▁Again st ▁T ort ure ▁and ▁submitted ▁to ▁the ▁European ▁Court ▁of ▁Human ▁Rights ▁on ▁November ▁ 1 6 , ▁ 2 0 0 1 .. ▁ ▁The ▁applic ant ▁alleg ed ▁that ▁while ▁in ▁det ention ▁on ▁rem and ▁he ▁had ▁been ▁tort ured ▁by ▁police ▁officers ▁in ▁order ▁to ▁extract ▁a ▁conf ession ▁to ▁the ▁ra pe ▁and ▁murder ▁of ▁a ▁female ▁minor . ▁As ▁a ▁result , ▁he ▁had ▁jump ed ▁out ▁of ▁the ▁window ▁of ▁the ▁police ▁station ▁and ▁broken ▁his ▁sp ine . ▁He ▁also ▁compla ined ▁that ▁the ▁investigation ▁into ▁these ▁events ▁by ▁the ▁Russian ▁police ▁had ▁been ▁in effect ive . ▁▁ ▁The ▁court ' s ▁decision ▁in ▁this ▁case ▁was ▁a ▁judgment ▁on ▁January ▁ 2 6 , ▁ 2 0 0 6 . ▁The ▁E CH R ▁recognized ▁that ▁there ▁was ▁ill - tre at ment ▁of ▁Mik he ye v , ▁which ▁is ▁a ▁viol ation ▁of ▁Article ▁ 3 ▁of ▁the ▁European ▁Convention ▁on ▁Human ▁Rights ▁and ▁Basic ▁Fre edom . ▁In ▁addition , ▁the ▁court ▁held ▁that ▁there ▁was ▁a ▁viol ation ▁of ▁Article ▁ 3 ▁of ▁the ▁Convention ▁on ▁account ▁of ▁the ▁lack ▁of ▁effective ▁rem ed ies ▁in ▁respect ▁of ▁the ▁ill - tre at ment ▁that ▁Mik he ye v ▁compla ined ▁about . ▁E CH R ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁State ▁should ▁pay ▁Mik he ye v ▁ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 ▁eu ros ▁in ▁total ▁compens ation . ▁ ▁Case ▁▁ ▁Mik he ye