▁for ▁human ▁well - be ing ▁as ▁opposed ▁to ▁for ▁its ▁own ▁sake . ▁The ▁problem ▁with ▁a ▁" sh allow " ▁view point ▁is ▁not ▁that ▁it ▁is ▁human - cent red ▁but ▁that ▁according ▁to ▁William ▁Grey : ▁" What ' s ▁wrong ▁with ▁shall ow ▁views ▁is ▁not ▁their ▁concern ▁about ▁the ▁well - be ing ▁of ▁humans , ▁but ▁that ▁they ▁do ▁not ▁really ▁consider ▁enough ▁in ▁what ▁that ▁well - be ing ▁consists . ▁According ▁to ▁this ▁view , ▁we ▁need ▁to ▁develop ▁an ▁en rich ed , ▁fort ified ▁anth rop oc ent ric ▁notion ▁of ▁human ▁interest ▁to ▁replace ▁the ▁dominant ▁short - term , ▁section al ▁and ▁self - reg arding ▁conception ." ▁In ▁turn , ▁Pl um wood ▁in ▁Environment al ▁Culture : ▁The ▁E colog ical ▁Cris is ▁of ▁Re ason ▁argued ▁that ▁Grey ' s ▁anth rop oc entr ism ▁is ▁in ade qu ate . ▁ ▁It ▁is ▁important ▁to ▁take ▁note ▁that ▁many ▁devoted ▁environmental ists ▁en comp ass ▁a ▁somewhat ▁anth rop oc ent ric - based ▁philosoph ical ▁view ▁supporting ▁the ▁fact ▁that ▁they ▁will ▁argue ▁in ▁favor ▁of ▁saving ▁the ▁environment ▁for ▁the ▁sake ▁of ▁human ▁populations . ▁Grey ▁writes : ▁" We ▁should ▁be ▁concerned ▁to ▁promote ▁a ▁rich , ▁diverse , ▁and ▁v ibr ant ▁b ios phere . ▁Human ▁fl our ishing ▁may ▁certainly ▁be ▁included ▁as ▁a ▁legit imate ▁part ▁of ▁such ▁a ▁fl our ishing ." ▁Such ▁a ▁concern ▁for ▁human ▁fl