▁completed ▁on ▁Friday ▁ 2 1 ▁June ▁ 1 8 8 9 , ▁and ▁made ▁find ings ▁of ▁cul p able ▁neg lig ence ▁against ▁six ▁of ▁those ▁involved ; ▁those ▁at ▁D und alk ▁responsible ▁for ▁selection ▁of ▁the ▁engine , ▁the ▁driver ▁and ▁both ▁gu ards ▁on ▁the ▁train , ▁and ▁Mr ▁Elli ott ▁who ▁had ▁taken ▁charge . ▁As ▁a ▁result , ▁three ▁of ▁the ▁accused ▁were ▁committed ▁for ▁trial ▁for ▁m ans la ugh ter ▁on ▁the ▁following ▁Monday ▁ ▁( One ▁guard ▁had ▁been ▁injured ▁in ▁the ▁crash ▁and ▁was ▁pres umably ▁still ▁in ▁hospital ; ▁the ▁D und alk ▁personnel ▁were ▁not ▁charged , ▁the ▁' p ract ical ▁trial ' ▁showing ▁that ▁the ▁engine ▁supplied ▁should ▁not ▁have ▁been ▁defeated ▁by ▁Arm agh ▁bank ▁if ▁correctly ▁handled ▁having ▁been ▁carried ▁out ▁on ▁Saturday ▁ 2 2 ▁June ). ▁The ▁j ury ▁are ▁not ▁reported ▁to ▁have ▁made ▁any ▁find ings ▁against ▁more ▁senior ▁management ▁of ▁the ▁Great ▁Northern ▁Railway ▁of ▁Ireland . ▁Elli ott ▁was ▁tried ▁in ▁Dublin ▁in ▁August , ▁when ▁the ▁j ury ▁reported ▁they ▁were ▁unable ▁to ▁agree ; ▁on ▁re - tri al ▁in ▁October ▁he ▁was ▁acqu itted . ▁The ▁cases ▁against ▁the ▁other ▁defend ants ▁were ▁then ▁dropped . ▁ ▁Re comm end ation ▁and ▁consequ ent ▁legisl ation ▁ ▁Re comm end ation ▁trigger ing ▁legisl ation ▁The ▁key ▁recommendation ▁was ▁in ▁fact ▁c ouch ed ▁as ▁a ▁finding : ▁This ▁terrible ▁cal am ity ▁would ▁in ▁all ▁human