ency ’ s ▁data ▁to ▁find ▁fla ws ▁in ▁the ▁ag ency ’ s ▁reasoning . ▁ ▁Also , ▁interested ▁parties ’ ▁comments ▁on ▁the ▁rule ▁then ▁become ▁part ▁of ▁this ▁record . ▁ ▁Rule making ▁and ▁the ▁courts ▁In ▁the ▁U . S ., ▁interested ▁parties ▁can ▁sue ▁to ▁have ▁a ▁judge ▁review ▁the ▁rule making ▁process ▁once ▁the ▁rule ▁is ▁final ized . ▁Inter ested ▁parties ▁frequently ▁sue ▁the ▁rule making ▁ag ency , ▁asking ▁the ▁court ▁to ▁order ▁the ▁ag ency ▁to ▁re cons ider . ▁For ▁example , ▁environmental ▁groups ▁may ▁sue , ▁claim ing ▁that ▁the ▁rule ▁is ▁too ▁la x ▁on ▁industry ; ▁or ▁industry ▁groups ▁may ▁sue , ▁claim ing ▁that ▁the ▁rule ▁is ▁too ▁on er ous . ▁ ▁Trad itionally , ▁courts ▁are ▁rel uct ant ▁to ▁step ▁into ▁the ▁sho es ▁of ▁the ▁technical ▁exper ts ▁and ▁re - open ▁the ▁dec isions ▁made ▁in ▁the ▁ag ency ’ s ▁detailed ▁analysis . ▁However , ▁courts ▁do ▁review ▁whether ▁a ▁rule making ▁meets ▁the ▁standards ▁for ▁the ▁rule making ▁process . ▁The ▁basis ▁of ▁this ▁review ▁by ▁the ▁courts ▁may ▁be ▁limited ▁to ▁certain ▁questions ▁of ▁fair ness ▁or ▁the ▁procedures ▁that ▁ensure ▁that ▁both ▁sides ▁of ▁a ▁dispute ▁are ▁treated ▁equally ▁before ▁any ▁decision ▁making ▁occurs ▁or ▁that ▁the ▁decision ▁is ▁not ▁pat ently ▁un reason able ▁( under ▁Canadian ▁law ) ▁or ▁Wed nes bury ▁un reason ab len ess ▁( under ▁British ▁law ) ▁or ▁similar ▁do ctr ines ▁described