evidence: The resolution of the dispute in Pakistan’s favour would result in them gaining around 3,614 square kilometres of exclusive economic zone. This area is rich in oil, gas, minerals and plant life and therefore, has immense potential. As such, the location of the land terminus of Sir Creek is significant because the displacement of a few kilometres affects both the length and angulations of coastal baselines, effectively changing the size of the territorial sea and the EEZ. Sir Creek is a river boundary dispute, which impacts the delineation of maritime boundaries. It stems from a compromise between the government of Sindh in British India and the Kutch Darbar on boundary delimitation over the Kori Creek, which originally divided the two principalities in 1908, and lies east of the Sir Creek. [...] Sir Creek is a non-navigable river under international law. It is tidal and is only navigable for a few hours during high tide. The thalweg principle is hence inapplicable to Sir Creek. Pakistan’s position, that the boundary is on the eastern bank due to historical title, seems accurate. Under the established principle of uti possidetis, both Pakistan and India inherited the original borders of their predecessor state and the delimitations effected by them. In this regard, Resolution 1192 classifies that the B-44 map is authoritative and expressly rejects the thalweg principle.