ative ▁process ▁in ▁Isra eli ▁does ▁not ▁recognize ▁a ▁ground ▁of ▁lack ▁of ▁“ leg isl ative ▁due ▁process ”, ▁the ▁Court ▁would ▁interven e ▁if ▁there ▁is ▁a ▁defect ▁in ▁the ▁legisl ative ▁process ▁that ▁“ go es ▁to ▁the ▁heart ▁of ▁the ▁process .” ▁Such ▁a ▁defect ▁is ▁one ▁that ▁involves ▁a ▁severe ▁and ▁substantial ▁viol ation ▁of ▁the ▁basic ▁principles ▁of ▁the ▁legisl ative ▁process ▁in ▁Israel ' s ▁parliament ary ▁and ▁constitution al ▁system . ▁ ▁In ▁a ▁ 2 0 0 6 ▁case ▁concerning ▁a ▁d eta ine e ' s ▁right ▁to ▁legal ▁coun sel , ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁acqu itted ▁a ▁soldier ▁conv icted ▁of ▁using ▁dru gs ▁on ▁the ▁basis ▁of ▁his ▁own ▁conf ession , ▁because ▁the ▁military ▁polic eman ▁who ▁inter rog ated ▁him ▁did ▁not ▁inform ▁him ▁of ▁his ▁right ▁to ▁consult ▁with ▁an ▁att orney . ▁ ▁In ▁this ▁decision , ▁Be in isch ▁ruled ▁that ▁in ▁view ▁of ▁the ▁norm ative ▁change ▁in ▁the ▁Isra eli ▁legal ▁system ▁introduced ▁by ▁the ▁Basic ▁Law : ▁Human ▁D ign ity ▁and ▁Liber ty , ▁and ▁in ▁the ▁absence ▁of ▁legisl ation ▁on ▁this ▁issue , ▁the ▁time ▁has ▁come ▁to ▁adopt ▁a ▁case ▁law ▁doctrine ▁of ▁in ad miss ibility ▁for ▁il leg ally ▁obtained ▁evidence . ▁She ▁also ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁appropriate ▁doctrine ▁for ▁the ▁Isra eli ▁legal ▁system ▁to ▁adopt ▁is ▁not ▁an ▁absolute ▁one , ▁but ▁a ▁relative ▁doctrine ▁which ▁allows ▁the ▁court ▁to ▁exclude ▁il leg ally ▁obtained