▁size ▁has ▁a ▁cur vil ine ar ▁effect , ▁since ▁at ▁low ▁numbers , ▁govern ance ▁groups ▁may ▁also ▁not ▁have ▁the ▁person - power ▁to ▁effectively ▁research , ▁manage , ▁and ▁admin ister ▁the ▁resource ▁system ▁or ▁the ▁govern ance ▁process . ▁ ▁Another ▁proposed ▁boundary ▁solution ▁is ▁to ▁remove ▁the ▁social ▁from ▁the ▁d ile m ma , ▁by ▁means ▁of ▁priv at ization . ▁This ▁rest ruct uring ▁of ▁in cent ives ▁would ▁remove ▁the ▁tempt ation ▁to ▁place ▁individual ▁needs ▁above ▁group ▁needs . ▁However , ▁it ▁is ▁not ▁easy ▁to ▁priv at ize ▁move able ▁resources ▁such ▁as ▁fish , ▁water , ▁and ▁clean ▁air . ▁Priv at ization ▁also ▁ra ises ▁concerns ▁about ▁social ▁justice ▁as ▁not ▁everyone ▁may ▁be ▁able ▁to ▁get ▁an ▁equal ▁share . ▁Priv at ization ▁might ▁also ▁er ode ▁people ' s ▁intr insic ▁motiv ation ▁to ▁co oper ate , ▁by ▁external izing ▁the ▁loc us ▁of ▁control . ▁ ▁In ▁society , ▁social ▁units ▁which ▁face ▁a ▁social ▁d ile m ma ▁within ▁are ▁typically ▁embedded ▁in ▁interaction ▁with ▁other ▁groups , ▁often ▁competition ▁for ▁resources ▁of ▁different ▁kinds . ▁Once ▁this ▁is ▁mode led ▁the ▁social ▁d ile m ma ▁is ▁strongly ▁at ten u ated . ▁ ▁There ▁are ▁many ▁additional ▁struct ural ▁solutions ▁which ▁modify ▁the ▁social ▁d ile m ma , ▁both ▁from ▁the ▁inside ▁and ▁from ▁the ▁outside . ▁The ▁lik elihood ▁of ▁successfully ▁co - man aging ▁a ▁shared ▁resource , ▁successfully ▁organ izing