▁imagination . ▁Hill man ▁has ▁also ▁rejected ▁individ u ation , ▁central ▁to ▁Jung ian ▁psych ology . ▁Wolfgang ▁G ie ger ich ▁arg ues ▁that ▁Hill man ' s ▁work ▁exists ▁in ▁a ▁' b ubble ▁of ▁irre ality ' ▁outside ▁time . ▁It ' s ▁a ▁form ▁of ▁' static ▁Pl aton ism ' ▁imper vious ▁to ▁development al ▁change . ▁In ▁Hill man ' s ▁psych ology , ▁the ▁" imm un isation ▁of ▁the ▁imag inal ▁from ▁the ▁historical ▁process ▁has ▁become ▁inher ent ▁in ▁its ▁very ▁form ." ▁ ▁Hill man ▁cons iders ▁his ▁work ▁as ▁an ▁expression ▁of ▁the ▁' p uer ▁a et ern us ', ▁the ▁et ernal ▁youth ▁of ▁fair y ▁tale ▁who ▁lives ▁in ▁an ▁et ernal ▁dream - state , ▁resist ant ▁to ▁growing ▁up . ▁Yet , ▁David ▁T ace y ▁maintain s ▁that ▁den ial ▁of ▁the ▁m atur ational ▁imp ulse ▁will ▁only ▁lead ▁to ▁it ▁happening ▁anyway ▁but ▁in ▁a ▁negative ▁form . ▁He ▁holds ▁that ▁Hill man ' s ▁model ▁was ▁' un made ' ▁by ▁the ▁missing ▁development al ▁element ▁of ▁his ▁thought : ▁" By ▁throwing ▁out ▁the ▁hero ic ▁pattern ▁of ▁conscious ness , ▁and ▁the ▁idea ▁of ▁individ u ation , ▁Hill man ▁no ▁longer ▁appe aled ▁to ▁most ▁psych olog ists ▁or ▁ther ap ists . ▁By ▁trans gress ing ▁professional ▁eth ics , ▁he ▁no ▁longer ▁appe aled ▁to ▁training ▁instit utes ." ▁ ▁Marie - Lou ise ▁von ▁Franz ▁regards