article_snippet.sent: Yes, the courier delivery service.
article_snippet.sent: Where would FedEx FedEx be incarcerated?  
article_snippet.sent: Even if corporations can be held criminally liable, should a courier service like FedEx be held liable for "possessing" what bad guys may send through a courier service like FedEx?
article_snippet.sent: The answer, according to FedEx, is not just "No," but a "No" so conclusive that this case should never see a courtroom.
article_snippet.sent: Such is the case with couriers who routinely drive to your home, walk up to your door and hand you a package, completely ignorant about what is inside your door.
article_snippet.sent: It's hard to argue the UPS guy intentionally "possessed" your subscription to porno mags, in their nondescript brown packaging.
article_snippet.sent: That is the idea behind the "common carrier" exception to possession, and a large part of FedEx's compelling legal argument.
article_snippet.sent: FedEx's couriers in Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia expressed safety concerns that were circulated to FedEx senior management.
article_snippet.sent: I'm just not sure that FedEx has anything to do with the kingpins of the "FR33 CYALIS" email campaign.
article_snippet.sent: FedEx has a strong argument for dismissal in this case, but even if not, FedEx won't be swapping FedEx logo orange for prison orange anytime soon.
highlights_snippet.sent: : FedEx has a strong argument that FedEx shouldn't be held responsible .