▁lost ▁move ▁on ▁either ▁side ; ▁we ▁cannot , ▁therefore , ▁avoid ▁protest ing ▁against ▁the ▁err one ous ▁doctrine ▁laid ▁down ▁by ▁Phil idor ▁and ▁others , ▁that ▁he ▁who ▁has ▁the ▁first ▁move , ▁ought ▁to ▁win ▁the ▁game ▁in ▁consequence ▁of ▁that ▁advantage . ▁We ▁proceed ▁to ▁prove , ▁from ▁the ▁very ▁games ▁ad du ced ▁by ▁Phil idor ▁in ▁support ▁of ▁his ▁position , ▁these ▁three ▁important ▁points . ▁First ly , ▁that ▁the ▁move ▁alone ▁can ▁never ▁be ▁considered ▁a ▁sufficient ▁advantage ▁to ▁ins ure ▁success ▁: ▁Second ly , ▁that ▁he ▁who ▁has ▁not ▁the ▁move , ▁will ▁very ▁soon ▁ac quire ▁it , ▁or ▁neutral ize ▁its ▁effects ; ▁and , ▁Last ly , ▁that ▁supp osing ▁each ▁move ▁to ▁be ▁the ▁best ▁that ▁could ▁possibly ▁be ▁played , ▁the ▁game ▁ought ▁to ▁be ▁drawn . ▁ ▁Games ▁from ▁the ▁Tra ité ▁ ▁The ▁games ▁of ▁the ▁Tra ité ▁des ▁Am ateurs ▁are ▁rare , ▁and ▁cannot ▁be ▁found ▁in ▁common ▁ch ess ▁databases ▁like ▁Ch ess Base , ▁ 3 6 5 ch ess , ▁ch ess bit es ▁or ▁ch ess lab . ▁Some ▁of ▁them ▁( from ▁Chapter ▁ 4 , ▁" G ames ▁where ▁no ▁odd s ▁were ▁given ") ▁are ▁reported ▁here , ▁with ▁the ▁original ▁comments . ▁ ▁Game ▁ 3 ▁in ▁Chapter ▁ 4 , ▁Section ▁ 1 : ▁ 1 . ▁e 4 ▁e 5 ▁ 2 . ▁N f 3 ▁d 6 ▁ 3 . ▁d 4