” ▁significantly ▁viol ates ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁personal ▁liberty . ▁While ▁holding ▁the ▁law ▁constitution al , ▁she ▁held ▁that ▁in ▁view ▁of ▁the ▁extent ▁of ▁the ▁viol ation ▁of ▁personal ▁liberty ▁and ▁of ▁the ▁extreme ▁nature ▁of ▁the ▁measure ▁of ▁det ention ▁provided ▁in ▁the ▁law , ▁an ▁interpret ive ▁effort ▁should ▁be ▁made ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁minim ize , ▁in ▁so ▁far ▁as ▁possible , ▁the ▁viol ation ▁of ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁liberty ▁so ▁that ▁it ▁is ▁comm ens ur ate ▁with ▁the ▁need ▁to ▁achieve ▁the ▁security ▁purpose , ▁and ▁not ▁in ▁excess ▁there of . ▁Be in isch ▁also ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁prov isions ▁of ▁the ▁stat ute ▁should ▁be ▁interpreted , ▁in ▁so ▁far ▁as ▁possible , ▁in ▁a ▁manner ▁consistent ▁with ▁the ▁accepted ▁norm s ▁of ▁international ▁law . ▁ ▁In ▁ 2 0 0 9 , ▁Be in isch ▁issued ▁a ▁preced ent - setting ▁r uling ▁on ▁the ▁un const itution al ▁nature ▁of ▁the ▁priv at ization ▁of ▁pr isons . ▁In ▁this ▁jud g ement , ▁a ▁panel ▁of ▁nine ▁just ices ▁led ▁by ▁Be in isch ▁struck ▁down ▁Am end ment ▁ 2 8 ▁to ▁the ▁Pr ison ▁Ord in ance , ▁which ▁calls ▁for ▁the ▁creation ▁of ▁a ▁prison ▁in ▁Israel ▁to ▁be ▁managed ▁and ▁operated ▁by ▁a ▁private ▁corpor ation . ▁She ▁concluded ▁that ▁the ▁Am end ment ▁viol ates ▁the ▁constitution al ▁rights ▁to ▁personal ▁freedom ▁and ▁human ▁dign ity . ▁In ▁her ▁r uling , ▁Be in isch