article_snippet: It was here where all the confusion began. '
article_snippet: Leonie Farrell said the manager was 'unfamiliar with criminal procedure' and 'saw no distinction' between a charge and an allegation.
article_snippet: the worker did not do so deliberately or maliciously ... it was a simple misunderstanding resulting from the worker unfamiliarity with the matters being raised,' Leonie Farrell said.
article_snippet: South Australia Police later confirmed that 'the comments made by the ex-partner appeared to have no substance'.
article_snippet: It was ruled that it was clear there had been a misunderstanding, that the worker had not breached the code of ethics and should never have been suspended.
highlights_snippet: But comments made by his ex-partner had 'no substance'
  Tribunal rules ruled that it was clear there had been a misunderstanding .