▁his ▁individual ▁actions , ▁and ▁thinks ▁that ▁at ▁every ▁moment ▁he ▁can ▁commence ▁another ▁manner ▁of ▁life . ▁... ▁But ▁a ▁posterior i , ▁through ▁experience , ▁he ▁finds ▁to ▁his ▁aston ishment ▁that ▁he ▁is ▁not ▁free , ▁but ▁subject ed ▁to ▁necessity , ▁that ▁in ▁spite ▁of ▁all ▁his ▁resolution s ▁and ▁ref lections ▁he ▁does ▁not ▁change ▁his ▁conduct , ▁and ▁that ▁from ▁the ▁beginning ▁of ▁his ▁life ▁to ▁the ▁end ▁of ▁it , ▁he ▁must ▁carry ▁out ▁the ▁very ▁character ▁which ▁he ▁himself ▁condem ns ... ▁In ▁his ▁ess ay ▁On ▁the ▁Fre edom ▁of ▁the ▁Will , ▁Sch open h auer ▁stated , ▁" You ▁can ▁do ▁what ▁you ▁will , ▁but ▁in ▁any ▁given ▁moment ▁of ▁your ▁life ▁you ▁can ▁will ▁only ▁one ▁definite ▁thing ▁and ▁absolutely ▁nothing ▁other ▁than ▁that ▁one ▁thing ." ▁According ▁to ▁Sch open h auer , ▁phen omena ▁do ▁not ▁have ▁free ▁will . ▁However , ▁will ▁[ urg ing , ▁cra ving , ▁st riv ing , ▁wanting , ▁and ▁des iring ] ▁as ▁nou men on ▁is ▁free . ▁ ▁Free ▁will ▁as ▁" m oral ▁imagination " ▁Rudolf ▁Ste iner , ▁who ▁collabor ated ▁in ▁a ▁complete ▁edition ▁of ▁Arthur ▁Sch open h auer ' s ▁work , ▁wrote ▁The ▁Philosoph y ▁of ▁Fre edom , ▁which ▁focus es ▁on ▁the ▁problem ▁of ▁free ▁will . ▁Ste iner ▁( 1 8 6 1 – 1 9 2 5 ) ▁initially ▁div ides ▁this ▁into ▁the ▁two ▁aspects ▁of ▁freedom