▁the ▁military ▁commander ▁did ▁not ▁exercise ▁his ▁dis cret ion ▁in ▁a ▁proportion ate ▁manner ▁and ▁that ▁he ▁must ▁alter ▁the ▁route ▁of ▁the ▁f ence ▁in ▁regards ▁to ▁a ▁segment ▁near ▁the ▁Palest in ian ▁village ▁of ▁Bil ' in . ▁In ▁her ▁judgment , ▁Be in isch ▁accepted ▁the ▁military ▁commander ' s ▁claim ▁that ▁the ▁f ence ▁in ▁Bil ' in ▁area ▁was ▁built ▁for ▁reasons ▁of ▁national ▁security . ▁Nevertheless , ▁she ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁military ▁commander ▁had ▁determined ▁the ▁route ▁of ▁the ▁f ence ▁while ▁taking ▁into ▁account ▁the ▁future ▁construction ▁plans ▁for ▁new ▁Isra eli ▁neighborhood s ▁near ▁this ▁area . ▁These ▁planned ▁neighborhood s ▁do ▁not ▁const itute ▁a ▁vital ▁security ▁need , ▁and ▁hence ▁cannot ▁be ▁taken ▁into ▁account ▁when ▁determ ining ▁the ▁route ▁of ▁the ▁f ence . ▁Thus , ▁Be in isch ▁concluded , ▁the ▁route ▁of ▁the ▁f ence ▁in ▁the ▁Bil ' in ▁area ▁did ▁not ▁meet ▁the ▁proportional ity ▁requirement . ▁ ▁In ▁ 2 0 0 7 , ▁a ▁pet ition ▁was ▁brought ▁before ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁regarding ▁the ▁government ' s ▁decision ▁to ▁protect ▁the ▁schools ▁in ▁Isra eli ▁cities ▁from ▁attacks ▁by ▁“ Q ass am ” ▁rock ets ▁fired ▁from ▁the ▁Gaz a ▁St rip . ▁In ▁light ▁of ▁this ▁decision , ▁the ▁authorities ▁adopted ▁a ▁protection ▁plan ▁under ▁which ▁only ▁some ▁of ▁the ▁class rooms ▁were ▁protected . ▁Be in isch ▁ruled ▁that ▁the ▁decision ▁not ▁to ▁fully ▁protect ▁the ▁main ▁class rooms ▁of ▁children