▁law ▁enfor cement ▁had ▁requested ▁his ▁permission ▁to ▁come ▁on ▁the ▁property . ▁" The ▁entry ▁onto ▁Pet erson ' s ▁property ▁and ▁observation ▁of ▁the ▁el k ▁car c ass , ▁which ▁could ▁not ▁have ▁otherwise ▁been ▁observed , ▁was ▁an ▁un reason able ▁search ▁in ▁viol ation ▁of ▁Article ▁II , ▁Section ▁ 1 1 , ▁of ▁the ▁Mont ana ▁Constitution ", ▁Tri we iler ▁concluded . ▁ ▁Tr iew e iler ▁rejected ▁the ▁state ' s ▁argument ▁that ▁Pet erson ' s ▁offer ▁to ▁lead ▁Anderson ▁and ▁Daw son ▁to ▁the ▁pur port ed ▁kill ▁site ▁and ▁permission ▁for ▁them ▁to ▁examine ▁the ▁el k ▁constit uted ▁sufficient ▁consent ▁to ▁allow ▁the ▁car c ass ▁into ▁evidence ▁as ▁those ▁actions ▁only ▁took ▁place ▁after ▁the ▁sh er iff ▁and ▁w arden ▁had ▁already ▁tres pass ed ▁far ▁enough ▁on ▁to ▁the ▁property ▁to ▁see ▁the ▁car c ass . ▁The ▁court ▁aff ir med ▁the ▁district ▁court ' s ▁den ial ▁of ▁the ▁defend ants ' ▁motion ▁to ▁dismiss , ▁but ▁over ru led ▁its ▁decision ▁not ▁to ▁suppress ▁the ▁evidence ▁from ▁the ▁search . ▁ ▁State ▁v . ▁St iet z ▁ ▁The ▁scenario ▁Justice ▁Marshall ▁fe ared ▁in ▁his ▁Oliver ▁diss ent ▁came ▁to ▁pass ▁in ▁La f ay ette ▁County , ▁Wisconsin , ▁in ▁ 2 0 1 2 . ▁Near ▁sun set ▁on ▁the ▁last ▁Sunday ▁of ▁November , ▁the ▁last ▁day ▁of ▁the ▁state ' s ▁fire arm ▁de er ▁season , ▁Robert ▁St iet