🎙️"The People's Horse" 👪🐴

3rd in the @SGTurfClub Jockeys Championship for 2020 🥉

@Louis_Beuzelin reflects on his fruitful of not frustrating relationship with #Cointofmontecrosto 

#SGRacing 

Click here 👇 https://t.co/YXFjY4eFlJ
Singapore Turf Club
[]
TURF CLUB
['🎙', '️', "people's", 'horse', '👪', '🐴', '3rd', '@sgturfclub', 'jockey', 'championship', '2020', '🥉', '@louis_beuzelin', 'reflects', 'fruitful', 'frustrating', 'relationship', '#cointofmontecrosto', '#sgracing', 'click', '👇', 'https://t.co/yxfjy4eflj']
['horse', 'fruitful']
people horse @sgturfclub championship @louis beuzelin fruitful relationship with #cointofmontecrosto #sgracing click here
people horse 3rd jockeys championship 2020 reflects fruitful frustrating relationship cointofmontecrosto sgracing click
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat house."},
    ]

It seems that the Twitter post you provided does not relate to a maintenance report feedback for a public flat house. The post mentions "people horse" and "jockeys championship 2020", which do not seem to be related to maintenance or public housing. Additionally, the mention of "fruitful frustrating relationship" and "cointofmontecrosto sgracing click" do not provide any clear context or relevance to maintenance report feedback. Therefore, the answer is "False" for the question "Does the post relate to a maintenance report feedback to public flat house?"