0 0 0 . ▁ ▁A ▁ 2 0 0 4 ▁editor ial ▁column ▁in ▁the ▁Washington ▁Post , ▁noted ▁the ▁Edu c ator ▁Sex ual ▁Mis con duct ▁report ▁was ▁the ▁first ▁analysis ▁of ▁its ▁kind . ▁ ▁She ▁studied ▁nearly ▁ 9 0 0 ▁documents ▁to ▁complete ▁her ▁analyz ed ▁research . ▁C iting ▁the ▁Times ▁Pic ay une , ▁however , ▁the ▁Post ▁also ▁noted ▁that ▁Sh akes haft ' s ▁report ▁had ▁been ▁critic ized ▁by ▁two ▁large ▁teacher ▁organizations , ▁for ▁not ▁separ ating ▁sexual ▁har ass ment ▁of ▁students ▁and ▁actual ▁mol est ation , ▁l ump ing ▁them ▁both ▁together , ▁claim ing ▁that ▁makes ▁the ▁problem ▁seem ▁worse ▁than ▁it ▁is . ▁The ▁editor ▁added , ▁" The ▁fact ▁that ▁this ▁report ▁doesn ' t ▁make ▁those ▁dist in ctions ▁doesn ' t ▁mean ▁it ▁isn ' t ▁valid ; ▁it ▁does ▁mean ▁that ▁more ▁research ▁is ▁needed . ▁In ▁fact , ▁the ▁report ▁itself ▁points ▁out ▁that ▁there ▁has ▁been ▁no ▁nation ally ▁fin anced ▁effort ▁to ▁collect ▁data ▁on ▁sexual ▁mis con duct ▁in ▁schools ." ▁ ▁A ▁ 2 0 0 2 ▁New ▁York ▁Times ▁report ▁quoted ▁Sh akes haft ▁as ▁having ▁written , ▁" Only ▁ 1 ▁percent ▁of ▁the ▁cases ▁did ▁super int end ents ▁follow ▁up ▁to ▁ensure ▁that ▁mol est ing ▁teachers ▁did ▁not ▁continue ▁teaching ▁elsewhere . ▁In ▁ 5 4 ▁percent , ▁super int end ents ▁accepted ▁the ▁teachers ' ▁res ign ations ▁or ▁ret ire