opol y ▁on ▁health ▁ins urance ▁within ▁the ▁province ▁( as ▁it ▁applies ▁to ▁seeking ▁out - of - prov ince ▁treatment ) ▁by ▁Dar cy ▁Allen , ▁who ▁had ▁elected ▁to ▁pay ▁$ 7 7 , 0 0 0 ▁to ▁under go ▁surg ery ▁for ▁his ▁chron ic ▁back ▁pain ▁in ▁Mont ana ▁rather ▁than ▁wait ▁for ▁treatment ▁in ▁Al berta . ▁The ▁case ▁closely ▁mirror ed ▁the ▁ 2 0 0 5 ▁case ▁of ▁Cha oul li ▁v ▁Quebec ▁( AG ) ▁where ▁the ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁of ▁Canada ▁ruled ▁that ▁a ▁government ▁mon opol y ▁on ▁health ▁ins urance , ▁when ▁combined ▁with ▁extremely ▁long ▁wait ▁lists ▁before ▁care ▁could ▁be ▁provided , ▁was ▁a ▁viol ation ▁of ▁the ▁individual ' s ▁right ▁to ▁life , ▁liberty , ▁and ▁security ▁of ▁the ▁person , ▁all ▁of ▁which ▁are ▁guaranteed ▁under ▁section ▁ 7 ▁of ▁the ▁Canadian ▁Char ter ▁of ▁Rights ▁and ▁Fre ed oms . ▁ ▁The ▁Court ▁of ▁Queen ' s ▁Ben ch ▁ruled ▁against ▁Allen ▁on ▁ 3 1 ▁March ▁ 2 0 1 4 . ▁ ▁Wilson ▁v ▁University ▁of ▁Cal g ary ▁ ▁A ▁campus ▁pro - life ▁club ▁caused ▁controvers y ▁at ▁the ▁University ▁of ▁Cal g ary ▁when ▁they ▁ere cted ▁a ▁graph ic ▁display ▁as ▁part ▁of ▁a ▁" G eno cide ▁A war eness ▁Project ," ▁which ▁compared ▁and ▁equ ated ▁the ▁results ▁of ▁an ▁abort ion ▁with ▁historical ▁at roc ities ▁such ▁as ▁the ▁Hol oca ust ▁and ▁the ▁R wand an