@keithrozario @theburningmonk Moving the implementation of the workflow out of effectively a general purpose language that can run locally surely has consequences ?
East Region
[]
FRANKEL
['@keithrozario', '@theburningmonk', 'moving', 'implementation', 'workflow', 'effectively', 'general', 'purpose', 'language', 'run', 'locally', 'surely', 'consequence']
['general', 'general']
@keithrozario @theburningmonk moving implementation effectively general purpose language that locally surely
moving implementation workflow effectively general purpose language run locally surely consequences
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses."},
    ]

It seems that the Twitter post is not related to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses. The post mentions "moving implementation workflow" and "general purpose language" which do not seem to be related to maintenance reports or public housing. Additionally, the post mentions "running locally" which suggests that it may not be related to a larger-scale issue that would require maintenance report feedback.