▁an ▁example ▁of ▁ju xt ap osition ▁of ▁professional ▁histor ies ▁being ▁usually ▁considered ▁separately . ▁The ▁second ▁case ▁study ▁( a ▁compar ative ▁study ▁of ▁law y ers ▁in ▁the ▁United ▁States ▁and ▁England ) ▁‘ uses ▁court ▁cases ▁on ▁inc urs ions ▁by ▁other ▁profession als ▁to ▁track ▁the ▁nature ▁of ▁professional ▁conflict ’ . ▁The ▁third ▁one ▁analy zes ▁‘ the ▁evolution ▁of ▁the ▁personal - problem s ▁juris diction ’ ▁making ▁an ▁acc ent ▁on ▁the ▁decl ine ▁of ▁the ▁cler gy ▁and ▁the ▁rise ▁of ▁psych iat ry . ▁ ▁The ▁arguments ▁have ▁been ▁crit iqu ed ▁as ▁being ▁subject ive ▁by ▁a ▁rev iewer ▁who ▁said ▁the ▁model ▁of ▁‘ di agn osis , ▁inference , ▁and ▁treatment ’ ▁is ▁considered ▁to ▁be ▁‘ only ▁partially ▁successful '. ▁Second ly , ▁Andrew ▁Abb ott ’ s ▁ins ights ▁‘ build ▁on ▁and ▁complement ▁… ▁professional ization ▁models ▁rather ▁than ▁supp lant ▁them ’ . ▁ ▁Another ▁point ▁of ▁critique ▁mentioned ▁is ▁a ▁way ▁comparison ▁of ▁the ▁volume ' s ▁e colog ical ▁view ▁with ▁the ▁population - ec ology ' s ▁perspective ▁is ▁done : ▁‘ First , ▁the ▁dem ography ▁of ▁prof essions ▁plays ▁a ▁key ▁role ▁in ▁the ▁case ▁studies … ▁Second , ▁Abb ott ’ s ▁call ▁to ▁focus ▁on ▁juris dict ions ▁rather ▁than ▁occup ations ▁should ▁be ▁taken ▁seriously ▁by ▁population ▁e colog ists , ▁who ▁ordin arily ▁focus ▁on ▁organizations ▁rather ▁than ▁nich es . ▁Third , ▁the ▁f ates ▁of