Bloods. They are identified by the red color worn by their members and by particular gang symbols, including distinctive hand signs.
The Bloods have ambiguous hand signs.
What can you conclude about the claim "Bloods. They are identified by the red color worn by their members and by particular gang symbols, including distinctive hand signs." if the evidence is "The Bloods have ambiguous hand signs."?

Options: 

 - supported

 - refuted

 - not enough information
refuted
What can you conclude about the claim "Bloods. They are identified by the red color worn by their members and by particular gang symbols, including distinctive hand signs." if the evidence is "The Bloods have ambiguous hand signs."?

Options: 

 - supported

 - refuted

 - not enough information
user
refuted
assistant