▁and ▁clar ity , ▁and ▁un just ifi ably ▁inter fer es ▁with ▁freedom ▁of ▁speech ▁by ▁extending ▁to ▁speech ▁that ▁is ▁reason ably ▁likely ▁to ▁‘ off end ’ ." ▁The ▁AL RC ▁noted ▁that ▁it ▁had ▁received ▁" wid ely ▁diver gent ▁views " ▁on ▁whether ▁s ▁ 1 8 C ▁should ▁be ▁am ended ▁but ▁found ▁as ▁follows :" In ▁the ▁AL RC ’ s ▁view , ▁s ▁ 1 8 C ▁of ▁the ▁R DA ▁would ▁benefit ▁from ▁more ▁thorough ▁review ▁in ▁relation ▁to ▁imp lications ▁for ▁freedom ▁of ▁speech . ▁In ▁particular , ▁there ▁are ▁arguments ▁that ▁s ▁ 1 8 C ▁la cks ▁sufficient ▁precision ▁and ▁clar ity , ▁and ▁un just ifi ably ▁inter fer es ▁with ▁freedom ▁of ▁speech ▁by ▁extending ▁to ▁speech ▁that ▁is ▁reason ably ▁likely ▁to ▁‘ off end ’ . ▁In ▁some ▁respect s , ▁the ▁provision ▁is ▁bro ader ▁than ▁is ▁required ▁under ▁international ▁law , ▁bro ader ▁than ▁similar ▁laws ▁in ▁other ▁juris dict ions , ▁and ▁may ▁be ▁sus cept ible ▁to ▁constitution al ▁challenge ." ▁In ▁ 2 0 1 6 , ▁Labor ▁Senator ▁Kim ber ley ▁K itch ing , ▁said ▁she ▁was ▁" very ▁surprised " ▁when ▁Justice ▁B rom berg ▁decided ▁to ▁hear ▁the ▁Bol t ▁case ▁given , ▁“ He ▁was ▁an ▁active ▁A LP ▁person , ▁he ▁was ▁active ▁enough ▁that ▁he ▁was ▁in ▁a ▁fa ction , ▁he ▁ran ▁for ▁pr ese lection ... ▁Obviously ▁he ▁would ▁have ▁had ▁some ▁views