▁persons ▁with ▁dis abilities ▁do ▁not ▁obtain ▁direct ▁financial ▁benefits ▁from ▁su ing ▁business es ▁that ▁viol ate ▁the ▁A DA . ▁ ▁The ▁att or ne ys ' ▁fe es ▁provision ▁of ▁Title ▁III ▁does ▁provide ▁in cent ive ▁for ▁law y ers ▁to ▁special ize ▁and ▁eng age ▁in ▁serial ▁A DA ▁lit ig ation , ▁but ▁a ▁disabled ▁pla int iff ▁does ▁not ▁obtain ▁financial ▁reward ▁from ▁att or ne ys ' ▁fe es ▁unless ▁they ▁act ▁as ▁their ▁own ▁att orney , ▁or ▁as ▁mentioned ▁above , ▁a ▁disabled ▁pla int iff ▁res ides ▁in ▁a ▁state ▁that ▁provides ▁for ▁minimum ▁compens ation ▁and ▁court ▁fe es ▁in ▁law su its . ▁Moreover , ▁there ▁may ▁be ▁a ▁benefit ▁to ▁these ▁" private ▁att or ne ys ▁general " ▁who ▁identify ▁and ▁comp el ▁the ▁correction ▁of ▁illegal ▁conditions : ▁they ▁may ▁increase ▁the ▁number ▁of ▁public ▁accommod ations ▁accessible ▁to ▁persons ▁with ▁dis abilities . ▁" C ivil ▁rights ▁law ▁depends ▁heavily ▁on ▁private ▁enfor cement . ▁Moreover , ▁the ▁inclusion ▁of ▁pen alt ies ▁and ▁dam ages ▁is ▁the ▁driving ▁force ▁that ▁facil it ates ▁volunt ary ▁comp liance ▁with ▁the ▁A DA ." ▁Cour ts ▁have ▁noted : ▁ ▁As ▁a ▁result , ▁most ▁A DA ▁su its ▁are ▁brought ▁by ▁a ▁small ▁number ▁of ▁private ▁pla int iffs ▁who ▁view ▁themselves ▁as ▁champions ▁of ▁the ▁disabled . ▁For ▁the ▁A DA ▁to ▁yield ▁its ▁promise ▁of ▁equal ▁access ▁for ▁the ▁disabled , ▁it ▁may ▁indeed