▁country ▁where ▁it ▁is ▁known ▁that ▁buried ▁arch ae ology ▁is ▁likely ▁to ▁surv ive . ▁They ▁are ▁primarily ▁created ▁and ▁used ▁in ▁the ▁planning ▁process ▁at ▁act ▁as ▁triggers ▁that ▁can ▁alert ▁planning ▁officers ▁to ▁possible ▁arch ae ological ▁disturb ance ▁caused ▁by ▁proposed ▁new ▁development . ▁They ▁are ▁often ▁marked ▁out ▁on ▁G IS ▁databases ▁and ▁any ▁application ▁for ▁development ▁within ▁them ▁is ▁likely ▁to ▁be ▁referred ▁to ▁the ▁county ▁arch ae ologist ▁for ▁comment ▁and ▁advice . ▁This ▁process ▁is ▁in ▁keeping ▁with ▁the ▁UK ▁government ▁gu idel ines ▁on ▁arch ae ology ▁and ▁planning , ▁known ▁as ▁P PG ▁ 1 6 . ▁ ▁Development ▁in ▁an ▁area ▁of ▁arch ae ological ▁potential ▁is ▁likely ▁to ▁require ▁arch ae ological ▁evaluation ▁and ▁possible ▁mit ig ation ▁work ▁in ▁advance ▁of ▁building ▁comm encing . ▁The ▁areas ▁are ▁selected ▁through ▁study ▁of ▁past ▁exc av ation ▁work ▁and ▁historical ▁and ▁academic ▁sources ▁including ▁each ▁county ' s ▁S ites ▁and ▁Mon uments ▁Record . ▁ ▁The ▁compar able ▁term ▁used ▁in ▁Australian ▁arch ae ology ▁is ▁potential ▁arch ae ological ▁depos it ▁( P AD ). ▁ ▁This ▁was ▁initially ▁used ▁in ▁arch ae ological ▁survey ▁to ▁distinguish ▁rock ▁sh el ters ▁that ▁were ▁likely ▁to ▁contain ▁arch ae ological ▁depos it ▁on ▁the ▁basis ▁of ▁gross ▁site ▁characteristics , ▁versus ▁those ▁unlikely ▁to ▁contain ▁cultural ▁depos its , ▁and ▁those ▁with ▁visible ▁arte fact ual ▁material ▁on ▁the ▁surface ▁of ▁the ▁shelter ▁floor . ▁ ▁During ▁the ▁ 1