▁teacher ▁Sar ve pal li ▁Rad h ak r ish nan ▁into ▁his ▁book ▁Indian ▁Philosoph y ▁II , ▁published ▁in ▁ 1 9 2 7 . ▁The ▁controvers y ▁continued ▁into ▁the ▁February , ▁March ▁and ▁April ▁issues ▁of ▁the ▁magazine . ▁In ▁August ▁ 1 9 2 9 , ▁Sin ha ▁file d ▁a ▁case ▁in ▁the ▁Cal cut ta ▁High ▁Court , ▁against ▁Dr . ▁Sar ve pal li ▁Rad h ak r ish nan ▁for ▁in fr ing ement ▁of ▁his ▁copy right s . ▁Sin ha ▁claimed ▁dam ages ▁for ▁R s ▁ 2 0 , 0 0 0 . ▁Rad h ak r ish nan ▁counter - su ed ▁for ▁def am ation ▁of ▁character , ▁demand ing ▁R s ▁ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ▁from ▁Sin ha ▁and ▁the ▁editor ▁of ▁Modern ▁Review , ▁Ram an anda ▁Ch att op ad hy ay . ▁Sin ha ' s ▁case ▁was ▁strong ▁as ▁many ▁of ▁his ▁articles ▁were ▁already ▁published . ▁However , ▁the ▁parties ▁found ▁the ▁cost ▁of ▁lit ig ation ▁very ▁high . ▁Sy ama ▁Pr as ad ▁M ook er je e ▁medi ated ▁between ▁them . ▁They ▁then ▁settled ▁the ▁issue ▁out ▁of ▁court . ▁ ▁In flu ence ▁Rad h ak r ish nan ▁was ▁one ▁of ▁India ' s ▁best ▁and ▁most ▁influ ential ▁tw enti eth - century ▁sch ol ars ▁of ▁compar ative ▁religion ▁and ▁philosophy . ▁ ▁Rad h ak r ish nan ' s