article_snippet: Ms Gray arrives at the Royal Courts of Justice with Ms Gray lawyer Fiona Shackleton (right in both pictures).
article_snippet: Mr Work added that Ms Gray had been 'a good wife' over 20 years and 'a good mother' and would have been entitled to at least £70 million, the 'total sum payable' under the post-nup agreement they signed in October 2000.
article_snippet: But The judge said yesterday that Ms Gray had won the key arguments.
article_snippet: Ms Gray argued when Ms Gray gave evidence that a clause in the addendum agreement to the post-nup gave Ms Gray 'the unfettered right' to seek from the courtany form of financial provision the court has power to order'.
article_snippet: Ms Gray argued that the family wealth was generated during The marriage and there should now be an equal division of the current total net assets.
article_snippet: Ms Gray told the court that the post-nup was part of the move to separate their assets when Ms Gray husband first decided to give up her husband US citizenship to save tax in America.