article_snippet: Some reports suggested on Sunday that lawyers representing Lance Armstrong placed certain limitations on what CIRC could ask, which in turn was being given as a reason for the stance CIRC have now adopted.
article_snippet: But Lance Armstrong’s legal team vehemently deny that, insisting that no restrictions were placed on CIRC in Armstrong’s legal team two interviews with the Texan.
article_snippet: Only recently Lance Armstrong suggested to the BBC that Lance Armstrong had answered all CIRC’s questions candidly.
article_snippet: Lance Armstrong is sure to be angered by the fact that a number of Lance Armstrong contemporaries – who have also been guilty of doping offences – did not even cooperate with CIRC and yet remain senior figures in the sport.
article_snippet: Cookson, had warned that such a lack of cooperation would be frowned upon and it will be interesting to see if Lance Armstrong sticks to Lance Armstrong promise of introducing a fit-and-proper-person test for cycling team officials in the wake of the CIRC report.
article_snippet: Cookson has said the CIRC report will make ‘uncomfortable’ reading for Lance Armstrong sport.
article_snippet: ’ Brian Cookson, the UCI president, has said that the CIRC report will make for 'uncomfortable reading' Chris Froome revealed to Sportsmail that Chris Froome has spoken to CIRC about the problem of doping .
article_snippet: But Chris Froome also took a swipe at Armstrong, accusing Chris Froome of having an ‘agenda’ for revealing Chris Froome had spoken to CIRC in the first place.
article_snippet: But criticising anyone for revealing anyone have spoken to CIRC seems a curious position to adopt when the promise of anonymity might yet protect those who haven’t come forward.
article_snippet: Only last week Chris Froome revealed to Sportsmail that Chris Froome too has spoken to CIRC, having wanted to give a senior rider’s perspective on the problems that continue to undermine the UCI