▁test ator ▁was ▁told ▁the ▁will ▁he ▁signed ▁was ▁something ▁other ▁than ▁a ▁will ), ▁and ▁fra ud ▁in ▁the ▁indu cement ▁( for ▁example , ▁the ▁test ator ▁is ▁intention ally ▁mis led ▁by ▁a ▁material ▁fact ▁that ▁caused ▁the ▁test ator ▁to ▁make ▁a ▁different ▁dev ise ▁from ▁the ▁one ▁he ▁would ▁otherwise ▁have ▁made ). ▁ ▁Techn ical ▁fla ws ▁A ▁will ▁contest ▁may ▁be ▁based ▁upon ▁alleg ed ▁failure ▁to ▁ad here ▁to ▁the ▁legal ▁formal ities ▁required ▁in ▁a ▁particular ▁juris diction . ▁For ▁example , ▁some ▁states ▁require ▁that ▁will s ▁must ▁use ▁specific ▁termin ology ▁or ▁j arg on , ▁must ▁be ▁not ar ized , ▁must ▁be ▁witness ed ▁by ▁a ▁certain ▁number ▁of ▁persons , ▁or ▁witness ed ▁by ▁dis inter ested ▁parties ▁who ▁are ▁not ▁relatives , ▁inherit ▁nothing ▁in ▁the ▁will , ▁and ▁are ▁not ▁nominated ▁as ▁an ▁exec utor . ▁Additionally , ▁the ▁test ator ▁and ▁witness es ▁must ▁generally ▁sign ▁the ▁will ▁in ▁each ▁other ' s ▁sight ▁and ▁physical ▁presence . ▁ ▁For ▁example , ▁in ▁Ut ah , ▁a ▁will ▁must ▁be ▁" signed ▁by ▁the ▁test ator ▁or ▁in ▁the ▁test ator ' s ▁name ▁by ▁some ▁other ▁individual ▁in ▁the ▁test ator ' s ▁conscious ▁presence ▁and ▁by ▁the ▁test ator ' s ▁direction ; ▁and ... ▁signed ▁by ▁at ▁least ▁two ▁individuals , ▁each ▁of ▁whom ▁signed ▁within ▁a ▁reasonable ▁time ▁after ▁he ▁witness ed ▁either ▁the ▁signing ▁of ▁the ▁will ... ▁or ▁[ rece