article_snippet: Mr Work lawyers suggested the husband was entitled to a greater share of money because the husband made a 'special contribution' through the husband skills at wealth-creating.
article_snippet: Mr Work was 'the breadwinner' and Ms Gray 'the homemaker', the court was told.
article_snippet: Mr Work disagreed and said: 'It would, in my view, be unsatisfactory and gender discriminatory now to make an unequal award.'
article_snippet: Mr Work urged the couple to compromise and agree on a fair division of assets, including antique furniture and modern art, to achieve equal shares and 'to stop this terrible conflict'.
article_snippet: Earlier, Mr Work described the two-week 'who-gets-what' hearing as 'unedifying and destructive pugilism'.
article_snippet: Mr Work told them as them sat on opposite sides of the courtroom there was 'plenty of money to go round', there were no difficulties and it 'should be so easy'.
article_snippet: Mr Justice Holman (above) disagreed with Mr Work (above) and said: 'It would, in my view, be unsatisfactory and gender discriminatory now to make an unequal award' In 1997 Mr Justice Holman (above) was offered a job with Lone Star in Dallas, Texas, and soon afterwards Mr Justice Holman (above) was offered a post in Tokyo, where the couple lived from 1998 until 2005.
article_snippet: The judge said Mr Work (above) was 'very shocked and very hurt by The judge wife's infidelity and affair' and it also caused considerable upset to the couple's two children.
article_snippet: Mr Work, described in court as a world-class triathlete, denied that was true.
highlights_snippet: American Randy Work slammed by judge at High Court in London .
  
highlights_snippet: Judge said offering Gray an unequal award would be unsatisfactory .