▁the ▁Heb rew ▁T etra gram mat on ▁as ▁The ▁E ternal ▁rather ▁than ▁a ▁common ▁title ▁such ▁as ▁The ▁L ORD ▁or ▁a ▁transl iter ation ▁such ▁as ▁Y ah we h ▁or ▁Je hov ah ▁( though ▁such ▁a ▁translation ▁rendering ▁is ▁not ▁unique ▁to ▁The ▁Vo ice ; ▁there ▁are ▁other ▁Bible ▁transl ations ▁such ▁as ▁the ▁M off att , ▁New ▁Trans lation ▁of ▁ 1 9 2 2 ▁that ▁have ▁rendered ▁the ▁T etra gram mat on ▁in ▁this ▁manner ). ▁Another ▁distinction ▁is ▁rendering ▁a ▁title ▁such ▁as ▁The ▁Word ▁( e . g ., ▁John , ▁Chapter ▁ 1 ) ▁as ▁The ▁Vo ice ▁rather ▁than ▁as ▁The ▁Word ▁which ▁is ▁used ▁in ▁most ▁Bible ▁transl ations ▁or ▁the ▁less ▁than ▁common ▁expression ▁Log os ▁as ▁used ▁in ▁such ▁transl ations ▁as ▁the ▁Em ph atic ▁Di ag l ott ▁( a ▁Greek - English ▁Inter linear , ▁first ▁published ▁in ▁ 1 8 6 4 ▁by ▁Benjamin ▁Wilson ) ▁and ▁the ▁M off att , ▁New ▁Trans lation ▁of ▁ 1 9 2 2 , ▁or ▁the ▁use ▁of ▁the ▁An oint ed ▁One ▁( e . g . ▁Matthew ▁ 1 : 1 ) ▁instead ▁of ▁Christ . ▁ ▁Crit ic ism ▁ ▁The ▁Vo ice ▁has ▁been ▁har sh ly ▁received ▁by ▁some ▁fundamental ist ▁critics . ▁For ▁instance , ▁Bapt ist ▁past or ▁R andy ▁White ▁writes : ▁" The ▁Vo ice ▁reads ▁like ▁a ▁New ▁Age ▁book . ▁The ▁familiar ▁'