▁holding ▁of ▁interests ▁in ▁land — ru led ▁out ▁the ▁possibility ▁of ▁any ▁given ▁individual ▁holding ▁land ▁in ▁two ▁different ▁kingdom s . ▁Robert ▁Cal vin , ▁born ▁in ▁Scotland ▁around ▁ 1 6 0 6 , ▁inherited ▁est ates ▁in ▁England , ▁but ▁his ▁rights ▁ther eto ▁were ▁challeng ed ▁on ▁the ▁grounds ▁that , ▁as ▁a ▁Scot , ▁he ▁could ▁not ▁leg ally ▁own ▁English ▁land . ▁▁ ▁As ▁it ▁happened , ▁the ▁child ▁" Ro bert ▁Cal vin " ▁was ▁actually ▁named ▁James ▁Col ville ; ▁he ▁was ▁the ▁son ▁of ▁Robert ▁Col ville , ▁Master ▁of ▁C ul ross , ▁and ▁grand son ▁of ▁the ▁court ier ▁James ▁Col ville , ▁ 1 st ▁Lord ▁Col ville ▁of ▁C ul ross . ▁ ▁Jud gment ▁The ▁Court ▁of ▁King ' s ▁Ben ch ▁ruled ▁in ▁Cal vin ' s ▁favour , ▁finding ▁that ▁he ▁was ▁not ▁an ▁al ien ▁and ▁did ▁have ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁hold ▁land ▁in ▁England . ▁ ▁Although ▁not ▁directly ▁relevant ▁to ▁the ▁case , ▁Edward ▁Co ke ▁used ▁the ▁occasion ▁to ▁discuss ▁the ▁position ▁of ▁" Per pet ual ▁enemies ", ▁specifying ▁ ▁" All ▁Inf id els ▁are ▁in ▁Law ▁perpet ui ▁in im ici ▁( per pet ual ▁enemies )" ▁( 1 6 6 ). ▁Having ▁accepted ▁that ▁a ▁King ▁who ▁conqu ers ▁a ▁Christian ▁Kingdom ▁is ▁const rained ▁by ▁the ▁continu ance ▁of ▁such ▁laws ▁as ▁exist ▁until ▁new ▁laws ▁are ▁put ▁in ▁place , ▁he ▁continues , ▁however ▁" if