stein ▁( as ▁the ▁result ▁of ▁a ▁lib el ▁trial ▁rel ating ▁to ▁issues ▁of ▁alleg ed ▁promotion ▁of ▁terror ism ) ▁as ▁told ▁by ▁the ▁at ten de es ▁of ▁the ▁g ym ▁in ▁which ▁Tag hre ed ▁works ▁( all ▁of ▁whom ▁happen ▁to ▁be ▁Jud ges ▁of ▁the ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al ). ▁ ▁Background ▁ ▁After ▁Keith ▁Bur stein ▁and ▁Dic ▁Edwards ’ ▁opera ▁Man ifest ▁Dest iny ▁was ▁performed ▁at ▁the ▁ 2 0 0 5 ▁Edinburgh ▁Festival ▁Fr inge ▁the ▁London ▁Even ing ▁Standard ▁newspaper ▁published ▁a ▁review ▁which ▁claimed ▁that ▁the ▁opera ▁gl or ified ▁terror ism . ▁Bur stein ▁subsequently ▁took ▁the ▁newspaper ▁to ▁court ▁on ▁the ▁grounds ▁that ▁this ▁claim ▁put ▁him ▁at ▁risk ▁under ▁the ▁terms ▁of ▁the ▁T error ism ▁Act s ▁of ▁ 2 0 0 5 ▁and ▁ 2 0 0 6 . ▁The ▁High ▁Court ▁found ▁in ▁his ▁favour ▁and ▁granted ▁him ▁the ▁right ▁to ▁take ▁the ▁case ▁to ▁a ▁trial ▁by ▁j ury . ▁However , ▁this ▁decision ▁was ▁revers ed ▁in ▁the ▁Court ▁of ▁App e al , ▁which ▁ordered ▁Bur stein ▁to ▁pay ▁the ▁legal ▁costs ▁of ▁the ▁London ▁Even ing ▁Standard ▁( some ▁£ 7 0 , 0 0 0 ). ▁In ▁consequence , ▁Bur stein ▁was ▁bank rupted ▁and ▁the ▁Official ▁Rece iver ▁seized ▁possession ▁of ▁all ▁of ▁his ▁works ▁( including ▁Man ifest ▁Dest iny ). ▁ ▁The ▁court ▁case ▁and ▁its ▁after math ▁inspired ▁David ▁Wilson ▁and ▁Anne ▁A yl or