▁[ and ] ▁... ▁subst it utes ▁its ▁own ▁social ▁theories ▁for ▁the ▁plain ▁meaning ▁of ▁the ▁specific ▁constitution al ▁text ", ▁he ▁wrote . ▁Van ▁Ho om issen ▁also ▁noted ▁that ▁if ▁the ▁pl ur ality ▁needed ▁guidance ▁as ▁to ▁whether ▁the ▁citizens ▁of ▁Oregon ▁had ▁emb rac ed ▁an ▁expectation ▁of ▁priv acy ▁around ▁growing ▁mar iju ana , ▁the ▁failure ▁of ▁a ▁ 1 9 8 6 ▁ball ot ▁measure ▁that ▁would ▁have ▁dec riminal ized ▁the ▁drug ▁suggested ▁otherwise . ▁ ▁A ▁shorter ▁diss ent ▁was ▁written ▁by ▁Judge ▁Kurt ▁Ross man , ▁joined ▁by ▁Mary ▁De its . ▁While ▁he ▁agreed ▁with ▁the ▁pl ur ality ▁that ▁the ▁state ▁constitution ▁was ▁not ▁meant ▁to ▁be ▁read ▁in ▁a ▁narrow ly ▁literal ▁manner , ▁and ▁with ▁the ▁special ▁conc urrence ' s ▁criticism ▁of ▁the ▁pl ur ality ' s ▁dis reg ard ▁of ▁preced ent , ▁he ▁believed ▁that ▁the ▁defend ants ▁had ▁not ▁established ▁that ▁they ▁had ▁a ▁reasonable ▁expectation ▁of ▁priv acy , ▁since ▁the ▁sign age ▁that ▁the ▁deput ies ▁passed ▁simply ▁said ▁" No ▁hunting " ▁rather ▁than ▁" No ▁tres pass ing " ▁and ▁the ▁fel led ▁tree ▁merely ▁sign aled ▁an ▁intent ▁to ▁d eter ▁vehicles , ▁not ▁foot ▁traffic ; ▁thus ▁the ▁deput ies ▁could ▁reason ably ▁have ▁believed ▁they ▁were ▁still ▁on ▁l umber ▁company ▁land . ▁" It ▁is ▁unnecessary ▁to ▁sail ▁into ▁un chart ed ▁waters ▁by ▁form ulating ▁a ▁new , ▁un test ed ▁constitution al ▁analysis