▁law ▁and ▁imp lications ▁for ▁legal ▁processes ▁that ▁may ▁be ▁dedu ced ▁from ▁these ▁find ings ▁are ▁that : ▁Any ▁matters ▁brought ▁before ▁a ▁Court ▁of ▁Law ▁should ▁be ▁determined ▁by ▁the ▁facts , ▁not ▁by ▁supp os itions ▁attached ▁to ▁a ▁label ▁describing ▁a ▁behavior , ▁i . e ., ▁M SB P / F II / F DB P ; ▁M SB P / F II / F DB P ▁is ▁not ▁a ▁mental ▁dis order ▁( i . e ., ▁not ▁defined ▁as ▁such ▁in ▁D SM ▁IV ), ▁and ▁the ▁evidence ▁of ▁a ▁psych iat rist ▁should ▁not ▁therefore ▁be ▁adm iss ible ; ▁M SB P / F II / F DB P ▁has ▁been ▁stated ▁to ▁be ▁a ▁behavior ▁describing ▁a ▁form ▁of ▁child ▁ab use ▁and ▁not ▁a ▁medical ▁diagn osis ▁of ▁either ▁a ▁parent ▁or ▁a ▁child . ▁A ▁medical ▁pract ition er ▁cannot ▁therefore ▁state ▁that ▁a ▁person ▁" su ff ers " ▁from ▁M SB P / F II / F DB P , ▁and ▁such ▁evidence ▁should ▁also ▁therefore ▁be ▁in ad miss ible . ▁The ▁evidence ▁of ▁a ▁medical ▁pract ition er ▁should ▁be ▁conf ined ▁to ▁what ▁they ▁observed ▁and ▁heard ▁and ▁what ▁for ens ic ▁information ▁was ▁found ▁by ▁recognized ▁medical ▁investig ative ▁procedures ; ▁A ▁label ▁used ▁to ▁describe ▁a ▁behavior ▁is ▁not ▁helpful ▁in ▁determ ining ▁gu ilt ▁and ▁is ▁pre jud icial . ▁By ▁applying ▁an ▁ambigu ous ▁label ▁of ▁M SB P / F II