▁later ▁discovered ▁to ▁simply ▁be ▁the ▁same ▁type ▁of ▁animal ▁gl ue ▁that ▁Double day ▁used ▁in ▁ 1 8 4 5 . ▁He ▁also ▁filled ▁some ▁areas ▁with ▁w ax . ▁ ▁No ▁documentation ▁of ▁his ▁work ▁was ▁produced . ▁ ▁By ▁the ▁late ▁ 1 9 8 0 s , ▁the ▁ad hes ive ▁was ▁again ▁yellow ing ▁and ▁brit t le . ▁Although ▁the ▁v ase ▁was ▁shown ▁at ▁the ▁British ▁Museum ▁as ▁part ▁of ▁the ▁G lass ▁of ▁the ▁Ca es ars ▁exhibition ▁( Nov ember ▁ 1 9 8 7 ▁– ▁March ▁ 1 9 8 8 ), ▁it ▁was ▁too ▁frag ile ▁to ▁travel ▁to ▁other ▁locations ▁afterwards . ▁Instead , ▁ ▁another ▁reconst ruction ▁was ▁performed ▁between ▁ 1 ▁June ▁ 1 9 8 8 ▁and ▁ 1 ▁October ▁ 1 9 8 9 ▁by ▁N ig el ▁Williams ▁and ▁Sand ra ▁Smith . ▁The ▁pair ▁was ▁over seen ▁by ▁David ▁A ke h urst ▁( C CO ▁of ▁G lass ▁and ▁Cer am ics ) ▁who ▁had ▁ass essed ▁the ▁v ase ' s ▁condition ▁during ▁the ▁G lass ▁of ▁the ▁Ca es ars ▁exhibition ▁and ▁decided ▁to ▁go ▁ahead ▁with ▁reconst ruction ▁and ▁stabil ization . ▁The ▁treatment ▁had ▁scholar ly ▁attention ▁and ▁press ▁coverage . ▁The ▁v ase ▁was ▁photograph ed ▁and ▁drawn ▁to ▁record ▁the ▁position ▁of ▁fragments ▁before ▁dis m ant ling ; ▁the ▁BBC ▁fil med ▁the ▁conservation ▁process . ▁Conserv ation ▁scient ists ▁at ▁the ▁museum ▁tested ▁many ▁ad