Critics of no-fault argue that it does not punish reckless or negligent drivers sufficiently through jury awards or legal settlements, and that some legitimate victims with subtle handicaps find it difficult to seek recovery under no-fault.
Critics of no-fault argue that it does not punish reckless or negligent drivers sufficiently, with only raised premiums and a higher risk rating, and no jury awards or legal settlements. Detractos of no-fault also point out that legitimate victims with subtle handicaps find it difficult to seek recovery under no-fault.