evidence: Except the Indian maps do not show Pakistan-administered Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan and Chinese-controlled Aksai Chin and Shaksgam. None of these four regions is under India’s actual control. For India, they simply don’t exist. The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir goes to the Pakistan border to include what would comprise Azad Kashmir; Ladakh extends to include the other three areas. Terms such as "Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir", "China-Occupied Kashmir", or "Line of Control" also don’t appear on the Indian maps. [...] On the Ladakh map, the term "People’s Republic of China" appears once, while on the Political Map of India released concurrently, it appears twice. In the Ladakh map, "People’s Republic of China" is written where Xinjiang would be, although this region is not specifically named, while Xizang is labelled "Tibet Autonomous Region" but with no obvious reference to it being part of the "People’s Republic of China". Are the Indians trying to subtly tell the Chinese that the status of Tibet may be uncertain?