ▁sent ▁information ▁pack s ▁to ▁every ▁UK ▁secondary ▁school ▁in ▁September , ▁ 2 0 0 6 . ▁In ▁a ▁letter ▁to ▁the ▁editor ,