9 5 9 , ▁free ▁will ▁belief ▁in ▁individuals ▁has ▁been ▁anal ys ed ▁with ▁respect ▁to ▁tra its ▁in ▁social ▁behaviour . ▁In ▁general , ▁the ▁concept ▁of ▁free ▁will ▁research ed ▁to ▁date ▁in ▁this ▁context ▁has ▁been ▁that ▁of ▁the ▁in compat ibil ist , ▁or ▁more ▁specifically , ▁the ▁libert arian , ▁that ▁is ▁freedom ▁from ▁determin ism . ▁ ▁What ▁people ▁believe ▁Whether ▁people ▁naturally ▁ad here ▁to ▁an ▁in compat ibil ist ▁model ▁of ▁free ▁will ▁has ▁been ▁question ed ▁in ▁the ▁research . ▁Edd y ▁N ah mi as ▁has ▁found ▁that ▁in compat ibil ism ▁is ▁not ▁intuit ive   – ▁it ▁was ▁not ▁ad her ed ▁to , ▁in ▁that ▁determin ism ▁does ▁not ▁neg ate ▁belief ▁in ▁moral ▁responsibility ▁( based ▁on ▁an ▁empir ical ▁study ▁of ▁people ' s ▁responses ▁to ▁moral ▁d ile mm as ▁under ▁a ▁determin istic ▁model ▁of ▁reality ). ▁Edward ▁C ok ely ▁has ▁found ▁that ▁in compat ibil ism ▁is ▁intuit ive   – ▁it ▁was ▁naturally ▁ad her ed ▁to , ▁in ▁that ▁determin ism ▁does ▁indeed ▁neg ate ▁belief ▁in ▁moral ▁responsibility ▁in ▁general . ▁Josh ua ▁Kn obe ▁and ▁Sh a un ▁Nich ols ▁have ▁proposed ▁that ▁in compat ibil ism ▁may ▁or ▁may ▁not ▁be ▁intuit ive , ▁and ▁that ▁it ▁is ▁dependent ▁to ▁some ▁large ▁degree ▁upon ▁the ▁circumstances ; ▁whether ▁or ▁not ▁the ▁crime ▁inc ites ▁an ▁emot ional ▁response   – ▁for ▁example ▁if ▁it ▁involves ▁harm ing ▁another