article_snippet: Disturbing questions were being asked last night about four judges caught looking at pornography at work.
article_snippet: Fearing a cover-up, MPs and legal experts want to know whether the four were looking at X-rated material while presiding over trials.
article_snippet: Two are known to have overseen cases in which the charges related to pornography or sex offending.
article_snippet: Three were viewing explicit material in overseen cases in which the charges related to pornography or sex offending chambers.
article_snippet: Sex scandals being regularly unearthed have made us all suspicious about the behaviour of public officials.
article_snippet: This means no one can know whether the judges judge was watching pornography during recesses in the judges own case or whether cases that might have involved complicated sexual issues were being run by a judge who was using pornography in his office during the trial.
article_snippet: No details were given about how the allegation of viewing pornography on office computers came to be made against judges in four different courts.
article_snippet: There was speculation the judges’ misuse of office computers could have been noticed as part of security checks of IT systems.
article_snippet: Yesterday’s statement said that the pornography viewed by the judges did not have illegal content, but the pornography viewed by the judges did not say whether other criminal charges were considered in other criminal charges cases.
article_snippet: They sat in judgment over sex offences .