▁in ▁which ▁she ▁claimed ▁that ▁" W omen ’ s ▁Su ff rage ▁is ▁essentially ▁a ▁Liberal ▁principle ", ▁Florence ▁Con y be are ▁( aka : ▁Mrs ▁C . A . V . ▁Con y be are ) ▁wrote ▁a ▁reply ▁to ▁an ▁article ▁written ▁by ▁Ed ith ▁C alk in , ▁one ▁of ▁the ▁women ▁critics ▁of ▁Women ' s ▁Su ff rage . ▁She ▁re bu ked ▁C alk in ▁for ▁wanting ▁to ▁den y ▁women ▁political ▁recognition ▁and ▁argued ▁why ▁women ▁should ▁be ▁given ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁vote , ▁and ▁a ired ▁her ▁ob jections ▁to ▁Ed ith ▁C alk in ' s ▁approach ▁to ▁women ' s ▁rights . ▁ ▁The ▁in equ ities ▁of ▁legisl ation ▁ ▁Florence ▁Con y be are ▁referred ▁to ▁Mr ▁Dick enson ' s ▁' W omen ' s ▁Su ff rage ▁Bill ▁of ▁ 1 9 0 7 ' ▁[ ed . ▁Women ’ s ▁En f ranch is ement ▁Bill ], ▁which , ▁if ▁passed , ▁would ▁treat ▁married ▁women ▁as ▁' joint ▁occup ier ' ▁of ▁a ▁dwell ing , ▁and ▁ch ided ▁C alk in ▁for ▁ign oring ▁recent ▁legisl ative ▁develop ments ▁concerning ▁Women ' s ▁Su ff rage . ▁ ▁Con y be are ▁believed ▁that ▁all ▁women ▁should ▁be ▁el ig ible ▁to ▁vote , ▁ir res pective ▁of ▁any ▁' property ▁qual ification '. ▁▁ ▁It ▁was ▁not ▁right ▁that ▁women ▁who ▁paid ▁rates ▁and ▁tax es ▁had ▁no ▁right ▁to ▁decide ▁how ▁money