evidence: After the signing of the Treaty, Croatia’s local politicians in the south of the country, followed by some other experts, objected to the parts of the Treaty related to demarcation at the Klek peninsula and two islets which fell under Bosnian sovereignty. They complained that these localities belong to Croatia, that the border was erroneously drawn and that it should be corrected at these territorial points. From the Bosnian side also came complaints about the demarcation near Kostajnica where, according to these objections, Bosnia and Herzegovina is damaged. The maritime demarcation is also a point of disagreement, creating tensions between the two countries when Croatia decided to build the Peljesac bridge. Although some in Bosnia and Herzegovina tried to block the construction of the bridge until the maritime border is settled, it is currently being built by a Chinese construction company and funded primarily by the EU. [...] The peninsula is 2,5 km long with its width varying between 170 and 480 m. It partially closes the Bay of Kotor. As in the case of Piran Bay, Croatia’s position that maritime delimitation would be based on the principle of equidistance, which Montenegro disagrees with. Bilateral negotiations did not produce any result, while the Protocol has been implemented without any disruption. The tentative agreement between the two countries is that they would submit the case to the International Court of Justice, but this has not yet been done. It has to be added that in the last several years, Montenegro managed to settle its borders with Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo.