▁it ▁c ited ▁" public ▁interest " ▁behind ▁its ▁decision . ▁The ▁magazine ▁wrote , ▁" Th ese ▁emails , ▁if ▁genu ine , ▁would ▁indeed ▁raise ▁questions ▁about ▁the ▁working ▁of ▁the ▁court ▁and ▁we ▁are ▁bound ▁to ▁investigate ▁them ▁as ▁fully ▁as ▁we ▁can ." ▁It ▁further ▁wrote ▁about ▁its ▁coverage ▁of ▁the ▁cache ," There ▁is ▁a ▁risk ▁not ▁only ▁of ▁a ▁mis car riage ▁of ▁justice ▁affect ing ▁the ▁individual ▁defend ants , ▁but ▁also ▁that ▁the ▁wrong s ▁which ▁Bang l adesh ▁has ▁already ▁suffered ▁will ▁be ▁ag gra v ated ▁by ▁the ▁fla wed ▁process ▁of ▁the ▁trib unal . ▁That ▁would ▁not ▁he al ▁the ▁country ' s ▁w ounds , ▁but ▁deep en ▁them ." ▁The ▁court ▁called ▁the ▁UK ▁magazine ' s ▁article ▁on ▁the ▁Sk ype ▁conversation ▁" inter ference " ▁and ▁a ▁" vi olation " ▁of ▁priv acy ▁and ▁ordered ▁its ▁represent atives ▁to ▁appear ▁before ▁the ▁court ▁in ▁Bang l adesh ▁to ▁answer ▁for ▁cont empt ▁of ▁court . ▁ ▁The ▁further ▁publication ▁of ▁verb at im ▁quotes ▁from ▁the ▁Sk ype ▁convers ations ▁between ▁N iz am ul ▁Hu q ▁and ▁Ah med ▁Z ia ud din ▁by ▁the ▁Bang l adesh ▁newspaper ▁Am ar ▁Des h ▁revealed ▁government ▁inter vention ▁into ▁the ▁jud ici ary ▁and ▁Bang l adesh ' s ▁International ▁Cr imes ▁Trib unal , ▁which ▁Hu q ▁led . ▁Hu q ▁said ▁in ▁the ▁widely ▁available ▁video ▁( as ▁quoted ▁from ▁Foreign ▁Policy ▁magazine ,