article_snippet: But Caroline Hopkins, 62, complained that a 'post-nuptial' agreement under which Mrs Hopkins would receive two properties, £350,000 and a share of her ex-husband's pension had been breached after Caroline Hopkins was put under 'undue pressure' and exploited - and argued that Caroline Hopkins should be awarded a further £2million.
article_snippet: A High Court (pictured) judge rejected Caroline Hopkins claim for £2million after Caroline Hopkins signed a 'post-nuptial' agreement, which already entitled Caroline Hopkins to two properties, £350,000 and a share of Caroline Hopkins ex-husband's pension .
article_snippet: Deputy High Court Judge Nicholas Cusworth QC, in a written ruling, said that Deputy High Court Judge Nicholas Cusworth QC preferred Mr Hopkins's evidence - and added Caroline Hopkins had 'sought to underplay' a 'post-nuptial' agreement under which Mrs Hopkins would receive two properties, £350,000 and a share of her ex-husband's pension and had 'dramatised' what happened.
article_snippet: Deputy High Court Judge Nicholas Cusworth QC rejected Caroline Hopkins claim of 'undue influence' and cleared Mr Hopkins of 'badgering and harassing' Caroline Hopkins.
article_snippet: Caroline Hopkins also accused her ex-husband of 'bullying' Caroline Hopkins into signing up to the deal.
article_snippet: Caroline Hopkins said that when Caroline Hopkins had questioned the fairness of a 'post-nuptial' agreement under which Mrs Hopkins would receive two properties, £350,000 and a share of her ex-husband's pension, he had become 'uncontrollably angry', raising he fist and tightening Caroline Hopkins clothes around Caroline Hopkins neck.
article_snippet: Deputy High Court Judge Nicholas Cusworth QC (pictured) said Caroline Hopkins had 'sought to underplay' the post-nuptial agreement .
article_snippet: But the judge ruled it would simply be 'unfair' to Caroline Hopkins if the judge ex-wife was not held to the terms of the post-nup.
article_snippet: the judge found Caroline Hopkins had done nothing which undermined Caroline Hopkins ability to 'form Caroline Hopkins own mind' about the agreement and what it meant.
article_snippet: Although Caroline Hopkins had 'confessed to bullying behaviour' in some letters Caroline Hopkins wrote, the judge concluded: 'I reject his ex-wife's case that his ex-wife was operating under any undue influence, duress or improper pressure when his ex-wife entered into the post-nuptial settlement'. '
article_snippet: Caroline Hopkins had never contended for more than a 'needs-based award' following Caroline Hopkins divorce, and the judge said that was what the post-nup gave his ex-wife.
highlights_snippet: Caroline Hopkins claimed Caroline Hopkins had been bullied and badgered into signing the deal .
  
highlights_snippet: But a judge rejected claims that Caroline Hopkins had been under 'undue influence' 