Presenting some new work with Kenyon Branan at #LSA2021 in an hour! What happens to our theory of copy-chain interpretation at LF if we take Condition A reconstruction facts seriously? With consequences for parasitic gaps, weak crossover, and Postal 1994 A vs B extractions!
Central Region
[]
PEARL'S HILL
['presenting', 'new', 'work', 'kenyon', 'branan', '#lsa2021', 'hour', 'happens', 'theory', 'copy-chain', 'interpretation', 'lf', 'take', 'condition', 'reconstruction', 'fact', 'seriously', 'consequence', 'parasitic', 'gap', 'weak', 'crossover', 'postal', '1994', 'v', 'b', 'extraction']
['theory', 'fact', 'reconstruction', 'theory', 'reconstruction', 'gap']
some work with #lsa     hour what theory interpretation take condition reconstruction seriously with parasitic weak crossover postal
presenting new work kenyon branan lsa2021 hour happens theory copychain interpretation lf take condition reconstruction facts seriously consequences parasitic gaps weak crossover postal 1994 vs b extractions
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "The post does not relate to a maintenance report feedback for a public flat house."},
    ]

It seems that the Twitter post you provided does not contain any information related to a maintenance report feedback for a public flat house. The post appears to be about a new work by Kenyon Branan, and does not mention any issues or concerns related to public housing. Therefore, the answer is "False" for the "relatedness" field, and "none" for the "type" field, with a brief explanation provided in the "explanation" field.