▁explained , ▁if ▁it ▁was ▁interpreted ▁as ▁" A ula ▁Reg alis " ▁or ▁" Ro yal ▁Palace ". ▁ ▁The ▁biggest ▁problem ▁with ▁this ▁identification ▁is ▁that ▁the ▁po ems ▁as cribed ▁by ▁Neil son ▁to ▁H uch oun ▁/ ▁Hugh ▁of ▁Eg ling ton ▁are ▁of ▁varying ▁dialect s , ▁none ▁of ▁them ▁Scottish . ▁Even ▁the ▁poem ▁most ▁likely ▁to ▁be ▁auth ent ically ▁H uch oun ' s ▁own ▁work , ▁the ▁P ist el ▁of ▁Sw ete ▁Susan , ▁seems ▁to ▁be ▁in ▁a ▁north ▁York shire ▁dialect ▁overlay ing ▁a ▁Mid land ▁source . ▁G aw ain ▁and ▁the ▁Green ▁Knight ▁and ▁the ▁other ▁three ▁po ems ▁in ▁the ▁Cot ton ▁N ero ▁A . x ▁manuscript ▁have ▁a ▁clearly ▁north - western ▁proven ance , ▁while ▁the ▁All iter ative ▁Mor te ▁Ar th ure ▁is ▁considered ▁to ▁origin ate ▁in ▁the ▁East ▁Mid lands . ▁Two ▁possibilities ▁suggested ▁by ▁Neil son ▁are ▁that ▁a ▁Scottish ▁poet ▁wrote ▁in ▁a ▁southern ▁dialect , ▁perhaps ▁after ▁being ▁educated ▁in ▁England , ▁or ▁that ▁the ▁Scott ic isms ▁were ▁" trans l ated " ▁by ▁later ▁scri bes . ▁It ▁seems ▁a ▁more ▁likely ▁suggestion ▁either ▁that ▁Andrew ▁of ▁W ynt oun ' s ▁poet , ▁H uch oun , ▁was ▁not ▁Scottish ▁( and ▁therefore ▁not ▁Sir ▁Hugh ), ▁or ▁that ▁the ▁po ems ▁he ▁mentions ▁were ▁in ▁fact ▁other ▁works ▁now ▁lost , ▁rather ▁than ▁the ▁great ▁all iter ative ▁po ems ▁Neil son ▁claimed ▁they