▁evidence , ▁problem atic ▁data ▁collection , ▁weak ▁statistical ▁calculations ▁and ▁relationships , ▁and ▁many ▁others . ▁ ▁The ▁paper ▁was ▁problem atic ▁even ▁among ▁Put hoff ▁and ▁T arg ' s ▁colle agues ▁at ▁S RI . ▁Two ▁other ▁scient ists ▁also ▁worked ▁on ▁tests ▁that ▁involved ▁G eller ▁and ▁other ▁remote ▁view ing ▁subjects . ▁Charles ▁Re bert , ▁an ▁expert ▁on ▁electro ence phal ography ▁( E EG ), ▁and ▁Leon ▁Ot is , ▁a ▁psych ologist , ▁held ▁much ▁more ▁strictly ▁to ▁rig id ▁scientific ▁methods ▁during ▁the ▁tests ▁with ▁which ▁they ▁were ▁associated . ▁ ▁Re bert ▁and ▁Ot is ▁went ▁so ▁far ▁as ▁to ▁document ▁their ▁ob jections ▁to ▁what ▁they ▁term ed ▁as ▁" fra ud ul ent ▁and ▁sli ps hod " ▁work ▁and ▁to ▁demand ▁that ▁any ▁experiments ▁they ▁had ▁been ▁involved ▁in ▁be ▁str icken ▁from ▁the ▁paper ▁before ▁publication . ▁ ▁Despite ▁the ▁editor ial ▁disc laim ers ▁published ▁in ▁the ▁same ▁issue ▁as ▁Put hoff ▁and ▁T arg ' s ▁paper , ▁their ▁most ▁famous ▁test ▁subject , ▁Uri ▁G eller , ▁continues ▁to ▁tout ▁the ▁publication ▁of ▁these ▁experiments ▁in ▁the ▁respect ed ▁journal ▁as ▁evidence ▁of ▁his ▁claims ▁of ▁psych ic ▁powers . ▁ ▁Rep lication ▁studies ▁Vari ous ▁attempts ▁to ▁rep licate ▁the ▁remote ▁view ing ▁find ings ▁were ▁carried ▁out ▁from ▁the ▁mid - 1 9 7 0 s ▁until ▁the ▁ 1 9 9 0 s . ▁Several ▁of ▁these ▁follow - up ▁studies , ▁which