J&amp;J Loses a Round in Bankruptcy Spat Over Baby Powder Suits https://t.co/r2PezBOKPs
North-East Region
[{'url': 'https://t.co/r2PezBOKPs', 'expanded_url': 'http://dlvr.it/SB7dGJ', 'display_url': 'dlvr.it/SB7dGJ', 'indices': [64, 87]}]
SERANGOON GARDEN
['j', 'j', 'loses', 'round', 'bankruptcy', 'spat', 'baby', 'powder', 'suit', 'https://t.co/r2pezbokps']
['baby', 'baby', 'bankruptcy', 'bankruptcy', 'bankruptcy', 'spat', 'bankruptcy', 'spat', 'bankruptcy']
round bankruptcy spat over baby powder
j amp j loses round bankruptcy spat baby powder suits
  [
    {"relatedness": False, "type": "none", "explanation": "This post does not relate to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses."},
    ]

The provided Twitter post does not appear to be related to maintenance report feedback for public flat houses. The post mentions "j amp j loses round bankruptcy spat baby powder suits," which does not seem to be a relevant topic for maintenance report feedback. Therefore, the answer is "False" for the "relatedness" field, and the "type" field is set to "none" since the post does not fit into any other category. The "explanation" field provides a brief explanation for why the post is not related to maintenance report feedback.