"Iridescent lipstick from Wet n Wild" in #Singapore #Singapore https://t.co/j6lsBGvnFa #zerowaste #free
Central Region
[{'url': 'https://t.co/j6lsBGvnFa', 'expanded_url': 'https://olioex.com/food-waste-in/-/-/3949570#', 'display_url': 'olioex.com/food-waste-in/…', 'indices': [63, 86]}]
FARRER PARK
['iridescent', 'lipstick', 'wet', 'n', 'wild', '#singapore', '#singapore', 'https://t.co/j6lsbgvnfa', '#zerowaste', '#free']
['wild', 'wild']
iridescent lipstick from wild #singapore #singapore #zerowaste #free
iridescent lipstick wet n wild singapore singapore zerowaste free
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses."},
    ]

It seems that the Twitter post you provided does not relate to a maintenance report feedback for public flat houses in Singapore. The post mentions "iridescent lipstick" and "wet n wild singapore", which are not related to maintenance issues in public housing. Additionally, the mention of "Singapore zerowaste free" suggests that the post is not about a specific maintenance request or issue. Therefore, the answer is "False" for the "relatedness" field, and the "type" field is set to "none" since the post does not fit into any of the categories provided. The "explanation" field provides a brief explanation for why the post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses.