▁is ▁right , ▁they ▁predict ▁( c ) ▁would ▁be ▁viewed ▁as ▁less ▁acceptable ▁due ▁to ▁the ▁un gram mat ical ity ▁of ▁( b ): ▁( a ) ▁Fe wer ▁people ▁have ▁been ▁to ▁Russia ▁than ▁I ▁would ▁have ▁thought . ▁( b ) ▁* Pe ople ▁have ▁been ▁to ▁Russia ▁fewer ▁than ▁I ▁have . ▁( c ) ▁→ ? Fe wer ▁people ▁have ▁been ▁to ▁Russia ▁than ▁I ▁have . ▁Well wood ▁and ▁colle agues , ▁based ▁on ▁their ▁experimental ▁results , ▁have ▁rejected ▁Town send ▁and ▁B ever ' s ▁hypothesis ▁and ▁instead ▁support ▁their ▁event ▁comparison ▁hypothesis , ▁which ▁states ▁that ▁compar ative ▁ill us ions ▁are ▁due ▁to ▁speak ers ▁re inter pre ting ▁these ▁sentences ▁as ▁discuss ing ▁a ▁comparison ▁of ▁events . ▁ ▁Similar ▁constru ctions ▁The ▁term ▁" com par ative ▁ill usion " ▁has ▁sometimes ▁been ▁used ▁as ▁an ▁um bre lla ▁term ▁which ▁also ▁en comp ass es ▁" depth ▁charge " ▁sentences ▁like ▁" No ▁head ▁injury ▁is ▁too ▁trivial ▁to ▁be ▁ignored ." ▁This ▁example , ▁first ▁discussed ▁by ▁Peter ▁C ath cart ▁W ason ▁and ▁Sh uli ▁Reich ▁in ▁ 1 9 7 9 , ▁is ▁very ▁often ▁initially ▁perce ived ▁as ▁having ▁the ▁meaning ▁" No ▁head ▁injury ▁should ▁be ▁ignored — even ▁if ▁it ' s ▁trivial ", ▁even ▁though ▁upon ▁careful ▁consideration ▁the ▁sentence ▁actually ▁says ▁" All ▁head ▁inj uries ▁should ▁be ▁ignored — even ▁trivial ▁ones ." ▁ ▁Phill ips ▁and ▁colle agues ▁have