▁the ▁stat ute ▁of ▁limitations ▁had ▁not ▁exp ired ▁on ▁any ▁of ▁Andrew s ’ ▁claims . ▁ ▁TR W ▁appe aled ▁to ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁ ▁Op in ion ▁of ▁the ▁court ▁The ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁revers ed ▁the ▁N inth ▁Circ uit ’ s ▁decision , ▁stating ▁that ▁the ▁N inth ▁Circ uit ▁“ con sp ic u ously ▁over st ated ” ▁the ▁scope ▁and ▁force ▁of ▁the ▁pres umption ▁that ▁general ▁discovery ▁rules ▁apply ▁unless ▁Congress ▁has ▁express ly ▁legisl ated ▁otherwise . ▁ ▁The ▁Court ▁said ▁that ▁while ▁some ▁lower ▁federal ▁courts ▁have ▁applied ▁a ▁general ▁discovery ▁rule ▁when ▁a ▁stat ute ▁is ▁silent ▁on ▁the ▁issue , ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁has ▁not ▁adopted ▁that ▁position . ▁Furthermore , ▁the ▁Court ▁stated ▁that ▁it ▁had ▁“ ne ver ▁end ors ed ▁the ▁N inth ▁Circ uit ’ s ▁view ▁that ▁Congress ▁can ▁convey ▁its ▁ref us al ▁to ▁adopt ▁a ▁discovery ▁rule ▁only ▁by ▁explicit ▁command , ▁rather ▁than ▁by ▁imp lication ▁from ▁the ▁structure ▁or ▁text ▁of ▁the ▁particular ▁ ▁stat ute .” ▁▁▁ ▁While ▁the ▁N inth ▁Circ uit ▁correctly ▁noted ▁that ▁the ▁Fair ▁Cred it ▁Report ing ▁Act ▁contains ▁no ▁specific ▁directive ▁against ▁the ▁application ▁of ▁general ▁federal ▁discovery ▁rules , ▁the ▁Court ▁noted ▁that ▁the ▁stat ute ▁does ▁set ▁forth ▁a ▁specific ▁stat ute ▁of ▁limitations , ▁along ▁with ▁a ▁single ▁exception ▁to ▁the ▁general ▁rule . ▁Based ▁upon ▁the ▁text ▁and ▁structure ▁of ▁the ▁stat ute ▁in ▁question , ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁determined ▁that