▁do ▁not ▁then ▁independently ▁review ▁the ▁record ▁for ▁error , ▁the ▁argument ▁being ▁that ▁Anders ▁does ▁not ▁trigger ▁the ▁court ▁to ▁do ▁so ▁unless ▁the ▁att orney ▁moves ▁to ▁withdraw , ▁which ▁Id aho ▁has ▁chosen ▁not ▁to ▁permit . ▁ ▁New ▁Ham pshire ▁also ▁does ▁not ▁permit ▁withdraw al , ▁but ▁specifically ▁ex empt s ▁a ▁potentially ▁f riv ol ous ▁appeal ▁from ▁being ▁subject ▁to ▁att orney ▁san ctions . ▁ ▁North ▁Dak ota ▁has ▁taken ▁a ▁different ▁approach : ▁it ▁allows ▁an ▁att orney ▁to ▁withdraw ▁but ▁then ▁assign s ▁a ▁different ▁att orney ▁to ▁the ▁case ▁so ▁the ▁def endant ▁has ▁coun sel ▁if ▁desired . ▁ ▁California ▁no ▁longer ▁requires ▁the ▁att orney ▁to ▁withdraw . ▁Now ▁she ▁or ▁he ▁may ▁submit ▁a ▁" W ende ▁Br ief ", ▁named ▁after ▁the ▁case ▁in ▁which ▁the ▁procedure ▁was ▁approved . ▁ ▁States ▁expand ing ▁Anders ▁Though ▁Anders ▁itself ▁applies ▁only ▁to ▁criminal ▁proceed ings , ▁at ▁least ▁one ▁state ▁has ▁expanded ▁its ▁holding ▁to ▁include ▁other ▁types ▁of ▁cases . ▁ ▁The ▁Ark ansas ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁has ▁applied ▁Anders ▁by ▁case ▁law ▁to ▁family ▁law ▁cases ▁involving ▁term ination ▁of ▁parent al ▁rights ▁and ▁to ▁adult ▁protect ive ▁cust ody ▁cases , ▁and ▁by ▁its ▁own ▁rules ▁to ▁ju ven ile ▁del in quency ▁and ▁invol unt ary ▁commit ment ▁cases . ▁ ▁See ▁also ▁ ▁Pennsylvania ▁v . ▁Fin ley ▁( 1 9 8 7 ) ▁ ▁References ▁ ▁External ▁links ▁▁▁ ▁Category : Un ited ▁States