▁gen o cide . ▁This ▁case ▁was ▁the ▁nin th ▁time ▁in ▁which ▁the ▁group ▁had ▁put ▁on ▁the ▁display . ▁University ▁security ▁staff ▁requested ▁that ▁the ▁students ▁turn ▁the ▁graph ic ▁port ions ▁of ▁their ▁display ▁in ward , ▁away ▁from ▁pass ers - by . ▁When ▁the ▁eight ▁students ▁running ▁the ▁display ▁refused ▁to ▁comp ly , ▁the ▁university ▁initi ated ▁non - ac ade mic ▁mis con duct ▁proceed ings ▁against ▁them . ▁The ▁school ' s ▁Vice - Pro v ost ▁ruled ▁that ▁the ▁actions ▁constit uted ▁mis con duct ▁and ▁pen al ized ▁the ▁students ▁with ▁a ▁formal ▁written ▁warning . ▁ ▁This ▁penalty ▁was ▁appe aled ▁to ▁the ▁University ▁of ▁Cal g ary ' s ▁Board ▁of ▁Govern ors , ▁which ▁refused ▁to ▁hear ▁the ▁appeal ▁and ▁u ph eld ▁the ▁penalty . ▁The ▁students ▁then ▁requested ▁that ▁the ▁Court ▁of ▁Queen ' s ▁Ben ch ▁order ▁the ▁Board ▁of ▁Govern ors ▁to ▁allow ▁an ▁appeal . ▁The ▁court ▁ruled ▁in ▁April ▁ 2 0 1 4 ▁that ▁the ▁Board ▁of ▁Govern ors ' ▁decision ▁not ▁to ▁hear ▁the ▁appeal ▁of ▁the ▁students ▁"[ lack ed ] ▁just ification , ▁trans par ency ▁and ▁intellig ibility " ▁and ▁ordered ▁the ▁board ▁to ▁hear ▁the ▁students ' ▁appeal . ▁▁ 2 0 1 9 ▁license ▁plate ▁challeng es ▁ ▁In ▁ 2 0 1 9 , ▁the ▁J CC F ▁took ▁on ▁three ▁cases ▁related ▁to ▁license ▁pl ates ▁that ▁were ▁rev oked ▁due ▁to ▁compla ints ▁—