evidence: 11 Ibid, paras 169–70. The distinction between the southern and northern sectors is not altogether clear. In fact, while the Parties agreed that there were two sectors, their views differed regarding the location of the line dividing the two sectors. Bahrain proposed the line connecting Fasht-ad-Dibal with Fa's Rakan, while Qatar suggested a line drawn from Muharraq to Ra's Rakan, namely, the line MQ/RK marked as a ‘closing line’. Counter-Memorial submitted by Bahrain, paras 593–5; Counter-Memorial submitted by Qatar, Maps 6, 7, and 8. [...] 36 According to Qatar, Fasht ad Dibal is located 9.3 miles from the nearest point on the low-water line of Qatar and 13.7 miles from the nearest point on the low-water line of Bahrain. Memorial submitted by Qatar, 212, para 9.11. [...] 129 Although the legal nature of Fasht al Jarim was not specified, the Court held that, given its location, the low-water line might be used as the baseline from which the breadth not only of the territorial sea, but also of the continental shelf and the EEZ, is measured, ibid, para 245. It appears thus that the Court indirectly regarded it as an island, not a low-tide elevation, by referring to the breadth of the territorial sea as well as to the continental shelf/EEZ. If Fasht al Jarim were a low-tide elevation, it would have no continental shelf or EEZ. In addition, the Court observed that at most a minute part of Fasht al Jarim is above water at high tide.