, ▁a ▁detailed ▁review ▁is ▁impossible ." ▁Another ▁rev iewer , ▁Victor ▁L . ▁M én age , ▁Professor ▁of ▁Turkish ▁at ▁the ▁University ▁of ▁London , ▁counted ▁over ▁ 7 0 ▁errors ▁in ▁the ▁work ▁and ▁concluded , ▁" One ▁' pre jud ice ' ▁that ▁has ▁van ished ▁in ▁the ▁process ▁is ▁the ▁respect ▁for ▁accuracy , ▁clar ity , ▁and ▁reason ed ▁judgment ." ▁ ▁In ▁his ▁extensive ▁review ▁of ▁the ▁first ▁volume , ▁S per os ▁V ry on is , ▁a ▁special ist ▁in ▁By z antine ▁and ▁Early ▁Ott oman ▁Studies ▁at ▁U CLA , ▁listed ▁a ▁lit any ▁of ▁problems ▁he ▁encountered ▁in ▁the ▁work , ▁such ▁as ▁Shaw ' s ▁assertion ▁that ▁Sultan ▁Me h med ▁II ' s ▁forces ▁did ▁not ▁subject ▁Constantin ople ▁to ▁a ▁full ▁scale ▁s ack ▁and ▁mass acre ▁upon ▁its ▁capture ▁and ▁his ▁account ▁of ▁the ▁treatment ▁of ▁the ▁Gree ks ▁of ▁Cy pr us ▁following ▁the ▁Ott oman ▁con quest ▁in ▁ 1 5 7 1 . ▁V ry on is ▁also ▁charged ▁Shaw ▁for ▁largely ▁failing ▁to ▁consult ▁the ▁proper ▁primary ▁sources ▁of ▁the ▁period ▁and ▁therefore ▁present ing ▁a ▁dist orted ▁picture ▁of ▁the ▁formation ▁of ▁the ▁Armen ian ▁and ▁Greek / E astern ▁Orth odox ▁mil lets . ▁More ▁trou bling ▁alleg ations ▁were ▁put ▁forward ▁by ▁V ry on is , ▁when ▁he ▁accused ▁the ▁Shaw ▁of ▁wh oles ale ▁pl ag iar ism , ▁claim ing ▁that ▁as ▁much ▁as ▁ 9 0