▁damage ▁inf lic ted ▁directly ▁( tres pass ▁to ▁the ▁person ) ▁or ▁indirect ly ▁( tres pass ▁on ▁the ▁case ). ▁ ▁Being ▁made ▁ill ▁by ▁cons uming ▁a ▁no x ious ▁subst ance ▁did ▁not ▁qual ify ▁as ▁either , ▁so ▁the ▁orth odox ▁view ▁was ▁that ▁Mrs ▁Don og h ue ▁had ▁no ▁sust ain able ▁claim ▁in ▁law . ▁ ▁However , ▁the ▁decision ▁fund ament ally ▁created ▁a ▁new ▁type ▁of ▁li ability ▁in ▁law ▁which ▁did ▁not ▁depend ▁upon ▁any ▁previously ▁recogn ised ▁category ▁of ▁tort ious ▁claims . ▁ ▁This ▁was ▁an ▁evolution ary ▁step ▁in ▁the ▁common ▁law ▁for ▁tort ▁and ▁del ict , ▁moving ▁from ▁strict ▁li ability ▁based ▁upon ▁direct ▁physical ▁contact ▁to ▁a ▁fault - based ▁system ▁which ▁only ▁required ▁injury . ▁ ▁This ▁evolution ▁was ▁taken ▁further ▁in ▁the ▁later ▁decision ▁of ▁Let ang ▁v ▁Cooper ▁[ 1 9 6 5 ] ▁ 1 ▁Q B ▁ 2 3 2 ▁when ▁it ▁was ▁held ▁that ▁actions ▁should ▁not ▁be ▁joint ly ▁ple aded ▁in ▁tres pass ▁and ▁neg lig ence , ▁but ▁in ▁neg lig ence ▁alone . ▁ ▁Fact s ▁ ▁On ▁the ▁evening ▁of ▁Sunday ▁ 2 6 ▁August ▁ 1 9 2 8 , ▁during ▁the ▁Glasgow ▁Tr ades ▁Hol iday , ▁Don og h ue ▁took ▁a ▁train ▁to ▁P ais ley , ▁Ren f rew shire . ▁In ▁P ais ley , ▁she ▁went ▁to ▁the ▁Well me adow ▁C afé . ▁A ▁friend , ▁who