▁dep riv ation ▁of ▁that ▁right ▁is ▁necessary ▁to ▁achieve ▁a ▁comp elling ▁government ▁interest . ▁This ▁doctrine , ▁ar ising ▁from ▁the ▁" li ber ty ▁clause " ▁of ▁the ▁Four teenth ▁Am end ment , ▁is ▁known ▁as ▁substant ive ▁due ▁process . ▁The ▁right ▁to ▁priv acy ▁was ▁found ▁to ▁be ▁fundamental ▁under ▁this ▁doctrine , ▁and ▁a ▁number ▁of ▁rights ▁to ▁choice ▁came ▁out ▁of ▁it , ▁such ▁as ▁in ▁Ro e ▁v . ▁W ade , ▁where ▁the ▁Court ▁found ▁a ▁right ▁to ▁have ▁an ▁abort ion ▁and ▁in ▁Meyer ▁v . ▁Neb r aska , ▁where ▁the ▁court ▁found ▁a ▁parent al ▁right ▁to ▁raise ▁their ▁children ▁as ▁they ▁wish . ▁In ▁Gr is w old ▁v . ▁Connecticut ▁the ▁Court ▁extended ▁this ▁doctrine ▁to ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁proc ure ▁contra ception . ▁Sub st ant ive ▁due ▁process ▁was ▁further ▁expanded ▁to ▁en comp ass ▁children ▁with ▁In ▁re ▁G ault ▁establish ing ▁that ▁children ▁have ▁a ▁right ▁to ▁proced ural ▁due ▁process ▁when ▁the ▁state ▁attempts ▁to ▁take ▁cust ody ▁of ▁them . ▁ ▁Pro ced ural ▁due ▁process , ▁ar ising ▁from ▁the ▁Fif th ▁and ▁Four teenth ▁Am end ments , ▁is ▁minim ally ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁notice ▁and ▁a ▁hearing , ▁but ▁has ▁been ▁held ▁to ▁include ▁in ▁some ▁circumstances ▁rights ▁to ▁coun sel ▁and ▁rights ▁to ▁confront ation . ▁Pro ced ural ▁due ▁process ▁is ▁required ▁any ▁time ▁a ▁person ▁faces ▁the ▁dep riv ation ▁of ▁life , ▁liberty , ▁or