evidence: A year after overturning the constitutional right to abortion, the court over the next month could turn back the clock on voting rights, LGBTQ rights, and decades of progress in diversifying higher education. It could give its stamp of approval to a fringe legal theory that would let state legislatures subvert elections without any chance of court review. And it could strike down the Biden administration’s student debt relief program, which would have damaging financial consequences for millions of Americans. [...] Frustration with the Supreme Court’s radical right turn has spurred action, demonstrating that the high court does not have the only say on people’s constitutional rights. Last year’s ruling that ended the constitutional right to abortion played a major role in swinging midterm elections for candidates who support reproductive rights. In the aftermath of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, a wave of litigation prompted many state supreme courts to rule that state constitutions protect abortion rights, even if the U.S. Supreme Court denies those protections at the federal level. Citizens in Kansas and Kentucky, meanwhile, rejected proposed constitutional amendments that would have ended protections for abortion; and other states have passed measures strengthening abortion rights laws.