▁Division ▁accepted ▁the ▁following ▁alleg ations . ▁First ly , ▁that ▁in ▁August ▁ 2 0 0 0 ▁She ikh ▁Moh ammed ▁ordered ▁and ▁orch estr ated ▁the ▁un law ful ▁ab du ction ▁of ▁his ▁daughter ▁She ik ha ▁Sh ams a ▁from ▁the ▁United ▁Kingdom ▁to ▁Dub ai . ▁Second ly , ▁that ▁on ▁two ▁occasions ▁in ▁June ▁ 2 0 0 2 ▁and ▁February ▁ 2 0 1 8 , ▁She ikh ▁Moh ammed ▁ordered ▁and ▁orch estr ated ▁the ▁for cible ▁return ▁of ▁his ▁daughter ▁She ik ha ▁Lat ifa ▁to ▁the ▁family ▁home ▁in ▁Dub ai . ▁In ▁ 2 0 0 2 , ▁the ▁return ▁was ▁from ▁the ▁border ▁of ▁Dub ai ▁with ▁O man , ▁and ▁in ▁ 2 0 1 8 ▁it ▁was ▁by ▁an ▁armed ▁comm ando ▁assault ▁at ▁sea ▁near ▁the ▁coast ▁of ▁India . ▁She ik ha ▁Sh ams a ▁and ▁She ik ha ▁Lat ifa ▁were , ▁following ▁their ▁return ▁to ▁the ▁cust ody ▁of ▁their ▁father ’ s ▁family , ▁alleg edly ▁dep riv ed ▁of ▁their ▁liberty . ▁Third ly , ▁the ▁High ▁Court ▁accepted ▁that ▁Princess ▁H aya ' s ▁ex - hus band ▁had ▁conducted ▁a ▁campaign , ▁by ▁various ▁means , ▁with ▁the ▁aim ▁of ▁har ass ing , ▁int im id ating ▁or ▁otherwise ▁putting ▁her ▁in ▁great ▁fear ▁both ▁in ▁early ▁ 2 0 1 9 ▁when ▁she ▁was ▁still ▁in ▁Dub ai ▁and ▁at ▁all ▁times ▁since ▁her ▁move ▁to ▁England ▁in ▁April