▁section ▁ 1 8 C , ▁and ▁ordered ▁each ▁to ▁pay ▁the ▁five ▁comp lain ants ▁$ 1 0 , 0 0 0 ▁in ▁dam ages . ▁ ▁In ▁E ato ck ▁v ▁Bol t ▁[ 2 0 1 1 ] ▁F CA ▁ 1 1 0 3 , ▁the ▁Federal ▁Court ▁of ▁Australia ▁held ▁that ▁newspaper ▁comment ator ▁Andrew ▁Bol t ▁had ▁contra ven ed ▁section ▁ 1 8 C ▁for ▁comments ▁made ▁in ▁relation ▁to ▁fair - sk inned ▁Ab original ▁persons . ▁ ▁In ▁Prior ▁v ▁Queensland ▁University ▁of ▁Technology ▁& ▁O thers ▁[ 2 0 1 6 ] ▁F CC A ▁ 2 8 5 3 , ▁the ▁Federal ▁Circ uit ▁Court ▁of ▁Australia ▁summar ily ▁dismiss ed ▁a ▁claim ▁brought ▁by ▁an ▁ind igen ous ▁staff ▁member ▁at ▁the ▁Queensland ▁University ▁Technology ▁against ▁certain ▁students ▁for ▁comments ▁made ▁on ▁Facebook ▁after ▁one ▁of ▁them ▁had ▁been ▁ev icted ▁from ▁a ▁computer ▁room ▁set ▁aside ▁for ▁ind igen ous ▁students , ▁on ▁the ▁basis ▁that ▁the ▁claim ▁had ▁no ▁reasonable ▁prospect s ▁of ▁success . ▁ ▁Comp la int ▁process ▁and ▁rem ed ies ▁ ▁An ▁ag gr ieved ▁person ▁may ▁make ▁a ▁compla int ▁of ▁a ▁contra vention ▁of ▁the ▁R DA ▁to ▁the ▁Australian ▁Human ▁Rights ▁Commission . ▁If ▁the ▁compla int ▁cannot ▁be ▁resolved , ▁then ▁an ▁application ▁alleg ing ▁" un law ful ▁disc rim ination " ▁may ▁be ▁made ▁to ▁the ▁Federal ▁Court ▁of ▁Australia ▁or ▁to ▁the ▁Federal ▁Circ uit ▁Court . ▁When