<filename>RFC-cite-refs/bib/rfc8468.bib
@misc{rfc8468,
	series =	{Request for Comments},
	number =	8468,
	howpublished =	{RFC 8468},
	publisher =	{RFC Editor},
	doi =		{10.17487/RFC8468},
	url =		{https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8468.txt},
        author =	{<NAME> and <NAME> and <NAME> and <EMAIL> and <NAME>},
	title =		{{IPv4, IPv6, and IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence: Updates for the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Framework}},
	pagetotal =	15,
	year =		2018,
	month =		nov,
	abstract =	{This memo updates the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) framework defined by RFC 2330 with new considerations for measurement methodology and testing. It updates the definition of standard-formed packets to include IPv6 packets, deprecates the definition of minimal IP packet, and augments distinguishing aspects, referred to as Type-P, for test packets in RFC 2330. This memo identifies that IPv4-IPv6 coexistence can challenge measurements within the scope of the IPPM framework. Example use cases include, but are not limited to, IPv4-IPv6 translation, NAT, and protocol encapsulation. IPv6 header compression and use of IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Area Networks (6LoWPAN) are considered and excluded from the standard-formed packet evaluation.},
}
