▁restriction ▁it ▁impos es ▁must ▁be ▁reasonable ▁in ▁light ▁of ▁the ▁purpose ▁served ▁by ▁the ▁forum . ▁ ▁The ▁Court ▁saw ▁no ▁distinction ▁between ▁the ▁view point ▁disc rim ination ▁in ▁this ▁case ▁and ▁the ▁view point ▁disc rim ination ▁in ▁two ▁of ▁its ▁earlier ▁cases : ▁ ▁Lamb ' s ▁Chap el ▁v . ▁Center ▁Mor ich es ▁Union ▁Free ▁School ▁District , ▁, ▁and ▁Rosen berger ▁v . ▁University ▁of ▁Virginia , ▁. ▁ ▁In ▁Lamb ' s ▁Chap el , ▁the ▁Court ▁held ▁that ▁a ▁school ▁district ▁viol ated ▁the ▁First ▁Am end ment ' s ▁Free ▁Spe ech ▁Cla use ▁when ▁it ▁ex cluded ▁a ▁private ▁group ▁from ▁present ing ▁films ▁at ▁the ▁school ▁sole ly ▁on ▁the ▁basis ▁of ▁the ▁religious ▁perspective ▁of ▁the ▁films ▁on ▁family ▁values . ▁And ▁in ▁Rosen berger , ▁the ▁Court ▁held ▁that ▁a ▁university ' s ▁ref us al ▁to ▁fund ▁a ▁student ▁publication ▁because ▁of ▁that ▁publication ' s ▁religious ▁perspective ▁viol ated ▁the ▁Free ▁Spe ech ▁Cla use . ▁Mil ford ' s ▁ex clusion ▁is ▁ind ist ingu ish able ▁from ▁the ▁exclus ions ▁at ▁issue ▁in ▁Lamb ' s ▁Chap el ▁and ▁Rosen berger , ▁and ▁so ▁the ▁Court ▁did ▁not ▁need ▁to ▁decide ▁" wh ether ▁it ▁is ▁un reason able ▁in ▁light ▁of ▁the ▁purposes ▁served ▁by ▁the ▁forum ." ▁ ▁" Mil ford ▁has ▁opened ▁its ▁limited ▁public ▁forum ▁to ▁activities ▁that ▁serve ▁a ▁variety ▁of ▁purposes , ▁including ▁events ▁per tain ing ▁to ▁the