https://t.co/f8XJBu8nYb

Sounds like a typical architecture student / practitioner! 

No. Not the bloke. The lady. 

Listen to 2:10 where she talked about ‘flow’….  

Thx @RalaJohann for sharing! 
#be904 #Respek
The Floravale
[{'url': 'https://t.co/f8XJBu8nYb', 'expanded_url': 'https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PANHbjhnYdU&feature=youtu.be#', 'display_url': 'm.youtube.com/watch?v=PANHbj…', 'indices': [0, 23]}]
YUNNAN
['https://t.co/f8xjbu8nyb', 'sound', 'like', 'typical', 'architecture', 'student', 'practitioner', 'bloke', 'lady', 'listen', '2:10', 'talked', '‘', 'flow', '’', '…', 'thx', '@ralajohann', 'sharing', '#be904', '#respek']
['architecture', 'flow']
like typical architecture student practitioner bloke lady listen where about flow @ralajohann #be    #respek
sounds like typical architecture student practitioner bloke lady listen 2 10 talked flow thanks sharing be904 respek
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses."},
    ]

It seems that the Twitter post does not relate to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses. The post does not mention any specific issues or concerns related to public housing, such as broken facilities, inconveniences, or requests for repairs. Therefore, the answer is "False" for the "relatedness" field, and the "type" field is set to "none" because the post does not fit into any other category. The "explanation" field provides a brief explanation for why the post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses.