evidence: The Supreme Court has interpreted the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments to forbid methods of execution that needlessly subject condemned inmates to terror, pain or disgrace. Although the court has never invalidated a method of execution, it has recognized that some currently in use would run afoul of this right if administered differently, such as a lethal injection without first rendering the prisoner unconscious. [...] Since the 19th century, the Supreme Court has recognized the constitutional right of citizens of one state to travel unimpeded through other states. The core right to interstate travel has become a live question in the wake of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which eliminated the federal right to abortion access, because legislatures are now seeking to enact laws penalizing travel across state lines to secure an abortion. [...] The Supreme Court has recognized that students do not surrender their constitutional rights when they arrive at a public school. But it has also ruled that their rights are limited by the need of school officials to maintain a productive learning environment. For instance, students retain a right to free speech and expression on campus as long as their conduct doesn’t disrupt school activities. Similarly, students still hold privacy rights on campus. However, school officials don’t require a warrant or probable cause to search or seize their property; they must only have a reasonable suspicion that a search will turn up evidence of a violation of the law or of school rules.