<reponame>ghalimi/stdlib
{"id":"01003","group":"easy-ham-2","checksum":{"type":"MD5","value":"dbf6260efb0ece752fa7b7b1193e24fa"},"text":"From <EMAIL>  Mon Aug 12 11:10:08 2002\nReturn-Path: <<EMAIL>>\nDelivered-To: <EMAIL>.com\nReceived: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n\tby phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E2544174\n\tfor <jm@localhost>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 05:57:08 -0400 (EDT)\nReceived: from phobos [127.0.0.1]\n\tby localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)\n\tfor jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:57:08 +0100 (IST)\nReceived: from xent.com ([6172.16.31.1036]) by dogma.slashnull.org\n    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7BGFhb06281 for <<EMAIL>>;\n    Sun, 11 Aug 2002 17:15:43 +0100\nReceived: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)\n    with ESMTP id C9109294177; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 09:12:05 -0700 (PDT)\nDelivered-To: <EMAIL>\nReceived: from venus.phpwebhosting.com (venus.phpwebhosting.com\n    [64.29.16.27]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 67AA0294173 for\n    <<EMAIL>>; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 09:11:54 -0700 (PDT)\nReceived: (qmail 20396 invoked by uid 508); 11 Aug 2002 16:12:56 -0000\nReceived: from unknown (HELO hydrogen.leitl.org) (192.168.3.11) by\n    venus.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; 11 Aug 2002 16:12:56 -0000\nReceived: from localhost (eugen@localhost) by hydrogen.leitl.org\n    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7BGCqh32418; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 18:12:52\n    +0200\nX-Authentication-Warning: hydrogen.leitl.org: eugen owned process doing -bs\nFrom: <NAME> <<EMAIL>>\nTo: <NAME> <<EMAIL>>\nCc: <<EMAIL>>\nSubject: Re: Forged whitelist spam\nIn-Reply-To: <<EMAIL>>\nMessage-Id: <<EMAIL>-<EMAIL>>\nMIME-Version: 1.0\nContent-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII\nSender: fork-admin@xent.com\nErrors-To: fork-admin@xent.com\nX-Beenthere: <EMAIL>.org\nX-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11\nPrecedence: bulk\nList-Help: <mailto:<EMAIL>?subject=help>\nList-Post: <mailto:<EMAIL>>\nList-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:<EMAIL>?subject=subscribe>\nList-Id: Friends of <NAME> <fork.xent.com>\nList-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,\n    <mailto:<EMAIL>?subject=unsubscribe>\nList-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>\nDate: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 18:12:52 +0200 (CEST)\n\nOn Sun, 11 Aug 2002, <NAME> wrote:\n\n> If you're using the mail client on your personal\n> machine, there's no reason you would need to enter\n> a passphrase, unless that is part of how you secure\n> the data on your personal machine. You're private\n\nThe original comment's context was digital signatures. A digital signature\nis worth sqrat if any userspace app or rogue superuser code can grab your\nkeyring in clear, and send out stuff in your name. A passphrase unlocking\nthe keyring for that particular use is a minimal protection (since not\nimmune to passphrase snarfers), but this is much, much better than always\nleaving your key in the lock. (Why then having at all the key, in the\nfirst place?)\n\n> key is as secure as any other data on your machine.\n> If you're working remotely, you already have to\n> enter a passphrase to get to your email.\n\nA passphrase is a (long, secure) password unlocking (decrypting) your \nkeyring. You don't use a passphrase to read your email. Unless it resides \non a crypto file system.\n\nhttp://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork\n\n\n"}