l uit ▁in ▁question ▁did ▁not ▁create ▁a ▁crime . ▁Although ▁it ▁did ▁not ▁make ▁the ▁assumption ▁that , ▁if ▁an ▁en act ment ▁is ▁to ▁create ▁a ▁crime , ▁it ▁should ▁provide , ▁either ▁express ly ▁or ▁by ▁reference , ▁for ▁a ▁pun ishment , ▁" I ▁think ▁it ▁impro b able ▁that ▁if ▁the ▁law g iver ▁had ▁intended ▁that ▁the ▁Bes l uit ▁should ▁create ▁a ▁crime , ▁he ▁would ▁not ▁have ▁taken ▁the ▁pre ca ution ▁of ▁inserting ▁a ▁penalty — more ▁particularly ▁as ▁this ▁is ▁what ▁appears ▁generally ▁to ▁have ▁been ▁done ." ▁ ▁The ▁decision ▁of ▁the ▁Trans va al ▁Provin cial ▁Division ▁( where ▁Barry ▁J P ▁and ▁Mill in ▁J ▁dismiss ed ▁an ▁appeal ▁from ▁conv iction ▁in ▁the ▁Mag istr ate ' s ▁Court ▁of ▁Johannes burg ), ▁was ▁thus ▁revers ed . ▁ ▁See ▁also ▁▁ ▁Crime ▁in ▁South ▁Africa ▁ ▁South ▁African ▁criminal ▁law ▁ ▁South ▁African ▁law ▁ ▁References ▁ ▁Case ▁law ▁▁ ▁R ▁v ▁McC ul lo ch ▁ 1 9 3 0 ▁T PD ▁ 3 5 0 . ▁ ▁R ▁v ▁Z inn ▁ 1 9 4 6 ▁AD ▁ 3 4 6 . ▁ ▁Legisl ation ▁▁ ▁N atives ▁( U r ban ▁Are as ) ▁Act ▁ 2 1 ▁of ▁ 1 9 2 3 . ▁ ▁Notes ▁▁ ▁Category : 1 9 4 6 ▁in ▁South ▁African ▁law ▁Category : 1 9 4 6 ▁in ▁case ▁law ▁Category : App ell ate ▁Division ▁( S