evidence: Senior advocate Anoop Chaudhari, representing the petitioner against Chavhanke's show, Firoz Iqbal Khan, informed the court that Chavhanke had broadcast multiple episodes on this issue that were blatantly communal in their content. [...] Returning to Chavhanke’s show, Justice Chandrachud asked: "How rabid can it get? The only answer to this to ensure we have a stable democracy is to have some kind of enforceable standards." Senior advocate Shyam Divan, representing Chavhanke and his channel, said he would need a couple of weeks to file a response on these points.