▁lists . ▁ ▁The ▁lists ▁provide ▁no ▁details ▁about ▁the ▁personal ities ▁or ▁distingu ishing ▁icon ographic ▁forms ▁for ▁these ▁sh akt is . ▁ ▁Ag raw ala ▁con cludes ▁that ▁all ▁of ▁the ▁lists ▁were ▁derived ▁from ▁one ▁original ▁set ▁of ▁names . ▁ ▁The ▁earliest ▁of ▁the ▁lists ▁appears ▁in ▁the ▁ ▁( I . 6 6 . 1 2 4 - 3 8 ), ▁and ▁appears ▁to ▁have ▁been ▁used ▁with ▁minor ▁variations ▁in ▁the ▁. ▁ ▁These ▁lists ▁are ▁of ▁two ▁types . ▁In ▁the ▁first ▁type ▁the ▁names ▁of ▁various ▁forms ▁of ▁G anes ha ▁are ▁given ▁with ▁a ▁clear - cut ▁pair ing ▁of ▁a ▁named ▁sh ak ti ▁for ▁that ▁form . ▁The ▁second ▁type , ▁as ▁found ▁in ▁the ▁ ▁( II . IV . 4 4 . 6 3 – 7 6 ) ▁and ▁the ▁comment ary ▁of ▁ ▁on ▁the ▁Ś ā rad ā til aka ▁( I . 1 1 5 ), ▁gives ▁fifty ▁or ▁more ▁names ▁of ▁G anes ha ▁collect ively ▁in ▁one ▁group , ▁with ▁the ▁names ▁of ▁the ▁sh akt is ▁provided ▁collect ively ▁in ▁a ▁second ▁group . ▁The ▁second ▁type ▁of ▁list ▁pos es ▁problems ▁in ▁separ ating ▁and ▁properly ▁connecting ▁the ▁names ▁into ▁pairs ▁due ▁to ▁ambigu ities ▁in ▁the ▁formation ▁of ▁S ansk rit ▁comp ound ▁words . ▁ ▁La x mi ▁ ▁Through out ▁India , ▁on ▁contemporary ▁poster ▁art , ▁G anes ha ▁is ▁port rayed ▁with ▁La x mi ▁( god