2 0 0 1 , ▁direct ing ▁the ▁administration ▁to ▁take ▁steps ▁to ▁protect ▁the ▁Jar awa ▁from ▁enc ro achment ▁and ▁contact , ▁as ▁well ▁as ▁pre empt ively ▁r uling ▁out ▁any ▁program ▁that ▁involved ▁re loc ating ▁the ▁Jar awa ▁to ▁a ▁new ▁res ervation . ▁Pl anned ▁extensions ▁of ▁the ▁highway ▁were ▁also ▁prohib ited ▁by ▁the ▁court . ▁However , ▁the ▁Light ▁of ▁And am ans ▁editor ial ised ▁that ▁the ▁changes ▁to ▁the ▁Jar awa ▁were ▁likely ▁irre vers ible ▁and ▁should ▁have ▁been ▁ass essed ▁more ▁thoroughly ▁before ▁the ▁road ▁was ▁built . ▁ ▁Imp act ▁of ▁tour ism ▁A ▁major ▁problem ▁is ▁the ▁volume ▁of ▁sight see ing ▁t ours ▁that ▁are ▁operated ▁by ▁private ▁companies , ▁where ▁tour ists ▁view , ▁photograph ▁or ▁otherwise ▁attempt ▁interactions ▁with ▁Jar aw as , ▁who ▁are ▁often ▁begg ing ▁by ▁the ▁highway . ▁These ▁are ▁illegal ▁under ▁Indian ▁law , ▁and ▁in ▁March ▁ 2 0 0 8 , ▁the ▁Tour ism ▁Department ▁of ▁the ▁And aman ▁and ▁Nic obar ▁administration ▁issued ▁a ▁fresh ▁warning ▁to ▁tour ▁operators ▁that ▁attempting ▁contact ▁with ▁Jar aw as , ▁photograph ing ▁them , ▁stopping ▁vehicles ▁while ▁trans iting ▁through ▁their ▁land ▁or ▁offering ▁them ▁r ides ▁were ▁prohib ited ▁under ▁the ▁Prote ction ▁of ▁Ab original ▁Trib es ▁Reg ulation , ▁ 1 9 5 6 ▁and ▁would ▁be ▁pro sec uted ▁under ▁a ▁strict ▁interpretation ▁of ▁the ▁stat ute . ▁It ▁has ▁been ▁alleg ed , ▁however , ▁that