▁dream ▁cor pus ▁of ▁the ▁three ▁education - level ▁groups ▁accord ed ▁with ▁the ▁relative ▁indices ▁for ▁written ▁Dutch ▁by ▁the ▁three ▁educational - level ▁groups , ▁which ▁were ▁available ▁for ▁comparison .) ▁▁ 7 2 ▁of ▁the ▁ 5 6 6 ▁utter ances ▁were ▁marked ▁by ▁their ▁respective ▁subjects ▁( in ▁response ▁to ▁one ▁of ▁the ▁questions ▁on ▁the ▁form ) ▁as ▁devi ating ▁from ▁w ake ful ▁usage , ▁although ▁analysis ▁of ▁the ▁same ▁spec im ens ▁by ▁two ▁academic ▁lingu ists ▁de emed ▁the ▁large ▁majority ▁of ▁those ▁marked ▁utter ances ▁to ▁be ▁fully ▁acceptable ▁Dutch . ▁Fe wer ▁than ▁ 5 ▁percent ▁of ▁all ▁utter ances ▁clearly ▁devi ated ▁from ▁correct ▁w ake ful ▁speech . ▁These ▁included ▁semantic ▁anom al ies , ▁fault y ▁lex ical ▁substitution s , ▁ne olog isms ▁( word - bl ends ), ▁non - ex istent ▁proper ▁names , ▁language ▁mixing , ▁and ▁( in ▁two ▁instances ) ▁s ynt actic ▁errors . ▁ ▁Prag m atic ▁compet ence ▁The ▁subjects ▁in ▁the ▁above ▁experiment ▁were ▁not ▁asked ▁to ▁report ▁the ▁full ▁dream ▁scenario ▁during ▁which ▁the ▁utter ances ▁were ▁made . ▁Ex cluded , ▁therefore , ▁from ▁the ▁analysis ▁was ▁any ▁consideration ▁of ▁" p rag m atic ▁compet ence ," ▁the ▁" know ledge ▁of ▁condition ▁and ▁manner ▁or ▁appropriate ▁use ▁[ of ▁his ▁or ▁her ▁lingu istic ▁ability ] ▁in ▁conform ity ▁with ▁various ▁purposes ," ▁which ▁forms ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁bro ader ▁field ▁of ▁language ▁psych ology ▁(