▁not ▁properly ▁class ified ▁as ▁religious ▁worship , ▁it ▁certainly ▁was ▁religious ▁pros ely t ism , ▁and ▁the ▁school ▁was ▁within ▁its ▁rights ▁to ▁exclude ▁the ▁Club ▁from ▁campus . ▁ ▁Justice ▁S outer ▁was ▁more ▁direct . ▁ ▁It ▁is ▁beyond ▁question ▁that ▁Good ▁News ▁int ends ▁to ▁use ▁the ▁public ▁school ▁prem ises ▁not ▁for ▁the ▁mere ▁discussion ▁of ▁a ▁subject ▁from ▁a ▁particular , ▁Christian ▁point ▁of ▁view , ▁but ▁for ▁an ▁evangel ical ▁service ▁of ▁worship ▁calling ▁children ▁to ▁commit ▁themselves ▁in ▁an ▁act ▁of ▁Christian ▁conversion . ▁ ▁The ▁majority ▁avoid s ▁this ▁reality ▁only ▁by ▁resort ing ▁to ▁the ▁bland ▁and ▁general ▁character ization ▁of ▁Good ▁News ' s ▁activity ▁as ▁' te aching ▁of ▁mor als ▁and ▁character , ▁from ▁a ▁religious ▁stand point '. ▁ ▁If ▁the ▁majority ' s ▁statement ▁ign ores ▁reality , ▁as ▁it ▁surely ▁does , ▁then ▁today ' s ▁holding ▁may ▁be ▁understood ▁only ▁in ▁equally ▁generic ▁terms . ▁ ▁Otherwise , ▁indeed , ▁this ▁case ▁would ▁stand ▁for ▁the ▁remarkable ▁proposition ▁that ▁any ▁public ▁school ▁opened ▁for ▁civ ic ▁meet ings ▁must ▁be ▁opened ▁for ▁use ▁as ▁a ▁church , ▁syn agog ue , ▁or ▁mos que . ▁▁ ▁S outer ▁also ▁disput ed ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁proper ▁for ▁the ▁Court ▁to ▁reach ▁the ▁Est ab lish ment ▁Cla use ▁claim . ▁ ▁Ne ither ▁the ▁district ▁court ▁nor ▁the ▁Second ▁Circ uit ▁had ▁based ▁their ▁r ul ings ▁on ▁the ▁Est ab lish ment ▁Cla use ,