article_snippet: The outcome of that policy is that Raheem Sterling looks greedy –
article_snippet: In financial terms - his agent is looking after his , obviously.
article_snippet: his’s got a family, his wants to set his up comfortably for the rest of his life, and I can’t think of a reason why a player shouldn’t be allowed to do that.
article_snippet: The days of a player accepting less than his feels his is worth because his is at a great club that gave his a big opportunity are long gone.
article_snippet: Why should Daniel Sturridge accept a less lucrative deal because of that?
article_snippet: If a player is committing to a club long-term, then a less lucrative deal has to be right.
article_snippet: but this is the Premier League where players' salaries are abnormally high.
article_snippet: And to expect Sterling to launch Sterling own one-man crusade for fairer wages in football is laughable.
article_snippet: If his agent had accepted that then Sterling would surely have sacked Daniel Sturridge.