ca ult ▁critic ised ▁Der r ida ' s ▁interpretation ▁of ▁René ▁Des cart es . ▁The ▁two ▁remained ▁bitter ▁riv als ▁until ▁recon cil ing ▁in ▁ 1 9 8 1 . ▁In ▁the ▁English - spe aking ▁world , ▁the ▁work ▁became ▁a ▁significant ▁influence ▁on ▁the ▁anti - ps ych iat ry ▁movement ▁during ▁the ▁ 1 9 6 0 s ; ▁Fou ca ult ▁took ▁a ▁mixed ▁approach ▁to ▁this , ▁associ ating ▁with ▁a ▁number ▁of ▁anti - ps ych iat rist s ▁but ▁arg uing ▁that ▁most ▁of ▁them ▁misunder stood ▁his ▁work . ▁ ▁Fou ca ult ' s ▁secondary ▁th esis ▁( ), ▁written ▁in ▁Hamburg ▁between ▁ 1 9 5 9 ▁and ▁ 1 9 6 0 , ▁was ▁a ▁translation ▁and ▁comment ary ▁on ▁German ▁phil os opher ▁Im manuel ▁Kant ' s ▁Anth rop ology ▁from ▁a ▁Prag m atic ▁Point ▁of ▁View ▁( 1 7 9 8 ); ▁the ▁th esis ▁would ▁be ▁titled ▁" Introduction ▁à ▁l An th rop ologie ." ▁L arg ely ▁consisting ▁of ▁Fou ca ult ' s ▁discussion ▁of ▁text ual ▁d ating — an ▁" arch ae ology ▁of ▁the ▁Kant ian ▁text " — he ▁rounded ▁off ▁the ▁th esis ▁with ▁an ▁ev ocation ▁of ▁N iet z sche , ▁his ▁biggest ▁philosoph ical ▁influence . ▁This ▁work ' s ▁rapp orte ur ▁was ▁Fou ca ult ' s ▁old ▁t utor ▁and ▁then - direct or ▁of ▁the ▁E NS , ▁Hy