▁the ▁changing ▁circumstances ▁of ▁life . ▁The ▁categories ▁of ▁neg lig ence ▁are ▁never ▁closed ". ▁Lord ▁Mac mill an ▁held ▁that , ▁according ▁to ▁this ▁standard , ▁Stevens on ▁had ▁demonstrated ▁care less ness ▁by ▁leaving ▁bott les ▁where ▁sn ails ▁could ▁access ▁them ; ▁that ▁he ▁ow ed ▁Don og h ue ▁a ▁duty ▁of ▁care ▁as ▁commercial ▁manufact urer ▁of ▁food ▁and ▁drink ; ▁and ▁that ▁Don og h ue ' s ▁injury ▁was ▁reason ably ▁for ese e able . ▁He ▁therefore ▁found ▁that ▁Don og h ue ▁had ▁a ▁cause ▁of ▁action ▁and ▁commented ▁that ▁he ▁was ▁" h appy ▁to ▁think ▁that ▁in ▁... ▁relation ▁to ▁the ▁practical ▁problem ▁of ▁every day ▁life ▁which ▁this ▁appeal ▁presents ▁... ▁the ▁principles ▁of ▁[ English ▁and ▁Sc ots ▁law ] ▁are ▁sufficiently ▁con son ant ▁with ▁justice ▁and ▁common ▁sense ▁to ▁admit ▁of ▁the ▁claim ▁which ▁the ▁app ell ant ▁see ks ▁to ▁establish ." ▁ ▁The ▁minor ity ▁consisted ▁of ▁Lord ▁Buck master ▁and ▁Lord ▁Tom lin . ▁Lord ▁Buck master ▁focused ▁on ▁preced ent , ▁and ▁comm enced ▁by ▁warning ▁that ▁" although ▁[ common ▁law ] ▁principles ▁are ▁capable ▁of ▁application ▁to ▁meet ▁new ▁conditions ▁not ▁cont empl ated ▁when ▁the ▁law ▁was ▁laid ▁down , ▁these ▁principles ▁cannot ▁be ▁changed ▁nor ▁can ▁add itions ▁be ▁made ▁to ▁them ▁because ▁any ▁particular ▁mer itor ious ▁case ▁seems ▁outside ▁their ▁am bit ". ▁He ▁held ▁that ▁there ▁were ▁only ▁the ▁two ▁recogn ised ▁exceptions ▁to ▁the ▁finding