5 ▁December ▁ 2 0 0 3 . ▁ ▁Priv y ▁Council ▁In ▁March ▁ 2 0 0 7 , ▁B ain ' s ▁legal ▁team , ▁including ▁Kar am , ▁travel led ▁to ▁London ▁to ▁lay ▁out ▁nine ▁arguments ▁before ▁the ▁Priv y ▁Council ▁as ▁to ▁why ▁his ▁conv ict ions ▁should ▁be ▁qu ashed . ▁Two ▁of ▁the ▁nine ▁points ▁concerned ▁Robin ' s ▁mental ▁state ▁and ▁possible ▁mot ive . ▁The ▁other ▁seven ▁points ▁concerned ▁questions ▁about ▁particular ▁pieces ▁of ▁evidence . ▁The ▁Priv y ▁Council ▁said ▁there ▁was ▁considerable ▁doubt ▁that ▁B ain ▁would ▁have ▁been ▁conv icted ▁if ▁evidence ▁discovered ▁post - tri al ▁had ▁been ▁put ▁to ▁the ▁j ury . ▁▁ ▁The ▁Priv y ▁Council ▁concluded ▁that : ▁" In ▁the ▁opinion ▁of ▁the ▁board , ▁the ▁fresh ▁evidence ▁ad du ced ▁in ▁relation ▁to ▁the ▁nine ▁points ▁... ▁taken ▁together , ▁comp els ▁the ▁conclusion ▁that ▁a ▁substantial ▁mis car riage ▁of ▁justice ▁has ▁actually ▁occurred ▁in ▁this ▁case ." ▁The ▁Priv y ▁Council ▁qu ashed ▁B ain ' s ▁conv ict ions ▁and ▁ordered ▁a ▁ret rial , ▁but ▁noted ▁that ▁he ▁should ▁remain ▁in ▁cust ody ▁in ▁the ▁mean ▁time . ▁ ▁On ▁ 1 5 ▁May ▁ 2 0 0 7 , ▁B ain ▁was ▁granted ▁b ail ▁by ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁in ▁Christ ch urch . ▁Justice ▁F og art y ▁said ▁that ▁under ▁New ▁Zealand ▁law , ▁there ▁was ▁no ▁reason ▁for ▁continued ▁det ention ▁and ▁he ▁was ▁ba iled