▁or ▁rare ▁diagn oses , ▁thus ▁alloc ating ▁even ▁more ▁time ▁to ▁the ▁child ▁and ▁the ▁ab user . ▁Even ▁without ▁prompt ing , ▁medical ▁profession als ▁may ▁be ▁easily ▁s edu ced ▁into ▁pres cri bing ▁di agnostic ▁tests ▁and ▁ther ap ies ▁that ▁are ▁at ▁best ▁un com fort able ▁and ▁cost ly , ▁and ▁at ▁worst ▁potentially ▁inj ur ious ▁to ▁the ▁child . ▁If ▁the ▁health ▁pract ition er ▁res ists ▁ordering ▁further ▁tests , ▁dru gs , ▁procedures , ▁sur ger ies , ▁or ▁special ists , ▁the ▁F DI A ▁ab user ▁makes ▁the ▁medical ▁system ▁appear ▁neg lig ent ▁for ▁ref using ▁to ▁help ▁a ▁sick ▁child ▁and ▁their ▁self less ▁parent . ▁Like ▁those ▁with ▁M unch aus en ▁synd rome , ▁F DI A ▁perpet rat ors ▁are ▁known ▁to ▁switch ▁medical ▁prov iders ▁frequently ▁until ▁they ▁find ▁one ▁that ▁is ▁willing ▁to ▁meet ▁their ▁level ▁of ▁need ; ▁this ▁practice ▁is ▁known ▁as ▁" do ctor ▁sho pping " ▁or ▁" h ospital ▁ho pping ". ▁ ▁The ▁perpet r ator ▁continues ▁the ▁ab use ▁because ▁maintain ing ▁the ▁child ▁in ▁the ▁role ▁of ▁patient ▁satisfies ▁the ▁ab user ' s ▁needs . ▁The ▁c ure ▁for ▁the ▁victim ▁is ▁to ▁separate ▁the ▁child ▁completely ▁from ▁the ▁ab user . ▁When ▁parent al ▁vis its ▁are ▁allowed , ▁sometimes ▁there ▁is ▁a ▁dis astr ous ▁outcome ▁for ▁the ▁child . ▁Even ▁when ▁the ▁child ▁is ▁removed , ▁the ▁perpet r ator ▁may ▁then