> ▁ ▁V irt ually ▁all ▁the ▁deep ▁personal ▁significance ▁which ▁Fre ud ▁in ▁his ▁analysis ▁attributed ▁to ▁his ▁Ir ma ▁dream ▁would ▁be ▁lost ▁without ▁the ▁ver bal ▁dialog ue . ▁Yet ▁the ▁utter ances ▁are ▁fully ▁gram mat ical ; ▁they ▁contain ▁properly ▁embedded ▁and ▁con jo ined ▁cla uses , ▁two ▁conditional ▁phr ases , ▁a ▁future ▁t ense , ▁and ▁two ▁instances ▁of ▁neg ation . ▁All ▁words ▁are ▁proper ▁German ▁( in ▁the ▁original ). ▁Sem ant ically ▁most ▁of ▁the ▁dialog ue ▁appears ▁appropriate ▁to ▁the ▁overall ▁scenario , ▁except ▁the ▁last ▁which ▁is ▁med ically ▁abs urd . ▁ ▁Re play ▁hypothesis ▁Fre ud ▁was ▁apparently ▁confront ed ▁with ▁the ▁en igma ▁of ▁how ▁the ▁generation ▁of ▁speech , ▁a ▁secondary ▁process ▁par ▁excell ence , ▁could ▁be ▁function ing ▁at ▁such ▁a ▁apparently ▁high ▁level ▁of ▁ade qu acy ▁during ▁dream ing , ▁the ▁input ▁and ▁mot ive ▁power ▁of ▁which ▁involves ▁a ▁theoret ically ▁primary ▁process . ▁Fre ud ▁attempted ▁to ▁resolve ▁this ▁problem ▁by ▁introdu cing ▁his ▁" re play ▁hypothesis " ▁( as ▁He yn ick ▁terms ▁it ), ▁according ▁to ▁which ▁the ▁dialog ue ▁in ▁dream s ▁is ▁merely ▁a ▁repeating , ▁in ▁the ▁same ▁or ▁similar ▁words , ▁of ▁speech ▁actually ▁said ▁or ▁heard ▁by ▁the ▁dream er ▁recently ▁in ▁w aking ▁life , ▁usually ▁on ▁the ▁day ▁before ▁the ▁dream , ▁only ▁slightly ▁modified ▁( if ▁at ▁all ) ▁by ▁the ▁above - ment ioned ▁process ▁of ▁" second