, ▁titled ▁" Inter course : ▁An ▁Institution ▁of ▁Male ▁Power ," ▁author ▁C ind y ▁Jen ef sky ▁states : ▁" As ▁in ▁her ▁analysis ▁of ▁por n ography ' s ▁sexual ▁sub ord ination , ▁the ▁key ▁to ▁understanding ▁D work in ' s ▁analysis ▁of ▁sexual ▁inter course ▁rest s ▁on ▁recogn izing ▁how ▁she ▁integr ates ▁the ▁individual ▁act ▁of ▁sexual ▁inter course ▁within ▁its ▁larger ▁social ▁context . ▁She ▁produces ▁a ▁material ist ▁analysis ▁that ▁exam ines ▁sexual ▁inter course ▁as ▁an ▁institution al ized ▁practice ." ▁( emph asis ▁hers ) ▁ ▁Cont ro vers y ▁ ▁Such ▁descri ptions ▁are ▁often ▁c ited ▁by ▁D work in ' s ▁critics , ▁claim ing ▁that ▁Inter course ▁argued ▁that ▁" All ▁heter osex ual ▁inter course ▁is ▁ra pe ." ▁That ▁statement , ▁however , ▁is ▁not ▁directly ▁made ▁in ▁the ▁book , ▁and ▁her ▁compar isons ▁of ▁inter course ▁to ▁" occupation ," ▁" pos session ," ▁" coll abor ation ," ▁etc . ▁are ▁made ▁in ▁the ▁context ▁of ▁discuss ions ▁of ▁the ▁way ▁in ▁which ▁inter course ▁is ▁dep icted ▁" the ▁disc ourse ▁of ▁male ▁truth -- liter ature , ▁science , ▁philosophy , ▁por n ography ", ▁and ▁the ▁enfor cement ▁of ▁those ▁terms ▁through ▁men ' s ▁social ▁power ▁over ▁women . ▁ ▁D work in ▁rejected ▁the ▁interpretation ▁that ▁" All ▁heter osex ual ▁inter course ▁is ▁ra pe " ▁as ▁a ▁grave ▁misunder standing ▁of ▁her ▁work . ▁She