evidence: Zeke Hausfather 09.21.17Zeke Hausfather 21.09.2017 | 12:27amA new study published in the Nature Geosciences journal this week by largely UK-based climate scientists has led to claims in the media that climate models are "wrong" and have significantly overestimated the observed warming of the planet. [...] Much of the media coverage surrounding the paper, Millar et al, has focused on the idea that climate models are overestimating observed temperatures by around 0.3C, or nearly 33% of the observed warming since the late 1800s. For example, the Daily Mail reported: [...] In the figure above, positive values mean that models are overestimating warming. Negative values mean that models are underestimating warming. The wide range of values suggests that concluding that there is a problem with the models based in this single paper’s analysis may be premature, especially since blended model air/ocean temperatures may provide a more accurate comparison.