▁this ▁distinction ▁origin ated ▁there . ▁But ▁G illet te ▁quoted ▁the ▁passage ▁Hol mes ▁had ▁c ited , ▁in ▁which ▁Black stone ▁discussed ▁what ▁constit uted ▁burg l ary ▁under ▁common ▁law , ▁to ▁cast ▁doubt ▁on ▁Hol mes ' ▁interpretation , ▁not ing ▁that ▁Black stone ▁had ▁included ▁all ▁the ▁possible ▁out build ings ▁as ▁places ▁where ▁un law ful ▁entry ▁and ▁the ft ▁could ▁be ▁pun ished ▁as ▁burg l ary . ▁Black stone ' s ▁chapter ▁on ▁tres pass ▁like wise ▁specifically ▁mentioned ▁a ▁man ' s ▁land ▁as ▁leg ally ▁protected . ▁" Rel iance ▁on ▁the ▁common - law ▁concept ▁of ▁cur til age ▁to ▁justify ▁ex cluding ▁land ▁outside ▁the ▁cur til age ▁from ▁the ▁prote ctions ▁of ▁either ▁constitution al ▁provision ▁is ▁mis pla ced ", ▁G illet te ▁concluded ." ▁ ▁Last ly ▁G illet te ▁rejected ▁the ▁state ' s ▁argument ▁that ▁whether ▁land ▁outside ▁cur til age ▁was ▁covered ▁by ▁its ▁owner ' s ▁priv acy ▁interest ▁dep ended ▁on ▁how ▁that ▁land ▁was ▁used . ▁It ▁dep ended , ▁he ▁wrote , ▁on ▁whether ▁the ▁owner ▁had ▁taken ▁steps ▁to ▁exclude ▁intr ud ers , ▁such ▁as ▁putting ▁up ▁f ences ▁or ▁posting ▁the ▁bounds . ▁" Allow ing ▁the ▁police ▁to ▁intr ude ▁into ▁private ▁land , ▁regardless ▁of ▁the ▁steps ▁taken ▁by ▁its ▁occup ant ▁to ▁keep ▁it ▁private , ▁would ▁be ▁a ▁significant ▁limitation ▁on ▁the ▁occup ant ' s ▁freedom ▁from ▁government al ▁scr ut iny ."