article_snippet: An appeal from The Harrow East MP has now been rejected by Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis on the basis that Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis ‘largely reiterated the points made by Bob Blackman in Bob Blackman original representations’.
article_snippet: Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis is also understood to be considering new evidence and has already warned Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis could extend Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis inquiry back further than January 2013 - potentially opening Bob Blackman up to a fresh bill.
article_snippet: In Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis , Bob Blackman condemned the findings as ‘arbitrary and draconian’ and designed to generate a ‘good headline for Ipsa’.
article_snippet: Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis stressed Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis had apologised for £82.80 of travel to party political events, and was ‘extremely reluctantly’ ready to repay £97.65 for party political journeys even though Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis had not ‘properly evaluated’ the situation.
article_snippet: Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis said Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis would return another £56.70 for home to office travel because Ipsa compliance officer Peter Davis could not produce ‘detailed evidence’ to support it.
article_snippet: The watchdog triggered an initial investigation by The watchdog compliance officer in December 2012, with Bob Blackman being told:
article_snippet: After a discussion with Bob Blackman, Bob Blackman declined to launch a full-blown investigation, instead deciding the issue could be dealt with through ‘support and advice from Ipsa to ensure the MP improved Bob Blackman record-keeping’.
article_snippet: The compliance officer this time launched a formal probe - but only looked at claims made after The compliance officer meeting with the MP in January 2013.