▁the ▁letter ▁nor ▁did ▁it ▁pay ▁any ▁attention ▁to ▁the ▁protest s ▁of ▁Leo ' s ▁leg ates ▁but ▁de posed ▁F lav ian ▁and ▁E use b ius ▁of ▁D ory la e um , ▁who ▁appe aled ▁to ▁Rome . ▁That ▁is ▁one ▁reason ▁that ▁the ▁council ▁was ▁never ▁recognized ▁as ▁ec umen ical ▁and ▁was ▁later ▁rep udi ated ▁by ▁the ▁Council ▁of ▁Chal ced on . ▁ ▁It ▁was ▁presented ▁again ▁at ▁the ▁subsequent ▁Council ▁of ▁Chal ced on ▁as ▁offering ▁a ▁solution ▁to ▁the ▁Christ ological ▁controvers ies ▁still ▁ra ging ▁between ▁East ▁and ▁West . ▁ ▁Council ▁of ▁Chal ced on ▁ ▁E ut ych es , ▁in ▁the ▁beginning ▁of ▁the ▁conflict , ▁appe aled ▁to ▁Leo ▁and ▁took ▁refuge ▁with ▁him ▁on ▁his ▁condem n ation ▁by ▁F lav ian , ▁but ▁on ▁receiving ▁full ▁information ▁from ▁F lav ian , ▁Leo ▁took ▁his ▁side ▁decis ively . ▁Leo ▁demanded ▁of ▁the ▁em peror ▁that ▁an ▁ec umen ical ▁council ▁should ▁be ▁held ▁in ▁Italy , ▁and ▁in ▁the ▁meant ime , ▁at ▁a ▁Roman ▁syn od ▁in ▁October ▁ 4 4 9 , ▁rep udi ated ▁all ▁the ▁dec isions ▁of ▁the ▁" Rob ber ▁Syn od ". ▁In ▁his ▁letters ▁to ▁the ▁em peror ▁and ▁others ▁he ▁demanded ▁the ▁de position ▁of ▁E ut ych es ▁as ▁a ▁Man ich ae an ▁and ▁Doc etic ▁her etic . ▁ ▁The ▁Council ▁of ▁Chal ced on ▁of ▁ 4 5 1 ▁rejected ▁the ▁her