Indulging after ophthalmologist review one month after eye injury.  Learning to live with the blob that’s in my left eye. Next review in 2 months time. https://t.co/TuzeU1AzWT
Cedele
[]
CITY HALL
['indulging', 'ophthalmologist', 'review', 'one', 'month', 'eye', 'injury', 'learning', 'live', 'blob', '’', 'left', 'eye', 'next', 'review', '2', 'month', 'time', 'https://t.co/tuzeu1azwt']
['learning', 'injury', 'blob', 'injury', 'time', 'injury', 'blob', 'injury', 'blob']
indulging after ophthalmologist review month after injury learning live with blob thats left next review time
indulging ophthalmologist review 1 month eye injury learning live blob left eye next review 2 months time
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat house."},
    ]

It seems that the Twitter post you provided does not relate to a maintenance report feedback for a public flat house. The post mentions an ophthalmologist review and an eye injury, but it does not mention any specific issue or problem with a facility or infrastructure that would be related to maintenance report feedback for public flat house. Therefore, the answer is "False" for the "relatedness" field, and the "type" field is set to "none" because the post does not belong to any category related to maintenance report feedback for public flat house. The "explanation" field provides a brief explanation for why the post is not related to the requested topic.