▁en ▁b anc ▁on ▁May ▁ 1 4 , ▁ 2 0 1 3 . ▁But ▁Commission ▁on ▁E lection ▁Chair man ▁Si xt o ▁Br ill antes ▁in ▁his ▁diss ent ing ▁opinion ▁pointed ▁that ▁the ▁evidence ▁presented ▁by ▁Vel as co ' s ▁camp ▁is ▁a ▁double ▁he ars ay ▁and ▁in ad miss ible ▁since ▁it ▁was ▁never ▁sw orn ▁nor ▁authentic ated ▁by ▁the ▁issu ing ▁officer ▁and ▁it ▁was ▁taken ▁in ▁an ▁internet ▁blog ▁of ▁unknown ▁blog ger . ▁ ▁Despite ▁this , ▁Re yes ▁continued ▁to ▁sit ▁as ▁representative ▁of ▁Mar indu que , ▁with ▁the ▁Re yes ▁camp ▁claim ing ▁that ▁it ▁is ▁the ▁House ▁of ▁Representatives ▁Elect oral ▁Trib unal ▁( H RE T ), ▁and ▁not ▁the ▁Com ele c ▁or ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court , ▁that ▁should ▁have ▁juris diction ▁over ▁the ▁case . ▁On ▁September ▁ 1 1 , ▁ 2 0 1 4 , ▁Gab ri ela ▁Represent ative ▁Lu z vim inda ▁Il agan ▁said ▁that ▁the ▁House ▁of ▁Representatives ▁Elect oral ▁Trib unal ▁voting ▁ 4 - 3 ▁finally ▁decided ▁that ▁they ▁( H RE T ▁members ) ▁will ▁u ph old ▁the ▁exclus ivity ▁of ▁juris diction ▁over ▁any ▁protest ▁or ▁contest ▁in ▁the ▁result ▁of ▁election ▁of ▁any ▁House ▁of ▁Representatives ▁members . ▁With ▁this ▁development , ▁the ▁Commission ' s ▁and ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ' s ▁respective ▁dec isions ▁will ▁be ▁no ▁longer ▁in ▁effect . ▁Thus , ▁Represent ative ▁Regin a ▁O ng s ia ko