an ity ". ▁ ▁Green field ▁then ▁un success fully ▁sought ▁habe as ▁cor pus ▁relief ▁in ▁Federal ▁District ▁Court , ▁by ▁su ing ▁the ▁Florida ▁Department ▁of ▁Cor re ctions ▁and ▁its ▁secretary , ▁Lou ie ▁L . ▁W ain w right , ▁arg uing ▁that ▁the ▁pro sec utor ' s ▁use ▁of ▁his ▁silence ▁viol ated ▁the ▁Due ▁Process ▁Cla use ▁of ▁the ▁Four teenth ▁Am end ment ▁as ▁constru ed ▁in ▁Do yle ▁v . ▁Ohio ▁( 1 9 7 6 ). ▁The ▁court ▁aff ir med ▁the ▁conv iction , ▁holding ▁that ▁the ▁general ▁rule ▁pre cluding ▁a ▁pro sec utor ▁from ▁comment ing ▁on ▁a ▁def endant ' s ▁exercise ▁of ▁his ▁right ▁to ▁remain ▁silent ▁did ▁not ▁apply ▁to ▁a ▁case ▁in ▁which ▁an ▁ins an ity ▁ple a ▁was ▁file d . ▁ ▁Dec ision ▁The ▁Court ▁held ▁that ▁the ▁pro sec utor ' s ▁use ▁of ▁respond ent ' s ▁post - arr est , ▁post - M ir anda ▁warnings ▁silence ▁as ▁evidence ▁of ▁san ity ▁viol ated ▁the ▁Due ▁Process ▁Cla use ▁of ▁the ▁Four teenth ▁Am end ment . ▁ ▁See ▁also ▁List ▁of ▁United ▁States ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁cases , ▁volume ▁ 4 7 4 ▁ ▁Foot notes ▁ ▁Further ▁reading ▁ ▁External ▁links ▁▁▁ ▁Category : Un ited ▁States ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁cases ▁Category : Un ited ▁States ▁Supreme ▁Court ▁cases ▁of ▁the ▁Bur ger ▁Court ▁Category : Un ited ▁States ▁Fif th ▁Am end ment ▁self - inc rim ination