How to safe distance with the sheer amount of people that 5pax instead of 2pax restrictions allow? :( https://t.co/ATv1dmm5bF
The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf
[]
JURONG GATEWAY
ChIJAfQGHg8Q2jERHMPq-G_wdw8
['safe', 'distance', 'sheer', 'amount', 'people', '5pax', 'instead', '2pax', 'restriction', 'allow', ':(', 'https://t.co/atv1dmm5bf']
['safe', 'safe', 'safe', 'restriction', 'restriction', 'restriction', 'restriction']
safe distance with sheer amount people that instead allow
safe distance sheer amount people 5pax instead 2pax restrictions allow
  [
    {"relatedness": True, "type": "facility", "explanation": "broken lift/stairs/etc requires maintenance"},
    {"relatedness": True, "type": "inconvenience", "explanation": "illegal parking causes inconvenience"},
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This is not related to public housing"}
    ]


    Based on the information provided in the Twitter post, it appears that the post relates to a maintenance report feedback for a public flat house. The post mentions "safe distance" and "sheer amount of people" which could be related to a request for maintenance or repair of a facility in a public housing building, such as a lift or stairs. Additionally, the mention of "5pax instead of 2pax restrictions" and "allow" could be related to a request for maintenance or repair of a facility in a public housing building, such as a lift or stairs. Therefore, the answer is:

{"relatedness": True, "type": "facility", "explanation": "broken lift/stairs/etc requires maintenance"}