evidence: - PART III REPRESENTATION - Contributors - Index 6 - ‘Not Part of Kashmir, but of the Kashmir Dispute’: The Political Predicaments of Gilgit-Baltistan from PART II - POLITICS Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2019 - Frontmatter - Dedication - Contents - Acknowledgements - Map 1 Pre-Partition Jammu and Kashmir - Map 2 Contemporary Kashmir - Introduction: New Directions in the Study of Kashmir - PART I HISTORY - PART II POLITICS - 5 Azad Kashmir: Integral to India, Integrated into Pakistan, Lacking Integrity as an Autonomous Entity - 6 ‘Not Part of Kashmir, but of the Kashmir Dispute’: The Political Predicaments of Gilgit-Baltistan - 7 Law, Gender and Governance in Kashmir - 8 ‘Survival Is Now Our Politics’: Kashmiri Pandit Community Identity and the Politics of Homeland - 9 Beyond the ‘Kashmir’ Meta-Narrative: Caste, Identities and the Politics of Conflict in Jammu and Kashmir - 10 Contested Governance, Competing Nationalisms and Disenchanted Publics: Kashmir beyond Intractability? [...] Indian maps show Gilgit-Baltistan as a part of Jammu and Kashmir – and thereby of India – without giving a hint that this is a representation of claims and not of actual political conditions. According to the Indian position, Gilgit-Baltistan (henceforth GB) is a part of J&K, which has been under the unlawful occupation of Pakistan since 1947. Yet the Indian perspective is strictly contradicted by popular discourse in GB which rejects any pretenses that the area is – or should be considered – part of J&K.