' Los Angeles, Calif.—)—Edward L.
‘Doheny and directors of the Pan-
American Petroteunt and Transport
Scompany, Monday faced a bill of com-

' ptaint demanding an accounting of

| $39,000,000 stockholders alegre they

fast in the fraudulent tease of the Eik
. Hills Naval Oil reserve.
The complaint, filed im behail of

Frank H. Kunkel, Cincinnss:, ant
other sbharehniders, declared the toss
!resulted from the caaceliation of the

lease by a decision of the Umited
States Supreme court after the com
; pany had spent several miliion dollans
In the development of the field. The
‘lease was negotiated far the govecn-
‘ment by Albert FL Fall. theo secretary
fof the interior.

The $196,500 delivernd to Fall by E.

L. Doheny Jr. in the much diss
ttle black satchel” was deciar
the suit to have been given by the
holders and used as a bribe. An
-accomntngs of the exchange also cs
asked,
Kunkel sets forsh in the complaint
that nether he nor any of the piain-
dM stockholders had any knawiedse
of the negotiations and desermbes Do-
heny’a conduct of the deat as a “fraud
not oniy against the United States but
aiso against the Pan-American com.
pany and its stockholders” Doheny is
charged with dominating the affairs
of the company when the lease was
mignesd],

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 
 
eee he ee ee ee |

LOS ANGELES, California, Aug.
28—Edward L. Doheny and direc-
tors of the Pan-American Petro-
leum and Transport Company fac-
ed a bill of complaint demand-
{ng an accounting of $10,000,000
stockholders allege they lost in the

fraudulent lease of the Elk Hills
naval oil reserve,

The complaint, filed in behalf of
Frank H. Kunkel, Cincinnati, and
shareholders, declared the loss re-
sulted from the cancellation of the
lease by a decision of the United
States Supreme court after the
company had spend several million
dolars in the development of the
field.

The least was negotiated for the
government by Albert F. Fall, then
Secretary of the interior.

The $100,000 delivered to Fall by
E. L. Doheny, Jr., in the much dis:
cussed “little black satchel” was de
elared in the suit to have been giv:
en by the stockholders and used as
a bribe. An accounting of this ex:
change also is asked.

‘Kunkel sets forth {In the com.
Plaint that neither he nor any of
the plaintiff stockholders had any
knowledge of the negotiations anc
describes Doheny’s conduct of the
deal as'a “fraud not. only against
the United States but also against
the Pan American company and it:
stockholders.” Doheny {s chargec
with dominating the affairs of the
company when the lease was sign
at.
 