evidence: Crucial Quote "If [Trump supporters who aren’t certified poll watchers] come to Philadelphia on Election Day, the polls will be secure, and in order to be an official watcher you have to be certified, your party has to file for you to be there at the polling place legally, so we’ll have a list," Kenney told the Inquirer. "People are simply not allowed to stand around there and intimidate people." [...] Poll watchers could potentially be a source of more controversy this election than in the past, even in cases where they’re certified and allowed to be at polling locations. In addition to Trump’s inflammatory comments, this will be the first presidential election since 1980 in which the Republican Party is not bound by a consent decree, which previously prevented their poll watchers from employing "ballot security" tactics at polling places that could be interpreted as voter intimidation and dissuade Democrats from voting. While the Republican National Committee has said that their poll-watching effort will consist only of legal tactics—but will be much bigger than in the past, with up to 50,000 poll watchers—Democrats and voting experts fear that the consent decree being lifted could result in a new flood of GOP-based voter suppression tactics, particularly given Trump’s rhetoric. "I am very worried about it," Marc Elias, the attorney leading the Democratic Party's voting rights litigation, told 60 Minutes. "It's something that I think everyone who cares about voting rights needs to worry about."