@ToxicConsort yes, to follow without “following”.
Central Region
[]
BRADDELL
['@toxicconsort', 'yes', 'follow', 'without', '“', 'following', '”']
[]
@toxicconsort follow without following
yes follow without following
  [
    {"relatedness": True, "type": "facility", "explanation": "broken lift/window/etc requires maintenance"},
    {"relatedness": True, "type": "inconvenience", "explanation": "illegal parking causes inconvenience"},
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This is not related to public housing"}
    ]


    Based on the information provided in the Twitter post, it appears that the post relates to a maintenance report feedback for a public flat house. Specifically, the post mentions "yes follow without following", which suggests that the user is reporting an issue with the facility or infrastructure of the public flat house, such as a broken lift or window. The "inconvenience" mentioned in the post could also refer to illegal parking near the public flat house, which would be a separate issue but still related to the public flat house. Therefore, the answer is "yes" for the first two options in the question. However, since the post does not provide any information about public housing, the answer for the third option is "false".