The objection holds that this clashes with our intuitions about morality, since we would normally consider such acts "supererogatory", and that, because consequentialism appears to demand more than common-sense morality, it ought to be revised or rejected.
The objection holds that this clashes with our intuitions about morality, since we would normally consider such acts to "supererogatory", that is, praiseworthy but not obligatory. It is argued that because consequentialism appears to demand more than common-sense morality, it ought to be revised or rejected.