▁not ▁ins ist ▁upon ▁a ▁tight ▁party ▁line . ▁That ▁permitted ▁a ▁period ▁of ▁harm ony ▁within ▁the ▁SD AP ▁between ▁ 1 8 9 4 ▁and ▁ 1 9 0 0 . ▁ ▁Both ▁within ▁and ▁outside ▁parliament , ▁the ▁SD AP ▁proved ▁to ▁be ▁a ▁powerful ▁force , ▁despite ▁its ▁relatively ▁small ▁representation ▁in ▁the ▁House ▁of ▁Representatives . ▁However , ▁the ▁social ists ▁felt ▁a ▁moral ▁advantage ▁because ▁parliament ▁was ▁hardly ▁an ▁accurate ▁representation ▁of ▁the ▁people , ▁and ▁they ▁used ▁their ▁possibilities ▁to ▁the ▁full , ▁among ▁other ▁things ▁by ▁fil ib ust ering ▁( each ▁representative ▁had ▁un limited ▁speaking ▁time ). ▁When , ▁in ▁ 1 9 1 1 ▁a ▁majority ▁of ▁parliament ▁refused ▁to ▁vote ▁on ▁an ▁SD AP ▁motion , ▁the ▁anger ▁of ▁the ▁party ▁was ▁expressed ▁by ▁one ▁of ▁its ▁most ▁fier y ▁speak ers , ▁: ▁In ▁that ▁case , ▁the ▁in k well s ▁will ▁fly ▁through ▁the ▁room .... ▁I ▁cannot ▁be ▁held ▁account able ▁for ▁anything . ▁I ▁ass ure ▁you , ▁we ▁will ▁start ▁throwing ▁ch airs . The ▁ant agon ism ▁between ▁the ▁SD AP ▁and ▁more ▁conserv ative ▁forces ▁would ▁cause ▁bit tern ess ▁for ▁a ▁long ▁time ▁afterwards ▁and ▁also ▁explains ▁many ▁of ▁Tro el stra ' s ▁actions . ▁▁ 1 9 1 3 ▁elections ▁and ▁universal ▁suff rage ▁Tro el stra ' s ▁biggest ▁political ▁issue ▁was ▁universal ▁suff rage ▁in ▁the ▁Netherlands . ▁This ▁struggle ▁reached ▁its ▁clim ax ▁in ▁ 1 9