Bloods. They are identified by the red color worn by their members and by particular gang symbols, including distinctive hand signs. The Bloods comprise various sub-groups known as "sets" between which significant differences exist such as colors, clothing, and operations, and political ideas which may be in open conflict with each other.
The Bloods are identified by the red bandanas worn by their members.
What can you conclude about the claim "Bloods. They are identified by the red color worn by their members and by particular gang symbols, including distinctive hand signs. The Bloods comprise various sub-groups known as "sets" between which significant differences exist such as colors, clothing, and operations, and political ideas which may be in open conflict with each other." if the evidence is "The Bloods are identified by the red bandanas worn by their members."?

Options: 

 - supported

 - refuted

 - not enough information
not enough information
What can you conclude about the claim "Bloods. They are identified by the red color worn by their members and by particular gang symbols, including distinctive hand signs. The Bloods comprise various sub-groups known as "sets" between which significant differences exist such as colors, clothing, and operations, and political ideas which may be in open conflict with each other." if the evidence is "The Bloods are identified by the red bandanas worn by their members."?

Options: 

 - supported

 - refuted

 - not enough information
user
not enough information
assistant