article_snippet: But Judge Sarah Wright has now ruled that Judge Sarah Wright 'entrenched' views were harmful to his 'entrenched' views children.
article_snippet: Handing down the judgement at the High Court, Judge Sarah Wright said Judge Sarah Wright made the decision because there was no prospect of A father who believed he had the right to smack his two young children ever changing A father who believed he had the right to smack his two young children 'domineering behaviour'.
article_snippet: Judge Sarah Wright added that the children's mother could not protect the youngsters from Judge Sarah Wright partner's need to have 'total control' over his family.
article_snippet: Judge Sarah Wright said: 'It was clear to Judge Sarah Wright that Judge Sarah Wright cannot separate Judge Sarah Wright from A father who believed he had the right to smack his two young children and from A father who believed he had the right to smack his two young children entrenched views. '
article_snippet: Sadly, Judge Sarah Wright has put A father who believed he had the right to smack his two young children before Judge Sarah Wright children.
article_snippet: Judge Sarah Wright refused to accept any view or opinion that is not A father who believed he had the right to smack his two young children.
article_snippet: Judge Sarah Wright singularly fails to appreciate the risk that A father who believed he had the right to smack his two young children poses to any child in A father who believed he had the right to smack his two young children care'.
article_snippet: There is also very little prospect of the father accepting the need to change', said Judge Wright.
highlights_snippet: But a judge has ruled a judge 'entrenched' views are harmful to Parent, from Rotherham children .
  