het or ical ▁choice . ▁Robin ▁West , ▁professor ▁of ▁law ▁and ▁philosophy ▁at ▁Ge or get own , ▁explains ▁that ▁" pro - choice " ▁court ▁cases ▁may ▁have ▁been ▁lost ▁because ▁of ▁how ▁the ▁issue ▁was ▁fr amed . ▁For ▁instance , ▁she ▁arg ues ▁that ▁" right s " ▁r het or ic ▁gives ▁courts , ▁specifically ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court , ▁immense ▁r het or ical ▁power . ▁Re product ive ▁" he alth " ▁often ▁places ▁power ▁in ▁the ▁hands ▁of ▁do ctors , ▁medical ▁profession als , ▁and ▁ability ▁to ▁access ▁clin ics . ▁In ▁this ▁view , ▁" right s " ▁and ▁" he alth " ▁both ▁refer ▁to ▁power ▁being ▁given ▁to ▁the ▁people ▁from ▁a ▁top - down ▁perspective . ▁As ▁a ▁response , ▁the ▁" just ice " ▁frame ▁is ▁meant ▁to ▁put ▁power ▁back ▁into ▁the ▁hands ▁of ▁the ▁people . ▁ ▁Although ▁distinct ▁from ▁pro - choice ▁frameworks , ▁re product ive ▁justice ▁advoc ates ▁typically ▁rely ▁on ▁narr ative ▁as ▁a ▁r het or ical ▁strategy ▁to ▁mobil ize ▁cons ensus . ▁These ▁narr atives ▁central ize ▁women ' s ▁stories ▁and ▁decision - making , ▁similar ▁to ▁T iller ' s ▁" Tr ust ▁Women " ▁argument ▁mentioned ▁above . ▁N arr atives ▁re lying ▁on ▁public ▁memory ▁of ▁femin ist ▁movements ▁and ▁link ▁women ' s ▁stories ▁across ▁time ▁and ▁space . ▁N arr atives ▁also ▁explain ▁why ▁people ▁are ▁organ izing . ▁N arr atives ▁are ▁used ▁because