▁( P IN ) ▁by ▁Sus sex ▁Police . ▁L ought on ▁then ▁arranged ▁an ▁emer gency ▁parliament ary ▁debate , ▁during ▁which ▁he ▁accused ▁the ▁police ▁of ▁viol ating ▁parliament ary ▁privile ge ▁by ▁issu ing ▁the ▁P IN . ▁A ▁motion ▁for ▁the ▁Stand ards ▁and ▁Priv ile ges ▁Committee ▁to ▁investigate ▁his ▁claims ▁was ▁granted . ▁At ▁a ▁hearing ▁of ▁the ▁Stand ards ▁and ▁Priv ile ges ▁committee ▁in ▁January ▁ 2 0 1 4 , ▁L ought on ▁said ▁that ▁by ▁issu ing ▁the ▁P IN ▁the ▁police ▁had ▁" ex ac erb ated ▁the ▁situation ▁out ▁of ▁all ▁control ". ▁Sus sex ▁Chief ▁Const able ▁Martin ▁Rich ards ▁apolog ised ▁to ▁the ▁committee , ▁claim ing ▁he ▁was ▁una ware ▁the ▁Parliament ary ▁Pap ers ▁Act ▁ 1 8 4 0 ▁gave ▁full ▁legal ▁protection ▁to ▁all ▁parliament ary ▁papers ▁and ▁bl amed ▁conflic ting ▁legal ▁advice . ▁Form er ▁deput y ▁Chief ▁Const able ▁of ▁Sus sex ▁Police ▁Robin ▁Mer rett ▁claimed ▁he ▁" could ▁understand " ▁the ▁constitu ent ▁being ▁" al ar med " ▁at ▁receiving ▁the ▁copy ▁of ▁Hans ard ▁and ▁" fully ▁supported " ▁the ▁police ▁actions . ▁In ▁March ▁ 2 0 1 4 , ▁the ▁Stand ards ▁and ▁Priv ile ges ▁Committee ▁found ▁Sus sex ▁Police ▁in ▁cont empt ▁of ▁Parliament , ▁forcing ▁Sus sex ▁Police ▁to ▁issue ▁an ▁ap ology . ▁ ▁In ▁September ▁ 2 0 1 3 , ▁L ought on ▁apolog ised ▁to ▁former ▁children ' s