When I replied "Either HP or IBM" and offered some reasons why, he looked at me as if I was from a galaxy far, far away. Needless to say, I was ecstatic when The Wall Street Journal reported that IBM was preparing to acquire Sun.
This morning the front page of The Wall Street Journal reported "IBM Talks Teeter as Sun Board Splits," and CNBC is now reporting that the IBM and Sun deal is off. According to the paper, current CEO Jonathan Schwartz favors the deal, while his predecessor Scott McNealy is against being acquired. The latter is not surprising given that Mr. McNealy often used IBM as the punch line when I saw him on stage.
While all tech stocks are down this morning in early trading, shares of Sun fell two points or 24% in the first half hour of trading. At $6.50 per share, Sun's market cap is $4.83B. Believe it or not, Sun's market cap reached $200B at the height of the Internet bubble.
If you have a few minutes, you should read Robert X. Cringley's "Why IBM Needs Sun" from this morning's MIT Technology Review. He brings up several points that I had not read elsewhere. For one, Sun has an annual R&D budget of $3B. That's nearly a quarter of the company's $13B in annual revenue. He also sees Solaris as a weapon/alternative for IBM in its ongoing battle with SCO.
What do you think? Is this a negotiating tactic for IBM? Will the deal get done, or will a competitor like HP or Dell step in? Add your voice here.