. Q b 5 ▁b 6 ▁ 2 0 . R fd 1 ▁R d 6 ▁ 2 1 . R d 4 ▁a 6 ▁ 2 2 . Q b 4 ▁h 5 ▁ 2 3 . B h 3 ▁Rad 8 ▁ 2 4 . g 3 ▁g 5 ▁ 2 5 . Rad 1 ▁g 4 ▁ 2 6 . B g 2 ▁Ne 6 ▁ 2 7 . R 4 d 3 ▁d 4 ▁ 2 8 . ex d 4 ▁R x d 4 ▁ 2 9 . R x d 4 ▁R x d 4 ▁ ½ – ½ ▁ ▁Game ▁ 5 , ▁K ram nik – An and , ▁ 0 – 1 ▁ ▁Re pe ating ▁the ▁same ▁sharp ▁line ▁which ▁brought ▁victory ▁in ▁game ▁ 3 , ▁An and ▁sid este pped ▁whatever ▁ant id ote ▁K ram nik ▁had ▁prepared ▁by ▁interpol ating ▁ 1 5 ... R g 8 ▁before ▁Bd 6 . ▁If ▁K ram nik ▁had ▁continued ▁ 1 6 . R d 1 , ▁An and ▁could ▁have ▁trans posed ▁to ▁the ▁previous ▁game ▁by ▁ 1 6 ... B d 6 ▁or ▁played ▁any ▁of ▁the ▁alternatives , ▁such ▁as ▁ 1 6 ... R a 5 . ▁As ▁played ▁( 1 6 . B f 4 ) ▁the ▁game ▁developed ▁with ▁equal ▁ch ances ▁for ▁both ▁sides . ▁By ▁move ▁ 2 8 ▁An and ▁was ▁slightly ▁better , ▁and ▁K ram nik ▁bl under ed