itution al ▁view point ▁disc rim ination . ▁ ▁The ▁club ▁appe aled ▁to ▁the ▁Second ▁Circ uit . ▁ ▁The ▁Second ▁Circ uit ▁aff ir med , ▁holding ▁that ▁the ▁school ' s ▁restriction ▁was ▁not ▁un reason able . ▁ ▁In ▁light ▁of ▁the ▁" qu int ess entially ▁religious " ▁nature ▁of ▁the ▁club ' s ▁activities , ▁the ▁court ▁further ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁school ▁district ▁was ▁eng aging ▁in ▁" const itution al ▁subject ▁disc rim ination " ▁rather ▁than ▁" un const itution al ▁view point ▁disc rim ination " ▁when ▁it ▁ex cluded ▁the ▁club ▁from ▁meeting ▁on ▁its ▁prem ises . ▁ ▁In ▁light ▁of ▁a ▁split ▁among ▁the ▁federal ▁appe als ▁courts ▁regarding ▁whether ▁speech ▁may ▁be ▁ex cluded ▁from ▁a ▁limited ▁public ▁forum ▁by ▁reason ▁of ▁its ▁religious ▁content , ▁the ▁U . S . ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁agreed ▁to ▁review ▁the ▁Second ▁Circ uit ' s ▁r uling ▁in ▁this ▁case . ▁Thomas ▁Marc elle ▁represented ▁the ▁Good ▁News ▁Club ▁at ▁or al ▁argument , ▁and ▁Frank ▁Miller ▁represented ▁Mil ford ▁Central ▁School . ▁ ▁Major ity ▁opinion ▁When ▁the ▁government ▁establish es ▁a ▁" limited ▁public ▁forum ," ▁it ▁is ▁not ▁required ▁to ▁permit ▁any ▁and ▁all ▁speech ▁within ▁that ▁forum . ▁ ▁It ▁may ▁" res erve ▁its ▁forum ▁for ▁certain ▁groups ▁or ▁for ▁the ▁discussion ▁of ▁certain ▁topics ". ▁ ▁However , ▁the ▁government ▁may ▁not ▁disc rim inate ▁against ▁speech ▁on ▁the ▁basis ▁of ▁its ▁view point , ▁and ▁any