' Los Angeles, Calif.—)—Edward L.
‘Doheny and directors of the Pan-
American Petroteunt and Transport
Scompany, Monday faced a bill of com-

' ptaint demanding an accounting of

| $39,000,000 stockholders alegre they

fast in the fraudulent tease of the Eik
. Hills Naval Oil reserve.
The complaint, filed im behail of

Frank H. Kunkel, Cincinnss:, ant
other sbharehniders, declared the toss
!resulted from the caaceliation of the

lease by a decision of the Umited
States Supreme court after the com
; pany had spent several miliion dollans
In the development of the field. The
‘lease was negotiated far the govecn-
‘ment by Albert FL Fall. theo secretary
fof the interior.

The $196,500 delivernd to Fall by E.

L. Doheny Jr. in the much diss
ttle black satchel” was deciar
the suit to have been given by the
holders and used as a bribe. An
-accomntngs of the exchange also cs
asked,
Kunkel sets forsh in the complaint
that nether he nor any of the piain-
dM stockholders had any knawiedse
of the negotiations and desermbes Do-
heny’a conduct of the deat as a “fraud
not oniy against the United States but
aiso against the Pan-American com.
pany and its stockholders” Doheny is
charged with dominating the affairs
of the company when the lease was
mignesd],

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 
 
LOS ANGELES, Aug. 28.—()—
Edward L. Doheny and directors
of the Pan American Petroleum
and Transport Company, today
faced a bill of complaint demand-
ing an accounting of $10,000,000
stockholders allege they lost in
the fraudulent lease of the Elk
Hills Naval Oil reserve,

The complaint, filed in behalf of
Frank H. Kunkel, Cincinnati, and
other shareholders, declares the
loss resulted from the cancella-
tion of the lease by a decision of
the United States supreme court
after the company had spent sev-
eral million dollars in the devel-
opment of the field.

The lease was negotiated for the
government by Albert B. Fall,
then secretary of the interior.

The $100,000 delivered to Fall
by E. L. Doheny, Jr.. in the much
discussed “‘little black satchel’ was
declared in the siut to have been
the rightful property of the stock-
holders and used as a bribe. An
accounting of this exchange also is
asked.
| Kunkel sets forth in the com-
plaint that neither he nor any of
the plaintiff stockholders had any
knowledge of the negotiations and
describes Doheny’s conduct of the
deal as a “fraud not only against
the United States but also against
the Pan American company and its
stockholders.” Doheny is charged
with dominating the affairs of the
company when the lease was sign-
ed.
 