4 chan ▁users ▁who ▁initially ▁pushed ▁G amer gate ▁into ▁the ▁spot light , ▁the ▁goal ▁behind ▁the ▁has ht ag ▁campaign ▁was ▁to ▁" per pet uate ▁mis og yn istic ▁attacks ▁by ▁wrapping ▁them ▁in ▁a ▁debate ▁about ▁eth ics ". ▁An ▁academic ▁analysis ▁of ▁a ▁week ' s ▁worth ▁of ▁public ▁posts ▁tag ged ▁with ▁# G amer gate ▁found ▁that ▁the ▁issue ▁public s ▁involved ▁were ▁not ▁" only ▁or ▁even ▁primarily " ▁concerned ▁with ▁eth ics ▁in ▁g aming ▁journal ism . ▁ ▁In ▁an ▁interview ▁with ▁An ita ▁Sar ke esian ▁in ▁The ▁Guardian , ▁Jess ica ▁Val enti ▁said ▁that ▁" the ▁movement ' s ▁much - mock ed ▁mant ra , ▁' It ' s ▁about ▁eth ics ▁in ▁journal ism ▁was ▁seen ▁by ▁others ▁as ▁" a ▁natural ▁extension ▁of ▁sex ist ▁har ass ment ▁and ▁the ▁fear ▁of ▁female ▁enc ro achment ▁on ▁a ▁tradition ally ▁male ▁space ". ▁Sar ke esian ▁asked , ▁" if ▁this ▁' mov ement ' ▁was ▁about ▁journal ism , ▁why ▁wasn ' t ▁it ▁journal ists ▁who ▁had ▁to ▁deal ▁with ▁a ▁bar rage ▁of ▁ra pe ▁and ▁death ▁thre ats ? ". ▁Wu ▁told ▁The ▁Boston ▁Glo be ▁that ▁the ▁eth ics ▁claims ▁were ▁" a ▁pre text " ▁and ▁described ▁G amer gate ▁as ▁" an ▁actual ▁hate ▁group   [ ...] ▁they ' re ▁ups et ▁and ▁threatened ▁by ▁women ▁who ▁are ▁being ▁very ▁out sp oken ▁about ▁femin ism ". ▁ ▁G