article_snippet: The defendant herself said The defendant herself didn't have a clue of finances or computers. '
article_snippet: The defendant herself had little or no understanding of banking and
article_snippet: how little or no understanding of banking worked because The defendant herself had control in relation to The defendant herself .
article_snippet: In terms of monies, The defendant herself had somewhere between £10,000-15,000 of The defendant herself own money in savings other than the inheritance that The defendant herself received, held in various accounts.
article_snippet: his mother claims said his mother was never told to not spend the money - and would show The defendant herself receipts after withdrawing from the cash point.
article_snippet: his mother didn't consider his mother actions dishonest and said The defendant herself would probably have let his mother take the money if his mother asked.
article_snippet: This was more than just a breach of trust because of The defendant herself vulnerability
article_snippet: The defendant herself was heavily dependant on his mother, the degree of trust was higher.'
article_snippet: his mother admitted that his mother had dealt with The defendant herself financial matters and bills and said that the transactions were both for his mother sole use and for both joint use.
article_snippet: But his mother claims said his mother was never told not to spend the money  - and would show The defendant herself receipts after withdrawing from the cash point.
article_snippet: mitigation defence lawyer Anthony Parkinson added: 'These offences would not have been committed had all the money not been readily available.