▁that ▁it ▁was ▁designed ▁by ▁Ener gia ▁Cor p ▁in ▁ 1 9 9 9 - 2 0 0 0 ▁and ▁was ▁selected ▁against ▁a ▁proposal ▁from ▁O ko ▁manufact urer ▁N PO ▁Lav och kin . ▁The ▁Russian ▁Ministry ▁of ▁Def ence ▁awarded ▁the ▁contract ▁to ▁Ener gia ▁in ▁ 2 0 0 7 ▁with ▁an ▁expected ▁delivery ▁date ▁of ▁ 2 0 0 8 , ▁for ▁a ▁test ▁launch ▁in ▁ 2 0 0 9 . ▁In ▁ 2 0 0 9 ▁it ▁was ▁reported ▁to ▁be ▁delayed ▁until ▁late ▁ 2 0 1 1 / ear ly ▁ 2 0 1 2 . ▁In ▁ 2 0 1 1 ▁the ▁Russian ▁Mo D ▁su ed ▁Ener gia ▁for ▁the ▁delay , ▁claim ing ▁that ▁a ▁contract ▁extension ▁issued ▁until ▁May ▁ 2 0 1 0 ▁was ▁invalid ▁and ▁asking ▁for ▁ 2 6 2 ▁million ▁rub les ▁in ▁compens ation . ▁According ▁to ▁news ▁reports ▁Ener gia ▁said ▁that ▁the ▁contract ▁extension ▁was ▁valid ▁and ▁that ▁the ▁problem ▁was ▁with ▁their ▁sub cont ract ors . ▁In ▁addition ▁they ▁said ▁that ▁the ▁Russian ▁Mo D ▁kept ▁changing ▁the ▁specification ▁and ▁demand ing ▁things ▁that ▁were ▁beyond ▁the ▁capabilities ▁of ▁the ▁industry . ▁The ▁Russian ▁Mo D ▁lost ▁the ▁court ▁case . ▁Ener gia ▁delivered ▁a ▁satellite ▁in ▁ 2 0 0 9 ▁but ▁as ▁of ▁April ▁ 2 0 1 2 ▁there ▁had ▁not ▁been ▁a ▁test ▁launch . ▁ ▁In ▁April ▁ 2 0 1 2 ▁minister ▁Alexander ▁Su