▁After ▁the ▁result ▁became ▁known , ▁Dum ont ▁and ▁B ouch ard ▁made ▁speech es ▁accepting ▁the ▁result ▁as ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁movement ' s ▁dem ocr atic ▁conv ict ions ▁and ▁express ing ▁hope ▁that ▁a ▁subsequent ▁refer endum ▁would ▁bring ▁a ▁" Yes " ▁victory . ▁ ▁Jacques ▁Par ize au , ▁who ▁had ▁not ▁prepared ▁a ▁con cess ion ▁speech , ▁rejected ▁one ▁prepared ▁by ▁Jean - Fran çois ▁Lis ée ▁and ▁spoke ▁without ▁notes . ▁Not ing ▁that ▁ 6 0 % ▁of ▁French - spe akers ▁had ▁voted ▁yes , ▁he ▁stated ▁that ▁he ▁would ▁address ▁French - spe aking ▁Qu éb é co is ▁as ▁ ▁(" we "), ▁and ▁that ▁they ▁had ▁spoken ▁clearly ▁in ▁favour ▁of ▁the ▁" Yes ." ▁He ▁then ▁stated ▁that ▁the ▁only ▁thing ▁that ▁had ▁stopped ▁the ▁" Yes " ▁side ▁was ▁" m oney ▁and ▁the ▁eth nic ▁vote " ▁and ▁that ▁the ▁next ▁refer endum ▁would ▁be ▁successful ▁with ▁only ▁a ▁few ▁percentage ▁more ▁of ▁French ▁speak ers ▁on side . ▁The ▁remarks , ▁widely ▁l amb asted ▁in ▁the ▁Canadian ▁and ▁international ▁press ▁as ▁eth noc ent ric , ▁spark ed ▁surprise ▁and ▁anger ▁in ▁the ▁" Yes " ▁camp , ▁as ▁the ▁movement ▁had ▁gone ▁to ▁great ▁lengths ▁to ▁dis own ▁eth nic ▁national ism . ▁ ▁Bernard ▁Land ry ▁confront ed ▁Par ize au ▁at ▁a ▁Cab inet ▁meeting ▁the ▁next ▁morning ▁about ▁the ▁remarks , ▁stating ▁that ▁the ▁movement ▁" had ▁to ▁hide ▁its ▁head