less ▁of ▁whether ▁or ▁not ▁the ▁dream ▁happens ▁to ▁include ▁ver bal ▁dialog ue ) ▁as ▁involving ▁" sch ematic ▁selection " ▁and ▁" element ▁activation ," ▁analog ous ▁to ▁the ▁s ynt actic ▁frame ▁( sent ence ▁structure ) ▁selection ▁and ▁word ▁selection ▁of ▁psych ol ingu istic ▁models . ▁( The ▁dream - like ▁features ▁of ▁dream s , ▁such ▁as ▁cond ens ations ▁( compos ite ▁images ) ▁and ▁anom alous ▁narr ative ▁sh ifts , ▁are ▁seen ▁as ▁resid ual ▁flux ▁of ▁the ▁dream ▁production ▁mechanism , ▁which ▁is ▁otherwise ▁doing ▁a ▁reason ably ▁good ▁job ▁of ▁developing ▁the ▁initial ▁input ▁into ▁a ▁coh er ent ▁narr ative .) ▁Under ▁this ▁theoretical ▁assumption ▁that ▁the ▁human ▁dream - gener ation ▁ability ▁and ▁speech - gener ation ▁ability ▁( in ▁w ake ful ness ) ▁derive ▁from ▁similar ▁cogn itive ▁capac ities , ▁the ▁psych one ir ics ▁model ▁can ▁claim ▁to ▁se am lessly ▁account ▁for ▁the ▁generation ▁of ▁ver bal ▁dialog ue ▁within ▁dream s . ▁ ▁Imp lications ▁for ▁psych ol ingu istics ▁and ▁language ▁psych ology ▁The ▁data ▁presented ▁in ▁the ▁above ▁experiments ▁is ▁considered ▁as ▁having ▁imp lications ▁not ▁just ▁for ▁the ▁evaluation ▁of ▁the ▁various ▁existing ▁models ▁of ▁dream ▁generation , ▁but ▁also ▁for ▁models ▁of ▁speech ▁generation ▁in ▁general , ▁that ▁is ▁in ▁every day ▁life . ▁ ▁Dream ing ▁is ▁a ▁state ▁of ▁conscious ness ▁different ▁from ▁the ▁normal ▁w ake ful ▁state . ▁With ▁regard ▁to ▁actions ▁within ▁the ▁dream ,