▁not ▁available ▁for ▁sections ▁ 3 5 ▁or ▁ 3 6 , ▁since ▁section ▁ 2 4 ▁refers ▁only ▁to ▁the ▁Char ter . ▁ ▁Disc uss ion ▁ ▁Canadian ▁poet ▁George ▁Elli ott ▁Clar ke ▁once ▁analyz ed ▁section ▁ 3 4 , ▁calling ▁it ▁" b land ▁legal ese ." ▁ ▁He ▁wrote ▁it ▁was ▁" re ass uring " ▁because ▁it ▁was ▁d ull , ▁sign alling ▁neither ▁fear ▁nor ▁excitement . ▁ ▁Thus , ▁it ▁seemed ▁to ▁imply ▁the ▁Char ter ▁of ▁Rights ▁was ▁not ▁a ▁radical ▁constitution al ▁change , ▁despite ▁the ▁fact ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁potentially ▁revolution ary ▁for ▁a ▁constitution al ▁mon archy . ▁ ▁In ▁considering ▁the ▁name ▁Canadian ▁Char ter ▁of ▁Rights ▁and ▁Fre ed oms , ▁Clar ke ▁felt ▁the ▁first ▁word , ▁" Can ad ian ," ▁hint ed ▁at ▁Canadian ▁national ism . ▁ ▁He ▁then ▁compared ▁this ▁to ▁the ▁French ▁Dec laration ▁of ▁the ▁Rights ▁of ▁Man ▁and ▁of ▁the ▁Cit izen ▁and ▁the ▁United ▁States ▁Bill ▁of ▁Rights , ▁saying ▁that ▁those ▁documents ▁were ▁written ▁by ▁men ▁who ▁had ▁just ▁emer ged ▁from ▁conflict ▁and ▁still ▁remembered ▁it , ▁and ▁thus ▁Canada ▁could ▁be ▁d ull er . ▁ ▁However , ▁he ▁noted ▁there ▁was ▁some ▁drama ▁in ▁the ▁Char ter ▁in ▁that ▁it ▁was ▁written ▁when ▁there ▁was ▁a ▁threat ▁of ▁Quebec ▁separ at ism , ▁and ▁section ▁ 2 7 ▁( mult icult ural ism ), ▁section ▁ 2 5 ▁( A bor iginal ▁rights ), ▁and