D ▁was ▁allowed ▁to ▁build ▁an ▁extension ▁from ▁Red car ▁to ▁Salt burn ▁but ▁was ▁not ▁allowed ▁to ▁build ▁a ▁new ▁bridge ▁across ▁the ▁Te es . ▁An ▁Act ▁perm itting ▁the ▁construction ▁of ▁the ▁railway ▁was ▁passed ▁in ▁July ▁ 1 8 5 8 . ▁The ▁company ▁was ▁capital ised ▁with ▁£ 1 2 0 , 0 0 0 , ▁half ▁of ▁which ▁came ▁from ▁the ▁WH H & R , ▁with ▁Ward ▁Jackson ▁as ▁its ▁first ▁chairman . ▁ ▁Ext ension ▁of ▁the ▁line ▁to ▁Norman by ▁ ▁Ward ▁Jackson ▁continued ▁to ▁seek ▁independence ▁from ▁the ▁M & GR ▁and ▁put ▁forward ▁a ▁fresh ▁proposal ▁in ▁ 1 8 5 9 ▁to ▁extend ▁the ▁line ▁from ▁Gu is borough ▁to ▁the ▁Te es ▁at ▁C argo ▁Fle et , ▁so ▁that ▁the ▁increasing ▁demand ▁for ▁iron ▁ore ▁ship ments ▁to ▁T yn es ide ▁could ▁more ▁easily ▁be ▁met . ▁The ▁S & D ▁again ▁opposed ▁it . ▁Although ▁the ▁House ▁of ▁Commons ▁un anim ously ▁approved ▁the ▁Cleveland ▁Ext ension ▁Bill , ▁it ▁was ▁rejected ▁by ▁the ▁House ▁of ▁L ords . ▁However , ▁this ▁left ▁the ▁door ▁open ▁for ▁a ▁private ▁railway ▁on ▁the ▁lands ▁owned ▁by ▁Ward ▁Jackson ▁and ▁his ▁supp or ters . ▁They ▁began ▁to ▁construct ▁it ▁in ▁ 1 8 6 0 ▁under ▁the ▁aus p ices ▁of ▁the ▁" U ps all , ▁Norman by ▁and ▁Or mes by ▁Railway ". ▁Once ▁again , ▁the ▁S & D ▁opposed ▁it , ▁this ▁time ▁on