evidence: (b) sovereignty over the territory between the Essequibo River, and the boundary established by the 1899 Award and the 1905 Agreement; and (c) the purported creation of the State of ‘Guayana Esequiba’ and any associated measures, including the granting of Venezuelan citizenship and national identity cards. [...] FIFTH: Do you agree with the creation of the Guayana Esequiba State and that an accelerated and comprehensive plan be developed for the present and future population of that territory, including, inter alia, the granting of Venezuelan citizenship and identity cards, in accordance with the Geneva Agreement and International Law, consequently incorporating that State into the map of Venezuelan territory? [...] The Court observes that the fifth question of the referendum refers explicitly to the "creation of the Guayana Esequiba State", as well as "an accelerated and comprehensive plan [to] be developed" for the "granting of Venezuelan citizenship and identity cards" to the population of that territory, consequently incorporating the "[Guayana Esequiba] State into the map of Venezuelan territory". The Court further observes that Venezuela’s Supreme Tribunal of Justice has confirmed the constitutionality of the questions to be posed in the referendum.