Really? Mao and Pol Pot!!!

@Sarah_Bakewell Why are philosophers so naïve and stupid - from Heidegger to Sartre? https://t.co/4xqsM6j4B6
Sembawang MRT Station (NS11)
[]
SEMBAWANG CENTRAL
['really', 'mao', 'pol', 'pot', '@sarah_bakewell', 'philosopher', 'naïve', 'stupid', 'heidegger', 'sartre', 'https://t.co/4xqsm6j4b6']
['philosopher', 'philosopher', 'stupid']
really @sarah bakewell nave stupid from
really mao pol pot philosophers na stupid heidegger sartre
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "The post does not relate to a maintenance report feedback for public flat house."},
    ]

It seems that the Twitter post does not contain any information related to maintenance report feedback for public flat house. The words used in the post do not match any of the categories related to maintenance report feedback. Therefore, the answer is "False" for the "relatedness" field, and the "type" field is set to "none" since the post does not belong to any category. The "explanation" field is set to a short explanation of why the post does not relate to maintenance report feedback.