article_snippet: Mr Kovacic, from Bedford, Bedfordshire, sued 68-year-old Norma Wroe estate and 68-year-old Norma Wroe insurers, Aviva, for £900,000 in damages.
article_snippet: But Aviva's suspicions were raised and 68-year-old Norma Wroe was placed under surveillance in 2013.
article_snippet: After viewing the videos, which were recorded on nine days over several weeks, Judge Neil Bidder said Judge Neil Bidder was sure 68-year-old Norma Wroe description of Judge Neil Bidder disabilities 'simply could not be believed'.
article_snippet: All of the experts who had backed 68-year-old Norma Wroe case changed All of the experts who had backed Mr Kovacic's case opinions in light of the footage.
article_snippet: Aviva had offered to settle 68-year-old Norma Wroe claim for £350,000, but 68-year-old Norma Wroe insisted on fighting for more in court even after 68-year-old Norma Wroe lawyers withdrew from Mr Kovacic's case.
article_snippet: Mr Kovacic, who represented himself, told the High Court in London that the undercover footage was 'unrepresentative' and did not show 68-year-old Norma Wroe on
article_snippet: But Judge Neil Bidder said the odds against 68-year-old Norma Wroe only having been filmed on his 'bad days' were 'huge'.
article_snippet: Judge Neil Bidder told the High Court: 'I have concluded that 68-year-old Norma Wroe can simply not be believed in relation to 68-year-old Norma Wroe condition and, except where his claim is supported by reliable other evidence, I am unable to accept 68-year-old Norma Wroe account.' '
article_snippet: I'm afraid that, having seen 68-year-old Norma Wroe give 68-year-old Norma Wroe evidence and having seen the DVDs, I am driven to the conclusion that 68-year-old Norma Wroe deliberately exaggerated his condition.'