▁as ▁" nothing ▁short ▁of ▁a ▁bomb shell ▁... ▁too ▁well - document ed ▁to ▁have ▁been ▁f aked , ▁as ▁alleg ed . ▁The ▁effect ▁was ▁num bing ." ▁ ▁There ▁were ▁two ▁contradict ions ▁between ▁the ▁report ▁and ▁official ▁records . ▁ ▁B aj r ang i ▁and ▁Richard ▁both ▁claimed ▁that ▁Mod i ▁visited ▁Nar oda ▁P ati ya ▁a ▁day ▁after ▁the ▁violence ▁to ▁thank ▁them . ▁Official ▁records ▁showed ▁that ▁Mod i ▁did ▁no ▁make ▁any ▁visit . ▁India ▁Today ▁called ▁their ▁claims ▁as ▁" bo ast ful ▁lies ". ▁Also ▁in ▁the ▁report , ▁one ▁V HP ▁activ ist ▁said ▁a ▁police ▁super int endent ▁promised ▁to ▁kill ▁five ▁Muslim s ▁and ▁ful filled ▁it ▁during ▁the ▁violence ▁in ▁the ▁D aria pur ▁area . ▁Official ▁records ▁showed ▁that ▁the ▁super int endent ▁was ▁not ▁posted ▁in ▁the ▁given ▁location . ▁ ▁On ▁ 5 ▁March ▁ 2 0 0 8 , ▁the ▁National ▁Human ▁Rights ▁Commission ▁of ▁India ▁directed ▁the ▁Central ▁Bureau ▁of ▁Investig ation ▁to ▁authentic ate ▁the ▁video ▁evidence ▁un cover ed ▁by ▁the ▁Te hel ka ▁report . ▁The ▁C BI ▁investig ated ▁the ▁raw ▁video ▁foot age ▁and ▁the ▁equipment ▁used ▁to ▁create ▁it , ▁and ▁interview ed ▁ 1 4 ▁of ▁ 1 8 ▁" pers ons ▁belonging ▁to ▁different ▁H indu ▁out f its ▁like ▁V HP , ▁B aj r ang ▁Dal , ▁R SS ▁and ▁Gu jar at ▁Police ▁[ who ] ▁have ▁been ▁shown ▁making ▁revel ations