ation ▁of ▁V ed anta ▁as ▁the ▁ess ence ▁of ▁H indu ism , ▁and ▁Adv ait a ▁V ed anta ▁as ▁the ▁" par ad ig m atic ▁example ▁of ▁the ▁myst ical ▁nature ▁of ▁the ▁H indu ▁religion " ▁by ▁colonial ▁Ind olog ists ▁but ▁also ▁ne o - V ed ant ins ▁served ▁well ▁for ▁the ▁H indu ▁national ists , ▁who ▁further ▁popular ised ▁this ▁notion ▁of ▁Adv ait a ▁V ed anta ▁as ▁the ▁p inn acle ▁of ▁Indian ▁relig ions . ▁It ▁ ▁This ▁" o pport unity " ▁has ▁been ▁critic ised . ▁According ▁to ▁Such eta ▁Maz um dar ▁and ▁V asant ▁K ai war , ▁ ▁R ine hart ▁also ▁critic ises ▁the ▁inclus iv ism ▁of ▁Rad h ak r ish nan ' s ▁approach , ▁since ▁it ▁provides ▁" a ▁the ological ▁scheme ▁for ▁sub sum ing ▁religious ▁difference ▁under ▁the ▁a eg is ▁of ▁V ed antic ▁truth ." ▁According ▁to ▁R ine hart , ▁the ▁consequence ▁of ▁this ▁line ▁of ▁reasoning ▁is ▁commun al ism , ▁the ▁idea ▁that ▁" all ▁people ▁belonging ▁to ▁one ▁religion ▁have ▁common ▁economic , ▁social ▁and ▁political ▁interests ▁and ▁these ▁interests ▁are ▁contrary ▁to ▁the ▁interests ▁of ▁those ▁belonging ▁to ▁another ▁religion ." ▁R ine hart ▁notes ▁that ▁H indu ▁religios ity ▁plays ▁an ▁important ▁role ▁in ▁the ▁national ist ▁movement , ▁and ▁that ▁" the ▁ne o - H indu ▁disc ource ▁is ▁the ▁un int ended ▁consequence ▁of ▁the ▁initial ▁moves ▁made