df 6 ▁ 2 2 . B b 1 ▁h 5 ▁ 2 3 . h 3 ▁h 4 + ▁ 2 4 . N x h 4 ▁Ne 5 ▁ 2 5 . N f 3 ▁N h 5 + ▁ 2 6 . K f 2 ▁N xf 3 ▁ 2 7 . K xf 3 ▁e 5 ▁ 2 8 . R c 1 ▁N f 4 ▁ 2 9 . R a 2 ▁N d 3 ▁ 3 0 . R c 3 ▁N f 4 ▁ 3 1 . B c 2 ▁Ne 6 ▁ 3 2 . K g 3 ▁R d 4 ▁ ½ – ½ ▁ ▁Game ▁ 3 , ▁K ram nik – An and , ▁ 0 – 1 ▁ ▁In ▁game ▁ 3 , ▁An and ▁chose ▁a ▁raz or - sharp ▁variation ▁of ▁the ▁Mer an ▁Vari ation ▁of ▁the ▁Sem i - S lav ▁Def ence ; ▁following ▁a ▁little - play ed ▁line ▁( 1 4 ... B b 7 ) ▁and ▁played ▁a ▁new ▁idea ▁( 1 7 . ▁... ▁R g 4 ) ▁which ▁led ▁to ▁the ▁sacrifice ▁of ▁two ▁pa wn s . ▁( An and ▁later ▁said ▁that ▁this ▁was ▁largely ▁prepared ▁by ▁his ▁second ▁R ust am ▁Kas im dz han ov .) ▁An and ▁achieved ▁a ▁v icious ▁attack ▁and ▁despite ▁simplified ▁material , ▁K ram nik ▁was ▁unable ▁to ▁defend ▁successfully . ▁G M ▁Vladimir ▁Dim it rov ▁wrote , ▁" V