. ▁Despite ▁calls ▁for ▁inter ference , ▁the ▁goal ▁was ▁allowed . ▁St av anger ▁respond ed ▁by ▁winning ▁ 4 – 3 ▁at ▁home ▁in ▁game ▁ 2 , ▁before ▁being ▁sound ly ▁be aten ▁ 0 – 5 ▁in ▁game ▁ 3 . ▁ ▁The ▁fourth ▁game ▁was ▁the ▁most ▁closely ▁cont ested ▁in ▁the ▁series , ▁being ▁tied ▁at ▁ 1 – 1 ▁in ▁reg ulation ▁and ▁won ▁by ▁the ▁O ilers ▁in ▁double ▁over time . ▁Near ly ▁half way ▁into ▁the ▁first ▁period ▁of ▁over time , ▁a ▁break away ▁goal ▁by ▁St av anger ' s ▁Ju ha ▁Ka un ism ä ki ▁was ▁controvers ial ly ▁dis allowed ▁because ▁none ▁of ▁the ▁officials , ▁including ▁the ▁goal ▁judge , ▁saw ▁the ▁pu ck ▁go ▁in . ▁Foot age ▁provided ▁by ▁the ▁broad c aster ▁TV ▁ 2 ▁showed ▁the ▁pu ck ▁def lect ing ▁off ▁the ▁right ▁post , ▁the ▁net ▁inside ▁the ▁goal ▁and ▁finally ▁the ▁left ▁post ▁before ▁being ▁blocked ▁by ▁the ▁go alt ender . ▁Since ▁video ▁ref ere eing ▁is ▁not ▁allowed ▁in ▁Norwegian ▁ice ▁hockey , ▁the ▁foot age ▁could ▁not ▁be ▁used ▁and ▁the ▁game ▁continued ▁until ▁S nor re ▁Hal lem ▁scored ▁ 4 ▁minutes ▁and ▁ 3 8 ▁seconds ▁into ▁the ▁second ▁over time ▁period ▁to ▁tie ▁the ▁series ▁at ▁ 2 – 2 . ▁Following ▁this ▁incident , ▁the ▁N I H F ▁decided ▁to ▁allow ▁limited ▁use ▁of ▁video ▁re plays ▁for ▁the ▁remainder ▁of ▁the