▁consistent ▁with ▁the ▁language ▁and ▁intent ▁of ▁the ▁Constitution , ▁including ▁the ▁explicit ▁grant ▁of ▁jud icial ▁power ▁to ▁the ▁federal ▁courts . ▁The ▁Court ▁stated : ▁" There ▁is ▁certainly ▁nothing ▁in ▁the ▁circumstances ▁under ▁which ▁our ▁Constitution ▁was ▁formed , ▁nothing ▁in ▁the ▁history ▁of ▁the ▁times , ▁which ▁would ▁justify ▁the ▁opinion ▁that ▁the ▁confidence ▁re posed ▁in ▁the ▁States ▁was ▁so ▁implicit ▁as ▁to ▁leave ▁in ▁them ▁and ▁their ▁trib un als ▁the ▁power ▁of ▁resist ing ▁or ▁defe ating , ▁in ▁the ▁form ▁of ▁law , ▁the ▁legit imate ▁measures ▁of ▁the ▁Union ." ▁Therefore , ▁the ▁Court ▁said , ▁the ▁fram ers ▁of ▁the ▁Constitution ▁did ▁" con fer ▁on ▁the ▁jud icial ▁department ▁the ▁power ▁of ▁constru ing ▁the ▁Constitution ▁and ▁laws ▁of ▁the ▁Union ▁in ▁every ▁case , ▁in ▁the ▁last ▁resort , ▁and ▁of ▁pres erving ▁them ▁from ▁all ▁viol ation ▁from ▁every ▁quarter , ▁so ▁far ▁as ▁jud icial ▁dec isions ▁can ▁preserve ▁them ." ▁ ▁The ▁Court ▁also ▁said ▁that ▁if ▁state ▁court ▁dec isions ▁involving ▁federal ▁law ▁were ▁un review able ▁by ▁federal ▁courts , ▁then ▁there ▁would ▁be ▁as ▁many ▁interpret ations ▁of ▁federal ▁law ▁as ▁there ▁are ▁states . ▁Qu oting ▁The ▁Federal ist ▁No . ▁ 8 0 , ▁the ▁Court ▁found ▁that ▁the ▁Constitution ▁was ▁not ▁intended ▁to ▁create ▁" a ▁hyd ra ▁in ▁government ▁from ▁which ▁nothing ▁but ▁contradiction ▁and ▁confusion ▁can ▁proceed ." ▁R ather , ▁re lying ▁on ▁The ▁Federal ist ▁No . ▁