▁W inn ie ▁Mand ela , ▁who ▁he ▁represented ▁during ▁the ▁St om pie ▁Mo ek et si ▁kid n apping ▁trial . ▁ ▁Nelson ▁Mand ela ▁law suit ▁ ▁Is mail ▁Ay ob ▁was ▁asked ▁by ▁Nelson ▁Mand ela ▁in ▁May ▁ 2 0 0 5 ▁to ▁stop ▁s elling ▁certain ▁prints ▁signed ▁by ▁Mr ▁Mand ela ▁and ▁also ▁to ▁account ▁for ▁the ▁proceed s ▁of ▁the ▁sales ▁of ▁these ▁prints ▁in ▁a ▁prom in ently ▁public ised ▁application ▁to ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁of ▁South ▁Africa . ▁ ▁Mr ▁Ay ob ▁respond ed ▁that ▁he ▁never ▁sold ▁any ▁prints ▁but ▁had ▁acted ▁only ▁in ▁a ▁professional ▁capacity ▁as ▁Att orney ▁and ▁agent ▁for ▁Mr ▁Mand ela ▁and ▁his ▁family . ▁Under ▁o ath ▁he ▁said ▁that ▁he ▁had ▁never ▁sold ▁any ▁prints ▁nor ▁was ▁he ▁a ▁partner ▁of ▁anyone ▁s elling ▁prints . ▁In ▁terms ▁of ▁the ▁written ▁contract s , ▁Ay ob ▁was ▁to ▁receive ▁roy alt ies ▁due ▁to ▁the ▁Mand ela ▁family . ▁These ▁roy alt ies ▁were ▁received ▁from ▁time ▁to ▁time ▁and ▁were ▁held ▁in ▁the ▁Mand ela ▁company ▁accounts ▁under ▁his ▁control ; ▁he ▁gave ▁a ▁full ▁account ing ▁with ▁an ▁explanation . ▁ ▁Mr ▁Ay ob ▁denied ▁any ▁wrong do ing , ▁and ▁declared ▁that ▁he ▁was ▁the ▁victim ▁of ▁a ▁sm ear ▁campaign ▁orch estr ated ▁by ▁Mr ▁Mand ela ' s ▁advis ors , ▁in ▁particular ▁lawyer ▁George ▁B iz os . ▁One ▁particular ▁issue ▁was ▁the ▁drawing ▁up ▁of ▁a ▁last ▁will