Don Bradman. Bradman retained a pre-eminent position in the game by acting as an administrator, selector and writer for three decades following his retirement. Even after he became reclusive in his declining years his opinion was highly sought, and his status as a national icon was still recognised - more than 50 years after his retirement as a Test player, in 2001, Prime Minister John Howard of Australia called him the "greatest living Australian".
Don Bradman's status as a national icon was recognized after his retirement and he had a long retirement.
Determine if the claim is supported, refuted, or if there is not enough information based on the evidence.

Claim: Don Bradman. Bradman retained a pre-eminent position in the game by acting as an administrator, selector and writer for three decades following his retirement. Even after he became reclusive in his declining years his opinion was highly sought, and his status as a national icon was still recognised - more than 50 years after his retirement as a Test player, in 2001, Prime Minister John Howard of Australia called him the "greatest living Australian".

Evidence: Don Bradman's status as a national icon was recognized after his retirement and he had a long retirement.

Options: 

 - supported

 - refuted

 - not enough information
not enough information
Determine if the claim is supported, refuted, or if there is not enough information based on the evidence.

Claim: Don Bradman. Bradman retained a pre-eminent position in the game by acting as an administrator, selector and writer for three decades following his retirement. Even after he became reclusive in his declining years his opinion was highly sought, and his status as a national icon was still recognised - more than 50 years after his retirement as a Test player, in 2001, Prime Minister John Howard of Australia called him the "greatest living Australian".

Evidence: Don Bradman's status as a national icon was recognized after his retirement and he had a long retirement.

Options: 

 - supported

 - refuted

 - not enough information
user
not enough information
assistant